Search Results: Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Sabtu, 2026-08-01 03:25:26particular, a wikilink is not a reliable source. Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talalima Mobley
Senin, 2025-12-01 13:27:58webhost. Kleuske (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Further research... WP:SELFSOURCE States the following: Self-published or questionable sources may be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Marxist Tendency (Canada)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 01:59:4401:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:SELFSOURCE NegroLeagueHistorian (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete: SELFSOURCE allows a primary source to be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen 'Alik Shahadah
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:06:29See WP:SELFSOURCE FN8. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN9. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN10. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN11....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Breedlove
Selasa, 2025-12-16 11:07:02free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost all sources are WP:SELFSOURCE. No reliable sources to justify inclusion in Wikipedia UtoD 12:51, 8 December...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refinery CMS (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-10-31 11:29:12WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost completely self-sourced, so WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMC Electronic Technical School
Rabu, 2025-12-10 05:35:29The Banner talk 20:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Do you admit to ignoring WP:SELFSOURCE ? Jzsj (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Remember this one:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/June 2021
Kamis, 2021-07-08 07:49:44Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2021 June 2 Search Box C++ strings SELFSOURCE and social media services that force you to log in before viewing posts...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inja (band)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 08:41:59FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBAND, only sources are WP:UGC / WP:SPS / WP:SELFSOURCE that do not establish notability Leijurv (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2020...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Grandmothers
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 08:47:136 July 2016 (UTC) Comment Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG, and WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Again...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tomkins
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:54:59WP:SPORT, and the sole source is far from WP:RELIABLE since it is a WP:SELFSOURCE. — Jkudlick tcs 05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - the appeal of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Potts (artist) (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-12-09 12:01:23images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:SELFSOURCE, 2nd nomination (1st nomination result was delete), notability tag since...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:53:25FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A {{third-party}} tag was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gernot Wagner
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 04:01:08Also: [2] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifehouse International Church Taipei
Jumat, 2025-11-14 09:07:06independent references. Jlicy (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE information from this article can be used as sources in the merged to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metroland Media Group
Selasa, 2025-11-18 04:35:49images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NCORP, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:SELFSOURCE — Articles primary editors are IPs, Flyerland (talk · contribs),...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Paulo Nunes
Senin, 2025-11-17 20:47:27the reliablity. Apart from this, such sources can be considered as WP:SELFSOURCE , that can be only used for the information about subject, not as a reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Knapp (4th nomination)
Kamis, 2025-10-23 08:28:44issue. Also with regards to sourcing of certain statements I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies here. I think mentioning the ban is entirely reasonable as long...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Fowlie
Senin, 2025-12-01 04:55:22which is used to cite Fowlie's hometown, an acceptable practice per WP:SELFSOURCE.— TAnthonyTalk 22:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC) KEEP - As the creator of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Kovacs
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 05:02:30myspace and fansite pages which are not considered reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERG). Did not find anything notable in google books etc. -Wikishagnik...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Johnson College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:02:11college's own prospectus, a primary self-published source that fails both WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:INDEPENDENT. These are the only two references in the article,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohimai Godwin Amaize (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 19:23:19information is being sourced from the biographee they are often classed with WP:SELFSOURCE. See the essay at WP:Interviews. In this instance it appears that they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Aizawl College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:01:09coverage exists. Reference 1 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a Vanglaini enrolment notice covering multiple colleges...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thor Robotics unmanned vehicles
Kamis, 2025-12-18 01:59:20images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article is almost entirely WP:SELFSOURCE and makes no attempt to establish notability and instead simply lists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Aizawl West College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:54:47WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering a building inauguration...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wodzionka (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-03 08:23:13self-published book detailing a day's ration in Auschwitz I think the WP:SELFSOURCE exception applies in this instance. I also found a German-language source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Saiha College
Senin, 2026-05-11 18:39:22References 2, 3, and 4 are all the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE, and reference 3 is additionally a dead link. Every factual claim in the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Vitenas
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:55:19questionable (self)sources. Awards are from a local webzine (H Texas). Per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ADMASK. Ben Ben (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Kolasib College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:02:28References 3, 4, and 5 are the college's own website pages, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 6 is a Vanglaini item titled "Kolasib College-a project pahnih...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotbow
Selasa, 2022-02-15 16:20:54Searched for independent reliable sources and found none. Just UGC and SELFSOURCE. The buzzfile source only demonstrates that the company exists, but does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:53:28JSTOR · TWL) The article is was supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A third-party was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Mizoram Law College
Senin, 2026-05-11 13:45:00WP:INDEPENDENT. Reference 3 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Being the sole law college in Mizoram does not confer notability. If...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Belize/Guidance/sources
Kamis, 2025-08-07 08:55:28difficult to discover and archive; allowed use in very few cases (see WP:SELFSOURCE). For instance, misspelt names, rounded dates or dates off by a few days...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government J. Buana College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 10:01:25tehsil population page and the college's own website, both failing WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:INDEPENDENT. The article exhibits clear markers of LLM generation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inderprastha Dental College
Jumat, 2026-07-17 05:40:34see WP:RS for what we consider for reliable sources. Specifically, WP:SELFSOURCE says using sources published by the group the article is about can be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolani Maritime Institute
Rabu, 2026-05-20 13:25:081 and 3 are archived pages from the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a DGS approved institutes list, a directory entry excluded...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Qarqozak Bridge and Tishreen Dam
Senin, 2025-04-28 06:58:40out of 10 sources come from Telegram, which could violate WP:UGC or WP:SELFSOURCE, and all sources date back to December 2024, making it outdated in regards...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartke Systems
Selasa, 2025-11-04 21:20:252025 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV also there is a lot of WP:SELFSOURCE on the page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 18:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Delete Agree...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Champhai College
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:54:32excluded by WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a Vanglaini notice of a language course opening, not coverage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Harner
Selasa, 2025-11-18 04:46:39the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a WP:SELFSOURCE and/or WP:NPOV issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:07:30that out for consideration. It can't sustain an article alone per WP:SELFSOURCE#5, though. I'll likely recommend a redirect to Judge Dredd: The Mega Collection...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Peace Before 2021
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:45:08being just that, WP:GNG for coverage, WP:RELIABLE for reliability, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc, etc =/ Ren99 (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Adventure Time/archive2
Minggu, 2023-02-19 09:31:00citations to Twitter but these seem to be confined to sources which meet WP:SELFSOURCE, otherwise the sources used comply with reliable sourcing. Web sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Madani Miya Ashrafi al-Jilani
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:08:07whatever they want about the figure, which seems to create an issue with WP:SELFSOURCE. Regarding the videos and blogs, it's all self published and anyone can...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GolfScript
Senin, 2025-11-17 13:59:46however, they can be used as "reliable" sources about themselves (per WP:SELFSOURCE). In this case, the claim being made (i.e. that GolfScript is widely used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justice for women, Bangladesh - JFWBD
Senin, 2025-12-01 05:22:35I have a tendency to stay away from Facebook as a WP:RS as it is a WP:SELFSOURCE, but it might point a way to some other areas that could be used. - Pmedema...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xahid Khan
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:39:10হানিফ আলী (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Indicate WP:UGC , WP:SELFSOURCE. not notable till now Worldiswide (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Where...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael John U. Teh
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 05:38:1321:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC) I believe the appropriate subsection is WP:SELFSOURCE. –HTD 05:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Oppose as there are no sources outside...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Hrangbana College
Selasa, 2026-05-19 05:15:27WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering an accreditation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Brewer
Selasa, 2025-12-16 11:57:20blog should be an okay source for the bibliography as indicated in WP:SELFSOURCE, but I see your point about the blog interview. I do have sources for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The NeuroGenderings Network
Selasa, 2025-12-09 16:00:55mentioned WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE as "violations" as it does not meet Wikipedia’s standard of verifiability. Actually, WP:SELFSOURCE (which is an exception...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amicism
Selasa, 2025-12-09 05:34:17FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable in-universe cruft. All sources are WP:SELFSOURCED Wikias. — IVORK Discuss 03:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Automated comment:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 March 14
Minggu, 2023-03-26 02:14:08reliable sources. AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE allows self published sources in some cases. If the article is about the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Bhattacharya
Minggu, 2025-11-30 20:43:52WP:PRODBLP twice and tried to explain to the user that Twitter is WP:SELFSOURCED to no avail evidently. Arguably comes under WP:A7 in it's current form...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Security College
Selasa, 2025-12-16 09:22:03herring. It is not creator states it is valid: it is our guideline WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a blog owned by article subject is WP:RS for neutral factual info...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2021 June 2
Kamis, 2021-06-10 09:05:05that this is a disservice to readers - if they want to follow up on a SELFSOURCE claim, they will have to jump through a number of hoops to get to the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samundra Institute of Maritime Studies
Rabu, 2026-05-27 22:49:52and 8 are archived pages from the institution's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is the World Buildings Directory, an architectural catalogue...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Hunter Abramson
Selasa, 2026-01-20 16:36:05August 2017 (UTC) I removed the blog references, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, sources from the subject themselves are allowed for claims that are not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Royal Grammar School, Guildford/1
Selasa, 2026-04-14 06:05:01concerned about is the school's own website, which is allowable per WP:SELFSOURCE as the source is supporting everyday information about itself, such as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinna (art director)
Jumat, 2025-12-19 01:30:50whose only sources are IMDb and a dead link (presumably used to be a WP:SELFSOURCE). Copious tone and copyediting issues. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:45, 21 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral yoga (Satchidananda)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 01:52:24importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published! Shrikanthv...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prey (software)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 02:49:472012 (UTC) Responsive to Northamerica1000, Procedural Keep: WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves “Self-published …...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euphorics Id
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 21:14:57article. How does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker benedict
Senin, 2025-12-01 14:33:47I'd specifically direct you to sections like WP:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFSOURCE as well as of course WP:COI. Editors are strongly discouraged when it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Dodgeball League
Sabtu, 2026-02-14 07:19:02scale to address errors of fact might be just about "OK" (relative to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF), basing an entire article on such sources is highly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro Tech Maritime Academy
Selasa, 2026-05-12 08:48:39the institution's own website pages for individual courses, failing WP:SELFSOURCE en masse and representing exactly the kind of course-catalogue transcription...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fit-Boy
Senin, 2025-11-17 11:55:46(from public cyber) 11:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Jim Carter: Check WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a film is not independent of itself but it is one of those instances...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 8
Minggu, 2018-10-14 08:37:44reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)" Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC) CASSIOPEIA (Not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apogee Stadium/archive1
Senin, 2025-09-08 08:26:57the information is self-submitted by the builders, it seems to meet WP:SELFSOURCE requirements. At the same time, if this is an issue, I don't think a whole...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversion Hub (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:19:35WP:CORPDEPTH. Secondly, the additional references are in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE. I don't fell that any of the points made in these references make the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morvarid Karimi
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:42:58not writing about the subject itself, and in any event would be a WP:SELFSOURCE even if it were to contain tangential information on the subject. WP:PROF...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Sleep Apnea Database
Senin, 2025-11-17 10:57:35caution those who may wish to remove certain citations, that under WP:SELFSOURCE, non-contentious information that is not unduly self-serving MAY be supplied...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of device tracking software
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 21:18:08must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources …. WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves Self-published...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bianchi
Senin, 2025-12-01 08:16:44sources for awards are not reliable because they are self-published (see WP:SELFSOURCE) ignores the meaning of "self", in this case. The National Sportscasters...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Raymond D. Tarbuck/1
Sabtu, 2023-12-09 02:53:04independent of the subject is a concern, this must be contrasted with WP:SELFSOURCE) and there is also coverage in secondary sources. I do see several independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:49:45also said is not necessary per WP:SELFSOURCE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Necrothesp, WP:SELFSOURCE is in fact the reason that I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/Robert Garran/archive1
Minggu, 2020-08-02 07:15:37still some self sources, these appear to me to be consistent with WP:SELFSOURCE, being either about Garran or identified as direct quotes by Garran about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Accolade (company)/archive1
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 04:03:03standard for WP:RS with flying colors, as well as the lower standard at WP:SELFSOURCE for uncontroversial claims about the interview subject. Hardcore Gaming...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui
Sabtu, 2025-09-06 21:09:49that they are fandom-style blogs run by specific groups. According to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERGENERATED, such fansites are generally not acceptable as sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barlowe's Guide to Fantasy
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:07:532018 (UTC) I know the ad was unorthodox, but doesn't it qualify as WP:SELFSOURCE? Many articles on books include them being selected for some "Book of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Barrow
Senin, 2025-06-09 05:45:39and cannot support controversial points, but it's still usable under WP:SELFSOURCE for the basic facts of Barrow's birth and education and I've restored...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samizdat: And Other Issues Regarding the 'Source' of Open Source Code
Selasa, 2025-11-18 15:05:31source of information about Dennis Ritchie, in an article about him (WP:SELFSOURCE). Although inline references are preferable, there is no requirement saying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SndControl
Minggu, 2025-11-16 00:39:58meets the guidelines. In regards to citing self-published articles WP:SELFSOURCE, nothing here is unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim, it does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Meir
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:42:12found through research) seeming to violate WP:COI, if not directly WP:SELFSOURCE. For those sources for which I was not able to find direct evidence of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cedric Tylleman
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 13:03:45(talk) No one is disputing FB as an acceptable External link, but per WP:SELFSOURCE it should not be used as a source if it is unduly self-serving. I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2012 June 19
Jumat, 2023-01-20 00:09:42sources due to the language here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE There is multiple sources for this wiki if the site itself is counted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 August 21
Minggu, 2020-10-25 06:46:28on themselves" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE&redirect=yes) and if not how can this article be improved considering...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReVanced
Jumat, 2025-12-19 08:46:30again, we are dependent on what reliable independent sources say; per WP:SELFSOURCE, primary sources are only used for self-descriptive information such as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 February 5
Jumat, 2022-03-18 17:16:02or non-reliable, sources for notability purposes are WP:SELFPUB and WP:SELFSOURCE, which clearly show that they cannot be used to establish notability....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Toon Disney
Selasa, 2025-11-18 01:16:28would be more useful. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, self-published sources can be used for the purposes of verification for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Society of Military Comptrollers
Minggu, 2025-11-16 21:58:12the five sections in the article. Finally, according to Wikipedia (WP:SELFSOURCE), self-published sources (like the ASMC web-site) may be used for information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington University Emergency Support Team
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:34:32interpreted. The basic argument here is OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST smooshed with SELFSOURCED. That's really not a sufficient reason to blow up a competent, verifiable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 118
Jumat, 2023-03-24 20:05:44(UTC) Conservapedia is generally regarded as an unreliable source. WP:SELFSOURCE says that Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Belize/Guidance
Rabu, 2025-08-06 17:23:57difficult to discover and archive; allowed use in very few cases (see WP:SELFSOURCE). For instance, misspelt names, rounded dates or dates off by a few days...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 November 6
Sabtu, 2018-11-10 08:49:15November 2018 (UTC) @Dbfirs: I have done citations much, but I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies. RudolfRed (talk) 20:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC) Ah, yes, this is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:28:24See WP:SELFSOURCE FN8. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN9. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN10. an article by him, See WP:SELFSOURCE FN11....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 27
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:13:38webhost. Kleuske (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Further research... WP:SELFSOURCE States the following: Self-published or questionable sources may be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MauBank WithMe
Jumat, 2025-12-12 12:19:57something other than himself, which doesn't meet the standards for WP:SELFSOURCE). [5] This seems to be some sort of user-generated profile about the bank...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive446
Kamis, 2022-02-03 09:53:32certain situation, which is exactly what I did here. You can check WP:SELFSOURCE for more information. If u still disagree with me. I am happy to take...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:11:41in an article about himself? It seems to meet all the criteria for WP:SELFSOURCE, being that he is the source, he is talking about himself and not any...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 August 10
Kamis, 2023-08-17 14:57:52quotation? Indiana6724 (talk) 09:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Check Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE which explains when you can cite Twitter (or other social media accounts)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Christian Church (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-10 07:05:06wikiGnomes still rejected the page with no objection to the Icoc page's 80+ selfsourced links. Same for the Kip McKean page; it is 95% self sourced. If a pile...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conica AG
Selasa, 2025-12-16 03:23:21non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is basically not all...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Minggu, 2026-08-09 04:34:35certainly not the same as writing the bulk of our articles. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE states the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive754
Kamis, 2026-07-09 06:14:303 June 2012 (UTC) note timestamp. notation added by Ohiostandard. WP:SELFSOURCE. Also deleted was proof that the "stories" the fake newspaper was reporting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:45:57it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive244
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:50:40warned by two different editors that his source could not be used (per WP:SELFSOURCE), but he just ignored them. Coltsfan (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Previous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 20:30:16page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers
Minggu, 2026-08-09 01:30:41it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive267
Senin, 2026-02-23 15:19:43seems a fairly straightforward understanding of WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE. Given you need to show the closure to be unreasonable understanding of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:30:19it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive139
Senin, 2025-08-18 05:07:43majority of cases, these advocacy organizations were not being used as WP:SELFSOURCE but as sources for factual assertions. This is quite problematic. I apologize...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patty Walters
Jumat, 2025-11-14 20:47:39article, though they are not preferred, are considered valid sources per WP:SELFSOURCE, and are used only for things such as his full name, birth date, and quotations...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Revenge (band)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 01:55:11in this article is permissible because it meets criteria 1-5 under WP:SELFSOURCE. Roshanbo (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Delete: Allmusic seems to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 153
Senin, 2022-05-09 23:01:27any neutral sources, so wikipedians erroneously categorize that as WP:SELFSOURCE. Since wikipedia gets hailed as the only necessary tertiary source, tertiary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1045
Rabu, 2025-09-24 20:45:24asserted that the Daily Mail fails WP:RS but there is an exception for WP:SELFSOURCE which would seem to apply. Furthermore, links to the Daily Mail are not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:XfD today
Rabu, 2026-06-17 18:08:05page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 December 27
Senin, 2022-03-07 00:24:29former player and it is the only available source. See also WP:SPS and WP:SELFSOURCE. Eagleash (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC) please change the DOB of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive930
Rabu, 2026-03-11 04:36:52John from Idegon (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC) @John from Idegon: WP:SELFSOURCE. Xboxmanwar (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2016 (UTC) I am at a loss as to how...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive681
Jumat, 2025-10-17 04:18:36User:Alvez3 made this posting on my Talk page which IMHO is an unprovoked/unjustified personal attack . He/she changed some long-standing text (in place...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive742
Senin, 2024-01-22 04:08:26under WP:N. And I've read WP:RS many times, and this source fulfills WP:SELFSOURCE. It is also *self evident* that the best source for a statement that X...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284
Minggu, 2026-02-22 08:25:23informal rule; if it's Saudi-controlled, don't use it for anything except WP:SELFSOURCE. HLHJ (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC) I would vote support for your...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093
Jumat, 2023-04-21 16:36:01of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided." and WP:SELFSOURCE says to be careful with self-published sources when they are self-serving...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive910
Sabtu, 2026-07-11 09:05:27he thinks Facebook, Twitter, etc., are unreliable, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, that premise is wrong. Like I said, tried to address that, ignored it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1053
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:24:46I believe this is the same IP who reported me at ANI, which was a failure, but that is besides the point. I would like to focus on the personal attacks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 August 17
Senin, 2023-02-27 21:26:59with using something selfpublished (like Facebook or Twitter) per WP:SELFSOURCE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC) In the Dragon boat...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive897
Selasa, 2023-02-14 07:59:27interview as specific example, which is a 3rd party source. Also, as per WP:SELFSOURCE we should agree on how to include the TeI publications and bring back...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive283
Sabtu, 2026-07-04 19:14:54how this gossip blog is a reliable source for anything other than WP:SELFSOURCE purposes? Is this website family the kind of source upon which Britannica...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1025
Minggu, 2024-11-17 13:53:03think we are confusing two issues here. The first is the amount of WP:SELFSOURCE material that is appropriate and for which facts it is appropriate. The...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive993
Sabtu, 2025-07-19 03:09:26Shevinsky on what she considers herself. That all seem to fall within WP:SELFSOURCE of which Breitbart is still valid for. And yet none of these can be added...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1068
Selasa, 2026-06-09 06:32:06Indeed in the diffs, some of these references were used in an explicitly SELFSOURCE context. I'd suggest that Amigao could benefit from taking some due care...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1003
Selasa, 2026-03-24 16:29:39archives where I tried to explain to you under what circumstances WP:SELFSOURCE can be used, and also see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The 2019 Venezuelan presidential...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive208
Minggu, 2025-08-17 00:06:16with any evidence. I did, and still do, disagree with JzG's read of WP:SELFSOURCE, and I fully admit to adding self sourced cites to the article in question...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive951
Jumat, 2024-10-18 02:49:10reliably sourced, and the part he was adding I would call, at best, a WP:SELFSOURCE that could only apply to statements about themselves. That said, I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive123
Kamis, 2026-07-09 00:52:04sumgait.info, budapest.sumgait.info, unverifiable rating site seem to be WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:PRIMARY, and do not meet the notability, verifiability and reliability...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive116
Minggu, 2025-08-17 06:06:10assertion that rulings by Bishops or the Vatican are mere opinions or WP:SELFSOURCE is naked POV; they have the rule of law, but are arcane and of little...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Awards
Rabu, 2026-08-05 21:11:44it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elliott Fitch Shepard/archive2
Selasa, 2026-01-20 19:57:20--Laser brain (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) @Laser brain: Please see WP:SELFSOURCE. I use a webpage on the Scarborough Presbyterian Church's website to cite...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 198
Sabtu, 2023-07-29 00:46:52fails WP:SELFSOURCE -- LinkedIn pages generally fail WP:RS and therefore can only be used for the very very narrow exceptions WP:SELFSOURCE defines, which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian theory of Shakespeare authorship
Kamis, 2025-12-11 14:55:00sources (i.e. they meet WP:RS by complying with the guidelines in WP:SELFSOURCE). The sourcing is a little bit weak in places, but not because of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolla
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 23:57:43(Self-published information is not denied by Wikipedia policy per se, see e.g. WP:SELFSOURCE.) --TuukkaH (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC) There is not much information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 123
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 22:57:13I'm currently thinking about are both pretty much conflict-free). WP:SELFSOURCE is a decent start, but I'm not sure if it's sufficient to allow removal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:09:03mentioned WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE as "violations" as it does not meet Wikipedia’s standard of verifiability. Actually, WP:SELFSOURCE (which is an exception...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayden Boche
Rabu, 2025-12-10 08:05:30recording artists may be used as sources of information about themselves WP:SELFSOURCE, especially in the context of news-related articles with no reasonable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 February 18
Senin, 2022-03-28 11:42:39postings could be used as sources of information about themselves. WP:SELFSOURCE. This should only be used in exceptional circumstances, best to find a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 172
Kamis, 2025-11-13 18:28:18third party and I think it's a good start. However, I came across WP:SELFSOURCE, which seems to suggest that I could use a YouTube video of the subject...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 160
Rabu, 2021-09-22 07:12:09in our article on Headlines. It would be like using a WP:PRIMARY or WP:SELFSOURCE with a secondary source to demonstrate notability. Of course none of this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (all)
Sabtu, 2022-06-11 18:09:49certainly not the same as writing the bulk of our articles. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE states the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132
Sabtu, 2022-06-04 18:55:22uninvolved comment from editors with expertise on WP:RS. Controversy over WP:SELFSOURCE and probably untrue WP:BLP material being added to [Article]Sandra Fluke...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural Marxism (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-11-17 06:24:44publication found it fit to publish. That makes it not a WP:RS. Please see WP:SELFSOURCED. Otherwise, every university student's term paper could be considered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 120
Minggu, 2026-07-05 20:43:43It's all explained in Questionable and self-published sources, see WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF in particular. As an encyclopedia we are interested in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 30
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:21:05The Banner talk 20:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Do you admit to ignoring WP:SELFSOURCE ? Jzsj (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC) Remember this one:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Geocodes
Jumat, 2025-11-28 02:13:43WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE. Some of them are a bit lazily implemented like citation #19 for the open...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Robert Jacomb-Hood/archive1
Senin, 2026-03-30 17:55:49can't even do my own research / write my own biography per Wikipedia:SELFSOURCE) is a bit demoralising. I gather there is no biography written about RJH...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Massachusetts Institute of Technology fraternities, sororities, and ILGs
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:18:39them. I was careful not to use "self-published" books, but did see WP:SELFSOURCE, and think my references pass the 5-point sniff test therein. Some famous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace Baker
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 19:35:36questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:10:25article. How does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 30
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:50:0101:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:SELFSOURCE NegroLeagueHistorian (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Delete: SELFSOURCE allows a primary source to be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 11
Minggu, 2022-05-15 01:12:14a reliable source per WP:UGC, they are sometimes appropriate under WP:SELFSOURCE. I agree that tweets are cited far too often in Wikipedia. But I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super-Duper Missile
Jumat, 2025-12-12 17:29:29know better than this. Any experienced editor should know that per WP:SELFSOURCE "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242
Minggu, 2025-02-23 22:12:11sites that are considered WP:RS Are non-contentious facts based on WP:SELFSOURCE considered reliable? For the first point, some of the major sites reporting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 17
Minggu, 2020-11-29 01:31:12also said is not necessary per WP:SELFSOURCE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Necrothesp, WP:SELFSOURCE is in fact the reason that I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:56:20in this article is permissible because it meets criteria 1-5 under WP:SELFSOURCE. Roshanbo (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Delete: Allmusic seems to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 310
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:43(UTC) Comment: The policies/guidelines in play are WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:BLPSOURCES, and WP:CHALLENGE. Yesterday, I laid out my case in detail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 289
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:14:21Gerard (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC) The bios would fall under WP:SELFSOURCE or WP:BLPSELFPUB. Atsme Talk 📧 14:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Prose, unless...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:42:57myspace and fansite pages which are not considered reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERG). Did not find anything notable in google books etc. -Wikishagnik...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1072
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 05:30:14a few things, it is okay, as long as it is kept to a minimum. See WP:SELFSOURCE RudolfRed (talk) 01:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC) Hi, Michie740, I assume the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anachronox/archive1
Minggu, 2023-03-26 00:44:36source? I think the source is ok. I think it falls on the line of WP:SELFSOURCE. GamerPro64 21:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC) References are otherwise generally...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Istituto San Leone Magno
Jumat, 2025-12-12 08:52:20exceptional claim(s)" should have been deleted from the article, as per WP:SELFSOURCE Jzsj (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Nope. Otherwise I wouldn't have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 21
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:49:412014 (UTC) See Talk:List_of_notable_Ice_Bucket_Challenge_participants#WP:SELFSOURCE.3F. You need to stop removing references to the official YouTube and Facebook...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:51:19the five sections in the article. Finally, according to Wikipedia (WP:SELFSOURCE), self-published sources (like the ASMC web-site) may be used for information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 3
Selasa, 2022-07-26 04:48:51blog should be an okay source for the bibliography as indicated in WP:SELFSOURCE, but I see your point about the blog interview. I do have sources for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 3
Senin, 2020-09-07 17:11:01Searched for independent reliable sources and found none. Just UGC and SELFSOURCE. The buzzfile source only demonstrates that the company exists, but does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:20:44self-published book detailing a day's ration in Auschwitz I think the WP:SELFSOURCE exception applies in this instance. I also found a German-language source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 54
Kamis, 2025-10-16 10:58:39of these articles (1%), cleaned up eight, and in addition to a valid SelfSource RS I found businesses, universities, local governments, and national government...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 29
Rabu, 2022-06-08 17:17:46herring. It is not creator states it is valid: it is our guideline WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a blog owned by article subject is WP:RS for neutral factual info...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:38:29I'd specifically direct you to sections like WP:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFSOURCE as well as of course WP:COI. Editors are strongly discouraged when it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:11:24publication found it fit to publish. That makes it not a WP:RS. Please see WP:SELFSOURCED. Otherwise, every university student's term paper could be considered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Board and table games/Sources
Senin, 2026-03-23 07:01:09Parlett's site are promotional, so are not reliable beyond the limits of WP:SELFSOURCE. Polygon Board game + Video game news and review articles Polygon is considered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1063
Minggu, 2025-08-17 01:44:46things for which it can be used are quite narrow. See WP:USERG and WP:SELFSOURCE S Philbrick(Talk) 18:11, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Thank you. How do I go about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 210
Rabu, 2026-06-17 07:02:08Atsme📞📧 14:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC) There's a general guideline at WP:SELFSOURCE, might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:11:19source of information about Dennis Ritchie, in an article about him (WP:SELFSOURCE). Although inline references are preferable, there is no requirement saying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 20
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:50:52know better than this. Any experienced editor should know that per WP:SELFSOURCE "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 157
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:44for uncontentious biographical information from interviews, as per WP:SELFSOURCE, and possibly for other information relevant to People as per Context...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:47:37Unreliable according to Examplo347, but that is not in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE, which even explicitly mentions Facebook. The source is only used to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Zirin
Rabu, 2025-12-03 05:48:29self-published by the subject can be used sparingly per WP:PRIMARY, WP:BIASED, WP:SELFSOURCE. Zirin is by no means the most notable lawyer or writer in New York, but...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 14
Sabtu, 2022-07-23 01:30:32non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is basically not all...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:55:46questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCEWP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 8
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:03:36however, they can be used as "reliable" sources about themselves (per WP:SELFSOURCE). In this case, the claim being made (i.e. that GolfScript is widely used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:54:34caution those who may wish to remove certain citations, that under WP:SELFSOURCE, non-contentious information that is not unduly self-serving MAY be supplied...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:48:02then have a cast-iron source (not third-party but, I think, fine by WP:SELFSOURCE) and the criterion for including a sub-list on the page would be that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:44:35sources for awards are not reliable because they are self-published (see WP:SELFSOURCE) ignores the meaning of "self", in this case. The National Sportscasters...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:16:052018 (UTC) I know the ad was unorthodox, but doesn't it qualify as WP:SELFSOURCE? Many articles on books include them being selected for some "Book of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 26
Selasa, 2020-07-07 08:24:25them. I was careful not to use "self-published" books, but did see WP:SELFSOURCE, and think my references pass the 5-point sniff test therein. Some famous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 8
Rabu, 2020-10-21 03:58:10that out for consideration. It can't sustain an article alone per WP:SELFSOURCE#5, though. I'll likely recommend a redirect to Judge Dredd: The Mega Collection...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1031
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:56:37sources for any reason except when they are possibly cited as such per WP:SELFSOURCE. So, Wikipedia doesn't consider itself reliable for the most part and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 24
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 01:34:18something other than himself, which doesn't meet the standards for WP:SELFSOURCE). [36] This seems to be some sort of user-generated profile about the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:15:54would be more useful. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, self-published sources can be used for the purposes of verification for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 27
Kamis, 2020-12-10 00:04:34FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBAND, only sources are WP:UGC / WP:SPS / WP:SELFSOURCE that do not establish notability Leijurv (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2020...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Archive.is RFC 3
Sabtu, 2026-04-25 03:03:25sources for WP:NPOV, unlike archive.is, which is not a source (remember WP:SELFSOURCE). We do not use their services (like putting a pipebomb somewhere). See...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:30:19which is used to cite Fowlie's hometown, an acceptable practice per WP:SELFSOURCE.— TAnthonyTalk 22:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC) KEEP - As the creator of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:21:56JSTOR · TWL) The article is was supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A third-party was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:06:10(talk) No one is disputing FB as an acceptable External link, but per WP:SELFSOURCE it should not be used as a source if it is unduly self-serving. I don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2012 June 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 15:43:05authenticity; the article is not based primarily on such sources. see WP:SELFSOURCE. The third party bar and the fact that she has not published the material...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 776
Senin, 2022-02-21 14:50:29reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)". Thank you and cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Can...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 December 8
Sabtu, 2022-12-17 02:48:58free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost all sources are WP:SELFSOURCE. No reliable sources to justify inclusion in Wikipedia UtoD 12:51, 8 December...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:06:05follow certain rules-- one of which that particular citation did break WP:SELFSOURCE.) I think these changes and those already made by other editors has greatly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:43:172 June 2019 (UTC) Option 4 or option 3 at best. We can literally use SELFSOURCE to state that MintPress is widely considered unreliable. They have built...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:28:47FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable in-universe cruft. All sources are WP:SELFSOURCED Wikias. — IVORK Discuss 03:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC) Automated comment:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 1
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:16:47FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A {{third-party}} tag was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 316
Selasa, 2021-08-10 21:30:34see an emerging consensus for that, as long as we have the caveat of WP:SELFSOURCE, referred to by "The source may still be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:03Also: [13] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:36Also: [12] As was listed in the original deletion: WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:PROMO, etc. PeterWesco (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:29:01importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published! Shrikanthv...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:51:26August 2017 (UTC) I removed the blog references, but according to WP:SELFSOURCE, sources from the subject themselves are allowed for claims that are not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:25:49independent references. Jlicy (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE information from this article can be used as sources in the merged to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive318
Selasa, 2022-08-30 21:37:39BLPNAME protections. This is a WP:SELFSOURCE issue, not a BLPNAME issue. If a reliable source can be found, or SELFSOURCE can be satisfied, I see no reason...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:02:44images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NCORP, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:SELFSOURCE — Articles primary editors are IPs, Flyerland (talk · contribs),...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 179
Sabtu, 2023-12-30 14:34:33had the BRI said this directly themselves we could have used it as a WP:SELFSOURCE. (we are talking about a free online course that they don't make money...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:20:06self-published by the subject can be used sparingly per WP:PRIMARY, WP:BIASED, WP:SELFSOURCE. Zirin is by no means the most notable lawyer or writer in New York, but...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ice Bucket Challenge participants
Selasa, 2025-11-18 00:12:382014 (UTC) See Talk:List_of_notable_Ice_Bucket_Challenge_participants#WP:SELFSOURCE.3F. You need to stop removing references to the official YouTube and Facebook...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:38:00I have a tendency to stay away from Facebook as a WP:RS as it is a WP:SELFSOURCE, but it might point a way to some other areas that could be used. - Pmedema...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 29
Selasa, 2021-07-13 02:38:18sources (i.e. they meet WP:RS by complying with the guidelines in WP:SELFSOURCE). The sourcing is a little bit weak in places, but not because of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 508
Senin, 2023-03-27 10:00:21purview of WP:SELFSOURCE as social media. TimothyJosephWood 19:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC) @Verified Cactus, Timothyjosephwood I agree, WP:SELFSOURCE is applicable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2014 October 23
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:31:01from independent, reliable third-party sources (see WP:RS, especially WP:SELFSOURCE). Most people won't complain, when some basic facts are taken from his...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 315
Rabu, 2021-12-08 12:55:12described, and should only be used in accordance with the five-factor WP:SELFSOURCE test. Neutralitytalk 00:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC) I think your opinion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:54:47must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources …. WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves Self-published...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 5
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:09:45article, though they are not preferred, are considered valid sources per WP:SELFSOURCE, and are used only for things such as his full name, birth date, and quotations...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:04:14(UTC) The book on the school's history is quite acceptable as per WP:SELFSOURCE. It is factual and not unduly self-serving. There is no reason to suppose...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:01:0221:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC) I believe the appropriate subsection is WP:SELFSOURCE. –HTD 05:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Oppose as there are no sources outside...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:45:09the offending text re-sourced or removed. I also have to point out WP:SELFSOURCE, to wit, Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241
Senin, 2026-07-27 07:12:36Reddit. (Curiously, Reddit is mentioned in WP:SELFPUB, but not in WP:SELFSOURCE.) I understand that reddit comments are generally considered to obviously...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:55:252012 (UTC) Responsive to Northamerica1000, Procedural Keep: WP:RS -> WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published_and_questionable_sources_as_sources_on_themselves “Self-published …...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:58:07wikiGnomes still rejected the page with no objection to the Icoc page's 80+ selfsourced links. Same for the Kip McKean page; it is 95% self sourced. If a pile...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:51:09(from public cyber) 11:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Jim Carter: Check WP:SELFSOURCE. Yes a film is not independent of itself but it is one of those instances...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 9
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:57:16the reliablity. Apart from this, such sources can be considered as WP:SELFSOURCE , that can be only used for the information about subject, not as a reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:56:10talk page :/ Informedskeptic (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE guideline seems to give the green light to using Facebook for a D.O.B...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:26:00information is being sourced from the biographee they are often classed with WP:SELFSOURCE. See the essay at WP:Interviews. In this instance it appears that they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:33:13Wikipedia policy regarding use of self-published material. According to WP:SELFSOURCE: "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 February 3
Senin, 2022-03-28 11:42:09above, there are some limited cases where Facebook may be used; see WP:SELFSOURCE for details. However, that would require that the Deep Springs College...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190
Minggu, 2023-03-19 06:36:09sourcing sufficient to establish verifiability at content level (per WP:SELFSOURCE). My question has nothing to do with then extracting content from the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:40:32WP:NNC on notability. I think many of the other citations comply with WP:SELFSOURCE. Some of them are a bit lazily implemented like citation #19 for the open...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:00:41I am a bit unclear how it words regarding tweets from Twitter. WP:SELFSOURCE mentions: These requirements also apply to pages from social networking websites...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:52determining reliability, per WP:RSSELF, as towards whether they count as a WP:SELFSOURCE or could qualify an 'exception' as "Self-published material may sometimes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:22:53not writing about the subject itself, and in any event would be a WP:SELFSOURCE even if it were to contain tangential information on the subject. WP:PROF...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 3
Kamis, 2020-11-12 05:51:02exceptional claim(s)" should have been deleted from the article, as per WP:SELFSOURCE Jzsj (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Nope. Otherwise I wouldn't have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:27:15WP:CORPDEPTH. Secondly, the additional references are in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE. I don't fell that any of the points made in these references make the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 30
Selasa, 2022-10-25 23:06:18is clearly related to WP:RS, especially the sections WP:BIASED, and WP:SELFSOURCE and the sections in between those including WP:QUESTIONABLE. Given the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 140
Minggu, 2026-04-19 18:09:26Jehovah's Witnesses official website, 2010". I checked WP:PSTS and WP:SELFSOURCE, and the only potential problem I can see is authorship. The WTS publications...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:37third-party sources. Collect (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE says different. A press release is not a WP:SOURCE, the party publishing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:51:17interpreted. The basic argument here is OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST smooshed with SELFSOURCED. That's really not a sufficient reason to blow up a competent, verifiable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:17:25whatever they want about the figure, which seems to create an issue with WP:SELFSOURCE. Regarding the videos and blogs, it's all self published and anyone can...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 November 20
Rabu, 2025-11-26 10:04:46does not accept self-published sources, it makes an exception for WP:SELFSOURCE when describing the subject matter itself, which is the case for this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everywhere at the End of Time/archive1
Kamis, 2022-03-24 07:05:51don't see how one source would be more reliable than the other, per WP:SELFSOURCE, and Kirby confirmed that this is his YouTube channel throughout various...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The People's Cube
Senin, 2025-12-01 13:58:04the offending text re-sourced or removed. I also have to point out WP:SELFSOURCE, to wit, Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 525
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:17:38material used as sources of information about the subject themselves here WP:SELFSOURCE. I can see no reason not to use a university published article as a reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 17
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:04:10being just that, WP:GNG for coverage, WP:RELIABLE for reliability, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc, etc =/ Ren99 (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:53:40recording artists may be used as sources of information about themselves WP:SELFSOURCE, especially in the context of news-related articles with no reasonable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:42:29WP:SPORT, and the sole source is far from WP:RELIABLE since it is a WP:SELFSOURCE. — Jkudlick tcs 05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - the appeal of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:54:23(Self-published information is not denied by Wikipedia policy per se, see e.g. WP:SELFSOURCE.) --TuukkaH (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC) There is not much information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 664
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:13:21with the company, Uaria2008. Aguyintobooks is wrong about that. See WP:SELFSOURCE for advice on when such sources can be acceptable. Cordless Larry (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 293
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:43published by a reliable source, we don't even have to invoke WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SELFSOURCE because the interview would simply be considered reliable. However, the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 596
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:16:0107:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Concerns with understanding WP:RS and with WP:SELFSOURCE are in regards to a new article for Talalima Mobley - basically, I've...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 155
Minggu, 2026-03-15 17:21:14source for statements about that particular village, sort of like WP:SELFSOURCE? (Normally I avoid using such sites, but this particular page provides...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 9
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:08:32images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:SELFSOURCE, 2nd nomination (1st nomination result was delete), notability tag since...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 August 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:52:17WP:PRODBLP twice and tried to explain to the user that Twitter is WP:SELFSOURCED to no avail evidently. Arguably comes under WP:A7 in it's current form...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 67
Minggu, 2025-08-17 13:39:43I'd tend to accept a verifiably authentic CV as reliable only for WP:SELFSOURCE claims (which appears to be the same as WP:SELFPUB). I wasn't trying to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:37:36meets the guidelines. In regards to citing self-published articles WP:SELFSOURCE, nothing here is unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim, it does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Cook
Selasa, 2025-11-18 07:44:49talk page :/ Informedskeptic (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC) The WP:SELFSOURCE guideline seems to give the green light to using Facebook for a D.O.B...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bäckadräkten/archive1
Kamis, 2025-09-04 20:49:25reactions, but I've left the references to the disinformation websites as WP:SELFSOURCE. Now that it's in the article, I think those sentences provide valuable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:58:03the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a WP:SELFSOURCE and/or WP:NPOV issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136
Rabu, 2026-03-11 21:14:15subject itself and does not have any claims about any third party. Refer WP:SELFSOURCE. Even if Lorna hadn't cited any reference in her article, the source is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 495
Senin, 2024-09-30 21:26:57on your part. Sorry. --ColinFine (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE allows you to cite self-published sources under certain circumstances...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200
Jumat, 2023-04-28 00:01:27supported just by MFA's site ? “WarKosign” 20:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE can be used as long as the "The material is neither unduly self-serving...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 122
Kamis, 2026-06-25 11:24:53obvious that in this particular case it is. As to the content I believe WP:SELFSOURCE applies - the actual source is the actress involved giving statements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232
Selasa, 2026-03-03 00:21:16from the company that makes and sells P90X, which seems to breach WP:SELFSOURCE, as it makes claims about the alleged benefits of their product. [43]...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 204
Kamis, 2024-10-17 07:12:09can be a decent source for simply documenting that a book exist(ed).WP:SELFSOURCE Like many websites, portions of Goodreads is user generated, as is metacritic...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 260
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:56:45as sources of information about themselves, in some situations. See WP:SELFSOURCE. Without diffs or the specific claims and sources we can't say much else...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Russian Bride
Senin, 2025-12-01 14:00:13Unreliable according to Examplo347, but that is not in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE, which even explicitly mentions Facebook. The source is only used to establish...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174
Kamis, 2025-09-11 00:10:35are about the claims, not her, when you want to get out of meeting WP:SELFSOURCE. This material does not meet either policy exception for sourcing stuff...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braeden Wright
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:30:59follow certain rules-- one of which that particular citation did break WP:SELFSOURCE.) I think these changes and those already made by other editors has greatly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:12appropriate to include his opinions about her on her page, given that WP:SELFSOURCE itself says... "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 227
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 21:29:09self-published source, one we could cite only as a WP:PRIMARY document or via WP:SELFSOURCE. There are some exceptions; we know their sources for the CIA World Factbook...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Workshop
Kamis, 2023-03-09 05:09:54distort the holocaust may still be able to be used in accordance with WP:SELFSOURCE but not much else. I'm not saying you're completely right in the content...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 328
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:00referencing Glaukopis. Volunteer Marek 19:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Under WP:SELFSOURCE! It was an account of Chodakiewicz's "fall from grace" by his colleague...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Institutes in India
Minggu, 2025-11-30 00:47:02then have a cast-iron source (not third-party but, I think, fine by WP:SELFSOURCE) and the criterion for including a sub-list on the page would be that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 210
Kamis, 2026-02-19 18:02:47sourced to third-party sources. The full relevant guideline is at WP:SELFSOURCE. Hope that helps, Yunshui 雲水 12:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Though children's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 376
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:59interviews, if sufficiently illuminating, would be permissible under WP:SELFSOURCE, and so in that case I agree with X-750. Chubbles (talk) 23:14, 30 May...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:38:17questionable (self)sources. Awards are from a local webzine (H Texas). Per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ADMASK. Ben Ben (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 299
Minggu, 2026-03-15 22:11:36the grounds that, as others have observed, it may be an appropriate WP:SELFSOURCE for suitable material that isn't available anywhere else permissible,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192
Senin, 2025-09-01 03:35:53information about themselves or their activities. See also WP:TWITTER and WP:SELFSOURCE. Imo, it can also be used as source #2, if source #1 is a WP:RS, and that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 205
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:36:41pride. I followed the link to QUESTIONED which led to this list for WP:SELFSOURCE The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2022 June 9
Senin, 2022-06-13 07:28:36but is instead a "self source" and must be used with caution: see WP:SELFSOURCE. Arch dude (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Everyone above seems to be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 430
Sabtu, 2022-01-15 10:19:20cite the musician's website as a source for some content, as long as WP:SELFSOURCE is followed. If you do this, make sure that text is not directly copied...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive161
Sabtu, 2026-04-11 14:52:51explicitly prohibit using self-published sources talking of themselves (see WP:SELFSOURCE); however the moment an editor disputes a claim, you end up with no support...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:56--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE provides an exception only for self-published (non-reviewed) material...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:54:22considered reliable for providing Bostom's views at Andrew Bostom per WP:SELFSOURCE.VR talk 12:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Agreed, this should not be used. It's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:09something as being what her opinion is about it, so passes due to WP:SELFSOURCE. The article does portray her view of the Washington Post next to a Tampa...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodleigh School, North Yorkshire
Minggu, 2025-11-30 05:44:23(UTC) The book on the school's history is quite acceptable as per WP:SELFSOURCE. It is factual and not unduly self-serving. There is no reason to suppose...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/August 2020
Jumat, 2020-08-28 09:03:38still some self sources, these appear to me to be consistent with WP:SELFSOURCE, being either about Garran or identified as direct quotes by Garran about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive194
Minggu, 2026-02-22 15:29:03acknowledges that this is an unreliable source, but sees it as a case of WP:SELFSOURCE. My own view (I had to remove a whole lot of much worse sludge sourced...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 16:31:47contain trip reports, which might theoretically be used per WP:RSOPINION/WP:SELFSOURCE with the usual disclaimers, but I'm not familiar enough with either the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 142
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:00while WP:BLPPRIMARY suggests a birth certificate not be depended upon, WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:SELFPUB, and more specifically WP:DOB, shows how a birth date in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 325
Minggu, 2022-05-01 12:28:11Darwish as a source on wikipedia for anything other herself (as per WP:SELFSOURCE)? Darwish keeps popping up and I'd rather not waste more of the community's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 154
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:41:04However.... has Gastler ever publicly tweeted that information? See WP:SELFSOURCE. As long as usage criteria are met, self-sources such as an official tweet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 323
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:37about literally every site that we do consider unreliable?" Yes, per WP:SELFSOURCE, virtually any source is reliable as proof that source wrote something...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245
Jumat, 2024-01-26 18:24:37released by SPLC about Nawaz. You can't use it in any context (other than SELFSOURCE), in any article. --Dervorguilla (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC) No....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August
Selasa, 2012-08-07 22:33:19Attempts to puff up the SF article immediately violated WP:PROMOTION WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RS--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 11:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Yeah yeah...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 332
Sabtu, 2021-03-20 18:03:38the CCP and adjacent institutions where its use should be limited to WP:SELFSOURCE. Though, as with all sources, WP:DUE should be considered in every use...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July
Minggu, 2012-07-01 10:48:22for player base statistics and appear to meet the requirements of WP:SELFSOURCE. Regardless of debate about the quality of the independent sources, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 239
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:03:29would be WP:QUESTIONABLE and might be suspected of being based on WP:SELFSOURCE material from competing claimants, and as a claim in dispute should not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 June 22
Jumat, 2021-08-06 13:06:56Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 178
Rabu, 2022-03-16 12:33:14"primary sources". IMO, this is a case where a primary source is fine per WP:SELFSOURCE not to mention WP:SENSE. What do you folks think? (Relevant section of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 4
Selasa, 2026-05-12 15:25:29the institution's own website pages for individual courses, failing WP:SELFSOURCE en masse and representing exactly the kind of course-catalogue transcription...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhat Samgiita
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:30:07Wikipedia policy regarding use of self-published material. According to WP:SELFSOURCE: "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive257
Sabtu, 2022-05-28 22:51:56just cited as a copy of the booking report, which is an appropriate WP:SELFSOURCE. Of course, if somebody wants to use a different link to get to the booking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive209
Minggu, 2024-05-19 18:09:57have you read it? And did you happen to read the policy just under it WP:SELFSOURCE? Serialjoepsycho (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Actually the statement...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 October 28
Jumat, 2024-11-01 15:05:05revenue), sources published by your own organisation are acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. Anything beyond the basic facts meeting the six criteria listed at that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 337
Rabu, 2026-06-17 06:17:43Twitter). --Frontman830 (talk) 23:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Be mindful of WP:SELFSOURCE/WP:ABOUTSELF when deciding if an individual ref is acceptable for the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive204
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 23:58:01the material in question per my comments @ the article talkpage, and WP:SELFSOURCE to support the inclusion of the sourcing from the Ground Zero website...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2025 July 30
Selasa, 2025-08-05 12:59:11website only for basic, uncontroversial biographical facts in line with WP:SELFSOURCE. I’ve removed unverifiable personal details and focused the article on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2008 February 7
Jumat, 2025-11-21 20:44:10now, is that the policy or not? (Britannica will sometimes essentially selfsource with a "q.v")Thanks, Rich (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC) Hmmm .....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:11claim, as a lone source, so does not make the exceptions listed under WP:SELFSOURCE. Ramos1990 (talk · contribs) is insisting it is a quality source, however...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 389
Kamis, 2026-04-16 17:41:14WP:USERGENERATED, and so inherently unreliable except for the WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SELFSOURCE criterion? I'm not sure they ever had editorial oversight. Abuse and spam...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:10:31February 2015 (UTC) Companies may be reliable in the limited context of a WP:SELFSOURCE. Forums and wikis are not reliable in themselves. An expert statement...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive 16
Minggu, 2022-06-12 03:53:36exceptions to this rule. If you still wish to proceed, please review WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:SOCIALMEDIA and the RfC to ensure your edit is within sourcing guidelines...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 314
Rabu, 2022-05-25 06:00:57fusion in the garage are not), ... The full relevant guideline is at WP:SELFSOURCE." Best, w.carter-Talk 21:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC) @W.carter:, @KylieTastic:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 194
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:53:20possible use by the news media. The relevant guideline can be found at WP:SELFSOURCE, Bananasoldier. Press releases are not independent sources and can't be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 326
Jumat, 2026-01-30 17:25:09Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves Shortcut: WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive329
Minggu, 2022-05-15 01:42:56join the discussion at Talk:Ivy Latimer § Claims of transgenderism and SELFSOURCE. Elizium23 (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC) Vonny Sweetland (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 327
Jumat, 2015-04-10 13:45:45. I like to quote what a very experienced editor said to me about WP:SELFSOURCE when I asked the same question as a newbie: "the information must be uncontroversial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 May 28
Sabtu, 2021-01-02 03:41:54Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 222
Rabu, 2026-04-01 22:58:1214:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Welcome to the Teahouse. The guidance is at WP:SELFSOURCE. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC) I submitted an article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 7
Kamis, 2024-05-23 03:59:08should often be avoided, and in this case it should. Yes, you can WP:SELFSOURCE, but the relevance of the information (WP:ONUS) is to be decided by secondary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 4
Kamis, 2019-01-10 11:36:29Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)"....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 32
Sabtu, 2024-11-16 21:23:31to address. Jokestress (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 1. Per WP:SELFSOURCE, "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:14:26Attempts to puff up the SF article immediately violated WP:PROMOTION WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RS--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 11:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Yeah yeah...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive185
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:47:54considered a reliable source for non-contentious biographical information (WP:SELFSOURCE). You need to establish why a People interview is any different. How is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 377
Rabu, 2025-09-03 09:29:37questionable sources as sources on themselves[edit source] Shortcut WP:SELFSOURCE See also: Wikipedia:Verifiability § Self-published or questionable sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 207
Kamis, 2023-03-09 21:16:32dispute before coming here? Talk:Ivy Latimer#Claims of transgenderism and SELFSOURCE How do you think we can help resolve the dispute? Suggest how to apply...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 186
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 00:24:20whatsoever where Kate claims to have been Tom it can be used as a WP:SELFSOURCE. Rhoark (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC) We had a similar problem a couple...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 374
Minggu, 2023-03-19 23:39:23that these are appropriate "Cultural references" examples. See also WP:SELFSOURCE. Have these stories been retold #1 by anyone other than the author #2...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive285
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:23:13self sourcing for basic information such as birth dates is permitted WP:SELFSOURCE, and full dates are now common practice thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid editor help/Archive 1
Rabu, 2023-12-13 10:17:48your specific concern, his website is an appropriate source as per WP:SELFSOURCE. I'm Tony Ahn (talk) 21:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC) That's true. I was just...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive221
Minggu, 2026-03-08 01:20:01in these two cases. --kelapstick(bainuu) 13:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE, for Vitiligo, I'd say it's WP:UNDUE, but no BLP violation. It's a verified...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2019/12
Selasa, 2026-07-07 06:35:45publicly, which was added to the article and properly sourced under WP:SELFSOURCE. As the 'controversy' has been settled and no further BLP vandalism is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive170
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:45:37Carmen Ortiz page. This appears to be a violation of WP:UNDUE and WP:SELFSOURCE (the reference given is Torvalds' Google+ page). --Hirolovesswords (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:10:47scientific consensus was, and that alone should be worth relegating them to wp:SELFSOURCE to back up claims that conservatives have claimed X. BrxBrx(talk)(please...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 July 26
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 22:27:19for player base statistics and appear to meet the requirements of WP:SELFSOURCE. Regardless of debate about the quality of the independent sources, I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive333
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:39:18self-published sources for the subject is allowed within reason per WP:SELFSOURCE, reasonable people can disagree as to relevance, appropriateness, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 52
Jumat, 2023-04-21 20:14:56org.au The consensus was, to use a self-published source WP:SELFSOURCE for the introductory 'about themselves' para. In the second (latest revison)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creator's Choice Awards
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 23:58:40it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 25
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:03:44policies/guidelines that I am aware of that seem relevant here: WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFSOURCE, WP:ABOUTSELF. It would make sense if a biography were citing a facebook...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/April 2021
Jumat, 2021-04-30 23:32:41standard for WP:RS with flying colors, as well as the lower standard at WP:SELFSOURCE for uncontroversial claims about the interview subject. Hardcore Gaming...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 113
Senin, 2026-05-04 06:35:01fits the definition of "questionable source" that should adhere to WP:SELFSOURCE guidelines, severely limiting its use. --Kiyoweap (talk) 06:12, 10 April...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 106
Jumat, 2022-03-25 20:55:34they are not genuine endorsements but the link offered falls foul of WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive309
Selasa, 2025-09-23 21:37:34[31] Shakehandsman (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC) The book itself is a SELFSOURCE (since it was published by a third-party publisher, not technically a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hogwarts Legacy/archive1
Rabu, 2026-02-04 06:05:59transgender issues respectively at WP:RSP, is broadly acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE, I feel we should be cautious in attributing labels like "non-activists"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive210
Jumat, 2023-04-21 18:53:44snippets. Cheers. Collect (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, Twitter can be used if its use meets the five specified conditions. The...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 81
Jumat, 2023-03-03 14:54:10used to support non-controversial, non self-serving statements (like WP:SELFSOURCE). "In describing points of view on a subject, articles should fairly represent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2015
Selasa, 2015-06-30 00:28:05--Laser brain (talk) 20:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC) @Laser brain: Please see WP:SELFSOURCE. I use a webpage on the Scarborough Presbyterian Church's website to cite...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive276
Kamis, 2023-02-09 17:03:33belong to Mercer but someone else, his "brother" and therefore, per WP:SELFSOURCE is making claims about a third party, and inadmissable as a RS for Mercer's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2014
Senin, 2014-06-30 21:21:58source? I think the source is ok. I think it falls on the line of WP:SELFSOURCE. GamerPro64 21:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC) References are otherwise generally...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 515
Selasa, 2026-07-07 06:58:08Simonm223 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC) It is a WP:SELFSOURCE. I did not add it. If we accept WP:SELFSOURCE for claims about organization membership count...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/November 2020
Selasa, 2026-01-20 22:42:46source for these sections). Hope this is considered acceptable, per WP:SELFSOURCE. Jheald (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Support. I think the article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2017
Jumat, 2017-06-30 23:01:36citations to Twitter but these seem to be confined to sources which meet WP:SELFSOURCE, otherwise the sources used comply with reliable sourcing. Web sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/Today
Selasa, 2026-06-16 21:44:23page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 August 8
Minggu, 2026-08-09 03:11:31page is restored. Dingolover6969 (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Per WP:SELFSOURCE, a personal webpage or social media profile is considered a reliable source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 202
Rabu, 2026-07-08 23:57:09does not foster cooperation at all. The policy you are looking for is WP:SELFSOURCE BTW. And this case is a grey area of that policy. While the sources in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive259
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:50:19credibility. Also keep in mind, they are a self-published source (see WP:SELFSOURCE#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves), they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 216
Jumat, 2022-06-24 21:39:55sources I've included in the section meet RS standards, when considering WP:SELFSOURCE and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy#Appendix:_Reli...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 127
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:11:35learn that there is not a blanket restriction on their use. Indeed, WP:SELFSOURCE says "Self-published and questionable sources may be used [emph. added...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 177
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:45:16cover topics unrelated to it's mission, pretty much seals the deal per WP:SELFSOURCE in my opinion. Disclaimer: I am a sysop-lite on Conservapedia. Have you...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 123
Minggu, 2023-02-05 03:27:53inclusion. Relevant policies/guidelines include WP:FRINGE, WP:DUE, and WP:SELFSOURCE. VQuakr (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC) Re "so that they can attempt...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Files for upload/July 2017
Jumat, 2023-04-14 21:01:02to the paper itself, which is probably a big enough claim to fail WP:SELFSOURCE. I'd be interested to hear what others think. TimothyJosephWood 12:43...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive255
Kamis, 2023-02-09 17:02:19(talk) 17:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC) @Ronz: Yes, that would should work per WP:SELFSOURCE.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC) How about using http://www...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive332
Rabu, 2025-09-24 22:19:3819 October 2021 (UTC) Your "subject" argument conflates RSSELF with WP:SELFSOURCE. Reliable sources are independent published sources with a reputation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 28
Rabu, 2025-11-05 10:37:20WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Almost completely self-sourced, so WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 84
Minggu, 2022-02-27 11:11:19for facts (numbers of institutions, etc.) that are acceptable under WP:SELFSOURCE.) Interesting that the recent storm of criticism of the article's text...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/November 2012
Sabtu, 2012-12-01 12:21:00the information is self-submitted by the builders, it seems to meet WP:SELFSOURCE requirements. At the same time, if this is an issue, I don't think a whole...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 23
Kamis, 2026-02-12 21:12:36Conservapedia, hereafter C, can be used as a primary source about itself, SELFSOURCE. This is quoting C in an article about C. For that argument, go to WP:RSN...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2022
Jumat, 2022-04-01 05:54:36don't see how one source would be more reliable than the other, per WP:SELFSOURCE, and Kirby confirmed that this is his YouTube channel throughout various...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 47
Minggu, 2023-05-14 21:15:14two months, these Wiki pages are filled with wrong,misleading,outdated,selfsourced information from these business schools. As i expreseed concerns with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists - sourcing requirements
Kamis, 2026-04-30 07:28:25Using non-independent sources for this purpose is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. I still hold this opinion. There's no policy evidence that these lists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 15
Kamis, 2025-10-23 12:12:16issue. Also with regards to sourcing of certain statements I think WP:SELFSOURCE applies here. I think mentioning the ban is entirely reasonable as long...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 120
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 22:41:20talk:Martin Bina and Talk:Vancouver FC, particularly regarding NPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE, the editor continues to use that website as a source, including today:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 188
Minggu, 2024-01-07 20:45:01discussion elsewhere. Please see: Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Merge WP:SELFSOURCE to WP:ABOUTSELF. Summary: a fairly complicated section in the WP:RS guideline...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Source assessment/Rick Devens
Selasa, 2026-07-28 11:32:46self-published user-generated source; subject to WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:SELFSOURCE ~ Dunno which Instagram post, frankly, but this is still Devens's account...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 74
Sabtu, 2024-01-20 01:35:58independent of the subject is a concern, this must be contrasted with WP:SELFSOURCE) and there is also coverage in secondary sources. I do see several independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 189
Kamis, 2024-07-25 13:14:03merge 3. For a while now, we've been talking about how to merge WP:SELFSOURCE (in WP:RS) and WP:BLPSELFPUB in (WP:BLP) to WP:ABOUTSELF (in WP:V), since...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 March 9
Sabtu, 2023-03-18 00:05:10images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article is almost entirely WP:SELFSOURCE and makes no attempt to establish notability and instead simply lists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 1
Selasa, 2025-06-10 10:25:45and cannot support controversial points, but it's still usable under WP:SELFSOURCE for the basic facts of Barrow's birth and education and I've restored...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Grey Literature
Selasa, 2024-12-31 10:48:11addition to BLPSPS (because he and others had been talking about merging WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:BLPSELFPUB to WP:ABOUTSELF), he said "Given the level of nit-picking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 181
Sabtu, 2023-08-05 10:11:33inspired by Him, that this is what happened. So we're dealing with a WP:SELFSOURCE issue, and surely saying that one created the horse is a boastful claim...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1180
Senin, 2026-08-03 20:41:43interesting questions! Number 1 certainly seems interesting. It's partially WP:SELFSOURCE because it's published by the subject of the article, even though the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 20
Senin, 2025-04-28 23:05:29out of 10 sources come from Telegram, which could violate WP:UGC or WP:SELFSOURCE, and all sources date back to December 2024, making it outdated in regards...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists 2
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:59Using non-independent sources for this purpose is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE. Of course, if independent sources exist, even better. Just cite everything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 94
Jumat, 2026-05-01 22:08:43concerned about is the school's own website, which is allowable per WP:SELFSOURCE as the source is supporting everyday information about itself, such as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 442
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:13:37Wikipedia taking action. The ultimate guidance on this comes from WP:SELFSOURCE. While often times there is a due weight question regarding covering our...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 431
Selasa, 2024-05-21 08:58:43currently already does this. Friedbyrd (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) WP:SELFSOURCE we would have to fully include his narrative and only his narrative, which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398
Selasa, 2026-04-28 01:29:15non-contentious statements about itself (not other people or groups) per WP:SELFSOURCE. If you wish to write an original composition outside of Wikipedia, elevating...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 493
Selasa, 2025-11-11 00:33:34should not be used when it makes claims about third parties as per WP:SELFSOURCE. Andwats (talk) 14:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC) If the decision here is GUNREL...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 519
Jumat, 2026-07-24 00:59:27disambiguation, but no longer use it in the body using WP:VENDOR and WP:SELFSOURCE in article naming context using WP:USERGENERATED content in support of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407
Rabu, 2026-01-07 00:07:29mailing list post to cite the certification by FSF is acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE since the X200 is otherwise discussed there? It probably should be cited...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 415
Rabu, 2026-06-17 06:14:18Xx236 (talk) 13:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Yes, the problem with using SELFSOURCE isn't as much reliability as due weight (with the caveat that Xx236 mentions...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 1
Minggu, 2023-09-10 13:46:43again, we are dependent on what reliable independent sources say; per WP:SELFSOURCE, primary sources are only used for self-descriptive information such as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 190
Kamis, 2026-03-26 12:09:49(UTC) WP:BIASED might cover this if its written in a certain way or WP:SELFSOURCE might cover this as well, but once again it would depend on how it's written...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 12
Kamis, 2026-05-21 04:44:261 and 3 are archived pages from the college's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is a DGS approved institutes list, a directory entry excluded...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 6
Sabtu, 2026-02-14 09:39:11scale to address errors of fact might be just about "OK" (relative to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF), basing an entire article on such sources is highly...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 11
Selasa, 2026-05-19 20:24:59WP:MENTION. Reference 2 is the college's own history page, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 3 is a DIPR Mizoram press release covering an accreditation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 28
Sabtu, 2023-08-05 09:34:11whose only sources are IMDb and a dead link (presumably used to be a WP:SELFSOURCE). Copious tone and copyediting issues. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:45, 21 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 30
Sabtu, 2023-12-09 22:32:16found through research) seeming to violate WP:COI, if not directly WP:SELFSOURCE. For those sources for which I was not able to find direct evidence of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive348
Senin, 2024-12-23 10:03:04said something about himself on the web or article somewhere, see WP:SELFSOURCE. For images though you can put up a picture which is your work or for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 July 9
Sabtu, 2026-07-18 00:51:54see WP:RS for what we consider for reliable sources. Specifically, WP:SELFSOURCE says using sources published by the group the article is about can be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/AI images
Minggu, 2026-04-26 06:44:57personal emblem of this BLP", which presumably would be verified as a WP:SELFSOURCE, thus an exception to the ban. 2. Same idea. If this is the actual logo...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 242
Rabu, 2024-03-20 01:50:48coverage of both sides. In general, I propose broader use of WP:CS and WP:SELFSOURCE in this article, because it's simply impossible to cover everything by...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 August 28
Sabtu, 2025-09-06 21:18:26that they are fandom-style blogs run by specific groups. According to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:USERGENERATED, such fansites are generally not acceptable as sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 204
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 21:05:51them). WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC) I think that WP:SELFSOURCE guides us in another direction on anything that might be considered boastful...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1274
Selasa, 2026-07-21 08:51:46Jabba550 ✉ Talk to me :D 12:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC) Hi @Jabba550! WP:SELFSOURCE says that self-published sources may be used for information about itself...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 79
Senin, 2026-03-02 20:37:48policies? Vastmajority20025 (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC) See WP:SELFSOURCE. ArthurPlummer ( :) | talk | contribs) 21:58, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Yyou...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1209
Rabu, 2023-12-27 01:27:22but many of them I've seen are fleshed out with WP:RSSELF, WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE. How is significant coverage determined? I've found the below as guidance...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 20
Kamis, 2026-05-28 22:41:36and 8 are archived pages from the institution's own website, failing WP:SELFSOURCE. Reference 2 is the World Buildings Directory, an architectural catalogue...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 5
Jumat, 2023-10-13 12:39:20হানিফ আলী (talk) 04:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Indicate WP:UGC , WP:SELFSOURCE. not notable till now Worldiswide (talk) 03:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Where...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1181
Rabu, 2026-04-01 22:38:11sources -Bad At This (yell at me) 15:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Yep! WP:SELFSOURCE SpookyTwenty (talk) 15:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Sorry! This is my first...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1256
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:51:13website, which described his citizenship status and identity. Per [WP:SELFSOURCE], self-published sources should not be used to support material about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2024
Rabu, 2024-06-26 23:01:27reactions, but I've left the references to the disinformation websites as WP:SELFSOURCE. Now that it's in the article, I think those sentences provide valuable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/May 2024
Rabu, 2026-04-08 06:18:51general sense, and if followed literally would invalidate WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc. In this specific context, I don't think it's a problem to use a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2026
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 20:50:29transgender issues respectively at WP:RSP, is broadly acceptable per WP:SELFSOURCE, I feel we should be cautious in attributing labels like "non-activists"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1200
Jumat, 2025-10-10 21:57:40talk:Martin Bina and Talk:Vancouver FC, particularly regarding NPOV and WP:SELFSOURCE, the editor continues to use that website as a source, including today:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1187
Jumat, 2025-07-18 06:42:27as I see a lot of reversions such basic information for no reason. WP:SELFSOURCE Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works#For claims about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 August 3
Selasa, 2026-08-04 07:14:55it's the org's YouTube and Instagram, it's reliable for them) per WP:SelfSource. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 11:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 240
Jumat, 2024-01-05 01:18:00"Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves" (WP:SELFSOURCE) of our WP:RS guideline: "Self-published or questionable sources may be...
Click to read more »