__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Botto-20241230195700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Opinion_on_Zhoban_predecessor-20241230195700","replies":["c-Botto-20241230195700-Opinion_on_Zhoban_predecessor"],"text":"Opinion on Zhoban predecessor","linkableTitle":"Opinion on Zhoban predecessor"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Botto-20241230195700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Opinion_on_Zhoban_predecessor-20241230195700","replies":["c-Botto-20241230195700-Opinion_on_Zhoban_predecessor"],"text":"Opinion on Zhoban predecessor","linkableTitle":"Opinion on Zhoban predecessor"}-->
Hey, Ponyo. Happy holidays! I was wondering, would you be able to take a look at a now-archived query I brought up on the Zhoban SPI page? I remain fairly convinced that because of the IP ranges and editing styles that before he created his Zhoban account, this vandal was JohnRamirez. RoySmith opined in 2021 that it wasn't really relevant to merge the pages as neither case is active nowadays, but I believe that consolidating it to one investigation could be helpful, in case he rears his ugly vitriol once more. What do you think? BOTTO (T•C)19:57, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241230195700","author":"Botto","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Botto-20241230195700-Opinion_on_Zhoban_predecessor","replies":["c-Botto-20250102140000-Botto-20241230195700"]}}-->
Or, perhaps we could merge everything into the JohnRamirez investigation, given it preceded his Zhoban days? BOTTO (T•C)14:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250102140000","author":"Botto","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Botto-20250102140000-Botto-20241230195700","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250107172800-Botto-20250102140000"]}}-->
I agree with Roy. There are enough active cases that reaching back a decade+ to evaluate and re-tag accounts is not a great use of volunteer time. Thank you, though, for keeping tabs on this LTA.-- Ponyobons mots17:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107172800","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250107172800-Botto-20250102140000","replies":[]}}-->
Can you add 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 years on their own page I think it's time to add those years because we are like near the 2030s by 5 years sorry for asking you Chenkens (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250103212500","author":"Chenkens","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chenkens-20250103212500-2030s","replies":["c-TheTechie-20250107044500-Chenkens-20250103212500"]}}-->
@ChenkensNot done: it's unclear what you're referring to. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 04:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107044500","author":"TheTechie","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-TheTechie-20250107044500-Chenkens-20250103212500","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250107172300-TheTechie-20250107044500"],"displayName":"TheTechie@enwiki"}}-->
@Chenkens: Any pertinent info regarding individual years can be added to 2030s until there is enough notable and reliably-sourced information to create standalone articles on the individual years.-- Ponyobons mots17:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107172300","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250107172300-TheTechie-20250107044500","replies":["c-Chenkens-20250107172900-Ponyo-20250107172300"]}}-->
Didn't 2025 have an article back in like 2010 I looked on its edit history goes way back to 2006 why dont y'all do that to 2030 to 2039 as standalone articles and we are 5 years from 2030 just saying I will stop bothering you after this Chenkens (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107172900","author":"Chenkens","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Chenkens-20250107172900-Ponyo-20250107172300","replies":["c-RemoveRedSky-20250109234300-Chenkens-20250107172900"]}}-->
The article was created in 2002, however it's important to check the article diffs from the past and to note that things have heavily changed on Wikipedia since the time frame you're talking about. / RemoveRedSky[talk]23:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250109234300","author":"RemoveRedSky","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-RemoveRedSky-20250109234300-Chenkens-20250107172900","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Ponyo. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Elliyoun
I explained you the situation, I'm not sure why I've been blocked. There's a user named 'Sinclairian' who repeatedly deletes edits from others, including mine, without providing any explanation. I'm sure you would agree that a proper explanation should accompany the reversal of any edits. Otherwise, what distinguishes a responsible editor from a dictatorial approach in this context talk00:16, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250109001600","author":"Elliyoun","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elliyoun-20250109001600-You've_got_mail","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250109002000-Elliyoun-20250109001600"]}}-->
You are blocked because you continue to edit disruptively despite much advice on your talk page in March 2022 as to how to discuss your concerns with the article on the article talk page. You have multiple unblock requests on your talk page (you should have only 1, please delete the extra one), another admin will review the block.-- Ponyobons mots00:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250109002000","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250109002000-Elliyoun-20250109001600","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Theofunny-20250113212400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Brazilian_Stalinist_\"year\"_Vandal_blocked_by_you-20250113212400","replies":["c-Theofunny-20250113212400-Brazilian_Stalinist_\"year\"_Vandal_blocked_by_you"],"text":"Brazilian Stalinist \"year\" Vandal blocked by you","linkableTitle":"Brazilian Stalinist \"year\" Vandal blocked by you"}-->
I think they should be linked together. Theofunny (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250113212400","author":"Theofunny","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theofunny-20250113212400-Brazilian_Stalinist_\"year\"_Vandal_blocked_by_you","replies":["c-Theofunny-20250113212800-Theofunny-20250113212400"]}}-->
I've reverted their disruptive edits. Theofunny (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250113212800","author":"Theofunny","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Theofunny-20250113212800-Theofunny-20250113212400","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250113213000-Theofunny-20250113212800"]}}-->
@Theofunny: If you see addition socking or block evasion, start an WP:SPI using the name of the oldest account for the case name.-- Ponyobons mots21:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250113213000","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250113213000-Theofunny-20250113212800","replies":["c-Theofunny-20250113213200-Ponyo-20250113213000"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bbb23-20250114003300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\u00c6's_old_account_wasn't_working-20250114003300","replies":["c-Bbb23-20250114003300-\u00c6's_old_account_wasn't_working"],"text":"\u00c6's old account wasn't working","linkableTitle":"\u00c6's old account wasn't working"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bbb23-20250114003300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-\u00c6's_old_account_wasn't_working-20250114003300","replies":["c-Bbb23-20250114003300-\u00c6's_old_account_wasn't_working"],"text":"\u00c6's old account wasn't working","linkableTitle":"\u00c6's old account wasn't working"}-->
Hi Ponyo, I rarely disagree with your administrative actions. Although I understand why you chose to pblock the user rather than block them sitewide, based on these edits, AN3 and this one, plus their history, I think an indefinite sitewide block is in order. In addition to their repeated disruptive behavior, I don't think the user is mentally competent to edit the project.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250114003300","author":"Bbb23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bbb23-20250114003300-\u00c6's_old_account_wasn't_working","replies":["c-Bbb23-20250114003400-Bbb23-20250114003300"]}}-->
They reinstated their edit to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250114003400","author":"Bbb23","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Bbb23-20250114003400-Bbb23-20250114003300","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250114164200-Bbb23-20250114003400"]}}-->
@Bbb23: It was near the end of the wiki-work day for me, so I did what I could to start the immediate disruption but admittedly didn't look deeper in the history of the account. If you think an indef or timed site-wide block is more appropriate in this case, then please take whatever action you think appropriate.-- Ponyobons mots16:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250114164200","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250114164200-Bbb23-20250114003400","replies":["c-Bbb23-20250114164500-Ponyo-20250114164200"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Thank_you_for_blocking_the_sockpuppet...-20250115004000","replies":["c-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000-Thank_you_for_blocking_the_sockpuppet..."],"text":"Thank you for blocking the sockpuppet...","linkableTitle":"Thank you for blocking the sockpuppet..."}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Thank_you_for_blocking_the_sockpuppet...-20250115004000","replies":["c-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000-Thank_you_for_blocking_the_sockpuppet..."],"text":"Thank you for blocking the sockpuppet...","linkableTitle":"Thank you for blocking the sockpuppet..."}-->
I've suspected since PonapsqisHous first appeared that it was a sockpuppet for Spooninpot but they seemed to be behaving and making useful edits before their latest meltdown. Did I shirk some responsibility by not reporting my suspicions? G. Timothy Walton (talk) 00:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250115004000","author":"G. Timothy Walton","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000-Thank_you_for_blocking_the_sockpuppet...","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250115164300-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000"]}}-->
It could be that any SPI would have been closed without action of the evidence wasn't strong enough to make a determination. All buttoned up now though.-- Ponyobons mots16:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250115164300","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250115164300-G._Timothy_Walton-20250115004000","replies":[]}}-->
Hello there, I'm writing this to thank you for the relief that the block of Holiptholipt's IP range has brought me! If the block expires and the topic returns, well, I suppose we will worry about it then (another admin suggested edit filter to me, which seems like a great idea). However, there is an IP range that was missed and which the ban evader continues to use - it has been mentioned by me and User:JayCubby on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt. If you have time, would you be willing to extend the block to that range as well?
Thank you so much, and have a great week! Brat Forelli🦊23:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250115232400","author":"Brat Forelli","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Brat_Forelli-20250115232400-The_Holiptholipt_Saga","replies":["c-Ponyo-20250115233000-Brat_Forelli-20250115232400"],"displayName":"Brat Forelli\ud83e\udd8a"}}-->
Thanks for the note Brat Forelli; I've updated the SPI.-- Ponyobons mots23:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250115233000","author":"Ponyo","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ponyo-20250115233000-Brat_Forelli-20250115232400","replies":["c-Brat_Forelli-20250115233800-Ponyo-20250115233000"]}}-->
You're welcome, and thank you! Brat Forelli🦊23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250115233800","author":"Brat Forelli","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Brat_Forelli-20250115233800-Ponyo-20250115233000","replies":[],"displayName":"Brat Forelli\ud83e\udd8a"}}-->
