The generic identification was doubted by the PhD thesis of Noè (2001),[3] but it was not until at least 2021 that the holotype began to be rigorously reexamined by Sven Sachs of the Bielefeld Natural History Museum.[4] Sachs published his results in a 2023 multi-authored study, which found that MNHNL BU159 belonged to a more derived lineage than Simolestes. This thus warranted a new genus, which they named Lorrainosaurus, a portmanteau of the type locality Lorraine and Ancient Greekσαῦρος (sauros, "reptile").[2]
Description
Lorrainosaurus was a fairly small pliosaur. When extrapolating the length of the holotype's full-length mandible (133 centimeters (52 in)) to the proportions of the closely related Stenorhynchosaurus, which is represented by a near-complete skeleton with a mandible close to one-third of the total animal's length,[a] a total length of 4.66 meters (15.3 ft) for L. keileni can be estimated.[2][5]
^Inferred from Páramo-Fonseca et al. (2019), which estimated the total length of a Stenorhynchosaurus specimen with a 200 cm (79 in) mandible to be 7.00 meters (22.97 ft).[5] This makes the mandible about 28.6% of the total length.
References
^Ogg, J.G.; Hinnov, L.A.; Huang, C. (2012). "Jurassic". In Gradstein, F.M.; Ogg, J.G.; Schmitz, M.D.; Ogg, G.M. (eds.). The Geologic Time Scale. pp. 731–791. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59425-9.00026-3.
^ abPáramo-Fonseca, M.E.; Benavides-Cabra, C.D.; Gutiérrez, I.E. (2019). "A new specimen of Stenorhynchosaurus munozi Páramo-Fonseca et al., 2016 (Plesiosauria, Pliosauridae), from the Barremian of Colombia: new morphological features and ontogenetic implications". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 39 (4). e1663426. doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1663426.