Hi, it's Elysia--formerly with Wiki Education! Nice to see some familiar usernames here, and continued engagement with Wikipedia! I know a fair amount about WikiProjects and template syntax, so I moved your participants to the participants tab and transcluded that page to your main page. That way, participants sign up at the participants tab and it will automatically be reflected on the main page. Feel free to undo if not helpful :) and best of luck with your work! Enwebb (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-07-22T03:09:00.000Z","author":"Enwebb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Enwebb-2020-07-22T03:09:00.000Z-Hello!","replies":[]}}-->

Advancement of Sound Science Center has been added to this project. But the name is camouflage. It was not actually concerned about sound science, but about research results which are bad for the profits of its sponsors. I don't know if that qualifies it for this project... --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-08-07T07:10:00.000Z","author":"Hob Gadling","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hob_Gadling-2020-08-07T07:10:00.000Z-Advancement_of_Sound_Science_Center","replies":["c-Lightning1115-2020-08-15T04:24:00.000Z-Hob_Gadling-2020-08-07T07:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

After a second look at the page, you're right. I read through it quickly, but should have paid attention to the "industry-funded" portion of that article. Thanks for pointing that out! Lightning1115 (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-08-15T04:24:00.000Z","author":"Lightning1115","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Lightning1115-2020-08-15T04:24:00.000Z-Hob_Gadling-2020-08-07T07:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi all, Tom here - I am the main maintainer for peer review. I have updated your page "Wikipedia:WikiProject Science Policy/Peer Review" which previously copied instructions from WP:PR/Instructions. Those instructions are updated and changed over time, and likely to further change in the future - so if the instructions are copied it's likely to be outdated and inaccurate and require some maintenance. Instead, I've updated the page with a short description and encouraged editors to go to the main venue.

In the future (I'm a bit swamped at present) I will look into a way of tracking peer reviews by project, so that your project can also have a list of active / past peer reviews. Cheers --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-04T01:34:00.000Z","author":"Tom (LT)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tom_(LT)-2020-11-04T01:34:00.000Z-Peer_review_update","replies":[]}}-->

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-08-29T15:34:00.000Z","author":"Chidgk1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chidgk1-2021-08-29T15:34:00.000Z-Indirect_land_use_change_impacts_of_biofuels","replies":[]}}-->

I have nominated Hanford Site for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220925012500","author":"SandyGeorgia","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SandyGeorgia-20220925012500-Hanford_Site_Featured_article_review","replies":[]}}-->

An article that you have been involved in editing—Scientific consensus on climate change—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231108135200","author":"Chidgk1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chidgk1-20231108135200-Merger_discussion_for_Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change","replies":[]}}-->

There is an RFC requesting that editors choose between one of two draft sections on Food and Health in the article on Climate change. Please take part in the RFC. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240419042700","author":"Robert McClenon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Robert_McClenon-20240419042700-RFC_at_Climate_change","replies":[]}}-->

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241018013600","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20241018013600-Good_article_reassessment_for_Partial_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treaty","replies":[]}}-->