To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Lutheranism: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2020-03-23
I have a background in Lutheran church music and can start an article on it. I am looking for some feedback concerning the scope for the article. The article could focus on:
My idea right now is to start with a short history of Lutheran music. Beyond this, the issue is origin verses use. Commits, questions, suggestions? Weberc (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-03-29T16:17:00.000Z","author":"Weberc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Weberc-2012-03-29T16:17:00.000Z-Lutheran_Music","replies":[]}}-->
Here is the article as it is being constructed. Weberc (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-03-31T17:45:00.000Z","author":"Weberc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Weberc-2012-03-31T17:45:00.000Z-Lutheran_Music","replies":["c-Dulcimerist-2012-04-13T16:32:00.000Z-Weberc-2012-03-31T17:45:00.000Z","c-Dulcimerist-2012-04-14T07:20:00.000Z-Weberc-2012-03-31T17:45:00.000Z"]}}-->
Should the Christian symbolism article have a WikiProject Lutheranism tag on it? It seems somewhat relevant to our WikiProject, although it would likely be a low priority. I don't know how to go about adding the tag, and thought I should ask here first before adding the tag anyway. Thanks! --Dulcimerist (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-13T16:48:00.000Z","author":"Dulcimerist","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dulcimerist-2012-04-13T16:48:00.000Z-Christian_Symbolism_Article","replies":["c-Epiphyllumlover-2012-04-29T02:23:00.000Z-Dulcimerist-2012-04-13T16:48:00.000Z"]}}-->
that Michaelangelo shows up on the Category:People celebrated in the Lutheran liturgical calendar and I was wondering why that might be, or more to the point, if it is accurate. So I decided to pass this on to you to figure out. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-01-30T18:26:00.000Z","author":"Carptrash","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Carptrash-2013-01-30T18:26:00.000Z-I_just_noticed","replies":["c-Jfhutson-2013-02-04T15:35:00.000Z-Carptrash-2013-01-30T18:26:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hi everyone! You may want to have a look at this recently uploaded high resolution picture with portraits of 42 protestant reformers.Beat Estermann (talk) 22:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-17T22:55:00.000Z","author":"Beat Estermann","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Beat_Estermann-2013-03-17T22:55:00.000Z-Portraits_of_42_protestant_reformers","replies":[]}}-->
I am working on expanding the patristics aspect of this article but don't know enough to tackle the section on the "Lutheran-Reformed debate" which is unreferenced at the moment. Help would be appreciated. Jpacobb (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-27T21:21:00.000Z","author":"Jpacobb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jpacobb-2013-03-27T21:21:00.000Z-Communicatio_idiomatum:_Lutheran-Reformed_debate","replies":[]}}-->
Why Beerwolf, when the German is clearly Bearwolf?--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-05-04T01:05:00.000Z","author":"Dthomsen8","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dthomsen8-2013-05-04T01:05:00.000Z-Beerwolf","replies":[]}}-->
Hi. I'd like members to have a look at these edits and the accompanying discussion at Talk:Great Apostasy. It seems to me that they alter the Overview section in a POV way, giving undue weight to fringe Protestant views of the Catholic Church such as idol-worship, worship of Mary, and the hybrid "pagan Mother-Son worship". And not only that, but these fringe views are copied to the lead, totally skewing it. The citations are a collection of far-out Christian websites: http://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception_end-time_paganism_Catholic_sun-worship, https://www.sabbathtruth.com/sabbath-history/how-the-sabbath-was-changed, https://www.gotquestions.org/worship-saints-Mary.html, http://www.the-ten-commandments.org/catholic_church_idolatry.html, https://bible.org/question/it-okay-worship-statues-jesus, and a self-published 1914 pamphlet, The Practice of Idolatry, none of which come anywhere near satisfying WP:RS. Any input into the discussion is welcome. I'm copying this to other Christian WikiProjects. Scolaire (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-09-04T15:19:00.000Z","author":"Scolaire","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Scolaire-2017-09-04T15:19:00.000Z-Great_Apostasy","replies":[]}}-->
I'm not sure if this page is watched by many active Wikipedians, but I figured I'd try asking this here anyway on the hope that it is. I recently spent a fair amount of time expanding and sourcing the List of Lutheran denominations. Now that I've substantially finished my work on that list, I'd like to make pages for the many (over 100) Lutheran denominations that don't currently have Wikipedia pages. Unfortunately, many of these denominations are too small to deserve their own pages, possibly including some of the denominations that do currently have their own pages. I see two ways to proceed despite this problem. The first would be to list smaller denominations as a section on the page of the largest denomination in the country (most countries have a dominant Lutheran church and one or more much smaller Lutheran churches). So, for example, the "Evangelical Lutheran Church of Angola" would contain a short paragraph on the "Confessional Lutheran Church in Angola" within a section entitled "Other Lutheran churches in Angola" (or something along those lines).
The second solution I see would be to create a series of articles that focus on Lutheranism by country, with sections on each denomination within the article. Thus "Lutheranism in Angola" could contain a section on the "Evangelical Lutheran Church of Angola" and the "Confessional Lutheran Church in Angola." For countries with one major Lutheran church and several smaller churches, the section on the largest church would contain a brief summary of the church along with a link to its own separate article.
Either way, I would foresee this applying mostly (or only) in the case of African, Asian, and South American Lutheran churches—in other words, in areas where Lutherans have historically been thin on the ground.
If anyone has any thoughts on either of these ideas, or if you have another suggestion on how I might best proceed, please let me know. I'm open to any ideas on how to include information on all the redlinked articles within the List of Lutheran denominations. Bnng (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-04-07T23:29:00.000Z","author":"Bnng","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bnng-2018-04-07T23:29:00.000Z-Lutheran_denominations_reorganization_proposal","replies":["c-Indyguy-2018-04-08T01:48:00.000Z-Bnng-2018-04-07T23:29:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hello! On behalf of David Trone, I've proposed adding mention of his religion (Lutheranism), as well as mention of his family members' faith and which synagogue they attend, within the "Personal life" section of his Wikipedia article. I've proposed specific text here for one or more volunteer editors to review and implement appropriately. Adding Category:American Lutherans also seems appropriate.
I don't edit articles directly because of my conflict of interest, but I've provided sourcing and markup for consideration. Is a WikiProject Lutheranism member willing to review this request and update the article accordingly? Thanks in advance for any help. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-06-14T18:54:00.000Z","author":"Inkian Jason","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Inkian_Jason-2018-06-14T18:54:00.000Z-Request_to_add_sentence_and_category_to_David_Trone_article","replies":["c-Inkian_Jason-2018-06-28T15:48:00.000Z-Inkian_Jason-2018-06-14T18:54:00.000Z"]}}-->
Why is there no mention of child molestation in the southwest Washington (or others) OALC sect?75.100.226.132 (talk) 08:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-10-28T08:37:00.000Z","author":"75.100.226.132","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-75.100.226.132-2018-10-28T08:37:00.000Z-OALC_controversy_section","replies":[]}}-->
Lutheranism articles in "Draft." Currently:
Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-03-23T00:50:00.000Z","author":"Epiphyllumlover","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Epiphyllumlover-2020-03-23T00:50:00.000Z-articles_stuck_in_draft","replies":[]}}-->
Members of this Project may be interested in this discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-04-22T07:05:00.000Z","author":"Beyond My Ken","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Beyond_My_Ken-2021-04-22T07:05:00.000Z-Discussion","replies":[]}}-->
There is a new RfC open at Talk:Shroud of Turin#Request for comment on lead which is relevant to this project. Instaurare (talk) 06:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-04-25T06:40:00.000Z","author":"Instaurare","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Instaurare-2022-04-25T06:40:00.000Z-Request_for_comment_at_Shroud_of_Turin","replies":[]}}-->
An editor has opened a move discussion for the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod on its talk page to use either an emdash or an endash with spaces instead of an endash. Your comments are welcome. Indyguy (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230828202900","author":"Indyguy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Indyguy-20230828202900-Lutheran_Church\u2013Missouri_Synod_title_change","replies":["c-7&6=thirteen-20230828215300-Indyguy-20230828202900"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.119.29.204