edit-warring behavior section below. Shortcuts WP:3RRNOWP:3RRNO WP:NOT3RRWP:NOT3RR WP:3RRBLPWP:3RRBLP The following reverts are exempt from the edit-warring...

usual exemptions listed at WP:NOT3RR apply..." will doom this to failure, because he will claim that everything is a NOT3RR exception. If we're going to...

copyright violation. WP:NOT3RR. Discussed at three places. [6] (related to diff [4]) Revert of copyright violation. WP:NOT3RR. Discussed at three places...

(UTC) While Doniago did revert four times in a 24 hour period, I believe WP:NOT3RR is applicable here. The reference for the salary claims is sourcing its...

September 2022‎ obvious BLP Violations were removed hence it is not WP:NOT3RR. I have not violated the 3 revert rule and I am discussing all the disputes...

seasoned admin). The content I reverted clearly meets exeption 7 of WP:NOT3RR, as the wording has been shown to be patently false, biased, unsourced,...

WP:BANREVERT, WP:EVADE, and WP:Edit warring (and the repeat there at WP:NOT3RR) and nobody would take your editing warring charge seriously. So that again...

the content. —Hahc21 21:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Not edit warring when WP:NOT3RR is involved. SplashScreen (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Please read:...

1 October 2014 (UTC) Hi, I would suggest that this would fall under WP:NOT3RR where it states that when in doubt, do not revert and use the dispute resolution...

@Asilvering: It is not edit warring because reverting socks is allowed per WP:NOT3RR, and this is an abusive LTA. You clearly haven't checked the evidence. Look...

used to WP:EVADE are considered to be an exception to 3RR per item 3 of WP:NOT3RR. Moreover, Cleatcoma1's comment about Coltsfan being helped by his admin...

clear vandalism, then that's not even an IAR issue - it's covered by WP:NOT3RR, and the long-term editor is not in the wrong. However, I would advise them...

friendly advice: don't do that. Jsharpminor (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC) WP:NOT3RR: "The following actions are not counted as reverts for the purposes of 3RR:...

against several other users that has been restoring the content, he claimed NOT3RR as defense. The main goal here is to reach a solution to this edit war spanning...

linked without marking it as a quotation - which might possibly make WP:NOT3RR relevant here. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC) again I am...

removal of BPL issues are exempted from the three revert rule (see: WP:NOT3RR), it would probably be better for you to discuss with the user and the administrators...

a Wiki-senetor mo. Is WP:NOT3RR except. Avono (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Avono Of course and per Wikipedia:NOT3RR you can also edit war over...

User:Ekdalian that his own reverts don't qualify for exemption under WP:NOT3RR, even if the other party sems to be violating common sense. In such cases...

the file and its corresponding non-free use rationale is allowed per WP:NOT3RR since the file's usage was discussed and the close was to remove it from...

Kthxbay. Sock is clearly visible by these two edits: [154][155] See WP:NOT3RR. Shankargb (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Why are you fighting me. I just...

and based on common sense, was clearly a sock and I made a 3-revert under NOT3RR. The sheer volume of PR agency socks active in this entry precludes an investigation...

vandalism, nor has Andrzejbanas made any attempt to report them as such. WP:NOT3RR states that the 3RR exemption applies to, "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits...

9 August 2016 (UTC) Reverting block evasion technically falls under WP:NOT3RR, but he really needs to start reporting obvious socks to WP:AIV and WP:SPI...

sufficiently aware of 3RR to have filled a report. AlanS (talk) Sorry no, see WP:NOT3RR "Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned...

example 7 of WP:NOT3RR and WP:BRD. You gotta do better than that." 15:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC) "(Reverting as per example 7 of WP:NOT3RR and WP:BRD) No...

revision 813522987 by Pengortm (talk)" 21:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC) "WP:NOT3RR" 21:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC) "Per WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE, Onus is on the...

Smallbones vehemently asserts that his 25-ish reverts are protected by WP:NOT3RR, however this assertion has been challenged by myself and numerous others...

I'm not certain that the vandalism is as obvious as is required at WP:NOT3RR, but I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I suggest you continue...

warring with Mamalugo and JorgePeixoto at article claiming exemption under WP:NOT3RR for BLP. I am uninvolved. However the source supports the content she is...

made by 124.176.237.176 do not constitute obvious vandalism as noted in WP:NOT3RR. Inspection of prior 90.201.91.232 edit summaries show a history of uncivil...

me like the reversions by NYyankees51 and MarnetteD would fall under WP:NOT3RR because the article is under the WP:BLP umbrella. As such, it falls to the...

exemption applied once the name of the alleged gunman was removed. As WP:NOT3RR says "Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this...

September 2012 (UTC) I was, of course, claiming an exception to 3RR per WP:NOT3RR #7: Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious...

that administrator should reconsider enforcement. By provision 4 of WP:NOT3RR, we can revert obvious vandalism. User:Dlsqor edited against vandal User:6675548...

cut cases of vandalism, copyright infringement, and defamation (see WP:NOT3RR), none of which was the case in this instance. I also believe, since you've...

ignoration of discussion was a clear vandalism, hence exception of 3RR (WP:NOT3RR) It is also mentioned above. The second one is also sourced, first diff...

Adding the tweet may appear stupid but removing it may not be excused by WP:NOT3RR. EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC) Page : Ganga in Hinduism (edit...

not allowed in that article (which is not considered a revert as per WP:NOT3RR rules #1 and #5) for the official free-use one. I made two reverts regarding...

issues are not always seen as a clear exemption to 3RR per item 5 of WP:NOT3RR. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Eh. I've used that exemption...

already been warned by @bilcat about personal attacks. I suggest you read WP:NOT3RR which names reversing of vandalism as an exception to the 3 Revert Rule...

2015 (UTC) Reverting blankings are exempt from 3RR enforcement, see WP:NOT3RR. --AmaryllisGardener talk 21:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC) Agreed didnt report...

sources policy works on Wikipedia. I also advise User:Askelaadden to read WP:NOT3RR since their reverts are not excused under that rule. EdJohnston (talk) 02:26...

EdJohnston pointed out on my talkpage, that is not one of the exceptions in WP:NOT3RR, and I was wrong. On a sidenote, I think that undoing an edit that is technically...

article's status quo would not meet the "obvious vandalism" exemption of WP:NOT3RR. --McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC) I'd add that DNRC is also...

127.214 (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Uncontroversial vandalism. WP:NOT3RR clpo13(talk) 08:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Dan56 is removing cited material...

block evasion activity on Eastern European articles that I took it to be WP:NOT3RR as the content was introduced by Théophile de Viau, an WP:SPA with only...

unexplained page blanking. As such, I think my reverts follow exemption #4 of NOT3RR. Still, I'll try to be more cautious in the future to make sure that warnings...

if this were true, it does not grant you an exemption from 3RR. See WP:NOT3RR for the valid exemptions. There is no substitute for having a full discussion...

merely suggest they perhaps misunderstand WP:EDITCONSENSUS and what is WP:NOT3RR. Cheers, O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 03:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC) My...

there may be a language barrier confounding the situation. As a note: WP:NOT3RR on my account due to the copy-vio issue. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:59...

Baranof and I may be approaching 3RR, but we are clearly falling into the WP:NOT3RR WP:BLP exception. Salix is repeatedly inserting information claiming open...

them. The Lady Catherine de Burgh (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC) WP:NOT3RR is pretty clear What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider...

reverts on BLPs are sometimes exempt from 3RR (and I have pointed you to WP:NOT3RR already, but it looks like you've ignored it entirely). Many of the actual...

important to state I was operating under what I understand to be the WP:NOT3RR exemption for "[r]emoving violations of the biographies of living persons...

re-removed Reagan, you left Regnery. It is still a revert. Please see WP:NOT3RR. None of your claims for exemption are valid. You violated 3RR: consider...

reverting to protect BLP seems implausible. The BLP exception (item #7 at WP:NOT3RR) is intended to exclude really scandalous material and not to prevent plausible...

I've probably got a block coming too; I misremembered the BLP clause on WP:NOT3RR as applying to all of WP:BLP, not just contentious material, and had thought...

dog in this fight, but as far as I can tell, it does not fall under WP:NOT3RR point 7, which is intended for the removal of clear BLP violations. Newimpartial...

there is ongoing discussion about the file's non-free use does not mean WP:NOT3RR is in effect. Looking at the edit history of the article, it appears that...

violation, but MEDRS is not one of the exemptions from edit warring per WP:NOT3RR, I'll add a comment to my previous listing of that edit by Zefr for consideration...

did, however what you are claiming is not listed as an exception in WP:NOT3RR and you made no attempts to resolve the issue on the WP:DISPUTE and didn't...

that could be a sign you aren't trying very hard to reach agreement. WP:NOT3RR does not make any allowance for edits intended to maintain the 'status quo'...

only threats. The ugly part here is that users are given leeway (see WP:NOT3RR) when they breach 3RR for the purpose of reverting vandalism and other forms...

undo my edits. Contents of the edits are irrelevant as unless stated in WP:NOT3RR, and you have not stated which exemption your edits fall under. My "accusations"...

violation BilCat is not violating 3RR. One of the exemptions outlined at WP:NOT3RR is "Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban...

Comments: Reverting obvious vandalism [137][138] (by a clear sock) is WP:NOT3RR Plus there is more to See User_talk:DBigXray#Happy_with_revert...

Removing inappropriately added non-free files is listed as an exception WP:NOT3RR and it does appear that Hullaballoo Wolfowitz was at least trying to follow...

part of the status quo, and that's why he is warring to put it back. WP:NOT3RR does not excuse reverts made to defend the status quo, whatever you may...

violation. Reverting vandalism by a sock of User:PavelStaykov falls under WP:NOT3RR. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC) Page Bordeaux–Mérignac Airport (edit...

prveviously removed blp vio" - in this revert Lacy seems to be invoking WP:NOT3RR, however, that shouldn't apply - the article was written by the editor of...

that should I point out that the following actions are listed under WP:NOT3RR: "Reverting edits to pages in your own user space, so long as you are respecting...

notify the attending admin again.) If this is correct, per WP:EVADE and WP:NOT3RR, anyone can revert him indiscriminately. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk)...

page) is exempt from 3RR (as long as it violates the TP guidlines). See WP:NOT3RR. So when you ignored my repeated requests to stay off my talk page and posted...

and now that you have read WP:DENY and that you are going to observe WP:NOT3RR §3 in the future. Otherwise this needs to start a desysopping. Andy Dingley...

broken. Yes, there are some folks who say that I've edit warred, despite WP:NOT3RR and Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules - "Reverting edits by banned...

Furthermore, the second cited revert would quite possibly fall under WP:NOT3RR(7) as it makes the assertion that a BLP is a "Zionist historian" - this...

most likely be considered and exception to the three-revert rule per WP:NOT3RR; at some point, though, it might simply be better to seek assistance from...

06:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC) dusti - 4th revert was an exception under wp:NOT3RR for removal of WP:redflag pre-litigation material. Looking back at the policy...

blocked editors, and blocked and banned editors are treated equally by WP:NOT3RR NE Ent 03:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Perhaps it's now time to just simply...

content disputes, since they are not supposed to be editing at all, so WP:NOT3RR applies. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Sure, the question is whether...

terms of action to take, but I also think John was WP:INVOLVED here as WP:NOT3RR states "What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial." Since the...

is NOT policy. It is a guideline. This is an important distinction. WP:NOT3RR contains an exemption for blatant violations of NFCC policy, not guideline...

have to plan on being here 24 hours from now. Am I mistaken, or doesn't WP:NOT3RR definitely apply here? Is blanking sources without an edit summary ever...

definitely not vandalism. They might be sock of someone (which also provides WP:NOT3RR benefits, but, I was trying to understand their arguments! --Tito Dutta...

It doesn't matter who else is edit warring, unless it's covered by WP:NOT3RR then stop reverting so much. Even if it is covered by an exemption, most...

puppet. This made me revert more. Then, I hesitated. The third point of WP:NOT3RR was about reverting LTAs, but how productive, really, was reverting edits...

unambiguous corrections of WP:NFCC#3b violations and thus seemingly covered by WP:NOT3RR. At File:Brooks Robinson Plaza.png, he has readded a template saying that...

vandalism and do not count as edit warring as they are not reverts per WP:NOT3RR for reverting obvious vandalism. There's no question hounding was occurring...

of Muslims in various parts of Canada. Your reverts do not fall under WP:NOT3RR(4) of reverts of obvious vandalism. The edit warring is manifest.--Eostrix...

still applicable. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 20:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC) See WP:NOT3RR. --John (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC) What counts as exempt under BLP...

on a single article. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC) WP:NOT3RR: "3. Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned...

(UTC) Furthermore Vlad did not claim an 3RR exemption on talk violating WP:NOT3RR. There was clear doubt about copyright issue claims and he should not have...

blatant trolling. (I'll note that I reverted the IP repeatedly under WP:NOT3RR, seeing as their edits, at least in my eyes, seemed to be obvious vandalism...

 — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Just so we're clear, WP:NOT3RR applies, right? Ian.thomson (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Yes.  — Berean...

Yes, I reverted edits from an IP just recently and a few today. Per WP:NOT3RR, I am exempt from engaging in 3RR because the user was evading blocks by...

and I'm not sure that what you were reverting would have come under WP:NOT3RR. This is not a criticism, just a suggestion to be mindful, and reach for...

Kautilya3 then used diffs of my reverts of removal of copyright violation ( WP:NOT3RR) to file a false Edit warring case against me for sniping me) Violating...

introduced into the article. [76] [77] 4 reverts by me in that case were WP:NOT3RR for removing the Copyright violation, that CapnJackSp was adding into the...

claiming that material must be restored to an article because of WP:BLP. WP:NOT3RR#EX7 does not afford any such 1RR exemption. In addition to edit warring...

that investigation to conclude before judging the 1RR violation, under WP:NOT3RR. Diffs 2 and 3, while not CIVIL, well, given gaming. 4 doesn't seem to be...

that being wikilawyered to death. You'd have to also amend things like WP:NOT3RR for it to be of any effectiveness. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)...

automatic exemption for sockpuppetry, BLP, copyright, illegal content (WP:NOT3RR). There's no need to mention it specifically here. NW (Talk) 21:05, 14 July...

13:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC) There isn't a specific exemption for it in WP:NOT3RR... it's not exactly vandalism. That said, you could probably ignore all...

the content. —Hahc21 21:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Not edit warring when WP:NOT3RR is involved. SplashScreen (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Please read:...

(talk) 15:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC) @Ginsuloft: Please take a look at WP:NOT3RR, especially item 4. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)...

understands what is going on (BTW, Q10 BLP is an explicit exception at WP:NOT3RR). He is a solid candidate. I looked at the challenged CSD tags above, and...

is possible without being vandalism), then the admin is exempt under WP:NOT3RR. I'm assuming from your description that the IP was warned at some point...

the content. —Hahc21 21:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Not edit warring when WP:NOT3RR is involved. SplashScreen (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Please read:...

vandalism (must be indisputable) is exempt from the three revert rule; see WP:NOT3RR. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 14:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC) Has this draft been...

Maddie), he was reverting pretty obvious vandalism (which is covered under WP:NOT3RR), so that is a non-issue. Administrators are free to take a break at any...

warranty??? KamelTebaast 19:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC) @Kamel Tebaast: WP:NOT3RR states the exceptions to WP:3RR, which includes removing copyrighted material...

August 2021 (UTC) What a bizarre response. 1. I didn't break anything. WP:NOT3RR clearly exempt reverts of sockpuppets. 2. You've changed the title so that...

blocked sock who disrupted this page earlier. I am going to revert you per WP:NOT3RR until the page is protected from your disruption. Fuzheado will agree with...

obvious vandalism), so I'm reporting the issue here as suggested by WP:NOT3RR. I hope somebody can help. Sideways713 (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2015 (UTC)...

argument is not with other editors, but with the WP:BLPREMOVE rule (and WP:NOT3RR) itself. It was also pointed out to Novaseminary, that if he was really...

Exhibit D, Exhibit E, Exhibit F, Exhibit G, Exhibit H, and Exhibit I). Per WP:NOT3RR, I have reverted back to the previous version, but they continue to reinsert...

certain. Uhtregorn (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Hi Uhtregorn. See WP:NOT3RR for a list of the exemptions from the rule. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit...

rule. (Vandalism is a listed exception to the 3-revert rule.)". Per WP:NOT3RR, this is an exemption: "Removing contentious material that is libelous,...

even more nonsensical changes ([4] [5] [6] [7] [8]). While we do have WP:NOT3RR#EX7, I am trying to not keep reverting them, so I really don't know what...

feeling is that an unsourced claim of a BLP's death falls squarely within WP:NOT3RR, but nevertheless I'd appreciate it if some others could watch the article...

holding a grudge. Dsaun100 (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC) Per WP:NOT3RR, "Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious...

action is required on that. If they keep it up they will reach 4RR. (Per WP:NOT3RR, edits that remove unsourced contentious material that violates WP:BLP are...

properly no further reverts are to be made by User:Solicitr. If there is an WP:NOT3RR exemption that can be applied to this situation please quote the applicable...

Wikipedia experience]. In your little whine above, you presume to invoke NOT3RR for something that was only 2RR because you had started yourself to edit-war...

edit warring rules. (The only exemptions from the policy are listed at WP:NOT3RR). You broke the 3RR with this edit. There may still be time for you to avoid...

sure it belongs there, but I immediately took note of it. On 3RR I see WP:NOT3RR: "7. Removing contentious material that is libelous [..]". In my timezone...

Recall that fixing WP:UNDUE weight does not grant you an exemption under WP:NOT3RR. This actress is surely not defamed by mention of her Erdos number, whether...

reverted[82][83] and messaged the user on their user talk.[84][85] Does WP:NOT3RR apply here? ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 21:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC) "When...

Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Some of these are ancient and fall into WP:NOT3RR, which is why I was unblocked on a few occasions. These include the JohnClarknew...

--2800:484:738A:43F0:6A6:1713:2923:648C (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC) Per WP:NOT3RR, reverts were due to block evasion by JeanCastì Barry Wom (talk) 15:35,...

(which would be understandable). If there are any reverts that were WP:NOT3RR on here (such as undoing vandalism), please let me know and I will be happy...

policy. This action does not fall under any of the exemptions listed in WP:NOT3RR. King Ayan Das (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC) Blocked – for a period of...

(UTC) @SarekOfVulcan I probably would have warned Umby per item 7 of WP:NOT3RR, giving them the benefit of the doubt as to unfamiliarity with that exception...

WP:NOT-FOR-GETTING-OTHER-PEOPLE-TO-DO-YOUR-HOMEWORK WP:NOT/OUT WP:NOT1E WP:NOT2 WP:NOT3RR WP:NOT42 WP:NOTA11 WP:NOTA2 WP:NOTA7 WP:NOTA9 WP:NOTABLECASE WP:NOTABLECASES...

own edit? WikiwriterM (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Yes. See WP:NOT3RR for the full list of exemptions to the three-revert rule. '''[[User:CanonNi]]'''...

editor feels might be a BLP violation is considered a valid exemption per WP:NOT3RR, an exemption which I see Mmccaea claimed in multiple edit summaries. Bakhtar40...

―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) For reference, WP:NOT3RR cites several exemptions to the general policy against edit warring, one...

Therefore they cannot use the argument that these were exempt from 1RR under WP:NOT3RR. As full disclosure, the second set of edits includes edits of an editor...