encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcuts WP:TRUTHWP:TRUTH WP:NOTTRUTHWP:NOTTRUTH WP:VNTWP:VNT...

the Event Channel" - Not about inVNT - some mentions and quotes. "inVNT's Event at its New Office" - Is about inVNT and the office warming party they...

people here do find VNT a better use of what is and will continue to be a popular shorthand. In particular, the high value of VNT is something many editors...

The essay at WP:VNT lists three shortcuts at the top: TRUTH, NOTTRUTH, and VNT. A link to capitalized WP:TRUTH does indeed go to VNT. But a link to Truth...

(UTC) Comment : There is also a AfD on his company inVNT Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InVNT. Codf1977 (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete doesn't...

and also by their stance on VNT, as there was a very clear divide between "pro-VNT" and "anti-VNT" views. Significant pro-VNT views The phrase "verifiability...

inaccuracies just because they are 'well sourced'.: Quite the opposite, see WP:VNT --Cyclopiatalk 17:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete:total lack of clarity as...

WP:NSPORT, regardless of whether league actually is fully-pro or not, per WP:VNT. Eleven time in the last month, there were afd's on footballers with appearances...

online with Evolution Day from 2005 or before; that should establish WP:VNT -- Limulus (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) The page mentioning the Geek...

doesn't change the fact that the claim to notability remains unsourced per WP:VNT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Keep- as far as I know,...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:VNT. All above arguments fall apart if no sources support either the existence...

is actually effectively claiming this of the sources, for which I cite WP:VNT. Equally, even if the word 'curry' originated as a British mishearing/misinterpretation...

' which means that citations, even wrong citations, trump all else." WP:VNT is an essay, not a policy, and Wikipedia policy does not require editors...

documented in at least one reliable source before updating an article, per WP:VNT.) Why does Wikipedia update the name used in a trans person's article even...

games. shoy (reactions) 18:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Even in the face of VNT, I think it's disingenuous to present all instances of a term that is KNOWN...

Money Dark Mode/night reading mode request Deprecated sources Truth and VNT links Levan Songulashvili How can I change the title of an entry? recovery...

understanding VnT, makes me wonder whether this view can be construed as a roundabout way of saying "get rid of VnT". After all, part of the purpose of VnT is to...

standards of journalism here as you would expect from CNN or The Times. See WP:VNT. While I agree with your evaluation of these sites, we have to make do with...

WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:RS, etc. and is (indirectly) a re-hash of the WP:VNT argument. In this case, a pro-academia bias is no violation of WP:NPOV, but...

đoàn Đại Việt (diff - DELETED) - Link: Http://tapdoandaiviet.com.vn/vnt (R/Xmeta/L) 2015-10-14 03:52:52 (UTC): w:vi:User:Jommy93 (t - c; 4) to w:vi:Công...

little based on merits" this is your opinion, not what the sources say WP:VNT. Since Wikipedia is based on what the sources say, your opinion about how...

July 2018 (UTC) Take a look at the policy WP:V and the related essay WP:VNT "Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor...

made few or no other edits outside this topic. I encourage you you read WP:VNT. "Right" or "correct" is not the standard for inclusion on Wikipedia. Notability...

I wrote an article on the live event company inVNT, and it was marked for speedy deletion. I added more references and information to make it a more notable...

' which means that citations, even wrong citations, trump all else." WP:VNT is an essay, not a policy, and Wikipedia policy does not require editors...

mentioned being factually inaccurate, but perfectly allowed due to the WP:VNT mentality. Doesn’t fail notability. In fact, it stays perfectly in line with...

a coach telling their sports team to score more points - sure, but how? VNT makes people uncomfortable precisely because it's honest and accurate about...

however, the content is unsourced, so it's not clear whether it's a kind of WP:VNT, WP:OR, or WP:SYN. Moreover, the painting is actually being used in a later...

in the Wikipedia:Verifiability MedCab case. It will be used to create the VnT compromise draft, for presentation in a community-wide RfC. This draft will...

opponents of VnT have not even identified any actually problem with the wording. I have been asking for months - literally months - for VnT opponents to...

blocked editor, and this is a rather uninspiring and not new complaint about VNT (which is still far closer to matching how Wikipedia actually works). SnowFire...

important to whether or not the mentioned topic is notable. Please see WP:VNT. Jclemens (talk) 01:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Keep — a notable organization...

biography article.Mddkpp (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Remember WP:VNT, the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not...

process. Some of those points that may need further discussion include whether VnT should be called "historical" or a "slogan", used as a parenthetical in the...

bear with me and try to understand the points I'm hoping to make. First, WP:VNT ("verifiability, not truth") is widely misunderstood. It doesn't mean "we...

the Event Channel" - Not about inVNT - some mentions and quotes. "inVNT's Event at its New Office" - Is about inVNT and the office warming party they...

VNB VNC VND VNE VNF VNG VNH VNI VNJ VNK VNL VNM VNN VNO VNP VNQ VNR VNS VNT VNU VNV VNW VNX VNY VNZ VOA VOB VOC VOD VOE VOF VOG VOH VOI VOJ VOK VOL VOM...

the Wikipedia:Verifiability MedCab case. It will be used to create the non-VnT compromise draft, for presentation in a community-wide RfC. This draft will...

continually proclaims his personal knowledge as correct. Thus there are WP:VNT issues as well. Lastly, he does not understand WP:BRD.VictoriaGraysonTalk...

the pre-existing cites and just added your own main events. WP:OR and WP:VNT patently failed. Phieuxghazzieh (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC) Big fan...

both teams collaborating to make just this happen). I informed him of WP:VNT—that we defer to what's reported in reliable sources, rather than "the truth"...

or because they wish to pretend that VNT is a mainstream view, then my response will be to repeatedly remove VNT from the policy and encourage others...

other sources rather supports their validity on the point. Please see WP:VNT. I am sorry that Paine Ellsworth got your hopes up by initially doing as...

numerous scholars have asserted this. I sense a distinct inability to grasp WP:VNT. He still pushes his own theory of the Somló suicide, and doesn't seem to...

persistence and depth of coverage required to pass WP:N. Incidentally, per WP:VNT, this is verging, I think on a WP:HOAX; at least, WP:A11 ('Obviously made...

know that “Verifiability not truth”…. But readers, just rethink about this VNT line for 2 minutes. I am doing a history degree and I have lost all faith...

within policy guidelines. Oldtaxguy (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC) WP:VNT. However, a simple calculation from what is already reported in the sources...

meaning black", which is correct, but misses out steps. This leads to the WP:VNT conflict, which is difficult to resolve without maximum goodwill on all sides...

criterion 3(a). —Vensatry (ping) 18:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Then what about WP:VNT? Sriram, that's an essay and cannot be co-related with WP:FL?. That being...

WHO, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, etc databases. Please see WP:VNT - the guideline I followed. ApostleVonColorado (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2012...

trivially demonstrated to be a lie. I'm sure you're about to point to WP:VNT - let me quickly rebut that while it may not be required that something be...

John Carter would finally learn to edit in accordance with WP:V (and WP:VNT) and fix the problem themselves. For all I know, they could be right about...

rest: Beaconmike, it looks like you might want to read WP:OR, WP:OWN, WP:VNT, WP:THETRUTH and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS... - The Bushranger One ping only 03:57...

better than I, so I'll just repeat suggestions to read, and understand, WP:VNT, WP:NPOV, WP:PRIMARY, and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. - The Bushranger One ping...

was using conspiracy theory as an example of some of the misunderstanding VnT gets User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#When_Verifiability_becomes_Truth_...

Asami (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)) Please see WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:VNT. Also please see WP:THETRUTH. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:34, 7 October...

living person ...although WP:OR is, as noted, also relevant, as may be WP:VNT. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC) Protected and...

this user has been repeatedly breaching WP:OR (and, of course, Wikipedia:VNT) on various articles. The first two cases are closed (or however you call...

response, a logic that I find troubling since as an asumption it violates WP:VNT, WP:COP, among other well established Wikipedia guidlines. Inter&anthro (talk)...

KeithCu has a long way to go regarding following WP:V in the vein of WP:VNT, as well as WP:RS. If you will read the following quotes: starship.paint...

to relate to the old "verification not truth" slogan. (See the essay WP:VNT.) Our task is to present verified information. If Gderrin or anyone else...

WP:OR, and WP:SECONDARY sourcing. They completely reject the concept of WP:VNT — arguing instead for their own analysis of WP:PRIMARY sources via endless...

about my high school, but I don't add them to the article because of WP:VNT. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC) While this discussion takes...

you do. Even if you are correct, we still must follow what sources say (WP:VNT). Even if the depository is wrong, we still need to report what the depository...

vnb vnc vnd vne vnf vng vnh vni vnj vnk vnl vnm vnn vno vnp vnq vnr vns vnt vnu vnv vnw vnx vny vnz voa vob voc vod voe vof vog voh voi voj vok vol vom...

"largest town" issue convincing. To me this seems similar to the example in WP:VNT#"If it's written in a book, it must be true!" of using a travel guide that...

comfortable route. North8000 (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Why has VnT not been returned to the lead as mandated by the closing admins' ruling that...

criterion 3(a). —Vensatry (ping) 18:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Then what about WP:VNT? Sriram, that's an essay and cannot be co-related with WP:FL?. That being...

18:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Hello IP editorWalter.e.steele. Please read WP:VNT, which explains that Wikipedia is based on what reliable, published, independent...

that hoax until now. Pretty funny actually. Highlights the problem with WP:vnt doesn't it? Couple guys walk out of Twitter with cardboard boxes and somebody...

history | links | watch | logs) (diff  top?) - Link: front.moveon.org/about/#.VNT-k8Yhwt8 (R/Xmeta/L) 2015-02-20 00:07:52 (UTC): User Royalmate1 t • c • dc •...

notability. Wikipedia doesn't care if you don't trust the information. See WP:VNT. The authenticity of sources can always be debated in talk, but there is...

(WP:ADVOCACY). The truth doesn't matter, only the verifiability does (WP:VNT); and it is verifiable that there is this phenomenon many people are calling...

of "verifiability, not truth" or VNT -- I can't resist abbreviating "verifiable but inaccurate" to VBI. Just like VNT, VBI is punchy, yes, but also open...

behaviour. The use of signatures should be governed by our usual policies of WP:VNT and WP:RS; if the sig is covered in sources, there's something that makes...

WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:RS, etc. and is (indirectly) a re-hash of the WP:VNT argument. --Surturz (talk) 02:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC) It already exists,...

some of the editors know The Truth is contrary to policy, though. See WP:VNT. -Thibbs (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC) To answer your points: This...

says to have any credibility and to adhere to WP principles. Correct WP:VNT is to just follow the cites and tell what everyone says on a topic in WP:NPOV...

page, therefore, disambiguates information that is likely false. Per WP:VNT, it is ok to mark the width as 10 miles in absence of a reliable source claiming...

article. Just a point of clarification: This is a new essay, not the older WP:VNT page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC) Can we discuss the...

the source stops being reliable, period. The whole rationale behind WP:VNT is that Wikipedia articles cannot assert truth in the absense of verifiability;...

accidentally misrepresenting (or rather, simply leaving out) sources. I believe in "VnT", but not when it comes to evaluating an editor's motives and seriousness...

some POV here). No RfC needed. (Lest my view sound strange, the whole WP:VNT RfC years who was basically about rewording the lead sentence to avoid exactly...

(UTC) Comment : There is also a AfD on his company inVNT Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InVNT. Codf1977 (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete doesn't...

Cullather search re-inserted by a second sock after deletion. Related to InVNT. Salted. AfD Security Innovation search Security Innovations search Shayan...

games. shoy (reactions) 18:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Even in the face of VNT, I think it's disingenuous to present all instances of a term that is KNOWN...

made few or no other edits outside this topic. I encourage you you read WP:VNT. "Right" or "correct" is not the standard for inclusion on Wikipedia. Notability...

Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth already has an intuitive shortcut at WP:VNT. See a discussion about WP:NC at Wikipedia talk:Article titles/Archive 33...

any such content to a Wikipedia article, please take a look at WP:RGW, WP:VNT and WP:UNDUE. In addition, might want to look at WP:BLPSOURCES (if the persons...

this and realising I've learned nothing. I might as well add I've read WP:VNT and wholeheartedly agree with it but nevertheless think the illustrated case...

biography article.Mddkpp (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Remember WP:VNT, the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not...

2332nd in pages created.) StAnselm (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC) WP:VNT. sst✈ 09:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC) So? That doesn't answer my question at all...

persistence and depth of coverage required to pass WP:N. Incidentally, per WP:VNT, this is verging, I think on a WP:HOAX; at least, WP:A11 ('Obviously made...

cannot be verified and should not be included. I'm aware of WP:RS and WP:VNT I'm wondering if there are other relevant policies in this area since I expect...

you're probably going to have a bit of hard time per WP:NOR,WP:PRIMARY and WP:VNT. Finally, even if the "real" cause of a "disaster" was subsequently reported...

inaccuracies just because they are 'well sourced'.: Quite the opposite, see WP:VNT --Cyclopiatalk 17:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Delete:total lack of clarity as...

Soldier of Fortune (magazine) Knitsey (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC) WP:VNT. Information published in reliable sources that is notable and confirmed...

WHO, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, etc databases. Please see WP:VNT - the guideline I followed. ApostleVonColorado (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2012...

standards of journalism here as you would expect from CNN or The Times. See WP:VNT. While I agree with your evaluation of these sites, we have to make do with...

WP:NSPORT, regardless of whether league actually is fully-pro or not, per WP:VNT. Eleven time in the last month, there were afd's on footballers with appearances...

(WP:ADVOCACY). The truth doesn't matter, only the verifiability does (WP:VNT); and it is verifiable that there is this phenomenon many people are calling...

Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:VNT. All above arguments fall apart if no sources support either the existence...

VNB VNC VND VNE VNF VNG VNH VNI VNJ VNK VNL VNM VNN VNO VNP VNQ VNR VNS VNT VNU VNV VNW VNX VNY VNZ VOA VOB VOC VOD VOE VOF VOG VOH VOI VOJ VOK VOL VOM...

multiple published sources from major publishing houses. I'd point you to WP:VNT. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC) By using your...

the validity of the conspiracy theories with their notability—a classic WP:VNT fallacy. The user's opening statement was how "several [references] are not...

July 2018 (UTC) Take a look at the policy WP:V and the related essay WP:VNT "Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor...

online with Evolution Day from 2005 or before; that should establish WP:VNT -- Limulus (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) The page mentioning the Geek...

little based on merits" this is your opinion, not what the sources say WP:VNT. Since Wikipedia is based on what the sources say, your opinion about how...

important to whether or not the mentioned topic is notable. Please see WP:VNT. Jclemens (talk) 01:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Keep — a notable organization...

(edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) InVNT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

and representative survey of the relevant literature", and even perhaps WP:VNT. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC) I understand; it’s just...

doesn't change the fact that the claim to notability remains unsourced per WP:VNT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Keep- as far as I know,...

notability. Wikipedia doesn't care if you don't trust the information. See WP:VNT. The authenticity of sources can always be debated in talk, but there is...

Robert Chambers) and only one "began after her lifetime", we're into WP:VNT territory. It's not down to us to decide what's true, it's to report what...

written text from two reliable sources so freely. This is exactly what WP:VNT is all about. Actually, I don't really think there's much of a problem here...

to load), but even if he did specify USD, then don't we still have a WP:VNT issue where we know based on a primary source that the secondary source means...

your reasoning. You're complicating something that should be simple. WP:VNT applies.--Jetstreamer Talk 14:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC) Very few things...

multiple published sources from major publishing houses. I'd point you to WP:VNT. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC) By using your...

some POV here). No RfC needed. (Lest my view sound strange, the whole WP:VNT RfC years who was basically about rewording the lead sentence to avoid exactly...

says otherwise. It's true that he didn't impose his desired outcome in the VNT debate, yet, but that's really a minor wording issue compared to this, and...

your views on BLP that seem to indicate you don't care about WP:V and WP:VNT/WP:TRUTH. I have seen much good writing and other associated work, but your...

blog. Someone needs to save Wikipedia from itself if that's truly what WP:VNT and WP:REF means. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC) So Winkelvi's...

Image:1991Superjet.jpg Image:Sony DSLR-A100.jpg Image:1476273394084605.jpg Image:Audi VNT turbo.jpg Image:Klimov RD-33.jpg Image:GP7000 cutaway.jpg Image:Epson R-D1...

2332nd in pages created.) StAnselm (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC) WP:VNT. sst✈ 09:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC) So? That doesn't answer my question at all...

-a-youngster-the-story-of-rj-trickshot/?fbclid=IwAR2Q8hWgKeLC8jOHhMkSmRYyVntB801PX072Mz0m0yTySD_ln0b9K_8JdPU (R/Xmeta/L) 2021-09-30 18:05:49 (UTC): d:User:Mobin089...

incredibly poor sourcing. (Whether Gamers are or are not misogynistic is a WP:VNT discussion). While we may not see a lot of difference between "widespread...

20:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:VNT, and many others. fredgandt 20:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC) (edit conflict)...

the only RS is a single brief newswire report will always be dubious. WP:VNT and all. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 18:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC) I mean, he's been...

that humanity could agree upon what is true is illusion. That is what WP:VNT is about. I think a minimal sense of reality should compel anthroposophists...

cannot be verified and should not be included. I'm aware of WP:RS and WP:VNT I'm wondering if there are other relevant policies in this area since I expect...

pill) or knowing the truth (the red pill). I'm particularly fond of the WP:VNT link for red pill. I had considered using WP:RFA for how deep the rabbit...

reason I think sourced critical commentary is important has to do with WP:VNT and WP:OR. Any unsourced claims or interpretations might be challenged or...

political opponents) I believe this to be a good faith misunderstanding of WP:VNT on the part of the IP editor, especially based upon his/her comments on my...

newly-created article on that person. XOR'easter (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC) WP:VNT? I don't follow Twitter stuff and that wouldn't be reliable either, and especially...

opposing WEIGHT plus requires OR for setting what is “legitimate”. The WP:VNT seems clearly siding with use what is COMMON. The NPOV guidance to portray...

your source for stating Rummel's numbers are too low? bearing in mind WP:VNT? The low end of Benz's research confirms his estimate. And why do we use...

but very little in the way of concrete support from the cited sources. WP:VNT reminds us that even if you believe strongly that a statement is true, it...

tkUPpd-DG87f36DDlPeGXsJOV6lJk_1a5GF047-dMga6fu-9jqsyqLK3PBicg4ixAqD9lExRwVnt-T6NXjhfCyCwIHeRP-kdbxlYx-ob48sIe_1wq6G9dHrM7llGNT_1r9aBJrD9dzPnK6nh-ne7r...

on images should be made on a case-by-case basis. Also, please note the VNT policy, which states that information cited to Wikipedia only needs to be...

On Wikipedia, we base our content on verifiability, not truth -- see WP:VNT. And that means it IS okay if it links to reliable sources. Now granted,...

all variables that I deemed necessary to get to the answer. Also, see WP:VNT. We are not here to determine truth, but we are here to determine reliability...

restore as appropriate. (Non-administrator comment) User has also recreated InVNT, which I just marked for G4. The previous creator (not sure if this is the...

it. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Leaning Oppose. WP:VNT has tainted this event and it's corresponding article, and highlighting it...

Collect" WP:VNT, Association fallacy. Clivel 0 (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC) WP:NPOV, WP:OR, Association fallacy, ad hominem, WP:VNT Law of holes...

policies state that we should interpret topics or use sources, simple. Read WP:VNT, if we had a emperor and all the most reliable sources stated that he had...

conversation I gave. I explain that we're not here to argue about the evidence (WP:VNT), Gh26 responds with a personal attack calling me a hypocrite for not arguing...

VNB VNC VND VNE VNF VNG VNH VNI VNJ VNK VNL VNM VNN VNO VNP VNQ VNR VNS VNT VNU VNV VNW VNX VNY VNZ VOA VOB VOC VOD VOE VOF VOG VOH VOI VOJ VOK VOL VOM...

reliably report India claiming 100's and Pakistan claiming 0. No issue here. WP:VNT applies --LaserLegs (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC) Yeah, but just repeating...

the final result, and I think that was definitely the case with the big VNT discussion. In that discussion there was basically one proposal, and two...

we know to be false (irrespective of the widespread misunderstanding of VnT), and 2. anthropologists are neither theologians nor philosophers and thus...

Z1720 (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC) As one of the biggest fans of WP:VNT around, I do think that the rules slightly change for featured status. We...

should be a notable fringe group, and that we're right to start with WP:VNT. The problem is if critical coverage of said fringe is lacking, for whatever...

Robert Chambers) and only one "began after her lifetime", we're into WP:VNT territory. It's not down to us to decide what's true, it's to report what...

whether the travel was to or from Ohio. Our goal is not to be correct (c.f. WP:VNT), but to educate people. We don't educate people by making it harder to find...

12 August 2012 (UTC) This is going to be one of those situations where VnT will cause us trouble. I think we'd really want to invoke a criterion of...

Spade Kitty Records - (3316) - delete - closed 03:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC) InVNT - (5241) - delete - closed 03:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC) Metus Technology - (3163)...

help? I feel like I'm getting repeatedly slapped down with a policy (WP:VNT) that was removed 5 years ago. Can you give me some clarity on whether WP:V...

it's about verifiability, not truth; they need to educate themselves on WP:VNT. Other editors need to understand that even if content is reliably sourced...

Requested Articles page for Businesses and organizations a few months ago for inVNT, but haven't seen any movement or received any feedback from the editorial...

written text from two reliable sources so freely. This is exactly what WP:VNT is all about. Actually, I don't really think there's much of a problem here...

vnb vnc vnd vne vnf vng vnh vni vnj vnk vnl vnm vnn vno vnp vnq vnr vns vnt vnu vnv vnw vnx vny vnz voa vob voc vod voe vof vog voh voi voj vok vol vom...

refusing to be a party to the discussion. I'm happy you're finally reading WP:VNT, but I also cited WP:OR, which should be avoided, and WP:V, which should...

suggest going off what Marshall et al. says over other sources. I think WP:VNT is a good thing to consider here, although I understand if you want me to...

Removing pop from and adding R&B to various articles in violation of WP:VNT, see [26], [27], and [28]. If a CU could check for sleepers, that would be...

decide on the winner? That's what the sources say so I'm keeping it per WP:VNT. I think it's probably insinuating they just let people enter until they...

through, I had to put up with some serious calls for a violation of WP:OR, WP:VNT, among others. There's nothing more annoying than to have to deal the whole...

(U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Vntgame <-> Vnt game (Vnt game - diff - COIBot UserReport) 02:37:22, Mon Aug 06, 2007 - user:Roxqualls...

everything at the article with the subtlety of a 14 ton elephant". Indeed, WP:VNT says "The phrase "the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth"...

verifiability, not truth." See the essay, WP:Verifiability, not truth.] WP:VNT : The phrase "the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth" meant...

and representative survey of the relevant literature", and even perhaps WP:VNT. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC) I understand; it’s just...

million number is "true", only a number that needs to be mentioned (see WP:VNT) - what I have been saying all along is that the two million figure, stated...

according to you it's not being used. According to me, it is being used. WP:VNT refers to this exactly with the hypno-toad example. We disagree = the opinable...

truth can work fine under both a VNT and a NOTFALSE system, but the fringe theorists tend to be deterred better by VNT and encouraged by something like...

four/five maximum per insemination one. I'm going to air on the side of WP:VNT here and trust the expert instead of trying to inject my own commentary in...

mentioned being factually inaccurate, but perfectly allowed due to the WP:VNT mentality. Doesn’t fail notability. In fact, it stays perfectly in line with...

to provide reliable, verifiable, independent sources for your changes. WP:VNT may help you. Cabayi (talk) 10:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Per Wikipedia:Administrators'...

page, therefore, disambiguates information that is likely false. Per WP:VNT, it is ok to mark the width as 10 miles in absence of a reliable source claiming...

enthusiasts. I don’t necessarily disbelieve them; rather it may be a case of WP:VNT. In [29] we read: … a team of independent surveyors who have been responsible...

[[WP:CSD#F9|F9]]: Unambiguous [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright violation]] 325 InNVT InVNT_logo_jpeg.jpg 20130910000121 File deleted: [[WP:CSD#F5|F5]]: Unused non-free...

warning: [232] 11:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC) "/* August 2024 */ WP:THETRUTH, WP:VNT" 03:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC) "Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion...

is actually effectively claiming this of the sources, for which I cite WP:VNT. Equally, even if the word 'curry' originated as a British mishearing/misinterpretation...

absurd. jp×g🗯️ 01:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC) This. While there is rightly a WP:VNT culture at Wikipedia it doesn't mean sources are sanctified to the extent...

seeking is not the ultimate goal, but simply regurgitating sources" See WP:VNT. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC) And WP:KNOW, while you're...

film/pop culture genre. This includes sourcing them for exclusives/"scoops". WP:VNT would apply in those cases. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)...

decide on the winner? That's what the sources say so I'm keeping it per WP:VNT. I think it's probably insinuating they just let people enter until they...

the only RS is a single brief newswire report will always be dubious. WP:VNT and all. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 18:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC) I mean, he's been...

scientific journal about physics. jps (talk) 02:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC) See WP:VNT. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC) C'mon. WP:TRUTHMATTERS...

your reasoning. You're complicating something that should be simple. WP:VNT applies.--Jetstreamer Talk 14:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC) Very few things...

torch. MarkWHowe (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC) @MarkWHowe: See WP:VNT and WP:EXPERT for more details, but Wikipedia articles aren't peered reviewed...

Wikipedia article clearly supports the statement, so appears to be a WP:VNT case where a generally reliable source contains an error. 2. "Alaskan Nets"...

[42]. That said, OP seems to have a thing for WP:THETRUTH as opposed to WP:VNT, judging by their edit summaries. I have fully protected Persian Gulf for...

effort there to educate this user on the basic principles of WP:NOR and WP:VNT, with nothing much but WP:IDHT in response--although it is difficult to determine...

Wikipedia article clearly supports the statement, so appears to be a WP:VNT case where a generally reliable source contains an error. 2. "Alaskan Nets"...

Average Editor (talk) 04:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC) You should take a look at WP:VNT, WP:True and WP:RS before making these claims. MiasmaEternal☎ 06:46, 30 March...

relationships tend to be the type of thing the community regards through a WP:VNT lens, rather than adopting firm prescriptive and proscriptive rules about...

for suppressing information. HopDavid (talk) 03:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC) WP:VNT, and blogs are generally not considered WP:RS for that. Stefen Towers among...

suggest going off what Marshall et al. says over other sources. I think WP:VNT is a good thing to consider here, although I understand if you want me to...

need to cite and asking the editor to read WP:RS, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and WP:VNT. All have fallen on deaf ears, the editor does not reply and just carries...

possibly put it anymore succinctly than you have, KTC. What ever happened to WP:VNT? Cheerio, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 12:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC) Comment: So,...

Z1720 (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC) As one of the biggest fans of WP:VNT around, I do think that the rules slightly change for featured status. We...

four/five maximum per insemination one. I'm going to air on the side of WP:VNT here and trust the expert instead of trying to inject my own commentary in...