This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / World War II This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Japanese military history task force North American military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

It looks to me like this campaignbox could probably be elminated. Most of the battles in listed are already listed either in the Southeast Asia, Southwest Pacific, or the Pacific Ocean campaignboxes. The Battle of Australia could probably go in the Southwest Pacific box. The only one I'm not sure of is the Battle of Hong Kong. Since it was between the UK and Japan, it doesn't fit easily into the Sino-Japan campaign. And it usually isn't included in the Southeast Asia theater. Where do you think it should go? If we can find an appropriate place for it, then I thinkwe can safely take the Pacific 1941 box out of circulation. Cla68 06:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-26T06:39:00.000Z","author":"Cla68","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cla68-2006-10-26T06:39:00.000Z-Untitled","replies":["c-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z-Cla68-2006-10-26T06:39:00.000Z"]}}-->

I think Template:Campaignbox Pacific 1941 should be kept for three reasons. Firstly, if we are following Allied commands in our definition of campaigns/theatres, it corresponds somewhat with the short-lived American-British-Dutch-Australian Command, which preceded the three Allied supreme commands formed in mid-1942 --- the Pacific Ocean Areas (command), South West Pacific Area (command) and the South East Asia Command. Second, I also think that if we combine the Pacific 1941 items in the other two (or three) they will become too big and unwieldly. Third, "Pacific 1941" covers the period of the Japanese offensives up to and including Midway, after which the tide of war turned. Thanks, Grant65 | Talk 07:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z","author":"Grant65","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z-Cla68-2006-10-26T06:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Grant65-2006-11-18T10:43:00.000Z-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z","c-Grant65-2006-11-18T10:48:00.000Z-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

I have now created Template:Campaignbox Netherlands East Indies‎. Grant65 | Talk 10:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-11-18T10:43:00.000Z","author":"Grant65","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Grant65-2006-11-18T10:43:00.000Z-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

But for some reason it's appearing as a redlink here. Hmmm. Grant65 | Talk 10:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2006-11-18T10:48:00.000Z","author":"Grant65","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Grant65-2006-11-18T10:48:00.000Z-Grant65-2006-10-26T07:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->