Wikipedia talk:Requested articles


Not sure which category

I am not sure which category to put this in, but I would like to see an article about the concept of Legacy gifts. That is to say when someone wills money to a non-profit organization. I wanted to read more about them and was surprised no such article existed. It seems like a concept that people would have written lots on, so I suspect it is wp:notable. ~2026-16297-55 (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requesting creation of a article titled “2026 May Day protests and strikes”

Where is the "on-demand writing service" then?

If neither AFC nor RA is the "on-demand writing service", where is it then? RaschenTechner (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

There isn't one. Wikipedia is maintained by volunteers; none of whom wish to write articles on an "on demand" basis, especially when many suggestions just would not be viable per WP:N, WP:NOT and the like. You, however, can write whatever article you wish, within the guidelines and policies. Leaf.Sheap ⇖ /.°°.\ ⇗ (They•Them) 16:49, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
But what if someone isn't good at writing articles but still wants to have an article within guidelines and policies published? Why is there no such place for someone to propose writing an article and the volunteers write an article for them? RaschenTechner (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
You could try making such a place yourself, but it's unlikely to have much success. If the subject is not even mentioned anywhere in the Encyclopedia, persuading someone to write a whole article is unlikely. Of course, you could insert a mention into a relevant existing article, which might persuade a reader that your article idea is a good one. Maybe. Jim.henderson (talk) 09:26, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request for article

If any one can write me a article please reply me i can and i will contact Jews News (Harvard) (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nobody is going to 'write an article for you' unless the subject meets our notability criteria, as demonstrated through significant coverage in published reliable sources independent of the subject. If the subject in the article is the same as the individual currently described in your sandbox, [1] you aren't going to get an article, because the individual clearly isn't notable.
If anyone offers to write an article for you for payment, ignore them, as such offers are invariably scams. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:44, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2026

I would like to request the creation of a new Wikipedia article about Ian Gentil, a professional surfer from Maui, Hawaii. Proposed title: Ian Gentil Subject: Ian Gentil is a professional surfer from Maui, Hawaii. He qualified for the 2023 WSL Championship Tour (the highest level where the best surfers in the world compete) after a strong 2022 season. He was named the 2023 WSL Men's Rookie of the Year. His best Championship Tour results include 3rd place at the 2023 Surf City El Salvador Pro, 5th place at the 2023 J-Bay Open, and 3rd place at the 2024 Lexus Pipe Pro. Sources:

Main WSL Athlete Profile: https://www.worldsurfleague.com/athletes/2618/ian-gentil 2023 Rookie of the Year: https://www.worldsurfleague.com/posts/522665/caitlin-simmers-and-ian-gentil-honored-as-2023-rookies-of-the-year 2023 World Surf League: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_World_Surf_League 2024 World Surf League: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_World_Surf_League

Notable media coverage includes features in Surfer Magazine and multiple viral WSL posts highlighting his performances. He meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for athletes through his Championship Tour results and media coverage. Thank you. IanGentil (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:Requested articles. If you want to request an article, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested_articles meamemg (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requesting articles for people with significant media coverage ( I think ) and have contributed to the society

Alisson wood: Author of Being Lolita https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/08/04/dissecting-pain-an-interview-with-alisson-wood/ and Dr. Alison Wood Brooks Harvard Business School, widely recognized for her expertise on the science of human conversation. [1] ( I'm shocked the latter doesn't have a wikipedia page yet ) and I think she has sufficient independent media coverage to have one. Can any enthusiasts help to bridge the knowledge gap in wikipedia, especially for women since history has significantly less coverage of accomplished women and I posit that Wikipedia inherited this aspect, resulting in a gender gap between coverage of accomplished women and men on the wikipedia page. I would love to do so but I don't have sufficient time as of now. Philolover (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Writing a new article takes more effort than most other tasks, and is especially difficult for a BLP biography of the living. Easier usually to beef up the subject's Wikidata item, and to mention her in existing articles for which she provides a reference or is otherwise important. For example, I was reluctant to write a bio of Alice Bowman but instead just mentioned her name in a paragraph about New Horizons. That was enough to persuade a few other editors to do the rest of the work for me. This method of course doesn't much apply to a subject who is not relevant to matters already discussed in Wikipedia. Jim.henderson (talk) 07:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay I get what you mean. When I have the time or when I wanna destress, I'll try to find related articles and mention her. I think it's much more easier to do it for Dr. Alison Wood Brooks. However, if anyone here are enthusiastic and wish to write new articles on them, please help to do so! Philolover (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.