This page is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this page, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20241119235100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Good_article_reassessment_for_Actinide-20241119235100","replies":["c-Z1720-20241119235100-Good_article_reassessment_for_Actinide"],"text":"Good article reassessment for Actinide","linkableTitle":"Good article reassessment for Actinide"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20241119235100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Good_article_reassessment_for_Actinide-20241119235100","replies":["c-Z1720-20241119235100-Good_article_reassessment_for_Actinide"],"text":"Good article reassessment for Actinide","linkableTitle":"Good article reassessment for Actinide"}-->
Actinide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119235100","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20241119235100-Good_article_reassessment_for_Actinide","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Raladic-20241126191700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Requested_move_at_Talk:Heavy_metal_element#Requested_move_19_November_2024-20241126191700","replies":["c-Raladic-20241126191700-Requested_move_at_Talk:Heavy_metal_element#Requested_move_19_November_2024"],"text":"Requested move at Talk:Heavy metal element#Requested move 19 November 2024","linkableTitle":"Requested move at Talk:Heavy metal element#Requested move 19 November 2024"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Raladic-20241126191700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Requested_move_at_Talk:Heavy_metal_element#Requested_move_19_November_2024-20241126191700","replies":["c-Raladic-20241126191700-Requested_move_at_Talk:Heavy_metal_element#Requested_move_19_November_2024"],"text":"Requested move at Talk:Heavy metal element#Requested move 19 November 2024","linkableTitle":"Requested move at Talk:Heavy metal element#Requested move 19 November 2024"}-->
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Heavy metal element#Requested move 19 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 19:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241126191700","author":"Raladic","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Raladic-20241126191700-Requested_move_at_Talk:Heavy_metal_element#Requested_move_19_November_2024","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20241130024000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Good_article_reassessment_for_Boron-20241130024000","replies":["c-Z1720-20241130024000-Good_article_reassessment_for_Boron"],"text":"Good article reassessment for Boron","linkableTitle":"Good article reassessment for Boron"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20241130024000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Good_article_reassessment_for_Boron-20241130024000","replies":["c-Z1720-20241130024000-Good_article_reassessment_for_Boron"],"text":"Good article reassessment for Boron","linkableTitle":"Good article reassessment for Boron"}-->
Boron has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241130024000","author":"Z1720","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Z1720-20241130024000-Good_article_reassessment_for_Boron","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Keresluna-20241216030200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Pulse_Radiolysis_Studies_for_Oxidation_states-20241216030200","replies":["c-Keresluna-20241216030200-Pulse_Radiolysis_Studies_for_Oxidation_states"],"text":"Pulse Radiolysis Studies for Oxidation states","linkableTitle":"Pulse Radiolysis Studies for Oxidation states"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Keresluna-20241216030200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Pulse_Radiolysis_Studies_for_Oxidation_states-20241216030200","replies":["c-Keresluna-20241216030200-Pulse_Radiolysis_Studies_for_Oxidation_states"],"text":"Pulse Radiolysis Studies for Oxidation states","linkableTitle":"Pulse Radiolysis Studies for Oxidation states"}-->
I was looking over some of the old references, and noticed some oxidation states have been stated by observation from pulse radiolysis studies, such as
Should these be included in the list of oxidation states? Keres🌕Lunaedits!03:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241216030200","author":"Keresluna","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Keresluna-20241216030200-Pulse_Radiolysis_Studies_for_Oxidation_states","replies":[],"displayName":"Keres\ud83c\udf15"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-United_entry_template_for_the_isotope_lists-20250107021600","replies":["c-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600-United_entry_template_for_the_isotope_lists"],"text":"United entry template for the isotope lists","linkableTitle":"United entry template for the isotope lists"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-United_entry_template_for_the_isotope_lists-20250107021600","replies":["c-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600-United_entry_template_for_the_isotope_lists"],"text":"United entry template for the isotope lists","linkableTitle":"United entry template for the isotope lists"}-->
Once I'm finished updating all of the isotope tables, I had the idea of creating a unified template to codify the table entries. It would uniformize the tables in a format that is easier to edit, and would allow extended capabilities such as sorting for the half-life table (using converted value in a common unit, as explained in this MOS talk). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:16, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250107021600","author":"LaundryPizza03","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600-United_entry_template_for_the_isotope_lists","replies":["c-Nucleus_hydro_elemon-20250110114900-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600"]}}-->
Sorting the half-lives is possible, but the list will be weird because the rows will be split. For example, a nuclide with 3 decay modes will be split into 3 rows after sorting the half-lives. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250110114900","author":"Nucleus hydro elemon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Nucleus_hydro_elemon-20250110114900-LaundryPizza03-20250107021600","replies":["c-Preimage-20250110131800-Nucleus_hydro_elemon-20250110114900"]}}-->
Should be OK: for nuclides with multiple decay modes, each decay mode is allocated the nuclide's half-life, rather than the decay mode's partial half-life. E.g. see Isotopes of helium. Preimage (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20250110131800","author":"Preimage","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Preimage-20250110131800-Nucleus_hydro_elemon-20250110114900","replies":[]}}-->