Ground-directed bombing (GDB) is a military tactic for airstrikes by ground-attack aircraft, strategic bombers, and other equipped air vehicles under command guidance from aviation ground support equipment and/or ground personnel (e.g., ground observers). Often used in poor weather and at night (75% of all Vietnam War bombings "were done with precision [sic] GDB"),[1] the tactic was superseded by an airborne computer predicting unguided bomb impact from data provided by precision avionics (e.g., GPS, GPS/INS, etc.) Equipment for radar GDB generally included a combination ground radar/computer/communication system ("Q" system) and aircraft avionics for processing radioed commands.[2]
In early 1945, ground-directed bombing was invented by Lt Col Reginald Clizbe, deputy commander of the 47th Bombardment Group (Light), using automatic tracking radar in Northern Italy for A-26C missions (e.g., in the Po Valley).[4] Development was by a team that included Donald H. Falkingham (who was awarded the Air Medal)[5] that modified radar plotting to transmit control commands to the pilot direction indicator (bomb release was eventually automated from the ground radar).[4] Similar to the ground training configuration in the US for bombardiers with the Norden bombsight, in a tent near the SCR-284 radar[6] a bombsight was automatically positioned over a large map by the plotting signals converted from the radar track's spherical coordinates from the SCR-284 ranging and antenna pointing circuits. The guidance signals output from the moving bombsight as it viewed the map were then relayed to the aircraft as if the bombsight were on board (e.g., to a 1945 AN/ARA-17 Release Point Indicator).[7]
Post-war, ground radar command guidance was common for missiles designed to bombard ground targets, such as the AN/MSQ-1A with alternating current analog computer initially used for guidance of the MGM-1 Matador[8] (the Republic-Ford JB-2 Loon had used ground radar guidance in 1945,[9] and a few V-2s bombarding England used radio control in 1944.)
Post-Vietnam War GDB Strategic Air Command missions were occasionally used for training/readiness, e.g., to maintain proficiency of aircrews and SAC's GDB-qualified technicians at 1st Combat Evaluation Group RBS sites. A new GBD system developed c. 1980 from the [who?]AN/TPB-1C Course Directing Central was the solid-state US Dynamics AN/TPQ-43 Bomb Scoring Set[4] which included optical tracking.[5] The AN/TPQ-43 ("Seek Score") replaced the AN/MSQ-77, -81, & -96 systems at the end of the Cold War[23] before being decommissioned in 2007,[24] and GDB systems were also designated for use during airdrops as part of the Ground Radar Aerial Delivery System (GRADS).[25]
Iraq War
This section needs expansion with: info similar to that in the Direct Air Support Center article, but with citations. You can help by adding to it. (October 2012)
^GDB radar/computer systems were also used for Radar Bomb Scoring (RBS) during the Cold War until avionics with GPS accuracy were equipped to transmit a record of an unguided bomb's release point, airspeed, groundspeed, etc. for "no-drop bomb scoring" (e.g., Northrop T-38C in 2007)."Archived copy"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on August 9, 2012. Retrieved September 23, 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^ abAkers, Marion (1996), "Unique Radar Bombing Technique"(anecdote within book), 47th Bombardment Group (L), Turner Publishing Company, ISBN9781563112409, retrieved 2012-05-26, Won his first Air Medal while working with Col. Clizby in developing a means to bomb close support to the troops using ground control radar.NOTE: "bombing by radar-control" is identified in a "19 February 1945" listing of the Combat Chronology.[1]
^"3903rd Radar Bomb Scoring Group"(Web Bulletin Board). KoreanWar.org. Retrieved 2012-05-20. On the MSQ-1, we operated in the same manner, but later learned that [for the "brand new MSQ-2 plotting equipment"] we should have entered the target coordinates into the new digital/analog computer, AND THEN 'ZEROED' THEM OUT AGAIN. The computer would remember the offset and track accordingly. Unfortunately, we did not know that without the TO's. By leaving them in, like the 584, we effectively located the target's position over the top of ourselves.
^Schlight, John (1999). The War in South Vietnam: The Years of the Offensive (1965-1968)(PDF). The United States Air Force in Southeast Asia. pp. 269–271. Retrieved 2012-06-16. NOTE: Lake 2004, p. 48, mistakenly says the "normal limit (with two Skyspot beacons) was 3300 yards from friendly forces", but TACAN used multiple beacons, not Skyspot--which used only one radar even if a non-transmitting Skyspot backup receiving the A/C transponder returns tracked or later commanded the bomb run.
^Morocco, John (1985). Rain of Fire: Air War, 1969–1973. Boston: Boston Publishing Company. p. 14.