Cladonota is a genus of neotropical treehoppers (family Membracidae) widespread from Mexico to South America. They are known for their elaborate pronotum shapes, hypothesized to play a role in camouflage or mate recognition, although their function is not yet known with certainty.[1][2] Previously described as a subgenus of Sphongophorus, it was recognized as a genus of its own right in 1997 after the latter was synonymized with Hypsauchenia.[3][4]
Description
The genus is distinguished from other treehoppers by its highly elaborate pronotum, which in many species bears an elongated, curved anterior process or an ornate intermediate process, giving them an appearance variously called "grotesque" and "particularly charismatic".[5][6] Resembling various natural elements from twigs, leaves and seeds to bird droppings, the pronotum is believed to help them camouflage in their natural habitat. Other explanations for the pronotum's structure include mate recognition, as well as providing an extended surface area for their sensory setae.[7][1] While a popular hypothesis, the use of the pronotum for camouflage has not yet been empirically tested as of 2020.[6] Despite their seemingly burdensome pronota, Cladonota treehoppers are capable of both jumping and flying.[8]
In most Cladonota species, the male is smaller than the female, often with a less developed pronotum and darker colors. More drastic sexual dimorphism can also be present, with completely different pronotum shapes between male and female, which has often lead to the misidentification of males and females as constituting separate species.[1]
The primary predators of Cladonota are birds, from which their pronotum shapes are believed to help camouflage.[9]
Most species are solitary as nymphs and adults, although some have been observed to live in groups of two or three. The ant Ectatomma ruidum is known to attend to nymphs of some species in a mutualistic relationship.[1] Ant-tended groups of three or four individuals have been reported.[10]
Males of C. apicalis use substrate vibrations as a way to attract females, and also emit sounds and wing vibrations for courting.[1] Wing buzzing has also been reported as a deterrence strategy against ants and possibly predators.[6]
The genus Cladonota is part of the treehopper subfamily Membracinae. Inside this subfamily, it belongs to the tribe Hypsoprorini, of which it is the largest genus.[1]
Most of the species now recognized as part of Cladonota were originally described as part of the genus Sphongophorus. In 1869, Cladonota was established as a subgenus of Sphongophorus by Carl Stål, comprising its New World species. After Sphongophorus was found by McKamey in 1997 to be a junior objective synonym of Hypsauchenia, Cladonota was elevated to genus rank, with Cladonota paradoxa designated as the type species.[1]
Cladonota includes a total of 59 described species so far.[9]
The genus is divided into four subgenera: Falculifera,[1]Cladonota,[11]Lecythifera,[14] and Lobocladisca.[13] The former subgenus Acanthonota, which included only C. livida, was synonymized with Lobocladisca in 2003.[15]
Subgenera and species of Cladonota are mostly distinguished by their pronotum structure, but also by their face, legs and wings. Genitalia are not distinctive for species characterization. Alongside the four subgenera, one incertae sedis species is known, Cladonota brunnea (Fallou, 1890).[1]
Falculifera
Falculifera is distinguished from the other subgenera by the lack of an intermediate process on the pronotum. The latter is usually C-shaped, with the posterior process extending in an oblique direction.[1]
As of 2020, the subgenus comprises the following eight species, making it the least speciose of the Cladonota subgenera.[1][6]
Unlike Falculifera, the type subgenus Cladonota possesses an intermediate process on the pronotum. It is covered by the arching anterior process, which does not have a tooth-like projection on its back side.[11]
The subgenus Lecythifera is also characterized by the presence of an intermediate process of the pronotum, and by a toothless anterior process. However, unlike in Cladonota, the intermediate process is not surpassed by the anterior process. The subgenus comprises 21 known species as of 2022. All species with both male and female specimens known are sexually dimorphic, with the exception of C. plummeri.[9]
Lecythifera was originally described by Fowler in 1894, but was synonymized with Cladonota (at the time a subgenus of Spongophorus) in 1928, and reinstated in 2003.[15]
Cladonota affinis Fowler, 1894
Cladonota bulbosa Flynn, 2003
Cladonota championi Fowler, 1894
Cladonota costaricensis Flynn, 2018
Cladonota costata Buckton, 1903
Cladonota crucifixa Gálvez & Flynn, 2021
Cladonota falleni Stål, 1862
Cladonota globonegra Flynn, 2018
Cladonota gonzaloi Peláez, 1945
Cladonota grisea Flynn, 2018
Cladonota hoffmanni Peláez, 1945
Cladonota inflata Fowler, 1894
Cladonota locomotiva Breddin, 1901
Cladonota machinula Breddin, 1901
Cladonota meteorus Arnaud, 2002
Cladonota orellana Flynn, 2018
Cladonota pieltaini Peláez, 1945
Cladonota plummeri Peláez, 1945
Cladonota robustula Fowler, 1894
Cladonota siparuna Strümpel, 1973
Cladonota yucatanensis Flynn, 2003
Lobocladisca
The subgenus Lobocladisca is uniquely distinguished by a small tooth-like projection on the back side of the anterior process. Like in the subgenera Cladonota and Lecythifera, species of this subgenus all have an intermediate process on their pronotum. The subgenus comprises nine species as of 2020, many of them only known from the type specimen or the original description, and thus of uncertain validity. Conversely, Cladonota (Lobocladisca) biclavata is the most common species of the genus in all of South America.[13]
Cladonota bennetti Kirby, 1829
Cladonota biclavata Westwood, 1840
Cladonota clavaria Fairmaire, 1846
Cladonota livida Buckton, 1903
Cladonota lobulata Stål, 1869
Cladonota occidentalis Strümpel, 1973
Cladonota rigida Stål, 1869
Cladonota spatulata Fairmaire, 1846
Cladonota vexillifera Goding, 1893
Incertae sedis
No illustration is known for Cladonota brunnea, and the type specimen, discovered in Brazil, has not been preserved. While it is possibly a genetic variation within C. apicalis, the description is considered too insufficient for assignment at the subgenus level.[1]