(and other editors at that article) are engaging in WP:REVTALK. Don't Do That, chuckle. REVTALK actually encourages reverting because the only way to communicate...

(question: was that trying to drag me into an edit war discussion?) (read WP:REVTALK) I didn't know that the page was protected never got notified except now...

the issue and have requested the user discuss it on the talk page per WP:REVTALK. User has not cited any policies, yet I have. Instead, they are citing...

Edit summaries should not be used to argue with another editor. From WP:REVTALK, Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiations over the...

problem - editors cannot read minds. WP:FIES applies here as well as WP:REVTALK. Yet the edit here says : Australian rules football was played overseas...

[10]-misleading [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Revtalk Ownership:[20][21][22][23] Revtalk SPA:[24][25][26][27] Revtalk Vandalism:[28] At ArbCom, Sue mentioned...

the edit summary to debate or disute the previous summary claim (See WP:REVTALK) is one reason to consider this single revert an edit war. With the addition...

convince him to show some respect for WP:TALK, WP:BURDEN, WP:NOR, and WP:REVTALK. Jayjg (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC) "The question is whether RS use...

148.60 (talk) 07:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC) You should be aware of the WP:REVTALK policy. Nasnema  Chat  07:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC) The article should have...

Scalhotrod repeatedly deleting the same info, not discussing, using only WP:REVTALK: 08:01, 6 June 2014 [47] First delete of info. 07:53, 7 June 2014 [48]...

which I had not seen yet since it was just in an edit summary (see WP:REVTALK) she opened this bogus ANI report. It's blatant entrapment and an abuse...

completely agree with your opinion on the ratio of talk page edits to WP:REVTALK. Still, I'd like to stress that "prior convictions" ought not weigh against...

sort and using the edit summary to make a claim as such goes against WP:REVTALK, which states: "Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation...

choice to continuing posting. ¡Bozzio! 17:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC) See WP:REVTALK. And using profanity in your edit summaries while simultaneously expecting...

vandalism. It simply looks like both users have to look at WP:OWN and WP:REVTALK, as well as what is NOT vandalism, because all I see from the edit summaries...

text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit... Also WP:REVTALK: Proper use of edit summaries is critical to resolving content disputes...

reverting edits with insults in edit summaries (which also violates WP:REVTALK). As I mentioned above, you've used some of the most offensive words in...

--Scal 21 May 2014 I warned him [210] about three instances of using WP:REVTALK to attack and bait me:[211][212][213] He deleted the warning:[214] Response...

disagrees with Pixarh's sourcing, but that's a talk page matter not a WP:REVTALK matter.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC) You...

reverting my edits (and often other editors' too in the process) and REVTALKing about/at me? Prior to my asking for help back in August, she showed no...

the reasons for removing the prod because there isn't space and, per WP:REVTALK, we should "Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation...

self-imposed exile from poetry articles. This is contrary not only to WP:REVTALK which states “Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation...

"nasty". I could have done this in user talk, but BMK's a big fan of WP:REVTALKing, so I went with his usual mode of communication. Speaking of the 'boards:...

like it could be feasible. Bawolff (talk) 13:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC) WP:REVTALK has a some good ideas and some bad ideas. Some of the "good ideas" are...

can seem curt or insufficiently explanatory; we're advised to avoid WP:REVTALK and take it to a full talk-page discussion if one is thought necessary...

supposed to be succinct summaries of what was done in the edit. Per WP:REVTALK, "Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the...

you try to do was discuss things via edit summaries as explained in WP:REVTALK, and such an approach is usually not productive. Moreover, if you were...

disputation. It should be (along with my response to it, and SchroCat's REVTALK [8]) administratively removed to the RfA's talk page, as has already been...

article. This needs to be resolved in talk, not with tendentiousness and revtalk.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  19:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Fully protected...

Edit summaries are not a substitute for talk page discussion (see WP:REVTALK). clpo13(talk) 15:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC) So every single edit needs to...

SBV Vitesse season, trying using the article talk page instead of WP:REVTALKing to each other. You also can always seek input from WP:FOOTY by starting...

the edit warrior, but in an edit summary which is not appropriate (WP:REVTALK), that I need consensus to restore that revision (not true - WP:CONS)....

Talk pages are where discussion should take place (See for example WP:REVTALK and WP:BRDDISCUSS). - Aoidh (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Actual...

would you mind starting a new thread on the article's talk page per WP:REVTALK? CityOfSilver 02:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC) CityOfSilver sure thing! -...

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC) I meant it per WP:REVTALK: Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the...