Dismissed owing to intrigues at the Ottoman court, he was reinstated in Bucharest (1798–1801). In 1799, he passed a resolution ending the labor conflict at the cloth factory in Pociovaliște (presently part of Bucharest).[6] After reforming its system of worker employment and payment, as well as hiring Saxon experts from Transylvania to manage the industry, he denied the workers' request to institute two weeks off for each week of labor, and ordered activities to be resumed, while stressing that it was imperative to respect the Ottoman demand for textiles (see Labor movement in Romania).[7] At the time, the employees did not receive payment, but worked in exchange for tax exemptions.[7]
Over the following year, Mourouzis had to deal with the incursion of Pazvantoğlu's rebellious troops in Oltenia, which resulted in the plundering and burning down much of the city of Craiova.[8] News of the Craiova's destruction reached Bucharest and Mourouzis forbade fleeing the city; however, this did not prevent the boyars from sending their wealth into Habsburg lands for safekeeping.[9] Mourouzis built fortifications on the road to Craiova and on the banks of Olt River; he attacked Pazvantoğlu's troops, who used the city's ruins as barricades — after several days of fighting, Pazvantoğlu and his troops fled Craiova and returned to Vidin.[10] Powerless against the latter's destructive attacks, he asked to be relieved of his position, and, in a highly unusual gesture, paid off Ottoman authorities in exchange for his own replacement.[11]
Mustafa IV ordered Mourouzis to be sent to the galleys, but he was pardoned soon after.[4] He died at his home in Constantinople, and rumor had it that he was poisoned.[4]
Achievements
Mourouzis was an Enlightenment prince, whose time on the two thrones was connected with modernization. The prince belonged to the Freemasonry, having affiliated with two separate Lodges: in 1773, he was a member of the one active in the Transylvanian city of Hermannstadt, and, after 1803, belonged to the Moldavian Freemason branch in Galați.[4] His Western contacts and his political ideals were probably connected with the goal of uniting the two Danubian Principalities under a single prince, as a symbolic legacy of Dacia: an 1800 atlas published in Vienna referred to his two rules as a single leadership of "the two Dacias".[4] As local legislation was primarily based on Byzantine law, he acknowledged the importance given to the Hexabiblos of 14th century Byzantine jurist Konstantinos Armenopoulos, and ordered it to be translated into Romanian — although it failed to become official law in Wallachia, the Hexabiblos was widely used for reference by the Bucharest Divan.[13]
During his rules in Bucharest, Mourouzis notably rebuilt the princely residence of Curtea Nouă, instituted a boyar office as centralized tax collection in the capital city, and increased the water supply by tapping sources in the Cotroceni area.[14] His interest in waterworks was also manifested during his stay in Moldavia, where he tapped water and built a reservoir for the capital Iași[15] (through a system leading up to Golia Monastery)[16] and provided Focșani with water from over the Milcov River (achieved following an understanding with Wallachia's Alexander Ypsilantis).[4] It was in 1793 that the first modern retailing firm was inaugurated in Wallachia, maintained by the Frenchman Hortolan.[4]
Under his rules, Wallachian and Moldavian ships for navigation on the Danube were built at newly created shipyards.[4] He also organized the first mail delivery system in Moldavia.[4] Like his father before him, Alexander Mourouzis founded schools and donated six-year scholarships for disadvantaged children.[17] Among the educational institutions he created was the Orthodoxseminary in Iași's Socola Monastery.[4] He took a personal interest in scientific education, and attended experiments in physics at the Moldavian capital's Princely School.[4]
During his first reign over Moldavia, Mourouzis notably passed a resolution clarifying the surface of land which boyars were required to allocate to peasants working on their estates. It is the first document to divide agricultural workers into the three traditional categories, based on the number of oxen owned, of fruntași ("foremost people"), mijlocași ("middle people") and codași ("backward people").[18] At the time, it was recorded that associations of fruntași could function as estate leaseholders in the service of boyars or Orthodox monasteries.[19] This right was suppressed in 1815.[20]
In cultural references
Mourouzis was the recipient of a panegyric authored by the Moldavian boyar poet Costache Conachi, who praised the prince's achievements in hydrotechnics.[16] Comments made on the poem, published by the Romantic nationalistGheorghe Sion, were the subject of an 1873 disagreement between him and literary critic Titu Maiorescu. The latter placed Sion's essay among his examples of "inebriation with words" (a term which he and the Junimea society had coined as a definition for incoherent and needlessly subjective criticism).[16]
Neagu Djuvara. Între Orient și Occident. Țările române la începutul epocii moderne ("Between Orient and Occident. The Romanian Lands at the Beginning of the Modern Era"), Humanitas, Bucharest, 1995.
Constantin C. Giurescu. Istoria Bucureștilor. Din cele mai vechi timpuri pînă în zilele noastre ("History of Bucharest. From the Earliest Times until Our Day"), Editura Pentru Literatură, Bucharest, 1966.
Ștefan Ionescu. Bucureștii în vremea fanarioților ("Bucharest in the Time of the Phanariotes"), Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1974.
Georgeta Penelea Filitti. "Cronici de familie. Moruzi: din satul Moruzanda - în scaunele domnești de la București și Iași" ("Family Chronicles. Moruzi: from Moruzanda Village to the Princely Thrones in Bucharest and Iași"), in Magazin Istoric, March 1997, pp. 59–63.
Further reading
Florin Marinescu. Etude genealogique sur la famille Mourouzi ("Genealogical Study of the Mourouzis Family"), Centre de Recherches Néohelléniques, Athens, 1987.
