PROFILPELAJAR.COM

The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2007. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.^[1]

Reasons

Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
Kingstreet Investments Ltd v Province of New Brunswick (Department of Finance), 2007 SCC 1 [1]	June 20, 2006	January 11, 2007		x
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue), 2007 SCC 2 [2]	April 19, 2006	January 19, 2007
Double N Earthmovers Ltd v Edmonton (City), 2007 SCC 3 [3]	June 16, 2006	January 25, 2007
McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v Syndicat des employés de l'Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4 [4]	April 12, 2006	January 26, 2007
R v Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5 [5]	May 12, 2006	January 31, 2007
R v Trochym, 2007 SCC 6 [6]	May 9, 2006	February 1, 2007
Resurfice Corp v Hanke, 2007 SCC 7 [7]	December 12, 2006	February 8, 2007
Dickie v Dickie, 2007 SCC 8 [8]	January 17, 2007	February 9, 2007
Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 [9]	June 13, 2006	February 23, 2007
Canada (AG) v Hislop, 2007 SCC 10 [10]	May 16, 2006	March 1, 2007
Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
R v Spencer, 2007 SCC 11 [11]	October 17, 2006	March 8, 2007
R v Bryan, 2007 SCC 12 [12]	October 16, 2006	March 15, 2007
Phoenix Bulk Carriers Ltd v Kremikovtzi Trade, 2007 SCC 13 [13]	February 14, 2007	March 16, 2007
Lévis (City) v Fraternité des policiers de Lévis Inc, 2007 SCC 14 [14]	November 7, 2006	March 22, 2007					1	1	2
Council of Canadians with Disabilities v Via Rail Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 15 [15]	may 19. 2006	March 23, 2007
Ambroise Joseph McKay v Her Majesty the Queen, 2007 SCC 16 [16]		March 23, 2007
Pecore v Pecore, 2007 SCC 17 [17]	December 6, 2006	May 3, 2007
Madsen Estate v Saylor, 2007 SCC 18 [18]	December 7, 2006	May 3, 2007
Dunne v Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue), 2007 SCC 19 [19]	February 21, 2007	May 10, 2007
Impulsora Turistica de Occidente, SA de CV v Transat Tours Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 20 [20]	April 25. 2007	May 25, 2007
Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
British Columbia (AG) v Christie, 2007 SCC 21 [21]	March 21, 2007	May 25, 2007
Canadian Western Bank v Alberta, 2007 SCC 22 [22]	April 11, 2006	May 31, 2007
British Columbia (AG) v Lafarge Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 23 [23]	November 8, 2005	May 31, 2007
Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 24 [24]	October 11, 2006	June 1, 2007
R v Teskey, 2007 SCC 25 [25]	February 22, 2007	June 7, 2007
R v Hape, 2007 SCC 26 [26]	October 12, 2006	June 7, 2007		1	2				1		1
Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn v British Columbia, 2007 SCC 27 [27]	February 8, 2006	June 8, 2007
R v Couture, 2007 SCC 28 [28]	May 15, 2006	June 15, 2007
London (City) v RSJ Holdings Inc, 2007 SCC 29 [29]	November 15, 2006	June 21, 2007
Canada (AG) v JTI-Macdonald Corp, 2007 SCC 30 [30]	February 19, 2007	June 28, 2007
Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
Baier v Alberta, 2007 SCC 31 [31]	November 9, 2006	June 29, 2007
R v Clayton, 2007 SCC 32 [32]	June 19. 2006	July 6, 2007
Canada v Addison & Leyen Ltd, 2007 SCC 33 [33]	May 24, 2007	July 12, 2007
Dell Computer Corp v Union des consommateurs, 2007 SCC 34 [34]	December 13, 2006	July 13, 2007
Rogers Wireless Inc v Muroff, 2007 SCC 35 [35]	December 14, 2006	July 13, 2007
R v Steele, 2007 SCC 36 [36]	April 27, 2007	July 20, 2007
Euro-Excellence Inc v Kraft Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 37 [37]	January 16, 2007	July 27, 2007		1				2
Syl Apps Secure Treatment Centre v BD, 2007 SCC 38 [38]	April 26, 2007	July 27, 2007
R v Rhyason, 2007 SCC 39 [39]	May 17, 2007	July 27, 2007
Alliance for Marriage and Family v AA, 2007 SCC 40 [40]		September 13, 2007
Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
Hill v Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, 2007 SCC 41 [41]	November 10, 2006	October 4, 2007
AYSA Amateur Youth Soccer Association v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2007 SCC 42 [42]	May 16, 2007	October 4, 2007
Named Person v Vancouver Sun, 2007 SCC 44[43]	April 24, 2007	October 11, 2007
Kerr v Danier Leather Inc, 2007 SCC 45[44]^{[permanent dead link‍]}	March 20, 2007	October 12, 2007
Citadel General Assurance Co v Vytlingam, 2007 SCC 46[45]	December 11, 2006	October 19, 2007
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co v Herbison, 2007 SCC 47[46]	December 11, 2006	October 19, 2007
R v Singh, 2007 SCC 48[47]	May 23, 2007	November 1, 2007
R v Trotta, 2007 SCC 49[48]	October 12, 2007	November 8, 2007
ABB Inc v Domtar Inc, 2007 SCC 50[49]	November 8, 2006	November 22, 2007
Case name	Argued	Decided	McLachlin	Bastarache	Binnie	LeBel	Deschamps	Fish	Abella	Charron	Rothstein
R v Grover, 2007 SCC 51[50]	November 6, 2007	November 22, 2007
R v Jackson, 2007 SCC 52[51]	October 19, 2007	December 6, 2007
R v Daley, 2007 SCC 53[52]	May 18, 2007	December 13, 2007
Bruker v Marcovitz, 2007 SCC 54[53]	December 5, 2006	December 14, 2007
Jedfro Investments (USA) Ltd v Jacyk, 2007 SCC 55[54]	October 11, 2007	December 20, 2007

References

^ Motions released in 2007:

Table key

Delivered the Court's reason	Joined the Court's reason	Filed a concurrence	Joined a concurrence
Filed a dissent	Joined a dissent	Filed a concurrence/dissent	Joined a concurrence/dissent
Did not participate in the judgment	Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment	Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly. Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered. Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel. An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.