In Milton's case, friction with Chappell may have caused him to leave the college temporarily (a rustication) in 1626.[4] Another explanation is that plague caused an absence and that Milton's Elegy I have been over-interpreted.[5] He shared Chappell as a tutor with Edward King – his Lycidas – and it is thought that Damoetas in the poem refers to Chappell (or possibly Joseph Mede).[6][7]
On his return, Milton was taught by Nathaniel Tovey. Despite their problems, Milton may have learned from Chappell, who was a theoretician of preaching; this aspect of Milton is discussed in Jameela Lares, Milton and the Preaching Arts (2001). She suggests Andreas Hyperius, and his De formandis concionibus sacris (1553), as influential on Chappell and other writers on preaching and sermon types. Chappell was a pupil of William Ames, who left Christ's in 1610. Like Ames, he was a Ramist,[8] though he differed from the Calvinist Ames on doctrine. Chappell was an Arminian, with strong anti-predestinarian beliefs.[9] Lares argues for Chappell as the link to the older Christ's preaching tradition, Milton connected back to William Perkins.[10]
In any case, Chappell had a reputation then for strictness, and for being a hard man in a Latin disputation. Stories gathered about him: John Aubrey, an unreliable source, suggested Chappell had beaten Milton.[11][12] One of Chappell's disputation opponents was supposedly James I, crushed in Oxford;[13] another (William Roberts in 1615, later bishop of Bangor) allegedly had fainted.[14][15] The anonymous The Whole Duty of Man (1658) has been attributed to Chappell,[16] though modern opinion suggests Richard Allestree.
With Laud's fall, he was denounced by his fellows, and he was imprisoned in Dublin, in 1641, and later in Tenby, before being released. He then lived in retirement in Nottinghamshire. A monument to him was made in a church at Bilsthorpe.[22] Chappell died in London in 1649.
Works
Methodus Concionandi (1648)
Use of Scripture (1653)
The Preacher, or the Art and Method of Preaching (1656) translation of Methodus Concionandi
^Reynolds 2005, pp. 180–181. [...] some said 'they durst not come to hear Mr. Chappell because he preached Arminianisme'. [...] The point here, of course, is that Bridge and Stalham sought to define themselves as champions of the orthodox Protestant religion, against Chappell's emphasis on universal grace. [...] Certainly, reports of the elder Chappell's anti-predestinarian beliefs were in circulation in 1619, which seemingly commended him to Laud.
^Albert C. Labriola, Milton Studies (2004), p. 102.