As a child, she had many hobbies, such as riding dressage, being involved in her church's youth group, and participating in drama and band in school.[1]
Boston College professor Elisenda Grigsby cited Piccirillo's creativity as contributing to her success, adding that Piccirillo did not fit the mold of a "standard golden child math prodigy" during her undergraduate studies.[5]
Work
The Conway Knot
The Conway knot was named after its discoverer, English mathematician John Horton Conway, who first wrote about the knot in 1970. The Conway knot was determined to be topologically slice in the 1980s; however, whether or not it was smoothly slice (that is whether or not it was a slice of a higher dimensional knot) eluded mathematicians for half a century, making it a long-standing unsolved problem in knot theory.[5][11]
This changed with Lisa Piccirillo's work on the Conway knot, which completed the classification of slice knots with under thirteen crossings, as the Conway knot had been the last outstanding knot in its group fully unclassified.[4] Her proof made use of Rasmussen's s-invariant, and showed that the knot is not a smoothly slice knot.[3]
Piccirillo first learned of the Conway knot problem in 2018 at a conference on low-dimensional topology and geometry.[5][12] She was a graduate student at the time and spent less than a week working on the knot in her free time to "see what's so hard about this problem" before finding an answer:[11][13]
I think the next day, which was a Sunday, I just started trying to run the approach for fun and I worked on it a bit in the evenings just to try to see what's supposed to be hard about this problem.
Before the week was out, Piccirillo had an answer.[5] A few days later, she met with Cameron Gordon, a professor at UT Austin (a senior topologist), and casually mentioned her solution.[13]
She stated later:
It was quite surprising to me. I mean, it's just one knot. In general, when mathematicians prove things, we like to prove really broad, general statements: All objects like this have some property. And I proved like, one knot has a thing. I don't care about knots. So, I do care about three and four dimensional spaces, though. And it turns out that, when you want to study three and four dimensional spaces, you find yourself studying knots anyway.
The Washington Post reported that her proof had been "hailed as a thing of mathematical beauty, and her work could point to new ways to understand knots."[11]
