There is only a single species S. darevskii,[3] and Slavoia has been suggested to be the oldest known relative of amphisbaenians.
Description
The structure of the skull of Slavoia suggests that it may have had a fossorial (burrowing) lifestyle,[4][5] and when fully grown, it likely grew up to 12 centimetres (4.7 in) long.[6]
Slavoia is known from several specimens including the holotype ZPAL MgR-I/8,[3] mostly made up of incomplete skulls and skeletons, and it has therefore been possible to reconstruct its appearance.[5]Slavoia is characterized by a skull with a very compact structure, and the orbits were small, the parietal hole was small or non-existent. The teeth, pleurodonts, were robust. The premaxilla had five teeth, while the maxilla and jaw had seven or eight. The lacrimal bone was greatly reduced, and there were 26 presacral vertebrae, equipped with an anteriorly hollow vertebral centre (procelus).[3] Relative to most lizards, the limbs were relatively small, and the body was elongated, suggested to be adaptations for a burrowing lifestyle. The first digit of the hand had hyperphalangy (the presence of additional phalange bones).[5]
Classification
Alifanov (1993), Gao and Norell (2000), Kearney (2003) and Bolet et al. (2022) placed Slavoia within Scincomorpha.[7][8][9][10] Conrad (2008) placed in a clade containing Lacertoidea+Scincomorpha.[11] Tałanda (2016, 2017), who provided a new description of the genus, placed it as a stem-group relative of amphisbaenians within Lacertoidea.[12][5]
References
^Alifanov V. R. (2000) The fossil record of Cretaceous lizards from Mongolia, The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia, 368-389
^"Slavoia". Nix Illustration. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
^Alifanov, Vladimir. (1993). Some peculiarities of the Cretaceous and Palaeogene lizard faunas of the Mongolian People's Republic. Kaupia. 3. 9-13.
^Gao, K.-Q. M. A. Norell. (2000) Taxonomic composition and systematics of Late Cretaceous lizard assemblages from Ukhaa Tolgod and adjacent localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert. "Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History". 249, s. 1-118,
^Kearney, M. (2003) The phylogenetic position of Sineoamphisbaena hexatabularis reexamined. "Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology". 23, s. 394-403,
^Conrad, J. L.. (2008) Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. "Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History". 310, s. 1-182,