Search Results: Wikipedia:RMEC
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions
Minggu, 2026-08-09 17:42:33(or use the |pmc= parameter in the closing template). Shortcut WP:RMECWP:RMEC In general, move discussions should remain open for at least seven days (168...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requested moves
Minggu, 2026-08-09 18:10:15(168 hours) but can be withdrawn under specific circumstances as per WP:RMEC. Alternatively, the opener of a discussion can close it only if unanimous...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Should we disallow opening parallel RM and AfD discussions?
Senin, 2026-08-10 04:47:38during an active AfD discussion. It's already an accepted practice in WP:RMEC; Furthermore, any editor may end such a move request with a procedural close:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review
Jumat, 2026-08-07 18:45:31proposals after they have received support from other editors". The cited WP:RMEC is merely an essay, and another page was also cited; the latter page links...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 3
Rabu, 2026-03-25 05:20:38of forming a local consensus here. A disambiguation page can include WP:RMEC, WP:DRV#Speedy closes, and WP:GAFAIL. In GA-land, speedy closes are called...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 41
Minggu, 2026-07-12 17:16:02page has also been discussed at ANI and a move was rejected at RMTR. Per WP:RMEC, this shouldn't be closed "before this snowballs", but only if snowball applies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 December
Minggu, 2025-01-12 11:52:0906:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Relist. Procedurally defective as a bad WP:RMEC—no basis for early closure. WP:BADNAC does not apply to Requested moves as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026 February
Rabu, 2026-04-01 21:22:33TarnishedPathtalk 22:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Ps, the closing instructions (see WP:RMEC) only provide for procedural closes to occur in the case of discussions started...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2023 September
Minggu, 2023-10-08 21:35:00bureaucracy? Early RM closures are a part of the process, and detailed over at WP:RMEC, while WP:IMR explicitly says that you absolutely MUST attempt to discuss...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 186
Selasa, 2023-10-24 04:24:40better discussed (if you wished to start one) at WT:RM, the talk page for WP:RMEC. This would also have implications for the criterias WP:ITNBLURB, WP:DYKTAG...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2026 May
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 02:46:43proposals after they have received support from other editors". The cited WP:RMEC is merely an essay, and another page was also cited; the latter page links...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2025 January
Sabtu, 2025-02-15 01:20:29contributions) 22:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Endorse as a snowball clause case. WP:RMEC tells us [t]his clause should not be used to close a discussion when a particular...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1210
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:08:16disruptive, which beyond an invocation of WP:IAR is not allowed under WP:RMEC. They stated in said close that they would take this issue to ANI if they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive365
Sabtu, 2024-10-26 23:03:51hunts> 18:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) @NightWolf1223 & @Carguychris: per WP:RMEC, an RM may not be withdrawn if any editor "has suggested any outcome besides...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1211
Jumat, 2026-03-13 11:11:02January 2026 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment) @Kautilya3 Does this meet WP:RMEC? LLM generation isn't (yet) a reason to close an RM early. If the nominator...
Click to read more »