PROFILPELAJAR.COM

NOTE: This editor has Page mover rights, and is willing to do uncontroversial page moves (esp. round-robin page moves) upon request. Please make such requests at this Talk page by clicking on the "New section" tab above.

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by .

List of films based on television programs

Pinging Geraldo Perez – this is more a reminder to myself than to you, Geraldo: but the WP:SCOPE of List of films based on television programs looks like it needs to be (massively?) narrowed. Right now it's including a bunch of what are basically TV movies in the list (including some TV movies that basically aired as episodes of these series – e.g. I just removed Shake It Up: Made In Japan which should not have been included under any circumstances!). That list should be narrowed to just theatrically-released films that are based on TV series. FWIW. (And, again, this is more a reminder to myself...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also: List of television spin-offs to do the same. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC) ‎[reply]
And: Lists of actors by television series is another cleanup job... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello IJBall,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Carter00000 (talk) 02:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for edit warring.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Please up that to an WP:INDEF. This is a self-request. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:IJBall, I hope you will reconsider your apparent decision to retire after the dust settles. EdJohnston (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about that edit war, or any other discussions, but I agree with Ed. I hope you reconsider your decision, and hope you come back. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just realised that you've self-requested a block. I too hope that you will reconsider your decision. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 14:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What?

What is going on, IJBall? Why would you request an indefinite block? I hope that this request was just said in a moment of frustration and you put in an unblock request when your mood changes. We need you here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask the same thing. IJBall is a valuable resource to the Television project (and by extension, the Westerns project. What's up with self-imposing an indef? I can't see any reason for that. ButlerBlog (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, IJBall, I don't think we've particularly interacted, but I've seen you around, and you do good work, all the more so for the total lack of drama. Hope you reconsider this choice, on your own terms of course. SN54129 15:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm embarrassed it's taken me so many months to leave a message, but thanks for all your work on the project. You've been a big inspiration to me in my early days on the project and I know when I see your signature to expect an educated, reasonable and thought-provoking comment. If you were willing and able to return I'd be delighted to see you back. — Bilorv (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are giving freely of your time, a block like this can be a slap in the face, especially when it is caused by someone who is not contributing to the project, in this case a user who was indeffed shortly afterwards. I hope IJBall can return and enjoy editing Wikipedia again. If not I totally understand at least one possible reason. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 23:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Wow, dude. Me and IJBall go way back, I personally think he was a little too harsh on me on our first encounter, but reasonable. I find it really out of character for a mature person like this guy to be blocked for edit warring, especially an Admin but here we are. It's unexpected that he would want to block himself forever too. I guess he got tired of Wikipedia and wants to focus on his personal life which is understandable. Can't deny he's helped this website though in more ways than one. Jediknight15 (talk) 11:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]