Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treasure Island have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Treasure Island was changed by High Admiral JMT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907273 on 2023-02-14T12:38:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230214123800","author":"ClueBot NG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClueBot_NG-20230214123800-February_2023","replies":["c-High_Admiral_JMT-20230214123900-ClueBot_NG-20230214123800"]}}-->

What do u mean??? High Admiral JMT (talk) 12:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230214123900","author":"High Admiral JMT","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-High_Admiral_JMT-20230214123900-ClueBot_NG-20230214123800","replies":["c-TheNuggeteer-20240913131000-High_Admiral_JMT-20230214123900"]}}-->

Sorry for a late response, I see you're new, anyway, ClueBot reverted your edits for supposed "vandalism", which I see in your revision to add a supposed rumor. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240913131000","author":"TheNuggeteer","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-TheNuggeteer-20240913131000-High_Admiral_JMT-20230214123900","replies":[],"displayName":"\ud83c\udf57TheNugg"}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of storms named Pulasan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240916042200","author":"SafariScribe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SafariScribe-20240916042200-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_List_of_storms_named_Pulasan_(Septembe","replies":[],"displayName":"Safari Scribe"}}-->

Hello, High Admiral JMT! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240916042200","author":"SafariScribe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SafariScribe-20240916042200-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_List_of_storms_named_Pulasan_(Septembe-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Safari Scribe"}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Seems pretty pointless to have a 'list' consisting of only one item, esp. when that item already has an existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of storms named Pulasan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240916061400","author":"DoubleGrazing","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DoubleGrazing-20240916061400-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_List_of_storms_named_Pulasan_(Septembe","replies":[]}}-->

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi High Admiral JMT! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! The Kip ^(contribs) 02:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240919020400","author":"The Kip","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Kip-20240919020400-Welcome!","replies":[],"displayName":"The"}}-->

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119004900","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241119004900-ArbCom_2024_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2024 Pacific typhoon season. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241122155700","author":"Arjayay","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Arjayay-20241122155700-Links_to_draft_articles","replies":["c-Elios_Peredhel-20241123014700-Arjayay-20241122155700"]}}-->

OK sorry. Elios Peredhel (talk) 01:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241123014700","author":"Elios Peredhel","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Elios_Peredhel-20241123014700-Arjayay-20241122155700","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I'm Remsense. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 02:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241129022700","author":"Remsense","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Remsense-20241129022700-November_2024","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to South Korea, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{🔔 Ping Me!} 09:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241214095400","author":"ExclusiveEditor","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ExclusiveEditor-20241214095400-December_2024","replies":[]}}-->

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Spideog (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241215220900","author":"Spideog","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spideog-20241215220900-Editing_improvements_needed","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I have flagged the Discovery section of the article you created, 2024 UQ, as being unreferenced. I see you added the section a few weeks after creating the article, but since the text is unsupported by citations, it is liable to be deleted unless you correct the problem.

A second problem in this section is the statement "2024 UQ being close to the boundary between two adjacent fields". What and where are these fields? One-metre space rocks have no fields. This has been flagged as requiring clarification. Spideog (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241215222000","author":"Spideog","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spideog-20241215222000-2024_UQ","replies":["c-Spideog-20241218120000-Spideog-20241215222000"]}}-->

Thank you for adding a citation to the article. I have a theory about the phrase "two adjacent fields" mentioned in my previous edit, above. It might refer to the fields of view from two different observing telescopes but that is only a guess so it cannot be inserted into the article without confirmation (reliable citation). Spideog (talk) 12:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241218120000","author":"Spideog","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Spideog-20241218120000-Spideog-20241215222000","replies":["c-Elios_Peredhel-20241218122600-Spideog-20241218120000"]}}-->

I am not really sure about it either since that is the way the sources put it. But your assumption is also what I guessed too. Elios Peredhel (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241218122600","author":"Elios Peredhel","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Elios_Peredhel-20241218122600-Spideog-20241218120000","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Elios Peredhel. Thank you for your work on Yi Peng 3. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:22, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241223202200","author":"North8000","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-North8000-20241223202200-I_have_sent_you_a_note_about_a_page_you_started","replies":[]}}-->