especially when not directly relevant to Wikipedia. Shortcut WP:POLEMICWP:POLEMIC Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing...

AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Polemic Articles for deletion/Polemic (2nd nomination) Polemic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...

No consensus, defaulting to Keep. NawlinWiki 20:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Polemic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

User:SonPraises/ubx/Prolife (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:POLEMIC. Gamaliel (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Keep: This is just a neutrally...

WP:UP#POLEMIC outnumber and are stronger than those invoking the guideline. If in the future, this list would turn into something objectionable per POLEMIC...

User:Winkelvi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) The page is ripe with WP:POLEMIC violations. The editor in question has also been blocked indefinitely [1]...

for deleting. Too often a reference to polemic simply means WP:IDONTLIKEIT. This really is a hateful polemic. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 22 March...

autobiography falls under WP:POLEMIC. wumbolo ^^^ 20:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC) Delete - As nominator states, this is a polemic against a politician, that...

history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC) Does not violate WP:POLEMIC. Is the intention to forbid userboxes...

(UTC) Seems a clear violation of WP:POLEMIC.CombatWombat42 (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:50, 17 October...

20:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC) WP:UP#POLEMIC IQinn (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:UP#POLEMIC, which includes, "Material that can be...

from their userpage, which was inexplicably tagged with WP:POLEMIC - what exactly is polemic about an Oldsmobile logo? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2021...

a polemic in draft space that is unrelated to Wikipedia by a user who has no other edits. Polemic, meet Ms. bit bucket. Bit bucket, meet Mr. Polemic. Robert...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:Polemic User pages are not to be used for this purpose per WP:POLEMIC. I support Scott's right to express his...

Wikipedia, this seems pretty clearly polemic to me. I believe there was a previously established consensus that polemic userboxes are not allowed here. Attempts...

Courts for Violence against Women or its talk page, the article is very polemic and two Spanish editors user:Varano and me have contested the article,...

Joseph2302 (talk) 19:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Delete both - yeesh. UBCR/POLEMIC — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Delete both – per my...

Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC. Enemies list that serves no legitimate purpose and will not be (and was...

Wikipedia:No personal attacks § Removal of personal attacks Wikipedia:POLEMIC Wikipedia:WikiBullying Wikipedia:Coatrack articles Category:Criticism of...

User:Junglecat/marriage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:POLEMIC. Gamaliel (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Keep: Just like I stated...

antisemitism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ This is an inflammatory polemic that argues that Zionists allied themselves with the Nazi Party. One of...

regarding user space page. On that page, it was indicated that WP:POLEMIC likely applies, and, considering that the "evidence" might go stale after...

Kenatipo's userpage is violating guidelines found at WP:UP#POLEMIC. Userpages are not to be used display the percieved faults of those one...

06:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Delete No matter how subtle, a WP:POLEMIC is still a WP:POLEMIC. Oh look, my opponent asked for my side to be sanctioned at...

encyclopdia. Legacypac (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as per WP:POLEMIC. Unnecessarily divisive/provocative and unrelated to Wikipedia. — Rhododendrites...

a half ago to collect diffs on me. I believe this is a violation of WP:POLEMIC and serves no purpose any longer by this point. If I should be bringing...

User:EmonyRanger/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Old polemic about the article on Lena Dunham from a long-gone user. Wikipedia userspace...

Conduct (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This is unnecessary WP:POLEMIC, as the author is not involved in any conduct dispute resolution process...

21:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC) Attack page in userspace. Violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC. Not likely to be used "imminently" as Hammy64000 is indefinitely blocked...

diffs. The delete arguments are mostly covered by a thorough read of WP:POLEMIC. 10 to 6 respectively by the numbers (i.e. ~63% favoring keep). The deletion...

with implications that certain admins are part of a cabal. Violates WP:POLEMIC. The page creator has not contributed in more than a year and a half. -...

sandara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Clear violation of WP:POLEMIC; contains genocide denailist ("Uyghur genocide is false and the propaganda...

discussion. Peacock (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Delete as per WP:UP#POLEMIC. Non-admins aren't allowed to keep a record of perceived flaws forever...

title=Narciso_Yepes&diff=204258201&oldid=204090310 Which repeats the same polemic of user "Cant all be good" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...

history | links | watch | logs)​ This user page is full of violations of WP:POLEMIC. The user has been notified about this, and simply ignores the warning...

not what Wikipedia is for, WP:POLEMIC and WP:NPA applies. Skyshiftertalk 17:06, 20 June 2026 (UTC) delete per WP:POLEMIC --Lenticel (talk) 00:19, 21 June...

memoriae (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) All of these violate WP:POLEMIC. To quote from the linked page: ...statements attacking or vilifying groups...

encyclopedia. Achowat (talk) 04:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Delete - It's a polemic, apparently to create division. It is also wrong on some of the facts,...

links | watch | logs) Page is clearly an "enemies list" in violation of WP:POLEMIC The listing of multiple editors indicates that it is not an allowed collection...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nonsense article, a polemic of sorts, or an attempt at polemic. Its sources are blogs and an anti-Islam wiki. Quick,...

January 2023 (UTC) Weak keep: Not G10. Possibly this is NOTWEBHOSTING or POLEMIC. Possibly it is within reasonable leeway, if the user is making constructive...

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User page the may be violating Polemic. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Delete Normally a page...

on No Gun Ri Massacre (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Not really much more to say here. ― Padenton|✉   19:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)...

links | watch | logs) Seem to fall somewhere between promotional and WP:POLEMIC; it's clearly not of any benefit to Wikipedia (note that the user has tried...

how I view them (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:POLEMIC - specifically for this statement preceding the list: "users towards the...

Wikipedia isn't the place to voice it. I'm requesting deletion per WP:POLEMIC, as this template will only start arguments between users. Thank you. The...

User:CFCF/Verbage. The consensus here is that the page on its face is not polemic. If it is being misused in a manner to personally attack someone, that...

| watch | logs)​ Dead account overwhelmed with clear violations of WP:POLEMIC namely huge textwalls promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, misinformation...

WP:POLEMIC and WP:CIVIL. Defining which userboxes are polemic is largely left up to the community, and several more editors argued this was polemic than...

Delete: Violation of WP:BLP, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:UBCR. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: Polemic and inflammatory. Curbon7 (talk)...

User:Password Saeba Ryo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC Remover remover (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Speedy keep: This...

The key disagreement appears to be over different interpretations of WP:POLEMIC, which will likely remain unresolved at this time. Alex Shih (talk) 12:16...

(UTC) Delete - Sensible edge case that policy doesn't quite deal with. WP:POLEMIC may be most relevant. If it were a good faith user, and they kept it for...

2006 (UTC) This Userbox is polemic and should be deleted. Hong Qi Gong 00:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC) Keep How is this polemic? Pan-blue/pan-green politics...

noticeboard/Incidents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete per WP:UP#POLEMIC. It survived a previous MfD only on the basis that it was evidence being...

same reasons, in addition to the userspace content guidelines at WP:UP#POLEMIC and WP:Userboxes#Content restrictions (specifically point 2). SuperMarioMan...

talk | history | links | watch | logs) Offensive userbox that violates WP:POLEMIC (“Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable new polemic; not every book reviewed in National Review or Publishers Weekly is thereby...

watch | logs)​ This page violates WP:POLEMIC, points 2 and especially 3. Note that the only exceptions POLEMIC provides for are for timely (or the more...

pages in SR's user space in the "AC2020" sub-directory be deleted per WP:POLEMIC, which states that user pages cannot contain: Material that can be viewed...

includes ones that I've populated before, perhaps at the border of WP:POLEMIC. I've spoken to an admin who describes these actions as "passive aggressive...

sources (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete as per WP:POLEMIC, the page speaks disparagingly of editors that may support Donald Trump...

| history | links | watch | logs) Offensive userboxes that violate WP:POLEMIC (“Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”)...

ideologies are "evil" & advocates for their "elimination" violates WP:UBCR & WP:POLEMIC. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 17:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Keep I would...

does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. WP:BLP does not allow...

talk about it! 11:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Clear violation of WP:BLP, WP:UP#POLEMIC. The existence of this cannot be legitimated by any encyclopedic goal,...

talk about it! 01:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Clear violation of WP:BLP, WP:UP#POLEMIC. The existence of this cannot be legitimated by any encyclopedic goal,...

one as polemic. The frog can be dealt with separately. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Delete per Rhododendrites and WP:POLEMIC. VQuakr...

users to keep an eye on (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC - We don't keep lists of "bad users". Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:54, 6 November...

WP:Attack page applies to articles. The applicable guideline here is WP:POLEMIC which specifically makes exception for the collection of factual evidence...

for an undue period of time was better kept off wiki and violated WP:UP#POLEMIC. - Off2riorob (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC) User:Snowded/GoodNight (edit...

2007 (UTC) Template:Polemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This is a speedy deletion warning template for "polemic" userpages. There is...

The Romney Literary Society, established on January 30, 1819, as the Polemic Society of Romney, was the first literary society in what is now West Virginia...

Trooper/Userboxes/Ustase (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unused quite WP:POLEMIC userbox. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Clear violation of WP:POLEMIC (attacking or vilifying groups of editors, persons, or other entities)...

Justforivermectin was blocked, and now Testingitnow is restoring their talk-page polemic. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 21:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC) Accused parties...

some leeway for userspace drafts to be improved over time, but the WP:UP#POLEMIC aspect of this draft overrode that in this discussion. --RL0919 (talk)...

2016 (UTC) Keep I'm with SmokeyJoe- although the page is a polemic it's probably not a WP:POLEMIC. It certainly doesn't meet the description "Very divisive...

something like "subject of a heated polemic, known as the Querelle du Cid, over the norms of dramatic practice" "a heated polemic" – is the noun quite the right...

20:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC) Delete. Unused (only used in a directory) and WP:POLEMIC. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...

seems to indicate a WP:BATTLEGROUNDish mentality. Likely also violates WP:POLEMIC. The Bushranger One ping only 22:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC) Oppose Usesbox...

1of3/FallofChina2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Ophaned WP:POLEMIC userbox. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC) Delete as per nom...

—Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC) Delete - The text is a user polemic. The image is a BLP attack. Toss it out either way or both. Robert McClenon...

references to an opponent's wrongdoings. Doesn't seem legitimate per WP:UP#POLEMIC (seriously, didn't we have a shortcut like WP:SHITLIST or WP:DIRTYLAUNDRY...

User:Evilprincess30999/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy blanked sandbox junk...

removed from the WP:CSD page as premature) was that something really "polemic" would be disallowed on a user page whether or not it was in a template...

User:Sergow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Violates WP:POLEMIC. Editors have removed the page's content a number of times, but the user...

does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. Thebiguglyalien (talk)...

users and support for deletion on this basis. Thus this is a delete per WP:POLEMIC. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC) (Time stamp...

if this is supposed to be "funny" or something, but regardless it's WP:POLEMIC and needlessly hostile. We don't need this brand of pseudo-militaristic...

feelings, a call for a unifying language in the Dutch East Indies, and a polemic regarding the relation between tradition and modernity. A commercial and...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article is a polemic as it stands, and I'm not sure it can be cleaned up sufficiently to meet...

version of the Gospel of Matthew. The quotations were used as part of a polemic to point out inconsistencies in the beliefs and practices of the Ebionites...

Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Unused and unattended polemic in the userspace of an editor banned back in 2006. Serves no purpose, user...

as described in WP:UP#GOALS; also it has divisive comments as in WP:UP#POLEMIC. STSC (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Keep. I don't see a serious issue...

December 2007 (UTC) Delete The subject is not even a book. It's a shorti-ish polemic. Nshuks7 (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

April 2015 (UTC) Delete If users cannot record admin actions per WP:UP#POLEMIC, I don't see why admins should be allowed to either. See MfD of one of...

User:AmanPat501/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 22:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy blanked vandalism Legacypac...

know 07:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTANARCHY, and in some places WP:UP#POLEMIC. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 17:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC) The fact that...

delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 16:33, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) This page is overly polemic and poorly written and should probably go. Dlw22 15:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)...

a consensus that the page, as it currently stands, does not violate WP:POLEMIC. Guerillero | My Talk 22:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC) User:Porchcorpter/Problems...

probably WP:POV -- RoySmith (talk) 15:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. A polemic unrelated to Wikipedia, as a draft it completely fails WP:NPOV and WP:V...

(talk) 16:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Delete FAKEARTICLE that is also a polemic. Editor has no useful edits. Johnuniq (talk) 02:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC)...

depending on how you look at it) the Jews. As such, it violates WP:UP#POLEMIC. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 07:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC) Delete. Salamaat has been...

We do NOT accept copyright violations here. The material is also highly polemic and unrecoverably unencyclopedic. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:03, 18 February...

previous content is quite clearly a WP:POLEMIC violation. However, the current {{retired}} is fine. Is revdel the polemic history an option? If so, do that...

anything in this article is actually salvageable? The style is that of a polemic, not an encyclopedia article. There are no sources whatsoever. The article...

discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC) Highly polemic userbox that serves no purpose but to bash whatever politician is specified...

of it, therefore it's continued existence is a blatant violation of WP:POLEMIC. Said policy refers to such laundry lists in userspace as "Excessive unrelated...

(talk • contribs) 20:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Delete, oppose blanking WP:UP#POLEMIC states: Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking...

User:Flywithoutwingz/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy blank junk like this...

logs) Nazi userbox BMK (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Delete - per WP:POLEMIC. Achowat (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk)...

(UTC) User:Ticklerickle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Speedy blanked one edit account...

dbox/Vigilantism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:POLEMIC: this article has been created as a response to the user's grudges (see...

harassing me. The Banner talk 00:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Delete Obvious WP:POLEMIC violation. Johnuniq (talk) 01:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Keep My sense of...

inappropriate. Jclemens (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC) Violates WP:UP#POLEMIC. Jclemens (talk) 16:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC) Delete - there is nothing...

a soap box. Whpq (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC) It does read as a polemic or soapboxing. The font is offensive to my eye. However, AGF says this...

JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC) This userpage simply serves as a polemic - it's a collection of quotes supporting the user's view on the use of...

WP:POLEMIC. Di (they-them) (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC) Delete Prussian-German ethnicity has been linked to Insanity - and certainly WP:POLEMIC The...

Mormon church and homosexuality, and its exhibition in some states was polemic. Various religious groups demanded that the movie be withdrawn from theatres...

about the "This user will always hate Serbians" userbox, which violates WP:POLEMIC and should be deleted. I previously removed a similar userbox, but it has...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC) Delete: Per nom. Is a WP:POLEMIC draft, and not appropriate for the project. silviaASH (inquire within)...

suspicion smacks of WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:POLEMIC. MarnetteD|Talk 20:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC) Spersion? Polemic? The simple question, why a particular episode...

of reasoning, I believe that Hut 8.5 hits the nail on the head: WP:UP#POLEMIC is not violated, because this page is not in userspace, and neither is...

t/c 01:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC) The very title informs us that this is a polemic, not an encyclopedia article. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)...

spend their time editing it as well as Wikipedia policies. Delete per WP:POLEMIC Liz Read! Talk! 03:36, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Weak Keep, mainly because...

"Israel lobby in the United States" reads more like a muted political polemic than a detached, analytical definition of the term. It appears that the...

collection of diffs and stalker tool links without a clear objective. Per WP:UP#POLEMIC, that is not allowed pbp 18:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC) comment: the user...

26 March 2018 (UTC) Try to raise the bar please KJP1. Delete. Political polemic. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

MarioGom (talk) 22:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Delete as fake article and as polemic in user space. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Delete...

how to classify this odd stub, as an essay with original research or a polemic. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Ultramarine has jusat added in the text of a deleted article, a lengthy polemic in favor of the extreme view that two democracies have never ever fought...

| watch | logs) Is this really a useful userspace box? Seems pretty WP:POLEMIC to me. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Weak delete. Not...

man34/AfrikanerHomeland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC - advocates for racial segregation ~delta (talk • cont) 04:18, 5 October...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Polemic disguised as an article. No reference for the article title. --Tagishsimon...

| history | links | watch | logs) Offensive userboxes that violate WP:POLEMIC (“Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing”)...

a perfect example. Outright deletion isn't appropriate, since it's not polemic. Achowat (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Userfy as per User:Achowat. --...

04:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Keep. Doesn't seem so severe as to violate WP:POLEMIC, and it seems to have been transcluded enough that userfication doesn't...

02:00, 1 July, 2015 (UTC) Do not keep records of others' bitter posts. (WP:POLEMIC) Remember that maintaining civility doesn't always mean being pleasant...

history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC. Adam9007 (talk) 03:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC) Does not violate WP:POLEMIC. Is the intention to forbid userboxes...

others think. SuperMarioMan 07:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per nom,WP:UP#POLEMIC and WP:Userboxes#Content restrictions; verging WP:CSD#G10. JohnCD (talk)...

reversions. This is eerily similar to LondonIP, who has prepared a WP:POLEMIC user page (User:LondonIP/AE) which contains similar unfounded complaints...

It all depends on the context provided. The vague manner in which this polemic has been phrased, it is largely a play with semantics, and as such, valueless...

POV opinions on highly sensative subject in userspace, contrary to WP:UP#POLEMIC and WP:SOAPBOX. User has created similar pages before; see Wikipedia:Miscellany...

and cleanup. — CharlotteWebb 00:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Article is a polemic essay (WP:NOT#SOAP) and even if it were rewritten it would still be non-notable...

storm and fire: This isn't a factual article, it's a turgid, unsourced polemic that blows holes in WP:SOAPBOX, created by a now-indef blocked fellow....

by another user that Mcfnord disagrees with. They have been advised of POLEMIC, which prohibits such lists unless they are being compiled for use in a...

logs · filter log · block user · block log) is holding a grudge over. WP:POLEMIC is clear on this: "Users should generally not maintain in public view negative...

19 February 2011 (UTC) This user page is in direct violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC for what I hope are obvious reasons. A speedy delete raised by another...

history | links | watch | logs) Userspace pages in violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC dating from 8 May 2010‎. Pages belong to inactive user (last edited 20...

have essays like these. Even if this is userfied, it would fall under WP:POLEMIC concerns regarding what editors can and can not have for userpages. - Knowledgekid87...

userpage is unnecessary. BencherliteTalk 10:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC) WP:UP#POLEMIC Cptnono (talk) 09:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Ghostofnemo has created a user...

frowned upon as uncontributive to the encyclopedia, as a violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC. The list reappears on his talkpage. There was a discussion on AN/I [1]...

The page was blanked by its author and is now also deletable per WP:UP#POLEMIC. Page was also CSD-declined See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for...

hope nobody will find (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC, advocation against LGBT which has virtually nothing to do with Wikipedia...

sources (Tiktok + YouTube).[1][2] Their userpage might also violate WP:POLEMIC, particularly (in this case) the text "internet virgins keep banning and...

deletion criterion for it instead. —Keφr 18:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Delete WP:POLEMIC and unused userbox. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC) The...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Userbox is a violation of UP#Polemic Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for propaganda, advocacy, or recruitment...

refreshing given that most authors who cover it can't resist launching into a polemic on their views. The well-rounded portrait he provides of LeMay is also...

logs)Userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes. —...

User:DrFleischman/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UP#POLEMIC, this collection of diffs relating to Petrarchan47 should be deleted. Petrarchan47...

the views of secondary reliable sources. Partly a neologism, partly WP:POLEMIC, partly original research, and partly promotional. Robert McClenon (talk)...

Delete - As per SmokeyJoe, an essay containing original research. Also a polemic. Also, being resubmitted after being declined, and therefore a nuisance...

of thing. A2soup (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC) Delete, combined WP:POLEMIC unrelated to Wikipedia, WP:NOR, BLP violating which applies in any namespace...

User:Killergon2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:POLEMIC by calling 95% of Wikipedia editors "retarded faggots". Since parts are...

Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC, also see WP:NONAZIS. National Anarchism "advocates racial separatism,...

blocking, I see this as a clear-cut violation of WP:UPNOT, specifically WP:POLEMIC. This is not a substantive or useful essay; it is a personal screed from...

standard shit list" at ANI [1] Foul-mouthed enemies list, violates WP:UP#POLEMIC. User is indeffed, but this shouldn't stand anyway.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏...

amusing example of Arson, Murder, and Jaywalking, but it does violate WP:POLEMIC. Hatman31 (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

user identifies as a Belgian Nazi") will follow suit. It is certainly WP:POLEMIC ("unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking or vilifying groups of...

against recreation in different form. This page flies in the face of WP:POLEMIC and has been previously deleted via MFD along those lines. It has also...

2004 (UTC) Not disputing right to categorize, but the page itself is polemic. --Erauch 02:00, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC) Keep. NPOV only applies to articles....

negative interactions between this user and tarc (talk · contribs).WP:UP#POLEMIC Guerillero | My Talk 22:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC) actually a record of...

no need or excuse for such a "dirt file", which clearly violates WP:UP#POLEMIC. If there's a problem, natural recourse should be to WP:DR or WP:RFC/U...

Wikipedia editors. jps (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC and WP:UP#GOALS. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Appears...

for a userpage if a Wikiproject has not adopted it, and remains only a POLEMIC unconducive to collaborative transnational editing. Shrigley (talk) 20:58...

but polemic? Polemic: Polemic is the art or practice of disputation or controversy, as in religious, philosophical, or political matters. Polemic. Patstuarttalk|edits...

be deleted. Dianna (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:UP#POLEMIC, user pages should not include: "Material that can be viewed as attacking...

result of the discussion was Delete as contrary to the guidelines at WP:UP#POLEMIC. Extended explanation below. First, let me erase any doubts about my counting...

Apr 2005 (UTC) IfKeep, the Revise to NPOV. Otherwise it looks to me like polemic rather than history.--Simon Cursitor 07:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep -- Longhair...

and contributions histories as evidence. Until then, this fails WP:UP#POLEMIC, which specifically states that "Users should generally not maintain in...

(talk) 02:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC) Question - How do you fix or balance a polemic? Holding off !voting Delete until I get an answer. Robert McClenon (talk)...

page. The result of the discussion was: Delete I believe this violates WP:POLEMIC sufficiently enough to just remove it without waiting seven days for the...

space is very unprofessional. Per our WP:UP guidelines, we do not allow WP:POLEMIC material. Our user page is a place to talk about our Wikipedia activities...

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:UP#POLEMIC Exok (talk) 23:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC) Comment: No names are retained on...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. The first part is a polemic essay, the second part is dicdef quotations--if the term isn't in Wiktionary...

out correctly, the relevant guideline for handling this page is WP:UP#POLEMIC. While any guideline, unlike what some !voters seem to believe, does allow...

previous MFD and the deletion arguments that show a clear violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC show consensus for deletion of the material that discusses other named...

history | links | watch | logs) I think this user page qualifies under WP:POLEMIC. I don't think Wikipedia should maintain a diatribe from a user who is...

228 (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Sounds like standard rock-star polemic... Not sure if Phil was being genuinely supportive of his generation, or...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete - per WP:UP#POLEMIC, Attack page. - jc37 06:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC) See also...

political manifesto and document farm; severely fails WP:UP#GAMES, WP:UP#POLEMIC, and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Appears to be part of this user's multi-year campaign...

article, however well-researched it may be. Possibly some of the less polemic material could be incorporated in a general article on water safety. Mangoe...

page. The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. G10, inflammatory, polemic — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 16:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC) User:UBX/VRWC (edit...

matter. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Delete as a WP:POLEMIC, due to the title, and delete as purposeless forking of mainspace content...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a neutral encyclopedic article but an unreferenced polemic. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Created several times...

on whether or not the content of this userbox constitutes propaganda or polemic, or is otherwise inflammatory enough to justify deletion. —⁠ScottyWong⁠—...

abandoned. IMO, it has no hope of ever being a WP article since it's a polemic and may as well be deleted. Matt Deres (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)...

talk page access. A2soup (talk) 06:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Delete as polemic, and no need to keep such things particularly when they are unused. Scr★pIronIV...

Ever (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ WP:UBDIVISIVE WP:POLEMIC no intelligent discussion results from rhetoric like this; just distracting...

User:Gekritzl/Deletion gestapo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC by a now indef'ed account. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)...

an LTA listing. Regarding the request to userfy, the guideline at WP:UP#POLEMIC discourages keeping user pages to document misbehavior of other users unless...

of a political screed that's unnecessarily inflammatory and violates WP:POLEMIC. Furthermore, Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative project, and...

looks problematic. Lastly, some of the prose in the article is highly polemic, making a number of different accusations relating to persecution on the...

watch | logs) Offensive copy, since torture is illegal. Also fails WP:POLEMIC / WP:UP#PROMO. I'm also nomitating User:Toa Nidhiki05/Userboxes/Torture3...

Sophisticatedevening(talk) 19:35, 28 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Violates WP:POLEMIC. silviaASH (inquire within) 19:40, 28 July 2025 (UTC) DeletePer nom, as...

User:Ekips39/sandbox/2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:POLEMIC: "The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes...

trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ WP:UBDIVISIVE WP:POLEMIC no intelligent discussion results from rhetoric like this; just distracting...

the promotion of violent acts ("poetic militancy") on user pages as a polemic. RfA reform, again: Started by Biblioworm "to move past the disorderly...

If it's a banned user, isn't WP:G5 appropriate? Otherwise you have WP:POLEMIC and it's arguable (but I wouldn't support it necessarily) under WP:U5....

user page as a blog to denigrate others is highly inappropriate. WP:UP#POLEMIC prohibits "statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors or persons"...

civility guideline we have just on the first line; the remainder is just a polemic. Nothing here concerns writing an encyclopedia. -- Gavia immer (talk) 14:20...

editied it. Off2riorob (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:UP#POLEMIC: Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information...

pre-Julian intercalation but refuses to explain why. His edits are frequently polemic and argumentative, not NPOV, and on some occasions he has attacked me in...

Mo0[talk] 03:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC) This isn't an article but an essay, a polemic arguing a particular POV about a data protocol. It's way out on neutrality...

Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR and WP:POLEMIC, also see WP:NONAZIS. National Anarchism "advocates racial separatism,...

(UTC) User:Alexia Death (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ WP:POLEMIC, WP:DENY, and WP:SOAP; see history. Firestar464 (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2021...

| logs) This is a blatant attack page and one of the worse cases of WP:POLEMIC logging a laundry list of years old disputes claiming that the editors...

Therefore, this may not need to be merged, because it's not OR, but it's a polemic. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

violations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This is a WP:POLEMIC list and is amplified by this page: User:Coffee/NOBAN violations is tantamount...

then it doesn't exist, as far as I'm concerned. And the article is more polemic than encyclopedic anyway. Drmies (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC) turn...

living language. The LanguageLog blog used to have some rather entertaining polemic articles about this issue; I might find some links for you later. Fut.Perf...

page contains polemic materials and hence should be deleted. نان (talk) 13:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Keep Page doesn't fall under WP:POLEMIC as it doesn't...

Cohen and Norman Stillman, published in Tikkun magazine in 1991 over the polemic nature of the existing literature on Middle Eastern Jewry. We will then...

November 2012 (UTC) Comment Perhaps unrelated(?), Martin Cohen wrote a polemic about Wikipedia in the Times Higher Education on August 28, 2008.[1] One...

"Wikisex"). Other users can as well--if the author wants to go on an anti-Wik polemic at his user page, he's welcome. That doesn't mean this belongs in the Wikipedia...

a consensus systems, many discussions about article content end up as polemic disputes, with editors locked in endless arguments over minor (even trivial)...

WP:LTA. The debate revolved around the definition of “timely manner” in WP:POLEMIC and whether a period of 2 months failed that criteria. However, no firm...

| links | watch | logs) This page is a rather clear violation of WP:UP#POLEMIC by a now long-since-banned user. The WP:BATTLEGROUND language and tone...

This article is now a redirect. To see the reasons for deletion, (vile polemic rant) go back to the history. Oh, and Delete. DJ Clayworth 14:17, 19 Aug...

establish musical notability or general notability. It is also largely a polemic and is non-neutral, and cannot really be made non-neutral. Robert McClenon...

have laundry lists of perceived wrongs hanging around in userspace per WP:POLEMIC. Therefore, I have moved the page without a redirect to...

Userspace. However, a simple statement of hatred is not acceptable. Per WP:POLEMIC "Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking or...

leeway normally extended to editors, and runs afoul of WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:POLEMIC, WP:BLP, WP:SMI and a number of other policies and guidelines, and should...

December 2011 (UTC) Delete as the contents near the bottom violate WP:UP#POLEMIC and mildly WP:NOTSOAPBOX. HurricaneFan25 18:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Delete...

created articles, not including the userboxes, see UPNOT and, particularly, POLEMIC. Remember this isn't Facebook or a discussion group, we're here to build...

essay space, and I wouldn't support userfication either because it is a WP:POLEMIC. Reyk YO! 13:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC) Weak Delete or Userfy - Wild, cynical...

of these is clearly an attack page against an editor and so fails WP:UP#POLEMIC. While there will be disagreements between editors, and it will occasionally...

June 2017 (UTC) Delete -- a non-encyclopedic concoction; reads like a polemic of unknown purpose. Delete per WP:TNT. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:02, 2 July...

13:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Keep per Robert McClenon, a well-sourced, non-polemic draft should never be deleted at MfD. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 19:47, 10...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Pretty sure this violates WP:POLEMIC as "divisive or offensive content", in this case attacking language variance...

logs) Userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes. —...

deleted under U5 as it seems like a personal view/essay (e.g NOTAWEBHOST or POLEMIC territory). However, sitting in Draft space, being newly created and actively...

Unused userbox promoting fascist ideologies, which violates WP:UBCR, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:NONAZIS. See other previous discussions about such userboxes. —...

articles in that subject category utilize any resources beyond those found in polemic literature of the religion. Regards, A35821361 (talk) Makes sense to delete...

anarchy is the same as opposing capitalism, socialism or communism. Not polemic. SK2242 (talk) 16:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep: This is one's own...

Wikipedia:Userboxes/Politics/Ideologies should be handled as a whole or not at all. WP:POLEMIC (which many will probably cite), though the first bullet point is too vague...

WP:POLEMIC problems. Let's start with number 6 (I also don't want to call these "theses" since that feels pretentious for just a wall of text). POLEMIC defines...

10:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Delete "Are you ******* kidding me?" WP:UP#POLEMIC is an actual policy against this. I've had G10s tagged and deleted that...

below this notice. Thanks, ZabMilenko 10:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Delete. Polemic Neologism. --Pgallert (talk) 11:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC) Delete. No content...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Appears to violate WP:POLEMIC which indicates that userpages should not contain"Material that can be...

Moreschi Deletion! 15:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Delete as OR religious polemic. Edison 16:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Delete this is a classical POV fork...

real world. Greg L (talk) 01:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Delete. per WP:UP#POLEMIC. Actually, I'm slightly tempted to keep this as a record of B2C's modus...

attacking or vilifying groups of editors, persons, or other entities" (WP:UP#POLEMIC). Hut 8.5 19:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Delete it’s is uncivil, plus there...

Delete:Unnecessarily (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:BLP, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:UBCR. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete:...

13:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC) Delete as a breach of WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:POLEMIC, as well as being obviously neo-Confederate in its tone, and therefore...

(UTC) Delete per nomination. The only notable aspect of that text is the polemic tone (e.g. "Because of high profile relatives and a strong background people...

ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 14:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC) Delete WP:POLEMIC, WP:NONAZIS], etc. Extremist advocacy has no place on Wikipedia. ~delta...

computer. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC. A Fellow Editor is welcome to use the page for a brief time to develop...

October 2010 (UTC) Do we really need this type of profanity in an already polemic userbox? Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 10:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Keep...

user page contains material not related to Wikipedia's goals. It is a WP:POLEMIC page about a topic deemed to be contentious. Editors are reminded that...

(talk) 12:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Delete - Not an encyclopedic topic. Polemic essay. Carrite (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Delete - An encyclopedia...

feelings, a call for a unified language in the Dutch East Indies, and a polemic regarding the relation between tradition and modernity. Siti Akbari was...

obvious assertion that the editor is anti-Semitic so the page fails WP:POLEMIC. I have explained here (permalink) that any evidence an editor is commenting...

the top of Talk:Indigo children. The essay itself, however, is more of a polemic against a belief than a useful editing tool. Userfication allows the opinion...

| links | watch | logs) Not a permitted use of a user page, per WP:UP#POLEMIC; and see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive278#Is this an attack...

User:EchoUSA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Obvious violations of WP:POLEMIC and WP:PROMO, removed by me, and restored by EchoUSA. Beyond My Ken (talk)...

give leeway for user expression, but this is really close to a pointless polemic. MSJapan (talk) 04:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC) keep, wrong venue. Userboxes...

not know how I came across this userbox, but I think it's just plain WP:POLEMIC and potentially sexist or transphobic. #prodraxis connect 22:16, 29 November...

such as Muammar Gaddafi took up the call in the 1970s and 1980s, with polemic inspiring those who had endured suffering to incorporate the compass into...

Marek/Evidence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Delete per WP:POLEMIC; old stuff from an old case. Drmies (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)...

when it comes to breaching WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:UPNOT and WP:POLEMIC. The user in question, obviously, grossly misunderstood what a userpage...

2009 (UTC) Delete Agree with Gavia that this subject is in and of itself polemic, not encyclopedic. Also agree with Plvekamp that there are enough Wiki...

To avoid anyone jumping to the conclusion that this is a nationalist polemic for Irish unity, please observe that it would apply equally well to a reunited...

the polemic bit, but that is a valid reason to delete. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Yes, my delete is based on the polemic bit....

watch | logs) This page is in violation of three userspace policies: WP:POLEMIC (particularly the prohibition against "statements attacking or vilifying...

why the polemics exist; noted polemics; factual evidence against common polemic arguments. These are encyclopedic content, though not included. Deprecating...

attempt at a retaliatory personal smear. Dubyus is engaged in personal polemic against someone he percieves as an enemy. See comments on Woods Coffee...

controversial writer who has been critisized often for being more of a polemic than a scholar (see talk page on Dhimmi). There is very little, if any...

anti-LGBTQ views on Wikipedia is inflammatory and divisive, violating WP:UPNOT#POLEMIC and WP:NQP, is not in any way meaningfully related to building the encyclopedia...

evoke strong reactions." Then that would mean it probably violates WP:POLEMIC, right? ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 17:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Comment...

ANI, who has been edit warring on his own user page via a violation of POLEMIC, ended up getting his user page full protected, and is under threat of...

endorsement of Antifa, but an endorsement of political violence. Per WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR, this is not really conductive for building an encyclopedia...

is better than a "Keep". --Richard 08:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. A polemic, not an encyclopedia article. TCC (talk) (contribs) 09:01, 3 March 2007...

(UTC) User:Janagewen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC) Delete - User pages are...

kept on wiki. — Ched :  ?  20:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:UP#POLEMIC Achowat (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Keep for now. Although we don't...

several reasons (Soapboxing, any of the G# or U# criteria, excessively polemic). Userspace pages are not immune to deletion. —Jeremy (v^_^v Carl Johnson)...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violates WP:POLEMIC. In particular, it is "offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing"...

psychic lives. "Economic totalitarianism", as used by Friedman, is simply a polemic word to argue against planned economy and the Soviet Union (which is fair...

not fair. It is polemic.Issajewitsch (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC). Sorry, I didn't intend to be polemic. However, that...

--SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Keep - This isn't divisive or polemic. And we generally allow humour and community-building pages. - jc37 10:33...

undue weight on a single minor incident, peppered with poor sources and polemic attacks. Article was merged and redirected 6 months ago by User:Thargor...

- A weird sort of polemic unrelated to Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Not weird at all. Not polemic. There is plenty of...

clearcut violation of WP:UP#NOT as a polemic. JGHowes talk - 21:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC) It's certainly not polemic because the BSA's homophobic policy...

MfD nomination on BLP, but on WP:NOTSOAP, WP:NOTBLOG, and WP:UP#POLEMIC. WP:UP#POLEMIC prohibits: Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia...

does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. Thebiguglyalien (talk)...

of dispute resolution process, provided they do so promptly (see WP:UP#POLEMIC). The material was only added today. If this isn't used as part of an RFC...

WP:POLEMIC. It is too far-left compared to Wikipedia's goals. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 15:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Keep. The userbox is not WP:POLEMIC anymore...

something that ought to be approached with delicacy on Wikipedia, not uncited polemic. All one must do is swap out "white people" and "non-whites" for the races...

IP is unable to create the MfD page. The reason given is: "Wikipedia:UP#POLEMIC and WP:SOAP". JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC) What has changed...

September 2025 (UTC) If the opening lines of the Unabomber Manifesto isn't WP:POLEMIC, then idk what is. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 09:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC)...

raised on the talk page. --AmritasyaPutraT 05:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC) WP:POLEMIC says: "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including...

establish some notability for Myanmar military personal (see [1]). It has polemic news mentions but fails clearly WP:GNG. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:42...

Winslow/Xenophrenic (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) Per WP:UP#POLEMIC, user pages that are for the "recording of perceived flaws" should not...

Flipping into "starvation mode". Etymology "Spreading branches" Why the polemic between Bible / evolution? Thermal question - longevity comparison of ice...

allegations against not just one but multiple living persons. Badly written polemic (that's a fancy word for soapboxing, something that Wikipedia isn't for)...

Wikipedia isn't the place to voice it. I'm requesting deletion per WP:POLEMIC, as this template will only start arguments between users. Thank you. The...

accurate article with copyediting problems than a badly written and erroneous polemic with perfect dashes and italicization. Copyediting the well-written and...

wanting to put up a link to their own eloquent and magnificent anti-Bush polemic. (see #R) tomasz. 13:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia is not a lyrics...

| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Violation of WP:UP#NOT: WP:UP#POLEMIC. Oneiros (talk) 07:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC) I am the author. I would like...

references from two New Conference publications this last year, they're polemic but facts can be gleaned from them. I agree with Anselm, this article helps...

opposes Dixie Genocide (1861-1877) denial". Jesus Christ, can they say WP:POLEMIC any louder. Curbon7 (talk) 11:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC) Delete under...

editor. I don't see why it should be userfied because it would then fail WP:POLEMIC which applies even for indeffed/banned users—if there were a reason to...

editors that the creator of this page did not like. This is unnecessary, polemic, and encourages a battleground mentality. SnottyWong spout 22:55, 27 September...

page User:Diafygi and this userbox should probably be deleted under WP:UP#POLEMIC. Diafygi should be given an opportunity to take this material offline in...

Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC) The current article is a polemic against Homeopathy: it s not neutral. 1.” Claims for its efficacy beyond...

punishment is well within the Overton Window at Wikipedia and is not subject to POLEMIC. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Overton...

secretary for strategy at the Australian Department of Defence. This book is a polemic on Australian defence strategy. Most of what White has to say is fairly...

page, and is backing away from the spurious claim and is now saying it's polemic, which I address below. Cheers. ~ UBeR 02:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC) Agreed...

scientific thoughts, his high capacity as a teacher and his enthusiasm for polemic matters on the frontier of science, influenced many generations of his...

are not adults" to be really in very poor taste. This is not an abortion polemic. [email protected] (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Well, sorry if...

No pass on WP:NAUTHOR either; there's a published response to Smith's polemic on Quakerism but nothing else verifiable. (The Bockett letter does not...

Maintaining notes posing questions about another editor is a violation of WP:POLEMIC. A dispute regarding an article should be examined at the article's talk...

8 May 2016 (UTC) If it contains a hit list, it will be deleted per WP:POLEMIC. Johnuniq (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC) Most edits from this point on...

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:BLP, WP:POLEMIC, and WP:UBCR. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete:...

much better than this version, as it was not devoted to an anti-Islam polemic nor did it include strands of antisemitism. (If for some reason this article...

Dronebogus (talk) 12:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR. Permitting pseudoscience brings the project into disrepute...

KillerChihuahua?!? 17:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC) A fellow has a right to juicy polemic or two in his userspace. Let him userfy it. That wouldn't raise any hostility...

for deleting userboxes that endorse fascism in the two MfDs I linked. WP:POLEMIC says that "statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors, persons...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Although https://lesmaterialistes.com/english/maoism-polemic-launched-pce-cr-part mentions it that is not enough to show notability...

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: Violation of WP:POLEMIC and WP:UBCR. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC) Keep:...

one review, as basically the lone source (saying the book is tendentious polemic), but that is not enough to pass muster per WP:NBOOK, which, in its most...

--Rlin8 (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:POLEMIC. It isn't entirely clear what the author is ranting about, let alone why...

Speedy delete as G10 if applicable, if not delete as clear, blatant WP:POLEMIC and possible WP:GS/RUSUKR issues. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk |...

If this is not filed in a timely manner it can be renominated per WP:POLEMIC. Given the level of support for keeping the page at this time it seems...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This article is essentially a polemic with blatant disregard for NPOV. It has only two sources; the rest is unverified...

involved in one ANI case which was promptly resolved over the presence of polemic on my userpage; at the time I was unaware that there were any guidelines...

Truth/Userboxes/Soc Darwin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Per WP:POLEMIC and WP:NONAZIS. JJPMaster (she/they) 02:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC) Keep...

| subject | history | links | watch | logs) This material: violates WP:POLEMIC: Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking or...

can't honestly say it's not a notable subject. What this IS, however, is a polemic essay that's heavily involved in WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH violations and choked...

with the statement "Saved for posterity and pride:" I removed this as WP:POLEMIC saying take me to ANI if you like. The editor responded with this post...

article didn't fit the reviewer's particular point of view (it wasn't polemic enough). That said, my personal experience with the GA review process has...

both sides in almost equal measures. For the Deletes, the issues are WP:POLEMIC, WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA, WP:UP#NOT and WP:NOTSOAPBOX, and that ultimately one...

26 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete: It's not telling the truth! (POV, advocacy, polemic, not notable, borrowed fame.) Geogre 21:37, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC) Delete please...

support him...? The extensive political commentary falls afoul of WP:UP#POLEMIC, which prohibits: "Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements...

08:52, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Delete - There is definetly a policy about polemic statements here. That has to go. Naluboutes, NaluboutesAeria gloris, Aeria...

article has been around for years and has fluctuated between being a stub, a polemic against him, or an advertisement for him, but has never become anything...

itself remains. Cnilep (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:UP#POLEMIC. Tarc (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC) Keep Ironically, I recently read a...

without graphics. Kges1901 (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Delete as polemic and inflammatory. Mostly concur with User:Catfurball. Paging User:Jimfbleak...

off-topic for a userbox for a collaborative encyclopedia. See also: WP:POLEMIC Cremastra (u — c) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC) Keep Users are given wide...

madness. --Doncram (talk) 11:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC) That was quite a polemic, but I don't see your point. There is no significant independent coverage...

negative information on others, unless taken promptly to ArbCom". from WP:POLEMIC: "Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information...

(talk) 16:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC) Delete - Useless "essay". Two parts polemic against perceived enemies, one part gushing hagiography about a disruptive...

attacks on another country's sovereignty are disruptive and violate WP:POLEMIC. Wikipedia is not the place for aggressive political posturing, as made...

"Allegations of bias" section is for the most part a factual catalog rather than polemic, and if it appears POV to some this may be because Fox News defenders haven't...

the main article. If you google decompression curve you will find one polemic by George Irvine, and several copies of the disputed Wikipedia article...

opportunity to do so :) In fact, that article is supposed to be a part of a polemic with academics. Would any of you be interested in reading and possibly...

was Keep —GFOLEY FOUR— 04:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC) attack page per WP:UP#POLEMIC is not allowed Mbz1 (talk) 19:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Comment This page...

important and encyclopedic topic, but the article is obviously undergoing a polemic edit war. Those who have studied comparative religion should take a look...

User:Password Saeba Ryo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:POLEMIC Remover remover (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC) This user mentioned...

other reasonable and short term dispute handling.[1] According to WP:UP#POLEMIC, user pages should not host: Material that can be viewed as attacking other...

control Totalitarian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) See WP:POLEMIC. "Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking...

restoration of the CSA? If there are divisive opinions that clearly violate WP:POLEMIC then just remove them. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)...

declared retired user and editor not of good standing, according to WP:UP#POLEMIC and WP:NOT#SOAP. -- KC9TV 20:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Oppose per WP:UP#DELETE...

not appear to have been used in a "timely manor" as described in WP:UP#POLEMIC The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes...

and realizing, he's also talking about you. Keen opens his anti-Web 2.0 polemic (and he admits in the afterword that is exactly what he was aiming for)...

neologism that didn't catch on. The article is furthermore written as a polemic, and in a style inappropriate and out of place in a general encyclopedia...

"negative information related to others without very good reason", cf WP:UP#POLEMIC, and should be deleted. Is there a history of antagonism between these...

05:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Keep. It's a real topic, tho its written a polemic essay and needs improvement. For example, the illustration include at least...

a good job). In the English polemic history of the Arab-Israeli conflict (though interestingly not in the Hebrew polemic history), this "quotation" must...

User:Amanak007/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Per WP:POLEMIC... The draft makes several claims in wikivoice, such as [Trans women] are...

balancing. The article here is essentially an ESSAY/book-report of a few very polemic sources on the matter. There are also quite far out claims - e.g. However...

goes for WP:UP#POLEMIC Chaos5023 goes for WP:UP#POLEMIC Jack Merridew goes for WP:UP#POLEMIC Reyk goes for a trifecta: WP:UP#POLEMIC, WP:CIVIL and WP:DICK...

Bakr, or Shia Islam. Striver's intent to create the page as an anti-Sunni polemic doesn't preclude its being transformed into a good article; remember the...

they do not allow gay members and leaders." to be considered equally as polemic. If such a userbox existed, I would be listing that for deletion just as...

divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing (WP:POLEMIC). It's related to encyclopedia editing (albeit for talk pages) and I'd...

highly negative, and likely to get worse. In the end, it will look like a polemic. Nip it in the budding stage. Objective3000 (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2017...

User:Discasto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:AGF, WP:POLEMIC. We should not have as a standing user page an open accusation of bad faith...

be applied until objective criteria can be established for divisive and polemic. It is one thing to say you support something. It is quite another saying...

delete Pagrashtak 02:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC) I would have speedied it as polemic/divisive/inflammatory, with ugly colors to boot, but the information appears...

huge "Trump: Make America Great Again!" banner is a violation of both WP:POLEMIC and WP:UP#Promo and should be removed - after all, we are not a social...

monopolized by the upper-castes...". That is not encyclopaedic writing - that is polemic. (I do rather enjoy the idea of Marxism being the property of the upper...

userpage. While I've supported deleting several userboxes when they were too polemic or discriminatory, I have trouble seeing this as similarly problematic...

page, [edit] generally failing WP:AGF / WP:DBAD clearly violating WP:UPNO#POLEMIC. He has been invited [1] [2] to reform his user page but has ignored these...

WP:UP#POLEMIC? Jclemens (talk) 04:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC) I disagree with you, but I will let the community decide whether my userbox is polemic. SnottyWong...

page source or documentation). Please don't make the text anything too polemic or critical of others. Note that "fair use" images (in particular, the...

(talk) 12:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Delete the Sub page and talk page per WP:POLEMIC rather than WP:UP#PROMO, also per WP:OR. My rationale is the same as the...

reasons quite clearly in the nomination. If you'd like to see a policy WP:UP#POLEMIC will do quite nicely. Your right of course, I should have mentioned that...

29 August 2006 (UTC) Unsourced, unargumented useless non-neutral and polemic point of view based article. This article is amateurish and all but encyclopaedic...

January 30, 1819 to 1886, in Romney, West Virginia. Established as the Polemic Society of Romney, it became the first organization of its kind in West...

reason to do so. For example, I fixed one footnote which repeated one polemic in Wikipedia's voice. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:11, 24 January 2007...

through (seeing as I can actually read chinese). The material violates WP:POLEMIC as the vast majority of it is a rant at puppetry, not the sock or meat...

topics. TheAE talk/sign 18:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Agreed delete, one is a polemic the other is a subject. Esurnir (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC) delete...

--Striver 12:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC) I'm not saying all anti-Islam polemic sites are not extremist. I'm sure you can find an example of one that is...

was the right decision. WMC may have some valid points in their argument/polemic, but in the end, the common good of our global community shall prevail...

article isn't even about the alleged photographer, only an incoherent polemic. This article fails any serious evaluation of its worth. Pinkville 11:45...

happy. That is polemic and offensive to a lot of people. I2Overcome talk 22:41, 20 March 2025 (UTC) Delete: probably counts under WP:POLEMIC. Keep: There's...

project-related user’s opinion in their userspace has very large leeway. It is not POLEMIC. It does not name individuals (not that I saw). Censoring opinion in userspace...

Doesn't belong here either under whatever combination of WP:NOTHERE/WP:POLEMIC/WP:NOTWEBHOST/WP:PROXYING tickles your fancy. The foundations resources...

Vegetarianism. If someone wants to try merging, that's fine, but it's all uncited polemic and probably not worth the effort. We could probably use a more detailed...

talk:RHaworth/Editnotice (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) This polemic rant is incompatible with the conduct expected of administrators, particularly...

a highly detailed account of Cuban history, U.S.– Cuba relations and a polemic against the United States embargo on commerce with Cuba." It's just a listing...

a block, but to ensure that there is transparency in this particularly polemic article. I agree with Ronk01 that he is trying to ensure Anibal06 is not...

as a notable "Vandals Who Vandalize Repeateddly". That violates WP:UP#POLEMIC, and the user page seems to be set up to receive additional posts that...

2006 (UTC) Comment See now, this is exactly the sort of situation where polemic userboxes would come in handy. We could just go look for the users with...

then let them.--Lucy-marie 23:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Speedy Userfy polemic userbox that should not be in template space. Eluchil404 23:47, 22 January...

and pov expressed in the delete argument we need to be very clear that polemic or partisan sources wouldn’t be a suitable fit for a neutral article but...

"Userboxes must not be inflammatory or substantially divisive" and WP:POLEMIC. being "against neurodiversity" is clearly inflammatory and hurtful to...

spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Polemic-nerd (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...

do not support that any of its allegations are true. The article is a polemic against the anti metric movement which is attacked at least three times...

Medical Scientism - pure polemic from Mr Natural Health. A respectable article about the Scientific method in medicine could of course be written, but...

an WP:NPOV way. But I don't see that happening. As it stands now it's polemic. Wikipedia is not a soapbox Delete Lar 02:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC) "Examples...

| logs) This article was created as an attack page,[1] violates WP:UP#POLEMIC, and has no legitimate purpose in building the encyclopedia.   Will Beback ...

Wikipedia:Notability (films). Again, sorry if I'm coming across as overly polemic but IMDB ≠ Notability. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)...

have something which is basically an anti-Hungarian-nationalist rant, polemicizing against the previously deleted article. I am sure an article could be...

anything that violates wp:npa, this does I would argue. As well as WP:POLEMIC.Slatersteven (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC) From that, all I can...

arguments. ——SerialNumber54129 17:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC "Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia editing"...

arguments to find the consensus. Much of the keep arguments are assertive or polemic what is policy based has been well challenged. The preponderance of the...

anything on Breton nationalism from French Wikipedia, as there's been a hugh polemic about it there. Thirdly, it is completely unsourced. Fourthly, (minor point)...

(WP:FREE although an essay is also relevant) and also meets WP:FRINGE, WP:POLEMIC, WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:POVFORK (my beliefs are true and WP is wrong so are...

certain facets of WP:UPNOT. There are statements within which are per se polemic and divisive. I quote: "Muslims say "Islam" means submission to God. But...

excessive by any means.Falcon8765 (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC) Delete polemic userbox that violates WP:UBX which states that userboxes are not for political...

generic polemic statements, these pages are busy and we don't have time for that sort of foolishness. But while we are making generic polemic statements...

far smaller scope, which although have broad articles here on wiki. As polemic as this argument might sound, but if you really consider to delete the...

disabilities who actually do need mental health care. Either way, too WP:POLEMIC for a userbox. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 03:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC) Delete...

T / C） 16:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) I warned To my distress for making polemic and personal attack statement on his user page, which mirrors what was...

not be imminently used, and the same once no longer needed." from WP:UP#POLEMIC. If I'd known they were there earlier, I'd have asked him to delete them...

Indef the user too, I think that is what he needs if he's posting only a polemic randt on the userpage. ~Crazytales (Hasta la Pasta!) 19:25, 26 March 2007...

sources to write a biography, and the very existence of the article (and the polemic around it) used as a promotional vehicle. Given that there isn't even verifiable...

12 December 2012 (UTC) Comment - The page appears to fall under WP:UP#POLEMIC - a public view of negative information related to others. The page was...

2006 where they say that all polemic userboxes llike the ones saying "This user supports Hamas" should be deletedm, "Polemic boxes - these are the actual...

per Wikipedia:User_page#What_may_I_not_have_on_my_user_page.3F, it is a polemic statement unrelated to wikipedia. Being pro-something is fine, being anti-something...

trolling. 76.107.171.90 (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC) delete as per WP:POLEMIC it does not appear to be supporting Wikipedia's growth and aspirations...

page should still be deleted; the user could simply revert the blanking. Polemic statements are not allowed in userspace per WP:USER, and the page was nothing...

division and cause offence amongst editors with different views. WP:UP#POLEMIC forbids Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking...

multiple complaints that the list violated POLEMIC. The accumulation has continued even after several POLEMIC warnings. It's clear Noteduck has decided...

Users (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​ Falling under WP:POLEMIC as a page dedicated to "vilifying groups of ... persons". While it was...

courtesy ping to them. Whether this is a hoax, a crystal ball, or it's polemic (again, I'm not sure what to make of that last section), I don't think...

why it was going to have "Polemic" in the title? The available sources do not mention the intention behind adding "Polemic" to the title, but I would...

reasoned critiques, in general usage the terms more often occur in political polemic". No matter what "source" you put before that, it still does not read neutrally...

2011 (UTC) Apology of al-Kindy (book) says it's "a medieval theological polemic tract attributed to an Arab Christian known as Al Kindi". However, Abd...

hole and declared a perfect fit. My biggest beef: "Front groups" is a polemic, pejorative term popularized in the USA during the McCarthy era about the...

to push his own will against majority of the community, just verify the polemic Muhammad Cartoons Controversity RapaNui 02:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Neutral...

"Why my pet fringe theory is right and all of academia is wrong". It's a polemic that masquerades as an encyclopedia article. Fascism already covers this...

artistic or research purposes" and "content which represents an expression of polemic or controversial views in the course of public debate." Still, it criticizes...

in order to express themselves, and I don't think that this violates WP:POLEMIC, so I think the WP:PAG guide towards keeping this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest)...

abstract is in English).[1] It refers to this as notable as the first polemic written by an Albanian about an Albanian subject. I don't think it is well...

obvious to me where it should go. The small footprint on Google, mainly polemic, self-published material and passing mentions, does not encourage me to...

writing articles in newspapers, magazines and internet, which are considered polemic, funny and bizarre, to say the least. An encyclopaedic article on de Carvalho...

by itself. Number 57 15:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Delete - reads like a polemic, is full of unsourced assertions, and blatantly tries to make a political...

rather baldfacedly criticize Coretheapple, in open, knowing violation of WP:POLEMIC (you've done this trash before, and I referred you to it), is also pointless...

deserve an article of its own. We don't aim to write articles about every polemic book. Zerotalk 13:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC) Delete A mention in the bio...

statements." However, there is a difference between "inflammatory" and "polemic." Polemic's Greek root means essentially "belligerent," but nowadays means argumentative...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is nothing more than a POV polemic that adds nothing to the already existing and more encylopedic Dolphin...

article just mentions it as a launchpad into nationalist and Islamist polemic), routine and trivial results announcements (12). Iran Press: routine and...

userspace that can not ever have any value to Wikipedia? WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:POLEMIC seem to both apply here. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Delete...

| history | links | watch | logs)​ his page is merely a thinly veiled polemic page, used to attack and ridicule those that Coffman has determined to...

prove useful down the road (RfAs and the like). A sort of accidental WP:POLEMIC. ;) Leaky Caldron 22:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Keep but move to Wikipedia:April...

rush would disrupt his pastoral interests? ...that Richard Polwhele's polemic poem The Unsex'd Females deplored the female pastime of amateur botany...

2023 (UTC) Delete If this were in user space I would delete it as a WP:POLEMIC violation. Dressing it up as a potential article makes the bureaucracy...

logs)​ The "Funny" section of this user page is in blatant violation of WP:POLEMIC, as it contains "Very divisive or offensive material not related to encyclopedia...

capacity. Aprox 40 sandbox entries to a grievances list in violation of POLEMIC [[2]]. After a repeated requests they blanked the list with an questionable...

kind words! I'll keep on being bold (and hopefully not causing this much polemic next time) ;) Amedyr 11:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC) Delete CPAScott 19:52, 16...

held after the nomination), so obviously not an attack page. Also not polemic enough per NOTADVOCACY or UBCR to cause major disruption. Politrukki (talk)...

sources. Yworo (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC) P. R. Koenig's site is a polemic anti-OTO site. This means it cannot be trusted as a reliable source. Since...

inclusion. The other sites you've mentioned here are forum threads and minor polemic websites, none of which are notable in themselves or have anything to do...

"useful to the project", as the guideline says. Nor is the material a polemic. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2025 (UTC) Keep Let's...

(talk) 01:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC) Delete I suppose. It feels a bit polemic. Lightburst (talk) Delete: By my count, I've found literally only two edits...

WP:SOAP because this is not a statement of advocacy. Does not vio0late WP:POLEMIC either, because it is in no way polemical, and does not make any negative...

Featured Article Find out reason behind error A board for discussing "polemic materials" Silent ping Question about free internet content speeches On...

2603:7000:CF0:7280:58B:3BD4:1DAB:AEB4 (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC, WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS. We do not need bigotry in userspace, period...

David Marples describes Poliszczuk's as detailed although taking the form polemic, similiar in one-sideness of views regarding UPA to the Soviet perspective...

and wrote a book on fundamentalism. But even there Packer was writing a polemic to a broader audience than the Reformed world; he was not arguing for "Reformed...

is independently notable because Orwell's use of subtle detail in his polemic works was always carefully thought out and he's full of allegory to '30s...

currently even mention Macaulay's name. The current content seems too polemic and so need not be retained. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:49, 15 March 2011...

Explosion: Woman Weapon of Mass Destruction #1, which appears to be a polemic against abortion and not a reliable source of any kind, let alone Indian...

speedily (and appropriately) deleted and this should be no different. WP:UP#POLEMIC, Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia and WP:UP#GOALS, Writings...

particular as opposed to other figures, and 2) that's not really being polemic, that's just being a biologist, as essentially 100% of reputable biologists...

does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. Gender critical and biological...

area. The talk page will never be used in an article and borders on WP:UP#POLEMIC. Since this material will never be used on this project and is controversial...

25 January 2010 (UTC) Astley Cross VERY short stub, but subject to much polemic - see archived discussion. Droitwich Archery Society  Done Evesham Arts...

insight as to why it was blanked, it contained stuff in violation of WP:POLEMIC, i.e. recording of supposed misdeeds by pother users, and restoring it...

wikipedia notability standards, and that's enough to end this fruitless polemic. Any further demand beyond the notability standards, like that the article...

Whether or not this is appropriate depends on the purpose of the page. WP:POLEMIC prohibits editors from keeping lists of negative information about other...

comments because I'm a "blind supporter", the userbox was inappropriate and polemic content, and even if there's no banner, the intent is clear. Will (talk)...

does not allow propaganda, advocacy, or opinion pieces on politics. WP:POLEMIC does not allow inflammatory content in userspace. WP:BLP does not allow...

I think that the content is probably ok, even though very polemic, there are other polemic users around. The combination of the content and the username...

sources used in the article, which is just a ridiculous fringe and POV polemic that makes all sorts of groundless claims about well-known facts regarding...

that this article appears to be, instead, completely unsourced personal polemic. See generally WP:CB. Delete. --Shirahadasha 13:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)...

issue is the name, which both looks like a shortcut and turns it into a polemic -- saying that the reason someone would create a new article is because...

some kind would deny this, or try to explain it away, and only somebody polemicizing against fundies would need to stress the issue. For the rest of us a...

complaining about such a lame "polemic". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Under WP:POLEMIC: "Users should generally not...

of the content is neither neutral or verifiable - a mix of fantasy and polemic. But there is a core of real information on a notable subject. Aymatth2...

"Keep" the article's present content, however, not enter into any deep polemic about it at this stage.--Harkey (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC) The above...

slogan, but it's still a violent one, and userboxes should not contain polemic statements anyway (such is a violation of WP:USER). --Coredesat 06:25,...

article by reference to the Guru, and original research, a mixture of polemic and quotes from the original source, including in non-Western scripts referenced...

about it. Also, this userbox is not substantially divisive, inflammatory, polemic, whatever, except for those people who need to deal with the fact that...

RGloucester — ☎ 03:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:ENC / WP:NOTHERE, WP:POLEMIC, WP:NOT#BUREAUCRACY, WP:NOT#SOAPBOX, WP:NOT#ADVOCACY, WP:NOT#WEBHOST, WP:Consensus...

articulated. silviaASH (inquire within) 03:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:POLEMIC. The essay appears to be retaliation against this edit summary, which was...

Christianity, this topic is not frequently fought over by apologetic & polemic sources (unlike Kolob), nor is it covered much academically in Mormon studies...