Wikipedia:PROVIT

Search Results: Wikipedia:PROVIT

Redirect to:

Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden of evidence

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

To a project page: This is a redirect from any page inside or outside of project (Wikipedia: or WP:) space to any page within the project namespace (not to a project talk page). The above category link leads to a list of redirects from inside project space. Redirects from outside project space are automatically sorted to Category:Redirects to project namespace.

To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.

From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Jumat, 2026-08-07 17:14:55

In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means that people can check that facts or claims correspond to reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Provitincanada/Archive

Kamis, 2022-03-10 06:26:42

spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) ProvitGroup (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pippa Middleton (2nd nomination)

Kamis, 2026-01-08 18:02:11

say a tad arrogant), thinking must be resisted. OldProvit (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)— OldProvit (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/May 2021

Jumat, 2021-05-21 03:36:11

463 Would anyone else like to see more documentation of ProveIt, viz., User Tutorial? Can someone speak to the various templates installed in ProvIt?...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Agapetos angel

Sabtu, 2024-07-13 11:55:10

01:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC) One making the following assertion needs to provit: Finally, another proof that I am not the disruption as purported is also...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 April 30

Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:26:49

say a tad arrogant), thinking must be resisted. OldProvit (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)— OldProvit (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 September 3

Minggu, 2023-03-12 04:23:10

editor optionally can post as [[Wikipedia:Proveit|PROVEIT]]. Also, Wikipedia:PROVIT would seem to stand or fall with this RfD. This should be taken into account...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 26

Kamis, 2023-02-09 18:55:28

redundant. Kolindigo 04:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Speedy merge Delete (amended per Provit below)only contains Tara Lipinski! Johnbod 12:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Merge...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 7

Senin, 2022-10-10 09:51:06

for deletion is not explained. The category seems notable and not POV. As ProvIt states, what is the problem? --- Safemariner 15:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 25

Jumat, 2023-03-03 14:52:19

obvious and I can do more constructive edits, then I'll invoke: Wikipedia:PROVIT#Burden_of_evidence. After all the purpose of WP:ORN is to ensure editors...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1174

Selasa, 2026-07-14 20:42:31

to some citation. --TheMaxM1 (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC) See WP:PROVIT. Having an impression that there’s support for your edit isn’t enough. You...

Click to read more »