Brian Keith Reid (born 1949) is an American computer scientist. He developed an early use of a markup language in his 1980 doctoral dissertation. His other principal interest has been computer networking and the development of the Internet.
He left Stanford in 1987, he was immediately hired by the Digital Equipment Corporation, first in the Western Research Laboratory (DEC WRL) under Forest Baskett in Palo Alto, California. Reid and Paul Vixie developed one of the first connections between a corporate network and the Internet, known as "Gatekeeper" after the character in the Ghostbusters film.[8] The protection techniques developed evolved into what is now called a network firewall.
Some early Internet attackers (such as Kevin Mitnick) would impersonate Reid in telephone calls in attempts to gain trust.[8][9]
He experimented with electronic publishing with his USENET Cookbook project. In 1987, he and John Gilmore created the alt.* hierarchy on Usenet. He also created and ran the "USENET readership report", which sampled the reading habits of volunteer news readers, tried to extrapolate them across the entire population of the USENET, and reported them monthly to the news.lists newsgroup.
From 1986 thru 1995, Reid produced a variety of maps of the USENET in PostScript, showing both its geographical reach and its volumes of traffic flow.[10][11]
In 1995 he became director of his own group, the Network Systems Laboratory (DEC NSL).
The DEC NSL developed one of the largest Internet exchange points as the Internet became available for commercial use in the 1990s.[12]
One of his employees was Anita Borg, who founded the group Systers and the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing while at NSL.[13]
DEC NSL and WRL developed AltaVista, one of the first web search engines.
In 1998, he was invited to give a keynote talk at the Markup Technologies conference, discussing 20 years of history in the technology.[3]
In June 2002,[1] Reid became director of operations at Google. His only written review was from Wayne Rosing, which was positive.
In October 2003 he was moved to a program with no funding and no staff, while his former duties were taken over by Urs Hölzle, who was 15 years younger.
He was fired by Larry Page (who was 30 at the time) in February 2004, after being told he was not a "cultural fit" by Rosing, and that his ideas were "too old to matter" by Hölzle, according to Reid.[15]
It was nine days before the company's initial public offering (IPO) was announced, allegedly costing him 119,000 stock options with a strike price of $0.30,[14] which would have been worth approximately $10 million at the $85 IPO price. Reid estimated that given later appreciation, his unvested stock options would have been worth at least $45 million if he had stayed there.[16]
The court granted review to decide two questions, one substantive and one procedural: (1) should an employee be allowed to sue an employer for hostile "stray remarks" by employees who were not directly involved in the allegedly discriminatory decision at issue; and (2) are specific objections to evidence at the summary judgment stage waived when the trial court fails to rule on specific objections despite oral requests that the trial court do so. The parties thoroughly briefed the issues on the merits; next, the court sat on the case for more than a year; then asked for further supplemental briefing from the parties in April 2010 on the procedural question; and finally scheduled oral argument for May 26, 2010.
On August 5, 2010, in an opinion by Justice Ming Chin, the court affirmed the Court of Appeal decision in favor of Reid and remanded to the lower courts for further proceedings. The Court refused to adopt the "stray remarks" doctrine pioneered by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, because remarks by non-decisionmakers may be circumstantial evidence relevant to discriminatory actions (in the sense that hostile co-workers can manipulate a supervisor); and written objections to evidence are preserved for appeal regardless of whether the trial court rules upon them or whether counsel even argues them orally before the court. In other words, Google won on the procedural question, but Reid won on the substantive question, meaning that he would be able to introduce a much broader range of evidence of Google's alleged atmosphere of discrimination to the trier of fact.[24]
The case attracted media attention, with briefs filed by the AARP on Reid's behalf and the California Employment Law Council for Google.[19][25]
The case was settled out of court for undisclosed terms.[16]
From July 2005 to 2019, Reid worked at the Internet Systems Consortium, with various titles including head of engineering, operations, and communication.[1][26]
Personal life
Reid is an active photographer and has sponsored the Leica User's Group, an e-mail discussion list, for almost two decades.
^Forest Baskett; James Clark; John Hennessy; Susan Owicki; Brian Reid (March 1981). "Research in VLSI systems design and architecture"(PDF). DARPA project report, Stanford Technical Report CSL-TR-81-201. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
^Jon-Erik G. Storm (February 5, 2008). "Reid v. Google Review Granted". Storm's Employment Law blog. Archived from the original on November 20, 2008. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
Reid, Brian K. (1980). "A high-level approach to computer document formatting". Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '80. ACM. pp. 24–31. doi:10.1145/567446.567449. ISBN978-0-89791-011-8. S2CID3095110.
Reid, Brian (1991). "Reflections on some recent widespread computer break-ins". Computers under attack: Intruders, worms, and viruses. ACM. pp. 145–149. doi:10.1145/102616.102626. ISBN978-0-201-53067-4.