Scottish minister, professor, literary critic, reviewer and author
William GreenfieldFRSE (born 1754/55; died 1827) was a Scottish minister, professor of rhetoric and belles lettres, literary critic, reviewer, and author whose clerical career ended in scandal, resulting in him being excommunicated from the Church of Scotland, having his university degrees withdrawn, and his family assuming his wife's patronymic Rutherfurd.[1]
A portrait from the Welsh Portrait Collection at the National Library of Wales. Depicted person: William Greenfield – Scottish minister, literary critic, author and mathematician
He was ordained as a minister of the Church of Scotland to Wemyss Parish on 6 September 1781. He then moved to become the first minister of the new St Andrew's Church in the New Town of Edinburgh on 25 November 1784, until he was appointed Minister of St Giles (or High Kirk) of Edinburgh by the Town Council on 21 February, taking up post on 1 April 1787. He held this post as well as the Regius Professorship of Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (among the first University Chairs in English Literature in the world), which he had held in conjunction with Hugh Blair since 1784, and whom he succeeded.[2] He was made Almoner to the King in March 1789. He "radically altered the size and structure of the Edinburgh course" he took over from Blair, according to Martin Moonie's chapter in Crawford's book. Greenfield had wide interest. He was a member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and on 12 April 1784 he read a paper and, later in its Transactions (1788 Vol 1, pp131–145) he published as an article entitled "On the use of negative quantities in the solution of problems by Algebraic Equations".[3] (His son, Andrew Rutherfurd, attached a biographical note to his copy of this article, without revealing that the author was his father). Greenfield also delivered lectures in Natural Philosophy, the manuscripts of which are still retained in Edinburgh University Library.
Greenfield was disgraced in December 1798. The records of the Presbytery of Edinburgh state that because of "certain flagrant reports concerning his conduct... [they] laid him under a sentence of excommunication." Sufficiently serious, he voluntarily resigned his Church and University posts as well as that of King's Almoner. The University of Edinburgh revoked his degrees of M.A. and D.D. There is evidence of a public outcry, "a sin peculiarly heinous and offensive in its nature," according to the Presbytery, and a letter by Greenfield resigning and expressing gratitude to his previous colleagues and charges.[9] Later comment indicated he had been discovered in gay relationship with a student.[citation needed] His name was airbrushed from the recollections of his contemporaries in Scotland.
Greenfield fled to Corbridge in Northumberland. He wrote the elegantly written Essays on the Sources of the Pleasures received from Literary Compositions, which he published in 1809.[10] This seems to be a polished and published version of his Edinburgh lecture course.
[1]; In the same year, Sir Walter Scott introduced him to the publisher John Murray. Scott supposedly asked Murray to keep Greenfield's name secret, as he was hiding from creditors.[11] There is no evidence of Greenfield's further connection with Murray, or with any other publisher.
In another instance Scott's letter is quoted and his case described: "You cannot but have heard of that very unfortunate man Dr Greenshields [sic] who for a dishonourable or rather infamous cause was obliged to leave Edinburgh where he was long beloved and admired of every human being..."[12]
Greenfield contributed one review to the Quarterly Review under the name of Richardson. It disapproved morally of the novel Amélie Mansfield[13] by Mme Cottin. He also assumed the name of Rutherfurd, his wife's mother's name. This circumstance led much literary gossip, including The Kaleidoscope magazine to suspect Greenfield as the author of the Waverley or "Scotch" novels. Some thought that Scott was not capable of being the author but Greenfield was. Greenfield was a full and visible and respected member of the Scottish literary scene.
He died in the North of England on 28 June 1827.[14]
Family
He married Janet Bervie (d.1827), daughter of a Kirkcaldy maltman, on 22 November 1782.
His wife assumed the maiden name of her mother (Margaret Rutherford or Rutherfurd). His children seemed to have made successful careers or marriages in the law, army and the Church, suggesting the scandal did not affect them much, well-concealed under the name of Rutherfurd. Their careers and marriages seemed also to have been based in Scotland, which might indicate that Greenfield had left his family there, the North of England being a common refuge for fugitive Scots, near but beyond the jurisdiction. The six children were:
Margaret, born 25 July 1784;
Hugh Blair Rutherfurd (named after Greenfield's predecessor as Professor of Rhetoric - Hugh Blair), and later laird of Crosshill, and captain 25th Regiment, born 7 May 1786;
Grizel, born 5 December 1787, who later married Thomas Clark, minister of St Andrew's, Edinburgh, her father's old kirk;[15]
James Hunter Rutherfurd, Major in the Royal Engineers (1794-1866).
Publications
Address, delivered to the congregation of the High Church of Edinburgh, on Thursday the 9th of March 1797, ... by William Greenfield
Sermon, preached in the high-church of Edinburgh, before His Grace the Earl of Leven and Melville, His Majesty’s High Commissioner, on Thursday the 18th of May 1797, at the opening of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. / By William Greenfield
Dissertatio inauguralis, de methodis exhaustionum, atque rationum primarum et ultimarum: quam, ... ad gradum magistri in artibus liberalibus ... recitabit Gulielmus Greenfield, Edinburgh 1778, Balfour and Smellie
On the Use of Negative Quantities in the Solution of Problems by Algebraic Equations
Crawford, Robert, The Scottish Invention of English Literature, Cambridge University Press, 1998, ISBN0-521-59038-8[3]
Kaleidoscope, or Literary and Scientific Mirror Vol 1, page 32 [4] A similar comment was made by Andrew Lang in his Editor's Comments to an 1893 complete edition of the Waverley novels.;[17] as well as in Leigh Hunt'sExaminer[17]
.jpg)
