PROFILPELAJAR.COM


User	Talk	Sandbox	Contributions

Don't forget to watch this page, as I will respond here.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 15 sections are present.

SV22 Camry

I checked the Redbook source, and it indeed says as much. WP:V and all of that. However, I find it hard to believe that Toyota would use SV22 for the 4S-engined car in Japan and for the 3S-engined model in Australia. This totally goes against Toyota's normal practice. Anyhow, I don't have a source or anything for this right now, I was just trying to align various strains of info across articles. Mr.choppers | ✎ 19:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.choppers, it is indeed the case that Toyota Australia has at times applied model codes at odds with Japan. Even the two main brands of repair manuals confirm SV22 for the Australia 3S-FC powered models: [1], [2]. The other oddity that comes to mind is the 1993 to 1995 SXV10/VCV10 Camry. These were designated SDV10 and VDV10 in Australia. Weirdly, after the 1995 facelift the "correct" designations prevailed. OSX (talk • contributions) 06:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. I guess I should talk to Toyota Australia, not you... Mr.choppers | ✎ 16:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd be interested to know what they have to say. Also, here's a 1990 SV22 wagon for sale [3]. The VIN is listed as 6T172SV2209500955. OSX (talk • contributions) 16:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OSX youll have to forgive me, this is a random one...hope you are well! :) I have come across a photo you have posted of a certain car,maybe years ago... which I actually am fortunate to now own hehe, was hoping I could find some history about it as im restoring it cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NtHL94 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gymea technology high school emblem.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Gymea technology high school emblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese OEM Development Information/Stories

I am finally engaging on a project, to publicise much of my research regarding the various global offerings of Japanese automakers, only being slowed down by an inability extricate the information from locked access areas/sites and translate Japanese text. Is there a way to send you a link privately, with a password to access a library of photos and text related to the content? Much of my initial work, will concern Lexus. Here is a sample of what I have, which is far from complete. Please let me know if it is of any interest to you, as content like this I have come across sparingly over the years, but in many cases cannot provide direct links to for verifiability.--Carmaker1 (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello OSX! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox engine

Greetings. You did some edits and discussion(s) regarding Template:Infobox engine years ago and are active editing automotive related things. So you get this chunk of text on your talk page.
I am not happy with some minor details of the mentioned template and have posted about it on the talk page of the automotive wikiproject. Would be great if you were to contribute to the discussion that hasn't yet happened.
2A04:4540:1704:5F01:DCBE:8619:E91E:785E (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taxis Australia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Taxis Australia. Since you had some involvement with the Taxis Australia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Australian cars portal

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian cars portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

E24 template

I'd like to ask how to bring back this template that was made by me and nominated for deletion by the troll that was now blocekd?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_28#Template:BMW_E24_timeline

Peter 01:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may regard it as unfortunate that your template was deleted. However, templates are for use across multiple articles and not just one. The blocked editor was actually correct to nominate it for deletion, even though much of his justification was less than complimentary. Constructing data like that is not easy and consumes valuable time which should not be denigrated. Your response did fall into the category of a personal attack which is not permitted (though your frustration is understandable).

However, that is water under the bridge. If you still have an offline version of the timeline data, why not incorporate it directly into the article? If you do not have a copy, put a request on the administrator's noticeboard WP:AN for an administrator to copy the template to a suitable location that you can then copy into the article. -81.157.153.165 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Holden Commodore (VE) FAR

I have nominated Holden Commodore (VE) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. b uidhe 00:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi apologies as im new to this site

	Hi apologies as im new to this site
	Hi OSX hope you are well! :) I have come across a photo you have posted of a certain car,maybe yeasrs ago... which I actually am fortunate to now own hehe, was hoping I could find some history about it as im restoring it cheers NtHL94 (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lexus LS

A tag has been placed on Category:Lexus LS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of cars" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of cars. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#List of cars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:GME vehicles

A tag has been placed on Category:GME vehicles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:GME vehicles

A tag has been placed on Category:GME vehicles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holden FAR

I have nominated Holden for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ford Australia timeline

Template:Ford Australia timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 15:44, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Ford Falcon (BA)

Ford Falcon (BA) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 21:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Holden Commodore

Holden Commodore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Holden former executives has been nominated for merging

Category:Holden former executives has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]