Krepostniki (Russian: крепостники) was a reactionary political faction in the 1800s Russian Empire. It supported retaining serfdom in Russia in the run up to the Emancipation Reform of 1861.

This article is part of a series on
Conservatism in Russia
Ideologies Eurasianism Duginism Monarchism Tsarism Populism Putinism Russian nationalism All-Russian Christian Ultra Slavophilia Pochvennichestvo Traditionalist conservatism
Principles Authority Autocracy Bureaucracy Byzantinism Duty Economic interventionism Familialism Imperialism Irredentism Law and order Orthodox values Nuclear Orthodoxy Moscow, third Rome  Patriotism Reactionism Russian culture Russification Sobornost Social hierarchy Social order Sovereign democracy Statism
History Black Hundreds Great Russia Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality Russian Empire White movement White Army White émigré Zemstvo
Intellectuals Aksakov Boot Chudinova Dostoevsky Dugin Frank Ilyin Karamzin Katkov Khomyakov Leontiev von Lilienfeld Obolensky Pobedonostsev Prokhanov Rozanov Semyonov Shafarevich Shcherbatov Solovyov Solzhenitsyn Sorokin Strakhov Surkov Tikhomirov Tikhon Trubetskoy Uvarov Vikulov Wrangel Yuryev Zhukovsky
Literature St Petersburg Dialogues (1821) The Organic Theory of Societies (1873) Sociology of Revolution 1925 The Gulag Archipelago (1973) Foundations of Geopolitics (1997) The Notre Dame de Paris Mosque (2005) The Fourth Political Theory (2009)
Politicians Alexander I Alexander III Butina Dubrovin Durnovo Gryzlov Kolchak Kornilov von Lilienfeld Luzhkov Malyshkin Mizulina Nicholas I Nicholas II Pikhno Pobedonostsev Putin Rodzianko Rogozin Rostopchin Sadovnichiy Shulgin Slutsky Surkov Tolstoy von Ungern Uvarov Vladimir Volodin Yuryev Zhirinovsky
Parties Active Eurasia Party Great Russia Liberal Democratic Party of Russia Rodina Russian All-People's Union Union of Right Forces United Russia Defunct For Truth Liberal Democratic Party of the Soviet Union People's Union Pamyat Society Union of the Russian People
Organisations All-Russia People's Front Izborsky Club Krepostniki National Alliance of Russian Solidarists Union of the Russian People
Media Elementy (Defunct) Kievlyanin Kozma Minin Nash Sovremennik Russkoye Znamya Zavtra Znamya
Related topics Anti-Americanism Anti-Chechenism Anti-communism Anti-Islamism Anti-Polonism Antisemitism Anti-Tatarism Anti-Turkism Anti-Ukrainianism Politics of Russia Liberalism Russia for Russians Russia under Vladimir Putin Serfdom in Russia Silovik
Conservatism portal Russia portal
v t e

After the Emancipation of serfs in Russia, Alexander II began to have serious doubts about his course. After suffering a backlash from the Russian aristocracy for his act, Alexander II moved to the right, and began to replace progressive, government administrators with members from Kryepostniki. Ministers of the Interior and War (the Milyutin brothers, Nikolay Milyutin and Dmitry Milyutin) were replaced, and a whole series of government bureaus were emptied and restacked with Kryepostniki, for instance, the Liberal Emancipation Committees were replaced.^[1]

The Kryepostniki are known to represent "a vast majority of the gentry owners of Russia’s 111,555 estates." While some have advocated outright serfdom, the key-issue they advocated was a "Baltic model" of serf-emancipation, specifically where the serfs would be freed, but without any significant land being redistributed to them.^[2]

The party was known for its very vocal press, which made endless complaints about the lack of "hands" available for the estates of the nobility, as well as advocating for a number of things: abolishing the obshchina (the village community), abolishing justices of the peace (popularly-controlled judicial system), and establishing a "nobility bank," in which the government would give interest-free loans to the rich. Herbert Spencer criticized the party by saying "the reality is that few landlords care to cultivate their estates...[the landlord's wealth] have been squandered in maintaining the old standard of living..."^[3]

The famous author, Vera Broido, remembers the history of the Emancipation Act, with all of its reactionary rigor, and reflected that it satisfied nobody, "not even the Kryepostniki."^[4]