Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add additional reliable citations to aid in verification of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Norwak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-11T17:31:00.000Z","author":"TheSandDoctor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheSandDoctor-2017-04-11T17:31:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mary_Norwak_(April_11)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Suntzusuntzu, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-04-11T17:31:00.000Z","author":"TheSandDoctor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheSandDoctor-2017-04-11T17:31:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mary_Norwak_(April_11)-1","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mary Norwak, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-11-26T01:31:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2017-11-26T01:31:00.000Z-Draft:Mary_Norwak_concern","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Suntzusuntzu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Norwak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-01-18T16:00:00.000Z","author":"HasteurBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HasteurBot-2018-01-18T16:00:00.000Z-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Mary_Norwak","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more references (that are not links to books, radio listings) that establish notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Norwak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Norwak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-18T18:02:00.000Z","author":"Liance","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liance-2021-01-18T18:02:00.000Z-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mary_Norwak_(January_18)","replies":[]}}-->

The Pudding Award

Thanks so much for your contribution of the article Mary Norwak. I agree that the previous decline was quite unfair, and I was glad I got to accept it. I don't actually know what British pudding looks like so if I got the picture wrong I apologize! ;) Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-23T22:45:00.000Z","author":"Calliopejen1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Calliopejen1-2021-01-23T22:45:00.000Z-A_pudding_for_you!","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you, Calliopejen1! The pudding is appreciated, and does look very British. And great to see the page finally accepted for creation. Suntzusuntzu (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-25T16:08:00.000Z","author":"Suntzusuntzu","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Suntzusuntzu-2021-01-25T16:08:00.000Z-A_pudding_for_you!","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suntzusuntzu/Miriam Ungerer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230809145100","author":"Theroadislong","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theroadislong-20230809145100-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Suntzusuntzu\/Miriam_Ungerer_(August_9)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Suntzusuntzu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suntzusuntzu/Miriam Ungerer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240224230800","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-20240224230800-Concern_regarding_Draft:Suntzusuntzu\/Miriam_Ungerer","replies":[]}}-->