Archives

1,2

Hi, Kenilworth Terrace. Why did you retire? Is there anything I can do? A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-08T18:39:00.000Z","author":"A Quest For Knowledge","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A_Quest_For_Knowledge-2011-02-08T18:39:00.000Z-What_happened?","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T14:07:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T14:07:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T14:10:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T14:10:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!_2","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Shackled (magazine) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-08-15T23:13:00.000Z","author":"Hullaballoo Wolfowitz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz-2016-08-15T23:13:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Shackled_(magazine)","replies":[],"displayName":"The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006."}}-->

The article Shackled (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of significance, let alone a claim of notability. Nonspecific references appear to be only passing mentions or descriptions of single images, not coverage of the magazine itself. Speedy declined with rationale that print magazines aren't eligible for db-inc, which I don't believe is consistent with past practice or the way webzines have been treated under A7.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-08-16T14:48:00.000Z","author":"Hullaballoo Wolfowitz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hullaballoo_Wolfowitz-2016-08-16T14:48:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Shackled_(magazine)","replies":[],"displayName":"The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006."}}-->

A tag has been placed on Young Classical Artists Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pyrusca (talk) 14:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-10-18T14:13:00.000Z","author":"Pyrusca","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pyrusca-2016-10-18T14:13:00.000Z-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Young_Classical_Artists_Trust","replies":[]}}-->

The article Last Three of Venus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-03-12T14:32:00.000Z","author":"TTN","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TTN-2020-03-12T14:32:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Last_Three_of_Venus","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shackled (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shackled (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 02:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-06-02T02:07:00.000Z","author":"Rogermx","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rogermx-2020-06-02T02:07:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Shackled_(magazine)_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britain's Bounciest Weather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britain's Bounciest Weather until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-09-03T14:14:00.000Z","author":"Mvcg66b3r","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mvcg66b3r-2020-09-03T14:14:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Britain's_Bounciest_Weather_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->

On 9 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maria Ressa, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. - Indefensible (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-09T20:48:00.000Z","author":"Indefensible","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Indefensible-2021-10-09T20:48:00.000Z-ITN_recognition_for_Maria_Ressa","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Studio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Studio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-16T00:59:00.000Z","author":"Laterthanyouthink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Laterthanyouthink-2021-12-16T00:59:00.000Z-Nomination_of_The_Studio_for_deletion","replies":[]}}-->