Search Results: Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE


Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Sabtu, 2026-08-01 03:25:26

particular, a wikilink is not a reliable source. Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talalima Mobley
Senin, 2025-12-01 13:27:58

webhost. Kleuske (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Further research... WP:SELFSOURCE States the following: Self-published or questionable sources may be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Marxist Tendency (Canada)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 01:59:44

01:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:SELFSOURCE NegroLeagueHistorian (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete: SELFSOURCE allows a primary source to be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen 'Alik Shahadah
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:06:29

See WP:SELFSOURCE FN8. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN9. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN10. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN11....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Breedlove
Selasa, 2025-12-16 11:07:02

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost all sources are WP:SELFSOURCE. No reliable sources to justify inclusion in Wikipedia UtoD 12:51, 8 December...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refinery CMS (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-10-31 11:29:12

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost completely self-sourced, so WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMC Electronic Technical School
Rabu, 2025-12-10 05:35:29

The Banner talk 20:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Do you admit to ignoring WP:SELFSOURCE ? Jzsj (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Remember this one:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/June 2021
Kamis, 2021-07-08 07:49:44

Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2021 June 2 Search Box C++ strings SELFSOURCE and social media services that force you to log in before viewing posts...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inja (band)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 08:41:59

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBAND, only sources are WP:UGC / WP:SPS / WP:SELFSOURCE that do not establish notability Leijurv (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2020...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Grandmothers
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 08:47:13

6 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG, and WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Again...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tomkins
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:54:59

WP:SPORT, and the sole source is far from WP:RELIABLE since it is a WP:SELFSOURCE. — Jkudlick tcs 05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - the appeal of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Potts (artist) (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-12-09 12:01:23

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:SELFSOURCE, 2nd nomination (1st nomination result was delete), notability tag since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:53:25

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A {{third-party}} tag was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gernot Wagner
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 04:01:08

Also: [2] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifehouse International Church Taipei
Jumat, 2025-11-14 09:07:06

independent references. Jlicy (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE information from this article can be used as sources in the merged to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metroland Media Group
Selasa, 2025-11-18 04:35:49

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NCORP, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:SELFSOURCE — Articles primary editors are IPs, Flyerland (talk · contribs),...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Paulo Nunes
Senin, 2025-11-17 20:47:27

the reliablity. Apart from this, such sources can be considered as WP:SELFSOURCE , that can be only used for the information about subject, not as a reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Knapp (4th nomination)
Kamis, 2025-10-23 08:28:44

issue. Also with regards to sourcing of certain statements I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies here. I think mentioning the ban is entirely reasonable as long...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Fowlie
Senin, 2025-12-01 04:55:22

which is used to cite Fowlie's hometown, an acceptable practice per WP:SELFSOURCE.— TAnthonyTalk 22:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC) KEEP - As the creator of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Kovacs
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 05:02:30

myspace and fansite pages which are not considered reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERG). Did not find anything notable in google books etc. -Wikishagnik...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Johnson College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:02:11

college's own prospectus, a primary self-published source that fails both WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:INDEPENDENT. These are the only two references in the article,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohimai Godwin Amaize (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 19:23:19

information is being sourced from the biographee they are often classed with WP:SELFSOURCE. See the essay at WP:Interviews. In this instance it appears that they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Aizawl College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:01:09

coverage exists. Reference 1 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a Vanglaini enrolment notice covering multiple colleges...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thor Robotics unmanned vehicles
Kamis, 2025-12-18 01:59:20

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article is almost entirely WP:SELFSOURCE and makes no attempt to establish notability and instead simply lists...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Aizawl West College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:54:47

WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering a building inauguration...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wodzionka (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-03 08:23:13

self-published book detailing a day's ration in Auschwitz I think the WP:SELFSOURCE exception applies in this instance. I also found a German-language source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Saiha College
Senin, 2026-05-11 18:39:22

References 2, 3, and 4 are all the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE, and reference 3 is additionally a dead link. Every factual claim in the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Vitenas
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:55:19

questionable (self)sources. Awards are from a local webzine (H Texas). Per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ADMASK. Ben Ben (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Kolasib College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:02:28

References 3, 4, and 5 are the college's own website pages, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 6 is a Vanglaini item titled "Kolasib College-a project pahnih...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotbow
Selasa, 2022-02-15 16:20:54

Searched for independent reliable sources and found none. Just UGC and SELFSOURCE. The buzzfile source only demonstrates that the company exists, but does...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:53:28

JSTOR · TWL) The article is was supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A third-party was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Mizoram Law College
Senin, 2026-05-11 13:45:00

WP:INDEPENDENT. Reference 3 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Being the sole law college in Mizoram does not confer notability. If...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Belize/Guidance/sources
Kamis, 2025-08-07 08:55:28

difficult to discover and archive; allowed use in very few cases (see WP:SELFSOURCE). For instance, misspelt names, rounded dates or dates off by a few days...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government J. Buana College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:01:25

tehsil population page and the college's own website, both failing WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:INDEPENDENT. The article exhibits clear markers of LLM generation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inderprastha Dental College
Jumat, 2026-07-17 05:40:34

see WP:RS for what we consider for reliable sources. Specifically, WP:SELFSOURCE says using sources published by the group the article is about can be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolani Maritime Institute
Rabu, 2026-05-20 13:25:08

1 and 3 are archived pages from the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a DGS approved institutes list, a directory entry excluded...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Qarqozak Bridge and Tishreen Dam
Senin, 2025-04-28 06:58:40

out of 10 sources come from Telegram, which could violate WP:UGC or WP:SELFSOURCE, and all sources date back to December 2024, making it outdated in regards...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartke Systems
Selasa, 2025-11-04 21:20:25

2025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV also there is a lot of WP:SELFSOURCE on the page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Delete Agree...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Champhai College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:54:32

excluded by WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a Vanglaini notice of a language course opening, not coverage...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Harner
Selasa, 2025-11-18 04:46:39

the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a WP:SELFSOURCE and/or WP:NPOV issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:07:30

that out for consideration. It can't sustain an article alone per WP:SELFSOURCE#5, though. I'll likely recommend a redirect to Judge Dredd: The Mega Collection...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Peace Before 2021
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:45:08

being just that, WP:GNG for coverage, WP:RELIABLE for reliability, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc, etc =/ Ren99 (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Adventure Time/archive2
Minggu, 2023-02-19 09:31:00

citations to Twitter but these seem to be confined to sources which meet WP:SELFSOURCE, otherwise the sources used comply with reliable sourcing. Web sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Madani Miya Ashrafi al-Jilani
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:08:07

whatever they want about the figure, which seems to create an issue with WP:SELFSOURCE. Regarding the videos and blogs, it's all self published and anyone can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GolfScript
Senin, 2025-11-17 13:59:46

however, they can be used as "reliable" sources about themselves (per WP:SELFSOURCE). In this case, the claim being made (i.e. that GolfScript is widely used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice for women, Bangladesh - JFWBD
Senin, 2025-12-01 05:22:35

I have a tendency to stay away from Facebook as a WP:RS as it is a WP:SELFSOURCE, but it might point a way to some other areas that could be used. - Pmedema...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xahid Khan
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:39:10

হানিফ আলী (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Indicate WP:UGC , WP:SELFSOURCE. not notable till now Worldiswide (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Where...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael John U. Teh
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 05:38:13

21:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC) I believe the appropriate subsection is WP:SELFSOURCE. –HTD 05:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Oppose as there are no sources outside...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Hrangbana College
Selasa, 2026-05-19 05:15:27

WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering an accreditation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Brewer
Selasa, 2025-12-16 11:57:20

blog should be an okay source for the bibliography as indicated in WP:SELFSOURCE, but I see your point about the blog interview. I do have sources for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The NeuroGenderings Network
Selasa, 2025-12-09 16:00:55

mentioned WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE as "violations" as it does not meet Wikipedia’s standard of verifiability. Actually, WP:SELFSOURCE (which is an exception...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amicism
Selasa, 2025-12-09 05:34:17

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable in-universe cruft. All sources are WP:SELFSOURCED Wikias. — IVORK Discuss 03:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Automated comment:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 March 14
Minggu, 2023-03-26 02:14:08

reliable sources. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE allows self published sources in some cases. If the article is about the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Bhattacharya
Minggu, 2025-11-30 20:43:52

WP:PRODBLP twice and tried to explain to the user that Twitter is WP:SELFSOURCED to no avail evidently. Arguably comes under WP:A7 in it's current form...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Security College
Selasa, 2025-12-16 09:22:03

herring. It is not creator states it is valid: it is our guideline WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a blog owned by article subject is WP:RS for neutral factual info...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2021 June 2
Kamis, 2021-06-10 09:05:05

that this is a disservice to readers - if they want to follow up on a SELFSOURCE claim, they will have to jump through a number of hoops to get to the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samundra Institute of Maritime Studies
Rabu, 2026-05-27 22:49:52

and 8 are archived pages from the institution's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is the World Buildings Directory, an architectural catalogue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Hunter Abramson
Selasa, 2026-01-20 16:36:05

August 2017 (UTC) I removed the blog references, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, sources from the subject themselves are allowed for claims that are not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Royal Grammar School, Guildford/1
Selasa, 2026-04-14 06:05:01

concerned about is the school's own website, which is allowable per WP:SELFSOURCE as the source is supporting everyday information about itself, such as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinna (art director)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 01:30:50

whose only sources are IMDb and a dead link (presumably used to be a WP:SELFSOURCE). Copious tone and copyediting issues. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:45, 21 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral yoga (Satchidananda)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 01:52:24

importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published! Shrikanthv...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prey (software)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 02:49:47

2012 (UTC) Responsive to Northamerica1000, Procedural Keep: WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves “Self-published …...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euphorics Id
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 21:14:57

article. How does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker benedict
Senin, 2025-12-01 14:33:47

I'd specifically direct you to sections like WP:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFSOURCE as well as of course WP:COI. Editors are strongly discouraged when it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Dodgeball League
Sabtu, 2026-02-14 07:19:02

scale to address errors of fact might be just about "OK" (relative to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF), basing an entire article on such sources is highly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro Tech Maritime Academy
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:48:39

the institution's own website pages for individual courses, failing WP:SELFSOURCE en masse and representing exactly the kind of course-catalogue transcription...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fit-Boy
Senin, 2025-11-17 11:55:46

(from public cyber) 11:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Jim Carter: Check WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a film is not independent of itself but it is one of those instances...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 8
Minggu, 2018-10-14 08:37:44

reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)" Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC) CASSIOPEIA (Not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apogee Stadium/archive1
Senin, 2025-09-08 08:26:57

the information is self-submitted by the builders, it seems to meet WP:SELFSOURCE requirements. At the same time, if this is an issue, I don't think a whole...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversion Hub (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:19:35

WP:CORPDEPTH. Secondly, the additional references are in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE. I don't fell that any of the points made in these references make the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morvarid Karimi
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:42:58

not writing about the subject itself, and in any event would be a WP:SELFSOURCE even if it were to contain tangential information on the subject. WP:PROF...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Sleep Apnea Database
Senin, 2025-11-17 10:57:35

caution those who may wish to remove certain citations, that under WP:SELFSOURCE, non-contentious information that is not unduly self-serving MAY be supplied...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of device tracking software
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 21:18:08

must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources …. WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves Self-published...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bianchi
Senin, 2025-12-01 08:16:44

sources for awards are not reliable because they are self-published (see WP:SELFSOURCE) ignores the meaning of "self", in this case. The National Sportscasters...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Raymond D. Tarbuck/1
Sabtu, 2023-12-09 02:53:04

independent of the subject is a concern, this must be contrasted with WP:SELFSOURCE) and there is also coverage in secondary sources. I do see several independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:49:45

also said is not necessary per WP:SELFSOURCE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Necrothesp, WP:SELFSOURCE is in fact the reason that I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Robert Garran/archive1
Minggu, 2020-08-02 07:15:37

still some self sources, these appear to me to be consistent with WP:SELFSOURCE, being either about Garran or identified as direct quotes by Garran about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Accolade (company)/archive1
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 04:03:03

standard for WP:RS with flying colors, as well as the lower standard at WP:SELFSOURCE for uncontroversial claims about the interview subject. Hardcore Gaming...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui
Sabtu, 2025-09-06 21:09:49

that they are fandom-style blogs run by specific groups. According to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERGENERATED, such fansites are generally not acceptable as sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barlowe's Guide to Fantasy
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:07:53

2018 (UTC) I know the ad was unorthodox, but doesn't it qualify as WP:SELFSOURCE? Many articles on books include them being selected for some "Book of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Barrow
Senin, 2025-06-09 05:45:39

and cannot support controversial points, but it's still usable under WP:SELFSOURCE for the basic facts of Barrow's birth and education and I've restored...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samizdat: And Other Issues Regarding the 'Source' of Open Source Code
Selasa, 2025-11-18 15:05:31

source of information about Dennis Ritchie, in an article about him (WP:SELFSOURCE). Although inline references are preferable, there is no requirement saying...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SndControl
Minggu, 2025-11-16 00:39:58

meets the guidelines. In regards to citing self-published articles WP:SELFSOURCE, nothing here is unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim, it does...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Meir
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:42:12

found through research) seeming to violate WP:COI, if not directly WP:SELFSOURCE. For those sources for which I was not able to find direct evidence of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Tylleman
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 13:03:45

(talk) No one is disputing FB as an acceptable External link, but per WP:SELFSOURCE it should not be used as a source if it is unduly self-serving. I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2012 June 19
Jumat, 2023-01-20 00:09:42

sources due to the language here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE There is multiple sources for this wiki if the site itself is counted...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 August 21
Minggu, 2020-10-25 06:46:28

on themselves" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE&redirect=yes) and if not how can this article be improved considering...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReVanced
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:46:30

again, we are dependent on what reliable independent sources say; per WP:SELFSOURCE, primary sources are only used for self-descriptive information such as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 February 5
Jumat, 2022-03-18 17:16:02

or non-reliable, sources for notability purposes are WP:SELFPUB and WP:SELFSOURCE, which clearly show that they cannot be used to establish notability....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Toon Disney
Selasa, 2025-11-18 01:16:28

would be more useful. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, self-published sources can be used for the purposes of verification for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Society of Military Comptrollers
Minggu, 2025-11-16 21:58:12

the five sections in the article. Finally, according to Wikipedia (WP:SELFSOURCE), self-published sources (like the ASMC web-site) may be used for information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington University Emergency Support Team
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:34:32

interpreted. The basic argument here is OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST smooshed with SELFSOURCED. That's really not a sufficient reason to blow up a competent, verifiable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 118
Jumat, 2023-03-24 20:05:44

(UTC) Conservapedia is generally regarded as an unreliable source. WP:SELFSOURCE says that Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Belize/Guidance
Rabu, 2025-08-06 17:23:57

difficult to discover and archive; allowed use in very few cases (see WP:SELFSOURCE). For instance, misspelt names, rounded dates or dates off by a few days...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 November 6
Sabtu, 2018-11-10 08:49:15

November 2018 (UTC) @Dbfirs: I have done citations much, but I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies. RudolfRed (talk) 20:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC) Ah, yes, this is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:28:24

See WP:SELFSOURCE FN8. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN9. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN10. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN11....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 27
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:13:38

webhost. Kleuske (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Further research... WP:SELFSOURCE States the following: Self-published or questionable sources may be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MauBank WithMe
Jumat, 2025-12-12 12:19:57

something other than himself, which doesn't meet the standards for WP:SELFSOURCE). [5] This seems to be some sort of user-generated profile about the bank...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive446
Kamis, 2022-02-03 09:53:32

certain situation, which is exactly what I did here. You can check WP:SELFSOURCE for more information. If u still disagree with me. I am happy to take...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:11:41

in an article about himself? It seems to meet all the criteria for WP:SELFSOURCE, being that he is the source, he is talking about himself and not any...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 August 10
Kamis, 2023-08-17 14:57:52

quotation? Indiana6724 (talk) 09:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Check Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE which explains when you can cite Twitter (or other social media accounts)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Christian Church (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-10 07:05:06

wikiGnomes still rejected the page with no objection to the Icoc page's 80+ selfsourced links. Same for the Kip McKean page; it is 95% self sourced. If a pile...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conica AG
Selasa, 2025-12-16 03:23:21

non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is basically not all...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Minggu, 2026-08-09 04:34:35

certainly not the same as writing the bulk of our articles. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE states the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive754
Kamis, 2026-07-09 06:14:30

3 June 2012 (UTC)  note timestamp. notation added by Ohiostandard. WP:SELFSOURCE. Also deleted was proof that the "stories" the fake newspaper was reporting...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:45:57

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive244
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:50:40

warned by two different editors that his source could not be used (per WP:SELFSOURCE), but he just ignored them. Coltsfan (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Previous...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 20:30:16

page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers
Minggu, 2026-08-09 01:30:41

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive267
Senin, 2026-02-23 15:19:43

seems a fairly straightforward understanding of WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE. Given you need to show the closure to be unreasonable understanding of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:30:19

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive139
Senin, 2025-08-18 05:07:43

majority of cases, these advocacy organizations were not being used as WP:SELFSOURCE but as sources for factual assertions. This is quite problematic. I apologize...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patty Walters
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:47:39

article, though they are not preferred, are considered valid sources per WP:SELFSOURCE, and are used only for things such as his full name, birth date, and quotations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Revenge (band)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 01:55:11

in this article is permissible because it meets criteria 1-5 under WP:SELFSOURCE. Roshanbo (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Delete: Allmusic seems to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 153
Senin, 2022-05-09 23:01:27

any neutral sources, so wikipedians erroneously categorize that as WP:SELFSOURCE. Since wikipedia gets hailed as the only necessary tertiary source, tertiary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1045
Rabu, 2025-09-24 20:45:24

asserted that the Daily Mail fails WP:RS but there is an exception for WP:SELFSOURCE which would seem to apply. Furthermore, links to the Daily Mail are not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:XfD today
Rabu, 2026-06-17 18:08:05

page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 December 27
Senin, 2022-03-07 00:24:29

former player and it is the only available source. See also WP:SPS and WP:SELFSOURCE. Eagleash (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC) please change the DOB of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive930
Rabu, 2026-03-11 04:36:52

John from Idegon (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC) @John from Idegon: WP:SELFSOURCE. Xboxmanwar (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC) I am at a loss as to how...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive681
Jumat, 2025-10-17 04:18:36

User:Alvez3 made this posting on my Talk page which IMHO is an unprovoked/unjustified personal attack . He/she changed some long-standing text (in place...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive742
Senin, 2024-01-22 04:08:26

under WP:N. And I've read WP:RS many times, and this source fulfills WP:SELFSOURCE. It is also *self evident* that the best source for a statement that X...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284
Minggu, 2026-02-22 08:25:23

informal rule; if it's Saudi-controlled, don't use it for anything except WP:SELFSOURCE. HLHJ (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) I would vote support for your...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093
Jumat, 2023-04-21 16:36:01

of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided." and WP:SELFSOURCE says to be careful with self-published sources when they are self-serving...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive910
Sabtu, 2026-07-11 09:05:27

he thinks Facebook, Twitter, etc., are unreliable, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, that premise is wrong. Like I said, tried to address that, ignored it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1053
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:24:46

I believe this is the same IP who reported me at ANI, which was a failure, but that is besides the point. I would like to focus on the personal attacks...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 August 17
Senin, 2023-02-27 21:26:59

with using something selfpublished (like Facebook or Twitter) per WP:SELFSOURCE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC) In the Dragon boat...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive897
Selasa, 2023-02-14 07:59:27

interview as specific example, which is a 3rd party source. Also, as per WP:SELFSOURCE we should agree on how to include the TeI publications and bring back...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive283
Sabtu, 2026-07-04 19:14:54

how this gossip blog is a reliable source for anything other than WP:SELFSOURCE purposes? Is this website family the kind of source upon which Britannica...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1025
Minggu, 2024-11-17 13:53:03

think we are confusing two issues here. The first is the amount of WP:SELFSOURCE material that is appropriate and for which facts it is appropriate. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive993
Sabtu, 2025-07-19 03:09:26

Shevinsky on what she considers herself. That all seem to fall within WP:SELFSOURCE of which Breitbart is still valid for. And yet none of these can be added...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1068
Selasa, 2026-06-09 06:32:06

Indeed in the diffs, some of these references were used in an explicitly SELFSOURCE context. I'd suggest that Amigao could benefit from taking some due care...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1003
Selasa, 2026-03-24 16:29:39

archives where I tried to explain to you under what circumstances WP:SELFSOURCE can be used, and also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The 2019 Venezuelan presidential...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive208
Minggu, 2025-08-17 00:06:16

with any evidence. I did, and still do, disagree with JzG's read of WP:SELFSOURCE, and I fully admit to adding self sourced cites to the article in question...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive951
Jumat, 2024-10-18 02:49:10

reliably sourced, and the part he was adding I would call, at best, a WP:SELFSOURCE that could only apply to statements about themselves. That said, I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive123
Kamis, 2026-07-09 00:52:04

sumgait.info, budapest.sumgait.info, unverifiable rating site seem to be WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:PRIMARY, and do not meet the notability, verifiability and reliability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive116
Minggu, 2025-08-17 06:06:10

assertion that rulings by Bishops or the Vatican are mere opinions or WP:SELFSOURCE is naked POV; they have the rule of law, but are arcane and of little...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Awards
Rabu, 2026-08-05 21:11:44

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elliott Fitch Shepard/archive2
Selasa, 2026-01-20 19:57:20

--Laser brain (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) @Laser brain: Please see WP:SELFSOURCE. I use a webpage on the Scarborough Presbyterian Church's website to cite...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 198
Sabtu, 2023-07-29 00:46:52

fails WP:SELFSOURCE -- LinkedIn pages generally fail WP:RS and therefore can only be used for the very very narrow exceptions WP:SELFSOURCE defines, which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian theory of Shakespeare authorship
Kamis, 2025-12-11 14:55:00

sources (i.e. they meet WP:RS by complying with the guidelines in WP:SELFSOURCE). The sourcing is a little bit weak in places, but not because of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolla
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 23:57:43

(Self-published information is not denied by Wikipedia policy per se, see e.g. WP:SELFSOURCE.) --TuukkaH (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC) There is not much information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 123
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 22:57:13

I'm currently thinking about are both pretty much conflict-free). WP:SELFSOURCE is a decent start, but I'm not sure if it's sufficient to allow removal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:09:03

mentioned WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE as "violations" as it does not meet Wikipedia’s standard of verifiability. Actually, WP:SELFSOURCE (which is an exception...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayden Boche
Rabu, 2025-12-10 08:05:30

recording artists may be used as sources of information about themselves WP:SELFSOURCE, especially in the context of news-related articles with no reasonable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 February 18
Senin, 2022-03-28 11:42:39

postings could be used as sources of information about themselves. WP:SELFSOURCE. This should only be used in exceptional circumstances, best to find a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 172
Kamis, 2025-11-13 18:28:18

third party and I think it's a good start. However, I came across WP:SELFSOURCE, which seems to suggest that I could use a YouTube video of the subject...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 160
Rabu, 2021-09-22 07:12:09

in our article on Headlines. It would be like using a WP:PRIMARY or WP:SELFSOURCE with a secondary source to demonstrate notability. Of course none of this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (all)
Sabtu, 2022-06-11 18:09:49

certainly not the same as writing the bulk of our articles. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE states the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132
Sabtu, 2022-06-04 18:55:22

uninvolved comment from editors with expertise on WP:RS. Controversy over WP:SELFSOURCE and probably untrue WP:BLP material being added to [Article]Sandra Fluke...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-11-17 06:24:44

publication found it fit to publish. That makes it not a WP:RS. Please see WP:SELFSOURCED. Otherwise, every university student's term paper could be considered...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 120
Minggu, 2026-07-05 20:43:43

It's all explained in Questionable and self-published sources, see WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF in particular. As an encyclopedia we are interested in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 30
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:21:05

The Banner talk 20:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Do you admit to ignoring WP:SELFSOURCE ? Jzsj (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Remember this one:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Geocodes
Jumat, 2025-11-28 02:13:43

WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE. Some of them are a bit lazily implemented like citation #19 for the open...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Robert Jacomb-Hood/archive1
Senin, 2026-03-30 17:55:49

can't even do my own research / write my own biography per Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE) is a bit demoralising. I gather there is no biography written about RJH...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Massachusetts Institute of Technology fraternities, sororities, and ILGs
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:18:39

them. I was careful not to use "self-published" books, but did see WP:SELFSOURCE, and think my references pass the 5-point sniff test therein. Some famous...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Baker
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 19:35:36

questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:10:25

article. How does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 30
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:50:01

01:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:SELFSOURCE NegroLeagueHistorian (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete: SELFSOURCE allows a primary source to be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 11
Minggu, 2022-05-15 01:12:14

a reliable source per WP:UGC, they are sometimes appropriate under WP:SELFSOURCE. I agree that tweets are cited far too often in Wikipedia. But I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super-Duper Missile
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:29:29

know better than this. Any experienced editor should know that per WP:SELFSOURCE "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242
Minggu, 2025-02-23 22:12:11

sites that are considered WP:RS Are non-contentious facts based on WP:SELFSOURCE considered reliable? For the first point, some of the major sites reporting...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 17
Minggu, 2020-11-29 01:31:12

also said is not necessary per WP:SELFSOURCE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Necrothesp, WP:SELFSOURCE is in fact the reason that I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:56:20

in this article is permissible because it meets criteria 1-5 under WP:SELFSOURCE. Roshanbo (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Delete: Allmusic seems to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 310
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:43

(UTC) Comment: The policies/guidelines in play are WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:BLPSOURCES, and WP:CHALLENGE. Yesterday, I laid out my case in detail...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 289
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:14:21

Gerard (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC) The bios would fall under WP:SELFSOURCE or WP:BLPSELFPUB. Atsme Talk 📧 14:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Prose, unless...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:42:57

myspace and fansite pages which are not considered reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERG). Did not find anything notable in google books etc. -Wikishagnik...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1072
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 05:30:14

a few things, it is okay, as long as it is kept to a minimum. See WP:SELFSOURCE RudolfRed (talk) 01:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Hi, Michie740, I assume the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anachronox/archive1
Minggu, 2023-03-26 00:44:36

source? I think the source is ok. I think it falls on the line of WP:SELFSOURCE. GamerPro64 21:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC) References are otherwise generally...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istituto San Leone Magno
Jumat, 2025-12-12 08:52:20

exceptional claim(s)" should have been deleted from the article, as per WP:SELFSOURCE Jzsj (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Nope. Otherwise I wouldn't have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 21
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:49:41

2014 (UTC) See Talk:List_of_notable_Ice_Bucket_Challenge_participants#WP:SELFSOURCE.3F. You need to stop removing references to the official YouTube and Facebook...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:51:19

the five sections in the article. Finally, according to Wikipedia (WP:SELFSOURCE), self-published sources (like the ASMC web-site) may be used for information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 3
Selasa, 2022-07-26 04:48:51

blog should be an okay source for the bibliography as indicated in WP:SELFSOURCE, but I see your point about the blog interview. I do have sources for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 3
Senin, 2020-09-07 17:11:01

Searched for independent reliable sources and found none. Just UGC and SELFSOURCE. The buzzfile source only demonstrates that the company exists, but does...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:20:44

self-published book detailing a day's ration in Auschwitz I think the WP:SELFSOURCE exception applies in this instance. I also found a German-language source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 54
Kamis, 2025-10-16 10:58:39

of these articles (1%), cleaned up eight, and in addition to a valid SelfSource RS I found businesses, universities, local governments, and national government...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 29
Rabu, 2022-06-08 17:17:46

herring. It is not creator states it is valid: it is our guideline WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a blog owned by article subject is WP:RS for neutral factual info...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:38:29

I'd specifically direct you to sections like WP:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFSOURCE as well as of course WP:COI. Editors are strongly discouraged when it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:11:24

publication found it fit to publish. That makes it not a WP:RS. Please see WP:SELFSOURCED. Otherwise, every university student's term paper could be considered...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources
Senin, 2026-03-23 07:01:09

Parlett's site are promotional, so are not reliable beyond the limits of WP:SELFSOURCE. Polygon Board game + Video game news and review articles Polygon is considered...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1063
Minggu, 2025-08-17 01:44:46

things for which it can be used are quite narrow. See WP:USERG and WP:SELFSOURCE S Philbrick(Talk) 18:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Thank you. How do I go about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 210
Rabu, 2026-06-17 07:02:08

Atsme📞📧 14:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC) There's a general guideline at WP:SELFSOURCE, might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:11:19

source of information about Dennis Ritchie, in an article about him (WP:SELFSOURCE). Although inline references are preferable, there is no requirement saying...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 20
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:50:52

know better than this. Any experienced editor should know that per WP:SELFSOURCE "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 157
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:44

for uncontentious biographical information from interviews, as per WP:SELFSOURCE, and possibly for other information relevant to People as per Context...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:47:37

Unreliable according to Examplo347, but that is not in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE, which even explicitly mentions Facebook. The source is only used to establish...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Zirin
Rabu, 2025-12-03 05:48:29

self-published by the subject can be used sparingly per WP:PRIMARY, WP:BIASED, WP:SELFSOURCE. Zirin is by no means the most notable lawyer or writer in New York, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 14
Sabtu, 2022-07-23 01:30:32

non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is basically not all...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:55:46

questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 8
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:03:36

however, they can be used as "reliable" sources about themselves (per WP:SELFSOURCE). In this case, the claim being made (i.e. that GolfScript is widely used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:54:34

caution those who may wish to remove certain citations, that under WP:SELFSOURCE, non-contentious information that is not unduly self-serving MAY be supplied...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:48:02

then have a cast-iron source (not third-party but, I think, fine by WP:SELFSOURCE) and the criterion for including a sub-list on the page would be that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:44:35

sources for awards are not reliable because they are self-published (see WP:SELFSOURCE) ignores the meaning of "self", in this case. The National Sportscasters...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:16:05

2018 (UTC) I know the ad was unorthodox, but doesn't it qualify as WP:SELFSOURCE? Many articles on books include them being selected for some "Book of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 26
Selasa, 2020-07-07 08:24:25

them. I was careful not to use "self-published" books, but did see WP:SELFSOURCE, and think my references pass the 5-point sniff test therein. Some famous...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 8
Rabu, 2020-10-21 03:58:10

that out for consideration. It can't sustain an article alone per WP:SELFSOURCE#5, though. I'll likely recommend a redirect to Judge Dredd: The Mega Collection...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1031
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:56:37

sources for any reason except when they are possibly cited as such per WP:SELFSOURCE. So, Wikipedia doesn't consider itself reliable for the most part and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 24
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 01:34:18

something other than himself, which doesn't meet the standards for WP:SELFSOURCE). [36] This seems to be some sort of user-generated profile about the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:15:54

would be more useful. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, self-published sources can be used for the purposes of verification for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 27
Kamis, 2020-12-10 00:04:34

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBAND, only sources are WP:UGC / WP:SPS / WP:SELFSOURCE that do not establish notability Leijurv (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2020...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Archive.is RFC 3
Sabtu, 2026-04-25 03:03:25

sources for WP:NPOV, unlike archive.is, which is not a source (remember WP:SELFSOURCE). We do not use their services (like putting a pipebomb somewhere). See...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:30:19

which is used to cite Fowlie's hometown, an acceptable practice per WP:SELFSOURCE.— TAnthonyTalk 22:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC) KEEP - As the creator of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:21:56

JSTOR · TWL) The article is was supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A third-party was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:06:10

(talk) No one is disputing FB as an acceptable External link, but per WP:SELFSOURCE it should not be used as a source if it is unduly self-serving. I don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2012 June 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 15:43:05

authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources. see WP:SELFSOURCE. The third party bar and the fact that she has not published the material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 776
Senin, 2022-02-21 14:50:29

reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)". Thank you and cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 December 8
Sabtu, 2022-12-17 02:48:58

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost all sources are WP:SELFSOURCE. No reliable sources to justify inclusion in Wikipedia UtoD 12:51, 8 December...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:06:05

follow certain rules-- one of which that particular citation did break WP:SELFSOURCE.) I think these changes and those already made by other editors has greatly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:43:17

2 June 2019 (UTC) Option 4 or option 3 at best. We can literally use SELFSOURCE to state that MintPress is widely considered unreliable. They have built...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:28:47

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable in-universe cruft. All sources are WP:SELFSOURCED Wikias. — IVORK Discuss 03:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Automated comment:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 1
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:16:47

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A {{third-party}} tag was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 316
Selasa, 2021-08-10 21:30:34

see an emerging consensus for that, as long as we have the caveat of WP:SELFSOURCE, referred to by "The source may still be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:03

Also: [13] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:36

Also: [12] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:29:01

importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published! Shrikanthv...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:51:26

August 2017 (UTC) I removed the blog references, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, sources from the subject themselves are allowed for claims that are not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:25:49

independent references. Jlicy (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE information from this article can be used as sources in the merged to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive318
Selasa, 2022-08-30 21:37:39

BLPNAME protections. This is a WP:SELFSOURCE issue, not a BLPNAME issue. If a reliable source can be found, or SELFSOURCE can be satisfied, I see no reason...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:02:44

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NCORP, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:SELFSOURCE — Articles primary editors are IPs, Flyerland (talk · contribs),...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179
Sabtu, 2023-12-30 14:34:33

had the BRI said this directly themselves we could have used it as a WP:SELFSOURCE. (we are talking about a free online course that they don't make money...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:20:06

self-published by the subject can be used sparingly per WP:PRIMARY, WP:BIASED, WP:SELFSOURCE. Zirin is by no means the most notable lawyer or writer in New York, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ice Bucket Challenge participants
Selasa, 2025-11-18 00:12:38

2014 (UTC) See Talk:List_of_notable_Ice_Bucket_Challenge_participants#WP:SELFSOURCE.3F. You need to stop removing references to the official YouTube and Facebook...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:38:00

I have a tendency to stay away from Facebook as a WP:RS as it is a WP:SELFSOURCE, but it might point a way to some other areas that could be used. - Pmedema...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 29
Selasa, 2021-07-13 02:38:18

sources (i.e. they meet WP:RS by complying with the guidelines in WP:SELFSOURCE). The sourcing is a little bit weak in places, but not because of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 508
Senin, 2023-03-27 10:00:21

purview of WP:SELFSOURCE as social media. TimothyJosephWood 19:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC) @Verified Cactus, Timothyjosephwood I agree, WP:SELFSOURCE is applicable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2014 October 23
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:31:01

from independent, reliable third-party sources (see WP:RS, especially WP:SELFSOURCE). Most people won't complain, when some basic facts are taken from his...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315
Rabu, 2021-12-08 12:55:12

described, and should only be used in accordance with the five-factor WP:SELFSOURCE test. Neutralitytalk 00:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC) I think your opinion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:54:47

must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources …. WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves Self-published...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 5
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:09:45

article, though they are not preferred, are considered valid sources per WP:SELFSOURCE, and are used only for things such as his full name, birth date, and quotations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:04:14

(UTC) The book on the school's history is quite acceptable as per WP:SELFSOURCE. It is factual and not unduly self-serving. There is no reason to suppose...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:01:02

21:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC) I believe the appropriate subsection is WP:SELFSOURCE. –HTD 05:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Oppose as there are no sources outside...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:45:09

the offending text re-sourced or removed. I also have to point out WP:SELFSOURCE, to wit, Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241
Senin, 2026-07-27 07:12:36

Reddit. (Curiously, Reddit is mentioned in WP:SELFPUB, but not in WP:SELFSOURCE.) I understand that reddit comments are generally considered to obviously...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:55:25

2012 (UTC) Responsive to Northamerica1000, Procedural Keep: WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves “Self-published …...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:58:07

wikiGnomes still rejected the page with no objection to the Icoc page's 80+ selfsourced links. Same for the Kip McKean page; it is 95% self sourced. If a pile...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:51:09

(from public cyber) 11:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Jim Carter: Check WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a film is not independent of itself but it is one of those instances...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 9
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:57:16

the reliablity. Apart from this, such sources can be considered as WP:SELFSOURCE , that can be only used for the information about subject, not as a reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:56:10

talk page :/ Informedskeptic (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE guideline seems to give the green light to using Facebook for a D.O.B...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:26:00

information is being sourced from the biographee they are often classed with WP:SELFSOURCE. See the essay at WP:Interviews. In this instance it appears that they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:33:13

Wikipedia policy regarding use of self-published material. According to WP:SELFSOURCE: "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 February 3
Senin, 2022-03-28 11:42:09

above, there are some limited cases where Facebook may be used; see WP:SELFSOURCE for details. However, that would require that the Deep Springs College...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190
Minggu, 2023-03-19 06:36:09

sourcing sufficient to establish verifiability at content level (per WP:SELFSOURCE). My question has nothing to do with then extracting content from the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:40:32

WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE. Some of them are a bit lazily implemented like citation #19 for the open...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:00:41

I am a bit unclear how it words regarding tweets from Twitter. WP:SELFSOURCE mentions: These requirements also apply to pages from social networking websites...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:52

determining reliability, per WP:RSSELF, as towards whether they count as a WP:SELFSOURCE or could qualify an 'exception' as "Self-published material may sometimes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:22:53

not writing about the subject itself, and in any event would be a WP:SELFSOURCE even if it were to contain tangential information on the subject. WP:PROF...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 3
Kamis, 2020-11-12 05:51:02

exceptional claim(s)" should have been deleted from the article, as per WP:SELFSOURCE Jzsj (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Nope. Otherwise I wouldn't have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:27:15

WP:CORPDEPTH. Secondly, the additional references are in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE. I don't fell that any of the points made in these references make the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 30
Selasa, 2022-10-25 23:06:18

is clearly related to WP:RS, especially the sections WP:BIASED, and WP:SELFSOURCE and the sections in between those including WP:QUESTIONABLE. Given the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 140
Minggu, 2026-04-19 18:09:26

Jehovah's Witnesses official website, 2010". I checked WP:PSTS and WP:SELFSOURCE, and the only potential problem I can see is authorship. The WTS publications...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:37

third-party sources. Collect (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE says different. A press release is not a WP:SOURCE, the party publishing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:51:17

interpreted. The basic argument here is OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST smooshed with SELFSOURCED. That's really not a sufficient reason to blow up a competent, verifiable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:17:25

whatever they want about the figure, which seems to create an issue with WP:SELFSOURCE. Regarding the videos and blogs, it's all self published and anyone can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 November 20
Rabu, 2025-11-26 10:04:46

does not accept self-published sources, it makes an exception for WP:SELFSOURCE when describing the subject matter itself, which is the case for this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everywhere at the End of Time/archive1
Kamis, 2022-03-24 07:05:51

don't see how one source would be more reliable than the other, per WP:SELFSOURCE, and Kirby confirmed that this is his YouTube channel throughout various...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The People's Cube
Senin, 2025-12-01 13:58:04

the offending text re-sourced or removed. I also have to point out WP:SELFSOURCE, to wit, Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 525
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:17:38

material used as sources of information about the subject themselves here WP:SELFSOURCE. I can see no reason not to use a university published article as a reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 17
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:04:10

being just that, WP:GNG for coverage, WP:RELIABLE for reliability, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc, etc =/ Ren99 (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:53:40

recording artists may be used as sources of information about themselves WP:SELFSOURCE, especially in the context of news-related articles with no reasonable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:42:29

WP:SPORT, and the sole source is far from WP:RELIABLE since it is a WP:SELFSOURCE. — Jkudlick tcs 05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - the appeal of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:54:23

(Self-published information is not denied by Wikipedia policy per se, see e.g. WP:SELFSOURCE.) --TuukkaH (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC) There is not much information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 664
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:13:21

with the company, Uaria2008. Aguyintobooks is wrong about that. See WP:SELFSOURCE for advice on when such sources can be acceptable. Cordless Larry (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 293
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:43

published by a reliable source, we don't even have to invoke WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SELFSOURCE because the interview would simply be considered reliable. However, the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 596
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:16:01

07:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Concerns with understanding WP:RS and with WP:SELFSOURCE are in regards to a new article for Talalima Mobley - basically, I've...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 155
Minggu, 2026-03-15 17:21:14

source for statements about that particular village, sort of like WP:SELFSOURCE? (Normally I avoid using such sites, but this particular page provides...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 9
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:08:32

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:SELFSOURCE, 2nd nomination (1st nomination result was delete), notability tag since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:52:17

WP:PRODBLP twice and tried to explain to the user that Twitter is WP:SELFSOURCED to no avail evidently. Arguably comes under WP:A7 in it's current form...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 67
Minggu, 2025-08-17 13:39:43

I'd tend to accept a verifiably authentic CV as reliable only for WP:SELFSOURCE claims (which appears to be the same as WP:SELFPUB). I wasn't trying to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:37:36

meets the guidelines. In regards to citing self-published articles WP:SELFSOURCE, nothing here is unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim, it does...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cook
Selasa, 2025-11-18 07:44:49

talk page :/ Informedskeptic (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE guideline seems to give the green light to using Facebook for a D.O.B...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bäckadräkten/archive1
Kamis, 2025-09-04 20:49:25

reactions, but I've left the references to the disinformation websites as WP:SELFSOURCE. Now that it's in the article, I think those sentences provide valuable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:58:03

the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a WP:SELFSOURCE and/or WP:NPOV issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136
Rabu, 2026-03-11 21:14:15

subject itself and does not have any claims about any third party. Refer WP:SELFSOURCE. Even if Lorna hadn't cited any reference in her article, the source is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 495
Senin, 2024-09-30 21:26:57

on your part. Sorry. --ColinFine (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE allows you to cite self-published sources under certain circumstances...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200
Jumat, 2023-04-28 00:01:27

supported just by MFA's site ? “WarKosign” 20:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE can be used as long as the "The material is neither unduly self-serving...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 122
Kamis, 2026-06-25 11:24:53

obvious that in this particular case it is. As to the content I believe WP:SELFSOURCE applies - the actual source is the actress involved giving statements...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232
Selasa, 2026-03-03 00:21:16

from the company that makes and sells P90X, which seems to breach WP:SELFSOURCE, as it makes claims about the alleged benefits of their product. [43]...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 204
Kamis, 2024-10-17 07:12:09

can be a decent source for simply documenting that a book exist(ed).WP:SELFSOURCE Like many websites, portions of Goodreads is user generated, as is metacritic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 260
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:56:45

as sources of information about themselves, in some situations. See WP:SELFSOURCE. Without diffs or the specific claims and sources we can't say much else...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Russian Bride
Senin, 2025-12-01 14:00:13

Unreliable according to Examplo347, but that is not in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE, which even explicitly mentions Facebook. The source is only used to establish...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174
Kamis, 2025-09-11 00:10:35

are about the claims, not her, when you want to get out of meeting WP:SELFSOURCE. This material does not meet either policy exception for sourcing stuff...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braeden Wright
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:30:59

follow certain rules-- one of which that particular citation did break WP:SELFSOURCE.) I think these changes and those already made by other editors has greatly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:12

appropriate to include his opinions about her on her page, given that WP:SELFSOURCE itself says... "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 227
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 21:29:09

self-published source, one we could cite only as a WP:PRIMARY document or via WP:SELFSOURCE. There are some exceptions; we know their sources for the CIA World Factbook...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Workshop
Kamis, 2023-03-09 05:09:54

distort the holocaust may still be able to be used in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE but not much else. I'm not saying you're completely right in the content...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 328
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:00

referencing Glaukopis. Volunteer Marek 19:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Under WP:SELFSOURCE! It was an account of Chodakiewicz's "fall from grace" by his colleague...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Institutes in India
Minggu, 2025-11-30 00:47:02

then have a cast-iron source (not third-party but, I think, fine by WP:SELFSOURCE) and the criterion for including a sub-list on the page would be that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 210
Kamis, 2026-02-19 18:02:47

sourced to third-party sources. The full relevant guideline is at WP:SELFSOURCE. Hope that helps, Yunshui 雲水 12:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Though children's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 376
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:59

interviews, if sufficiently illuminating, would be permissible under WP:SELFSOURCE, and so in that case I agree with X-750. Chubbles (talk) 23:14, 30 May...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:38:17

questionable (self)sources. Awards are from a local webzine (H Texas). Per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ADMASK. Ben Ben (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 299
Minggu, 2026-03-15 22:11:36

the grounds that, as others have observed, it may be an appropriate WP:SELFSOURCE for suitable material that isn't available anywhere else permissible,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192
Senin, 2025-09-01 03:35:53

information about themselves or their activities. See also WP:TWITTER and WP:SELFSOURCE. Imo, it can also be used as source #2, if source #1 is a WP:RS, and that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 205
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:41

pride. I followed the link to QUESTIONED which led to this list for WP:SELFSOURCE The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2022 June 9
Senin, 2022-06-13 07:28:36

but is instead a "self source" and must be used with caution: see WP:SELFSOURCE. Arch dude (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Everyone above seems to be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 430
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:19:20

cite the musician's website as a source for some content, as long as WP:SELFSOURCE is followed. If you do this, make sure that text is not directly copied...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive161
Sabtu, 2026-04-11 14:52:51

explicitly prohibit using self-published sources talking of themselves (see WP:SELFSOURCE); however the moment an editor disputes a claim, you end up with no support...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:56

--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE provides an exception only for self-published (non-reviewed) material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:54:22

considered reliable for providing Bostom's views at Andrew Bostom per WP:SELFSOURCE.VR talk 12:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Agreed, this should not be used. It's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:09

something as being what her opinion is about it, so passes due to WP:SELFSOURCE. The article does portray her view of the Washington Post next to a Tampa...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:44:23

(UTC) The book on the school's history is quite acceptable as per WP:SELFSOURCE. It is factual and not unduly self-serving. There is no reason to suppose...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/August 2020
Jumat, 2020-08-28 09:03:38

still some self sources, these appear to me to be consistent with WP:SELFSOURCE, being either about Garran or identified as direct quotes by Garran about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive194
Minggu, 2026-02-22 15:29:03

acknowledges that this is an unreliable source, but sees it as a case of WP:SELFSOURCE. My own view (I had to remove a whole lot of much worse sludge sourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 16:31:47

contain trip reports, which might theoretically be used per WP:RSOPINION/WP:SELFSOURCE with the usual disclaimers, but I'm not familiar enough with either the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:00

while WP:BLPPRIMARY suggests a birth certificate not be depended upon, WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:SELFPUB, and more specifically WP:DOB, shows how a birth date in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 325
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:11

Darwish as a source on wikipedia for anything other herself (as per WP:SELFSOURCE)? Darwish keeps popping up and I'd rather not waste more of the community's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 154
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:41:04

However.... has Gastler ever publicly tweeted that information? See WP:SELFSOURCE. As long as usage criteria are met, self-sources such as an official tweet...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 323
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:37

about literally every site that we do consider unreliable?" Yes, per WP:SELFSOURCE, virtually any source is reliable as proof that source wrote something...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245
Jumat, 2024-01-26 18:24:37

released by SPLC about Nawaz. You can't use it in any context (other than SELFSOURCE), in any article. --Dervorguilla (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC) No....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August
Selasa, 2012-08-07 22:33:19

Attempts to puff up the SF article immediately violated WP:PROMOTION WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RS--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 11:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Yeah yeah...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 332
Sabtu, 2021-03-20 18:03:38

the CCP and adjacent institutions where its use should be limited to WP:SELFSOURCE. Though, as with all sources, WP:DUE should be considered in every use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July
Minggu, 2012-07-01 10:48:22

for player base statistics and appear to meet the requirements of WP:SELFSOURCE. Regardless of debate about the quality of the independent sources, I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 239
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:03:29

would be WP:QUESTIONABLE and might be suspected of being based on WP:SELFSOURCE material from competing claimants, and as a claim in dispute should not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 June 22
Jumat, 2021-08-06 13:06:56

Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 178
Rabu, 2022-03-16 12:33:14

"primary sources". IMO, this is a case where a primary source is fine per WP:SELFSOURCE not to mention WP:SENSE. What do you folks think? (Relevant section of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 4
Selasa, 2026-05-12 15:25:29

the institution's own website pages for individual courses, failing WP:SELFSOURCE en masse and representing exactly the kind of course-catalogue transcription...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhat Samgiita
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:30:07

Wikipedia policy regarding use of self-published material. According to WP:SELFSOURCE: "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive257
Sabtu, 2022-05-28 22:51:56

just cited as a copy of the booking report, which is an appropriate WP:SELFSOURCE. Of course, if somebody wants to use a different link to get to the booking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive209
Minggu, 2024-05-19 18:09:57

have you read it? And did you happen to read the policy just under it WP:SELFSOURCE? Serialjoepsycho (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Actually the statement...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 October 28
Jumat, 2024-11-01 15:05:05

revenue), sources published by your own organisation are acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. Anything beyond the basic facts meeting the six criteria listed at that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 337
Rabu, 2026-06-17 06:17:43

Twitter). --Frontman830 (talk) 23:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Be mindful of WP:SELFSOURCE/WP:ABOUTSELF when deciding if an individual ref is acceptable for the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive204
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 23:58:01

the material in question per my comments @ the article talkpage, and WP:SELFSOURCE to support the inclusion of the sourcing from the Ground Zero website...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 July 30
Selasa, 2025-08-05 12:59:11

website only for basic, uncontroversial biographical facts in line with WP:SELFSOURCE. I’ve removed unverifiable personal details and focused the article on...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2008 February 7
Jumat, 2025-11-21 20:44:10

now, is that the policy or not? (Britannica will sometimes essentially selfsource with a "q.v")Thanks, Rich (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Hmmm .....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:11

claim, as a lone source, so does not make the exceptions listed under WP:SELFSOURCE. Ramos1990 (talk · contribs) is insisting it is a quality source, however...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 389
Kamis, 2026-04-16 17:41:14

WP:USERGENERATED, and so inherently unreliable except for the WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SELFSOURCE criterion? I'm not sure they ever had editorial oversight. Abuse and spam...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:10:31

February 2015 (UTC) Companies may be reliable in the limited context of a WP:SELFSOURCE. Forums and wikis are not reliable in themselves. An expert statement...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive 16
Minggu, 2022-06-12 03:53:36

exceptions to this rule. If you still wish to proceed, please review WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:SOCIALMEDIA and the RfC to ensure your edit is within sourcing guidelines...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 314
Rabu, 2022-05-25 06:00:57

fusion in the garage are not), ... The full relevant guideline is at WP:SELFSOURCE." Best, w.carter-Talk 21:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC) @W.carter:, @KylieTastic:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 194
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:53:20

possible use by the news media. The relevant guideline can be found at WP:SELFSOURCE, Bananasoldier. Press releases are not independent sources and can't be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 326
Jumat, 2026-01-30 17:25:09

Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut: WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive329
Minggu, 2022-05-15 01:42:56

join the discussion at Talk:Ivy Latimer § Claims of transgenderism and SELFSOURCE. Elizium23 (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC) Vonny Sweetland (edit | talk |...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 327
Jumat, 2015-04-10 13:45:45

. I like to quote what a very experienced editor said to me about WP:SELFSOURCE when I asked the same question as a newbie: "the information must be uncontroversial...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 May 28
Sabtu, 2021-01-02 03:41:54

Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 222
Rabu, 2026-04-01 22:58:12

14:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Welcome to the Teahouse. The guidance is at WP:SELFSOURCE. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC) I submitted an article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 7
Kamis, 2024-05-23 03:59:08

should often be avoided, and in this case it should. Yes, you can WP:SELFSOURCE, but the relevance of the information (WP:ONUS) is to be decided by secondary...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 4
Kamis, 2019-01-10 11:36:29

Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 32
Sabtu, 2024-11-16 21:23:31

to address. Jokestress (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 1. Per WP:SELFSOURCE, "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:14:26

Attempts to puff up the SF article immediately violated WP:PROMOTION WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RS--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 11:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Yeah yeah...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive185
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:47:54

considered a reliable source for non-contentious biographical information (WP:SELFSOURCE). You need to establish why a People interview is any different. How is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 377
Rabu, 2025-09-03 09:29:37

questionable sources as sources on themselves[edit source] Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCE See also: Wikipedia:Verifiability § Self-published or questionable sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 207
Kamis, 2023-03-09 21:16:32

dispute before coming here? Talk:Ivy Latimer#Claims of transgenderism and SELFSOURCE How do you think we can help resolve the dispute? Suggest how to apply...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 186
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 00:24:20

whatsoever where Kate claims to have been Tom it can be used as a WP:SELFSOURCE. Rhoark (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC) We had a similar problem a couple...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 374
Minggu, 2023-03-19 23:39:23

that these are appropriate "Cultural references" examples. See also WP:SELFSOURCE. Have these stories been retold #1 by anyone other than the author #2...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive285
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:23:13

self sourcing for basic information such as birth dates is permitted WP:SELFSOURCE, and full dates are now common practice thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid editor help/Archive 1
Rabu, 2023-12-13 10:17:48

your specific concern, his website is an appropriate source as per WP:SELFSOURCE. I'm Tony Ahn (talk) 21:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC) That's true. I was just...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive221
Minggu, 2026-03-08 01:20:01

in these two cases. --kelapstick(bainuu) 13:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE, for Vitiligo, I'd say it's WP:UNDUE, but no BLP violation. It's a verified...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2019/12
Selasa, 2026-07-07 06:35:45

publicly, which was added to the article and properly sourced under WP:SELFSOURCE. As the 'controversy' has been settled and no further BLP vandalism is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive170
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:45:37

Carmen Ortiz page. This appears to be a violation of WP:UNDUE and WP:SELFSOURCE (the reference given is Torvalds' Google+ page). --Hirolovesswords (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:10:47

scientific consensus was, and that alone should be worth relegating them to wp:SELFSOURCE to back up claims that conservatives have claimed X. BrxBrx(talk)(please...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July 26
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 22:27:19

for player base statistics and appear to meet the requirements of WP:SELFSOURCE. Regardless of debate about the quality of the independent sources, I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive333
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:39:18

self-published sources for the subject is allowed within reason per WP:SELFSOURCE, reasonable people can disagree as to relevance, appropriateness, and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 52
Jumat, 2023-04-21 20:14:56

org.au The consensus was, to use a self-published source WP:SELFSOURCE for the introductory 'about themselves' para. In the second (latest revison)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creator's Choice Awards
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:58:40

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 25
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:03:44

policies/guidelines that I am aware of that seem relevant here: WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:ABOUTSELF. It would make sense if a biography were citing a facebook...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/April 2021
Jumat, 2021-04-30 23:32:41

standard for WP:RS with flying colors, as well as the lower standard at WP:SELFSOURCE for uncontroversial claims about the interview subject. Hardcore Gaming...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 113
Senin, 2026-05-04 06:35:01

fits the definition of "questionable source" that should adhere to WP:SELFSOURCE guidelines, severely limiting its use. --Kiyoweap (talk) 06:12, 10 April...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 106
Jumat, 2022-03-25 20:55:34

they are not genuine endorsements but the link offered falls foul of WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive309
Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:37:34

[31] Shakehandsman (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC) The book itself is a SELFSOURCE (since it was published by a third-party publisher, not technically a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hogwarts Legacy/archive1
Rabu, 2026-02-04 06:05:59

transgender issues respectively at WP:RSP, is broadly acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE, I feel we should be cautious in attributing labels like "non-activists"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive210
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:53:44

snippets. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, Twitter can be used if its use meets the five specified conditions. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 81
Jumat, 2023-03-03 14:54:10

used to support non-controversial, non self-serving statements (like WP:SELFSOURCE). "In describing points of view on a subject, articles should fairly represent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2015
Selasa, 2015-06-30 00:28:05

--Laser brain (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) @Laser brain: Please see WP:SELFSOURCE. I use a webpage on the Scarborough Presbyterian Church's website to cite...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive276
Kamis, 2023-02-09 17:03:33

belong to Mercer but someone else, his "brother" and therefore, per WP:SELFSOURCE is making claims about a third party, and inadmissable as a RS for Mercer's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2014
Senin, 2014-06-30 21:21:58

source? I think the source is ok. I think it falls on the line of WP:SELFSOURCE. GamerPro64 21:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC) References are otherwise generally...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 515
Selasa, 2026-07-07 06:58:08

Simonm223 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC) It is a WP:SELFSOURCE. I did not add it. If we accept WP:SELFSOURCE for claims about organization membership count...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/November 2020
Selasa, 2026-01-20 22:42:46

source for these sections). Hope this is considered acceptable, per WP:SELFSOURCE. Jheald (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Support. I think the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2017
Jumat, 2017-06-30 23:01:36

citations to Twitter but these seem to be confined to sources which meet WP:SELFSOURCE, otherwise the sources used comply with reliable sourcing. Web sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/Today
Selasa, 2026-06-16 21:44:23

page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 8
Minggu, 2026-08-09 03:11:31

page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 202
Rabu, 2026-07-08 23:57:09

does not foster cooperation at all. The policy you are looking for is WP:SELFSOURCE BTW. And this case is a grey area of that policy. While the sources in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive259
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:50:19

credibility. Also keep in mind, they are a self-published source (see WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves), they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 216
Jumat, 2022-06-24 21:39:55

sources I've included in the section meet RS standards, when considering WP:SELFSOURCE and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy#Appendix:_Reli...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 127
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:11:35

learn that there is not a blanket restriction on their use. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE says "Self-published and questionable sources may be used [emph. added...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 177
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:45:16

cover topics unrelated to it's mission, pretty much seals the deal per WP:SELFSOURCE in my opinion. Disclaimer: I am a sysop-lite on Conservapedia. Have you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 123
Minggu, 2023-02-05 03:27:53

inclusion. Relevant policies/guidelines include WP:FRINGE, WP:DUE, and WP:SELFSOURCE. VQuakr (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Re "so that they can attempt...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Files for upload/July 2017
Jumat, 2023-04-14 21:01:02

to the paper itself, which is probably a big enough claim to fail WP:SELFSOURCE. I'd be interested to hear what others think. TimothyJosephWood 12:43...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive255
Kamis, 2023-02-09 17:02:19

(talk) 17:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC) @Ronz: Yes, that would should work per WP:SELFSOURCE.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) How about using http://www...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive332
Rabu, 2025-09-24 22:19:38

19 October 2021 (UTC) Your "subject" argument conflates RSSELF with WP:SELFSOURCE. Reliable sources are independent published sources with a reputation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 28
Rabu, 2025-11-05 10:37:20

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost completely self-sourced, so WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 84
Minggu, 2022-02-27 11:11:19

for facts (numbers of institutions, etc.) that are acceptable under WP:SELFSOURCE.) Interesting that the recent storm of criticism of the article's text...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/November 2012
Sabtu, 2012-12-01 12:21:00

the information is self-submitted by the builders, it seems to meet WP:SELFSOURCE requirements. At the same time, if this is an issue, I don't think a whole...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 23
Kamis, 2026-02-12 21:12:36

Conservapedia, hereafter C, can be used as a primary source about itself, SELFSOURCE. This is quoting C in an article about C. For that argument, go to WP:RSN...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2022
Jumat, 2022-04-01 05:54:36

don't see how one source would be more reliable than the other, per WP:SELFSOURCE, and Kirby confirmed that this is his YouTube channel throughout various...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 47
Minggu, 2023-05-14 21:15:14

two months, these Wiki pages are filled with wrong,misleading,outdated,selfsourced information from these business schools. As i expreseed concerns with...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists - sourcing requirements
Kamis, 2026-04-30 07:28:25

Using non-independent sources for this purpose is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. I still hold this opinion. There's no policy evidence that these lists...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 15
Kamis, 2025-10-23 12:12:16

issue. Also with regards to sourcing of certain statements I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies here. I think mentioning the ban is entirely reasonable as long...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 120
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 22:41:20

talk:Martin Bina and Talk:Vancouver FC, particularly regarding NPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE, the editor continues to use that website as a source, including today:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 188
Minggu, 2024-01-07 20:45:01

discussion elsewhere. Please see: Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Merge WP:SELFSOURCE to WP:ABOUTSELF. Summary: a fairly complicated section in the WP:RS guideline...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Source assessment/Rick Devens
Selasa, 2026-07-28 11:32:46

self-published user-generated source; subject to WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:SELFSOURCE ~ Dunno which Instagram post, frankly, but this is still Devens's account...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 74
Sabtu, 2024-01-20 01:35:58

independent of the subject is a concern, this must be contrasted with WP:SELFSOURCE) and there is also coverage in secondary sources. I do see several independent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 189
Kamis, 2024-07-25 13:14:03

merge 3. For a while now, we've been talking about how to merge WP:SELFSOURCE (in WP:RS) and WP:BLPSELFPUB in (WP:BLP) to WP:ABOUTSELF (in WP:V), since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 March 9
Sabtu, 2023-03-18 00:05:10

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article is almost entirely WP:SELFSOURCE and makes no attempt to establish notability and instead simply lists...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 1
Selasa, 2025-06-10 10:25:45

and cannot support controversial points, but it's still usable under WP:SELFSOURCE for the basic facts of Barrow's birth and education and I've restored...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Grey Literature
Selasa, 2024-12-31 10:48:11

addition to BLPSPS (because he and others had been talking about merging WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:BLPSELFPUB to WP:ABOUTSELF), he said "Given the level of nit-picking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 181
Sabtu, 2023-08-05 10:11:33

inspired by Him, that this is what happened. So we're dealing with a WP:SELFSOURCE issue, and surely saying that one created the horse is a boastful claim...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1180
Senin, 2026-08-03 20:41:43

interesting questions! Number 1 certainly seems interesting. It's partially WP:SELFSOURCE because it's published by the subject of the article, even though the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 20
Senin, 2025-04-28 23:05:29

out of 10 sources come from Telegram, which could violate WP:UGC or WP:SELFSOURCE, and all sources date back to December 2024, making it outdated in regards...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists 2
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:59

Using non-independent sources for this purpose is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. Of course, if independent sources exist, even better. Just cite everything...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 94
Jumat, 2026-05-01 22:08:43

concerned about is the school's own website, which is allowable per WP:SELFSOURCE as the source is supporting everyday information about itself, such as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 442
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:13:37

Wikipedia taking action. The ultimate guidance on this comes from WP:SELFSOURCE. While often times there is a due weight question regarding covering our...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 431
Selasa, 2024-05-21 08:58:43

currently already does this. Friedbyrd (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE we would have to fully include his narrative and only his narrative, which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398
Selasa, 2026-04-28 01:29:15

non-contentious statements about itself (not other people or groups) per WP:SELFSOURCE. If you wish to write an original composition outside of Wikipedia, elevating...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 493
Selasa, 2025-11-11 00:33:34

should not be used when it makes claims about third parties as per WP:SELFSOURCE. Andwats (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC) If the decision here is GUNREL...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 519
Jumat, 2026-07-24 00:59:27

disambiguation, but no longer use it in the body using WP:VENDOR and WP:SELFSOURCE in article naming context using WP:USERGENERATED content in support of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407
Rabu, 2026-01-07 00:07:29

mailing list post to cite the certification by FSF is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE since the X200 is otherwise discussed there? It probably should be cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 415
Rabu, 2026-06-17 06:14:18

Xx236 (talk) 13:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Yes, the problem with using SELFSOURCE isn't as much reliability as due weight (with the caveat that Xx236 mentions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 1
Minggu, 2023-09-10 13:46:43

again, we are dependent on what reliable independent sources say; per WP:SELFSOURCE, primary sources are only used for self-descriptive information such as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 190
Kamis, 2026-03-26 12:09:49

(UTC) WP:BIASED might cover this if its written in a certain way or WP:SELFSOURCE might cover this as well, but once again it would depend on how it's written...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 12
Kamis, 2026-05-21 04:44:26

1 and 3 are archived pages from the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a DGS approved institutes list, a directory entry excluded...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 6
Sabtu, 2026-02-14 09:39:11

scale to address errors of fact might be just about "OK" (relative to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF), basing an entire article on such sources is highly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 11
Selasa, 2026-05-19 20:24:59

WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering an accreditation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 28
Sabtu, 2023-08-05 09:34:11

whose only sources are IMDb and a dead link (presumably used to be a WP:SELFSOURCE). Copious tone and copyediting issues. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:45, 21 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 30
Sabtu, 2023-12-09 22:32:16

found through research) seeming to violate WP:COI, if not directly WP:SELFSOURCE. For those sources for which I was not able to find direct evidence of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive348
Senin, 2024-12-23 10:03:04

said something about himself on the web or article somewhere, see WP:SELFSOURCE. For images though you can put up a picture which is your work or for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 9
Sabtu, 2026-07-18 00:51:54

see WP:RS for what we consider for reliable sources. Specifically, WP:SELFSOURCE says using sources published by the group the article is about can be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/AI images
Minggu, 2026-04-26 06:44:57

personal emblem of this BLP", which presumably would be verified as a WP:SELFSOURCE, thus an exception to the ban. 2. Same idea. If this is the actual logo...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 242
Rabu, 2024-03-20 01:50:48

coverage of both sides. In general, I propose broader use of WP:CS and WP:SELFSOURCE in this article, because it's simply impossible to cover everything by...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 August 28
Sabtu, 2025-09-06 21:18:26

that they are fandom-style blogs run by specific groups. According to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERGENERATED, such fansites are generally not acceptable as sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 204
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 21:05:51

them). WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC) I think that WP:SELFSOURCE guides us in another direction on anything that might be considered boastful...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1274
Selasa, 2026-07-21 08:51:46

Jabba550  ✉ Talk to me :D 12:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC) Hi @Jabba550! WP:SELFSOURCE says that self-published sources may be used for information about itself...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 79
Senin, 2026-03-02 20:37:48

policies? Vastmajority20025 (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC) See WP:SELFSOURCE. ArthurPlummer ( :) | talk | contribs) 21:58, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Yyou...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1209
Rabu, 2023-12-27 01:27:22

but many of them I've seen are fleshed out with WP:RSSELF, WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE. How is significant coverage determined? I've found the below as guidance...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 20
Kamis, 2026-05-28 22:41:36

and 8 are archived pages from the institution's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is the World Buildings Directory, an architectural catalogue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 5
Jumat, 2023-10-13 12:39:20

হানিফ আলী (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Indicate WP:UGC , WP:SELFSOURCE. not notable till now Worldiswide (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Where...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1181
Rabu, 2026-04-01 22:38:11

sources -Bad At This (yell at me) 15:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Yep! WP:SELFSOURCE SpookyTwenty (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Sorry! This is my first...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1256
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:51:13

website, which described his citizenship status and identity. Per [WP:SELFSOURCE], self-published sources should not be used to support material about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2024
Rabu, 2024-06-26 23:01:27

reactions, but I've left the references to the disinformation websites as WP:SELFSOURCE. Now that it's in the article, I think those sentences provide valuable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/May 2024
Rabu, 2026-04-08 06:18:51

general sense, and if followed literally would invalidate WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc. In this specific context, I don't think it's a problem to use a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2026
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 20:50:29

transgender issues respectively at WP:RSP, is broadly acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE, I feel we should be cautious in attributing labels like "non-activists"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1200
Jumat, 2025-10-10 21:57:40

talk:Martin Bina and Talk:Vancouver FC, particularly regarding NPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE, the editor continues to use that website as a source, including today:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1187
Jumat, 2025-07-18 06:42:27

as I see a lot of reversions such basic information for no reason. WP:SELFSOURCE Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works#For claims about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 August 3
Selasa, 2026-08-04 07:14:55

it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 240
Jumat, 2024-01-05 01:18:00

"Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves" (WP:SELFSOURCE) of our WP:RS guideline: "Self-published or questionable sources may be...

Click to read more »