PROFILPELAJAR.COM

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Amiga

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

This template is supported by WikiProject Amiga.

Things you can help WikiProject Amiga with:

Tagging
- Tagging Amiga related articles into the project by adding the template
  {{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=|amiga=yes|amiga-importance=}}
- Tagging Amiga related articles into relevant categories, for example adding
  [[Category:Amiga software]]
- Tagging Amiga related articles with a relevant Link template for easier navigation of a given topic, e. g.
  {{AmigaOS 4}}
Articles
- Improving the accuracy and updating dates about events
- Improving the clarity and the quality of articles
- Articles of high-importance that needs expanding or improvements:
  - AmigaOS versions (missing dates etc)
  - Workbench (AmigaOS)
Expanding articles
- Expanding Stub articles and Start articles
Creating/Expanding missing articles
- Companies: Amiga Technologies, Haage & Partner, Eyetech
- Software: AmiDock, JXFS (filesystem), ~~Hollywood (programming language)~~, Warp3D
- Hardware:
  - Phase5 accelerator boards; the 1230/1240/1260 blizzards and the PPC boards.
  - Computers (expanding): AmigaOne SE, AmigaOne XE, AmigaOne Micro-A1, ~~DraCo~~, The Access
  - Hardware prototypes: Amiga Multimedia Convergence Computer
  - Other: ~~Denise (computer chip)~~, ~~Paula (computer chip)~~, ~~Copper (OCS)~~, Alice (computer chip), Lisa (computer chip), Mediator PCI, Clock port
Images
- Uploading legal missing Amiga related images/screenshots.

Software: Computing

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Electronic music

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles

Visual arts

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Significance

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Significance","replies":[]}}-->

Vossanova; don't hate a player - why is Sundown pulled from the Template? I checked with Gargaj first... surely it's significant enough?

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-portrait_or_landscape?-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?","c-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?"],"text":"portrait or landscape?","linkableTitle":"portrait or landscape?"}-->

portrait or landscape?

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-portrait_or_landscape?-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?","c-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Gargaj-2009-01-21T20:23:00.000Z-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z","timestamp":"2009-01-21T20:23:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__5__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-portrait_or_landscape?-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?","c-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?"],"text":"portrait or landscape?","linkableTitle":"portrait or landscape?"}-->

i dont think this should be one of the wide ones... do you, phoenix? // Gargaj (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","author":"Gargaj","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?","replies":["c-Vossanova-2009-01-20T18:53:00.000Z-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, I do. It seems that most of the templates covering a particular topic are laid out that way. It works like "for more about the demoscene, go here or here or here". The upper right corner is a better place for infoboxes, i.e. a summary and statistics for the current article. Plus, full width would allow for a broader range of articles, without messing up page layouts as much. If you'd like to see what it would look like here, before changing the original template, I can do that. --Vossanova ^o< 18:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-20T18:53:00.000Z","author":"Vossanova","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Vossanova-2009-01-20T18:53:00.000Z-Gargaj-2009-01-20T18:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T22:45:00.000Z-Vossanova-2009-01-20T18:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

Dunno, it seems to be far from unanimous and making it bigger is basically an invitation for people to add more links to vanity articles. If anything we should make it smaller. // Gargaj (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-20T22:45:00.000Z","author":"Gargaj","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Gargaj-2009-01-20T22:45:00.000Z-Vossanova-2009-01-20T18:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Here, I made a rough navbox template.

I added some related scenes (art, music) but left out vanity-prone group links, and kept the number of party links down. Thoughts (from anyone)? I could even shrink down the width since it doesn't use all the space. --Vossanova ^o< 15:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z","author":"Vossanova","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z-portrait_or_landscape?","replies":["c-Gargaj-2009-01-21T20:23:00.000Z-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

looks good, i'm just not sure if it's a good idea... i still think the top-right solution is better. // Gargaj (talk) 20:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-01-21T20:23:00.000Z","author":"Gargaj","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Gargaj-2009-01-21T20:23:00.000Z-Vossanova-2009-01-21T15:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->