Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-02-25/Technology report
I would like to see the p-value for the 1.8% figure. Josh Joaquin (talk) 07:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","author":"Josh Joaquin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z-Discuss_this_story","replies":["c-Steven_(WMF)-2013-03-04T20:29:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","c-Optimist_on_the_run-2013-02-28T10:51:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","c-Denny-2013-03-05T13:35:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z"]}}-->
- More details about the analysis, including p values, are at round 1 and round 2 pages. The 1.8% figure is in round 2, and was p < .001 to answer your question directly. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 20:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-04T20:29:00.000Z","author":"Steven (WMF)","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Steven_(WMF)-2013-03-04T20:29:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Steven Walling (WMF)"}}-->
- Is it possible to provide an explanation and/or link to what Wikidata phases 2 and 3 are? An optimist on the run! 10:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-02-28T10:51:00.000Z","author":"Optimist on the run","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Optimist_on_the_run-2013-02-28T10:51:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-^demon-2013-03-01T16:14:00.000Z-Optimist_on_the_run-2013-02-28T10:51:00.000Z"],"displayName":"optimist"}}-->
- I believe meta:Wikidata/Technical_proposal covers it pretty well. Is that helpful to you? ^demon[omg plz] 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-01T16:14:00.000Z","author":"^demon","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-^demon-2013-03-01T16:14:00.000Z-Optimist_on_the_run-2013-02-28T10:51:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"demon"}}-->
- I'd be grateful if you could point us to where the fears about the third phase being abandoned have been expressed so that we can join that conversation.
- I want to point out that deployment is - unsurprisingly, I guess - lagging behind development, and that we are quite far in developing phase 3 already. You can find code that is already prepared for a much deeper integration with Semantic MediaWiki than we originally had hoped. The code for much of phase 3 is here and here. As you can see, we are well beyond the design phase already - a first iteration of phase 3 is expected to be available pretty much as planned.
- It should always have been clear that the initial development of the first year can only be a first though already useful iteration. It is something that can be built upon and extended in the future both by the community, as well as us. --denny vrandečić (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-05T13:35:00.000Z","author":"Denny","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Denny-2013-03-05T13:35:00.000Z-Josh_Joaquin-2013-02-28T07:35:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"denny vrande\u010di\u0107"}}-->
|
|
← Back to Technology report