Baumslag–Solitar group

One sheet of the Cayley graph of the Baumslag–Solitar group BS(1, 2). Red edges correspond to a and blue edges correspond to b.
The sheets of the Cayley graph of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(1, 2) fit together into an infinite binary tree.
Animated depiction of the relation between the "sheet" and the full infinite binary tree Cayley graph of BS(1,2)
Visualization comparing the sheet and the binary tree Cayley graph of . Red and blue edges correspond to and , respectively.

In the mathematical field of group theory, the Baumslag–Solitar groups are examples of two-generator one-relator groups that play an important role in combinatorial group theory and geometric group theory as (counter)examples and test-cases. They are given by the group presentation

For each integer m and n, the Baumslag–Solitar group is denoted BS(m, n). The relation in the presentation is called the Baumslag–Solitar relation.

Some of the various BS(m, n) are well-known groups. BS(1, 1) is the free abelian group on two generators, and BS(1, −1) is the fundamental group of the Klein bottle.

The groups were defined by Gilbert Baumslag and Donald Solitar in 1962 to provide examples of non-Hopfian groups. The groups contain residually finite groups, Hopfian groups that are not residually finite, and non-Hopfian groups.

Linear representation

Define

The matrix group G generated by A and B is a homomorphic image of BS(m, n), via the homomorphism induced by

It is worth noting that this will not, in general, be an isomorphism. For instance if BS(m, n) is not residually finite (i.e. if it is not the case that |m| = 1, |n| = 1, or |m| = |n|[1]) it cannot be isomorphic to a finitely generated linear group, which is known to be residually finite by a theorem of Anatoly Maltsev.[2]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ See Nonresidually Finite One-Relator Groups by Stephen Meskin for a proof of the residual finiteness condition
  2. ^ Anatoliĭ Ivanovich Mal'cev, "On the faithful representation of infinite groups by matrices" Translations of the American Mathematical Society (2), 45 (1965), pp. 1–18

References