not tolerated and may result in a ban. Shortcuts WP:NOTCOMPULSORYWP:NOTCOMPULSORY WP:CHOICEWP:CHOICE Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require...

contribs), whose last portal-space contribs were later that month[2]. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so no criticism of Kanogul, but the portal has had no maintainer since...

template. Such demands violate the spirit of policies at WP:BURDEN, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and WP:BATTLEGROUND. Such demands may be perceived as unreasonable...

You fix it. ~2025-34213-64 (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Keep. there is...

at large at some point, because ArbCom says that it overrides the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy; but when I search for it, all I can find are failed policy proposals...

before apparently moving on to other things, which is of course fine. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ssolbergj (talk · contribs) did some tweaking the next day, but there...

to get the same results. Fails overwhelmingly, with reference to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Moved to second RfC. Fails by a wide margin. Fails nearly unanimously...

abandoned after creation. That's no criticism of Metalworker14; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and any editor is entitled to move on to other interests. All the subpages...

WP:FIXIT This seems to violate core Wikipedia policy, specifically, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It's fine to encourage people to edit, but this title only serves as...

think it's counterproductive, don't feel the need to comment: see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Amisom (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Amison, I didn’t mean to imply...

who also created the subpages, and then moved on to other things. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so that's fine. However, nobody else did anything with the portal apart...

the idea is that one can do as much or little as one wishes (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Therefore people are at liberty to create unreferenced stubs, which...

force someone to work on the article, contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...

basically abandoned thereafter. That's no criticism of the editor; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are entirely free to move on to other things ... but a decision...

coverage, fulfilling that criterion. @User:Sandstein: Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is not the job of other editors to make the case in either direction...

kangaroo court. I'm used to policies and guidelines, as well as WP:NOTCOMPULSORY as far as requiring users to sign up. Shrug.—Bagumba (talk) 02:51, 23...

maintained. Ihcoyc's last portalspace edit was in March 2008.[2] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so an editor is entitled to move on to other interests, but the community...

per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, it is against Wikipedia policy for a maintainer to be required. North America1000 18:48, 13 April 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY says...

abandoned apart from formatting changes. That's no criticism of Mar4d. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are fully entitled to move on to other things. However,...

2011, one in early 2013, and nothing in the 6 years since then.[1] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are free to move on other interests. However portals still...

Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC) This likewise applies...

the code). Pldx1 (talk) 14:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC) Comment – Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, the notion of a mandatory maintainer for content is against Wikipedia...

double for Hammer. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ajf773 (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC) "Focus on improving the...

December 2016 (UTC) On the English Wikipedia, ArbCom has ruled that WP:NOTCOMPULSORY does not apply to admins. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)...

to bed rather than bringing the nominator more shrubberies. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...

guideline about Wikipedia content as stated above whatsoever. See also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, where it's stated (in part), "Wikipedia is a volunteer community, and...

00:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC) @Robert McClenon: Regarding updates, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY could be part of the reason why. North America1000 00:08, 13 April 2019...

they have no interest whatsoever in this portal (and please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY), so your pipe-dream votes should hold no weight. Aside from a very...

hasn't touched any part of it since this edit in February 2011. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so the creator is entitled to move on to other interests. But Wikipedia...

they wish, including moving on from work which they started. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) So what we have here is a choice of a broken (and apparently never-completed)...

anything. You wanted comments (see here [2]), I provided some. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC) I'm impressed with how the article...

prose, and stop assigning responsibilities to others as Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY.—Bagumba (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Delete with the same reasoning...

a Wikipedia:Wikibreak from AFD. Just a reminder that AFD work is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and there are other solid editors active at AFD. If a topic is truly...

a such key agency in the USSR reek of WP:Other stuff exists and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies before patronizing others...

Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines § Second sentence contradicts WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy, and should be removed Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines § Concerning...

out to do it alone, but sooner or later moved on to other things. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so they are entitled to do move on, but this portal has already been...

circa 2010. This is another fact and a great occasion to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. And when someone criticized my description of the 2019 versions as...

contribs), whose last edit to the portal was in November 2007[1]. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are quite entitled to move on to other interests, and this...

User:Northamerica1000. Due to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, no one can compulse you to click on this blue link and read again what the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy says exactly. But...

Kylekieran's last edit to any part of the portal was in August 2012.[3] WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so editors are entitled to move on. But portals need ongoing maintenance...

to give any assurances on what you plan to do in the future; see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. But unless some editors give some such credible assurances or can point...

Redolta's last portal-space edit[1] was 18 months ago, in late 2017. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so Redolta and every other is fully entitled to edit whenever and wherever...

many purposes it is at the disposal of the Foundation. Of course WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and it is good to have full time staff to drive these things through...

June 6 is not. 77.11.125.202 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC) See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is his choice whether he wants to close this TfD and if he does...

to make demands on how other volunteers should spend their time (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? 192.76.8.86 (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Comment x2 As there appears...

agreements to maintain portals that have not been kept. The argument of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is true but irrelevant. Keeping a portal is optional; maintaining a...

idea, turn around and demand they do the rest of the work? Do read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, please, and when you've done so, please decide whether you want to...

Pakieditor (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC) Of course, @Pakieditor. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Like everyone else here, you're a volunteer. You manage your own time...

the opposition was significantly stronger in terms of policy (see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) and practical arguments. Editors had issues with using an ultimatum...

often, but forgotten where they were. For the second, there's also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC) I tend to link to WP:SODOIT...

input"), and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY limits this RfC's ability to go beyond this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. We cannot force...

anything. You wanted comments (see here [11]), I provided some. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC) I'm impressed with how the article...

to the answer to a question above, where the candidate linked to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. So we have someone who has been around long enough that we would have...

--Guy Macon (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC) Well, Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so you'll have to run your own cost-benefit analysis on whether or...

You did mention that I was trying your patience, though. Well, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY applies to admins as well, I would imagine. You're a volunteer, right...

change based on this thread. It should be noted that editing is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. As the person in question is, no doubt, enjoying all this fuss I would...

in the past, there seems to be a distinct lac of volunteers, and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Likewise for the "probation officer" approach. And on a more mundane...

contribs) 19:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC) @Afrodizifunk3: just so you know WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. MarnetteD|Talk 19:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

or ignore them and work elsewhere, and either way I must invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY to do so. Muffinator (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC) (involved editor)...

statement was in fact a lie (meant to deceive). 54129 knows about WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and so questions Husond's apparent need to deceive, about which the...

a user edits, and what does it mean for it to be "sustainable"? WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, people. User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 01:49, 2 July...

categorically impossible for me to pile work on you. Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:VOLUNTEER. You are painting me as stubborn for marking a redirect...

experienced" editors. Everyone is volunteering their time here and, per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, they can choose when to disengage with the project in whole or with...

opposing editor in the dispute: Oh my. What a tantrum. Oh well, bye...WP:NOTCOMPULSORY That thread makes me want to quit, what a bunch of whinging bullshit...

sort of "required" maintainer goes squarely against the grain of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, part of the WP:NOT policy page, where it states, "Wikipedia is a volunteer...

am a bad Wikipedian for not being a frequent editor: [64] - given WP:NOTCOMPULSORY this comment was pure bullying Falsely claiming that I am topic banned...

would have been better achieved if the subject had responded, but WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Even some input from someone not involved in the discussion would have...

article with a valid PD image and then want to be left alone per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. I'd still like to know why the bot tagged the image for deletion when...

with you", which any editor is entitled to do for whatever reason (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Instead the only comments they made to object to the principle of...

Trinidad and Tobago portal, than spending time here. Unfortunately WP:NOTCOMPULSORY does not seem to apply here, and clearly there are those that enjoy...

can be criticised for their non-participation, in part due to the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY argument, but also since the above discussion cannot reasonably be said...

effectively even if the "defence" is poor or non-existent - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Sansdtein should have been satisfied with redacting TParis' comment...

respond to something, assuming you have no WP:MESS to clean up (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY / WP:VOLUNTEER). However, restoring the edit without waiting for discussion—noting...

gravely misunderstand the basic nature of Wikipedia's policies (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:OWNBEHAVIOR, etc.) (B) I don't like Armatura threatened to report...

14:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Support ArbCom has already struck down WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for admins. The amount of activity required is not great, and if it...

norm that the community expects editors to follow) it goes against WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC) I'd like to find...

enforcing this? Sergecross73 msg me 18:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. WikiP is a voluntary organization not a "professional" one. I am sorry...

Blueboar (talk) 12:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC) Because Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:There is no deadline. There are any number of reasons why an...

(talk) 22:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC) I'm a stalwart proponent of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY etc: indeed no one is required to proactively do anything. The point...

encyclopedia. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 03:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC) *yawn*. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I don't have to be doing it as long as you to be doing it right. Thank...

BHG made arguments about needing volunteers that to me go against WP:NOTCOMPULSORY.[195]—Bagumba (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC) BrownHairedGirl makes...

pending expansion. Applicable policies include WP:ATD, WP:NONENG; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY; WP:NOTPAPER; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC) I'd be...

consume vast swathes of their time, effectively going counter to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY not to mention the stress that it engenders. Current word length: 1058;...

delete portal tracking categories. NA1K's repeated bogus claims taht WP:NOTCOMPULSORY bans any requirement for a portal to have a named maintainer. And now...

i noted the lack of interest from WikiProjects. Bagumba invokes WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, but chooses to omit the subsequent discussion ([7], several posts by...

minimize non-free use. --Masem (t) 16:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, Wikipedia editors are volunteers who are entitled to be as lazy as...

the community and Arbitration Committee. How does that uphold the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy? I don't think editors are ever required to do things they don't...

to keep. To address the first concern, I would like to point to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and (again) to WP:COI. That is, you are not required to spend any of...

as a portal maintainer because I wanted to, and particularly per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, nothing more. There is no "game" here. The assessments for Ghana-related...

force someone to work on the article, contrary to WP:NOTCLEANUP and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...

cases. BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I am tired of working on this page today. I will refrain unless I am...

double for Hammer. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Ajf773 (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC) "Focus on improving the...

rot noted above. If Antony-22's interests have moved on, then per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY that's fine, a choice they are entitled to make without reproach. But...

to keep. To address the first concern, I would like to point to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and (again) to WP:COI. That is, you are not required to spend any of...

may need to step away until this MFD is finished. 6) Remember that WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and you can log off so as not to see the userbox. MarnetteD|Talk 21:48...

field. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: your time is voluntary WP:TFD#REASONS: it is redundant to a better-designed...

to bed rather than bringing the nominator more shrubberies. See WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: "Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding...

them, take it up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Wikipedia:NOTCOMPULSORY also applies here, as you're free from not debating with them. If they...

understand the reason given in the answer to Q10, additionally keeping WP:NOTCOMPULSORY in mind, and noting that any decision made now will be perceived as...

the idea is that one can do as much or little as one wishes (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY). Therefore people are at liberty to create unreferenced stubs, which...

Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC) This likewise applies...

coverage, fulfilling that criterion. @User:Sandstein: Please see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. It is not the job of other editors to make the case in either direction...

guideline about Wikipedia content as stated above whatsoever. See also WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, where it's stated (in part), "Wikipedia is a volunteer community, and...

pending expansion. Applicable policies include WP:ATD, WP:NONENG; WP:NOTCOMPULSORY; WP:NOTPAPER; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC) I'd be...

the community and Arbitration Committee. How does that uphold the WP:NOTCOMPULSORY policy? I don't think editors are ever required to do things they don't...

editing or moved on to other topics, and the portal rotted for years. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so any editor is fully entitled to move on without reproach, but that's...

manage to make all things perfect at once, knowing that Wikipedia is NOTCOMPULSORY. Actually the 5 groups of categories proposed for discussion here come...

for this, or numerous other kinds of templates for that matter (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? Dl2000 (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Am I wrong that...

November 2022 (UTC) isaacl: it’s true bureaucrats have a pocket veto in WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, however there would be no way for a single bureaucrat to prevent all...

84.101 (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 3) Policy. See also, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and in particular WP:CHOICE, which trumps essays (and also methinks...

just to find out it's all being scrapped... but alas, that's why WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I think elements of all of these articles could be incorporated elsewhere...

00:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC) @Viriditas: I basically have to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY on that. The fight over this went on pretty much all day every day for...

73 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 19 November 2014‎ (UTC) Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, every editor can contribute in the manner that is most appropriate...

encyclopedia. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 03:14, 8 June 2012 (UTC) *yawn*. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I don't have to be doing it as long as you to be doing it right. Thank...

pictures-robots). The baby seems dead, but I will use the famous WP:NOTCOMPULSORY to avoid looking further. A great case of Let the dead bury the dead...

January 2024 (UTC) You have not offered a compromise, and it is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for me to edit the article Law of India. I intend to withdraw from this...

in the article. On the other hand, fulfilling such a request is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Whether material should stand on a page while verifiability of a translation...

00:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC) @Viriditas: I basically have to invoke WP:NOTCOMPULSORY on that. The fight over this went on pretty much all day every day for...

BHGbot 4. And since I am a volunteer like any other editor, then per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I am free to make my own decision about whether to open a WP:BRFA request...

groups of users to do certain things - they should "request" - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Recent mass revocations of outdated general sanctions (the first initiated...

long-term problems. And for three years, you hadn't been pro-active. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so if your priorities and interests had moved elsewhere, then that's...

we'll see each other at ANI. Banedon (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is required reading here. You're asking Jayron here (for example) to...

aren't being violated. It's primarily non-COI issues related to WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:IDHT, WP:BLUDGEON, and, today, WP:ASPERSIONS. BC1278 is turning...

(and regretably I will not be attempting to fix them myself per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, due to unnecessarily unpleasant previous memories of unsuccessfully...

2016 (UTC) WP:SOFIXIT. -Kudzu1 (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Masem is free to criticize the article's state, that doesn't mean that...

place to complain about that would normally be WP:ERRORS, and, per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I'm not yet sure I want to bother to do that, given the difficulty...

Info on this can be found in Breakthrough's News article (but per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO I'm currently rather reluctant to try to do this myself due...

Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC) @CaptainEek: Of course, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. But before I start unpacking the case of WP:TROUT, you unprotected...

go to bed, and I'm not sure I want to spend time on it today (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO if necessary). Maybe the CNs will get fixed as Americans...

groups of users to do certain things - they should "request" - per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Recent mass revocations of outdated general sanctions (the first initiated...

so I almost certainly won't be attempting to do so myself (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and WP:BNO).Tlhslobus (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC) The discussion...

long-term problems. And for three years, you hadn't been pro-active. WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so if your priorities and interests had moved elsewhere, then that's...

not included in the Impacts section. I feel neither willing (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY) nor properly able to fix it myself. And quite likely the problem will...

Thanks for the suggestion. I may try it later, but probably not (per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, WP:BNO, etc), tho anybody else who wanted to have a go would almost...

acknowledged by wikipedia should be determined by consensus." It is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for us to do so. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC) A...

You fix it. ~2025-34213-64 (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Keep. there is...

search for, find and add that source within 30 days. In view of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, there is no reason to assume that anyone will do that, not even the...

time that their action can be challenged. It's a trivial result of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, not a counter to the way G5 works. Endorse * Pppery * it has begun...

one who mentioned that anyone 'should' do anything, I'm well aware of NOTCOMPULSORY. Djmaschek only referred to the material as unsourced, so I assumed...

definition of Wikipedia:Be bold. As for "I shouldn't have to fix it, see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. AdmiralCarl (talk) | :) 00:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC) Every Wikipedia...

(UTC) Fma12, you're not required to deal with anyone (WP:DISENGAGE, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and in case someone persistently messages you after a request not to...

people refrain from editing. The first is clearly their right per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, and for the second nobody is under any obligation to follow Tamzin's...

January 2024 (UTC) You have not offered a compromise, and it is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY for me to edit the article Law of India. I intend to withdraw from this...

a Wikipedia:Wikibreak from AFD. Just a reminder that AFD work is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY and there are other solid editors active at AFD. If a topic is truly...

idea, turn around and demand they do the rest of the work? Do read WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, please, and when you've done so, please decide whether you want to...

Dicklyon (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC) There's WP:SILENCE (and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY), but at the same time, I think there's enough of a quorum here where...

just to find out it's all being scrapped... but alas, that's why WP:NOTCOMPULSORY I think elements of all of these articles could be incorporated elsewhere...

to make demands on how other volunteers should spend their time (WP:NOTCOMPULSORY)? 192.76.8.86 (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Comment x2 As there appears...

mean that, nothing prevents it. Nothing could prevent it because WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is both policy and a fundamental truth of human existence. I'm not sure...

anything. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 03:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, so even a "non-retired" editor might never edit again. And if someone...

cases. BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Per WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, I am tired of working on this page today. I will refrain unless I am...

(talk) 07:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC) While that may be an essay, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is a policy: Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require...

taken away. The bottom line is that making edits to Wikipedia is WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. No-one is not entitled to demand that I make edits in the draftspace...

04:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Wikipedia is a volunteer service and WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. I have other WP:OBLIGATION in real life. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 08:40...

alleged profane quote), then the next source is his death. I know WP:NOTCOMPULSORY but I haven't a clue why somebody would suggest an article as bad as...

But if you don't improve the article - who will?: Per the policy WP:NOTCOMPULSORY: Wikipedia is a volunteer community and does not require Wikipedians...

behavior unless it descends into tendentious axe grinding. After all, WP:NOTCOMPULSORY is a section of our very important policy WP:NOT, which says Editors...

time that their action can be challenged. It's a trivial result of WP:NOTCOMPULSORY, not a counter to the way G5 works. Endorse * Pppery * it has begun...