PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Battle of Batogahara
	Part of the Sengoku period
Date	15 February 1564
Location	Okazaki, Aichi, Mikawa Province34°55′49.1351″N 137°10′41.8717″E / 34.930315306°N 137.178297694°E
Result	Matsudaira victory
Belligerents
Ikkō-ikki monks	Matsudaira clan and Jōdo-shū monks
Commanders and leaders
Kuzei; Honda Masanobu; Natsume Yoshinobu; Hachiya Sadatsugu	Matsudaira Motoyasu; Sakai Tadatsugu; Ishikawa Kazumasa; Honda Shigetsugu; Kōriki Kiyonaga; Amano Yasukage; Ōkubo Tadayo; Sakakibara Yasumasa; Honda Tadakatsu
	class=notpageimage\| Location within Aichi Prefecture Battle of Azukizaka (1564) (Japan)

The Battle of Azukizaka (小豆坂の戦い, Azukizaka no tatakai) or Battle of Batō-ga-hara (馬頭原の戦い, Batō-ga-hara no tatakai) took place on 15 February 1564, when Matsudaira Motoyasu (later renamed Tokugawa Ieyasu), sought to destroy the growing threat of the Ikkō-ikki, a league of monks, samurai, and peasants who were strongly against samurai rule.

Background

The Ikko-Ikki was an armed rebel movements started by followers of the Jōdo Shinshū sect which centered on Hongan-ji temple institution. In Mikawa, the sect had been spreading its teachings mainly in the middle and lower reaches of the Yahagi River since the Kamakura period. However, after Honshu-ji Temple in Toro (Okazaki City) was founded by the 8th head priest Rennyo, the influence of the Jodo Shinshu Honganji sect spread rapidly. During the Sengoku period, Honganji temples such as Honsho-ji Temple in Nodera (Anjo City), Jōgū-ji Temple in Sasaki (Okazaki City), and Shōman-ji Temple in Harizaki (Okazaki City) were known as the "Three Mikawa Temples" and boasted great power, each with over 100 of temples. According to the Mikawa Monogatari record, the cause of the uprising was said to be that Ieyasu's vassal, Sakai Masachika, entered Honsho-ji Temple on the pretext of pursuing rebels, thereby violating his privilege of not allowing shugoshifunyu (guardian envoys to stay away from the temple), although there was very little details about the incident.^[1]

The Ikko Ikki are often thought to have been organized by farmers, but there is also samurai members participated. Some of Ieyasu's vassals were known for their adherence to the Ikko Ikki, and while some, such as Ishikawa Kazumasa, Amano Yasukage, Shibata Yasutada, Honda Shigetsugu, and Honda Tadakatsu, converted to Jodo sect and sided with Ieyasu, others, such as Honda Masanobu, Honda Masashige, Watanabe Moritsuna, Hachiya Sadatsugu, and Natsume Yoshinobu, refused to convert from Jodo Shinshu and sided with the Ikko Ikki. Moreover, the Ikko Ikki also requested support from Kira Yoshiaki of Tojo Castle (Nishio City) and Arakawa Yoshihiro of Arakawa Castle (Nishio City), because Kira Yoshiaki was allied with Imagawa Ujizane and was at odds with Ieyasu, who had defected from the Imagawa clan. Tensions between the Tokugawa clan authorities of Mikawa and the Ikko followers had been escalating in Mikawa as they resisted the Tokugawa clan efforts to tax their temples. Fighting broke out in 1563 when Suganuma Sada, a Matsudaira retainer entered the Jōgū-ji temple in Okazaki and confiscated its rice to feed his own men. In retaliation the monks attacked Suganuma's castle and retrieved the rice back to Jōgū-ji where they barricaded themselves. When Motoyasu sent messengers to their temple to investigate the disorder they were executed. In another incident, Ikki samurai attacked a merchant in the temple town of Honshō-ji. Motoyasu launched a raid against the temple but was defeated.^[1]

In the next year on February, the Ikko Ikki forces also attacked Okazaki Castle, which resisted by the forces which led by Ieyasu himself, and a battle ensued at Batougahara (Azukizaka).^[1]

Battle

The Matsudaira residence was in the castle of Okazaki

On 15 February 1564, Motoyasu had decided to concentrate his forces in eliminating the Ikki from Mikawa and had sought the help of warrior monks from the temple of Daiju-ji with whom he enjoyed good relations. In the Ikki ranks were some of Motoyasu's vassals, like Honda Masanobu and Natsume Yoshinobu, who had turned over to the Ikki rebellion on religious sympathy.

The battle was fierce and Motoyasu took the field personally, issuing challenges to enemy samurai and fighting in the front line where he received several bullets that pierced his armour but failed to wound him.^[2]^[3]

Aftermath

Motoyasu's brave conduct in the battle convinced many of the samurai turncoats in the Ikko to switch sides and the Ikkō were defeated. Nevertheless, the battle did not spell the end of the Ikki in Mikawa, Motoyasu continued his campaign to pacify the Mikawa province from the Ikki.^{[citation needed]}

Analysis

Throughout most of history, it was thought that this war of suppression was a sign of Tokugawa Ieyasu religious intolerance towards Jōdo Shinshū Buddhism which practiced and observed by Ikkō sect.^[4]

However, this view was challenged by Watanabe Daimon from Bukkyo University institute, who argues the prime motivation of this suppression were purely secular. There are two theories as for the Ikkō uprising broke out in Mikawa. The first was the violation of the privilege of non-entry (Ieyasu violated the privilege of non-entry held by Ikkō sect temples. While the second was the monopoly of economical commerce, transportations, and other authority orders by Ieyasu in that territory, which previousl held by the Ikkō sect temples.^[4] Considering the second one, Daimon argues this was the most likely explanation of this war, as now Ikkō sect temples became bases of opposition against the Tokugawa clan jurisdiction. This further complicated the situation by the fact that not only Ieyasu's own vassals, but this religious uprising also brought on other Mikawa local lords such as Kira Yoshiaki and Yoshihiro Arakawa. Thus, the nature of the uprising gradually changed from religious issue into secular rebellions by many enemies of Tokugawa clan. Daimon added that it was natural if Ieyasu would respond accordingly by force.^[4] Daimon also concluded with the fact that three years later after the rebellion suppressed, Ieyasu started to allow the Ikko sect to continue to propagate, as he felt that the situation was already stable enough to allow the Ikkō temples reopened.^[4]

Historian Hamada Kōichirō stated that there is a theory that Ieyasu intentionally orchestrated the Ikkō-ikki uprising to break out, so the Tokugawa clan has Casus belli to launch military campaign in their effort to centralize control of Mikawa. This new theory was based to the fact that there are several depictions of samurai rebels retreated without fighting when Ieyasu marching out personally to the battlefield.^[5]

References

^ ^a ^b ^c Yasutsune Owada (小和田泰経) (2023). "安城と徳川家康と三河一向一揆　─天下人・徳川家康を苦しめた安城の人々─" [Anjo, Tokugawa Ieyasu, and the Mikawa Ikko Ikki ─The people of Anjo who tormented the ruler of Japan, Tokugawa Ieyasu─]. Rekishijin (in Japanese). ABC, ARC, inc. Retrieved 23 June 2024.
^ Turnbull, Stephen (1998). The Samurai Sourcebook. Cassell & Co. p. 216. ISBN 1854095234.
^ Turnbull, Stephen R. (1977). The Samurai: A Military History. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co. p. 144.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Watanabe Daimon (2023). "家康は宗教弾圧の一環として、三河一向一揆と戦ったのか". yahoo.co.jp/expert/ (in Japanese). 2024 渡邊大門無断転載を禁じます。 © LY Corporation. Retrieved 3 June 2024.
^ Hamada Kōichirō (濱田浩一郎); Rekishijin Editorial Department (2023). "三河一向一揆の鎮圧後、徳川家康はなぜ離反した家臣に寛大だったのか？" [After suppressing the Mikawa Ikko Ikki uprising, why was Tokugawa Ieyasu lenient towards his defecting retainers?]. Rekishijin (in Japanese). ABC ARC, inc. Retrieved 24 June 2024. From "The Truth About Tokugawa Ieyasu" in the February 2023 issue of Rekishijin article

Bibliography

Turnbull, Stephen. (1996). Samurai warfare. CASSEL IMPRINT.
Turnbull, Stephen. (2003). Japanese Warrior Monks AD 949-1603. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.
Turnbull, Stephen. (2008). Samurai Armies 1467–1649. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.
Turnbull, Stephen. (2010). Samurai Armies 1467–1649. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.