LouisPhilippeCharles, do not delete this section. When your block is over, if you want to, you may archive it as you did with the section containing you last block).
Support re-instatement of block, with a clear message that further transgressions will likely result in an indefinite block, bearing in mind LPC's talents for interpreting messages his own way. Favonian (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
When you start editing again, if you do not keep to your pledge:[2]
"[I] agree not to make any more article moves without using Requested move under the provisions of "controversial and potentially controversial moves", Truly. LPC (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been told off for doing it on this page =| I like to preview work while editing, thats why I asked. Oh the pain LPC (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LPC you can develop an article on your talk page without saving the developments on this talk page, but instead saving the changes to your own personal computer. Click on the new [section button] at the top of this page then:
Step 1. Edit the new section in the usual way, using the [Show preview] button but do NOT use the [Save page] button, instead copy and past you text into a text editor on your own personal computer (PC) and save it to disk on your own PC. Then press [cancel] to the right of [show changes] at the bottom of the Wikipedia page.
Step 2. When you want to come back to the text to develop it further open the saved file with you text editor on your PC, copy the text into the cut and past buffer of you PC. Click on the new [section button] at the top of this page and past the text into it. Repeat Step one.
LPC do not save article development on this page during a block. You have already been warned not to do this by another administrator. If you do this again I will revert the edit and block you access to this page.
If it was Sockpuppetry, no one would have known, that is the point of it surely. However, I do agree, but its not like I can while in my exile LPC (talk) 00:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is the 3rd time you have violated your one-month block by using a sockpuppet to edit article content as reported here: LouisPhilippeCharles avoiding block 3rd time. Please do not remove this notice until action has been taken, so that admins following up may see that you were notified of the ANI notice on your talk page as required. FactStraight (talk) 08:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You were given specific instructions on how to build edits while you're blocked; admins have told you repeatedly what not to do; yet you keep defying the rules and getting re-blocked. How badly do you want to edit on wikipedia? ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ 18:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All access by this account was locked across all Wikipedias at 23:29, 23 December 2010 (see lock log). This was done because not not only did you abuse your account on the English Wikipedia you were also blocked on the German Wikipedia for block avoidance and Italian Wikipeida vandalism. It appears to me that in both cases, as happened on the English Wikipedia, you were initially blocked for inappropriate page moves.[3][4]
I don't know if I'm allow to say this, but I just want to say you are guys are being a little bit hard on him. I've gotten into many arguements with him and disagree on a lot of issues, but I think he should be given another chance. I think his main problem was fighting with people over names of articles and moving pages. But he's did improve on discussing some of his moves. Just wanted to give my opinion.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you joking?
de Wikipedia 16 July: de:User:Sümpf indeffed for persistent page move problems
en Wikipedia 8 August: 1-day block for edit warring
en Wikipedia 21 October: Indefinite block for refusal to stop disruptive moving.
en Wikipedia 23 October: Conditional unblock
en Wikipedia 31 October: 2-day block for technical breach of unblock conditions plus edit warring
en Wikipedia 19 December: User's previous account indeffed for sock evasion [8]
it Wikipedia 24 December: 1-year block for persistent page moves against conventions [9]
en Wikipedia 28 December: Block reset for socking [10] "If it happens again, what's the standard penalty?" -- "At that point I'd indeff him." (Arbitrator Elen of the Roads)
The account is currently blocked globally. Local wikis can opt out of a global block, but I am not sure if we have ever done that, and it would be extremely unrealistic under the circumstances. HansAdler09:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Affirmative. Regarding LPC, he has been told numerous times that his only way to redemption goes through ArbCom. As a fresh start would probably require some six months of abstaining from sockpuppetry, he's not doing so well. I Really Love Cheese (talk·contribs) is the most recent named sock, and there are almost daily occurrences of IP socks. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
moved page Azzo VI of Este to Azzo VI d'Este, Marquis of Ferrara over redirect (he was not a king or even a duke European monarchs whose rank was below that of King (e.g., Grand Dukes, Electors, Dukes, Princes), should be at the location "{Monarch's first name and ordinal},) reverted by Anthony AppleyardY
I am going through the 200+ page moves instigated by the sockpuppets of LouisPhilippeCharles that have been active this year. I have recently reverted the move that was made by user:HammyDoo a known sock puppet of LouisPhilippeCharles.
You have put in a herculean effort cleaning up the mess that LouisPhilippeCharles continues to add to daily on this and other Wikipedias -- while pleading to be unblocked using anons. Thank you! Please update this page regarding the ANI ban suggestion. FactStraight (talk) 23:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
LPC originally appealed to in June 2015 to me by e-mail after an UTRS decline, at which point he inquired about the Standard Offer. At that moment, I told him that 6 months with no Wikipedia interaction at all would mean that any unblock request wouldn't be evaluated at all before December. He then wrote back to me in December after 6 months of staying away. While I am fully aware of the history of this user, the six months of staying away does demonstrate some willingness to work within the rules of Wikipedia, and although the relentlessness with which he petioned me to unblock gives me pause, I am reluctantly ready to approve an unblock with strict conditions, to WP:AGF some WP:ROPE in the spirit of the holidays. However, this request is on hold pending his on-wiki committment with the conditions we discussed, which are as follow:
Only ever use a single account, this one (User:LouisPhilippeCharlesNew, because the password to the original LPC account is lost without e-mail)
No pagemove whatsoever, under any circumstance, for an indefinite period (appealable after a year). This does not prevent LPC to propose or comment on move discussions, and if he wishes to have a page moved, he must start a requested move discussion.
Failure to adhere by either of these unblock restrictions is ground for an immediate indefinite reblock. LPC, please post underneath to confirm your acceptance of these unblock conditions.
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! CatcherStormtalk20:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! CatcherStormtalk20:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! CatcherStormtalk20:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As you have returned from a long term indefinite block to carry on the same behaviour as you were blocked for, I'm going to stop your editing and bring it to the community for review - There will be an AN thread presently. WormTT(talk) 21:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Goodness. That was hardly an edit war. I reverted his edits after I contacted HIM to explain WHY (on his page AND in the edit description.) Good lord. Innocent. This is a bit dramatic to be honest. I have an overwhelming sense that you're jumping on anything. Look. In future I won't do anything. I've waited this long to come back. And I don't want it taken away from me again. It's not fair. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You were blocked for continuing the same behavior that got you blocked to begin with; that is what you need to address, not some "edit war" which isn't in the block rationale. This is also a pro forma decline since there's an AN thread. Drmies (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Ok. Not only is this unfair this is borderline immature. Regarding the page on the Duchess of Bourbon. The guy was simply confused about my edits and even said if he was wrong I could revert them. I did. I then explained and justified WHY. Then all seemed fine. I have a sneaking suspicion that this is all working in favour of the ironically named "User:FactStraight". The Duchess in question was a duchess by marriage, a princess of the blood to. By French law at the time. It is that simple. No more. No less. Regardless. We're not children here. Treat me like a human being maybe?
ALSO. In my heyday. I created over 200 articles on here including entire family lines. Nobody takes that into account. I also fail to understand this seeming obsession with adding words of vague relevance to peoples names and pages. If anything Wikipedia is the first place a person would come to for information on hundreds of subjects. The least we could do is try to make sure it is logical information that is not misleading or contradictory For example Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon-Penthièvre, Duchess of Orléans with should just be Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon. We can see that on the signature by her own hand. NOR did I actually violate ANY of the conditions stated by User:Salvidrim!. Lastly, looking around User:PBS seems to be a troublemaker. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Your unblock conditions said very clearly: no pagemoves whatsoever. With your first content edit after being unblocked, you blatantly gamed this restriction, "renaming" people in a navbox instead. Considering that you were originally blocked for refusal to follow consensus, this is extremely inappropriate and just an evidence that you weren't intending to play by rules. In any case, the ANI discussion is strongly favoring a community ban, so this unblock request coundn't be accepted. Max Semenik (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I think renaming a PAGE and (incorrect) links/names in a TEMPLATE are pretty different things. If one cannot change a link in a template then what is the point in being a registered member of a project that has a tagline implying one can edit anything anytime? You are nitpicking. Maybe if that had actually been clarified at the time I would not have done that considering it is such a crime. Anyway my above comment is correct. Lastly. I waited for 6 months in order to be able to return and I did that perfectly well so I'm hardly the psychotic madman I'm being portrayed as. This is silly and juvenile. I honestly am serious about wanting to help/contribute, as I said earlier I made dozens of articles and categories etc and was good at doing so. Nobody takes the time to acknowledge that do they? LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
As MaxSem said above, whether you will be unblocked will be decided at the ANI discussion. You are welcome to comment here and have the comments moved to the ANI discussion; requesting an unblock here is pointless. Huon (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is genuinely ridiculous.
Oh ok. Sorry I didn't see that that MaxSem had said that (I'm 75% blind) alas, yes. like I said above I waited for six months taking me to December without editing anything and I maintained that. Surely that is at least a tiny indication of my commitment to Wikipedia. I sense there are some users on her that desperate to keep me blocked and unable to edit but that says more about them than it does me. I'm hardly a vandal. I edited furiously the other day due to raw excitement. That simple. I'm not a bad person and I think we need to remember that I am in fact a person. There are also clearly users on here that will do anything in their power to try to keep me away. This is all so wrong. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a banned user, you're not supposed to be editing here, thus I've reverted your rant and revoked your access to editing this page. I also revoked your email access as you emailed me a similar rant. Max Semenik (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Greetings
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Hello, thought I'd have another go at begging regardless of not really done anything wrong. Obviously I have an anonymous IP now as User:MaxSem revoked my right to edit my talk page which isn't spiteful in the slightest is it. Anyway yes. I will quite literally beg till my dying day as like I said I've not really done anything wrong. I don't really get it. I edited a few pages in the thirty seconds I was able to do so. Then I have the account that was SET UP FORE ME BY AN ADMINISTRATOR BLOCK. I genuinely do not get this it almost seems like Wikipedia is not actually a collective resource but a hobby for a small collection of people who have the right to say, do, treat others as they wish. I think what infuriates me the most is that in the time I was able to edit freely (I mean years ago for the record) I made at least 250 articles, at the very least but nobody sees that do they? They just see the name LouisPhilippeCharles and think "God not him". Which is unfair. I am actually a living person believe it or not. Another thing that annoys me is the fact that I'd ensure that the page I was editing at that point had references etc i.e. proving that the person or thing had that name and other relevant information This refers mainly to people I must admit. A PERFECT example of this is the stupidly titled page called Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon-Penthièvre, Duchess of Orléans. Yes in fact she was the/a Duchess of Orléans, however her name was SIMPLY Louise Marie Adélaïde de Bourbon. I actually uploaded said woman's signature years ago to prove this valid point. I do not see the point in trivialising things particularly when 90% of the time a person would find themselves on Wikipedia when looking for information on a majority of subjects. The least users could do is ensure they put the correct information on that particular page. Again. This is unfair and I was a darn good editor and will categorically not be made to feel like I' am/wasn't. Lastly Remove the "Sockpuppet" rubbish from my user-page please, again this account was set up for me by an administrator. I had no choice in the name. I even asked for a name as LPC unrelated as possible but there wasn't time and by the time I could edit I didn't care out of sheer jubilation. Nor did I actually have time to request a name change due to whoever it was that blocked me with minutes. Whoever reads this, please realise I am a fellow person with feelings and I'm very disappointed with Wikipedia due to this. (Well more some of the people on there/here I should say) I pray you'll listen and at least try to understand. Also I had a brain injury due to 5 strokes which is partly responsible for my total inability to give up on anything/let something go. As a result I have a fair bit of time on my hands and would be more than happy to invest that time in Wikipedia sharing knowledge with others. Signed LouisPhilippeCharlesNew AKA Thomas Benjamin Harding (I'm a person, look me up on Facebook if you think I'm lying.)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Children of Louis XIV
(copied from my talk) For what it's worth, the ceaseless flow of insults interwoven with pleading from this guy has been neverending since 2015 in my e-mail inbox and other social media platforms. (Non-administrator comment) Ben · Salvidrim!✉20:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He is also routinely blocked on Simple English for evading his blocks there, he has likely continually evaded them here with IPs as well. -DJSasso (talk) 11:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!17:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Julie BressetJulie Bresset sur le podium de la 3e manche de la coupe de France de VTT 2012 à Super-BesseInformationsNaissance 9 juin 1989 (34 ans)Saint-BrieucNationalité françaiseÉquipe actuelle MASSISpécialité VTT cross-countryDistinction Chevalier de la Légion d'honneurPrincipales victoires VTT cross-countryChampionnats Championne olympique 2012 Championne du monde 2012, 2013 Championne du monde par équipes 2011 Championne du monde espoirs 2011 Championne d'Europe espoi...
Crimean Tatar-language edition of Wikipedia Crimean Tatar WikipediaThe logo of Crimean Tatar Wikipedia, a globe featuring glyphs from several writing systemsScreenshot The homepage of the Crimean Tatar Wikipedia.Type of siteInternet encyclopedia projectAvailable inCrimean TatarHeadquartersMiami, FloridaOwnerWikimedia FoundationURLcrh.wikipedia.orgCommercialNoRegistrationOptional (but required to create articles)Users26,227 The Crimean Tatar Wikipedia (Crimean Tatar: Qırımtatarca Vikipe...
العلاقات الجنوب أفريقية الليبيرية جنوب أفريقيا ليبيريا جنوب أفريقيا ليبيريا تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات الجنوب أفريقية الليبيرية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين جنوب أفريقيا وليبيريا.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة...
Experimental solid-fuel research rocket X-17 redirects here. For other uses, see X17 (disambiguation). Lockheed X-17 TypeAtmospheric reentry testingProduction historyManufacturerLockheed CorporationSpecificationsLength40 ft 4 in (12.29 m)Diameter1st stage: 2 ft 7 in (0.79 m)2nd stage: 1 ft 5 in (0.43 m)3rd stage: 0 ft 9.7 in (0.246 m)Wingspan7 ft 7 in (2.31 m)Engine1st stage:1× Thiokol XM20 Sergeant solid-fuel rocket,...
Francis Peyton Rous (Baltimore, 5 Oktober 1879 – New York City, 16 Februari 1970) ialah ilmuwan lulusan Johns Hopkins University yang terlibat dalam penemuan peran virus dalam penularan beberapa jenis kanker tertentu. Pada tahun 1966, ia dianugerahi Nobel Fisiologi atau Kedokteran untuk karyanya. Penghargaan tersebut dibagi juga dengan Charles Huggins yang menerima Nobel untuk karyanya pada kanker prostata. Rujukan Raju, T N (1999). The Nobel chronicles. 1966: Francis Peyton Rous (1879-1970...
Lokasi Skara di Swedia dan Daerah Västra Götaland. Skara (penduduk 10.700) ialah sebuah kota di Swedia barat, di Daerah Vastra Gotaland. Tanpa pandang ukurannya, Skara memiliki sejarah pendidikan Ekklesia. Sekolah tinggi tertua di Swedia Katedralskolan, terletak di kota ini. Artikel bertopik geografi atau tempat Swedia ini adalah sebuah rintisan. Anda dapat membantu Wikipedia dengan mengembangkannya.lbs
Act of removing a religious blessing A church building in Katoomba, Australia, converted to a restaurant Deconsecration, also referred to as decommissioning or secularization (a term also used for confiscation of church property),[1] is the removal of a religious blessing from something that had been previously consecrated for religious use. In particular, church and synagogue buildings no longer required for religious use are deconsecrated for secular use, or for demolition.[2 ...
Sporting event delegationArgentina at the2004 Summer OlympicsIOC codeARGNOCArgentine Olympic CommitteeWebsitewww.coarg.org.ar (in Spanish)in AthensCompetitors152 in 22 sportsFlag bearer Carlos Espínola[1] (opening)MedalsRanked 38th Gold 2 Silver 0 Bronze 4 Total 6 Summer Olympics appearances (overview)19001904190819121920192419281932193619481952195619601964196819721976198019841988199219962000200420082012201620202024 Argentina competed at the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens, ...
10,000 to 13,000 year old skeleton found in Texas, USA Leanderthal Lady is the skeletal remains of a prehistoric woman discovered in January 1983[1] by the Texas Department of Transportation at the Wilson-Leonard Brushy Creek Site (an ancient Native American campsite) in the city of Leander, Texas, a suburb of Austin, the state capital. The remains were also alternatively labeled Leanne.[2] Both names were inspired by the proximity of the site to the town of Leander, to the no...
Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park The environment of Nevada comprises diverse biotas, climates, and geologies. Environmental regulations and the environmental movement have aimed to respond to environmental threats. Renewable Portfolio Standard External image Electricity in Nevada 2001—2017 In 1997 Nevada passed a Renewable Portfolio Standard as part of their 1997 Electric Restructuring Legislation (AB 366) It required any electric providers in the state to acquire actual renewable electric gen...
Branson, MissouriKotaJulukan: Live Entertainment Capital of the World!Letak Branson di negara bagian MissouriNegaraAmerika SerikatNegara bagianMissouriCountyStone, TaneyPemerintahan • Wali kotaRaeanne PresleyLuas • Total16,3 sq mi (42,3 km2) • Luas daratan16,2 sq mi (41,9 km2) • Luas perairan0,2 sq mi (0,4 km2)Ketinggian778 ft (237 m)Populasi (2000) • Total6.050 �...
Former American cable television company Adelphia Communications CorporationCompany typePublicIndustryTelecommunicationsFounded1952; 72 years ago (1952)FounderJohn RigasDefunctJuly 31, 2006; 17 years ago (2006-07-31)FateFiled for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, assets were acquired by Time Warner Cable and ComcastSuccessorSpectrumXfinityHeadquartersCoudersport, PennsylvaniaGreenwood Village, ColoradoKey peopleJohn Rigas, founderWilliam T. Schleyer, Chairman and CEOR...
Ongoing COVID-19 viral pandemic in Western Australia COVID-19 pandemic in Western AustraliaTraffic sign in Perth advising of regional travel bans, May 2020 DiseaseCOVID-19Virus strainSARS-CoV-2LocationWestern AustraliaFirst outbreakWuhan, Hubei, ChinaIndex casePerthConfirmed cases1,356,147 (as of 3 November 2023)[1]Active cases231 (as of 3 November 2023)Hospitalised cases89 (as of 3 November 2023)Critical cases1 (as of 3 November 2023)Recovered1,354,675 (as of 3 November 2023)Deaths1,...
American Army officer (born 1939) This article is about the American Army officer. For the Swedish theologian, see Bo Giertz. Bo GritzPersonal detailsBornJames Gordon Gritz (1939-01-18) January 18, 1939 (age 85)Enid, Oklahoma, U.S.Political partyPopulist (1984–1996)Alma materUniversity of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignWebsitebogritz.com via Wayback MachineMilitary serviceBranch/serviceUnited States ArmyYears of service1957–1979RankLieutenant colonelUnitB-36, 5th Special Forces Group...
Field-effect transistor device This article is about TFT technology. For thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal display, see TFT LCD. A thin-film transistor (TFT) is a special type of field-effect transistor (FET) where the transistor is made by thin film deposition. TFTs are grown on a supporting (but non-conducting) substrate, such as glass. This differs from the conventional bulk metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET), where the semiconductor material typically is the substrate, such as...
5th Royal Inniskilling Dragoon GuardsRegimental Badge.Active1922–1993Country United KingdomBranch British ArmyTypeArmouredRoleCavalrySizeRegimentPart ofRoyal Armoured CorpsGarrison/HQChesterMotto(s)Vestigia nulla retrorsum (Latin: We do not retreat)MarchQuick: Fare Ye well EnniskillenSlow: The Soldier's Chorus from Gounod's FaustAnniversariesOates SundayBalaklava DayWaterloo DaySalamanca DayMilitary unit The 5th Royal Inniskilling Dragoon Guards was a cavalry regiment of...
Questa voce sull'argomento cestisti statunitensi è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Jake BornheimerNazionalità Stati Uniti Altezza196 cm Peso91 kg Pallacanestro RuoloAla grande / centro Termine carriera1950 CarrieraGiovanili 1942-1945St. Peter's High School1946-1947 Muhlenberg Mules Squadre di club 1947-1948Worcester Table Talks1948-1950 Philad. Warriors75 Il simbolo → in...
Stream of charged particles from the Sun For other uses, see Solar wind (disambiguation). Ulysses's observations of solar wind speed as a function of helio latitude during solar minimum. Slow wind (≈400 km/s) is confined to the equatorial regions, while fast wind (≈750 km/s) is seen over the poles.[1] Red/blue colors show outward/inward polarities of the heliospheric magnetic field. An illustration of the structure of the Sun GranulesSunspotPhotosphereChromosphereConvect...
Ця стаття є частиною серії з темиІсторія земель сучасної УкраїниМапа античних міст Хронологія та періоди Доісторичний періодКам'яна доба: Палеоліт 1,5 млн — 11 тис.р. до н.е. Пізній палеоліт 40—11 тис.р. до н.е. Мезоліт 11—8 тис.р. до н.е. Не�...
