On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable;...

this list does not meet the notability standard for standalone lists—WP:NOTESAL. I spent over an hour trying to find at least one reliable source, independent...

2011 (UTC) Comment I was going to believe that this list did not meet WP:NOTESAL requirements because the only sources for the terms were blogs and forums...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I can see how WP:NOTESAL and WP:LSC indeed apply, my mistake for not considering them when actually...

result was keep. The consensus here is that this article doesn't violate WP:NOTESAL or WP:DIRECTORY. Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC) [Hide this...

or rainbows? Songwaters (talk) 01:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL since it looks like this topic has been discussed as a grouping, as reflected...

broad principles). Also, WP:NOTESAL is not a policy, but another guideline. But NOTESAL also doesn't conflict with NOTDUP. NOTESAL says "One accepted reason...

WP:PRINCIPALNAMINGCRITERIA is applied to the article notability issues: WP:NOTESAL for lists and WP:Notability (Books) for published bibliographies inclusion...

of article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies; a quick look at WP:NOTESAL already suggests this is not notable, since there is no evidence that the...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTESAL. Wikipedia not a listing of (current) compatible devices with a streaming...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that this meets the notability criteria WP:NOTESAL. Only references are to the conference website. Rathfelder (talk) 07:41...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTESAL, cannot find any evidence that it has been discussed as a group or set...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't see that this meets the criteria at WP:NOTESAL. A few reviews aren't enough, and the parent article although possibly...

~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Keep because it satisfies WP:NOTESAL, which says, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable...

postdlf (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Keep Please also refer to WP:NOTESAL and WP:AOAL. The list itself is not required to be notable, just the group...

discussions. Sam Sailor 16:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Delete; fails WP:NOTESAL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SportingFlyer (talk • contribs)...

discussions. Human3015TALK  00:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTESAL. The items in the list seems to have been cobbled together by the creator...

this list should actually be deleted, because it does not satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Instead, I have found this article which discusses a total lack of Bangladeshi...

December 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and non-notable list per WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

can find sources for all the shows, but the article does not satisfy WP:NOTESAL. This is just one of many US tours Pink Floyd did during this stage of...

regionally. Thus this list meets the notability criteria as laid out in WP:NOTESAL. --Mike Cline (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Keep, satisfies WP:LISTPURP...

(UTC) Keep because the topic appears to meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTESAL as seen by a reference like this. However, I would suggest starting over...

MarnetteD|Talk 01:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC) Delete as failing to meet WP:NOTESAL. These listings do not meet WP:V. E.g., the Harry Potter books being called...

Ingratis (talk) 08:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - Notable list: meets WP:NOTESAL. Added further reading to the page. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 02:10, 8 April...

spelled out in WP:NOTESAL a guideline that took a lot of work to achieve consensus on back in the day. The relevant portion of WP:NOTESAL is: Notability...

fan cruft. Carrite (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL since there do not seem to be reliable sources listing items under this...

are you asserting that there is a notability problem? or what? See WP:NOTESAL for notability information for stand-alone lists. I would be amenable to...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL; this rather specific cross-categorization does not seem to be discussed...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable list per WP:NOTESAL. Also appears to be a violation of WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. PROD removed by...

Agree, this seems purposeless and there is no rationale for it in WP:NOTESAL. Schools can be redirected to their locality. Tacyarg (talk) 19:12, 22...

pieces to be taken into account, though. I believe the criteria noted in WP:NOTESAL are not measured up to: many laureates of that awards are notable by themselves...

Shellwood (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC) Delete since it fails WP:NOTESAL. Wikipedia should only have such lists if reliable sources have published...

to lack of notability. It does not meet the guidelines set forth in WP:NOTESAL. Without any real-world sourcing, listings are highly subjective and thus...

like this one currently fails WP:NOTESAL. TarkusABtalk 03:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC) I don't think this fails WP:NOTESAL. This is an article made out of multiple...

notability requirement is to show that the list itself is notable, per WP:NOTESAL. I have attempted to find a reliable source establishing the notability...

real question is whether publications on Indian military law satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Are they notable as a group? Are there, for example, professionally prepared...

there would need to be list sources supporting this kind of topic per WP:NOTESAL. I am wary of any claims of a topic being "trivial" because what is trivial...

master is irrelevant if the topic is notable enough for inclusion (see W:NOTESAL). If Obama's article was created by AndresHerutJaim, would you nominate...

WP:GNG or any of the Notability sub-requirements such as WP:SPIP or WP:NOTESAL.LethalFlowerTalk/Reply 03:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Sorry, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS--it...

individual entries, it also clearly meets the notability requirements of WP:NOTESAL. Nothing about this list runs afoul of WP:NOT. --Mike Cline (talk) 21:22...

topic. Thank you Trout71 (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NOTESAL "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more...

that article section Redirect this article and do not merge names (WP:NOTESAL, WP:SALAT) Leave as-is My view is merge due to the small amount of distinct...

member Austria in 1989 notable, and that is not what NOTESAL claims. The "group" as discussed in NOTESAL is the Austrian Army in 1989, nothing else. Fram...

(UTC) Keep Nom provides no evidence that this is WP:OR. This list meets WP:NOTESAL notability criteria with this source Bibliography of Chemistry and this...

expansive unencyclopedic lists. Reywas92Talk 18:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTESAL, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

2015 (UTC) Delete (1) There is no claim made to notability. See als WP:NOTESAL (2) This list fails WP:Stand alone lists, the selection criteria (also...

01:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Agreed. Delete per WP:NOTSTATS as well as WP:NOTESAL, too, I daresay. There are a number of accepted parameters by which to...

• Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Keep Clearly meets WP:NOTESAL notability criteria with these sources which enumerate PM&R programs as...

IIRC, suggested that the topic of killings by police officers satisfied NOTESAL on the basis of various sources. In any event the nomination was not succesful...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL because it is incredibly easy to find lists of romance films in secondary...

typical for list articles of this type to close in this manner. Indeed, WP:NOTESAL states "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability...

-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTESAL. List of current ACC basketball announcers has been nominated for deletion...

(UTC) Keep. Prisons in China are notable as a group, so this satisfies WP:NOTESAL. James500 (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Keep Nice project! The notes...

Delete Just a single reference to a reliable source The Hindu. Fails WP:NOTESAL Hagennos (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Comment- The other source...

WP:NOTTRIVIA. Ajf773 (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTESAL and WP:IINFO. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC) DeleteTrivial...

and/or WP:INDISCRIMINATE both broadly applicable. WP:LISTCRITERIA and WP:NOTESAL also relevant – this list has essentially no criteria to limit a player's...

16:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC) Delete: Although technical compliant with WP:NOTESAL, this list is a classic violation of WP:IINFO. The term animal in the context...

billion was in the US.) Those strange metrics keep it from meeting WP:NOTESAL Originally created by a undisclosed paid editor, the list is based on a...

deletion discussions. Otr500 (talk) 01:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL, as the entire body of work of This American Life has been commented on...

created it. Sundayclose (talk) 22:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:NOTESAL MSM has been retracting nothingburgers as fast as the golden arches sells...

been discussed as a group which is the notability requirement from WP:NOTESAL? --Mike Cline (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC) No, I am not sure a Bibliography...

Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - On the basis of WP:NOTESAL. This list is not notable. Citing an MOS as a reason for deletion isn't...

(UTC) Delete Agreed, it doesn't fail WP:V, but I think it does fail WP:NOTESAL. While everyone in that list is notable, I don't feel the list itself is...

you. Newshunter12 (talk) 10:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Yes, it meets WP:NOTESAL as a valid list per WP:LISTPURP. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:20, 23 September...

aftershocks listed in this article are not notable as a group as required by WP:NOTESAL, a few individual events are but the vast majority are not and neither...

requirements for stand-alone lists including notability requirements. Per WP:NOTESAL, "a list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

based on the Stand-alone list notability guideline, then we must apply WP:NOTESAL which seems to me is satisfied by this simple search: [1]. There certainly...

realise that the lists were daughter articles of a broader list satisfying NOTESAL, or failed to advert to the reliable sources present in the articles. I...

17 April 2015 (UTC) BeenAroundAWhile, why is it not encyclopedic? WP:NOTESAL covers the notability of stand-alone lists says that there can be a case...

(UTC) Keep This list meets current WP notability guidelines for lists:WP:NOTESAL as there are a great many sources that discuss Rock Instrumentals as a...

individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable (WP:NOTESAL), so your argument is irrelevant. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2014...

depends on when we start seeing independent lists of HFR films per WP:NOTESAL. We're definitely talking at least a few years' time, though. Erik (talk...

would help if the list header some effort for the article to satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Praemonitus (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Keep The article is interesting...

be my guest. Mangoe (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL since I am not seeing any list-based sources that discuss this scope at...

with popular names (People) then here's two sources that would meet WP:NOTESAL requirements: "Popular Names of Acts in US Code". Cornell Law School. Retrieved...

y" are notable. There's no overarching consensus on the matter. See WP:NOTESAL. But even if some are, this one ain't. David in DC (talk) 19:01, 4 January...

have embedded lists if a particular disease is not referenced (per WP:NOTESAL)? Erik (talk | contribs) 10:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Note: I added this...

be a lot tighter.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL because this list topic is valid and per WP:BEFORE because AfD is not clean-up...

sale-oriented. all their books are free online. Disregard WP:COMPANY as it is WP:NOTESAL. Iilluminate (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Not To Be Deleted i have...

(talk) 00:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC) I'm referring to the guidelines at WP:NOTESAL, which I referenced in my initial comment above. All your examples can...

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC) For notability of lists, see WP:NOTESAL, which states that a criterion that could make a list topic notable is...

that are independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles. WP:NOTESAL-- Star Log, Lfrankblam, Kirk Out (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC) From...

do you present that this list does not meet our notability guideline WP:NOTESAL? given the sources in the article and the additional sources mentioned...

probably wrong on the BLP status of quite a few members. This is not a WP:NOTESAL (list of X), but rather a cross-categorization of "Lists of X of Y" - in...

discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NOTESAL, all that is required is "if it has been discussed as a group or set by...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

article title. --doncram 15:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Keep - Meets the WP:NOTESAL requirements in that the subject of the list, the Trump residences, has...

newspaper access Article in mainspace with AFC template Question on Wikipedia:NOTESAL Transclude specific version of a file How do I add new content to a table...

other than WP:Indiscriminate which in this case is easily refuted via WP:NOTESAL, the list notability guideline. The following sources discuss flora of...

dnt think their aim is commercial. Seems informational to me. Only WP:NOTESAL applies. Iilluminate (talk) 19:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC) DELETE NOT REQUIRED...

by DoctorHell (talk • contribs) 14:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:NOTESAL- "Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012" is not a group or set...

UncleG suggested. Jogurney (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC) weak keep WP:NOTESAL The clubs exist, the clubs have policies that dictate certain hiring practices...

article is significant enough for its own article to be justified per WP:NOTESAL and WP:SLC; there is little to no sources discussing the specifics of each...

within a well written Wikipedia article." This is not true according to WP:NOTESAL "The absence of sources or citations in an article (as distinct from the...

Delete The applicable notability guideline that nobody has brought up is WP:NOTESAL, which would require substantial RS coverage of people who have walked...

ESRoads (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NOTESAL. This list isn't discussed by independent reliable sources, nor is there...

Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC) Keep as a notable topic per WP:NOTESAL. No policy-based or guideline-based argument was put forth in the nomination...

that this article also adheres to the criteria for Stand-alone lists: WP: NOTESAL. Compositions for viola as a collection have been discussed by multiple...

2020 (UTC) Merge prose to Lists of fictional locations because per WP:NOTESAL, this topic has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

bibliography" as needed Strengthen leads, inclusion criteria and sourcing per WP:NOTESAL as necessary to improve existing bibliographies Add infoboxes to author...

January 2017 (UTC) Keep. This kind of list is not a question about WP:NOTESAL, it is a list with a clear inclusion criteria that serves well as a navigational...

22:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Comment: I created this article based on WP:NOTESAL, which says, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable...

cross-comparisons in reliable sources that would demonstrate notability under WP:NOTESAL. (Will change !vote if such citations are added.) —chaos5023 (talk) 20:15...

 — Calvin999 18:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Oppose As is, does not pass WP:NOTESAL: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

notable list topic (having implemented two list sources just now) per WP:NOTESAL. The article is indeed largely a mess, but it is so easy to find sources...

on Stand Alone Lists - it exists within our notability policy, From WP:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

RockMagnetist(talk) 18:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC) I don't see that WP:NOTESAL ever came into consideration during the "no consensus" discussion. I have...

completeness! I relied on guidance from the Stand-alone lists section of WP:NOTESAL, specifically that notability is not required for individual list items...

- I am this article's creator. I am not sure which way to interpret WP:NOTESAL, but I appreciate it's authority in this discussion. Mark Schierbecker...

only plausible reason for deletion would be that this list violates WP:NOTESAL which the listed sources demonstrate is not the case. Ill-concieved and...

the point in them. Otherwise, the guideline wouldn't say it is. Also, WP:NOTESAL says "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources...

notability of the list itself. The notability guideline to look at here are WP:NOTESAL. The first paragraph states, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered...

based on WP:FRINGE advice about eating invasive species - doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL, the list has not "been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

(talk) 22:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Keep as a notable list topic per WP:NOTESAL as evidenced by Andrew. A quick Google search also revealed this, this...

this page be redirected to a list of publishers? They must satisfy WP:NOTESAL as a group, and that allows for the inclusion of individually non-notable...

(UTC) Delete. Trivial, cross-categorization LISTCRUFT that fails [[WP:NOTESAL]]. Sam Sailor 09:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. Absolutely useless trivia...

 — Calvin999 18:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Oppose As is, does not pass WP:NOTESAL: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

14:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Keep since such a list appears notable per WP:NOTESAL, seeing the inline citations used. However, I recommend rewording the lead...

on Rotten Tomatoes. The next question is, is a list justified? Per WP:NOTESAL, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

member Austria in 1989 notable, and that is not what NOTESAL claims. The "group" as discussed in NOTESAL is the Austrian Army in 1989, nothing else. Fram...

not.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 19:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTESAL, this topic has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

Israeli incident, already with a wiki article Shai Dromi ** Wikipedia:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

requirements for stand-alone lists including notability requirements. Per WP:NOTESAL, "a list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

criteria is not objective, not useful and non encyclopedic. See also WP:NOTESAL. Marokwitz (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC) Delete WP should not repost...

passes WP:GNG but surely there's more to the discussion than that. WP:NOTESAL unfortunately doesn't give much help. Masem when this and similar discussions...

spelled out in WP:NOTESAL a guideline that took a lot of work to achieve consensus on back in the day. The relevant portion of WP:NOTESAL is: Notability...

the N10 in Ireland, the A10 in France etc etc etc) and consequently WP:NOTESAL is not satisfied as the set is not notable, and hence a random bit of indiscriminate...

the general requirements for lists lower? Or am I misunderstanding WP:NOTESAL? Because wouldn't they be notable as a set under that criteria? Clovermoss...

result was keep. The consensus here is that this article doesn't violate WP:NOTESAL or WP:DIRECTORY. Liz Read! Talk! 03:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC) List of...

including format and sourcing. The notability issue is discussed in WP:NOTESAL and WP:LISTPURP. I get impatient with this wikilawyering. The point is...

contain a table comparing characteristics of such software. Per Wikipedia:NOTESAL, it seems like I can create since Systematic review#Review tools is already...

first nomination: The topic appears to meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTESAL as seen by a reference like this. However, I would suggest starting over...

think we all kind of understand that. Redirecting to a page such as WP:NOTESAL - which is about when a list is notable - might be appropriate. However...

per WP:PERFCAT. A list would be more appropriate, assuming it meant WP:NOTESAL. Contrary to popular belief, Wikipedia is not a database or waste bin of...

question in light of this very clear and consensus based guideline in WP:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

this list does not meet the notability standard for standalone lists—WP:NOTESAL. I spent over an hour trying to find at least one reliable source, independent...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I can see how WP:NOTESAL and WP:LSC indeed apply, my mistake for not considering them when actually...

question in light of this very clear and consensus based guideline in WP:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

applicable guidelines in your comments about the list. According to WP:NOTESAL, "... One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if...

thought and appreciate your review of the sources. However, I believe WP:NOTESAL directly addresse your concern. "The entirety of the list does not need...

broad principles). Also, WP:NOTESAL is not a policy, but another guideline. But NOTESAL also doesn't conflict with NOTDUP. NOTESAL says "One accepted reason...

realise that the lists were daughter articles of a broader list satisfying NOTESAL, or failed to advert to the reliable sources present in the articles. I...

~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC) Keep because it satisfies WP:NOTESAL, which says, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable...

remain unsourced. The arguments against are that the articles fail WP:N, WP:NOTESAL, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL, WP:SAL amongst others The arguments for are that...

does not exist in a vacuum for establishing new articles only. See WP:NOTESAL "Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists...

postdlf (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Keep Please also refer to WP:NOTESAL and WP:AOAL. The list itself is not required to be notable, just the group...

like this one currently fails WP:NOTESAL. TarkusABtalk 03:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC) I don't think this fails WP:NOTESAL. This is an article made out of multiple...

that notability guidelines pertain to the main article, please see WP:NOTESAL, "Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists...

created it. Sundayclose (talk) 22:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Speedy delete - WP:NOTESAL MSM has been retracting nothingburgers as fast as the golden arches sells...

(UTC) Keep because the topic appears to meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTESAL as seen by a reference like this. However, I would suggest starting over...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL because it is incredibly easy to find lists of romance films in secondary...

the general requirements for lists lower? Or am I misunderstanding WP:NOTESAL? Because wouldn't they be notable as a set under that criteria? Clovermoss...

been discussed as a group which is the notability requirement from WP:NOTESAL? --Mike Cline (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Keep. A point that nobody...

this list should actually be deleted, because it does not satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Instead, I have found this article which discusses a total lack of Bangladeshi...

2011 (UTC) Comment I was going to believe that this list did not meet WP:NOTESAL requirements because the only sources for the terms were blogs and forums...

you. Newshunter12 (talk) 10:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Yes, it meets WP:NOTESAL as a valid list per WP:LISTPURP. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:20, 23 September...

on Rotten Tomatoes. The next question is, is a list justified? Per WP:NOTESAL, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

by DoctorHell (talk • contribs) 14:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:NOTESAL- "Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012" is not a group or set...

14:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Keep since such a list appears notable per WP:NOTESAL, seeing the inline citations used. However, I recommend rewording the lead...

2020 (UTC) Merge prose to Lists of fictional locations because per WP:NOTESAL, this topic has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

be my guest. Mangoe (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL since I am not seeing any list-based sources that discuss this scope at...

expansive unencyclopedic lists. Reywas92Talk 18:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTESAL, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

or rainbows? Songwaters (talk) 01:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has...

with popular names (People) then here's two sources that would meet WP:NOTESAL requirements: "Popular Names of Acts in US Code". Cornell Law School. Retrieved...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL; this rather specific cross-categorization does not seem to be discussed...

article is significant enough for its own article to be justified per WP:NOTESAL and WP:SLC; there is little to no sources discussing the specifics of each...

of article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Bibliographies; a quick look at WP:NOTESAL already suggests this is not notable, since there is no evidence that the...

including format and sourcing. The notability issue is discussed in WP:NOTESAL and WP:LISTPURP. I get impatient with this wikilawyering. The point is...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL since it looks like this topic has been discussed as a grouping, as reflected...

been discussed as a group which is the notability requirement from WP:NOTESAL? --Mike Cline (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Comment. A point that...

discussions. Sam Sailor 16:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Delete; fails WP:NOTESAL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SportingFlyer (talk • contribs)...

17 April 2015 (UTC) BeenAroundAWhile, why is it not encyclopedic? WP:NOTESAL covers the notability of stand-alone lists says that there can be a case...

Israeli incident, already with a wiki article Shai Dromi ** Wikipedia:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

(UTC) Keep. Prisons in China are notable as a group, so this satisfies WP:NOTESAL. James500 (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Keep Nice project! The notes...

typical for list articles of this type to close in this manner. Indeed, WP:NOTESAL states "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability...

individual entries, it also clearly meets the notability requirements of WP:NOTESAL. Nothing about this list runs afoul of WP:NOT. --Mike Cline (talk) 21:22...

(UTC) Keep Nom provides no evidence that this is WP:OR. This list meets WP:NOTESAL notability criteria with this source Bibliography of Chemistry and this...

the point in them. Otherwise, the guideline wouldn't say it is. Also, WP:NOTESAL says "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources...

can find sources for all the shows, but the article does not satisfy WP:NOTESAL. This is just one of many US tours Pink Floyd did during this stage of...

applicable guidelines in your comments about the list. According to WP:NOTESAL, "... One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if...

December 2012 (UTC) creator keep AFD was just completed 4 months ago. WP:NOTESAL The overall topic is discussed in numerous studies, books and articles...

article title. --doncram 15:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Keep - Meets the WP:NOTESAL requirements in that the subject of the list, the Trump residences, has...

Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC) Keep as a notable topic per WP:NOTESAL. No policy-based or guideline-based argument was put forth in the nomination...

be a lot tighter.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL because this list topic is valid and per WP:BEFORE because AfD is not clean-up...

WP:GNG or any of the Notability sub-requirements such as WP:SPIP or WP:NOTESAL.LethalFlowerTalk/Reply 03:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Sorry, but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS--it...

discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Keep - per WP:NOTESAL, all that is required is "if it has been discussed as a group or set by...

fan cruft. Carrite (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESAL since there do not seem to be reliable sources listing items under this...

- I am this article's creator. I am not sure which way to interpret WP:NOTESAL, but I appreciate it's authority in this discussion. Mark Schierbecker...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NOTESAL, cannot find any evidence that it has been discussed as a group or set...

sale-oriented. all their books are free online. Disregard WP:COMPANY as it is WP:NOTESAL. Iilluminate (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Not To Be Deleted i have...

been discussed as a group which is the notability requirement from WP:NOTESAL? --Mike Cline (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Keep. A point that nobody...

regardless of any ping. These monthly tornado lists satisfy the criteria of WP:NOTESAL, since they are an aggregation of yearly tornado activity in the United...

pieces to be taken into account, though. I believe the criteria noted in WP:NOTESAL are not measured up to: many laureates of that awards are notable by themselves...

unencyclopedic. Piriczki (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTESAL Notability guidelines apply to stand alone lists: [a list is] considered...

have embedded lists if a particular disease is not referenced (per WP:NOTESAL)? Erik (talk | contribs) 10:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Note: I added this...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

notability of the list itself. The notability guideline to look at here are WP:NOTESAL. The first paragraph states, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered...

notability requirement is to show that the list itself is notable, per WP:NOTESAL. I have attempted to find a reliable source establishing the notability...

completeness! I relied on guidance from the Stand-alone lists section of WP:NOTESAL, specifically that notability is not required for individual list items...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

based on the Stand-alone list notability guideline, then we must apply WP:NOTESAL which seems to me is satisfied by this simple search: [18]. There certainly...

(UTC) Delete Agreed, it doesn't fail WP:V, but I think it does fail WP:NOTESAL. While everyone in that list is notable, I don't feel the list itself is...

WP:NOTTRIVIA. Ajf773 (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTESAL and WP:IINFO. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC) DeleteTrivial...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

and/or WP:INDISCRIMINATE both broadly applicable. WP:LISTCRITERIA and WP:NOTESAL also relevant – this list has essentially no criteria to limit a player's...

is a valid reason to delete the whole standalone list, According to WP:NOTESAL: "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and...

Perhaps historical associations might be notable as a group. Perhaps WP:NOTESAL applies. Perhaps we could have a list of historical associations and merge...

Delete Just a single reference to a reliable source The Hindu. Fails WP:NOTESAL Hagennos (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Comment- The other source...

is a valid reason to delete the whole standalone list, According to WP:NOTESAL: "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

topic. Thank you Trout71 (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NOTESAL "There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more...

(talk) 22:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Keep as a notable list topic per WP:NOTESAL as evidenced by Andrew. A quick Google search also revealed this, this...

individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable (WP:NOTESAL), so your argument is irrelevant. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2014...

do you present that this list does not meet our notability guideline WP:NOTESAL? given the sources in the article and the additional sources mentioned...

real question is whether publications on Indian military law satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Are they notable as a group? Are there, for example, professionally prepared...

y" are notable. There's no overarching consensus on the matter. See WP:NOTESAL. But even if some are, this one ain't. David in DC (talk) 19:01, 4 January...

there would need to be list sources supporting this kind of topic per WP:NOTESAL. I am wary of any claims of a topic being "trivial" because what is trivial...

cross-comparisons in reliable sources that would demonstrate notability under WP:NOTESAL. (Will change !vote if such citations are added.) —chaos5023 (talk) 20:15...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't see that this meets the criteria at WP:NOTESAL. A few reviews aren't enough, and the parent article although possibly...

MarnetteD|Talk 01:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC) Delete as failing to meet WP:NOTESAL. These listings do not meet WP:V. E.g., the Harry Potter books being called...

(talk) 00:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC) I'm referring to the guidelines at WP:NOTESAL, which I referenced in my initial comment above. All your examples can...

UncleG suggested. Jogurney (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC) weak keep WP:NOTESAL The clubs exist, the clubs have policies that dictate certain hiring practices...

the N10 in Ireland, the A10 in France etc etc etc) and consequently WP:NOTESAL is not satisfied as the set is not notable, and hence a random bit of indiscriminate...

depends on when we start seeing independent lists of HFR films per WP:NOTESAL. We're definitely talking at least a few years' time, though. Erik (talk...

-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NOTESAL. List of current ACC basketball announcers has been nominated for deletion...

other than WP:Indiscriminate which in this case is easily refuted via WP:NOTESAL, the list notability guideline. The following sources discuss flora of...

Agree, this seems purposeless and there is no rationale for it in WP:NOTESAL. Schools can be redirected to their locality. Tacyarg (talk) 19:12, 22...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

to lack of notability. It does not meet the guidelines set forth in WP:NOTESAL. Without any real-world sourcing, listings are highly subjective and thus...

probably wrong on the BLP status of quite a few members. This is not a WP:NOTESAL (list of X), but rather a cross-categorization of "Lists of X of Y" - in...

that article section Redirect this article and do not merge names (WP:NOTESAL, WP:SALAT) Leave as-is My view is merge due to the small amount of distinct...

on Stand Alone Lists - it exists within our notability policy, From WP:NOTESAL A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group...

(talk) 16:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Keep Draftify as a notable list per WP:NOTESAL since "it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

regionally. Thus this list meets the notability criteria as laid out in WP:NOTESAL. --Mike Cline (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Keep, satisfies WP:LISTPURP...

passes WP:GNG but surely there's more to the discussion than that. WP:NOTESAL unfortunately doesn't give much help. Masem when this and similar discussions...

criteria is not objective, not useful and non encyclopedic. See also WP:NOTESAL. Marokwitz (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC) Delete WP should not repost...

01:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC) Agreed. Delete per WP:NOTSTATS as well as WP:NOTESAL, too, I daresay. There are a number of accepted parameters by which to...

(UTC) Keep This list meets current WP notability guidelines for lists:WP:NOTESAL as there are a great many sources that discuss Rock Instrumentals as a...

not.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 19:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTESAL, this topic has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

this page be redirected to a list of publishers? They must satisfy WP:NOTESAL as a group, and that allows for the inclusion of individually non-notable...

would help if the list header some effort for the article to satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Praemonitus (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC) Keep The article is interesting...

RockMagnetist(talk) 18:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC) I don't see that WP:NOTESAL ever came into consideration during the "no consensus" discussion. I have...

are you asserting that there is a notability problem? or what? See WP:NOTESAL for notability information for stand-alone lists. I would be amenable to...

December 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and non-notable list per WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

2012 (UTC) Keep This appears to meet notability for lists (See Wikipedia:NOTESAL#Stand-alone_lists, and it can be demonstrated that these people have been...

IIRC, suggested that the topic of killings by police officers satisfied NOTESAL on the basis of various sources. In any event the nomination was not succesful...

that are independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles. WP:NOTESAL-- Star Log, Lfrankblam, Kirk Out (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC) From...

notable list topic (having implemented two list sources just now) per WP:NOTESAL. The article is indeed largely a mess, but it is so easy to find sources...

ESRoads (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC) Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NOTESAL. This list isn't discussed by independent reliable sources, nor is there...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not a notable list per WP:NOTESAL. Also appears to be a violation of WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. PROD removed by...

are touched upon in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, available in WP:NOTESAL. Interestingly, Category:Crimes committed by illegal immigrants was deleted...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence that this meets the notability criteria WP:NOTESAL. Only references are to the conference website. Rathfelder (talk) 07:41...

based on WP:FRINGE advice about eating invasive species - doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL, the list has not "been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

members must have reliable sourcing for both categories. However, per WP:NOTESAL if the list topic is receiving reliable 3rd party coverage, the list topic...

only plausible reason for deletion would be that this list violates WP:NOTESAL which the listed sources demonstrate is not the case. Ill-concieved and...

Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - On the basis of WP:NOTESAL. This list is not notable. Citing an MOS as a reason for deletion isn't...

January 2017 (UTC) Keep. This kind of list is not a question about WP:NOTESAL, it is a list with a clear inclusion criteria that serves well as a navigational...

(UTC) Delete. Trivial, cross-categorization LISTCRUFT that fails [[WP:NOTESAL]]. Sam Sailor 09:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC) Delete. Absolutely useless trivia...

• Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Keep Clearly meets WP:NOTESAL notability criteria with these sources which enumerate PM&R programs as...

first nomination: The topic appears to meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTESAL as seen by a reference like this. However, I would suggest starting over...

discussions. Human3015TALK  00:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTESAL. The items in the list seems to have been cobbled together by the creator...

16:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC) Delete: Although technical compliant with WP:NOTESAL, this list is a classic violation of WP:IINFO. The term animal in the context...

2012 (UTC) Keep This appears to meet notability for lists (See Wikipedia:NOTESAL#Stand-alone_lists, and it can be demonstrated that these people have been...

(talk) 16:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Keep Draftify as a notable list per WP:NOTESAL since "it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable...

2015 (UTC) Delete (1) There is no claim made to notability. See als WP:NOTESAL (2) This list fails WP:Stand alone lists, the selection criteria (also...

Shellwood (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC) Delete since it fails WP:NOTESAL. Wikipedia should only have such lists if reliable sources have published...

December 2012 (UTC) creator keep AFD was just completed 4 months ago. WP:NOTESAL The overall topic is discussed in numerous studies, books and articles...

unencyclopedic. Piriczki (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTESAL Notability guidelines apply to stand alone lists: [a list is] considered...

and above editors. This list is original research, and doesn't meet WP:NOTESAL. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - This set...

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC) For notability of lists, see WP:NOTESAL, which states that a criterion that could make a list topic notable is...

almost every planet listed has its own article. This is covered a bit in WP:NOTESAL but this is essentially a list of planets that are considered notable,...

Delete The applicable notability guideline that nobody has brought up is WP:NOTESAL, which would require substantial RS coverage of people who have walked...

are touched upon in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, available in WP:NOTESAL. Interestingly, Category:Crimes committed by illegal immigrants was deleted...

Perhaps historical associations might be notable as a group. Perhaps WP:NOTESAL applies. Perhaps we could have a list of historical associations and merge...

argument is that most of the individual items aren't notable, but per WP:NOTESAL and many other video game list articles, this is evidently not a problem...

discographies tend to be "list" articles, and list articles need to meet WP:NOTESAL. Your best bet is if the particular discography has been "discussed as...

something it shouldn't be included. Reyk YO! 23:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTESAL (which I'd imagine the name articles qualify as) says "Editors are still...

WP:N guideline has a section about stand-alone lists, WP:NLIST aka WP:NOTESAL. This is not to be confused with our guideline about stand-alone lists...

that this article also adheres to the criteria for Stand-alone lists: WP: NOTESAL. Compositions for viola as a collection have been discussed by multiple...

argument is that most of the individual items aren't notable, but per WP:NOTESAL and many other video game list articles, this is evidently not a problem...

means "lead actress". 4. Also, for the standalone list. According to WP:NOTESAL, "Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list...

"original research" here? All the items have references. In addition, WP:NOTESAL says, "Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the...

consensus, i.e. guidelines, and MOS does not support this view, e.g. WP:NOTESAL, WP:LSC. In the current Wikiproject discussion, a past discussion was linked...

org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone_lists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTESAL WP:LISTNAME WP:NCLIST WP:NCSAL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SALLEAD...

WP:N guideline has a section about stand-alone lists, WP:NLIST aka WP:NOTESAL. This is not to be confused with our guideline about stand-alone lists...

master is irrelevant if the topic is notable enough for inclusion (see W:NOTESAL). If Obama's article was created by AndresHerutJaim, would you nominate...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTESAL. Wikipedia not a listing of (current) compatible devices with a streaming...

regardless of any ping. These monthly tornado lists satisfy the criteria of WP:NOTESAL, since they are an aggregation of yearly tornado activity in the United...

thought and appreciate your review of the sources. However, I believe WP:NOTESAL directly addresse your concern. "The entirety of the list does not need...

almost every planet listed has its own article. This is covered a bit in WP:NOTESAL but this is essentially a list of planets that are considered notable,...

Ingratis (talk) 08:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC) Keep - Notable list: meets WP:NOTESAL. Added further reading to the page. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 02:10, 8 April...

22:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Comment: I created this article based on WP:NOTESAL, which says, "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable...

aftershocks listed in this article are not notable as a group as required by WP:NOTESAL, a few individual events are but the vast majority are not and neither...

deletion discussions. Otr500 (talk) 01:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTESAL, as the entire body of work of This American Life has been commented on...

billion was in the US.) Those strange metrics keep it from meeting WP:NOTESAL Originally created by a undisclosed paid editor, the list is based on a...