for the meanings of everyday words and phrases. Shortcuts WP:REFBOMBWP:REFBOMB WP:BOMBARDWP:BOMBARD A common form of citation overkill is adding sources...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Although the refbombing is a problem, that can and should be fixed editorially. Sandstein 06:33...

4 June 2021 (UTC) Delete all that's been done now is a significant WP:REFBOMBing of non-notability lending references. Some of these don't even mention...

I don’t see positions or awards that would make notability clear. The refbombing does not include independent in depth coverage. Mccapra (talk) 15:00,...

and a campaigner for Ron Paul. Per nom, this is a good example of WP:REFBOMBing with nothing in the way of reliable sources propping up this article....

be hidden: The use of numerous, often unnecessary references, known as refbombing, can give a good impression and make an article appear notable. In many...

TWL) Substantially similar to Draft:Smartscout, though not identical. Refbombing includes, for example, three articles in Men's Journal, Business Insider...

16:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Someone has out a lot of work into refbombing thus article but there’s no indication of notability. May be WP:TOOSOON...

or promo. For the less experienced UPE editor they make the error of REFBOMBING and you’d end up seeing a one or two line sentence article having up to...

a lot of what makes the company stand out on its own. It's almost WP:REFBOMBing and there's a lack of substance with the presented sources. Look at WP:SIRS...

and not others? Why is one a keyboard credit? Also concerns about WP:REFBOMBing AllMusic. Broad in coverage: There is very little biographical info about...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pure refbombing here. Most sources aren't independent and repeat the same short blurb...

website has no significant coverage in independent sources. The current refbombing consists largely of press releases with an occasional passing mention...

Shellwood (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Delete: An article appended with refbombing of passing mentions which fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH...

apparent COI editor. Completely fails WP:BASIC. One of the worst cases of WP:REFBOMBING I've ever seen. Sources are either trivial mentions or don't mention the...

number of namedrops, a number of primary sources, a heap of obfuscatory refbombing, heavily promotional tone, no evidence the subject actually meets the...

(UTC) Delete. The WP:REFBOMBING isn't as bad as it is in Tom Wheelwright (author) (12 citations compared with 31), but REFBOMBING it is. Only 3 of the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Significant refbombing. Click a few cited links and you'd find it difficult to spot her mention...

quote, often with the other organizers). That's not a concern that is refbombing. I can't really find much outside of the Harlem Cultural Festival. Finally...

but its local branch NRK Møre og Romsdal. We also have a variant of WP:REFBOMBing, namely WIKIBOMBing, in that the low-quality article has been spread across...

(UTC) Delete fails both WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Despite some spectacular refbombing, every reference from a reliable source is about some other subject and...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC) Delete - creator WP:REFBOMBing the article with sources that do not meet IS RS SIGCOV demonstrates the...

is yet another copy of the same press release. Looks like badly done REFBOMBING and scheming? There perhaps needs to be some balance see for example this...

branding PangolinPedia 07:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom; the WP:REFBOMBing fails to hide the lack of notability Spiderone 23:48, 15 January 2021...

discussions. North America1000 13:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC) Delete - the WP:REFBOMBing is substantially primary, press-release and promotional, and the article...

deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Is this a refbombing of press release churnalism and passing mentions? - David Gerard (talk)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A horrible promo piece with a nasty case of WP:REFBOMBing. I trawled through them 17 affiliated or subjects own site, 3 press releases...

in-depth coverage that satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH is seen in the article. WP:REFBOMBING is also an issue in this article. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:02, 29 October...

there exist non-WP:SIGCOV references. Lastly, it doesn't help with WP:REFBOMBing of the article with a couple of books that aren't about her. These were...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NEOLOGISM. Refbombing the article with quotes such as "Other events include [...] performances...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Despite the valiant refbombing, the bottom line is that this actor's career comprises of minor parts...

improvement, so time to put this out of its misery? Despite the valiant refbombing, none of the sources cited are RS and the coverage isn't significant,...

seen by the repeating of one source five times (50%), that is obvious refbombing to pad sourcing, to give the illusion of such notability. Otr500 (talk)...

deletion/Ask Tuki--DBigXrayᗙ 11:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete Despite the WP:REFBOMBING (including passing mentions, IMDB and even forums), this article does...

Delete Spamvertisement. No evidence of actual notability amongst all the refbombing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC) The above discussion...

10 February 2021 (UTC) Delete per others. This is a classic case of refbombing. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

discussions. Abishe (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Delete Despite the refbombing in the article, the sources presented are all either not independent,...

is this refbombing in any capacity? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Because that is the first two points of the WP:REFBOMB essay -...

that referencing an article with a range of citations is now called a REFBOMB - isn't that the point of Wikipedia and notability? I can provide a ton...

significant coverage" in the references. The references appear to be WP:REFBOMBING. No significant coverage, therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 00:09, 24...

to be considered "refbombing". I mean, if I pretended all the sources in 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season consituted "refbombing" and tried to get...

subject. GargAvinash (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Lot of WP:REFBOMBing but none of the sources establish that Shankar comes even close to being...

paid-for spam. MER-C 18:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Delete. A fine example of WP:REFBOMBing: discard the gossip, the promo and the YouTube videos, and there's nothing...

song to; (3) sources 14 through 39 are refbombing a single fact; (4) sources 40 through 51 are another refbomb, consisting of 11 different reprints of...

Олег Черкасский (talk) 08:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Delete complete WP:REFBOMBing of self-written posts and at least one of the other articles (Metro News)...

here that is actually salvageable when you examine beyond the blatant REFBOMBing. This party has elected no candidates to any office and does not appear...

to fix the article, but most of the sources are not reliable or are WP:REFBOMBing by scraping up dozens of passing mentions. Several of the sources don't...

reconsidering my position, but these aren't very strong sources and WP:REFBOMBing the article with weak references doesn't make it any easier to evaluate...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:WEBCRIT and WP:NME .It's all refbombing if one checks the cited sources. - hako9 (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2020...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and has a major WP:REFBOMB issue. No point in draftifying, the major contributor moved it to main...

not immediately relevant to this AfD, the PAID, PROMO, FV and apparent REFBOMBing issues are difficult to ignore. Guliolopez (talk) 20:11, 30 June 2022...

2016 (UTC) delete blatantly written like a press release, and the WP:REFBOMBing is mostly primary sources and press releases - David Gerard (talk) 15:55...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Despite the valiant refbombing effort, there's actually very little to even suggest, let alone prove...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article suffers from a serious case of WP:REFBOMBING, including links to the author's academic publications, IMDB pages, and...

significant coverage" in the references. The references appear to be WP:REFBOMBING. No significant coverage, therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 00:06, 24...

Sandals1 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Delete Once you get past the WP:REFBOMBing it is clear that there isn't enough substantial independent sourcing to...

(talk) 15:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC) Delete This appears to be a case of WP:REFBOMBing. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...

North America1000 14:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC) Delete Despite the WP:REFBOMBing, this is mostly press-releases, press-releasey or trivial passing mentions...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pretty much entirely original research and refbombing. Sourced to dubious or unreliable sources (including wikipedia articles)...

List of WWE Raw special episodes. Notability is not met despite the WP:REFBOMBING. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

signed, Rosguill talk 07:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC) Delete. Talk about WP:REFBOMBing; more like carpet bombing. None of the sources - including the one singled...

beforehand search doesn't result in much either. Pretty obvious attempt of refbombing their way into having an article. Also, why must every article he wrote...

citations and refbombing. Only verifiable, policy-compliant sources remain.https://www.lumbinionline.com/31530/ Yes, I agree, I apologize for refbombing earlier...

TWL) Promo/vanity piece by COI editor on a non-notable filmmaker. The refbombing consists mostly of coverage of her company or their productions, not of...

(TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Delete due to non-notability and for refbombing as mentioned by nominator and doomsdayer520. Prof.PMarini (talk) 08:51...

4 June 2023 (UTC) Delist Despite the huge reception, it may all be WP:REFBOMBing. I am unsure if the character's notable, but even if she is, this is in...

notability, sourcing, refbombing" - there were only issues in Eli Jerby and you were the one that have decided to crusade the entry. Refbombing? are you serious...

An awful article, but he looks notable passing WP:NPROF. Convert the refbombing to a brief list of his awards, and trim off irrelevant material such as...

Wikilawyering that WP:BIO1E cannot count because there is sufficient refbombing of insignificant sources related to; "Ohio Democrat Chairman Coleman Speaks...

Delete This calls for harsh measures and some less COI. The level of refbombing is just amazing. If someone not connected to the subject believes he is...

vote above. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC) REFBOMBing is more about misleading through passing mentions or sourcing content...

much about his person to show notability. Article reads like PROMO with refbombing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC) Delete. Per nom. Clearly...

Mihri Çınar. Şentürk does not meet WP:GNG; the article is currently a WP:REFBOMBing of stats-only coverage from UEFA and the Turkish Football Federation,...

amount of) sources looks like a minor case of WP:SYNTH and possibly WP:REFBOMBING. Most political designations can be used as an insult by a differing factor...

18:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Delete. The sources in the article are WP:REFBOMBing of Discogs, YouTube and IMDb - all of which are WP:UGC and none of which...

I'm trying not to be, I find myself disquieted by the volume of PROMO, REFBOMBing, and the apparent misrepresentation of sources found in the original creation...

are a couple of quality indepth independent sources among all of the WP:REFBOMBING. However, most of the coverage is either trivial passing mentions, or...

relevant notability guidelines, a fact which is obfuscated by the WP:REFBOMBing in the article. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 12:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There seems to be some WP:REFBOMBing. The highest quality references here (e.g. Economist, Wall Street Journal)...

they. Cameron Scott (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC) *Weak Delete: The refbombing is insane here; this is one of the highest ratios of references to actual...

not certain that many of the links are basically just an inadvertent WP:REFBOMBING (e.g. using fake sources) in an attempt to make the article appear to...

also the main topic is his company. Thus the sources provided are just a REFBOMBING and the subject have no significant coverage at all and fails GNG. There...

notable Star Mississippi 14:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Delete as nommed. Refbombing always happens for a reason. Q.E.D. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:57, 23 June...

offered in the article (which, I might note, represent significant WP:REFBOMBING) are all street directory style listings, "mentions in passing" (where...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Despite the impressive refbombing, the sources don't actually provide the RS sigcov required for notability...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable businessperson. Despite the refbombing, all of the refs are not beyond a trivial mention, not in independent...

20 July 2020 (UTC) Delete One actual independent, RS amongst all the Refbombing doth not notability make. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:06, 20 July 2020...

(UTC) I don't think it is refbombing.4meter4 (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC) Yes it is. The major criterion of WP:REFBOMB is Citations lacking significant...

contribute to Chrom's notability in any way). To better illustrate how much refbombing I feel is going on in this article, this is the version I made after editing...

2023 (UTC) Merge Article contains mostly listicles that amount to WP:REFBOMBING. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 04:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC) Merge. On my own research,...

Frost (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC) Delete Despite the valiant refbombing efforts — mostly with sources of the poorest quality, and some cited multiple...

Babymissfortune 16:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG. There is some refbombing as there are two instances of "official" sites used as references. While...

(talk) 01:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC) Changed to Weak Keep based on recent refbombing of sources. The sources here are very fringe, but the quantity pushes...

of outright junking it. BornonJune8 (talk) 10:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC) WP:REFBOMBING. Some of these do not count as WP:RS, most of these focuses on the events...

non-notable individual, fails WP:BIO with flying colours, despite the valiant refbombing efforts. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC) Delete per...

only superficially appears to do so at a glance because of extreme WP:REFBOMBing. Exacerbating this, every aspect of this biography indicates COI at best...

deleted on the consensus view that prodigious references amounted to WP:REFBOMBing. It was observed that this person, being a working journalist, has generated...

WP:BADCHARTS; awards do not appear to be notable; sources smell of WP:REFBOMBing. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up...

06:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Non-notable, despite the valiant refbombing effort. Also possible COI issues. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 12 November...

should be moved back to main space only after the promotionalism and refbombing has been thoroughly cleaned up. Sandstein 19:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)...

by SPA, who also contested a PROD on it. This is the version with the REFBOMBing cut down a bit. The RSes are articles about Bybit, and only mention Zhou...

discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 18:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. Refbombing thirteen references at the end of a sentence in the lead does not advance...

them. Same seems to be the case here, fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST. WP:REFBOMBing didn't help, they just establish that subject has received some passing/trivial...

deletion discussions. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC) Comment - Refbombing is one thing, but there's a ton of content and prose here. It's...difficult...

Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC) Delete pretty heavy WP:REFBOMBing but upon closer look Dunn isn't really ever the (or even a) focal point...

two sources added are obviously not significant coverage – textbook WP:REFBOMBing. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC) Comment...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable 'research institute'; despite the heavy refbombing, the sources are close and/or primary, or passing incidental mentions...

years ago, notability does not expire. The article is not refbombed; refbombing is when several (questionable-quality) references are stacked onto a small...

DMySon 04:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete, article has been subject to refbombing, but there is not enough actual coverage for a GNG pass. Devonian Wombat...

sense that at least some of the objection stems from the excessive WP:REFBOMBING, which can--and should--be fixed editorially. Finally, if you believe...

apparently copiously sourced, a closer look demonstrates this is pure WP:REFBOMBing. Fully 26 out of the 35 references are to various VC funding transactions...

internet is not helpful. You need to provide in depth coverage instead of WP:REFBOMBing the article, making it impossible for anyone to discern if there is actual...

WP:GNG. Although the article has over 40 citations, this is a case of refbombing. Virtually every citation is either: routine campaign coverage, a primary...

29 January 2021 (UTC)Super Virginian The point of this AfD is not the refbombing or the number of newspaper sources: what we need is significant coverage...

(talk) 23:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Delete: This is some of the worst refbombing I have ever seen. I removed the most obviously bad ones trying to get...

December 2019 (UTC) Delete - despite this editor's characteristic WP:REFBOMBING of their very likely WP:UPE creations, fails GNG, BIO, non-notable businessman...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Cross-wiki spam that is a classic case of WP:REFBOMB of 'references' that don't even mention the subject. Those that do mention...

16:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC) Delete, per Bearcat. Once you get past the refbombing, there's very little of substance to look at at all. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:12...

BabbaQ (talk) 08:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Delete: Fails GNG and WP:NORG. Refbombing to show notability. A quick look found three of the links are dead and...

Khanna K group" returns nothing except his LinkedIn. Another case of WP:REFBOMBING. C F A 💬 16:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

TWL) Doesn't meet WP:FILMMAKER. Most of the references are borderline WP:REFBOMBING which doesn't prove notability or support the text; for instance.Sambrenxx...

of sources on his dewiki article. Is that a case of primary sources or refbombing? buidhe 09:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC) Delete, without prejudice against...

be cromulent, but it seems that the article has suffered an intense WP:REFBOMBING campaign (many of them are links to his personal website, primary sources...

about a subject who does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG, or WP:NMUSIC. The refbombing(?) just does not provide significant sourcing. I know the AfD admins like...

Spurs and Barrigan having press attention for it. Das osmnezz must stop refbombing AFDs with unreliable sources and brief mentions of the subject. Dougal18...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An absolute promotional WP:REFBOMB for a subject that does not pass WP:NCORP. Like any good PR company, there...

10:37, 27 September 2025 (UTC) Delete, very badly written page full of refbombing. Clearly WP:TOOSOON by some years. While I applaud Safetystuff for adding...

with a 'main' link here, but that is not a matter for GA or GAR. Reduced refbombing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC) Conservation status:...

subject, either under GNG or NPROF or any other guideline. Victim of WP:REFBOMBing that should be put out if its misery. Catrìona (talk) 09:35, 13 December...

members recorded, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED Despite copious WP:REFBOMBing, the evidence is not enough to pass WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There is a lot of refbombing in this orphan article. Whilst a lot of the coverage confirms he bought...

JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage to pass WP:GNG- WP:REFBOMBing the lead with a few articles listing the people playing is not significant...

20 July 2025 (UTC) Delete Blatant promo that fails GNG, complete with refbombing, and does anyone else find it very curious this account made it to exactly...

2022 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage. The refbombing has produced source after source where Lutel James is briefly mentioned...

SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC) delete per nom The REFBOMBing looks substantial and informative until you actually look at the claimed...

nomination because the article appears to be a carefully designed WP:REFBOMBing. Ultimatley, it's another article on a startup FinTech firm by an obviously...

Studies and Social Discovery Ventures. Lots of prose timelines supported by refbombing - David Gerard (talk) 11:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC) @David Gerard:, + afd...

discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom - refbombing with churnalism and press releases do not a notable company make. Separately...

this and redirecting, but given that most of the "sources" here are just refbombing, a sentence or two is all there is to be pulled from this whole thing...

rather than about this one per se, and all of the sources are merely refbombing its existence rather than being used to support any actual substance about...

elected as a parliamentarian or a legislator. Even, 23 sources make it WP:REFBOMB. Some about its candidacy, some are self published etc. It fails WP:GNG...

Repost. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:37, 21 May 2025 (UTC) Delete: Sad case of REFBOMBING; majorify of sources integrated into the article are unverified. —LastJabberwocky...

soft delete given the in-depth source review which clearly demonstrates refbombing and a complete lack of independent reliable in-depth sourcing, and which...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:REFBOMBing with WP:FICTREFerences to conceal lack of notability. One source cites...

BEFORE indicates no coverage that would meet CREATIVE or GNG. Creator is refbombing without regard to quality in an effort to have the notability tag removed...

all the sources are written by José Parejo, and despite the extensive refbombing there isn't anything approaching WP:CORPDEPTH in the rest (the exception...

someone in the wings trying to spin themselves as a major artist through WP:REFBOMBING - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC) The above...

published with the use of the framework.[5][6][7][8][9][10]" - nothing but refbombing. What I see it used in 6 publications, so what? " featured in multiple...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Although the article is an WP:REFBOMB, most of the sources are of the same news of his awards on student prize...

the wazoo. Creator of the work in question also created the article. WP:REFBOMBing is comparable to what the Allies did to Dresden. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 13:59...

Bearian (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC) Delete - despite the WP:REFBOMBING characteristic of this editor's creations, the subject does not appear...

August 2019 (UTC) Delete Does not even meet WP:GNG. Severe case of WP:REFBOMBING. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC) Delete I was going...

reliable and secondary at the same time. It seems to be a lot of WP:REFBOMBING. Article can be kept if notability can be proved, but at this point I'm...

Keep until I looked into the references, which appear to be mainly WP:REFBOMBING - of the two book reviews, the one in Total Politics is a press release...

mentions or don't mention the subject at all. Looks like a case of WP:REFBOMBING. C F A 💬 03:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

devolopement section is just episode reviews which I feel is boarderline WP:REFBOMBING, I went looking for sources to add and all I found was casting news, interviews...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A textbook example of WP:REFBOMB. Previously deleted under A7, now the references are almost exclusively...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is heavily reliant on REFBOMBING. A draft version of this article, titled "Sunny Bhandarkar," has already...

see no pass of WP:NPROF or any WP:SIGCOV. There is also considerable refbombing, a lot of peacock and some unsourced claims. This is the first new page...

provided. AnkurPl 16:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep there's a bit of refbombing with quote-only coverage, but these three (and this opinion piece) seem...

however, with all due respect, I feel that most of the content added is WP:REFBOMBing, given that all of the new "sources" appear to be translations of the...

ordinary job of updating the page. I could probably be accused of WP:REFBOMBING but I don't have the knowledge or time to do much better. Probably needs...

JSTOR · TWL) The article which was created by a sock and heavily relied on refbombing does not have sufficient coverage from independent and reliable secondary...

discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC) Delete. WP:REFBOMBing doesn't work. Not a notable company, at least at this point. soetermans...

ミラP 23:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Delete Another prime Billy Hathorn WP:REFBOMB, not seeing significant independent coverage for local talking head. Reywas92Talk...

(talk) 19:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Strong Delete: This article is a WP:REFBOMB of local sources, brief mentions, and conflict of interest. Most of the...

contribute to the WP:GNG or any applicable WP:SNG. Text shows significant WP:REFBOMBing. Sources that are significant are not reliable or not independent and...

the subject of this article directly. I see issues here with puffery via REFBOMB. The author also wrote an article about a company founded by this person...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Very heavy on WP:REFBOMB and WP:PEACOCK. Current sources are passing mentions. Previously deleted...

who's obviously very keen to keep it (still no COI declaration) has been refbombing the article. But with what? Take 26 and 27, about his mother. 26 is a...

people once owned his studio, etc etc etc. Strip away all the dross and refbombing, and this guy's just another painter and non-notable junior academic....

article. Svartner (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC) It's a saddening case of refbombing, though. Geschichte (talk) 17:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Delete: Most of the...

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] -- Trevj (talk) 09:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Refbombing isn't going to give notability to the article. Those links are either...

JSTOR · TWL) There are sources in the article. These made the article WP:REFBOMB. The article is full of references from unreliable sources, The article...

prevail on this version of the article. There seems to be an issue of WP:REFBOMBing as many of the sources barely mention, if at all, the subject matter and...

market research. I don't believe notability was clearly established by WP:REFBOMBING in this fashion, so here we are. It has not been proven that there is...

coverage to pass WP:GNG. Also the NYT source looks to be a case of WP:REFBOMB.Chagropango (talk) 09:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

press releases, and funding rounds (which don't connote notability). WP:REFBOMBing does not convince - David Gerard (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC) Note:...

a number of red flags: its sycophantic, promotional style, occasional refbombing, and a couple of the sources read like a brown envelope job to be frank...

above. I thought the long list of sources might be a horrible attempt at refbombing by Zvonko. when I see this that only has Dragan Bjelogrlic for the film...

Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable. Despite the massive refbomb I'm seeing no notability here. What has he done? He wrote a book that was...

I fear you may have misunderstood the very purpose of an AFD. While refbombing was/is a problem, that's not why it's here (it's only an explanation that...

date=2025-10-01&tag=36 Alice8961 (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Delete - refbombing the article does not establish notability. Coverage of fundraising for...

returns the organization's website. In-article references are mostly WP:REFBOMBING: Lots of primary sources to the org's website. Independent sources don't...

contain WP:SIGCOV of his career so the article meets WP:GNG. Issues of refbombing from previous incarnation of the article that were brought up in the previous...

interviews and press releases.)" Nothing seems to have changed since. Refbombing seems to be mainly low-quality sources, largely involving regurgitation...

(Though the material presented is often rather hard to swallow.) Wikipedia:REFBOMB Spray and pray Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (WP:RS) Wikipedia:Identifying...

article does not show sufficient sourcing to meet the WP:GNG (with some WP:REFBOMBing). The only reliable source in the article is the VentureBeat article,...

non-notable and fails sigcov. Additionally, the article shows signs of WP:REFBOMBING and the original contributor has since been banned for sockpuppetry. Schminnte...

demonstrate notability". Ataavi (talk) 20:31, 30 April 2026 (UTC) WP:REFBOMBing is not the way to go. In the case where there's five sources on a single...

Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom and the REFbombing of Selfcites which does not independently establish notability. Iljhgtn...

Also has cite links to a github page and other stuff so basically a WP:REFBOMB. Andre🚐 09:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Most sources are EP's and songs. There is at least one commercial. WP:REFBOMB consisting of 40 unacceptable sources for notability. The page seems intended...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Spam with huge amount of WP:REFBOMBs, fails WP:NCORP. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

2020 (UTC) Delete. Thinly-veiled spam, sourced to the type of PR-based refbombing that is commonplace in such submissions. Sourcing does not establish notability...

Baltimore Sun. Baltimore, Maryland. 1914-06-14. p. 2. Comment more WP:REFBOMBING. 1, 2, are the same story about the WP:1E of the sinking of U-85, 3 is...

notability as they are not about Prabal Kumar Basu himself - getting into WP:REFBOMBING territory here - Epinoia (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC) Nominator...

whether the newly added sources do cover the subject in detail, not just refbombing with simple mentions (no disrespect to Phil, I often do the same as a...

(talk) 07:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Delete Classic User:Billy Hathorn WP:REFBOMB without even a clear assertion of notability, much less substantive sources...

TonyBallioni (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC) Delete despite the promotional refbombing, no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The sources...

such sources. SL93 (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Reference review: Refbombing citations at the end of the article isn't a good thing to do. First reference...

DrowssapSMM (say hello) 00:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, bit of refbombing going on here. Fermiboson (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Delete WP:BOMBARDMENT...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional BLP created by SPA. A WP:REFBOMB of non-RSes, primary sources and press releases. Literally the only independent...

(talk) 12:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - likely paid-for spam given the refbombing. No comment on a repost speedy deletion. MER-C 14:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)...

Coolabahapple (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC) delete per nom, none of that REFBOMB is convincing - David Gerard (talk) 10:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Delete...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article has multiple issues. WP:REFBOMB], unreferenced filmography and credits, lack of WP:RS, and Wp:CHURNALISM...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to be a case of WP:REFBOMBING. Several references, but none of them seem to cover the biographee with...

MER-C 15:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Delete both the draft and the article, refbombing, lots of non-rs sources, not independently notable, etc. Tknifton (talk)...

biometric ID scheme in the world). Feedback taken on board regarding refbombing, will keep in mind for future edits. @Alexandermcnabb please could you...

sources from self published and routine coverage in the article made it WP:REFBOMB. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:54, 7 February...

Twintelle, who came from the same games but actively received analysis. It's refbombing with small quotes instead simply because she was in Smash.--Kung Fu Man...

and lesser-known sites. Den... (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Den, refbombing will not persuade editors that this passes WP:ORG. For example, your first...

that this organization provides. I only linked to two articles to avoid refbombing, but there are plenty more just in the Washington Post. I would suggest...

"non-kids" equivalents), and overtly promotional intent (and apparent WP:REFBOMBing) in the article's initial creation. To the extent that perhaps WP:STARTOVER...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:24, 2 August 2025 (UTC) Delete This is a classic WP:REFBOMB. Why are three sources needed to cite the collapse of Pac-12 and four to...

expand the article based on what the better refererences say about her. Refbombing is not a valid argument to delete. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:31, 13...

-for-a-tragic-mistake P.S. In other words, I sort of "bombed" at even REFbombing! P.P.S. As for someone's saying WP:SPIP, what really got me to write this...

see sustained coverage and does not meet academic notability. Carpet refbombing is a thing now, Sources 3-41 are to show it's received international coverage...

profile doesn't add much to notability; I'm otherwise seeing a lot of WP:REFBOMBING with sources of uncertain at best reliability. The article is in poor...

game character. Article fails WP:SIGCOV as the reception sources are a WP:REFBOMB and all are of poor quality, either based on listicles or individual sentence...

of the criteria at WP:NMUSIC. The article itself is a classic case of refbombing, complete with multiple facebook and youtube entries, and using the same...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:GNG. REFBOMB and promotional concerns…All of the sources are not adequate for notability...

already added it it to when nominating. This is just sloppy, unthoughtful refbombing and tagging, please do better. Thanks. Just Step Sideways from this world...

down, and before I cut down the references was a victim of extreme WP:REFBOMB overkill CiphriusKane (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

press releases from outlets of questionable quality. Another case of WP:REFBOMBING. Wolfson5 (talk) 06:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC) Keep Hello. I believe the...

done. Public relations people get their names in the media a lot. The WP:REFBOMBing only serves to confuse me in this case, we now have a six-sentence article...

else - no coverage in news sources, journals, books, etc. The overt WP:REFBOMBing and clear WP:COI/WP:PROMO issues are also very very difficult to overlook...

company. Sources in the article are mostly namedrops, with the aim of a WP:REFBOMB. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 21:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable privately owned airport. Despite a major WP:REFBOMB to primary sources, after a search I cannot find a single instance of significant...

Celestina007 14:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Redirect to bilibili. Despite copious refbombing, there is no evidence of notability independent of the parent article...

• (What did I screw up now?) 20:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC) A lot of the refbombing is actually just duplicate refs. Clearly whoever started the page didn't...

praise). WP:REFBOMBing doesn't make him notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC) You're most welcome, but how would REFBOMB apply exactly...

article.Superstars8547 (talk) 02:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC) Looks like WP:REFBOMBING of routine coverage of lyrical videos (Eg. the ones published around 14...

me up with confidence either). I also think this is a classic case of refbombing: citing a ton of sites to make the subject appear notable, but the vast...

(talk) 00:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Delete as nommed; despite the valiant refbombing, there doesn't appear to be a single solid source cited. (If the author...

(ᴛ) 15:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Redirect per Zxcvbnm. Looks a lot like WP:REFBOMB has happened here. The problem is that while significant effort has clearly...

OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Comment Looks like WP:REFBOMB in an attempt to appear notable. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:25, 9 November...

the article creator appears to be doubling down on the indiscriminate refbombing in an attempt to create an illusion that the subject topic is somehow...

The parent company is Moto, Inc. and FKG Oil Inc. is the subsidiary. Refbombing any sources concerning selling tobacco to minors, a robbery or theft at...

and probably much else besides. (I would have requested speedy, but the refbombing is so plentiful that I didn't think it would pass.) I'm including Turkey...

crypto media and promotional placements. Was previously sourced with a WP:REFBOMB of crypto sites, Forbes contributor blogs, passing mentions in media punditry...

devolopement section is just episode reviews which I feel is boarderline WP:REFBOMBING, I went looking for sources to add and all I found was casting news, interviews...

23 February 2021 (UTC) Delete: Above and also, seems like there is wp:refbomb. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 06:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

addition of potentially useful references that Classiclady has added. The refbombing will make it difficult for an impartial reviewer to review the references...

SIGCOV, and the additional materials could be viewed as a form of WP:REFBOMBING. Even the NZR source is technically not independent because it is the...

independent notability. Some of the worst examples of vapid commentary and REFBOMBing (4 sources commenting on liking her breasts??) I've seen in a while too...

no original research and that the refbombs are a good thing? Or that it does have original research and the refbombs are a bad thing? MasterMatt12 (talk)...

about relations with Turkey, and I had to chuck out a large section of WP:REFBOMB further reading that didn't pertain to relations with Turkey either. Geschichte...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Present coverage is not enough for GNG. A case of refbomb. There are not WP:RS present. Citterz (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)...

activist and lawyer. Fails WP:GNG. The over citations are a part of WP:REFBOMB. Kichu🐘 Discuss 17:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

general public with no archived version ([33]) Despite the continued WP:REFBOMBing in this article, I don't see a single source that qualifies as WP:SIGCOV...

reference of his own books, news regarding the road accident etc seems WP:REFBOMB.~ Nahid Talk 14:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC) Delete per above and because...

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete: despite the valiant refbombing, the sources cited do not provide sigcov of the company itself, hence...

for notability. Claims to be of a son of Sultan of Oman, but only has WP:REFBOMBS of fake sources and WP:SPS with no WP:RS. even if not a hoax, Notability...

reading through the article, I must admit that the article suffers from WP:REFBOMBing, and most if it just references plot, and not even always about this character...

Covid-19 and have just 4 sentences in it. This article is just a case of WP:REFBOMB as none of the sources are giving the enough sigcov to establish notability...

the world record – this is the very definition of BLP1E BIO1E (and WP:REFBOMBing). wjematherplease leave a message... 10:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Criteria...

it over the WP:SPORTCRIT bar in my opinion. The article suffers from refbombing and I have done some cleaning. Geschichte (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)...

September 2016 (UTC) comment he sounds like he may well be notable, but that REFBOMBing ... does anyone feel up to extracting the actual RSes? - David Gerard...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is an example of WP:REFBOMB. The sources in the article are from routine coverage or not reliable media...

23 October 2020 (UTC) Delete Notability not established- despite the WP:REFBOMB, it appears to be a typical education software company going about its...

anywhere in the entire article. (The article was also guilty of significant refbombing problems, citing Amazon and Barnes & Noble sales pages — which still aren't...

2023 (UTC) Delete per nom. and the other commenters above. A case of WP:REFBOMB. The subject lacks the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Despite the refbombing, it doesn't appear to meet GNG - the vast majority of the sources aren't...

me to but they all are unreliable sources. See WP:RS. Furthermore WP:REFBOMBING isn’t going to demonstrate notability, lastly WP:NCORP remains the criteria...

00:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Delete: WP:PROMO, Article carries a lot of WP:REFBOMB and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Tuesden (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Keep:...

this back in 2007 with only primary sources. The nom is kind to suggest refbombing (which suggests RS overkill) when the real issue here is a lack of secondary...

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete: despite the valiant refbombing, the sources cited do not provide sigcov of the company itself, hence...

single piece of fiction, the reception section is just the result of WP:REFBOMBing, where a multitude of extremely trivial mentions are jammed in to give...

month ago with the promise of more sources. Unfortunately it's still a WP:REFBOMB of brief mentions, directory listings, sources of dubious stature, press...

independent of her. This article attempts to establish notability through WP:REFBOMBING and reads like a CV. -- PS. I found another Rachel Galvin when performing...

rewriting the article. 21.colinthompson (talk) 22:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC) WP:REFBOMBing the article does not establish notability (though the present article...

some other references. (I hope people won't think it's too much like WP:REFBOMBing - anyone is of course free to delete any.) The most useful I've added...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic case of WP:REFBOMBing to high heaven to give an illusion of notability. Despite the edit summary...

October 2016 (UTC) delete per nom - are there any good sources in that REFBOMB? - David Gerard (talk) 11:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC) Delete as typical corporate...

contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Delete. With the refbombing and trivia overload the article needs blowing up as it's an unsalvageable...

- Obviously passes WP:GNG. Needs major cleanup though. Can you say WP:REFBOMB? SnottyWong converse 23:46, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Keep: I think this individual...

corporate/business meetings" each year so how many should we include on Wikipedia? To refbomb an article with a lot of primary sources to present notability is actually...

article reeks of WP:REFBOMBING to give the illusion of notability. Once you reach Reception and legacy, you truly see how all of the REFBOMB-ing and CRUFT-ing...

apparently copiously sourced, a closer look demonstrates this is pure WP:REFBOMBing. Of the 31 sources, 8 are press releases, another 8 are self-cites, three...

support the text in the article. And the level of FV issues and apparent REFBOMBing is more than a little problematic. As raised by Bastun, Spleodrach and...

references to Facebook WP:FACEBOOK and one to Amazon.com is definitely WP:REFBOMBING - I couldn't check the other WP:NONENG references, but if the multiple...

episodes of Unusual Suspects - most of the article references are WP:REFBOMBING to WP:MASK lack of notability - the article is little more than promotional...

some songs on iTunes. Original version of this article consisted of WP:REFBOMB links mainly to copies of press releases from his own small company. Self...

to TWICE Videography, to match the category. I'm suspicious of the WP:REFBOMB here, it's possible that this is notable, but it's more likely that it's...

text on a page that didn't have very much to say. Definitely a lot of RefBombing. Dorama285 17:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

justification for being split from the East Midlands Railway article. Eastmain refbombing with press releases actually makes me more convinced this isn't a notable...

2021 (UTC) Delete/Redirect Impressively referenced, but basically a WP:REFBOMB. Lacks the amount of WP:SIGCOV to demonstrate notability.ZXCVBNM (TALK)...

[4]. There should be some reference cleaning to wipe out the massive WP:REFBOMBING though, a lot of it is puffery, poorly written articles or duplicates...

in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The REFBOMBING is a facade to create a mirage of notability. A WP:BEFORE search confirms...

Ginsberg (talk) 18:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC) Delete or redirect - a refbombing of bad sources - David Gerard (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC) Comments...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not pass WP:GNG. WP:REFBOMB. Kadı Message 22:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

for notability. Claims to be of a son of Sultan of Oman, but only has WP:REFBOMBS of fake sources and WP:SPS with no WP:RS. article was started with edit...

The.sparrowhawk (talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Delete: WP:REFBOMB of trivial mentions doesn't get her past WP:BIO. Vrac (talk) 03:40, 26...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Other then some passing mentione in the refs (WP:REFBOMB as article contain 33 refs), i didn't find any significant coverage about...

find reviews of these shows that give opinions on his performances and WP:REFBOMB the article with those, but TV shows normally aren't reviewed by the press...

or wait for a time period to delete. This is advertising and annoying. Refbombing is a good tactic because some (and those that don't check) will think...

However, the content creators out there, I'd like to actively discourage REFBOMBing articles. It is used as a negative in AFD discussions and can make finding...

established notability outside of that, and the article itself is full of refbombing and casual namedrops. Ravenswing 17:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC) Keep: Named...

fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Article also appears to be a victim of WP:REFBOMBing. I suggest a WP:SALT for this one. Anwegmann (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2025...

26 July 2015 (UTC) Redirect: per nom to Gemalto (a disaster of a COI WP:REFBOMB itself, but notable). Vrac (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This...

BD2412 T 06:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:BASIC, massive REFBOMBING is unconvincing. Mztourist (talk) 10:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Comment...

don't need to see 11 sources confirming that he has given some speeches, that's just WP:REFBOMBING.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)...

Curbon7 (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. A case of WP:REFBOMB. Although there are numerous citations, virtually all are either non-WP:RS-compliant...

Businesspeople and Ohio. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC) Delete - REFBOMB of mentions that aren't actually about the subject in any substantial way...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Pretty obvious press release sources and refbomb case. Going by this revision: ref 6 has a disclaimer in the end. Ref 11...

independent sources. Also see WP:REFBOMBING Theroadislong (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC) I'm very familiar with WP:REFBOMBING as a recent changes patroller...

The sources are mere mentions of her. The media section is filled with refbombs of her appearances on TV, which in an WP:INTERVIEW style repeat her words...

22:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom, another Billy Hawthorn WP:REFBOMB composed of passing local mentions and family obituary. Reywas92Talk 00:06...

independent anywhere else I could find. Article has a severe case of WP:REFBOMB. Lowercaserho (talk) 01:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC) Delete - There are a couple...

see a single independent in-depth WP:RS source. A classic case of WP:REFBOMBING. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Narky Blert (talk) 10:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC) -...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Leaving aside the REFBOMBing, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability...

references to make the subject look notable, but it really comes across as WP:REFBOMB. ℯxplicit 00:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC) Pinging Megalibrarygirl (I mistakenly...

history, even though a lot of spam and REFBOMB cleanup was performed in the article, it still suffers from WP:REFBOMB and my spot check on the refs did not...

statement --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 03:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC) delete per nom - the REFBOMB is extensive but doesn't stand up to examination - David Gerard (talk)...

references are primary sources from the creator and appears to be a WP:REFBOMB), I see zero evidence in RSes that individual episodes receive any substantive...

And the vast majority of what you've linked is UGC or primary. Nice refbomb. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2023 (UTC) I am undecided on...

Weak keep Most of them are transfers, but I found one source in the WP:REFBOMB that's probably not = "Ξανά στην ομάδα της καρδιάς του ο Σμοΐλης, στην...

someone really needs to come in with a shovel and remove all of the WP:REFBOMBing, WP:NCORP says, ... please consider whether they have had any significant...

business, Flanor. gidonb (talk) 03:50, 17 July 2021 (UTC) Delete: Per Nom, WP:REFBOMB, WP:PROVEIT, and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. The first reference...

brought up in the 2015 discussion are all clearly trivial coverage, WP:REFBOMBing if you will. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC) Leaning keep and...

article. The citations given in the articles is just a clear case of WP:REFBOMB. None of the sources are also not covering about her in depth. Its primary...

The sources in the article at the time of AfD nomination were mostly refbombing. The BLP issues regarding the loss of license are not a reason to delete...

WP:SIGCOV about this person. The article (& Draft:Hasan Hamid) is full of WP:REFBOMB. Every single refs are written by the subject himself, which proves the...

Spider) 19:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Delete and salt: I agree that this is refbombing to gull careless voters into thinking this meets the GNG, that the sources...

December 2015 (UTC) Delete – Too soon. There are now a lot of sources after a refbomb, but most of them are interviews or superficial coverage in self-congratulatory...

were this noteworthy there should be stuff to meet WP:NMUSIC, but this WP:REFBOMB isn't it - David Gerard (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Delete --...

" DGG ( talk ) 18:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC) Delete. Talk about WP:REFBOMBING. I looked at all 31 citations (sic - there are some duplicates) in the...

page was also tagged for notability concerns via WP:NPP. Despite the WP:REFBOMB in the lead, I don’t really think all those pass GNG. -2pou (talk) 06:47...

pasted material (noted) or at best close paraphrasing, 2)- some apparent refbombing, where some added references do not back up material (noted), 3)- Primary...

offer an objective AfD recommendation in the face of this type of WP:REFBOMBing. Guliolopez (talk) 20:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) Comment. I note that a...

TWL) Fails WP:NPOL He never won any election the article made with WP:REFBOMB Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  14:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

(UTC) Delete, with a caveat. Virtually all the references seem to be WP:REFBOMBs unrelated to the subject, and I can't find a single source about this person...

of sources but rather what the sources actually say, see WP:REFBOMBING This not REFBOMBING because the sources are exactly on the subject (see this discussion...

Shellwood (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC) Delete or Draftify. Horrible refbombing, I cannot see the wood for the trees. I tried a little cleanup, but gave...

while there are a lot of references in the article it is (approaching WP:REFBOMB), they are trivial mentions, team news and match reports JW 1961 Talk 19:01...

list of guests should be included in this instance. Also, please read WP:REFBOMB. You shouldn't need six references to verify a single uncontroversial statement...

Celestina007 (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC) Delete no reliable source , WP:REFBOMB and obvious WP:PROMOTION castorbailey (talk) 06:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is one of the most elaborate cases of WP:REFBOMBing I've seen. This article on a small nonprofit has an astonishing 46 well-formatted...

Fu Man (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2026 (UTC) Keep There's some degree of refbombing going on, but the article does pass GNG from the looks of the discussion...

is a trivial mention, a sales site, or a 404. The article smacks of WP:REFBOMBing. I chainsawed out a "trivia" section (really, we're still doing that shit...

Council is an autopass for WP:NPOL and the rest of the article reads as a WP:REFBOMB resume largely sourced to his own campaign material. Sources are not significant...

and removed 6 or 7 references that failed verification, and there's WP:REFBOMBing); WP:SPA editor likely has a WP:COI. May not pass WP:NPOL. Curb Safe Charmer...

of FILMMAKER has clearly been met. After sorting through the veritable refbombing above, there's even some GNG-level sourcing like this and maybe this,...

FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom. Anther WP:REFBOMB with nothing actually establishing notability. FoxyGrampa75, what is PCC...

but there's only one of them (which I will admit I missed in the WP:REFBOMBing) and don't you need two such sources to establish notability? * Pppery...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject is not notable. Case of WP:REFBOMB with references discussing his "foundation" instead. Being a philanthropist...

Storchy (talk) 06:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Delete despite the heroic refbombing, the sources cited are a mix of passing mentions, appointment and award...

attention both by Scope creep and I the other day that their rampant WP:REFBOMBing isn't acceptable. They've demonstrated a clear mentality that more references...

this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Delete The refbombing doesn't amount to sigcov, hence fails WP:GNG. As unelected candidate only...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article's reference makes in WP:REFBOMB. The person was not elected as a legislator or parliamentarian. Fails WP:GNG...

confirming a "Siege of Etawah" is a recognized name for this event. The refbombing is obvious, if an editor finds sources for the "Siege of Etawah" with...

making NO MENTION WHATEVER of the subject. And representing a form of WP:REFBOMBing. These "references" certainly do not support a claim to notability. (Like...

advertisement. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Delete: WP:REFBOMBing to hide the fact of unnotability of subject. It fails both WP:NMUS and...

Finance, and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC) Delete this WP:REFBOMB, sources are all either non-independent primary org profiles, or passing...

appears to be defined by us, not reliable sources. It's a bit of a WP:REFBOMB situation. Many of the novels are also self-categorized by us rather than...

I'm sick and tired of your assumption that filling in filmographies is refbombing. Adding an ANN cast announcement for Berserk the Golden Age is just that...

Jonathunder (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC) This is a clear case of WP:REFBOMBing, a kind of gaming of the system that makes it very hard work for anyone...

16 April 2020 (UTC) Delete per John Pack Lambert. Classic case of WP:REFBOMB. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Have you read all of the...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC) *Delete A lot of WP:REFBOMB and not much substance. Alpateya (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC) Alpateya...

As, frankly, I wonder if I can leave aside the years of WP:COI and WP:REFBOMB concerns that I've struggled with on this title. And, perhaps, any !vote...

Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC) Delete notwithstanding the latest refbombing of every WP:PASSINGMENTION available. Also sanction Supersumu for ToU/PAID...

2022 (UTC) Delete. This article has undergone a remarkable amount of refbombing, including with unusable-for-GNG and BLP-violating sources, apparently...

independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Your refbombing is mostly passing mentions at best. Antonopoulos' explicitly promotional...

most do not even mention) the subject of this article. In that sense, WP:REFBOMBING is a significant concern. There are also WP:COI, WP:SOAPBOX and similar...

pending for 73 days) Pass Had one piece of sig cov. Also tone issues and refbombing. Mme Maigret (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Declined Draft:Ward Botsford...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG. Refbomb of brief mentions in blogs, self-published sources, programming announcements...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Perfect example of a WP:REFBOMB for a run-of-the-mill venue. Article is sourced to the restaurant's own...

Non-notable small airport. I can't find any significant coverage, despite a REFBOMB to primary sources. All I get are databases and primary sources. Considering...

(UTC) Delete lack of reliable sources to establish WP:GNG. You can WP:REFBOMB as much as you want, but at the end of the day you can't will someone to...

guidelines, WP:ENN and WP:MADEUP. (I'm not going to get into the WP:REFBOMBINGing and WP:VER and WP:TALKO issues. Suffice to say that I think we're beyond...

(UTC) Delete as it stands - a flurry of passing mentions in RSes, a WP:REFBOMBing of low-quality press-release churnalism, and I just removed a pile of...

sources. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC) You are duped by refbombing. --Altenmann >talk 22:22, 7 March 2026 (UTC) Delete. A handful of sentences...

the person's notability, it's useful to remove excessive, unreliable, REFBOMBING sources. Anyway, the sources were returned back by other editors, and...

just brief mentions and are not good at establishing notability per WP:REFBOMB. Sahaib (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC) Keep Enough coverage per above...

checked several sources and found that they didn't even mention Wunder. Refbombing doesn't make GNG. -- ferret (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

Kai'ro to AFC. The two Amaka articles both pertain to a singer, and have refbombs at their end. NotReallySoroka (talk) 03:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC) Additionally...

with a WP:COI on a subject who fails WP:NPOL. In a classic case of WP:REFBOMB very few, if any, of the sources actually contribute to WP:GNG. The lead...

#12 - PR from IANS. REF #13 - same REF #3 cited again, perhaps for WP:REFBOMBING REF #14 - slide shows, unrelaible REF #15 - a segment of NDTV about a...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC) Certainly some refbombing going on here. At a glance, I think the topic has encyclopaedic value...

if the subject is notable (it's hard to tell from the aforementioned refbombing). Multiple AI-tells and other issues persist despite clean-up, indicating...

JSTOR · TWL) There are 95 sources in the article. These made the article WP:REFBOMB. The article is full of references from unreliable sources, youtube link...

immediately submitted for review. The article itself is a classic example of WP:REFBOMBing and almost certinly WP:UPE. A previous version of Tungsten Branding was...

TWL) Doesn't meet WP:FILMMAKER. Most of the references are borderline WP:REFBOMBING which doesn't prove notability or support the text; for instance, Sambrenxx‬...

sources do not entirely say what they are cited for. It also contains Refbomb, and some of the claim were unsourced. It needs a heavy clean up to fulfill...

26 February 2020 (UTC) Delete or at least get rid of the spam and WP:REFBOMBing with NINE citations to his own press releases. The rest of the sources...

WP:ORGDEPTH. This lack of coverage is also reflected in the article itself. WP:REFBOMBING has been used in the introductory sentence, citing references that are...

second time. The article's reception relies on particularly heavy WP:REFBOMBing, with one of the most content-full sources being a bachelor's thesis of...

demonstrated. PROD was reverted last month and it seems the refs are refbombing passing mentions of the company. It doesn't help that its name is similar...

the article is loaded with puffery and seems to be suffering from WP:REFBOMB. Bascially what we have here is a vanity article about an attorney who...

created substantial articles for the recent officeholders, a few feel like refbombs for NPOL failures; even as big as Cook County is it's hard to say that...

@Styyx I see why you are pulling the Refbomb card, I read up on it. However, I think this is not a case of refbomb because even Daily Sabah, a reliable...

artists in London exhibiting on the doorstep of Frieze. Although the refbombing might indicate a Hey award, it might be too soon. She Zine intersectional...

August 2018 (UTC) Delete - Since nomination, there are now a lot of WP:REFBOMBS, but these seem like mostly routine primary listings or similar. Primary...

Delete. This has all the trademarks of self-promotion (such as gratuitous refbombing and an advertorial tone), despite the creator's refusal to admit as much...

almost nothing to show notability. This is one of the worst cases of refbombing I've seen for a while. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)...

businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. I reviewed all sources in this WP:REFBOMB and found no WP:SIGCOV in any of them or in BEFORE search; all coverage...

to a sentence about them getting a STEM classroom just comes off like refbombing. That said, I'm not going to be super upset if just the article for Wisconsin...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is heavily reliant on REFBOMBING. The information currently available on the subject is limited and does...

have no blp information do not need referencing, its just timewasting refbombing, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Keep: It sounds like...

notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Delete: WP:REFBOMB but no WP:SIGCOV. UtherSRG (talk) 12:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Delete agree...

notable publishers of Pakistan and Gulf countries. So, there is no WP:REFBOMBING now. Hassan Ali Kasi has received many national and international award...

delete. Malay231 (talk) 07:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC) Delete A case of WP:REFBOMB that uses mostly primary sources and directories to make the subject seem...

Lamona has it 100% right. There's no WP:SIGCOV here, just a bunch of WP:REFBOMBING using non-independent or primary sources. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk)...

wording and WP:REFBOMBS are different, it cannot be a G4 speedy... Non-notable, just as it was a month and a bit ago, with WP:REFBOMBS and no establishment...

Monathephantom (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2026 (UTC) There are also cases of refbombing, usage of unreliable sources, and the entire reception section has to...

US-Verified (talk) 08:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC) This is what we call a WP:REFBOMB. It was almost all press releases and press release reprints - these fail...

Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Delete Does not pass NPOL, WP:REFBOMB does not have sources beyond local news. Reywas92Talk 01:37, 17 May 2019...

AfC. Originally PRODed by me, dePROD by an IP editor who proceeded to refbomb the article with citations to sources that do not mention the subject,...

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:52, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Having done a stack of cleanup, refbombing removal and source merging I have changed my vote. The claims in the page...

before the WP:HEY. gidonb (talk) 21:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Sorry, your refbombing is worthless and waste of Wikipedian's time. I took trouble to open a...

☎ ✎ 18:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Delete: this looks like a promotional refbomb. "Buisiness exists, business does business things" is an accurate way to...

2021 (UTC) Delete - WP:GNG failure is still apparent in spite of the refbombing of passing mentions and articles that don't even mention the subject Spiderone(Talk...

added maybe 15 refs, but if I'll add more it'll look nothing less than refbombing (as it already kinda looks). Radioactive (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)...

scope_creepTalk 07:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC) Comment Looking at the WP:REFBOMB that the previous editor has posted: [18] Press-release. Also fails WP:CORPDEPTH...

account, since she is definitely real; more of a sock chorus." The WP:REFBOMBing in the article, e.g. [4], seems to further emphasize a lack of sufficient...

comparable US-based publication. I agree with concerns of Aseleste about WP:REFBOMBing, but as usual, WP:DINC. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)...

individual locations appeared in. There is a pretty heavy case of WP:REFBOMBing here as well, as the same handful of sources are being used as inline...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is a refbomb of press releases and articles which do even mention the person, has otherwise...

undergone some cleanup, enough to make it still not good but acceptable. The refbombing is annoying, but I think the current draft review environment teaches...

perhaps key findings can be mentioned at bengal cat but here it's just a WP:REFBOMB. Quotes by Kaelin is NOT SigCov on Kaelin's biography. Does not appear...

source. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. Refbombing insignificant sources that provide passing mention, related topics (such...

delete - distinct lack of WP:CORPDEPTH and non-press-releases in that WP:REFBOMB - David Gerard (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

too many references to support a single claim is a bad practice, see WP:REFBOMB. The quality matters, not the quantity. For example, the FotoHits reference...

blog. Source search is turning up the same items, likely injected as a refbomb to help save the article. I might have said draftify instead, but it seems...

business, but not a notable one, and the only source of substance in this WP:REFBOMB is a family-written obituary. Reywas92Talk 06:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Note:...

Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Delete the horrific refbomb ought to be reason enough to delete this. I see no inherent notability...

editors seem to SPAs and the reference section appears to be a case of WP:REFBOMB. wikitigresito (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC) wikitigresito Note: This...

writing out every little bit of these people's resumes (with a mini-WP:REFBOMB) to seem notable at first glance. WilliamJE has been doing well going after...

2022 (UTC) Keep Enough references to passes WP:GNG, Though i have fixed Refbomb but the tone still looks like an advertisement. DMySon (talk) 06:21, 24...

reliable, independent sources (?)? Because I don't see them beneath the refbombing. According to the article history, other editors don't see them either...

(talk) 05:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC) Delete Virtually unreferenced (the refbombing supports the few songs mentioned, nothing else) vanity/promo piece; nothing...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional UPE article with WP:REFBOMB created by a blocked sock (part of this sock farm) that doesn't look notable...

America1000 07:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC) delete per nom, I don't trust that REFBOMB at all - David Gerard (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC) keep That the...

than a large number of weak ones — this draft is a textbook example of REFBOMBING. And by 'weak', I mean anything put out by the subject themselves, including...

September 2016 (UTC) Delete. There's clearly been a very professional WP:REFBOMBing job done here, but none of the cited sources, nor any that I can find...

October 2016 (UTC) delete per nom. Is there anything of value in that REFBOMB? - David Gerard (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) keep This page should...

TexasEditor1 (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC) @TexasEditor1: for starters, REFBOMBING the draft with 70+ sources certainly doesn't help. Can you tell us the...

from the Pittsburgh and Annapolis papers? they are hardly examples of refbombing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC) The "School science contest"...

cleaning to remove puffery/peacock/weasel as well as irrelevant promo and refbombing. It was pretty bad, hopefully now better but may need monitoring to revert...

failure to find significant coverage of this intersection despite major WP:REFBOMBing and the attempt to split this out from the topic of Starburst Plaza, which...

I would like to also mention WP:REFBOMB here.Kichu🐘 Need any help? 09:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Not sure how a refbomb claim is relevant to 18 sources...

Sources above are routine match reports, routine contract signings and refbombing an alleged animal cruelty incident. Quero doesn't pass WP:CRIME either...

indication why they are connected to this person at at all. Garden variety WP:REFBOMBing to prop up a non-notable musician article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)...

just uses him in a jokey mashup manner. I suspect a great deal of WP:REFBOMBing is also in play, as this is far from the only example where the cited...

WP:AUDience, the rest being a combination of little snippets that read as a WP:REFBOMB, with many being typical guidebook mentions among many other restaurants...

and WP:CRYSTAL. That's not really enough to pass WP:NCORP. A bit of a REFBOMB of passing mentions and yellow-rated sources that can't be used for notability...

that didn't even mention the subject and broached multiple criteria of WP:REFBOMB. Even unreliable sources don't show a lot of mentions of "Vince Coglianese"...

Arab Emirates. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Delete - a WP:REFBOMB of corporate spam, no sign it passes WP:NCORP. Anyone thinking to keep...

biographical sourcing, no evidence of notability in the third-party sources, a REFBOMB of primary sources and it's by an SPA. It would need much more third-party...

Elanbassi (afd) who are behind this film. it's a non notable film. the refbombing on who the producer is is telling to the intent of this article (look...

deletions, and recreated this in the main space. Despite the valiant WP:REFBOMBING, not one of the sources cited meets the WP:GNG standard, let alone the...

the references are the longest section of the article it raises the WP:REFBOMBING alarm for me. Vladimir.copic (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Response...

access the source. when presenting it. Otherwise, it could be considered refbombing (that does happen) but assuming good faith is more than a token statement...

that section certainly contribute to notability. While there is some WP:REFBOMBing, overall, I think their notability is shown. Link20XX (talk) 18:50, 20...

Purely promotional article from a clear COI account. Routine/local coverage refbomb. On an unrelated note: how is AdvantageProducer not banned yet? 157.235...

links are so blatantly inappropriate that I'm not sure if this wasn't WP:REFBOMBing. Still, let's go through. On sources you claim cover NAUTHOR #3 IWMBuzz...

and things related to Josh Simons. We don't have WP:GNG here - just a WP:REFBOMB. asilvering (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP:OFFCRIC. Subject fails to meet the wider requirements of WP:GNG. All WP:REFBOMBs in the article is just about squads selection of different teams, but lacks...

that it includes films about as well as set in outer space, no need to refbomb it as there are plenty of confirming refs on the linked articles. It is...

TWL) All right, I'll bite, this article is probably not notable. The refbombing makes it really hard to assess the quality of the sources, but even then...

article, lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources (despite the WP:REFBOMB). MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

outstanding problems right before this AfD. I'll clear out a few more of the WP:REFBOMB issues but this looks like a viable stub now. -- asilvering (talk) 19:04...

or ones that merely mention the topic don't qualify. That is just a WP:REFBOMB with many insignificant sources.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:58, 18 September 2019...

of India, Deadspin, Vice and more. Needs cleanup as it was under a WP:REFBOMBING. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

I haven't checked every single reference, since this is a case of WP:REFBOMB, but I don't see anything that looks like significant coverage in multiple...

2012 (but usually when the sourcing is that thin, it doesn't get into REFBOMB territory the way it is here), but in the Wikipedia of 2024 we require...

sources are either about his company or press releases. The article was WP: REFBOMB to confer Notability and yet not notable. All the awards too are run-of-the-mills...

that was much more recent and global; that takes precedence. You are refbombing more routine trivial announcementsd. No number of functionally identical...

'famous for being famous', which probably at least in part explains the WP:REFBOMBING with flaky sources. Fails WP:GNG. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:46, 16 September...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Promotional article. WP:REFBOMB looks good, but is passing mentions, non-RS or promotional. Was deleted...

published, unreliable sources and political activities made the article WP:REFBOMB. The article fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems like WP:PROMO, WP:REFBOMB can easily be observed. The fact that he is the first verified user in...

Delete- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Those non-WP:RS are an indicative of WP:REFBOMB. Retro music11 (talk) 21:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...

but not to biographical or critical analysis of her work. With so much refbombing, it's hard to tell what is there, so WP:TNT seems like the proper route...

with a wealth of information and sources on the subject) at least one WP:REFBOMB was left unaddressed; multiple other MoS issues (m-dashes, insufficient...

(UTC) Delete All of the references I've checked of this 63 citation WP:REFBOMB are all trivial mentions, unreliable sources, or both. Claims like "the...

the English coverage ([1], [2]) is pretty thin despite the copious WP:REFBOMBing. I will also say that the nom seems pretty WP:PRECOCIOUS. AleatoryPonderings...

well. HeyitsmeFellen (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Delete: There's WP:REFBOMB all over but no significant coverage. Also based on messages left at User...

creator blocked for socking, I was fully expecting to be investigating a WP:REFBOMBing. But even the minor citations seem to be relevant minor citations, with...

19:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC) Merge Per nom; tremendous amounts of WP:REFBOMBing does not a notable article make. The article looks highly detailed on...

research to fill the space. This article is actually a textbook example of WP:REFBOMB, with the overwhelming majority of the articles/websites cited mentioning...

there are actually articles about the company, then accusation of WP:REFBOMBing would be inappropriate, since all information need to be sourced (some...

having reviewed works does not meet AUTHOR. Additions to the article are WP:REFBOMB: "...to load an article up with as many sources as possible without regard...

article do not represent significant critical attention WP:TOOSOON. The refbombing of the paragraph "As both a legal expert and a widely-exhibited contemporary...

2020 (UTC) Delete The sources supporting the article are the usual WP:REFBOMBing of poor sources that are easy for companies to obtain. The great majority...

approach the volume necessary to claim GNG — the sourcing pretty much just WP:REFBOMBs one single fact about his life with practically every single text hit that...

deletion discussion. I don't think what I've engaged in is "refbombing." The refbombing page warns against citing esteemed sources in vague ways so as...

placed at the end of broad-ranging sentence" could be seen as a form of WP:REFBOMBing. Guliolopez (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

contribs) 08:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC) There are 18 sources; 7 sources are REFBOMB, trying to support the assertion that he lead a fundraiser. But from the...

already added.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Sorry, but WP:REFBOMBing an article with passing mentions and primary quotations from the subject...

"organic" sunscreen, which makes this a clear-cut case of WP:SYNTH (and WP:REFBOMB; that "certified organic production practices" section is near-unreadable)...

WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMO. All the passing mentions and trivial WP:REFBOMBING does not hide the fact that this is not notable enough to have a page...

has been going on for years, making me feel like this is a bit of a WP:REFBOMB situation. On the other hand, Z poetry exists on Russian Wikipedia. One...

daSupremo 15:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Delete: no durable notability with WP:REFBOMBing galore. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Delete even looking...

Wikipedia for guidance as well but it's clear that that article is a WP:REFBOMB of sources that make no mention of Bironze. When an article has the title...

this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Delete refbombs, wow. non-notable.Oaktree b (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Delete as...

Nigerian businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. The sources in this WP:REFBOMB are limited to: Regurgitated press releases: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]...

(talk • contribs) 15:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete - despite the WP:REFBOMB of sources about the trailers in two different languages and the sources...

per WP:BASIC, many refs are to his own articles and social media: WP:REFBOMBING in order to WP:MASK lack of notability - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk)...