What about Spread spectrum, isn't that also modulation ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R U Bn (talk • contribs).
AM | SSB | FM | PM | QAM
CW | ASK | PSK | FSK | QAM | CPM | TCM
OFDM | TDM | CDMA | CSMA
FHSS | DSSS
Regarding the latest revisions to the template: (See the 7 June 2007 version to the right)
Mange01 13:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-31T13:20:00.000Z","author":"Mange01","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mange01-2007-05-31T13:20:00.000Z-I_don't_like_the_latest_revisions_to_the_Modulation_template._For_example,_OFDM_","replies":["c-Alinja-2007-06-21T07:11:00.000Z-Mange01-2007-05-31T13:20:00.000Z"]}}-->
I think we should think of creating another template to complement this one. Thoughts? --HappyCamper 05:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-28T05:22:00.000Z","author":"HappyCamper","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-HappyCamper-2007-06-28T05:22:00.000Z-New_Template","replies":["c-Mange01-2007-06-28T07:25:00.000Z-HappyCamper-2007-06-28T05:22:00.000Z"]}}-->
Has some kind of error been made in this template's category? For one thing, I don't think this template talk page is supposed to show in the template category and more important surely nobody intended that all the articles with a modulation template be automatically categorized as being about templates. Anybody understand the formatting involved? Something about a noinclude anchor or something? Jim.henderson 14:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-06-30T14:38:00.000Z","author":"Jim.henderson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jim.henderson-2007-06-30T14:38:00.000Z-Categories","replies":["c-Mange01-2007-06-30T14:56:00.000Z-Jim.henderson-2007-06-30T14:38:00.000Z"]}}-->
I don't claim to be any sort of expert in modulation techniques. But from an organization-of-information perspective, I can't help but notice:
Merely looking to spark discussion, and as I said I'm no expert. The redundancy gives me pause, and makes me wonder if there isn't a better way to organize things so that those articles are represented singly in a way that covers all relevant bases. ("Hybrid modulation"?) But I'm happy to be told "it's fine the way it is" if, indeed, it is. -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 06:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-23T06:20:00.000Z","author":"FeRD NYC","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FeRD_NYC-2017-07-23T06:20:00.000Z-Is_the_Analog\/Digital\/Hierarchal_split_the_right_way_to_organize_this_template?","replies":[],"displayName":"FeRD_NYC"}}-->
In this template, "WDM" links to the stub article for "Wavelet modulation", which makes no sense as a TLA.
But elsewhere "WDM" links to "Wavelength-division multiplexing". Should this template be fixed? Rich Rostrom (Talk) 01:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230521015900","author":"Rrostrom","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rrostrom-20230521015900-What_is_WDM?","replies":[],"displayName":"Rich Rostrom"}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 3.128.226.195