1880 United States presidential election in Iowa
The 1880 United States presidential election in Iowa took place on November 2, 1880, as part of the 1880 United States presidential election . Voters chose 11 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College , who voted for president and vice president .
Iowa voted for the Republican nominee, James A. Garfield , over the Democratic nominee, Winfield Scott Hancock . Garfield won the state by a margin of 24.19%.
With 10.02% of the popular vote, Iowa would prove to be Greenback Party candidate James B. Weaver 's second strongest state after Texas .[ 1]
Results
Results by county
County[ 3]
James Abram Garfield Republican
Winfield Scott Hancock Democratic
James Baird Weaver[ 4] Greenback
Neal Dow[ 4] Prohibition
Margin
Total votes cast
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Adair
1,607
60.83%
515
19.49%
520
19.68%
0
0.00%
1,087[ a]
41.14%
2,642
Adams
1,338
54.48%
581
23.66%
535
21.78%
2
0.08%
757
30.82%
2,456
Allamakee
1,838
49.66%
1,531
41.37%
332
8.97%
0
0.00%
307
8.30%
3,701
Appanoose
1,642
45.43%
1,281
35.45%
691
19.12%
0
0.00%
361
9.99%
3,614
Audubon
963
57.46%
637
38.01%
76
4.53%
0
0.00%
326
19.45%
1,676
Benton
2,948
64.02%
1,372
29.79%
284
6.17%
1
0.02%
1,576
34.22%
4,605
Black Hawk
3,014
64.57%
1,558
33.38%
70
1.50%
26
0.56%
1,456
31.19%
4,668
Boone
2,275
58.04%
1,292
32.96%
352
8.98%
1
0.03%
983
25.08%
3,920
Bremer
1,548
60.19%
707
27.49%
312
12.13%
5
0.19%
841
32.70%
2,572
Buchanan
2,156
55.51%
1,208
31.10%
443
11.41%
77
1.98%
948
24.41%
3,884
Buena Vista
1,058
74.19%
318
22.30%
50
3.51%
0
0.00%
740
51.89%
1,426
Butler
2,072
67.23%
937
30.40%
37
1.20%
36
1.17%
1,135
36.83%
3,082
Calhoun
859
72.86%
301
25.53%
19
1.61%
0
0.00%
558
47.33%
1,179
Carroll
1,189
48.20%
1,169
47.39%
104
4.22%
5
0.20%
20
0.81%
2,467
Cass
2,232
59.82%
1,179
31.60%
314
8.42%
6
0.16%
1,053
28.22%
3,731
Cedar
2,369
59.90%
1,421
35.93%
135
3.41%
30
0.76%
948
23.97%
3,955
Cerro Gordo
1,604
69.71%
677
29.42%
20
0.87%
0
0.00%
927
40.29%
2,301
Cherokee
1,118
68.13%
412
25.11%
100
6.09%
11
0.67%
706
43.02%
1,641
Chickasaw
1,314
47.00%
1,018
36.41%
454
16.24%
10
0.36%
296
10.59%
2,796
Clarke
1,390
58.21%
621
26.01%
377
15.79%
0
0.00%
769
32.20%
2,388
Clay
779
83.94%
137
14.76%
3
0.32%
9
0.97%
642
69.18%
928
Clayton
3,098
55.02%
2,419
42.96%
108
1.92%
6
0.11%
679
12.06%
5,631
Clinton
3,479
51.74%
2,887
42.94%
312
4.64%
46
0.68%
592
8.80%
6,724
Crawford
1,589
62.14%
926
36.21%
42
1.64%
0
0.00%
663
25.93%
2,557
Dallas
2,314
56.19%
517
12.55%
1,286
31.23%
1
0.02%
1,028[ a]
24.96%
4,118
Davis
1,143
32.06%
1,207
33.86%
1,215
34.08%
0
0.00%
-8[ b]
-0.22%
3,565
Decatur
1,570
49.78%
948
30.06%
633
20.07%
3
0.10%
622
19.72%
3,154
Delaware
2,396
60.61%
1,489
37.67%
59
1.49%
9
0.23%
907
22.94%
3,953
Des Moines
3,414
53.94%
2,818
44.53%
93
1.47%
4
0.06%
596
9.42%
6,329
Dickinson
325
87.60%
46
12.40%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
279
75.20%
371
Dubuque
3,007
38.35%
4,576
58.37%
257
3.28%
0
0.00%
-1,569
-20.01%
7,840
Emmet
276
88.18%
28
8.95%
9
2.88%
0
0.00%
248
79.23%
313
Fayette
2,547
54.76%
1,170
25.16%
904
19.44%
30
0.65%
1,377
29.61%
4,651
Floyd
1,928
67.15%
623
21.70%
317
11.04%
3
0.10%
1,305
45.45%
2,871
Franklin
1,501
75.58%
410
20.64%
75
3.78%
0
0.00%
1,091
54.93%
1,986
Fremont
1,920
48.25%
1,650
41.47%
409
10.28%
0
0.00%
270
6.79%
3,979
Greene
1,645
65.75%
457
18.27%
399
15.95%
1
0.04%
1,188
47.48%
2,502
Grundy
1,498
71.54%
581
27.75%
12
0.57%
3
0.14%
917
43.79%
2,094
Guthrie
1,707
57.73%
635
21.47%
615
20.80%
0
0.00%
1,072
36.25%
2,957
Hamilton
1,305
67.69%
332
17.22%
283
14.68%
8
0.41%
973
50.47%
1,928
Hancock
517
75.04%
168
24.38%
4
0.58%
0
0.00%
349
50.65%
689
Hardin
2,223
70.55%
812
25.77%
115
3.65%
1
0.03%
1,411
44.78%
3,151
Harrison
1,902
52.76%
1,321
36.64%
382
10.60%
0
0.00%
581
16.12%
3,605
Henry
2,458
58.78%
1,142
27.31%
572
13.68%
10
0.24%
1,316
31.47%
4,182
Howard
1,066
54.00%
235
11.90%
673
34.09%
0
0.00%
393[ a]
19.91%
1,974
Humboldt
669
70.42%
250
26.32%
26
2.74%
5
0.53%
419
44.11%
950
Ida
694
66.73%
339
32.60%
4
0.38%
3
0.29%
355
34.13%
1,040
Iowa
1,787
52.44%
1,286
37.73%
335
9.83%
0
0.00%
501
14.70%
3,408
Jackson
2,148
43.73%
2,522
51.34%
241
4.91%
1
0.02%
-374
-7.61%
4,912
Jasper
3,162
55.35%
1,407
24.63%
1,144
20.02%
0
0.00%
1,755
30.72%
5,713
Jefferson
2,130
57.82%
1,380
37.46%
160
4.34%
14
0.38%
750
20.36%
3,684
Johnson
2,400
44.89%
2,766
51.74%
126
2.36%
54
1.01%
-366
-6.85%
5,346
Jones
2,617
61.32%
1,627
38.12%
15
0.35%
9
0.21%
990
23.20%
4,268
Keokuk
2,367
52.25%
1,803
39.80%
360
7.95%
0
0.00%
564
12.45%
4,530
Kossuth
781
69.98%
249
22.31%
86
7.71%
0
0.00%
532
47.67%
1,116
Lee
3,098
43.86%
3,464
49.04%
494
6.99%
8
0.11%
-366
-5.18%
7,064
Linn
4,508
58.52%
2,875
37.32%
301
3.91%
19
0.25%
1,633
21.20%
7,703
Louisa
1,745
65.04%
720
26.84%
200
7.45%
18
0.67%
1,025
38.20%
2,683
Lucas
1,599
54.46%
1,020
34.74%
315
10.73%
2
0.07%
579
19.72%
2,936
Lyon
374
78.74%
101
21.26%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
273
57.47%
475
Madison
1,823
48.61%
837
22.32%
1,090
29.07%
0
0.00%
733[ a]
19.55%
3,750
Mahaska
3,081
56.11%
1,210
22.04%
1,185
21.58%
15
0.27%
1,871
34.07%
5,491
Marion
2,452
47.46%
1,520
29.42%
1,190
23.04%
4
0.08%
932
18.04%
5,166
Marshall
3,084
66.54%
1,234
26.62%
267
5.76%
50
1.08%
1,850
39.91%
4,635
Mills
1,689
55.87%
1,060
35.06%
270
8.93%
4
0.13%
629
20.81%
3,023
Mitchell
1,665
63.65%
832
31.80%
83
3.17%
36
1.38%
833
31.84%
2,616
Monona
942
57.69%
331
20.27%
360
22.05%
0
0.00%
582[ a]
35.64%
1,633
Monroe
1,289
50.59%
775
30.42%
483
18.96%
1
0.04%
514
20.17%
2,548
Montgomery
1,981
63.90%
692
22.32%
427
13.77%
0
0.00%
1,289
41.58%
3,100
Muscatine
2,664
54.39%
1,966
40.14%
268
5.47%
0
0.00%
698
14.25%
4,898
O'Brien
599
66.56%
199
22.11%
101
11.22%
1
0.11%
400
44.44%
900
Osceola
432
82.44%
91
17.37%
0
0.00%
1
0.19%
341
65.08%
524
Page
2,709
67.07%
972
24.07%
339
8.39%
19
0.47%
1,737
43.01%
4,039
Palo Alto
398
45.80%
375
43.15%
96
11.05%
0
0.00%
23
2.65%
869
Plymouth
884
52.00%
756
44.47%
60
3.53%
0
0.00%
128
7.53%
1,700
Pocahontas
463
66.71%
214
30.84%
17
2.45%
0
0.00%
249
35.88%
694
Polk
4,781
58.50%
2,161
26.44%
1,204
14.73%
26
0.32%
2,620
32.06%
8,172
Pottawattamie
3,687
55.33%
2,793
41.91%
184
2.76%
0
0.00%
894
13.42%
6,664
Poweshiek
2,440
61.57%
936
23.62%
583
14.71%
4
0.10%
1,504
37.95%
3,963
Ringgold
1,450
59.97%
436
18.03%
525
21.71%
7
0.29%
925[ a]
38.25%
2,418
Sac
1,346
71.37%
445
23.59%
92
4.88%
3
0.16%
901
47.77%
1,886
Scott
4,322
61.04%
2,594
36.63%
150
2.12%
15
0.21%
1,728
24.40%
7,081
Shelby
1,499
58.40%
963
37.51%
105
4.09%
0
0.00%
536
20.88%
2,567
Sioux
677
65.16%
351
33.78%
11
1.06%
0
0.00%
326
31.38%
1,039
Story
2,041
66.63%
544
17.76%
464
15.15%
14
0.46%
1,497
48.87%
3,063
Tama
2,712
67.75%
1,096
27.38%
193
4.82%
2
0.05%
1,616
40.37%
4,003
Taylor
1,984
59.63%
784
23.56%
559
16.80%
0
0.00%
1,200
36.07%
3,327
Union
1,555
49.73%
771
24.66%
801
25.62%
0
0.00%
754[ a]
24.11%
3,127
Van Buren
1,876
49.01%
1,529
39.94%
299
7.81%
124
3.24%
347
9.06%
3,828
Wapello
2,846
51.91%
2,345
42.77%
292
5.33%
0
0.00%
501
9.14%
5,483
Warren
2,205
52.80%
1,019
24.40%
952
22.80%
0
0.00%
1,186
28.40%
4,176
Washington
2,516
59.24%
1,370
32.26%
347
8.17%
14
0.33%
1,146
26.98%
4,247
Wayne
1,737
50.74%
774
22.61%
890
26.00%
22
0.64%
847[ a]
24.74%
3,423
Webster
1,575
53.17%
798
26.94%
589
19.89%
0
0.00%
777
26.23%
2,962
Winnebago
703
83.89%
67
8.00%
33
3.94%
35
4.18%
636
75.89%
838
Winneshiek
2,474
57.70%
1,415
33.00%
212
4.94%
187
4.36%
1,059
24.70%
4,288
Woodbury
1,453
56.25%
995
38.52%
135
5.23%
0
0.00%
458
17.73%
2,583
Worth
933
75.42%
290
23.44%
11
0.89%
3
0.24%
643
51.98%
1,237
Wright
758
78.06%
182
18.74%
31
3.19%
0
0.00%
576
59.32%
971
Totals
183,945
56.86%
105,800
32.70%
32,707
10.11%
1,064
0.33%
78,145
24.15%
323,516
See also
Notes
^ a b c d e f g h In this county where Hancock ran third behind Garfield and Weaver, margin given is Garfield vote minus Weaver vote and percentage margin Garfield percentage minus Weaver percentage.
^ In this county where Garfield ran third behind Hancock and Weaver, margin given is Hancock vote minus Weaver vote and percentage margin Hancock percentage minus Weaver percentage.
References