This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Royal corgis#Requested move 4 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240104130800","author":"Vanderwaalforces","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vanderwaalforces-20240104130800-Requested_move_at_Talk:Royal_corgis#Requested_move_4_January_2024","replies":[]}}-->

Template:Holywell Town F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. EdwardUK (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105035600","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240105035600-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Holywell_Town_F.C.","replies":[]}}-->

Guto Puw has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 07:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240108072300","author":"Spinixster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spinixster-20240108072300-Good_article_reassessment_for_Guto_Puw","replies":[]}}-->

Links to the "recent changes" watchlist for articles related to the wikiproject have been added to the sidebar and the Open tasks section of the project page. EdwardUK (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240109193700","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240109193700-Watchlist","replies":["c-DankJae-20240109202700-EdwardUK-20240109193700"]}}-->

Diolch! DankJae 20:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240109202700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240109202700-EdwardUK-20240109193700","replies":["c-DankJae-20240111200000-DankJae-20240109202700"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@EdwardUK, hi, just made Deputy Minister for Mental Health and Wellbeing, where do I add it? DankJae 20:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240111200000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240111200000-DankJae-20240109202700","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240111203900-DankJae-20240111200000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I divided the watchlist between four project subpages: Article List, Article Talk List, Other List and Other Talk List ("Other" covers things like categories and templates). The aim is to do full updates from time to time to deal with any changes, though new articles (or those newly tagged by the wikiproject) and their talk pages can be added to the relevant section of these lists. EdwardUK (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240111203900","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240111203900-DankJae-20240111200000","replies":["c-DankJae-20240111204600-EdwardUK-20240111203900"]}}-->

I assume you mean the Wales versions of those, will do. DankJae 20:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240111204600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240111204600-EdwardUK-20240111203900","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240111212400-DankJae-20240111204600"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Yes - must have cut/pasted the wrong links - have corrected them now EdwardUK (talk) 21:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240111212400","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240111212400-DankJae-20240111204600","replies":[]}}-->

Just a notice that I am slowly going through creating the missing Welsh Government cabinet posts. Just published five:

• Chief Whip (Wales)
• Minister for the Constitution (Wales)
• Minister for Rural Affairs (Wales)
• Minister for North Wales (used to be tagged onto "Minister for the Economy", so felt it should be separate from R.A.)
• Deputy Minister for Climate Change (merged "Minister for Transport" into this as multiple sources refer to the position as such and doubt a split off is needed).

I assume they're notable as their holders are presumed such per WP:NPOLITICIAN, and well wanted to accompany Minister for the Economy (Wales), Minister for Finance (Wales) and Minister for Local Government (Wales). If not notable, open to a list of Welsh Ministers article or something.

Just raising this because I do not know the history of these positions enough and there are a few gaps in the continuity of these posts as I struggled to find sources for exact dates of previous office-holders, so there are a few gaps on the older positions. Plus as not fully knowledgeable of government, I may have made a little mistake here and there, so any corrections would be welcomed.

Yes I am aware, the upcoming new first minister may reshuffle it all again, but I started this before the announcement was made. :/

Blwyddyn Newydd Dda. DankJae 17:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240102172000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240102172000-Missing_Welsh_Government_cabinet_posts","replies":["c-DankJae-20240120025000-DankJae-20240102172000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Done all of them, if I missed anything please check! DankJae 02:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240120025000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240120025000-DankJae-20240102172000","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Proposed further Welsh devolution and Proposed Welsh justice system require an update following recent events and debate which has been covered in the news.

Welsh independence also needs an update following recent news (the neutrality banner has been there for months and I'm not sure why either). Unionism in Wales could perhaps be updated in the same manner.

I've added some pointers to the talk pages of those first three pages.

Thanks Titus Gold (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240122031100","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20240122031100-Devolution_related_pages_need_an_update","replies":[]}}-->

Note this video stating that the claims the Welsh Dragon being linked to Cadwaladr were a mistake. It minimally mentions such link being present on Wikipedia, although critiques the sources’ sources instead. There may be edits based on this video on articles relating to the dragon, national flag, Cadwaladr, the Tudors and others. Just a heads up should edits based on this already be done or if an editor wishes to accept the video’s argument or actively reject it. DankJae 22:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231126223300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20231126223300-Cadwaladr_and_the_Welsh_Dragon","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20231127092400-DankJae-20231126223300","c-Deb-20240122184900-DankJae-20231126223300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

The Cadwaladr article was already fine. Information that contradicted Cadwaladr was added to Flag of Wales and Welsh Dragon sourced to an MA in Creative Writing that I had already taken issue with before. No prizes as to who added it, and perhaps why (do I detect some POV in the sidelining of Henry VII?) Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231127092400","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20231127092400-DankJae-20231126223300","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20240122035400-Sirfurboy-20231127092400"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I think the video is mostly fair but seems to make some wrong assumptions about what a source was pointing to. Even the video creator admits to the wrong use of Cadwaldr and the dragon and having done months of research to reach that conclusion. I'm glad it's been assessed. Multiple reliable sources acknowledged the connection between Henry VII and the Red Dragon of Cadwaladr, but no citing of the original source it seems. The MA source I think was just acknowledging the association that Henry VII made rather than Cadwaladr actually using it.

For such ancient history, I think it's wise to avoid any news articles! Thanks for addressing this. Titus Gold (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240122035400","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20240122035400-Sirfurboy-20231127092400","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20240122040200-Titus_Gold-20240122035400"]}}-->

Funnily enough, I recently realised the lack of evidence whilst editing the Welsh language equivalent. "Gwarchan Maelderw" (poem) seems to be one of the earlier mentions of a red dragon. Titus Gold (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240122040200","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20240122040200-Titus_Gold-20240122035400","replies":[]}}-->

Doesn't look like a reliable source to me. Deb (talk) 18:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240122184900","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240122184900-DankJae-20231126223300","replies":[]}}-->

Rhondda has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240131223300","author":"AirshipJungleman29","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AirshipJungleman29-20240131223300-Good_article_reassessment_for_Rhondda","replies":[],"displayName":"~~ AirshipJungleman29"}}-->

While the inner workings of other Wikipedias are not impactful on this Wikipedia, as each one operates separately. Just want to raise that after noticing excessive changes at Wikidata, such as removing "Bala Lake" for Llyn Tegid [1], seems one editor is mass-replacing derivatives of the currently used English names with the ("official", in a few cases) Welsh ones at various other (up to 32 ish) Wikipedias. Which depending on the Wikipedia may go against rules they may have in place, similar to what we have as WP:COMMONNAME here. Once again, while we shouldn't try and influence the consensus at other Wikipedias, considering the editor has had issues here, I could not overlook it and seems unlikely an active contributor in most of these 32 other language Wikis aside in place-names.

Nonetheless, just raising this should any discussions be started on English Wikipedia and an argument along the lines of

but other Wikipedias use the Welsh name

is used, which is obviously not enough alone regardless, but providing more context should it be used.

While sympathetic to using Welsh names, including that of Llyn Tegid (I have a personal project on it), one editor changing to Welsh place-names in 32 languages seems questionably good faith, let alone fluent or with local consensus. If any of you have connections to other (aside cy) Wikipedias to either take action, start discussions there, or recognise these edits are acceptable, then please do.

Apologies if this isn't the correct place, but have no idea where. DankJae 18:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231119182100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20231119182100-Mass_implementation_of_Welsh_place-names_on_other_Wikipedias","replies":["c-KJP1-20231119184900-DankJae-20231119182100","c-Sionk-20231119210400-DankJae-20231119182100"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Good to see TG honouring the spirit of their T-ban, and keeping their rampant POV in check. KJP1 (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231119184900","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20231119184900-DankJae-20231119182100","replies":[]}}-->

I expect it has something to do with the recent decision by the local national park to only use the Welsh language names of lakes in their juristiction. I don't have any knowledge of the rules that govern articles in other language Wikipedias - but unlike the English language Wikipedia, I doubt they need to have a preference for English language titles for their articles. Sionk (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231119210400","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sionk-20231119210400-DankJae-20231119182100","replies":["c-DankJae-20231119223400-Sionk-20231119210400"]}}-->

​So far, quickly checking es and fr, they seem to have something like commonname. de is a bit more complex stating "in the national language" from translation, but then goes to basically commonname if not the case. it states "official" names can be used if only there is no pre-existing italian version or italian use of the English one. Nonetheless, not saying every change is wrong, but doing it suddenly in 32 languages seems that such policies were not considered and was agenda-based. Some of them at fr, seem to be reverted, and was even banned from one wiki. Just raising it nonetheless.

Plus these changes are also impacting Wikidata, so corrections need to be there. Seem also not to be limited to lakes, with

Snowdonia → Eryri,

St Asaph → Llanelwy,[2] (so far not moved the articles yet)

Bull Bay → Porth Llechog,

Red Wharf Bay → Traeth Coch,[3]

Tanygrisiau Reservoir → Llyn Tanygrisiau, also spotted, with all the (former) names in English removed entirely, not even an alias[4], meaning such data items cannot even be found with the old name under search. May raise it at Wikidata? no idea tho. DankJae 22:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231119223400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20231119223400-Sionk-20231119210400","replies":["c-Sionk-20231120003400-DankJae-20231119223400"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

As KJP1 suggested, it doesn't bode well for any chance of having a Wikipedia topic ban reviewed, especially with the questionable name changes in Wikipedia article-space. Wikidata problems will have to be raised on Wikidata. Sionk (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231120003400","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sionk-20231120003400-DankJae-20231119223400","replies":["c-DankJae-20231120113900-Sionk-20231120003400"]}}-->

Already raised at Wikidata. DankJae 11:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231120113900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20231120113900-Sionk-20231120003400","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20231125211500-DankJae-20231120113900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Yes used Welsh names except for "British English" where I left as is. I agree official "British English" should be left as is on wikidata. Would prefer coming to me directly if I've made any mistakes so that I can immediately correct. Apologies Titus Gold (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231125211500","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20231125211500-DankJae-20231120113900","replies":["c-DankJae-20231126015200-Titus_Gold-20231125211500"]}}-->

Removing all the "English names" under "English" and all other languages seemed very intentional, leaving a newly added sole "British English" for the actual Common name. I explained my reasoning there on both the issue and why I chose the location of the discussion. DankJae 01:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231126015200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-DankJae-20231126015200-Titus_Gold-20231125211500","replies":["c-KJP1-20231126053800-DankJae-20231126015200"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Titus Gold - Your call for a direct dialogue would have more credibility, if you had attempted to discuss this major change before implementing it. But that would run counter to your modus operandi of seeking to get Facts on the ground in support of your view. What was the reason you didn't discuss this, here or on the other wikis, before implementing it? And do you think it is compliant with the spirit of your Welsh-topics T-Ban on en:Wiki? And what is the purpose of the change? KJP1 (talk) 05:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231126053800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-KJP1-20231126053800-DankJae-20231126015200","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20231126131400-KJP1-20231126053800"]}}-->

That's fair enough. It was intended to apply a consistent label pattern used for all non-"British English" labels as there didn't seem to be consistency or guidance for these labels. I also hadn't considered that common name policy might actually apply for non-British English or Welsh labels. In hindsight, I agree I should've discussed before implementing this on some pages. I will do this from now on wikidata in the same way that I've been doing in past few months in particular for Wikipedia. Hope that explains it. Titus Gold (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231126131400","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20231126131400-KJP1-20231126053800","replies":["c-KJP1-20231126132700-Titus_Gold-20231126131400"]}}-->

It doesn’t explain it at all. What you mean is: “Having got my own way, I’m content to promise collaboration in future”. But you’ve made, and broken, that promise many times. What would have some credibility, would be if you self-reverted your changes, and then came back here to discuss what you planned to do and why. Are you prepared to do that? KJP1 (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231126132700","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-KJP1-20231126132700-Titus_Gold-20231126131400","replies":["c-DankJae-20240201204900-KJP1-20231126132700"]}}-->

They're back at it again for Devil's Appendix on other Wikis, see Wikidata. DankJae 20:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201204900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-DankJae-20240201204900-KJP1-20231126132700","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240201211000-DankJae-20240201204900","c-KJP1-20240202002500-DankJae-20240201204900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Quelle surprise. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201211000","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240201211000-DankJae-20240201204900","replies":[]}}-->

Titus Gold - Personally, I think this needs to go back to ANI. The terms of the topic ban are:

"There is a near-unanimous consensus here to topic-ban Titus Gold from articles relating to Wales, broadly construed. A six-month wait before any appeal is recommended. There isn't a consensus for any additional topic bans or other restrictions at this time, but the community's patience is clearly wearing thin, and Titus Gold should be aware that problematic behavior in other areas will likely lead to further sanctions. (As written, the topic ban applies only in mainspace, but, again, disruption elsewhere will probably result in a swift expansion of the restriction" (my bold).

To me, this is a second clear breach of the spirit, if not the letter, of the ban. It's also a clear breach of their commitment given above: "I should've discussed before implementing this on some pages. I will do this from now on wikidata". In short they simply cannot be trusted not to continue to push their POV. I'll flag it shortly, unless anyone else wants to pick it up (please!). I've pinged TG so they are aware, although they watch this page. KJP1 (talk) 00:25, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202002500","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-KJP1-20240202002500-DankJae-20240201204900","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240202084600-KJP1-20240202002500"]}}-->

Topic bans are specific to English Wikipedia. Wasn't this a change to Wikidata only? If so, there is no breach of the topic ban and TG is perfectly entitled to make those edits. Having said that, the nature of the edits would be material in any appeal to the topic ban. It is exactly the type of POV editing that raised the concerns before. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202084600","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":13,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240202084600-KJP1-20240202002500","replies":["c-KJP1-20240202094800-Sirfurboy-20240202084600"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

Absolutely take the point, and I think your reading of the ban scope is entirely right. What I was wondering was whether the "problematic behaviour in other areas" clause would cover it. But quite happy to be told I'm wrong on that point. What is so frustrating, aside from the continued POV editing, is TG's bad faith. On 26/11/23 (above), they promised to discuss before implementing any more such changes. So where was the discussion before this latest change? KJP1 (talk) 09:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202094800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":14,"id":"c-KJP1-20240202094800-Sirfurboy-20240202084600","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240202100900-KJP1-20240202094800"]}}-->

To be honest, I am not sure what the process is for taking this up at Wikidata. Wouldn't it have to be raised with admins there? But I get the frustrations. TG has always been civil, but again and again the same things recur. There may be reasons for that. I know nothing about TG the person, and I am aware that there are reasons why past commitments can be forgotten without it necessarily demonstrating bad faith; but whatever the reasons, the effect is disruptive. TG needs to be aware that the community is repeatedly asking for more discussion, and if this is not forthcoming then referrals to whichever admin board is appropriate will follow. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202100900","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":15,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240202100900-KJP1-20240202094800","replies":["c-DankJae-20240202112700-Sirfurboy-20240202100900"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

This is technically not about Wikidata itself. Whenever you move a page on any Wiki including this one you also edit Wikidata. The edits at Wikidata are a result of their page moves on Norwegian Nynorsk and Cebuano Wikipedia. Which I don’t think they’re fluent in, nor considered what that language actually uses, and are only there to POV push Welsh names.

Not calling for anything specifically, nor do I think I can, just raising the issue again, as it seems that this issue isn’t solved, so expect them to do more, and appears that nothing has changed in their editing since the T-ban both on this Wiki (moved to other Celtic countries) and slowing spreading to other Wikipedias. DankJae 11:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202112700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":16,"id":"c-DankJae-20240202112700-Sirfurboy-20240202100900","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

OK, in the interests of starting the discussion suggested above; Titus Gold - could you:

• Briefly outline the place name changes you have been making on foreign-language Wikis and your intended rationale;
• Briefly outline the steps you've taken to understand the policy/guidance prevailing on those foreign-language wikis on place naming, e.g. their equivalent of Wikipedia:COMMONNAME;
• Briefly outline the steps you've taken, with diffs, to obtain consensus on the foreign-language wikis for the changes you've made;
• To help get a sense of scale, give details of:

(a) the number/names of the foreign-language wikis where you have made changes;

(b) the number of place name changes you have made on each foreign-language wiki.

• Undertake not to make further changes until this discussion is concluded.

Thank you. KJP1 (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202171200","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240202171200-Mass_implementation_of_Welsh_place-names_on_other_Wikipedias","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20240202173900-KJP1-20240202171200"]}}-->

As other users have stated, I was sure not to edit anything within the scope of the ban. As far as I can see, since the 20th November, Nant Clogwyn y Geifr is the only one I changed in other languages. (Also just created a handful of pages on the Welsh language Wici on small places that mostly didn't exist in other languages.) Some of reasons behind the two page moves was that there is no automatic preference for any English place names in Wales in any other language; the national park has announced it is moving to official names in the original Welsh only for waterfalls; common name doesn't seem to apply because I couldn't find any info on Nant Clogwyn y Geifr in those languages.

I thought bold moves were permitted on other language Wikis? So I'm now meant to start discussions before page moves? (Obviously I would know this is more often needed on English Wiki because there might Welgh lang/English lang contenders for any name changes)

What must I now do to have the topic ban lifted? Could I have very clear and defined criteria please (I think ambiguity on this may have been one of the contributors to the ban in the first place.)?

Thanks for your time. I'm happy to conform to any recommendations for now and future. Titus Gold (talk) 17:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202173900","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20240202173900-KJP1-20240202171200","replies":["c-KJP1-20240202193900-Titus_Gold-20240202173900"]}}-->

Titus Gold - can you give details of all changes, including those before 20/11/2023. KJP1 (talk) 19:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202193900","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240202193900-Titus_Gold-20240202173900","replies":["c-Titus_Gold-20240202205400-KJP1-20240202193900"]}}-->

After double-checking it's only those two moves for a place name (in a language other than Welsh) since November 2023.

(Since 2016, May 2020 I've counted (roughly 10 pages with roughly an average of 5 different language moves for the same page) so total of 50 page moved over that period.

Some of the reasoning I used in the past was:

• Other languages tend to always use whatever the English Wikipedia uses as a page name without even considering the Welsh name simply because it was what English wiki uses (and perhaps being completely unware of there being two names for some places in Wales)
• Welsh Wici is virtually never used for the template for name of places in other languages and I was concerned that this tendency of only using English placenames for Wales across all other language Wikis regardless of any other factors.
• Common name does not seem to apply to the virtually all of these names since there seems to be virtually no reference to these place names in other languages (exception mentioned below).
• Officially and legally in Wales, the Welsh name comes first, followed by the English name if there is one; so my thinking was that if a page was not in English, then perhaps it would be appropriate to default to Welsh more often if there was no common name factor.
• For some there was added reason that the Welsh name only was official, e.g some lakes in Eryri/Snowdonia.
• One name that I had perhaps had not considered properly for common name was Mont Snowdon in French. Consequently, this were reversed anyway and remain the reversed name (some were other reverts as well I think). Obviously France is geographically closer to Wales and and after some digging I found one or two articles using "Mont Snowdon"; so in hindsight, I had overlooked common name for that.

Titus Gold (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240202205400","author":"Titus Gold","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Titus_Gold-20240202205400-KJP1-20240202193900","replies":[]}}-->

A proposal to reverse an undiscussed split at Talk:List of Nuttall mountains in England and Wales#Merge proposal. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240205185700","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240205185700-Merge_proposal","replies":[],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

A discussion last year was about the renaming of Talk:Lôn Goed. Today I searched for Arthur's table, but realised it was actually listed as Bwrdd Arthur. Perhaps more Welsh named articles should be redirected into English? Starting with the Iron Age Arthur settlement on Anglesey, should we change Bwrdd to Table for the search engine? Cltjames (talk) 01:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207014200","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240207014200-Welsh_named_pages","replies":["c-DankJae-20240207034000-Cltjames-20240207014200"]}}-->

@Cltjames, if you believe it meets WP:RPURPOSE be free to make it, however IMO probably not, at least as a redirect (maybe a DAB). Although IMO, translations are a bit tougher to justify, especially in vaguer cases like making Big beach for Traeth Mawr. If Arthur's table is used by sources as an alternative name for Bwrdd Arthur then yes a redirect could be made, but if it isn't (incl. as just a translation) then it indicates the subject is more commonly referred to by its Welsh name. Plus there can be multiple translations, or the translation be very generic or vague possibly referring to other articles too, so in this case other tables? I believe such one could be confused for King Arthur's Round Table. If Bwrdd Arthur is commonly described as just "Arthur's table" in multiple sources and no other article is referred to that either, then it possibly be more justified, but this case probably not as a redirect, at least that's my initial opinion. DankJae 03:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207034000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240207034000-Cltjames-20240207014200","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240207044600-DankJae-20240207034000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Bwrdd Arthur seems like a good option for the article name as the alternatives each have minor variations: A Topographical Dictionary of Wales describes it as 'The fortress of Din Sylwy, otherwise called Bwrdd Arthur, or "Arthur's round table"', the RCAHMW list of historic place names records it a 'Bwrdd Arthur or Dinas Sylwy' and Smith, G., 2008 , Iron Age Settlements in Wales has 'Din Silwy has an alternative name of Bwrdd Arthur – (King) Arthur's Table'. EdwardUK (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207044600","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240207044600-DankJae-20240207034000","replies":["c-DankJae-20240207045300-EdwardUK-20240207044600"]}}-->

@EdwardUK? @Cltjames, is arguing whether Arthur's table should be made a redirect, the article is already called Bwrdd Arthur? DankJae 04:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Edit: "redirected" gave me the wrong impression. DankJae 04:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207045300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240207045300-EdwardUK-20240207044600","replies":["c-DankJae-20240207045500-DankJae-20240207045300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

On second thought, @Cltjames, by "redirected" do you mean "moving"? If so then no, per WP:USEENGLISH, Bwrdd Arthur is likely used more. DankJae 04:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207045500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240207045500-DankJae-20240207045300","replies":["c-Cltjames-20240207050900-DankJae-20240207045500"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Well, Din Silwy could work. Only I'm approaching the issue of Welsh placenames on the English Wikipedia here. Cltjames (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207050900","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240207050900-DankJae-20240207045500","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, there currently is a discussion and a dispute over whether District of Newport should be converted into about the Newport county borough (principal area) with Newport, Wales reduced to only the city. This discussion can be found at Talk:Newport, Wales#District of Newport. Thanks! DankJae 11:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207111800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240207111800-Newport:_City_vs_County_Borough","replies":["c-Crouch,_Swale-20240207170400-DankJae-20240207111800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@DankJae: It might be worth looking at if Swansea and Cardiff should also be split but unlike Newport both Swansea and Cardiff had boundary changes in 1996, see User:Crouch, Swale/Welsh districts, District of Swansea was merged with parts of Lliw Valley and District of Cardiff was merged with Pentyrch from Taff-Ely while Newport like Merthyr Tydfil had no changes[5] so should be dealt with in 1 article. In terms of Swansea the Welsh Wikipedia article is ta cy:Abertawe (sir) and the German one is at de:City and County of Swansea and with Cardiff the German Wikipedia article is at de:City and County of Cardiff. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207170400","author":"Crouch, Swale","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Crouch,_Swale-20240207170400-DankJae-20240207111800","replies":["c-DankJae-20240207174400-Crouch,_Swale-20240207170400"]}}-->

Nonetheless any splits of the long standing status quo have to be formally proposed, as any such change could vastly overhaul any such articles. Overall I am on the fence over such splits, I have found it odd, especially for Swansea where Gower is basically grouped as part of the city, however it may be hard to detangle the two, and they are styled as "City and County" together with their city status making the two more blurred, compared to Merthyr Tydfil where there is clearly still a "County Borough" represented, but can see an argument for a merge of Merthyr Tydfil and its county borough, but reluctantly.

But I do believe there is a stronger argument to actually merge those former district articles where there were minimal boundary changes with the main articles discussing the modern principal areas. But this ofc applies more to Newport and Cardiff, than Swansea. Pointing to a user page doesn't really say much, I did add the changes to Principal areas of Wales.

In terms of names it will be complicated "City and County of Swansea/Cardiff" can still give the impression it is also on the city, so the only contender may have to be "Swansea (county)" and "Cardiff (county)". Nonetheless any proposal should be discussed first as it will be a massive change, and not exactly convinced the worth of it, especially as England constantly shifts left and right when separate articles should or shouldn't exist, and plus more reasoning is needed than "because England" as referred to at Newport.

But once again, if it is formally and clearly proposed as a full split, a consensus for/against can appear. DankJae 17:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240207174400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240207174400-Crouch,_Swale-20240207170400","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I have nominated Edward I of England for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Jim Killock (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240220213000","author":"JimKillock","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JimKillock-20240220213000-FA_review:_Edward_I","replies":[],"displayName":"Jim Killock"}}-->

What is the purpose of this? Just asking, but best if some of the stuff there were merged or linked to from here? Not calling for mass redirecting, as links to the archives need to be maintained somehow. May be it merged/reconfigured with a WikiProject sub-page?

P.S. I may start some new local guideline (mainly geo-naming policy) discussions soon, I'll go slow, in case I overwhelm anyone. DankJae 01:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115013800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240115013800-Wikipedia:Welsh_Wikipedians'_notice_board","replies":["c-KJP1-20240115051800-DankJae-20240115013800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I’ve honestly no idea. I don’t think I knew it existed. I’d agree that it seems to duplicate the aim/objectives of this page. I see User:Deb was a contributor and they may have a better understanding than I as to its history/purpose. KJP1 (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115051800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240115051800-DankJae-20240115013800","replies":["c-Deb-20240115091100-KJP1-20240115051800"]}}-->

No objection. I think it may have existed before the WikiProject was created but I'm not going to spend hours checking. Deb (talk) 09:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115091100","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Deb-20240115091100-KJP1-20240115051800","replies":["c-KJP1-20240115093100-Deb-20240115091100"]}}-->

I think if it could remain accessible through a link, for historical purposes if nothing else, then it would be best merged. Though I see we've still not got an article on Plas Glyn y Weddw, which definitely warrants one. KJP1 (talk) 09:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115093100","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KJP1-20240115093100-Deb-20240115091100","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240115154300-KJP1-20240115093100"]}}-->

The noticeboard could be tagged as superseded (WP: HISPAGES) and the wikiproject marked as its successor. There is probably not much to merge as most of the content has not been updated for several years. The section on web-based resources may be a good addition to the wikiproject page (there is also something similar on the Awaken the Dragon page), but the links would need to be checked and updated. EdwardUK (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115154300","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240115154300-KJP1-20240115093100","replies":["c-DankJae-20240115230500-EdwardUK-20240115154300"]}}-->

Will try, slowly merge stuff, may move the out-dated stuff which wouldn't be helpful to merge, to an archival sub-page or something? DankJae 23:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115230500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-DankJae-20240115230500-EdwardUK-20240115154300","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Just seen someone use the old notice board's "Articles where your opinion is sought" section, should I move these under a Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Articles needing attention page? or just put on the main page? Essentially a manual Article Alerts? Or should it just be recommended anything be made a talk section here? Also Dydd Gŵyl Dewi Hapus DankJae 09:52, 1 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240301095200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240301095200-Wikipedia:Welsh_Wikipedians'_notice_board","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

There is a discussion at Talk:Brecon Beacons#Splitting back into range and national park that may be of interest to participants of this project. All opinions are valued, including any opposition or support to the proposed split. Diolch DankJae 11:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240307115200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240307115200-Brecon_Beacons_split","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

A discussion has been opened at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#County flags: discussion 1 concerning the UK county flags, which you are welcome to participate in. Thanks, A.D.Hope (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240310111900","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240310111900-UK_county_flags_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

I saw what @DankJae: was doing with the Welsh government roles, and after doing some work on articles related to some members of the executive board of the Wales Rugby Union#Principals, I saw there is a gap relating to the separate roles of the WRU, e.g. sporting directors, head of rugby etc, such as the role of Nigel Walker (athlete), or the work Ryan Jones until 2020. Any ideas on approaching a new article relating to the structure of Wales' rugby board? Cltjames (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240321002100","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240321002100-Wales_WRU_Executive_Board","replies":["c-Deb-20240321091600-Cltjames-20240321002100"]}}-->

I wouldn't know where to start, so I'll just ask a question - are these roles that might change their titles frequently over time, or are they very well-established? Deb (talk) 09:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240321091600","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240321091600-Cltjames-20240321002100","replies":["c-Cltjames-20240321140400-Deb-20240321091600"]}}-->

OK, you raised a good question. After doing some research it seems the positions have changed name slightly over the past decade or so, but now there is some stability in the Chairman, CEO, member of the Professional Rugby Board (PRB). Here are some links about appointments on the WRU website, WRU board and Executive board. Perhaps these pages explain the set up now, but @Deb: is right, for how long are the exact names of the roles allocated for...? But I think the Executive Board set up is well enough explained to elaborate in an article. Cltjames (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240321140400","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240321140400-Deb-20240321091600","replies":["c-Deb-20240321142400-Cltjames-20240321140400"]}}-->

I'd have no problem with that, though I'm unlikely to be able to be of much assistance. Deb (talk) 14:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240321142400","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Deb-20240321142400-Cltjames-20240321140400","replies":["c-Cltjames-20240321151800-Deb-20240321142400"]}}-->

After inspecting most of the other top tier playing rugby nations for comparison, it seems only Wales has a president list. Then, New Zealand Rugby and Rugby Australia are the only other articles that have included any mention of an executive list of board members. Rugby Australia has a potentially good article in creating a central hub for all rugby purposes, whilst New Zealand rugby have created a good Patron and Officers section with a table showing the personnel. Any ideas on what Wales' WRU could do better explain the corporate set up. I feel Welsh Rugby Union article is similar to the Australian and All Black articles I linked in showing the set up. But, there is a lot more that could be done for the Welsh article to better show the corporate structure for regions and women's game, as well as then the executive board set up, then also perhaps a table similar to the New Zealand article? Cltjames (talk) 15:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240321151800","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240321151800-Deb-20240321142400","replies":["c-DankJae-20240323124500-Cltjames-20240321151800"]}}-->

Probabaly best expanding/creating "governance" at the Welsh Rugby Union article (combining the principals list?), and if the tables or other things from the AU or NZ articles can improve it then be free to base an expansion on those articles as a guide, and better to try to see if it works. Not into rugby, but be free to raise it on the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union, unless someone into Welsh rugby also replies here. DankJae 12:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240323124500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-DankJae-20240323124500-Cltjames-20240321151800","replies":["c-Cltjames-20240326134600-DankJae-20240323124500"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Ok thanks, feel free to join the debate I started on the Project Rugby Union page. Cltjames (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240326134600","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240326134600-DankJae-20240323124500","replies":[]}}-->

Hi all, over the past month I have since created a svg map of every (I think) local government community in Wales listed under Commons Category:Locator maps of communities in Wales. With progress tracked at its talk.

I may slowly add them all to articles here (plus Wikidata), although help adding them would be appreciated, if anyone is interested. @Sionk:, sorry to duplicate some of your great maps, which I adopted its orange scheme.

I have created all maps from the 2010 Nilfanion's files, then manually updated those that (appear to) have changed since, with 2024 versions. If they have changed, "2010" and "2024" were added to the beginning of the file's names. I am confused if Torfaen and Vale had boundary changes?? They appear very minor.

The names for the communities in the 2010 files were derived from Nilfanion's 2010 files, and the 2024 names were the ones from Ordnance Survey, they may not automatically match the names of articles here, and hopefully have no typos. Although I removed full stops and apotrophes from "St. David's" etc, so "St Davids" (I think).

Please raise any mistakes/typos I have made. Diolch DankJae 15:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327153200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240327153200-Community_locator_maps","replies":["c-Sionk-20240327193600-DankJae-20240327153200"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Looks like a lot of work, you've made a rod for your own back :) Glad you followed through consistently with the orange (as opposed to the red for electoral wards) ...which I'm pretty sure I copied from some pre-existing maps when I created some new community locator maps following previous boundary changes. I'm unaware of a boundary review this year, so in my opinion it would have made more sense to name the files after the year of the boundary changes - there seems to have been a widespread review in 2016, for example. Quite a number of communities in Wales are very small and I expect they'll hardly be visible at the size of a map in a article infobox (particularly with Powys) - I'm not a fan of Nilfanion's base maps (there's a lot of wasted space on some of them) and cropped my versions as much as possible to maximise the visibility of the communities. But hey-ho, have fun. Sionk (talk) 19:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327193600","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sionk-20240327193600-DankJae-20240327153200","replies":["c-DankJae-20240327212800-Sionk-20240327193600"]}}-->

Only named them 2024 because they're up to date as of now, a few counties had multiple reviews since 2010 so would've had to make multiple versions, which is not as needed as many just need a up to date map first, and rarely see the reviews discussed for any needed intermediate maps. Understand any issues with Nilfanion's spacing, but only used those for consistency, style and ease, and still learning how to convert the OS data to map form. Yes Powys' are a bit large.

In the end, just want all of them to at least have a map, so focused on making them as quick and consistently as possible. Any new round of new versions will at least be much more slower, and smaller volume, allowing more time for any tweaks. Although I wish there were an easier and quicker way to batch upload to commons, as tbh that is where most of my time was spent.

Also I think I also saw green used for electoral wards? So seems to be a clash. Nonetheless, as per UKGEO, they're discussing whether wards are presumed notable themselves (discussion leaning to they aren't), so probably not worth the effort, in making every individual ward maps IMO for now (except Wrexham, because I already made them years ago :/), maybe county-wide ones, with labels and/or results. We'll see. DankJae 21:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327212800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240327212800-Sionk-20240327193600","replies":["c-Sionk-20240327223100-DankJae-20240327212800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Definitely communities are the priority, we can all agree on that. Sionk (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327223100","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sionk-20240327223100-DankJae-20240327212800","replies":["c-DankJae-20240410124500-Sionk-20240327223100"]}}-->

I am wondering how should I add them. Currently trying Anglesey, and for example at Holyhead added it in the second image parameter in the {{infobox UK place}}, but now it has basically two maps. Prefer a {{switcher}} between the two, displaying only one at a time, but that seems not workable. For many of these the "community" is as important so would prefer if it were in the infobox, but it seems I'll have to move it to the body of the article? Comments? DankJae 12:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410124500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240410124500-Sionk-20240327223100","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I've been doing a bit on the Monmouthshire article, taking the GA-assessed Pembrokeshire, Carmarthenshire, and Ceredigion as models. It still needs expansion (particularly the History/Geology) and a fair amount of polishing. But I'd be grateful for any thoughts on obvious gaps. Are there elements/features of the county that should be included, but currently aren't. I'd also be interested in any thoughts on the infobox image. Currently, it's got one, as have Pembrokeshire etc. But some of the English counties, e.g. Somerset, Gloucestershire, have rather nice multiple images. What would one choose, if trying to represent the county in 3-5 pictures? KJP1 (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412121800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240412121800-Monmouthshire","replies":["c-DankJae-20240412124700-KJP1-20240412121800"]}}-->

@KJP1 If you mean the main infobox image at Somerset etc, then I guess the discussion before, leading to WP:WLSCOUNTYCOLLAGE, applies, based on England's version. So usually 3 images. As done for Anglesey, Denbighshire and I did for Torfaen, and slowly doing the rest, leaving the GAs for last, aiming for a discussion for those. I did mention this at Talk:Monmouthshire, so happy to give my ideas, and encourage anyone else to give their's too.

In terms of the general article, will look if I notice anything missing or if I can help. DankJae 12:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412124700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240412124700-KJP1-20240412121800","replies":["c-KJP1-20240412125100-DankJae-20240412124700"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

DankJae - much appreciated. I'm pretty clueless as to the MoS on this, and on much else, so very happy to go with a convention of 3. So, how to sum up Monmouthshire in 3 shots? The usual internet searches give you Tintern Abbey, Chepstow Castle and Raglan Castle as the "top 3 attractions" but that'd give a very medieval-buildings focus to the IB! I'd be most grateful for any suggestions. And thanks for casting your eye over the wider article. Hope you're keeping well. KJP1 (talk) 12:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412125100","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240412125100-DankJae-20240412124700","replies":["c-DankJae-20240412143900-KJP1-20240412125100"]}}-->

It’s simply a project guideline, someone was adding 7 images on the northern counties, and there was once 15 added to Merseyside, which is clearly too many so called a discussion to set a number and most preferred similarity with England’s.

In terms of the actual images, in the end that’s fully subjective. You can be free to decide your own or prompt a discussion for a longer-standing selection.

When I decide them, I usually base them on four criteria, geographic representation, image quality/looks, defining feature of the county (is the county known for a World Heritage Site, for being coastal etc) and fitting in the infobox (usually requiring one vertical for it to fit). Some in England also use a cultural aspect for example a notable breed of animal. DankJae 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412143900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240412143900-KJP1-20240412125100","replies":["c-KJP1-20240412145000-DankJae-20240412143900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

That's very helpful. I have gone through many of the Monmouthshire pages running the "Good images" search, but there is so much mis-categorisation, it's easy to miss things. I think my personal preferences would be for one of Tintern, Chepstow or Raglan; then one panorama- probably from the Kymin, although I can't find any good ones; and you could as well argue for the Sugarloaf or the Skirrid - although they don't have any Good images either; and then something else. But what I'm not sure. KJP1 (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412145000","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-KJP1-20240412145000-DankJae-20240412143900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240412154600-KJP1-20240412145000"]}}-->

Yeah constantly scrolling through the most obscure commons categories (usually every community), then popping onto Flickr, Geograph and Google Images with Creative Commons, looking for them, is tiring.

Maybe try a mock up of them, sometimes I like a selection of places but when put together the images clash so sometimes still have to make adjustments. DankJae 15:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240412154600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-DankJae-20240412154600-KJP1-20240412145000","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:English_Maelor#Requested_move_1_April_2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Natg 19 (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240418230000","author":"Natg 19","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Natg_19-20240418230000-Requested_move_at_Talk:English_Maelor#Requested_move_1_April_2024","replies":[]}}-->

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Afon Tanat#Requested move 2 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. DankJae 21:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240419213400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240419213400-Requested_move_at_Talk:Afon_Tanat#Requested_move_2_April_2024","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

It appears that the Welsh Wikipedia articles on townships in Burlington County, New Jersey (but not cy:Burlington County, New Jersey itself) all show under Notable residents (Pobl nodedig) the same table of notable residents of the entire county. The repetition can be seen from the Commons listing of uses of the images, such as commons:File:Cardiak.jpg#File usage on other wikis. When I try to edit one of the township pages, such as cy:Florence Township, New Jersey, I can see that it's drawing the data from Wikidata, but I can't read Welsh, so I can't figure out whether the default display needs to be flipped from the county to the township, or even whether the list resides somewhere as a template transcluded onto the pages and would need to be edited there.

I know this does not in any way affect English Wikipedia, but I'm hoping some of those who have this page watchlisted are also active on cy.wiki, or would otherwise be willing and able to go over there and sort this out. Thanks in advance! Yngvadottir (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240501221200","author":"Yngvadottir","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yngvadottir-20240501221200-Can_anybody_here_sort_out_an_apparent_problem_on_cy.wiki?","replies":["c-Sionk-20240502122700-Yngvadottir-20240501221200","c-Sionk-20240502131400-Yngvadottir-20240501221200","c-Deb-20240502133200-Yngvadottir-20240501221200"]}}-->

It looks like all the Notable People are listed as born in Burlington County, so I would have thought the best place for the information would be on cy:Burlington County, New Jersey and not repeated on all township articles. I've no idea how the articles were generated, I expect cy.wici are using a clever bot way of generating content for the Welsh Wicipedia. I occasionally edit articles there, but don't create any from scratch. Sionk (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240502122700","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sionk-20240502122700-Yngvadottir-20240501221200","replies":[]}}-->

Maybe ask the question (in English) on the Talk page of Llywelyn2000, who seems to be managing the Bot (and heavily involved in cy.wici) - click on "Ychwanegu adran" to add a new section Sionk (talk) 13:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240502131400","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sionk-20240502131400-Yngvadottir-20240501221200","replies":[]}}-->

Oh yes, this is a problem I've had with other pages and have taken up with Llywelyn2000, but he didn't seem to agree that it was a problem. I'll have a quick look though. Deb (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240502133200","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240502133200-Yngvadottir-20240501221200","replies":["c-Deb-20240503081900-Deb-20240502133200"]}}-->

I've deleted that section from articles where none of the names are relevant or have cywiki articles, and only left a couple where I could find Welsh-language articles for people who really were from those townships. I'm prepared to do this elsewhere if you can flag up problems. Deb (talk) 08:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240503081900","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Deb-20240503081900-Deb-20240502133200","replies":[]}}-->

Gethin Jones has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 01:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240507015600","author":"Spinixster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Spinixster-20240507015600-Good_article_reassessment_for_Gethin_Jones","replies":[]}}-->

Hello,

I was wondering why there are no lists of communities by principal area of Wales, whereas there are lists of civil parishes for each of the counties of England. Is it just that no one took the time to create them?

I have tried to make one in my sandbox for Blaenau Gwent, since it is the principal area with the least number of communities, using the featured list List of civil parishes in Somerset as a rough guide. Do you think it looks fine? – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 12:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508125900","author":"\u00c6lfgar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900-Lists_of_communities","replies":["c-KJP1-20240508132800-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900","c-Rupples-20240508152100-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900","c-\u00c6lfgar-20240513121300-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900"]}}-->

Ælfgar - We do have this, List of communities in Wales but, as you say, it will just be that no-one has got round to doing a set of lists by Principal Area. Your draft looks rather good, I like the maps! It's quite a task to take on, with 878 to cover, but I'm sure it would be a useful addition to Welsh coverage. KJP1 (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508132800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240508132800-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240508133700-KJP1-20240508132800"]}}-->

Happy to help with this. DankJae 13:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508133700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240508133700-KJP1-20240508132800","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Try to 'proof' against notability concerns. While the lists can be viewed as navigational the only source in the sandbox article is NOMIS. What strikes me about the England articles is some (many? most?) have a copy/pasted narrative. 'Clever' because the multiple sources satisfy notability for each article, but at the same time questionable as to why we're repeating the same content across multiple articles. Witness the History and Current position sections of Civil parishes in Bedfordshire, Civil parishes in Berkshire, Civil parishes in Cheshire. Rupples (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508152100","author":"Rupples","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Rupples-20240508152100-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900","replies":["c-KJP1-20240508153800-Rupples-20240508152100"]}}-->

It's a good point. I'm not that hot on Notability debates but won't their legal status confer Notability under Wikipedia:NPLACE? I know some of the, rather surprisingly acrimonious, debate on the English ones arises from unparished areas, but Wales doesn't have any of those. As for "generic" material, I agree this could easily be found, e.g. here, [6]. Personally, I'd not be too bothered by a bit of repetition - we have it in the principal area series of Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales because it makes sense to explain the listing criteria at each instance. KJP1 (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508153800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240508153800-Rupples-20240508152100","replies":["c-KJP1-20240508154100-KJP1-20240508153800"]}}-->

P.s. - Although I was surprised to see that Baglan Bay appears to be an unpopulated community, i.e. without permanent residents? That sounds rather a contradiction in terms, and PLACE does say "populated", legally-recognised....KJP1 (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508154100","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KJP1-20240508154100-KJP1-20240508153800","replies":["c-Crouch,_Swale-20240508163400-KJP1-20240508154100"]}}-->

I expect we don't have separate lists for each principal area because when like List of civil parishes in Nottinghamshire they are simply lists (rather than expanded like the example in you're sandbox) because they can fit in a single list. However having expanded lists and splitting them does seem like a good idea. In terms of notability all communities in Wales have a form of local governance unlike pre 1974 urban parishes in England so will be notable. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508163400","author":"Crouch, Swale","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Crouch,_Swale-20240508163400-KJP1-20240508154100","replies":["c-DankJae-20240511120300-Crouch,_Swale-20240508163400"]}}-->

Yes, as the current list is just names, makes sense for all 800+ as one, but if we add in more details, then best split by principal area.

If there is duplication, especially if it is not really needed or unique to a county (like the history section) on the English ones, then possibly move those sections to civil parish. But a small consistent intro for context is probably fine. This sandbox seems to be fine.

If arguing notability, and that lists of presumed notable features aren't presumed notable themselves, then I would note all listed building lists would technically fall foul of that too, so a likely bigger discussion. DankJae 12:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240511120300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-DankJae-20240511120300-Crouch,_Swale-20240508163400","replies":["c-Rupples-20240511142600-DankJae-20240511120300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Yes, I've wondered about listed building lists and notability. All I'm suggesting is, it's preferable where possible to include sources independent of the listing authority. I mention this because as a contributor to AfD's I've noted those arguing for a list's deletion often cite WP:NLIST to support the claim a list is not notable, One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Other editors have challenged this interpretation but not always successfully. Rupples (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC) Applying this to list of communities, try and avoid reliance on a single source, unless confident the list can be seen as a navigational aid or index to Wikipedia articles. Rupples (talk) 14:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240511142600","author":"Rupples","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Rupples-20240511142600-DankJae-20240511120300","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the feedback. I have decided to be bold and launch the list onto the main space: List of communities in Blaenau Gwent. The 21 remaining lists should follow at some point, unless someone else wants to create some or all of them. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 12:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240513121300","author":"\u00c6lfgar","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-\u00c6lfgar-20240513121300-\u00c6lfgar-20240508125900","replies":[]}}-->

In relation to the discussion raised here at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales/Archive 2023#Discussion at ANI, a topic ban appeal on an editor's edits to pages relating to Wales has been raised. Their edits have been frequently discussed here.

The discussion is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Appeal to conclude topic ban. This may be of interest to participants of this project. DankJae 14:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240523142100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240523142100-Wales-related_editor_topic_ban_appeal","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Hi, just noticing that an @2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:859:8379:EBEB:EF99 anon is removing the IPA for English pronunciations? They argue there are potential American English pronounciations? I doubt Americans are even aware of many Welsh places, but if it is commonly used surely can be added or put into a note? Many articles have multiple pronunciations. They state because Welsh only has one pronunciation that, that, is the only one is needed as the rest of derivatives? So far they've done it to Gwynedd, Penrhyndeudraeth and Porthmadog. Although are there sources for any of these? These seem to be based on personal original research? ​ DankJae 23:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240104231100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240104231100-English-language_pronunciations","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240105045100-DankJae-20240104231100"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I suspect the motivation may be more to promote a particular viewpoint rather than to build the encyclopaedia without bias. It may be helpful for this wikiproject to have a recent changes watchlist as is used by WP:YORK to make it easier for users to monitor articles for potentially disruptive edits. EdwardUK (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105045100","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240105045100-DankJae-20240104231100","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240105082000-EdwardUK-20240105045100","c-DankJae-20240105140300-EdwardUK-20240105045100","c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201182000-EdwardUK-20240105045100"]}}-->

I wish that IP would use talk pages. However, I think they have some knowledge of linguistics and have a point. They did it first at Ceredigion and were repeatedly reverted in a slow burn edit war until I opened a talk section and we reached a consensus that they can go. See Talk:Ceredigion#Pronunciation, but the tl;dr is that these pages are about the place, and what a reader of a page about Gwynedd, Ceredigion, Porthmadog, etc. wants to know about is the place. Where the words are Welsh, naturally any reader might be interested in how to pronounce the word, but they are not interested, and certainly not in the very first sentence, to know how the word is mispronounced elsewhere.

And to get longwinded again (you can ignore this paragraph) IPA can very accurately represent a pronunciation, but pronunciations are coloured by dialect. Take /pɔːrθˈmædɒɡ/ for example, which is given as the English IPA of /pɔrθˈmadɔɡ/. Almost the same, and the differences come in the length of the o and a slight closed shift of the a from fully open. Except the English IPA guide does not offer the fully open a, except in the notes, where it suggests that, per the OED, the /a/ more closely reflects RP. So /a/ is not used because the writer of the IPA English page decided not to follow RP but another variant of English. American English perhaps? And then, what of that r? It is meant as an approximant in the IPA English guide, yet the guide admits this means it is really IPA /ɹ/. What is rendered is the IPA symbol for an alveolar trill, /r/, which is heard in a few English varieties but is definitely unusual in English. So that English rendering is, in any case, problematic. It doesn't belong there. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105082000","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240105082000-EdwardUK-20240105045100","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240105085500-Sirfurboy-20240105082000"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I'll just add a caveat to my comments. In some places an alternative pronunciation is so common that it may not be enough to list just the standard Welsh pronunciation. Aberystwyth is a case in point (but currently only has one pronunciation listed). These would need to be considered case by case. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105085500","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240105085500-Sirfurboy-20240105082000","replies":["c-DankJae-20240105132800-Sirfurboy-20240105085500"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

@FutureFlowsLoveYou, just did the first reversion of such at Powys, citing MOS:DUALPRON. So what to do about the others removed? DankJae 13:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105132800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240105132800-Sirfurboy-20240105085500","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240105135300-DankJae-20240105132800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I don't think there is an established alternative English pronunciation for Gwynedd and Penrhyndeudraeth. I personally would leave those alone. Porthmadog has an English alternative, not used much anymore, of Portmadoc. This is in the article, and could, presumably, be rendered in IPA too (although I don't really see the benefit to the reader of doing so). I would agree with the reversion on Powys, as there are two pronunciations there (although now it lists 3. We could pare back one). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105135300","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240105135300-DankJae-20240105132800","replies":[],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

@EdwardUK, That would be great although how do you set one up, looking at Yorkshire's I assume it is a manual watchlist of every related article and then funnelled through the related changes system? DankJae 14:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105140300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240105140300-EdwardUK-20240105045100","replies":["c-EdwardUK-20240105151100-DankJae-20240105140300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@DankJae: That is basically how it works. The lists are put together from all the pages tagged with the wikiproject template. Although, it would need updating occasionally to add any new articles to the list. I made one for Rugby league about a month ago based on their article assessment page and it seems to be working, once I had worked out a method it only took an hour or two to create it. I am usually busy over weekends but I should be able to put together one for Wales next week. EdwardUK (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105151100","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240105151100-DankJae-20240105140300","replies":["c-DankJae-20240107163100-EdwardUK-20240105151100"]}}-->

That would be great if you could! DankJae 16:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240107163100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240107163100-EdwardUK-20240105151100","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

That's a disappointing assumption, for my reasoning has been clear. I'm not sure what 'particular viewpoint' you think I have in mind. Also, some other assumption made about my edits I have disproven below, such as the matter of the breve when transcribing dipthongs (which is backed up by the already-existing article on dipthongs.

Some of the contributions in this topic section display bad faith, I'm afraid. I feel that some of those who have contributed subscribe to the unfortunate assumption that to edit in a way that gives the Welsh langauge prominence in situations where it is merely logical is a 'Nationalist'.

Anyway, I do accept, with thanks, that the vast majority are doing what they feel is right, but the tone here suggests that I am probably wasting my time. You shall all feel very relieved then when I tell you that I am done. 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694 (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201182000","author":"2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201182000-EdwardUK-20240105045100","replies":[]}}-->

I have questioned the IP on their Talk page but have had no response. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105133300","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240105133300-English-language_pronunciations","replies":["c-DankJae-20240105140100-Martinevans123-20240105133300"]}}-->

Still as an IP, their address may constantly change, in the period of this discussion it already has (but clearly the same person), so possibly they would edit under another ip address and not see the question? This does make monitoring their changes a bit more difficult unless someone has every county and place on their watchlist. DankJae 14:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105140100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240105140100-Martinevans123-20240105133300","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240105140700-DankJae-20240105140100"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Yes, of course. Just being optimistic! It geolocates to BT in London, likely static. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105140700","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240105140700-DankJae-20240105140100","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240105154400-Martinevans123-20240105140700"]}}-->

The address is an IPv6 one. In an IPv6 address the bottom 64 bits are not static as they are used for autoconfiguration. If the user has just a single /64 (the smallest range available in IPv6), then they are all addresses under 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01::/64. That is, that part of the number doesn't change, but the other part will - perhaps every time they switch off their device. That gives them a range of about 1.8x10^19 different addresses. If the user took one stride in the same direction for each of those addresses, they would run out of numbers when they reach the M25... not the one in London... the one in Sagittarius. Here are all their contributions to date: Special:Contributions/2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01::/64 Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105154400","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240105154400-Martinevans123-20240105140700","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240105155300-Sirfurboy-20240105154400"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

Ah right, so we can expect to see Welsh IPA changes for place names in Sagittarius before long! Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240105155300","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240105155300-Sirfurboy-20240105154400","replies":["c-DankJae-20240107163800-Martinevans123-20240105155300"]}}-->

Oh it's being going on for a while, but based on some of their edit summaries seems their argument is just "Welsh pronunciation is the only correct one". Anyone into IPAs willing to look into them? What is the IPA policy anyway, seems a bit OR. DankJae 16:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240107163800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-DankJae-20240107163800-Martinevans123-20240105155300","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240107181200-DankJae-20240107163800","c-Martinevans123-20240107182200-DankJae-20240107163800","c-EdwardUK-20240108044500-DankJae-20240107163800","c-Deb-20240201160200-DankJae-20240107163800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I have been watching the user's edits. I have neither strong motivation either to assist or to revert. I would be reverting if they were blatantly wrong. There is a bit of disagreement over whether IPAs need references. IPA is phonetic spelling, and when there is a single unequivocal pronunciation of a Welsh word, spelling that word in IPA should not need a reference. Edits at Penparcau demonstrate a problem though. Very often there is not a single pronunciation. I reverted one of the IP's edits but left their reformulation. There is a message on my talk page about it too. The IPA there now is correct standard Welsh, and does not, in my opinion, need a citation. However Penparcau is in mid Wales, and there is a mid Wales pronunciation of the word that differs in the end vowel. The inhabitants of Penparcau, meanwhile, pronounce it with yet another end sound that is not properly Welsh. I suppose we could cite the variations and then spell them. It is another example of MOS:DUALPRON. But my reason for not going in and making a bunch of changes is that - MOS or not - pages are meant to give knowledge to readers, and long discussions of various pronunciations do not belong in the first sentence of a lead of an article that is about a town. The article is not about dialect continua. Fingers crossed the IP doesn't do this all the way to Sagittarius (I am pretty sure the dialect beyond this star system is fairly unrecognisable - although I don't have a source for that). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240107181200","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240107181200-DankJae-20240107163800","replies":[],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I must admit I have had exactly the same reaction. But the big question - shouldn't en.wiki have English IPA guides, at least more prominently than Welsh IPA guides (which really belong at cy.wiki)? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC) Sagittarius Love Languages: An Expert-Backed Guide - all you need to know!__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240107182200","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240107182200-DankJae-20240107163800","replies":[]}}-->

The guideline for appropriate use is for inclusion when it would not be obvious from the spelling, in which case a source to verify the non-obvious could be reasonably expected, and if it is unambiguous then the pronunciation is not necessary. Should this apply equally whether the pronunciation is in Welsh or English then based on the edit summaries it could have been the Welsh that they removed. If in Gwynedd 65% of residents speak Welsh then a third do not, and the majority of these probably use English as would the national/local authorities and media when communicating with these non-Welsh speaking residents. This seems a reasonable proportion of the population for the articles to include an English IPA where appropriate. Those used for the administration within the area could be considered as the standard English and Welsh pronunciations, and if these are the same in both languages then why not mention this too. I am not convinced by the edit summary that a British-English pronunciation should be excluded because people on the other side of the Atlantic, few of whom may have ever heard of the place in question, may use an dialect that causes it to sound different, but if the IP has sources for multiple other English-language variations (or maybe even Patagonian Welsh alternatives?) then rather than removing content these could be added and placed in a footnote as in the examples in MOS:PRONPLACEMENT. EdwardUK (talk) 04:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240108044500","author":"EdwardUK","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-EdwardUK-20240108044500-DankJae-20240107163800","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240108082500-EdwardUK-20240108044500"]}}-->

The guideline for appropriate use is for inclusion when it would not be obvious from the spelling, in which case a source to verify the non-obvious could be reasonably expected. This is the case for non obvious pronunciations of English language placenames, certainly. Worcester, England for instance. I note that even there, editors have not felt it necessary to cite the IPA. But for Welsh placenames the situation is different. Welsh has phonetic spelling, so anyone understanding the rules of the Welsh spelling system can read (almost) any Welsh word correctly first time. Nevertheless the rules of the phonetic spelling system are not widely known by readers who speak English but not Welsh. Moreover it is very common that readers of Welsh place names do want to know how the place is pronounced. Thus it is good information in an article to provide the reader with the pronunciation, either by giving them the Welsh rules of pronunciation (which you see a lot in books), or, as Wikipedia and dictionaries do it, using IPA. If using IPA, this falls squarely into WP:BLUESKY. The IPA template itself links to the pronunciation guide, so that is not required, and the only other reference that would make any sense would be something like "Teach yourself Welsh" and that is unecessary. We don't reference spellings. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240108082500","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240108082500-EdwardUK-20240108044500","replies":[],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I have to say I tend to agree that there is only one correct pronunciation for most Welsh names. Deb (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201160200","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Deb-20240201160200-DankJae-20240107163800","replies":[]}}-->

Seems they've tried to remove Anglesey's IPA entirely. Still not convinced by their edits. If the argument is that Welsh is already phonetic, tbh that actually means there is less reason for the Welsh IPA if those more familiar with the language, do not even need it. But I'd say verified English IPAs should stay, rather than based on personal use as in the end, I don't think there is a IPA exception to WP:V? (unless there is?). DankJae 20:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240109203100","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240109203100-English-language_pronunciations","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240109210400-DankJae-20240109203100"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

They were rightly reverted on Anglesey. I think the way Wikipedia presents IPA may be leading to a misunderstanding. Apologies if I am wrong on that I am about to state the obvious. But for the avoidance of doubt, there is no Welsh IPA that is different from English IPA. There is simply IPA. It is a phonetic alphabet, and given a particular pronunciation of a word, there should only be one way to correctly describe it in IPA.

The Welsh pronunciation guide that links from Welsh IPA spellings merely points to the specific IPA sounds that are found in Welsh. The English pronunciation guide, however, is misleading because there is a greater dialect continuum and the guide can mislead the reader as to what sound is represented by a letter (/r/ being a case in point). Ideally you would simply link to an IPA guide (such as: International Phonetic Alphabet#/media/File:IPA chart 2020.svg ). But we don't want to bog down readers with all that information, so these pronunciation guides have developed to simplify things. The English guide simplifies at the expense of accuracy. But again, there is a single IPA. Given a word with a single standard Welsh pronunciation, and no English alternative (e.g. Aberdyfi, which has an English spelling but the same pronunciation) then we should put the IPA in to tell a reader how to pronounce it. One IPA, for the one correct pronunciation. And I say that knowing full well that the Aberdyfi article doesn't do that. For some reason we have an unsourced and very subtly incorrect "English" IPA, partly because the English pronunciation guide favours a particular flavour of English that is not RP and partly because someone has mistaken an open mid back vowel for the schwa, or else, for that syllable, has favoured RP over other flavours of English![7] Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240109210400","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240109210400-DankJae-20240109203100","replies":["c-DankJae-20240109221700-Sirfurboy-20240109210400"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

Still uncomfortable with the idea "one correct pronunciation", what if locals have a local pronunciation that diverges from Welsh phonology. I know Rhos and Clwyd (Welsh-derived words) are pronounced differently depending where in Wales you are, so still concerned with this "Welsh alphabet" first standard, although, overall, yes few have sources either. Still don't like the idea how local pronunciations in English and Welsh may be mass-removed for the "only correct way". Like yes you mention a "single standard Welsh pronunciation" but if that existed then why are these edits happening suddenly and widely? Surely the standard should've already been there, but there was another one added by someone else.

Once again, the editor in question isn't using the argument "no English alternative", but "it is not needed". I am not really questioning their edits to the Welsh IPA tbh, but the removal of others and with no citations to confirm the new or the old was correct.

Finally there is the assumption English-speakers in Wales pronounce the Welsh names correctly, and while they likely do, the uncited and wide-ranging edits do not make me trust it. May be if possible instead of changing the existing IPA, but a theoretically standard one (in line with the Welsh alphabet) is added before it? DankJae 22:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240109221700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240109221700-Sirfurboy-20240109210400","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240115155900-DankJae-20240109221700","c-Deb-20240201184300-DankJae-20240109221700"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Indeed there are many varieties of Welsh English, such as Cardiff English, etc., where standard English or standard Welsh pronunciations do not apply. But I guess there might be many non-English speakers who come here to see how to pronounce Welsh place names in English? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115155900","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240115155900-DankJae-20240109221700","replies":["c-DankJae-20240116141400-Martinevans123-20240115155900"]}}-->

Plus I keep seeing the IP add "u̯" which isn't even in Help:IPA/Welsh, so there goes accuracy. DankJae 14:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240116141400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240116141400-Martinevans123-20240115155900","replies":["c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201002100-DankJae-20240116141400"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Hello, the purpose of the mark such as that in "au̯" is to show that the vowels are not sounded separately (as two syllables) but rather form a single unit (a diphthong, which is also a single syllable). Really, the Welsh IPA page should note this. Look at the IPA guide pages for other languages which also have similar dipthongs, sucH as Finnish, and you will see the same mark. 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008 (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201002100","author":"2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201002100-DankJae-20240116141400","replies":["c-DankJae-20240201013900-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201002100"]}}-->

Best discuss there whether to add it there, before adding contradictory IPAs, in the end this is about Welsh not Finnish.​​​ DankJae 01:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201013900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-DankJae-20240201013900-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201002100","replies":["c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200-DankJae-20240201013900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I am not suggesting that Welsh follows the IPA for Finnish or indeed any other language, but rather that this is the convention when transcribing dipthongs (including for Welsh). I will look for sourceable material to show this in any case, as I understand that to those not acquainted with IPA, it might look like I am following my own instinct (which I assure that I am not). Best wishes 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008 (talk) 08:52, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201085200","author":"2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200-DankJae-20240201013900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240201135600-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200","c-Martinevans123-20240201141100-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200"]}}-->

Just saying best raise a discussion at Help talk:IPA/Welsh to add that symbol before putting it into articles. Readers now see that symbol but aren't explained what it means on the IPA page, so confusing. DankJae 13:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201135600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-DankJae-20240201135600-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200","replies":["c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201174700-DankJae-20240201135600"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Thank you, I shall do that.

You will also see that in the article on dipthongs the following sentence:

"The non-syllabic diacritic, the inverted breve below ⟨◌̯⟩, is placed under the less prominent part of a diphthong to show that it is part of a diphthong rather than a vowel in a separate syllable: [aɪ̯ aʊ̯]".

I hope that you will now see that I am indeed following a recognised convention for IPA transcription. 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694 (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201174700","author":"2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201174700-DankJae-20240201135600","replies":[]}}-->

Hello 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008. Are you in any way related to 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01::/64? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201141100","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240201141100-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:59DC:F6CC:E84C:1008-20240201085200","replies":["c-DankJae-20240201144000-Martinevans123-20240201141100","c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201181100-Martinevans123-20240201141100"]}}-->

@Martinevans123, while their edits are not appearing under that IP range, both as under the same partial block, and both involved with Penparcau. DankJae 14:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201144000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-DankJae-20240201144000-Martinevans123-20240201141100","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240201144400-DankJae-20240201144000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Quelle surprise. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201144400","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240201144400-DankJae-20240201144000","replies":[]}}-->

There's nothing I can click and see there sorry, so I can't tell you. 2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694 (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201181100","author":"2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201181100-Martinevans123-20240201141100","replies":["c-Martinevans123-20240201185600-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201181100"]}}-->

Try 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:181B:4B17:AC6F:6D12, for example? Thanks Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201185600","author":"Martinevans123","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-Martinevans123-20240201185600-2A00:23C7:7C81:9001:79E4:CC96:47BF:D694-20240201181100","replies":[]}}-->

What you're talking about, I think, is dialect. For example, round this area, it's common for names with "oes" at the end of them, e.g. "Treoes", "Tan-y-Groes", to be pronounced as if they were English, with a long "o", but I'm not sure that being mispronounced by Welsh people makes it okay. Deb (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240201184300","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Deb-20240201184300-DankJae-20240109221700","replies":[]}}-->

There is a discussion at Talk:Ceredigion#Pronunciation 2 concerning an English pronunciation. DankJae 08:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240421082200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240421082200-English-language_pronunciations","replies":["c-DankJae-20240507104900-DankJae-20240421082200"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

There is now a discussion at Talk:Llandudno#English IPA concerning its pronunciation. I have a feeling that this issue isn't going away and that we now may have to consider banning English pronunciations on Welsh names if they're continuously being in dispute. DankJae 10:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240507104900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240507104900-DankJae-20240421082200","replies":["c-DankJae-20240507105500-DankJae-20240507104900","c-Llabbillob-20240507110900-DankJae-20240507104900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Also Talk:Merthyr Tydfil#Pronunciation. DankJae 10:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240507105500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240507105500-DankJae-20240507104900","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I don't think that anybody is calling for the abolition of the English pronunciations necessarily, but rather a consistent approach? They're all over the place at the moment. For example, as stated there, the IPA for 'Merthyr' currently states that is pronounced rhotically, i.e. that the 'r' is prounounced in both instances. This is clearly not the case., regardless of the citation.

Having read the above discussion(s), it seems that the logic of including an English pronunciation is that it at least gives something for those not conversant in Welsh to work with. That is fair enough, I think, but when the IPA given is then inconsistent or indeed simply misleading - to what avail? Another question is which pronunciation is favoured when there are many English pronunciations in circulation? The Welsh obviously avoids this as there is much less variation in the standard pronunciation, with it being a phonemic orthography. The exception maybe is the difference between [ɨ] and [iː] in the North and South, i.e. such as in 'canu'. A trifling point compared with the inconsistency in the English pronunciations.

I'm not saying that I have an answer, though. It is a thorny issue that seems to lead right back to the start ad infinitum! Llabbillob (talk) 11:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240507110900","author":"Llabbillob","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Llabbillob-20240507110900-DankJae-20240507104900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240507113000-Llabbillob-20240507110900"]}}-->

The reason why I started this discussion was because someone was removing all English-language pronunciations. Arguing "the English one is misleading/inaccurate/numerous/uncited" compared to (original/correct) phonetic Welsh, some argue the Welsh one is the only one needed.

I only follow what citations give us, especially if the pronunciation has been disputed, because a lot of pronunciations are OR. I only added Merthyr's because this issue led to the previous IPA being removed entirely. So reinserted using sources.

We can include multiple pronunciations, although for Merthyr only found two. If they're too many, they can be put into a footnote, or generalised into one variety based on Wikipedia's IPA guides (although leading to it differing from sources, subject to dispute). DankJae 11:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240507113000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240507113000-Llabbillob-20240507110900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240525180600-DankJae-20240507113000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

There are now two accounts created today removing English pronunciations, unless there is an agreement here, there seems there will be a backdoor ban on English language pronunciations on places in Wales, particularly those with Welsh names. New account 1 and new account 2 (although mainly Welsh names overall).

Just a bit surprised how all of a sudden there is a collective campaign against English-language pronunciations. Seems everyone is tired of disputing, so easier to propose a guideline against English-language pronunciations? DankJae 18:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240525180600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240525180600-DankJae-20240507113000","replies":["c-Sionk-20240525200200-DankJae-20240525180600"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I'm not an expert in the intricacies of IPA markup, but the latest edits seem to be happening on names of places in the Welsh speaking heartlands, where there is likely to be a common pronounciation regardless of your mother tongue. However, there are clear differences in several places, particularly in the areas of Wales where Welsh speakers are less common, where the common pronounciation does not follow Welsh phonetics and has been 'anglicised' in some way. I can think of places like Llanedeyrn, Caerau, Magor and Slebech off the top of my head. The English language Wikipedia shouldn't be a place to enforce Welsh language phonetics only ...if that is what the IPs are trying to do. Sionk (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240525200200","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Sionk-20240525200200-DankJae-20240525180600","replies":["c-DankJae-20240525220700-Sionk-20240525200200"]}}-->

Well this discussion, as well as at Ceredigion, led to no consensus or supporting the status quo of removing the English pronunciation.

The initial other IP which sparked this discussion edited outside the Welsh-speaking heartlands, so not always limited to them.

I agree that more eastern parts diverge, which is why I express concern on the Welsh pronunciation only approach, even if its likely the most accurate and used, as there are variations on Rhos for example. However with English-language pronunciations slowly being removed, and with no guideline for/against them, and that many lack citations in the first place, not sure if they should all be restored or removed. Nonetheless, seems that if nothing is agreed, slowly IPs would remove them all. DankJae 22:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240525220700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-DankJae-20240525220700-Sionk-20240525200200","replies":["c-DankJae-20240527214900-DankJae-20240525220700"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

another IP removal of the English pronuncation, any pronunciation other than the Welsh one is simply incorrect. DankJae 21:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240527214900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-DankJae-20240527214900-DankJae-20240525220700","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Hello! There is an RFC at the reliable sources noticeboard regarding a subject relevant to this Wikiproject. BilledMammal (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610064400","author":"BilledMammal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BilledMammal-20240610064400-RFC_at_RSN:_The_Telegraph_on_trans_issues","replies":["c-Deb-20240610082300-BilledMammal-20240610064400"]}}-->

Are you sure you have the right project? I'm not sure why this should be of specific relevance to Wales. Deb (talk) 08:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610082300","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240610082300-BilledMammal-20240610064400","replies":[]}}-->

I've opened a new discussion at WikiProject:UK geography about sub-national UK flags, including historic county and principal area flags. Anyone is welcome to participate. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610100900","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240610100900-UK_sub-national_geographic_flags_discussion","replies":[]}}-->

There's an irritating gap here, Registered historic parks and gardens in Cardiff, where there should be an image of the gardens/grounds of Coryton House. I can find nothing suitable in Commons, or at Geograph. Google suggests that the site, now Tŷ Coryton special school, is virtually surrounded by development - superstore/hotel to the N, residential to the E - but with the trainline, the canal and a nature reserve to the S. It also looks well-wooded. I've no idea if a photograph from public land/the highway is possible. If any Cardiff-based editor has the time/inclination to find out, I'd be very grateful. KJP1 (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240331075200","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240331075200-T\u0177_Coryton","replies":["c-Deb-20240610082100-KJP1-20240331075200"]}}-->

@KJP1 I imagine you've already looked here and decided it's not suitable? I don't even know for sure that these are in the gardens of the house, but you could maybe contact the copyright holder. Deb (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610082100","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240610082100-KJP1-20240331075200","replies":["c-KJP1-20240610121800-Deb-20240610082100"]}}-->

@Deb - Thank you very much. I'd not actually thought to look there. And the orchids are very pretty! I may well see about contacting the holder. Oddly, neither Coflein nor Cadw hold any images either. Cadw is less surprising, but RCAHMW has a very extensive image archive so that is more so. If all else fails, I shall force my aged, Welsh-resident, mother to get her Box Brownie out. Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 12:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610121800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240610121800-Deb-20240610082100","replies":[]}}-->

cc:Mac Edmunds - If any AfC reviewers have the time and inclination, there is an interesting draft, here Draft:John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, which needs a review. Thanks in anticipation. KJP1 (talk) 12:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610121400","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240610121400-The_last_of_the_Morgans","replies":["c-KJP1-20240617135600-KJP1-20240610121400"]}}-->

Now passed. KJP1 (talk) 13:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240617135600","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240617135600-KJP1-20240610121400","replies":[]}}-->

Hello everyone,

If any AfC reviewers have any spare time, I have a draft on Draft:Princess Olga Dolgorouky, wife of Evan Morgan, 2nd Viscount Tredegar, and would be grateful if anyone would review it.

TIA

Mac Edmunds (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240617200400","author":"Mac Edmunds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mac_Edmunds-20240617200400-Princess_Olga_Dolgorouky","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Everyone, If any reviewers have the time or inclination, my article, John Morgan, 6th Baron Tredegar, needs reviewing in terms of Welsh importance. Morgan was responsible for the end of the Lords Tredegars, and the liquidation of the entire 53,000 acre Tredegar estate which once catered for 1000 tenanted farms. I would be grateful if anyone could review it, and would be interested to hear opinions regarding his importance in Welsh History. TIA, Mac Edmunds (talk) 07:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240724073500","author":"Mac Edmunds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mac_Edmunds-20240724073500-John_Morgan,_6th_Baron_Tredegar","replies":["c-KJP1-20240724090300-Mac_Edmunds-20240724073500"]}}-->

Replied on article Talkpage, and slightly compressed your original post! KJP1 (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240724090300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240724090300-Mac_Edmunds-20240724073500","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Everyone,

I have recently published the article, Sir John Dillwyn-Venables-Llewelyn, 4th Baronet.

If anyone has the time or inclination, it needs to be reviewed in terms of “content assessment” and “Welsh importance”.

Sir John is a Welsh racing driver, who has connections to fellow Welshman, Fitzroy Somerset, 5th Lord Raglan. He was named one of the most important people in Swansea and is the owner of several Welsh companies and farms.

I would be grateful if anyone could review the article, and interested to see your thoughts!

TIA,

Mac Edmunds (talk) 11:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240726115700","author":"Mac Edmunds","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mac_Edmunds-20240726115700-Sir_John_Venables-Llewelyn","replies":[]}}-->

A4232 road has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240728211100","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20240728211100-Good_article_reassessment_for_A4232_road","replies":[]}}-->

I've suggested a merge for Crow Rock as it doesn't seem to have any friends and I don't know where it could go. Community? Bristol Channel? Pembrokeshire Coast? It's all part of trying to reduce or fix all the remaining few Pembrokeshire stubs. We're getting there. Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240803163000","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240803163000-Crow_Rock","replies":[]}}-->

This building in Flintshire is called "Llettau at Pentrehobyn". Is "Llettau" just a name, like "Dunroamin", or does it have a meaning? It sounds something like an almshouse. I can't find it in on-line Welsh dictionaries. KJP1 (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240818055300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240818055300-Meaning_of_\"llettau\"","replies":["c-Ham_II-20240818105500-KJP1-20240818055300"]}}-->

It looks like a plural form of llety. Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru gives all the following as plurals of llety: "lletyau, lletyoedd, lletyon, lletyfon, lletâu, lletai, lleteiau, lleteuon", and it defines the word as "lodging(s), billet, accommodation, quarters, dwelling, abode, inn; room, chamber; lodge (of Freemasons, &c.)". Ham II (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240818105500","author":"Ham II","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ham_II-20240818105500-KJP1-20240818055300","replies":["c-KJP1-20240818112200-Ham_II-20240818105500"]}}-->

Ham II - Great to hear from you, and many thanks. "Lodging" makes perfect sense. By the by, I've flagged a thought at Talk:Cathays Park which may interest you. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 11:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240818112200","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240818112200-Ham_II-20240818105500","replies":[]}}-->

British people has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240827204000","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20240827204000-Good_article_reassessment_for_British_people","replies":[]}}-->

After doing some brief browsing, I feel the Owain Glyndwr article is almost completed (except for 8 {{citations needed, and 3 {{pages needed) with almost 140 references. I think it could be nominated for a Wikipedia:Good article nominations after either removing the warrant text, or finding the sources and a copy edit just to make sure the article is worthy of a GA status. Anyone want to join in, help out etc? Cltjames (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240828165700","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240828165700-Owain_Glyndwr_article","replies":[]}}-->

Does anyone have any preference/is there any relevant guidance for naming an article on Pont Fawr? This is currently a redirect to Llanrwst. We could have: Pont Fawr, Pont Fawr, Llanrwst, or Llanrwst Bridge. Cadw calls it Pont Fawr in the Grade I listing (of which it has two), but Llanrwst Bridge in the Scheduled monument record. Coflein goes with Pont Fawr. For other Grade I listed bridges, we've generally gone for the anglicised name, with the exception of Pont Cysyllte. Not sure what the "common name" would be, probably Pont Fawr? Don't have any particular views myself. KJP1 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240830081100","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240830081100-Pont_Fawr","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240830083500-KJP1-20240830081100"]}}-->

I would go with Cadw and Pont Fawr. Tony Holkham (Talk) 08:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240830083500","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240830083500-KJP1-20240830081100","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240830091900-Tony_Holkham-20240830083500"]}}-->

Actually, I think the title should be Pont Fawr, Llanrwst, as Pont Fawr is probably not unique to use on its own. Tony Holkham (Talk) 09:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240830091900","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240830091900-Tony_Holkham-20240830083500","replies":["c-KJP1-20240830093200-Tony_Holkham-20240830091900"]}}-->

I also thought there would be more mentions of Pont Fawr than there actually are. I thought it would be like Ty Mawr, of which Monmouthshire alone as three. I notice this article, Tu Hwnt i'r Bont uses Pont Fawr, so I think we'll go with Pont Fawr, Llanrwst, but I'll give it a bit in case there are other views. KJP1 (talk) 09:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240830093200","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-KJP1-20240830093200-Tony_Holkham-20240830091900","replies":["c-Ham_II-20240830205900-KJP1-20240830093200"]}}-->

Wikidata can be good for checking this sort of thing. From that I see that there's a Pont Fawr in Llandderfel (Grade II*), a Pont Fawr in Aberdaron (Grade II), Bont Fawr/y Bont Fawr/Dolgellau Bridge (Grade II), a Pont Fawr aqueduct in Pont-rhyd-y-fen (Grade II*) and Bont-fawr ("a tiny hamlet in Carmarthenshire"). So Llanrwst at Grade I might still be the most significant one. It would also be the only one with an article if you decide to create one, and WP:D2D implies that in such situations no disambiguation is needed. Ham II (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240830205900","author":"Ham II","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Ham_II-20240830205900-KJP1-20240830093200","replies":["c-KJP1-20240831073200-Ham_II-20240830205900"]}}-->

Pont Fawr it is, though whether I've correctly handled the alternative/native language title in the infobox is another matter. KJP1 (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831073200","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-KJP1-20240831073200-Ham_II-20240830205900","replies":["c-Sionk-20240831101300-KJP1-20240831073200"]}}-->

Maybe worth BOLDing the alternative English language name, which is widely used (probably for ease of distinguising it from other big/main bridges). But clearly it's widely referred to as Pont Fawr in English language sources, beyond just Cadw. Sionk (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831101300","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Sionk-20240831101300-KJP1-20240831073200","replies":["c-KJP1-20240831110500-Sionk-20240831101300"]}}-->

Yes, I think that looks better. And I very much like the nifty tool Ham II has used to explain the "CR/CP" initials. Showing my lamentable ignorance of Welsh, why is "Great Bridge" "Pont Fawr" but "Great House" is "Ty Mawr"? KJP1 (talk) 11:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831110500","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-KJP1-20240831110500-Sionk-20240831101300","replies":["c-JimKillock-20240831111600-KJP1-20240831110500","c-Tony_Holkham-20240831112100-KJP1-20240831110500"]}}-->

Mutations - a soft mutation occurs in adjectives after a feminine noun in this case. Jim Killock (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831111600","author":"JimKillock","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-JimKillock-20240831111600-KJP1-20240831110500","replies":[],"displayName":"Jim Killock"}}-->

It's explained here: Consonant_mutation#Welsh, but it's easier (as a very basic learner) just to memorise the differences than understand the concept! Tony Holkham (Talk) 11:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831112100","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240831112100-KJP1-20240831110500","replies":["c-Sionk-20240831231700-Tony_Holkham-20240831112100"]}}-->

The language gods decided long ago that bridges were girls and houses were boys :) Sionk (talk) 23:17, 31 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240831231700","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-Sionk-20240831231700-Tony_Holkham-20240831112100","replies":[]}}-->

Hello WikiProject Wales:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 12:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240910125900","author":"Grnrchst","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Grnrchst-20240910125900-Women_in_Green's_October_2024_edit-a-thon","replies":[]}}-->

As a discussion at my talk has now spilled out concerning Criccieth Castle, as well as a discussion at Carreg Cennen Castle (which after a self-rvt my original edit was re-instated). I raise my edits and the way forward here. @A.D.Hope and Sirfurboy:

Between March and April this year, Cadw changed the names they use for some castles in Wales to the Welsh names for their website pages in English. For example, in March they had Caernarfon Castle, but then changed to Castell Caernarfon in April. (current) Cadw did not change all to Welsh names, for example Beaumaris Castle and Flint Castle remain, not Castell Biwmares and Castell y Fflint. They seem to have only changed castles in places where the place-name used is the same in both languages so "Conwy" and "Caernarfon" etc or minor spelling differences such as now using Castell Cricieth compared to in "Criccieth", but leave those with more significant/established differences.

On ~26 June I had boldly amended leads on the castles it affected from:

Caernarfon Castle (Welsh: Castell Caernarfon; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...

to

Caernarfon Castle (Welsh: Castell Caernarfon; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...

I had argued that as Cadw is the main operator for many of these that in effect their name change is an "official" name change, a now alternative name used in English, and one of significance. So applied MOS:BOLDALTNAMES, but maintained them in parenthesis and labelled Welsh, as the change is new, and not as common (yet). However, I self-reverted at Carreg Cennen Castle finding out that Cadw's website is not the sole website of the castle, and a castle site continues the use the English name so not universally official, but Sirfurboy argued that my original bolding should remain. I did revert myself at Llansteffan Castle as it is privately-owned. I didn't also apply Cadw's Welsh use at Cilgerran Castle as that is National Trust-owned which keep the English name.

But A.D.Hope disputed the bolding be added at Criccieth Castle. But after discussion alternatively proposed and tested the following:

Criccieth Castle, known in the Welsh language and marketed as Castell Cricieth ([kastɛɬ ˈkrɪkjɛθ]), is a ruined thirteenth-century castle ...

So should my original bolding be reverted? it remain? Or this alternative or other wording adopted?

Diolch. (note as of this comment Wayback Machine appears to be down?) DankJae 21:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709212500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240709212500-Cadw's_renaming_of_castles","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240709213600-DankJae-20240709212500","c-A.D.Hope-20240709214300-DankJae-20240709212500"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Before getting to another discussion, I think it's worth noting that I view this more as a discussion of how to best update the relevant articles to recognise Cadw's change in terminology, rather than a dispute with DankJae's edits per se. A.D.Hope (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709213600","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240709213600-DankJae-20240709212500","replies":[]}}-->

The position I'm coming round to is that, in choosing to use the Welsh names of certain sites in English-language contexts, Cadw is treating them as English names. If we look at Criccieth Castle, for example, nothing in the language or formatting suggests that Cadw is treating 'Castell Cricieth' as a Welsh phrase. On that basis, but acknowledging that this hasn't been confirmed by Cadw, the wording I've trialled at Criccieth Castle is an attempt to acknowledge that 'Castell Cricieth' is a Welsh phrase and primarily associated with the Welsh language, but is now also being used in English as a name for the site.

It's my understanding that the latest edition of Cadw's magazine (or maybe its newsletter?) contained an article about its new naming policy. If anyone has it handy that would be a great help. A.D.Hope (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709214300","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240709214300-DankJae-20240709212500","replies":["c-Sionk-20240709220600-A.D.Hope-20240709214300"]}}-->

I've no idea why we should be tripping over our own feet in eagerness to reflect whatever wording Cadw quietly use on their website for their castles. The vast majority of English language sources still use the English language. I've said many times, this is the English language Wikipedia and, if a subject has a commonly used and recognised English language name, then we should use that one. After all, Castell is simply Castle in Welsh, no need to be BOLDing it. Sionk (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709220600","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sionk-20240709220600-A.D.Hope-20240709214300","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240709221300-Sionk-20240709220600","c-DankJae-20240709221800-Sionk-20240709220600","c-Sirfurboy-20240709222800-Sionk-20240709220600"]}}-->

All of the articles about these sites will continue to use the English names as their titles and throughout the text. This discussion is about how to handle the Welsh names, which are generally mentioned in the first sentence anyway (see e.g. Strata Florida Abbey), but which Cadw is now using as the sole name in English contexts. A.D.Hope (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709221300","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240709221300-Sionk-20240709220600","replies":[]}}-->

@Sionk, well it is likely the beginning of Cadw using only the Welsh name in English, early days, so eventually another Bannau Brycheiniog. Just decided to recognise it by bolding it now, if it catches on more or only Cadw's does it for months, then a different approach would be taken. While this is English-language Wikipedia, we use names used in English not from English, if Cadw's use of Castell, just like we do at Castell Dinas Brân, becomes popular in English, we have to recognise it regardless if its from Welsh, or we'd be visiting Dinas Bran Castle.

Not denying the "... Castle" is still the common name for now. Just that "Castell ..." is now used "officially" as an alternative on some. The leads still start with English name, but whether the Welsh name should be boldened like Llyn Tegid, or whether it remains Welsh if used in English, is the issue. DankJae 22:18, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709221800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240709221800-Sionk-20240709220600","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

We are in MOS:BOLDALTNAMES territory here. That says:

Only the first occurrence of the title and significant alternative names (which should usually also redirect to the article) are placed in bold.

So where there is an incoming link and the alternative name is significant it may indeed be bolded. Whether Cadw rebranding under Welsh names is significant is something we can come to a view on here. To me that is likely significant for a bolded mention as DankJae had it. But the only one I went ahead and changed back was Castell Carreg Cennen, because that gets referred to that way in some English sources and on road signs etc. It lies in a place called Castell and sits in the woodlands known as Coed y Castell. I have often heard it referred to by that name by people speaking English. This puts it in a special class of Welsh castles, also including Castell y Bere, where the Welsh name does indeed seem to be significant for a mention. I have no strong opinion on the likes of Cilgerran and Llansteffan, although I think there is a reasonable case for bolding them all as Welsh names so long as there is an incoming link, and based on the fact that Cadw's literature now refers to them that way, and so it is reasonable that people would be searching for them under those names too. None of them, of course, should be renamed per WP:COMMONNAME.

I am not a fan of the "marketed as" text. The Welsh word might be better just listed as the Welsh name as we do for many places too. I am away from home this week, and my Cadw magazine is at home so I cannot consult that at this time. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709222800","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240709222800-Sionk-20240709220600","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240709224200-Sirfurboy-20240709222800"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I'd be happy to pause the discussion for a week until you can check your copy of Cadw's magazine, if everyone else is happy to do so and nobody else with a copy comes along in the meantime.

I wasn't entirely happy with the term 'marketed' myself. If we do decide to acknowledge Cadw's terminology change then I'm not sure if simply bolding the Welsh name is enough now that it's being used in English contexts, although I'm still not entirely sure if we do need to reflect the change. A.D.Hope (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240709224200","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240709224200-Sirfurboy-20240709222800","replies":["c-Geopersona-20240710090100-A.D.Hope-20240709224200"]}}-->

Just noting that with respect to Carreg Cennen Castle, it's not right that "It lies in a place called Castell", Castell is simply the name of the farm where visitors effectively begin their visit - a.k.a. Castle Farm. I'm struggling to recall any English speakers (visitors or locals) referring to the fortified place as Castell Carreg Cennen, other than in a deliberate act of using the Welsh name - that may change, but I'd be surprised if that was any time soon. Just to also observe, at a slight tangent, that this instance of preferential treatment of the Welsh name differs from that of the national park within which it sits, insofar as the NP name is set out at the end of a statutory process. Incidentally - in formal legal terms - despite all the hullabaloo, the name remains unchanged from 1957 as Brecon Beacons National Park/Parc Cenedlaethol Bannau Brycheiniog, per all legal notices still issued by that body. Geopersona (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710090100","author":"Geopersona","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Geopersona-20240710090100-A.D.Hope-20240709224200","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240710095600-Geopersona-20240710090100","c-Sirfurboy-20240710102700-Geopersona-20240710090100","c-DankJae-20240710205800-Geopersona-20240710090100"]}}-->

Yeah. Without doing a full analysis, you do see 'Carreg Cennen Castle' a fair bit. I think Bere is the only major masonry castle regularly referred to as 'castell' in English, although it's somewhat more common with smaller structures like Tomen Castell or hillforts like Castell Henllys. A.D.Hope (talk) 09:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710095600","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240710095600-Geopersona-20240710090100","replies":[]}}-->

The castle sits on the land of the farm, AKA Castell, which is how the land is referred to on OS Maps, so yes it lies in a place called Castell. Coflein references the English language work The Bone cave at Castell Carreg Cennen [8], it is widely described thus on the Internet (dating from its very first mention on the world wide web). Some examples, [9], [10]. This one titles it one way but the other in the text [11]. This is not a new thing [12] and there are many pictures that call it this. This one in the People's Collection [13] for instance, or this random less notable one [14]. It is this way in a lot of books. Some examples [15],[16], [17], [18]. Referred to this way in Archaeologia Cambrensis (English language) [19] Listed under carreg for the dictionary of Welsh Place names [20] and [21], and that's just a quick search. I can't speak to your anecdotal experience except to say my anecdotal experience is very different, but it is very clear that it is frequently referred to as Castell Carreg Cennen by people speaking English.

On your point about the National Parks, I do not understand what you are saying, and wonder if you may have misunderstood the proposal here. Brecon Beacons National Park has the term Bannau Brycheiniog National Park bolded. That is, the Welsh name of the park, now adopted by the park authority to describe it in English, is bolded in our article - but the article title remains the WP:COMMONNAME. That is exactly what is proposed here, isn't it? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 10:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710102700","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240710102700-Geopersona-20240710090100","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240710111400-Sirfurboy-20240710102700"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

There are sources which use "Carreg Cennen Castle", for example Visit Wales, but I'll only go to the effort of collating them if we decide to make a change to that article.

I don't want to turn this into a discussion of the Brecon Beacons, but looking at the naming there might help us understand this issue. There are currently three names for the park:

• Brecon Beacons National Park, the fully English name
• Parc Cenedlaethol Bannau Brycheiniog, the fully Welsh name
• Bannau Brycheiniog National Park, the English name which uses the Welsh name for the area

The first and third names are included in bold the lead of the article, as they're used in English, but the Welsh name is only included in the infobox. This contrasts with Snowdonia, where the national park does not have a separate article, and where the lead sentence begins "Snowdonia, or Eryri" as both names are used in English.

On that basis, I'd say that the Cadw issue boils down to whether we consider what were formerly just the Welsh names for the sites to now be additional English names or not. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710111400","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240710111400-Sirfurboy-20240710102700","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240710111900-A.D.Hope-20240710111400"]}}-->

Yes, of course there are many places calling it Carreg Cennen Castle. More of them. That is the common name. Surely that is not at issue. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710111900","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240710111900-A.D.Hope-20240710111400","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240710113200-Sirfurboy-20240710111900"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

No, the issue is whether 'Castell Carreg Cennen' should be treated as entirely Welsh or as an alternative English name. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710113200","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240710113200-Sirfurboy-20240710111900","replies":["c-Sionk-20240710123400-A.D.Hope-20240710113200"]}}-->

We don't bold "château de Versailles" on the Palace of Versailles article (despite "Château de Versailles" often being used in English language sources), so I don't see why we should be bolding the Welsh names for Welsh castles. Cadw is a Welsh organisation, with a Welsh name themselves, operating in Wales. Certainly if they chose to promote their properties under the Welsh language names it may encourage English speakers to use the Welsh name more often ...but I certainly doubt the Welsh language names have suddenly become English. Sionk (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710123400","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-Sionk-20240710123400-A.D.Hope-20240710113200","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240710124000-Sionk-20240710123400"]}}-->

Is it right to treat 'Castell Carreg Cennen', to focus on that example, as soley the Welsh name for the castle when it's used in many English language sources? A.D.Hope (talk) 12:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710124000","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240710124000-Sionk-20240710123400","replies":[]}}-->

@Geopersona, Legal names don't really matter themselves, especially if they're not used anymore. Wikipedia in the end is guided by what sources use today and in some way what readers are familliar with, not what it is referred to in a decades old document. We don't call Gwynedd, "Caernarfonshire and Merionethshire" even though that is what is still used in the 1994 act.

Nonetheless my initial rationale of Castell Carreg Cennen, is that a prominent organisation Cadw, in some ways the national heritage organisation, in which has importance, use the Welsh name in English, so felt it is now an alternative name in need of increased prominence. We're still in the early days if these do catch on, so may be I was early and a review needed in a few months. Just like Bannau Brycheiniog NP is now an alternative and possibly the common name now (recent source-wise), but a discussion for that talk. DankJae 20:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240710205800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-DankJae-20240710205800-Geopersona-20240710090100","replies":["c-DankJae-20240713170000-DankJae-20240710205800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@A.D.Hope, @Geopersona, @Sionk, @Sirfurboy

In light of Cadw's birthday some sources are now mentioning Cadw (but independent of) and their castles, and these sources use "Castell" now for the ones Cadw changed. So Cadw's changes are starting to be adopted now, but of course just starting, nothing common,

These now have used Castell for:

DFP - Rhuddlan, Caernarfon, Harlech (same article as in the Leader, some since May and Rhyl Journal)

ITV - Caergwle

Nation.Cymru - Conwy, Oxwich, Caernarfon, Cricieth, Harlech, Rhuddlan[22]

WalesOnline - Harlech

Visit Wales - Caernarfon

Daily Post combined Dolwyddelan's and used Dolbadarn's even before Cadw.

So does this justify my approach more? Once again, not arguing it is the common name, or even that it needs to be considered English, but just bolding it to signify that it is not just purely a name only used in Welsh and is used alternatively in English.

So should they be bold or not? Should they remain tagged as Welsh or not? Parenthesis or not?

Note: the Versailles website, uses "Palace of Versailles" throughout the website in English (bar the French logo), the point I'm arguing is that the comparable websites for these castles no longer use the English name, so not as comparable. DankJae 17:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713170000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-DankJae-20240713170000-DankJae-20240710205800","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240713180000-DankJae-20240713170000"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I'd take the approach that the Welsh names have now become alternative English names in these cases, which I believe means they don't need to be in parentheses or specifically tagged as Welsh (although the latter is desirable). I'd consider them notable names as they're used by Cadw and now in at least some of the media. My preferred wording would be something like:

"Criccieth Castle, also known in both English and Welsh as Castell Cricieth..."

If this is too wordy, then simply "Criccieth Castle, or Castell Cricieth...", perhaps with a sentence on the name somewhere in the body. A.D.Hope (talk) 18:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713180000","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240713180000-DankJae-20240713170000","replies":["c-DankJae-20240713182700-A.D.Hope-20240713180000"]}}-->

@A.D.Hope I do believe the latter should be the ultimate wording until commonname changes to the title, but still prefer (Welsh: Castell ...) until at least a dozen sources use the new names regularly. I guess I'm having my own "phased approach", but I did find more sources using Castell than expected, but still only the start. DankJae 18:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713182700","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-DankJae-20240713182700-A.D.Hope-20240713180000","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240713222400-DankJae-20240713182700"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

My line of thought is:

• Cadw manage these sites, so the names it uses for them are significant; if they are not the article title, they warrant a mention in the lead.
• Cadw have made a definitive shift to using the Welsh names of some of its sites exclusively in English-language contexts. The media is begining to follow this usage.
• Cadw and the media do not treat these names as foreign in English-language contexts, e.g. they are not italicised.
• We should therefore treat these names as alternative English-language names, which means bold but no italics.
• Nevertheless, it's important to indicate that these names originate in and are closely associated with the Welsh language.

It's on this basis that I suggested the wording above, which I think neatly explains the situation in flowing prose. However, I wouldn't object to something like (alternative English, Welsh: Castell [X]), which conveys essentially same information in parentheses. Perhaps 'alternative' has connotations of 'secondary', though? A.D.Hope (talk) 22:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713222400","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240713222400-DankJae-20240713182700","replies":["c-DankJae-20240713224300-A.D.Hope-20240713222400"]}}-->

Only prefer a layered approach, should multiple sources especially UK-wide quickly follow suit (so like three more) then I'd support "Castle or Castell" wording. It's not helping that Cadw haven't publicly announced this change so little media attention, and not wanting to be too WP:OFFICIALNAMEy, adopting it so eagerly before many readers have even heard of it.

"Eryri" was quickly added as "or" because of how much attention (and edit wars) it generated, and it became clear it had to be accommodated. Cadw has been very (publicly) silent on this? so we can't go ahead of the curve, but still believe something had to be done. Not helping that castles are much less reported. Nonetheless, that's why I ask it here to see what format is preferred.

Mine is simply that I believe "(Welsh: Castell) is best for now due to how quiet the rename has been, but fully prefer "Castle, or Castell," when the change is more public and/or more sources use it.

Alternatively, we switch the infobox name to the Welsh name, and leave the lead alone. DankJae 22:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713224300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-DankJae-20240713224300-A.D.Hope-20240713222400","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240713225200-DankJae-20240713224300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I mean, does it really matter how loud Cadw have been or how many edit wars have ensued (or not, thankfully, in this case)? The outcome is ultimately the same.

I would suggest not just changing the infobox, it seems like a bit of a halfway measure which doesn't really settle the issue. A.D.Hope (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713225200","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":13,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240713225200-DankJae-20240713224300","replies":[]}}-->

This is what is in Cadw's Heritage in Wales magazine on this change:

Preserving our Welsh language

During spring 2024, Cadw started on a journey to review and standardise the names of the sites in our care. We have made our site names more accurate and consistent and are raising awareness of the Welsh names of our historic monuments and encouraging people to use them.

Where there is little difference between the Welsh and English names for a monument - such as for many of our iconic sites like Castell Cricieth - Cadw will now only use the Welsh version of the name; you will notice the change in this edition of Heritage in Wales magazine. We already use just one name for some sites such as Pennarth Fawr and Plas Mawr in north Wales, and Castell Coch in south Wales.

We are taking a phased approach to standardise Cadw site names with guidance from the Welsh Language Commissioner's Place-names Standardisation Panel.

The Welsh Government, of which we are a part, has a commitment to safeguarding and promoting Welsh place names. We hope you will join us in celebrating our language, culture and heritage through this process.

Diolch. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713181200","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240713181200-Cadw's_renaming_of_castles","replies":["c-DankJae-20240713182400-Sirfurboy-20240713181200","c-A.D.Hope-20240713182500-Sirfurboy-20240713181200"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

I had theorised this was standardised related, but thanks for a more clearer statement from them. Although their mention of a "phased approach" seems to signal more are to come, so keep a heads up. DankJae 18:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713182400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240713182400-Sirfurboy-20240713181200","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Well, that all makes sense to me; thank you for taking the time to type that out, Sirfurboy. In some cases, such as Criccieth/Cricieth and Penarth/Pennarth Fawr, I don't think the difference is even between 'English' and 'Welsh' names so much as alternative Welsh spellings.

What this will presumably mean for us is that all Cadw-related publications will use the Welsh names in future. In my opinion that makes them significant alternative names (i.e. bold and in the lead) where they're not already the aticle title, although it doesn't inherently make them the common name for title purposes. A.D.Hope (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240713182500","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240713182500-Sirfurboy-20240713181200","replies":["c-Murgatroyd49-20240715063600-A.D.Hope-20240713182500"]}}-->

Just an observation, but I can't help thinking this is a reaction to the declining use of the Welsh language in Wales. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715063600","author":"Murgatroyd49","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Murgatroyd49-20240715063600-A.D.Hope-20240713182500","replies":["c-DankJae-20240715103000-Murgatroyd49-20240715063600"]}}-->

Possibly, especially after the census recorded a decline. The standard list was made in 2018, but only has since been acted on, so possibly due to the recent decline, increase in language activism and nationalism, and gov agreements with Plaid.

But all guesswork. DankJae 10:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715103000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240715103000-Murgatroyd49-20240715063600","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Survey because I did ask for third opinions, but needing clarity and sources using it above. @A.D.Hope, Geopersona, Sionk, and Sirfurboy: (those above)

• TLDR from discussion above, Cadw started using the Welsh names for some castles, as part of the same initiative. Some media has followed since, therefore should their Welsh names be considered alternative (not common yet) names and how?

How and should the Welsh names, of the few castles Cadw has renamed, be formatted in the top of articles?

• 1) No change i.e. Caernarfon Castle (Welsh: Castell Caernarfon; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...
• 2) Change (see options below)
• 3) Local change, suspend centralised discussion for local discussions

If 2, which of the following:

• a) Bolding Welsh i.e. Caernarfon Castle (Welsh: Castell Caernarfon; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...
• b) As Welsh, but no {{lang-cy}} i.e. Caernarfon Castle (alternatively known by its Welsh name Castell Caernarfon; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...
• c) As English, known as i.e. Caernarfon Castle ([specific word] known as Castell Caernarfon [or specific phrase]; Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]) is a medieval fortress ...
• d) Equal i.e. Caernarfon Castle, or Castell Caernarfon (Welsh pronunciation: [kastɛɬ kaɨrˈnarvɔn]), is a medieval fortress ...
• e) Other, like Welsh name in infobox only.

Please select as many options as you're open to, due to the multiple options given, and help to establish some consensus.

Unless the outcome is clear or called for an early closure, I suggest to leave this survey up for like a month (yes a month). I'll add a post to each castle affected, and if necessary restore the previous leads (do I?). The outcome of this should last until sufficient evidence supports a change, as raised in a new discussion here or at each article, and not by me. The outcome should be enforced on articles affected until consensus states otherwise. Titles are not affected by this. Thanks DankJae 20:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714201500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240714201500-Survey","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240714204800-DankJae-20240714201500","c-Sionk-20240714210500-DankJae-20240714201500","c-Sirfurboy-20240714222100-DankJae-20240714201500","c-A.D.Hope-20240715110300-DankJae-20240714201500","c-KJP1-20240716071300-DankJae-20240714201500"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Just to make you aware, the group of articles affected is larger and also includes e.g. Capel Gwydir Uchaf, Capel Llugwy, and Capel Runston. There are also some minor changes, such as Blaenafon Ironworks (from Blaenafon), Caer-went Roman Town (from Caerwent), and Pennarth Fawr (from Penarth). A.D.Hope (talk) 20:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714204800","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240714204800-DankJae-20240714201500","replies":["c-DankJae-20240714221400-A.D.Hope-20240714204800"]}}-->

Hmn fair, but those are kinda all more individual specific cases so may be better those have local discussions depending on the outcome here. "Castell" instead of "Castle" is much more straight forward than changing the name of the place itself (bar Cricieth and Coety). But yes didn't notice them. DankJae 22:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714221400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240714221400-A.D.Hope-20240714204800","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240715110600-DankJae-20240714221400"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

The use of 'capel' rather than 'chapel' should be rolled into this discussion, but the impact of Cadw's changes to the place names in English could probably be decided article-by-article. A.D.Hope (talk) 11:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715110600","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715110600-DankJae-20240714221400","replies":["c-DankJae-20240715152400-A.D.Hope-20240715110600"]}}-->

Well I've already started this so no idea how to roll it in at this stage, may be just add an extra question? DankJae 15:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715152400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240715152400-A.D.Hope-20240715110600","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240715165000-DankJae-20240715152400"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@Geopersona, @Sionk, @Sirfurboy, are you happy to work on the understanding that this discussion applies to all Cadw sites where the name has significantly changed, not just the castles? I think the three chapels mentioned above are the only other sites this currently applies to, but there might be some others we've missed. A.D.Hope (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715165000","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715165000-DankJae-20240715152400","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240715171200-A.D.Hope-20240715165000"]}}-->

Yes, happy, although we appear to be a long way from a clear consensus! Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715171200","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240715171200-A.D.Hope-20240715165000","replies":["c-DankJae-20240715203500-Sirfurboy-20240715171200"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

@A.D.Hope, not the sites where Cadw has only changed the place-name. Those are more subtle, so may not be as adopted. Best case-by-case for those, if such a minor change is adopted or considered just another minor spelling. Using Castell over Castle is more obvious and intentional than Blaenavon and Blaenafon. Plus I did hold back on applying this policy on sites which are also managed by other organisations such as the National Trust or privately-owned. DankJae 20:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715203500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-DankJae-20240715203500-Sirfurboy-20240715171200","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240715214100-DankJae-20240715203500"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Yes, by 'significantly changed' I meant the likes of castle to 'castell' and chapel to 'capel' rather than tweaks to place names. Apologies if that wasn't clear. A.D.Hope (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715214100","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715214100-DankJae-20240715203500","replies":[]}}-->

• 1 - the status quo is fine at the moment, there's no need to eagerly change everything based on the actions of one website, even if it is the website of the Welsh body that manages these sites. These sites have always had an alternative name to the English one, but it is a Welsh alternative and we deal with non-English names by putting them in brackets (non-bolded) in the lead sentence. I used the example of the Palace of Versailles above, English language sources often use the French name, Château de Versailles, but we don't bold it on the English Wikipedia article. Sionk (talk) 21:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714210500","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sionk-20240714210500-DankJae-20240714201500","replies":["c-DankJae-20240714221000-Sionk-20240714210500"]}}-->

  I did mention that at least the Versailles website uses "Palace of Versailles" themselves, Cadw clearly isn't anymore. DankJae 22:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714221000","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240714221000-Sionk-20240714210500","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

• 2d is my preference. 2a is also fine. I think Sionk's point is reasonable, and if we had no agreement, 1 is a reasonable default option. "fine at the moment" sounds right. However, as above, MOS:BOLDALTNAMES allows that significant alternatives may be bolded as long as there is also an incoming link (which we can ensure). The reason I think these meet the definition of significance is that the statutory heritage body entrusted with their care, and an arm of Welsh Government, are only referring to them thus. Visit Wales are also part of Welsh Government and are likely to follow suit. People will thus start searching for these on those names. They are not the common name (except the likes of Castell Coch and Castell y Bere) but they are significant. I agree there's no rush. You could even make this an RfC if you wanted wider editor inpit. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714222100","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240714222100-DankJae-20240714201500","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240714222200-Sirfurboy-20240714222100","c-A.D.Hope-20240715180800-Sirfurboy-20240714222100"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

  And, in fact, I am fine with option 3 too... so um... not exactly decisive there ;) Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240714222200","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240714222200-Sirfurboy-20240714222100","replies":[],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

  The flaw with 2d, as I see it, is that it doesn't associate the 'Castell' form with the Welsh language. A.D.Hope (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715180800","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715180800-Sirfurboy-20240714222100","replies":["c-Sirfurboy-20240715185700-A.D.Hope-20240715180800"]}}-->

  Yes I considered that. But that is the thing. If the word becomes an English usage it is only Welsh in the way "rendezvous" is French, or "zeitgeist" is German. It is a potential flaw of the policy. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715185700","author":"Sirfurboy","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Sirfurboy-20240715185700-A.D.Hope-20240715180800","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240715193300-Sirfurboy-20240715185700"],"displayName":"Sirfurboy\ud83c\udfc4"}}-->

  I see where you're coming from, but at the moment we're dealing with names which were until recently almost exclusively Welsh-language and which are still heavily associated with that language. If they become thoroughly Anglicised we can deal with that at a later date. A.D.Hope (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715193300","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715193300-Sirfurboy-20240715185700","replies":["c-Sionk-20240715230500-A.D.Hope-20240715193300"]}}-->

  If other organisations and media were to follow the lead of Cadw in promoting the Welsh language names, the situation might change. But they haven't yet, have they? Sionk (talk) 23:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715230500","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Sionk-20240715230500-A.D.Hope-20240715193300","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240715231500-Sionk-20240715230500"]}}-->

  They have, as @DankJae showed in his post at 17:00 on the 13th, above. A.D.Hope (talk) 23:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715231500","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715231500-Sionk-20240715230500","replies":["c-Sionk-20240716092800-A.D.Hope-20240715231500"]}}-->

  Thanks, silly me. Though the majority of those articles are undigested repeats of a CADW press release about their 40th birthday. I'd still stand by by point that the tail is wagging the dog here. Sionk (talk) 09:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240716092800","author":"Sionk","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-Sionk-20240716092800-A.D.Hope-20240715231500","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240716101400-Sionk-20240716092800"]}}-->

  I do think that those articles are a good example of how the press tend to just use whatever name is on the press release rather than formally choosing a position – it was similar with the Brecon Beacons and Snowdonia. 'Just going along with it' is arguably a choice in itself, mind.

  I'm not sure if the tail is wagging the dog, though. What's proposed is a small change which will in some way acknowledge that the Welsh names are now used in English, which is definitely true. It is early days, but given Cadw have a lot of sway over the sites their position does carry quite a lot of weight. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240716101400","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240716101400-Sionk-20240716092800","replies":[]}}-->

• 2e: my preference is to treat the names as both Welsh and English. I've given suggestions as to how this could be done in the discussion above, but for the sake of keeping everything in one place two options are

  [Name] Castle, also known in both English and Welsh as Castell [Name]

  and

  [Name] Castle (Welsh, alternate English: Castell [Name])

  A.D.Hope (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240715110300","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240715110300-DankJae-20240714201500","replies":["c-JimKillock-20240818124500-A.D.Hope-20240715110300"]}}-->

  That works for me. Jim Killock (talk) 12:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240818124500","author":"JimKillock","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JimKillock-20240818124500-A.D.Hope-20240715110300","replies":[],"displayName":"Jim Killock"}}-->

• 2a: - for preference, but I could as easily go with other 2. options. I understand the view that 1. is currently best, given CommonName and the fact that most sources currently use those. But I think it is significant that the responsible Welsh heritage body, following Welsh Government policy, has began a process of name alterations. Cadw's "journey" (yuck) is recent, but it is highly relevant, and over time the sources will follow it. For me, we should probably recognise and reflect that now. But I can also live with a waiting policy. KJP1 (talk) 07:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240716071300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240716071300-DankJae-20240714201500","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for copying me into this - I've been very busy with other matters this last few weeks so have been nowhere near WP. I've nothing to add at this point as the matter would seem to have had a good airing and I've no strong preferences. Geopersona (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240723073900","author":"Geopersona","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Geopersona-20240723073900-Survey","replies":["c-Deb-20240723074800-Geopersona-20240723073900","c-KJP1-20240728072700-Geopersona-20240723073900","c-The_ed17-20240811003500-Geopersona-20240723073900","c-JimKillock-20240812092300-Geopersona-20240723073900"]}}-->

• 1: As we're in English Wikipedia, I think we should carry on as we're doing until the Welsh names become commonplace. Deb (talk) 07:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240723074800","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Deb-20240723074800-Geopersona-20240723073900","replies":[]}}-->

• Just as one indicator of media trends, I see that the Monmouthshire Beacon is now using Castell Caernarfon, Castell Coety, Castell Conwy and Castell Harlech, [23]. KJP1 (talk) 07:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240728072700","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240728072700-Geopersona-20240723073900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240810195500-KJP1-20240728072700"]}}-->

  Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom. DankJae 19:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240810195500","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240810195500-KJP1-20240728072700","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

• 1: We don't yet have enough evidence yet, nor has enough time lapsed, to say if the Welsh government-preferred spelling is being adopted in enough English-language sources. Let's keep the status quo until we see more. If that happens we would probably want to go for 2d because they'll no longer be Welsh-only alternative names. (All that said, if those sources widely adopt the names, we should probably have a RfC to determine if we should rename the article titles per WP:UE and WP:MODERNPLACENAME.) Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240811003500","author":"The ed17","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-The_ed17-20240811003500-Geopersona-20240723073900","replies":["c-The_ed17-20240811003500-The_ed17-20240811003500"],"displayName":"Ed"}}-->
  • Also, I'm thinking that the lengthy 2b is untenable per the spirit of MOS:LEADLANG, which advises against including "particularly lengthy names" because that "clutters the lead sentence and impairs readability". While the names themselves aren't long, the proposed text is. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240811003500","author":"The ed17","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-The_ed17-20240811003500-The_ed17-20240811003500","replies":[],"displayName":"Ed"}}-->
• 2d: because both names are already established in English if Cadw promotes the Welsh version in English materials. Fairly rapidly these will appear in international and tourism contexts relying on Cadw. Official usage and some journalists will lean to the Welsh as the "official" name. It seems clear that the term is Wels also as the Welsh pronunciation is given. 2a suggests to a reader, rather than a Wikipedian, that the Welsh name is not normally used in English. It's best to recognise this change to use the Welsh name in English materials in a form that is neutral, rather than risk offence and edit wars as this rapidly becomes more commonplace. --Jim Killock (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240812092300","author":"JimKillock","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JimKillock-20240812092300-Geopersona-20240723073900","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240812104100-JimKillock-20240812092300"],"displayName":"Jim Killock"}}-->

  • Might the fact that your comment is written mostly in the future tense suggest that we're putting the cart before the horse a little? The change is still very new, and as far as I'm aware the articles have remained stable besides the initial edits made by @DankJae and myself before this discussion was opened. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240812104100","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240812104100-JimKillock-20240812092300","replies":["c-JimKillock-20240812112600-A.D.Hope-20240812104100"]}}-->

    I understood I could be read that way but tbh Cadw's use of the term ought to be sufficient as they are promoting it. The rest of my comment should be read as expectation that its usage will be reinforced given the prominence and influence that Cadw have over the use of the name. Jim Killock (talk) 11:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240812112600","author":"JimKillock","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JimKillock-20240812112600-A.D.Hope-20240812104100","replies":[],"displayName":"Jim Killock"}}-->

@A.D.Hope, Deb, Geopersona, JimKillock, KJP1, Sionk, Sirfurboy, and The ed17: Well it's been more than a month, with a bit of a delay (sorry I'm busy). So if I counted correctly:

So there's a weak first preference for a change (4 v 3), but no agreement on one, with some stating we should restore the original for now. If you're wondering on my vote, I'd prefer 2a (as originally done), but then agree with 1 as a default, then would prefer 2d (when more sources use it). If there is another discussion in the future, we can trim it to 1 or 2d, or plus 2a or 2e by A.D.Hope. If including my votes it will be trimmed to 1, 2a and 2d as future options.

Anyway, should I basically revert my edits? Will do so if there is no objection here. Sorry for making this pointless. Hope you enjoyed your holidays if you had them. Diolch DankJae 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240903215900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240903215900-Survey","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240904082300-DankJae-20240903215900","c-KJP1-20240908081800-DankJae-20240903215900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Now that the initial discussion following Cadw's change has died down, I have come round to the idea that it would be better to wait and see how things pan out. That would mean reverting your initial round of edits, DankJae, but it certainly doesn't mean this discussion was pointless. On the contrary, I think you handled it very well and that 'actually, we don't need to change anything' is a perfectly valid outcome.

Maybe we should revisit the issue in a year or so? See if Cadw have started publishing guidebooks under the Welsh names or if there's more evidence of English media outlets using them? A.D.Hope (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904082300","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240904082300-DankJae-20240903215900","replies":[]}}-->

It was by no means a pointless discussion, but the current consensus is quite understandable. However, in more and more of the media coverage that I see relating to this issue, the outlets are following Cadw's lead. I'm pretty sure we will need to re-visit the issue, but the discussion we've had here will likely make it easier to reach a decision when we do. KJP1 (talk) 08:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240908081800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240908081800-DankJae-20240903215900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240910223300-KJP1-20240908081800"]}}-->

Reverted my edits DankJae 22:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240910223300","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DankJae-20240910223300-KJP1-20240908081800","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240911163600-DankJae-20240910223300"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

I hope this hasn't left you deflated, DankJae. The discussion was definitely worthwhile, and I think we'll return to the topic sooner rather than later as things develop. A.D.Hope (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911163600","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240911163600-DankJae-20240910223300","replies":[]}}-->

I've been looking at the coverage of Welsh Grade I listed buildings. It's quite a healthy position: twenty of the Principal Areas (PA) have full coverage, either with standalone articles or with re-directs to sections in wider articles. That leaves one PA with a total of four gaps (Blaenau Gwent doesn't have any). The "missing" articles are all for churches, and the current position is (the numbers are the Cadw identifiers):

• All done.

If anybody has the time/inclination to pick any of these up and get a Start article going, it would be greatly appreciated. Although I appreciate it's a niche interest! The best sources are the Cadw and Coflein databases, and I can provide the relevant Buildings of Wales entries if needed. KJP1 (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240903135300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240903135300-Welsh_Grade_I_listed_buildings","replies":["c-DankJae-20240903214600-KJP1-20240903135300"]}}-->

I'll try, especially those near me. Noticed all largely the north. :) DankJae 21:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240903214600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240903214600-KJP1-20240903135300","replies":["c-KJP1-20240904043500-DankJae-20240903214600"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Many thanks. There’s no hurry, of course. And yes, I noticed that northern bias. I wonder why. More editors based in/with connections to the south? Greater availability of sources? KJP1 (talk) 04:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904043500","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240904043500-DankJae-20240903214600","replies":["c-A.D.Hope-20240904081800-KJP1-20240904043500"]}}-->

Quite possibly. It's noticeable that Welsh topics have somewhat patchy coverage and that the articles themselves aren't always of the highest quality; on YouTube, the channel Cambrian Chronicles covers Welsh history in some depth and it's a bit of a running joke that he always finds something wrong on Wikipedia. Articles like kingdom of Gwynedd really do need addressing. Personally, I'm hoping to bump Erddig and Penarth Fawr up to 'good' in the near future. A.D.Hope (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904081800","author":"A.D.Hope","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-A.D.Hope-20240904081800-KJP1-20240904043500","replies":["c-Cltjames-20240904212400-A.D.Hope-20240904081800"]}}-->

For the record, I didnt actually do much work on the Kingdom of Gwynedd article itself, just added references, proofreading and a few paragraphs. But from what I've grasped, whoever wrote the article did a decent job in going through the timeline of Kings. But, I feel it's more of a biographical outlook than an article about the kingdom. But I don't think Cambrian Chronicles mentions the Kingdom of Gwynedd article, only the List of rulers in Wales and Cadwaladr had erroneous entries. Otherwise, I added a sentence about Penarth Fawr from a digital book I have. Cltjames (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904212400","author":"Cltjames","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Cltjames-20240904212400-A.D.Hope-20240904081800","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240904152900-Cltjames-20240904212400"]}}-->

I'm not sure whether to use infobox building or church. I have tended to use church for churches. Does it matter a great deal, or is it better to use building for listed structures? Tony Holkham (Talk) 15:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904152900","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240904152900-Cltjames-20240904212400","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240904153600-Tony_Holkham-20240904152900"]}}-->

I now see there is an infobox religious building. I've created a few, and used all three infoboxes without any apparent reason for each, so have confused myself, it seems. Tony Holkham (Talk) 15:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904153600","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240904153600-Tony_Holkham-20240904152900","replies":["c-KJP1-20240904153700-Tony_Holkham-20240904153600"]}}-->

Tony, you’re on a roll! Many thanks. I tend to use the church IB. It doesn’t, as far as I know, allow for the multiple listing designations which I like in the Historic site IB, which can be a pity as you often have a listed lychgate/cross etc. But it does give you parish/priest/diocese etc., which is useful. KJP1 (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904153700","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-KJP1-20240904153700-Tony_Holkham-20240904153600","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240904154400-KJP1-20240904153700"]}}-->

Thanks, KJP1. Sometime I'll review what I've created and see whether any should be changed. Tony Holkham (Talk) 15:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904154400","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240904154400-KJP1-20240904153700","replies":["c-DankJae-20240904162200-Tony_Holkham-20240904154400"]}}-->

@KJP1, I think you can embed the multiple listings of historic sites IB into Church IB, tried at User:DankJae/sandbox/3.

Had used it for Building IB at General Market, Wrexham as long as its okay the listings are at the bottom of the IB and some minor gaps on mobile? DankJae 16:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904162200","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-DankJae-20240904162200-Tony_Holkham-20240904154400","replies":["c-KJP1-20240904201000-DankJae-20240904162200"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Dank - That looks good. I shall try it with the next one. KJP1 (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904201000","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-KJP1-20240904201000-DankJae-20240904162200","replies":[]}}-->

DankJae - so, I tried an embedded multiple designation. The result was not a success, [24]. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? KJP1 (talk) 10:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905105500","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KJP1-20240905105500-Welsh_Grade_I_listed_buildings","replies":["c-DankJae-20240905112800-KJP1-20240905105500"]}}-->

@KJP1, you just forgot the extra }}

As there’s both {{Infobox church}} and {{Infobox historic site}} for the two {{ you need the two closing }} DankJae 11:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905112800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-DankJae-20240905112800-KJP1-20240905105500","replies":[],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

@KJP1, @Tony Holkham, can I take Flintshire for now? Because you two took my county :( it's fine DankJae 17:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905175600","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DankJae-20240905175600-Welsh_Grade_I_listed_buildings","replies":["c-KJP1-20240905181600-DankJae-20240905175600"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

DankJae - Sorry! Flintshire is all yours. I am working through Powys, and will move on to Gwynedd. Then we can assess the situation. If anyone else has a particular affection for the Welsh Riviera, Conwy and Denbighshire is available! KJP1 (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905181600","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-KJP1-20240905181600-DankJae-20240905175600","replies":["c-KJP1-20240905182300-KJP1-20240905181600","c-Tony_Holkham-20240905193300-KJP1-20240905181600"]}}-->

p.s. The Church in Wales Heritage Records, [25] and CPAT, [26] have proved VERY useful sources. A fair amount is lifted from Cadw/Pevsner but there is much additional material. KJP1 (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905182300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-KJP1-20240905182300-KJP1-20240905181600","replies":[]}}-->

No probs. I'll take whatever, but probably not until next week, sorry. Tony Holkham (Talk) 19:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905193300","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240905193300-KJP1-20240905181600","replies":["c-DankJae-20240905231900-Tony_Holkham-20240905193300"]}}-->

 Done Flintshire 27. A bit rough, haven't done a church in a while, and surprisingly sources had quite a bit. But its late. DankJae 23:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240905231900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-DankJae-20240905231900-Tony_Holkham-20240905193300","replies":["c-DankJae-20240910223800-DankJae-20240905231900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

 Done Flintshire 321, also a bit rough. Will still try and improve them both overtime, the sources had quite a bit. DankJae 22:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240910223800","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-DankJae-20240910223800-DankJae-20240905231900","replies":["c-KJP1-20240911121700-DankJae-20240910223800"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

DankJae, Tony Holkham - With thanks to DankJae and Tony, we're now done with these, having a standalone Start, or a reasonable re-direct to a section of a larger article, for all of Wales' Grade Is. They can certainly be improved/expanded, but they give basic information to readers, and provide a starting point for other editors. KJP1 (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911121700","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-KJP1-20240911121700-DankJae-20240910223800","replies":["c-DankJae-20240911123900-KJP1-20240911121700"]}}-->

great work! You two were speeding through.

Of course the next goal is the other Grades but there’s so much more of those. So slowly going through them already (locally). DankJae 12:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911123900","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-DankJae-20240911123900-KJP1-20240911121700","replies":["c-KJP1-20240911124500-DankJae-20240911123900"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

The problem with II*s and IIs, apart from the sheer numbers!, is WP:RS. The II*s are hard enough, but for the Grade IIs, beyond Cadw and Coflein, it’s a real struggle. But you’re right, no reason not to try. KJP1 (talk) 12:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911124500","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-KJP1-20240911124500-DankJae-20240911123900","replies":["c-DankJae-20240911135400-KJP1-20240911124500"]}}-->

@KJP1, agree there’s likely less sources, especially for individual listed buildings on a terrace. Hence for Wrexham, I group a bunch of them together, usually by street or area. As having their own stubs would be pointless. Plus allows for greater context, but aware that the streets don't inherit the notability. DankJae 13:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911135400","author":"DankJae","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-DankJae-20240911135400-KJP1-20240911124500","replies":["c-KJP1-20240911140300-DankJae-20240911135400"],"displayName":"Dank"}}-->

Victoria Terrace, Beaumaris was great for sourcing as Cadw listed each of the twenty apartments individually. But each report says the same thing! KJP1 (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911140300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-KJP1-20240911140300-DankJae-20240911135400","replies":["c-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700-KJP1-20240911140300"]}}-->

I've just counted the Grade II* list in Pembrokeshire and it came to 186. I've added one, but there may be others missing, and some are missing wikilinks, so quite a bit of work there. Interesting, though, and the above comments are very helpful. Cheers, T. Tony Holkham (Talk) 14:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911142700","author":"Tony Holkham","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700-KJP1-20240911140300","replies":["c-KJP1-20240911164600-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700","c-KJP1-20240912072300-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700"]}}-->

I find grouping them, by location, function etc. can help. You’ve got half a dozen dovecotes, so with a model for those, you could probably repurpose some of the general history of dovecotes, and make it specific with the Cadw/Coflein/Pevsner. Then you’ve got 18 entires at Pembroke Dock, so a Listed buildings section there would allow you to mention them, and link them, under sub-headings, and a paragraph on each. Not as good, perhaps, as 18 standalones, but quicker! Alternatively, a separate article, “Listed buildings at Pembroke Dock”? Lastly, you’ve some estates, e.g. Cilwendeg Farm (three) where one article could cover the house/stables/gates/whatever. It just helps to make the 186 slightly less daunting! KJP1 (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240911164600","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-KJP1-20240911164600-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700","replies":[]}}-->

p.s. I've just noticed that this, Pembroke Dockyard has a section, Gallery of listed buildings on the site. This would probably be a better place for a Listed buildings section. KJP1 (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240912072300","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":12,"id":"c-KJP1-20240912072300-Tony_Holkham-20240911142700","replies":["c-KJP1-20240913072800-KJP1-20240912072300"]}}-->

Cadw at 40 - good to see our niche interest getting some wider coverage. KJP1 (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240913072800","author":"KJP1","type":"comment","level":13,"id":"c-KJP1-20240913072800-KJP1-20240912072300","replies":[]}}-->