The son of a carpenter, Whewell rose to the top. For 28 years he was a Professor, and for 25 years he was Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. He was one of the founding members and a president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, a Fellow of the Royal Society, and President of the Geological Society. It was the Prime Minister himself, Robert Peel, who recommended his appointment as Master of Trinity.
Whewell's five volumes of the History and Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences are his major work. Science was then still a novel activity. The scientists themselves held differing views as to how best to go about their work. Whewell provided a theoretical framework,[2] and the framework provoked a great deal of debate. There was also a long-running discussion with John Stuart Mill about social and economic philosophy.[3][4]
Uniformitarianism: the same laws and processes that operate now have always operated in the past and apply everywhere. It is often said as 'the present is the key to the past'. Similar to gradualism, the idea that small continual changes add up to huge effects.
Catastrophism: the idea that Earth has had sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope.
Consilience: the unity of knowledge, literally a 'jumping together' of knowledge.
Books
History of the inductive sciences. 3 vols. Editions: 1837; 1847; 1857.
Philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history. 2 vols. Editions: 1840; 1847; 1858–1860
References
↑Ruse M. 1975. Darwin's debt to philosophy: an examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science6: 159–181.
↑Yeo R. 1993. Defining Science: William Whewell, natural knowledge, and public debate in early Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
↑Mill J.S. 1836. Dr. Whewell on Moral Philosophy. Westminster Review58:349–385.
↑Snyder L.J. 1997. The Mill-Whewell debate: much ado about induction. Perspectives on Science5: 159–198.