Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NCOR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221029130800","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20221029130800-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_NCOR_(October_29)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Crayon Logic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 13:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221029130800","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20221029130800-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_NCOR_(October_29)-1","replies":[]}}-->

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ISO/IEC 21838. Thanks! Stuartyeates (talk) 04:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221113045100","author":"Stuartyeates","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stuartyeates-20221113045100-AfC_notification:_Draft:ISO\/IEC_21838_has_a_new_comment","replies":[]}}-->

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National Center for Ontological Research. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221116001900","author":"Robert McClenon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Robert_McClenon-20221116001900-AfC_notification:_Draft:National_Center_for_Ontological_Research_has_a_new_comme","replies":[]}}-->

NCOR (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 22:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221122220500","author":"EchidnaLives","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EchidnaLives-20221122220500-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_NCOR_(disambiguation)_has_been_accepte","replies":[]}}-->

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ISO/IEC 21838. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230124033200","author":"Kvng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kvng-20230124033200-AfC_notification:_Draft:ISO\/IEC_21838_has_a_new_comment_2","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chess were:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at ISO/IEC 21838. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

These are good sources for Basic Formal Ontology, but not for the ISO/IEC standard outlining it. You'd be better off creating subsections in top-level ontology and Basic Formal Ontology for the ISO/IEC standard. These articles are underdeveloped. We don't need a separate article on the standard itself if the standard is just defining a topic we have an article on already, and said standard hasn't had coverage independent of the topic. Office Open XML is an example of how this might be done.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ISO/IEC 21838 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 13:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230127135500","author":"Chess","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chess-20230127135500-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_ISO\/IEC_21838_(January_27)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I see no secondary sourcing establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Center for Ontological Research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230223222200","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmies-20230223222200-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_National_Center_for_Ontological_Resear","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite additional secondary sources. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230225132900","author":"Johannes Maximilian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Johannes_Maximilian-20230225132900-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_ICBO_(February_25)","replies":[],"displayName":"Johannes"}}-->

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ICBO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230225132900","author":"Johannes Maximilian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Johannes_Maximilian-20230225132900-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_ICBO_(February_25)-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Johannes"}}-->

Hello, Crayon Logic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ISO/IEC 21838, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230629140200","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-20230629140200-Concern_regarding_Draft:ISO\/IEC_21838","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Crayon Logic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Center for Ontological Research, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230726230100","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-20230726230100-Concern_regarding_Draft:National_Center_for_Ontological_Research","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Crayon Logic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ICBO, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230728140400","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-20230728140400-Concern_regarding_Draft:ICBO","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Crayon Logic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Center for Ontological Research".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230823224100","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20230823224100-Your_draft_article,_Draft:National_Center_for_Ontological_Research","replies":[]}}-->