The redirect Shante Advance: Risky Revolution has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 7 § Shante Advance: Risky Revolution until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatwonTSG2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indie Cross".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 04:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatwonTSG2. Thank you for your work on Flower (arcade game). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you're ready to be working in this space. Your comment at Talk:Princess Zelda/GA1 is nearly incomprehensible. I will be deleting this review to allow for a more experienced editor to handle. -- ferret (talk) 15:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining the drive! You should take a look at the instructions section to familiarize yourself with the drive and testing out your citing skills at here. Best in luck for the drive - CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 17:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article unfortunately features a few major issues. Firstly, the 'reception' section has significant problems with WP:NPOV - the article overstates fan reaction in a way that reads as a petition for Nintendo to put the character in Smash. In fact, in terms of notability, the entire secondary reception of Geno as a character is presented only really as fans really badly wanting Geno to be in Smash. This lacks the sort of depth and significant coverage ordinarily required under WP:GNG for a fictional character. Whilst not relevant to AFC, the article does have some issues with its wording that I assume may be the result of translation and require a copyedit if approved. Happy to chat on my talk page if you have any questions or would like some help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geno (Mario) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome NatwonTSG2! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:39, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Hello, NatwonTSG2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Minecraft characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for not responding to you sooner, I'm not sure why I didn't. I just wanted to thank you for complementing my Geno draft, even though you already made your own. I am sorry for the overlap, I had no idea. I wish you luck in your future endeavours in your future here in creating Wikipedia articles. Best wishes, CaptainGalaxy 23:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay and I got it that you have no idea that I'm working Geno draft and hopefully in the future, more characters and that including video game characters will be notably enough to have it own article.🙂 NatwonTSG2 (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flower (arcade game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower (arcade game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rayman M, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deathmatch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatwonTSG2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shantae".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt (Wii Sports) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt (Wii Sports) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just a heads up that I know that article deletion discussions can be very unmotivating. I thought the article itself and your efforts were of very good quality, just the sourcing maybe wasn't enough for notability. I'm hoping that the consensus can be to merge the article with one of the Wii Sports ones so that your work isn't lost. Appreciate your understanding. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rayman (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do the film characters not fit the list of sonic the hedgehog characters section "characters from other media". They are characters from other media. Should an additional page be created for characters in the Sonic film franchise? Anonymous29345 (talk) 14:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I didn't featured the film characters are because of the inclusion of the article's talk page that characters from other media who didn't make any major game appearances will not be listed. And also no, I don't think an additional page for characters of the Sonic film series won't be created so. NatwonTSG2 (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big the Cat, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big the Cat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I've been trying to find sources for it, and while there is some discussion it'd be hard to push. I don't think you should be discouraged by the AfD though, we've had many subjects on the verge that only blossom after a particular version gets enough reaction (case in point, Rayman). Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had kinda decided to not get too discouraged just because a few articles that I created got AFD. Creating an article based around a character is no easy thing. That Rayman article which you pointed out took over a year of losing hopes of the creation of the article due of many rejections to be finally created on February 2024 and since then, it like "I know what I'm doing but no matter what, it get redirected." Maybe it would be best if I tried at least some feedback with other users or started it as a draft article instead of a sandbox but as this one user described my writing is just unpleasant. That the reason why I decided to quit Wikipedia however, due of upcoming tasks and a good article nominations, I decided to stay in and not argue over. NatwonTSG2 (talk) 23:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Sims Online has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I was perusing this article, I had noticed you left an edit summary stating that a user was “probably unsure what they are contributing.” However, taking a look at what has changed, you seem to have removed several clarification tags that an IP user has placed. Normally, these tags are used when there is unclear content, so the user must have found some parts of the article confusing. With all due respect, all you did was remove the tags without rephrasing any content. 195.55.86.146 (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @NatwonTSG2: I've noticed that your review of Fusajiro Yamauchi was not done fully in accordance with the GA review instructions; therefore, I'm going to reopen the review. Please familiarize yourself with the instructions as posted, and feel free to let me know of any questions you may have regarding the review process. joeyquism (talk page) 02:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rayman (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rayman (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vrxces -- Vrxces (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-SA declaration; this section was copied from the Requests page here by me; see that page's history for full attribution. Mox Eden (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have completed your request for Rayman (video game) on WP:GOCER. Here are some tips for future articles:

• The summary of a work's plot should be written in historical present tense rather than past tense.
• You should not put quote marks over just all subjective-sounding adjectives said in the source; you should put them over the full relevant fragment of the sentence unless the source text is in some way different from the article text, lest it implies doubt. (e.g., "plain irritating" and difficult to "plain irritating and damned difficult" and "wonderfully clever" gaming elements, "engaging and humorous" characters and "terrific" music to "wonderfully clever gaming elements, engaging and humorous characters, terrific music, and heaps of whimsy".) MOS:QUOTEPOV explains it better.
• Do not use contractions in the article unless they are present in a quote.
• Linking to adolescence in the quote "ennobles the adolescence world of video games" (for which I changed "adolescence" to "adolescent", as that is what the source said) was not necessary, as the concept of adolescence has otherwise nothing to do with the article.
• "Difficultly" means done with difficulty, not make things difficult.
• "Probably" and "maybe" should not be used in the same sentence to describe the same thing, as that would be redundant.
• "Venturing" means that a question or statement was said in an uncertain way. Since there is no indication that Next Generation was uncertain about the quality of the Atari Jungle version, I have changed "venturing" to "saying that".

Mox Eden (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lankhor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tilt (magazine).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Remains failing GNG and there is a lack of reception to pass WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I would suggest discussing it on the series page only.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rayman (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 17:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kid Icarus (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Natwon, just wanted to let you know about some goings on regarding the GA review for Geno. I appreciate your willingness to take on such a task, and hope to hear back with more of the critiques you have regarding the article. However, I also think it is best if I ask for an additional reviewer as I just want some oversight from an editor with more expertise on the subject to just give some feedback on the article. This second opinion will show up in due course, whenever an editor is willing to take up the challenge. I just think some extra help here would be best. In regards, CaptainGalaxy 17:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Captain Galaxy for notifying me about your opinion of adding an extra reviewer. NatwonTSG^TALK 17:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rayman (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rayman (video game) for comments about the article, and Talk:Rayman (video game)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IceWelder -- IceWelder (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]