Search Results: Wikipedia:USERESSAY


Wikipedia:Essays
Rabu, 2026-03-04 10:45:48

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies#Recommended structure). Shortcut WP:USERESSAYWP:USERESSAY According to Wikipedia policy, "Essays that the author does not want others...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zordrac/helping
Jumat, 2023-02-17 21:19:25

would write a short useressay on why he is doing this, and to blank any similar pages with an edit summary link to his useressay, and for him to not make...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sometimes patience is better
Rabu, 2025-06-25 02:58:42

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC) Userfy. A reasonable useressay. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:47, 17 June 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editorials
Jumat, 2019-03-29 04:05:21

judge that User:WhatamIdoing does not consider herself an author. As a useressay, there is no reason to delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:52, 20 March 2019...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:TooMuchFuckingDetail
Rabu, 2022-02-23 13:54:36

essay. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 09:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Userfy - per WP:USERESSAY and per Godsy's comments. —PaleoNeonate – 10:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Userfy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wer900/There is a cabal
Rabu, 2022-02-23 14:14:39

8 November 2017 (UTC) User:Wer900/There_is_a_cabal: A perfectly fine useressay. Wikipedia:Words_of_wisdom#On_Wikipedia_and_the_Cabal is a different essay...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (families)
Jumat, 2022-02-25 23:02:59

Disputed single-author essays should be userfied. Convert either to essay or useressay. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Other than a general...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elvenscout742/Jeffrey Woodward critique
Rabu, 2022-04-13 21:59:48

think it is an article. If someone wants to add one of the userspace or useressay tags, they should feel free to do so. I have held my tongue for quite...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Similar treatment is okay
Rabu, 2022-02-23 13:55:32

"Worked on"!? This is an essay, which the nominator and I posit is a WP:USERESSAY hanging out in WP: space. By definition, there is no development goal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Assume clue
Minggu, 2022-02-27 13:10:07

Oppose deletion, but userfy. Easily within well accepted norms for a useressay. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC) Delete, or userfy if anyone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Gun use
Rabu, 2022-02-23 14:00:56

below. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Upon reviewing WP:USERESSAY, I now believe this should be moved back into user space. My previous...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Codename Lisa/Being Evil 101
Minggu, 2022-02-27 18:18:09

10:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC) Keep per SmokeyJoe, with a smidgin of WP:USERESSAY, WP:UP#OWN, WP:UPYES, &Co. — fortunavelut lunaRarely receiving (many)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Queen Elizabeth slipped majestically into the water
Jumat, 2024-11-08 18:18:43

(talk) 00:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC) I'd be open to userfying this per WP:USERESSAY. It's almost entirely the work of one user, and the way it gets its views...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Salami tactics
Rabu, 2022-02-23 13:55:46

out by Beeblebrox, there is consensus that the page complies with WP:USERESSAY and enough people on both the "keep" and "delete" side of the argument...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Specialized-style fallacy
Rabu, 2019-01-16 20:05:43

WP:ESSAY, "Essays may be moved into userspace as user essays (see WP:USERESSAY), or even deleted, if they are found to be problematic." Calidum 01:36...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:IP vandalism
Selasa, 2022-11-29 02:41:35

is related to the encyclopedia and it is in userspace according to WP:USERESSAY and WP:ESSAYS. The essay in question is technically related to Wikipedia...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gryllida/BiographyNotability
Rabu, 2022-02-23 15:03:48

7 March 2018 (UTC) Gryllida, you have my blessing to {{db-u1}} your useressay, especially if you agree with TonyBallioni that it is not conveying the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a spelling checker
Rabu, 2021-02-03 20:58:53

deleting. At worst, this could be userfied noting that we do not delete useressays of blokced editors. He is probably past his urge of legal threats and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AeronPeryton/Articles/Template:DanceDanceRevolution music
Sabtu, 2022-02-26 15:06:46

given the privilege of control of the content. This applies definitely to useressays. It applies to notes, which I think this should be considered as. It would...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Not everything Hitler does deserves an article
Sabtu, 2025-07-12 13:24:03

important 50 years from now is in itself WP:CRYSTALBALLing. Therefore per WP:USERESSAY, it should be moved to userspace. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adoring nanny/Essays/Lab Leak Likely
Rabu, 2021-05-19 21:33:28

jp×g 02:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Keep -- author of the essay here. Per WP:USERESSAY -- Essays that the author does not want others to edit, or that are found...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Three best sources
Selasa, 2025-06-10 07:31:08

Charmer: Thanks for considering.—Alalch E. 14:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC) WP:USERESSAY seems to say that Roy is entitled to keep his version, in the form and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 9
Rabu, 2023-03-22 17:19:36

(currently at least). I certainly had no intention of portraying a WP:USERESSAY such as the one these links redirect to (User:Everymorning/Things that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 June 4
Sabtu, 2021-07-31 01:27:26

debates. As for your comment about the essay itself... take a look at WP:USERESSAY. A2soup (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC) I think you'd find that a good...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2019 March 20
Rabu, 2019-10-09 00:16:34

they are not personal homepages, and are not owned by the user." WP:USERESSAY says: "The author of a personal essay located in his or her user space...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Stern warning about promotion
Jumat, 2026-08-07 03:48:42

2026 (UTC) @Wound theology, unlike WP:GOODBIAS, this is neither a WP:USERESSAY nor a WP:REDIRECT. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:15, 22 July 2026 (UTC) It is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Darkside2000/What the Wikipedian saw
Rabu, 2026-01-21 16:03:48

and I think you !voting delete because you are in disagreement with a useressay. This is what we, as an inclusive community, shouldn't do. --SmokeyJoe...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive314
Kamis, 2026-04-02 22:12:51

draftspace are an underlying cause of this whole dispute. Put these views in a useressay, and in the meantime stop drafting in draftspace. Draftspace is for random...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive BL
Minggu, 2022-06-05 18:23:58

oppose a plain removal. An acceptable middle ground would be to create a {{useressay}} template that categorizes pages to a subcategory of CAT:E, so that they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Larry Sanger/Nine Theses
Jumat, 2025-10-03 05:03:52

Firefangledfeathers. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2025 (UTC) Comment, WP:USERESSAY says (bolding mine) Polemics in the form of personal attacks against particular...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 16
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:28:54

From WP:USERESSAY Writings that contradict policy are somewhat tolerated within the User namespace. The author of a personal essay located in his or her...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Normchou/Essays/Does common sense point to a lab leak origin?
Rabu, 2023-01-04 22:21:13

burn down). --Animalparty! (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC) Keep - WP:USERESSAY - According to Wikipedia policy, "Essays that the author does not want...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Larry Sanger/Editorial parties should be permitted on Wikipedia
Minggu, 2026-06-28 03:50:36

disagree with the changes advocated, this seems to fit squarely within WP:USERESSAY. - RevelationDirect (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Keep – Per Katzrockso...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Zimdars' fake news list
Rabu, 2019-12-04 23:09:04

encyclopedia that anyone can edit" principle and is a direct violation of WP:USERESSAY, which says "According to Wikipedia policy, essays that the author does...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adoring nanny/Essays/Lab Leak Likely (2nd nomination)
Kamis, 2023-07-13 05:51:17

about this at some point?". More realistically: keep per WP:UPYES and WP:USERESSAY, which are very lenient on the content of user essays and intentionally...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 31
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 19:16:30

Essay. A projectspace essay if it is a matter of community concern, or a useressay if it is just him. It needs a whole page to explain, this category doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Citation underkill
Minggu, 2023-03-12 04:30:21

space... if not widely supported, it should be moved to Userspace per WP:USERESSAY. In either case it should not be deleted. Blueboar (talk) 19:38, 17 June...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SMcCandlish/It
Jumat, 2019-03-08 03:56:48

content of this userspace essay is well within the standards defined at WP:USERESSAY and WP:UPYES. Different namespace, different standards; oppose merging...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Yogurt Rule
Senin, 2025-12-29 03:35:57

Do you pledge to give up the WP:OWNership, or do you want it to be a useressay? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC) If you see a concession here...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Martinphi/WEIGHT changes
Senin, 2022-03-28 04:25:06

this study/ambition of policy is hopeless, it should be welcomed as a UserEssay as a matter of principle. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:43, 10 September 2008...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-10-02/News and notes
Selasa, 2025-10-21 05:40:14

WP:POLEMIC, WP:NOTHERE, and WP:WEBHOST for his "essay" when reviewing WP:USERESSAY. – The Grid (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2025 (UTC) And also he violated WP:NQP...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paine Ellsworth 2
Senin, 2023-12-18 02:47:06

violates the WP:TOS. The material in question here falls squarely into WP:USERESSAY territory. There may be other reasons to object to the candidate, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 85
Selasa, 2026-07-28 14:53:10

be to move the page to user space, add {{essay}}, and treat it as a WP:USERESSAY. Otherwise, I think Andy is right that WP:MFD is the appropriate venue...

Click to read more »