Welcome to Wikipedia, MistyGraceWhite! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 07:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Valery Zubov, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MistyGraceWhite:, delete your js page and now just copy

importScript('User:Dr_pda/prosesize.js'); // User:Dr pda/prosesize

from

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dr._Blofeld/common.js&action=edit

into

User:MistyGraceWhite/common.js.

Look in tools on the side and "Page Size".

Don't forget to remove the stub tags and update the talk pages. like this . Can you remove the stub tags at the bottom of the articles and update the talk page tags on ones done so far? Add your entries to the bottom list of the contest page if not competing for prizes, I've added what you've done so far. If you need further help give me a bell, cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. All of the sources cited on Nabeel Ahmad (entrepreneur) are unusable PR pieces. The article itself is not distinguishable from all the other paid articles on young entrepreneurs we get here on Wikipedia, where all the sources happen to be from the Statesman and other bought WP:SPS.

If you are being paid for this article, we ask that you declare it and only submit articles through WP:AFC.

When the PR pieces have been removed and independant, reliable sources put in place, you can click on the button "Submit your draft for review".

– Thjarkur (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is just a press release sources with other press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabeel Ahmad (entrepreneur) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nabeel Ahmad (entrepreneur), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MistyGraceWhite! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry if my previous assumption about the conflict of interest was incorrect, it's just that we get a lot of new paid articles that follow the same format and use the same set of bought sources (Yahoo finance partners, IB Times, Statesmas, Asian Age, etc). It's maybe not surprising that someone who works in PR will have a lot of PR articles about him, but I just couldn't find any coverage on him or any of his companies in independent sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Þjarkur. Thanks, I added the db-g7 to the draft, but I think it may not be in the right line or something. Can you fix that? MistyGraceWhite (talk) 02:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have fixed, the problem was that you needed to open the source editor instead of the Visual Editor to add the tag. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Please read this and understand that we can be completely anonymous when writing about the subjects. Salut65 (talk) 22:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Salut65 I have not added anything related to you or anyone else. I have actually deleted a lot of promotional stuff. Do u have any diff proving your point? MistyGraceWhite (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was in response to your allegations on me that I am working and receiving funds for my contribution to Pakistan's Pageant industry. That is what you directed towards me. Thats why I had to remind you that Wikipedia gives us the right to remain anonymous. Salut65 (talk) 05:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Salut65 no, you cannot edit an article if you are getting payment from upwork/freelancer or any other means. You are required to tell us who is paying you and what you are editing will have to go through other editors first. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ MistyGraceWhite No I am not getting any payments. I have explained to you that I have an instagram account on pageants, and I am one of the few pageant followers of Pakistan. If I got paid, it would have been great. But they have their own PR as you can see with their links. I am a hobbyist and will be till the end. People in Pakistan are happy to read about their beauty queens. And which world are you living in, Pakistan is a very open society. There was Miss Veet Pakistan as well. , learn about that in pakistan. but they were not able to sustain like Miss Pakistan World. Seems like someone has hired you to remove everything about Miss Pakistan world on the net!!! I would suggest you should disclose that information as well. Thank you. Salut65 (talk) 06:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Salut65 read the following guidelines and essays. Wikipedia:Other stuff exists, Wikipedia:Citation overkill, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:No original research MistyGraceWhite (talk) 07:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed almost 7500 words out of Sonia ahmed and miss pakistan world.

you have removed all the references which were reported by new agencies

you have elected to delete articles.

Please stop vandalism Mrs. Pakistan World. it was approved as per Wikipedia authors. --Salut65 (talk) 22:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You removed 21000 bytes out of Miss Pakistan World with so many references. over 50 references were removed. why would you removed all the controversies and only keep criticism ?? --Salut65 (talk) 01:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/beauty-queens-calendar-image-draws-hate-titles-1.156237

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/miss-university-pakistan-full-of-promise-1.266472

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/row-over-bikini-contestant-rages-1.255267

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20090919/ARTICLE/309199951/1057

https://daily.bhaskar.com/news/TOP-miss-pakistan-photoshoot-5530054-PHO.html

https://www.hindustantimes.com/fashion-and-trends/miss-pakistan-comes-to-india/story-odWOTq6n9XznoGYAl6mOOO.html

https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/veena-malik-gets-support-from-miss-pakistan-world/story-0zeONRhBUNIq40ffUT27jK.html

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/mush-mush-hota-hai/story-O4W4nTTaDOJosXceT1SSzL.html

https://www.dawn.com/news/512098/2009-the-year-that-was

All these resources were removed plus 40 more. Salut65 (talk) 01:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the page of Sonia Ahmed you have removed her as the founder of the pageant industry for Pakistan. Why is that. ? There are no pageants in pakistan, and there is only one pageant that sends contestants of pakistani decent to international pageants. Why are you removing the founder of pageant industry for pakistan. Could you let me know who is the founder then, and who has successfully represented pakistan in international pageants??? you are writing from a very personal agenda of removing everything about the Miss MRs. Pakistan pageant. why are u removing credible sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salut65 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC) Salut65 (talk) 05:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Salut65 we do not use unsourced material. On the other hand dont spam links. Read both policies, you will understand the reason behind my edits. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

News from Times of India, DNA India, Tribune Pakistan, The NAtion, The News Pakistan , hindustan times and Dawn are not unreliable. They are not unsourced. None of the links are spam. But you have removed the complete data from Miss Pakistan World. Do you have any clue what pageants are ? Can you see this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femina_Miss_India ? This page is all about Pageants in India.

Can you see their detailed report?

You removed the Miss Earth pageant from the page of Miss Pakistan World, that was all the winners who went to Miss Earth. There are over 150 pageants done by the contestants, yet only that information of Miss Earth was added. No one is hungry to add a lot, as I dont have time to look at links for the other 100 pageants. But you are removing data that is history. How come Miss India is having this data where as Pakistan cannot have the data, even though there were enough links stating that those particular contestants went to the Miss Earth pageant.

You dont have any idea. YOu have not done any research on pageants in wikipedia. Ask me? I can give you the help. Rather than you vandalizing the pages, when you dont have the capacity to learn about pageants and how they work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Venezuela https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Brasil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femina_Miss_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Universe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_World

Look at the pages of these national pageant. Miss Pakistan World, Mrs. Pakistan World are national pageants for Pakistan. For almost 18 years, the history of these pageants are reduced by you to just half a page. It seems you targeted all the winners of the pageant, the pageant and the organizer and deleted all the sources as well as nominated all pages for deletion.

Please look at these pages and explain why the writers still have them up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sof%C3%ADa_Silva_(beauty_pageant_titleholder) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisela_Bola%C3%B1os https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susana_Duijm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consuelo_Nouel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Margarita_Pieri https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_Ascanio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Griselda_Vegas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Antonetti https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_Amelia_Morales_Machado https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes_Revenga

I can give you over 1000 examples of pages on beauty queens. The winners of Miss Pakistan World have more links than any of these beauty queen pages mentioned to you. I dont see you going on a rampage to delete them. It seems no matter how much proof is given to you, you are aiming to delete history of Miss Paksitan, Mrs. Pakistan, Sonia Ahmed, Shanzay Hayat and many others. Salut65 (talk) 06:09, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Salut65 read my reply in the section above. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:MistyGraceWhite I have read and re-read it thoroughly and again you have removed so many news links from New agencies like The Dawn, Hindustan Times, DNA News, Tribune News, Times of India and many other credible links, that prove that these winners were talked about in the news for all the controversies. You have even not answered to the pages of beauty queens that exist. I will add them here again for your knowledge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sof%C3%ADa_Silva_(beauty_pageant_titleholder) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisela_Bola%C3%B1os https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susana_Duijm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consuelo_Nouel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Margarita_Pieri https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_Ascanio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Griselda_Vegas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Antonetti https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_Amelia_Morales_Machado https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes_Revenga

and I can send you 1000 more. However, you have not added any deletion on these pages and many others that I can send you, if you are too concerned about the data on wikipedia. As I have mentioned before, seems like you are getting paid only to target Pakistan, where as you are leaving these pages and a 1000 more in wiki untouched. Salut65 (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Salut65, Accusing someone of paid prejudice is completely out of line and not assuming good faith WP:AGF. I have personally reviewed many of the pages Misty has nominated for deletion and found that nearly all of them are appropriate. Miss Pakistan World is not particularly notable and thus not an appropriate basis for a wikipage about someone. And yes, there is news coverage around these pageants, just as there is coverage of lots of pageants. But announcements of winners or little tidbits about them is WP:ROUTINE and does not denote notability. I would review the requirements of WP:ANYBIO or reach out to WP:BEAUTY who can guide you in the future for what would be considered wikinotable pagent winners. In the meantime, this harassment and accusations need to stop. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Sulfurboy The user MistyGraceWhite has accused me of getting paid. Please check on my talk page. I dont have any issues of her nominating the winners of the pageant. But then she needs to target winners of many other pageants as well. However, she seems to be belonging to a conservative background where she is not able to digest the pageants that take place in Muslim countries, so she has accused me of getting paid and has told me to disclose that I am a paid person. So in return I feel she is paid by the conservative fanatics for removing data. She has removed thousands of words from the Miss Pakistan World pageant as well as the organizer. And the way she has done it is where you cannot revert the changes and other writers cannot even see what the actual page looked like.

Also I can send you pageant winners who are on wikipedia, but MistyGraceWhite will not even add a deletion on their pages - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sof%C3%ADa_Silva_(beauty_pageant_titleholder) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisela_Bola%C3%B1os https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susana_Duijm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consuelo_Nouel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Margarita_Pieri https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladys_Ascanio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Griselda_Vegas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Antonetti https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_Amelia_Morales_Machado https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes_Revenga

Have a look. MistyGraceWhite is not bothering with any other pageants but Pakistan. With the looks of it, I can tell you one thing that the users main agenda is to bring down the pageant and make it very small, however, if you want to google about Miss Pakistan or Miss Pakistan World, you will see history of 18 years and links that have shown the controversial level of the pageant. The writers who are commenting including yourself dont know Pakistan or Miss Pakistan World and hence for people to just pass a comment is not enough. For you to say that she has done right and that the pageant is not famous enough then you must google it and see the facts for yourself. She has changed the page of Miss Pakistan World and has removed all and almost 50 references out of spite due to the user's conservative background. What the user has done is wrong and must revert back the page of Miss Pakistan World and show the writers who actual care to comment after seeing the page.

And look at the pageant winners links I have added in this talk. click them and check. By the user deleting 50 links with proper references has just proven that the user is upset after getting out of her shell and realizing that this was happening. A lot of fanatical background people dont really focus on entertainment. and you can tell by the user's posts and creation of pages. Anyways, there are other users I am contacting to help out in the article and 18 years of history cannot be wiped out especially when it is covered by Pakistan itself. It is only a matter of time, the user can have her fun for now. Salut65 (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I dont even know why you nominated all of this pages that has been already reviewed and edited by so many wikipedians admins and users. And all of the articles was using the legitimate informations and WIKIPEDIA:RS reliable sources and indeed till this day there's a lot of Wikipedian that also contriutes on editing the pages. I think this pages below should not be tagged or considered for deletion in accordance. Its better using another tag like this >>> Needs additional citations for verification, Please help by adding reliable sources.

This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous. Find sources: "MistyGraceWhite" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

• Putu Ayu Saraswati has been reviewed by User:Darwinek
• Ayu Diandra Sari Tjakra has been reviewed by User:Amkgp
• Wilda Octaviana Situngkir has been reviewed by User:Amkgp
• Vania Fitryanti Putri Herlambang has been reviewed by User:Amkgp
• Zukhriatul Hafizah
• Intan Venlö Aletrino

I already changes all of the tags with BLP sources tag I Nyoman Gede Anila (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:I Nyoman Gede Anila my talkpage is not the proper venue for a deletion discussion. I did not edit the articles, I merely nominated them for deletion. If you have solid rationale for them to exist, use the AFD debate page. What you call legitimate information is mostly unconnected citations etc. Anyhow, you are welcome to use the AFd pages. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MistyGraceWhite, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Johnny Oghuma, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being a member of his country's national parliament indicates significance; consider redirecting to Nigerian National Assembly delegation from Edo if notability is the concern. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 12:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:SoWhy I tried searching for him on google but could not find anything, so I thought it might be a fake. here and here which version of his name did you use to search? I will try to at least make it start class if I get the correct name. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lead seems to contain a typo. Try searching for "Johnson Oghuma" (GNews) and you will find sufficient mentions. Not sure if it's enough to sustain an article but sufficient to pass A7. Regards SoWhy 13:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MistyGraceWhite. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Heider Al Abaidi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Appears to meet WP:NFooty, take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK  12:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You probably know this, but wanted to mention: in addition to G11-tagging the spam page, users with a username of the company/organization being promoted should be reported to WP:AIV as spam username and promotional edits. This user is a great example of that. (See Template:Uw-spamublock). Happy tagging, Spencer^T•C 02:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MistyGraceWhite. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Padmashri Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Institute of Technology & Engineering (Polytechnic), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You've removed the copyright issues, so it doesn't meet G12. I can't find the other versions you've said were deleted before, do you have links please? . Thank you. GedUK  16:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Legende WoW-a. I do not think that Draft:Legende WoW-a fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because This page is not Patent Nonsense it is written in Bosnian, and WP:CSD#G1 specifically excludes pages in languages other than English. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently participating in WikiGap Online Contest for Wikimedia Nigeria, under African Women in Media category and you have deleted my work on hours! Kindly avail me the content for further consuderation. Thank you.Loop up (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to explain to me why you removed what you did. I get a clearer understanding of things every day. I'll come back with new suggestions on my talk page. BTW, to answer you, should I be doing this on your talk page or mine? User:Jkorsunsky —Preceding undated comment added 15:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Jkorsunsky anywhere you like. If it's on your page ping me to the conversation by adding @ User:MistyGraceWhite.

Hello MistyGraceWhite,

• Keep. Guelord Mukadi Mbolela is a notable personality with his information allover the internet, i therefore suggest that his page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guelord_Mukadi_Mbolela) is added to wikipedia main space. - UGAWOOD2020 (talk) 14:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing and feedback for Sam Tabar page. He is also the founder of Airswap and Chief strategy officer of Fluidity, I just added some external references for verification on Talk:Sam Tabar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saadbhai123 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the funny reference of "debraining someone Cedix (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not testy. Happy. Happy that the article has been taken care of. In one week I moved over twenty articles off the jazz Cleanup Listing. I can't be anything but happy about that.
Vmavanti (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:LAME and stop edit warring over tags on here. The user was canvassed by a banned sock otherwise they never edited AfD before. Wareon (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Wareon WP:APPNOTE is not canvass. Stop being pointy. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of the sock was to attack the OP and canvass who he believed would be easiest to convince. Is that unbelievable? Wareon (talk) 16:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wareon I dont see any attack on the OP. stop casting aspersions, and assume good faith. I will not remove the note as you seem to be intent on writing it. I have added appropriate content with it as well. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"AfD appears as an attempt to WP:CENSOR using trivial reasons." Accusing an editor of censorship without any evidence is WP:PA. Wareon (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wareon I somehow agree with the sock here and I am inclined to ask an admin to keep an eye on the AFD. The article was NPOV and a legal fork. There was no need to AFd it. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:1AM and WP:STICK. Wareon (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wareon your comment about not telling anyone on the AFD gives me the impression that you have a fundamental misunderstanding about consensus and editing on wikipedia. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise why this is not nominated like the other articles - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariyah_Moten For your information I have added a Delete on most of the articles already. So was wondering how come this article has worthiness. Thank you. --Salut65 (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete the article "Danny Tan". I will add further details into the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmadoMac (talk • contribs) 04:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your contributions to the WP and your work related to clean-up and article nomination. Störm (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Jyotisman hazarika. I do not think that Draft:Jyotisman hazarika fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because This isn't Nonsense it is the author's name. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft article in question, the whole article that is

Jyotisman Hazarika (born 2005) also known by the initialism zyotix hazarika, was a cricket player from Assam Cricket Association and Indian YouTube He is known for his comedic skits and reactions to various online topics on his channel zyotix hazarika, Ajey Nagar JYOTISMAN-HAZARIKA-zyotix hazarika . MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite true, and a long way from being an acceptable article, but it isn't Patent Nonsense which is either random characters, or random word salad, with no apparent meaning. The meaning of the draft is clear. Whether it can be improved to be a valid article is not. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what I have done wrong for you to delete my page? The darkness9090 (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mubashir Saddique at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations such as names of organizations or products need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Beeblebrox Mea Culpa, I was not aware of the hassle it will cause. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it happens a lot, that's why I created the template. You've got a number of valid reports in as well, which is great. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here to say the same thing, having just painted UAA green and purple with my sig declining these - good to see that you've got the message already :). Thanks for the good reports you send through, no harm done. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mubashir Saddique at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kaizenify (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User_talk:Wareon. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Templating over a broader discussion by calling it canvassing is truly disruptive. Wareon (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC) @User:Wareon It was a canvass. Vanamonde called you out too. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 04:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions may differ but the discussion clearly concerned a broader issue. Your template abuse was unwarranted. Wareon (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ Wareon opinions on canvass? No they do not differ. You were trying to canvass Indian editors. Got caught. Hence the template. Don't do it again. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was no canvassing but a discussion about three articles dealing with the same subject. You got late by 5 days but still pushed your poor understanding of the policy and/or display your battleground mentality by abusing template. This whole thing speaks of your own incompetence.

So if discussing Indian articles on an Indian noticeboard is an attempt to "canvass Indian editors", then if I had posted this on US noticeboard, then it would make my message more neutral? Wareon (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ Wareon You were trying to canvass Indian editors. Got caught. Hence the template. Don't do it again. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think we have provided the best possible citation and refs for the webpage. We are a genuine company who wants to create our page on Wikipedia for reaching out to Million chesslovers globally. There are so many sources out there which can lead to conclusion that ChessBase India deserves to be on wiki. Requesting you to help us create identity for the company. Happy to take your further views on this. may I request you to help us build this if we are missing anything. Thank you for your kind support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsagargcb (talk • contribs) 12:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I defended you earlier about AFD, I stand by my first statement and my last but a way to assuage some concerns would be an open and honest conversation. Have you held any previous accounts or edited significantly before you registered this one? Praxidicae (talk) 19:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Praxidicae No this is my first account. I made it a while ago, but in honesty, I did not even know what to do with it, it was just an account. I was reading up on Léon Jongen earlier in the year and found that his article on Wikipedia did not have any of the stuff I had read, so I logged in and started editing. If you check my account, you can see this information in the contributions history. I have recently made an account for my roommate suffering from Covid-19 and he will edit from that account when he gets better, I have mentioned it on my userpage and I will take full responsibility of all edits. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock. So the statement above is deceptive. BabbaQ (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mubashir Saddique, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pakistani amateur chef and vlogger Mubashir Saddique cooks with farm-fresh ingredients, earthenware pots, and a hand-built earthenware oven? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mubashir Saddique. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mubashir Saddique), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Benefield Castle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]