it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:LLMWP:LLM WP:NEWLLMWP:NEWLLM WP:NOLLMWP:NOLLM...

confronted with the WP:NOLLM guideline is some variation of the following: Thank you for your concern. However, please understand that WP:NOLLM is a guideline...

Gurkubondinn as a NOLLM violation, then moved back to mainspace by its creator (with an AI generated edit summary). Probable NOLLM violation, dubious...

[[WP:NOLLM]] cleanup, see [[WP:AINB#User:TheRealBasti]]. To reinstate changes, [[WP:LLMPRVOBJ]] should be followed. [[WP:NOLLM]], see...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM Generated. WP:NOLLM applies, as does WP:DRAFTOBJECT since this is a disputed draftification...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

as AI generated, then moved back to mainspace by its creator. Probable NOLLM vio, dubious notability. Athanelar (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2026 (UTC) Note:...

the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...

Relevant report and discussion are viewable on the talk page. [[WP:NOLLM]] cleanup, see [[WP:AINB#User:MaduraiSelvam]] Each individual row below tracks...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is almost certainly LLM-generated, and fails WP:NOLLM. Most of the references are either WP:NEWSORGINDIA or just links to the...

Basketball, and Algeria. JTtheOG (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Obvious...

information that is not in them, the most likely explanation for which is WP:NOLLM violation. For example, neither of the first two refs is meaningfully about...

03:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 07:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, nollm. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2026...

in solidarity, Chloe (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. This seems to be an LLM translation of an LLM-generated text: Diff/1342571834...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

otherwise) as failing NOLLM, Reywas92's analysis is sound and I agree with it. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. sources do not...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

GrinningIodize (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Apparent violation of WP:NOLLM; strong indications of AI writing ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 20:36, 20...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

01:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom, and as likely failing WP:NOLLM. Some of the more glaring AISIGNS are WP:AIATTR, WP:AIREDCAT, WP:AILEGACY...

20:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete with no reservations, for failing NOLLM. No quarters for robot text, put it in the bin and keep it there. No comment...

the subject, only that the article itself is LLM generated and fails the NOLLM guideline. The Rod Chapman generation was clearly copied from a chatbot:...

April 2026 (UTC) +1 Harryb7 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Draft It's possible...

Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 18:12, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, also fails NOLLM and NBIO. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:27, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per reasons above...

Blue-Sonnet (I'm listening) 13:51, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, WP:NBIO and GNG. Blue Sonnet has basically said everything I wanted to...

(talk) 01:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. It is a violation of WP:NOLLM. Phrases like "The Finnish public broadcaster Yle described the round as"...

"eyeballing"). --gurkubondinn 10:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user has gone right back to submitting more AI-generated material and...

Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as not meeting the WP:NOLLM guideline. The article was created by an editor that currently lacks the...

Delete per NOLLM. Not sure if this would have survived even without the use of an LLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. RossEvans19...

7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: High suspicion that this article violates WP:NOLLM. I personally couldn't find any evidence that this article meets WP:N.「NuggFrog」...

your chatbot may have interpreted this, the nomination is for failing WP:NOLLM and has nothing to do with notability or lack thereof. Also, please only...

just make sure you follow the relevant policies, WP:NOLLM and WP:CLOP. Those are really important. NOLLM says that you have to be very careful with ChatGPT;...

still violate WP:NOLLM, a la WP:YESPROMO WP:Yes, you have to follow NOLLM – being a "guideline" and not a "policy" does not make WP:NOLLM optional Humorous...

discussions. The latter summary seems to predate English Wikipedia's WP:NOLLM policy, instituted in March 2026, which now outright prohibits some kinds...

‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect, the current article fails WP:NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

in mainspace. Paprikaiser (talk) 19:45, 25 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM -- this user has pumped out several of these articles, sometimes minutes...

10:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per a sound nomination rationale. Per WP:NOLLM, translated content that did not follow the LLM-assisted translation policy...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Looks like it's AI-generated and thus in breach of WP:NOLLM. The main reason for this is the nonsensical citations - e.g. ref 3 is supposed...

Wikipedia's policies. Rajugiri23 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOLLM violation. In Special:Permalink/1363161728, I see the following signs of...

(talk) 00:19, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Delete (or draftify) – Appears to violate WP:NOLLM. Difficult to give the benefit of the doubt here. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk)...

deletion) on a topic with no apparent notability, thus failing WP:GNG and WP:NOLLM. The article itself is full of social activism jargon and the sources are...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

- it wasn't released as a single and didn't chart. I'm also getting WP:NOLLM vibes from the writing, which seems to do its damnedest to emphasize the...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

article or at least wikilinks are done with the help of AI, which violates WP:NOLLM." ~2026-26910-86 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Here2rewrite (talk) 22:35...

Humbug! 06:18, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Delete Likely AI-generated list (fails WP:NOLLM) that is sourced entirely to non-independent sources (the schools themselves)...

modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...

modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is AI-generated and fails WP:NOLLM, see for example WP:AIBOLD and WP:MARKDOWN in previous revisions (and in...

LLM. M kuhner (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Delete pure puffery, per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete It may become notable...

2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. In addition this looks AI-generated (see WP:NOLLM) and lots of sources are spam link to sites selling crypto stuff. Lijil...

AI-generated articles. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:48, 19 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user also created Draft:Battle of Şcheia (1486) in article space, which...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:09, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM; see my response to cyclopia above. —Em-as-in-emily (talk) 18:50, 13 May...

policies and guidelines, including those specific to AI use such as WP:NOLLM. An approved request for bot approval is required by policy for (almost)...

nom and WP:NEWLLM. मल्ल (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM and per nom. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...

AI-generated, as well as the comments above. In the spirits of WP:AITALK and WP:NOLLM, I have collapsed those comments, and kindly request that you express your...

guideline. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM (article is less than a week old) and obvious AI tells. And yes, the sources...

lists, citing sources for information that's not in them, in general a WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

to be added. Nocturnal781 (talk) 00:16, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOLLM violation. If nothing else, you'd think that the user who created the article...

(talk) 06:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, because this also likely fails WP:NOLLM. The user has been inserting text wrapped in markdown codeblocks in DIff/1361215034...

notability. 🄻🄰 15:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per oaicites being a clear WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 15:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete. Even without the...

Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Bearian...

middle-school class report than a Wikipedia article. Should be deleted per WP:NOLLM. I will admit there is potential for an article on this topic, but this...

keep the stubification. The subject is notable, but it needs to pass the NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect to National...

of every source and claim, and thus should be deleted per WP:TNT and WP:NOLLM, with no prejudice against a human-written article on this topic in the...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:ESSAY and WP:NOLLM all in one. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Comment Another...

autoconfirmed. Draft created also appears to be wholly LLM generated - NOLLM was a flag issue with articles created by this sockmaster. Netstars22 (talk...

given the apparent COI. If so, I think this deletion would fall under WP:NOLLM. The only way this would not be LLM output is if the author of the article...

the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...

discussions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:25, 2 July 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. Or speedily delete under WP:G15, the Nasnews source does not exist, and...

this one. PA Uploader (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Delete - for WP:NOLLM, WP:NPOL and not meeting WP:GNG. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2026...

packets, but others don't. The title case is also a dead giveaway. Fails WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Could probably have...

output of an LLM, the Legacy section particularly so. As such, violates WP:NOLLM. I suggest deletion, then redirect to Golden_generation#Netherlands_(1972–1978...

discussions. MrOllie (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:NOLLM. Even if it were notable, it would be best to apply WP:TNT. JTtheOG (talk)...

Accesscrawl (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom and for failing NOLLM. Sentences like international coverage of India's AI sector highlighted...

--Griboski (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Speedily delete for failing WP:NOLLM and WP:V. Created with WP:AILIST, WP:MARKDOWN, em-dashes, and invalid Template:Featured...

done. Jumpytoo Talk 02:28, 17 May 2026 (UTC) Delete because it fails WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMT. You must read all of the sources that you cite, full stop....

likely. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM, I'm not sure about salting yet. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2026...

notable. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, and per what Asukite said. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. --Gurkubondinn 01:57, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete yet another belated vindication...

2026 (UTC) Also, please don't use LLMs to write talk page comments. See WP:NOLLM. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Please stop...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

ways the original sources did not. For these reasons, as outlined in WP:NOLLM, using large language models to generate or rewrite article content is not...

notability. I opened this AfD purely because the current article itself is a WP:NOLLM violation, not because of the subject of the article. Since it needs a TNT...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potential violation of WP:NOLLM. Author disclosed LLM generation in initial page creation: WP:LLM disclosure:...

28 July 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete under G15, this most likely fails WP:NOLLM. References nr. 2, nr. 3 and nr. 4 in Diff/1366506722 return 404 not found...

effort is made. SenshiSun (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. Enough said. --Gurkubondinn 01:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Creator has...

contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM, oppose merging because that would also fail NOLLM. No comment on notability, but the currently existing...

by an undisclosed paid editor and likely AI-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM. I declined G15 given the current version of the article doesn't contain...

12 July 2026 (UTC) LLM text is not permitted on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:NOLLM) and has to be removed when found. We could move the article to a draft...

models' tendency to hallucinate, and is therefore largely prohibited by WP:NOLLM. AI cleanup is typically done at the AI noticeboard (AINB), but is carried...

beginning in February of this year. If there is a better example of why WP:NOLLM is needed, I haven't seen it. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2026 (UTC)...

Diff/1362885210 had not been removed then I would have said that this fails the WP:NOLLM guideline as well. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: Kingsherpa...

such as "underscores" and "widely recognized". So basically delete per WP:NOLLM. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 08:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Note:...

Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM. No comment on notability of the subject. ‑‑gurkubondinn 08:37, 30 June...

Geschichte (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, being CV-cruft, GNG, ANYBIO, and all of the above. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:29...

but the main page (www.newsday.co.zw) appears to load fine. This fails WP:NOLLM should be deleted. --gurkubondinn 09:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

Intellectuals, did not [18]. Fuzheado responded to the AINB case with: the new NOLLM page is a guideline and not firm policy. As such, we should have latitude...

modification. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM after the expansion in Diff/1293050933 (the user's talk page is rather colourful)...

discussions. --gurkubondinn 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, which is easily observed in the contribution history and talk page of the...

others. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing NOLLM, being created unreasonably fast. Nobody writes with such a different level...

clearly disclosed as failing NOLLM, that would be a different thing. But it wasn't, and not all of them are disclosed to be NOLLM failures. The ones that have...

the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...

otherwise limited to text which otherwise broke policy/guidelines. The NOLLM guideline was explicitly extended to cover all AI generated text in the...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM, according to the author’s disclosure on the talk page. The author is experienced...

Balabush (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a clearly failing WP:NOLLM, making this a complete nonstarter before even considering notability, which...

recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

least this article should be stubified. But I would prefer delete as per WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

subcultures), but the current article is LLM-generated which violates WP:NOLLM. Furthermore, a few of the listed aesthetics here appear to be hallucinated...

‑‑gurkubondinn 18:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, this also seems to fail NOLLM in addition to what the nom said. One of the references in the initial revision...

the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...

generate or rewrite article content is prohibited for most purposes. See WP:NOLLM for more information. Please do not remove the maintenance template until...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

Dreamyshade (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC) we have WP:LLMRESP which I added to NOLLM with this in mind, I think expanding that essay to serve as that would be...

recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...

couple of sentences, but to rewrite the whole thing from scratch, because WP:NOLLM prohibits you from writing such a draft in the first place. It still looks...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. See Diff/1358512204. AlferedNobel (talk ·...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...

recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...

anyone may have had. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:50, 9 July 2026 (UTC) I removed the nollm tag from the article, but with no prejudice toward an uninvolved admin closing...

cohesive if you don't read it too closely. TL;DR: Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:NOLLM although I can't prove the latter. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2026...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, the user seems to admit to as much in recent edit summaries. The page history...

though these are not independent and thus would not establish notability. WP:NOLLM: The articles look AI-generated and the editor who created them has already...

original draft was likely written with AI. This is indeed contrary to WP:NOLLM. Where I lose you is the conclusion that it must therefore be deleted. We...

recent edit was about a week ago. They've been warned twice for AI since WP:NOLLM took effect, and didn't answer either time. So that's why we're here now...

Another AI-generated "X in Y" article (or in this case, "X and Y"). Fails WP:NOLLM and WP:ESSAY, likely containing WP:OR as well. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:26...

those articles can be reassessed in light of WP:GNG without concern for WP:NOLLM. -- LWG talk (VOPOV) 22:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks so much! Do you know...

an admin, I would limit the use of AI by following the guidelines of WP:NOLLM and not use AI, especially LLMs, for making content-related additions to...

meatpuppetry. @Socratis1357, please don't use AI on Wikipedia in future — see WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMS for more on this. This SPI report appears to have been created...

Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Kindly check the history...

Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. Test Article cleanup list 12 open · 23 total...

Dreamyshade (talk) 04:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC) we have WP:LLMRESP which I added to NOLLM with this in mind, I think expanding that essay to serve as that would be...

edits, claimed that WP: NOLLM prohibits unreviewed AI-generated and then incorrectly quoted NOLLM at me: From what I read in WP: NOLLM, "editors must not add...

editor, had been disclosing AI but didn't respond to being made aware of NOLLM. Worth checking it they're still using it, most recent edit is 2 July. Cleanup...

draftspace to mainspace. They are still subject to the restrictions found in WP:NOLLM and are reminded that they are not to use LLMs to create or rewrite articles...

write or edit text for Wikipedia is not allowed, neither in articles WP:NOLLM nor in comments WP:LLMCHAT. You need to stop immediately or you are likely...

make mistakes in your writing, but please forget about using any LLM. WP:NOLLM has more guidance for you. Meadowlark (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Yashsurya21 (talk ·...

consequence of how WP:NOLLM has been enacted here. To be clear, I believe this is an institutional problem manifesting through WP:NOLLM, not a problem of...

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 00:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM, but not for failing WP:N. I think that the topic itself probably merits...

Wikidata item) (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as likely failing NOLLM. In addition to all of the AISIGNS already pointed out by GrinningIodize...

Wikipedia:AI noticeboard/Archive 8#KurdishPAL, on 13 May they were made aware of NOLLM and agreed to not use LLMs. There's 23 articles which could be LLMPRODed...

a LLM policy for 3ish years). But everyone I talk to seems to interpret NOLLM as a total ban regardless of PAGs violations Kowal2701 (talk, contribs)...

this nomination is only about the fact that the article itself fails WP:NOLLM. No prejudice against someone writing a new article about the district....

this user? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC) WP:AN/I asking for a WP:NOLLM / WP:COMMUNICATE block is probably the next recourse at this point, we've...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

advice: You cannot use an AI/LLM to generate or rewrite your draft: see WP:NOLLM for more. The first thing you do should be to delete all the parts of your...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:32, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. I don't see anything wrong with someone asking to have an horrendous AI-slopicles...

you are not yet aware, you must not do that in your draft: please see WP:NOLLM for more. Using AI/LLMs to converse with other editors is permitted, but...

(UTC) @BD2412, WP:NOLLM allows copyediting one's own edits with an LLM. It disallows copyediting articles for the reason stated at NOLLM, see Wikipedia:AI...

the task you're attempting is nearly impossible. Further, please see WP:NOLLM. It seems from the comment you left on the draft that you're using AI in...

use LLMs; it's likely to be seen as undercutting your argument. See WP:NOLLM. I don't think it is ever right to print these kinds of numbers without...

Editor has acknowledged AI/LLM use, committed to stop, and will follow WP:NOLLM. Cleanup may still be needed. Thank you for working to understand the rules...

Wikipedia:Help, I've been accused of AI! Wikipedia:Yes, you have to follow NOLLM Wikipedia:Yes, that does violate the AI guidelines Some of the search results...

positively; for example instead of banning the usage completely (but WP:NOLLM should stand; it's better if humans write the articles themselves but they...

that according to Gurkubondinn violate WP:NOLLM, while asserting that those uses did not violate WP:NOLLM: Talk:2026 Banana Ball Championship League...

around as a redirect to WP:NOLLM will confuse users NicheSports (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Weak Retarget to WP:NOLLM. Yes, there's nothing specific...

which could indicate whether an editor’s submissions may have violated WP:NOLLM and whether further review is needed elsewhere. I personally plan to use...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

22:43, 10 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:21, 11 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. same rationale as when I tagged and...

think some people would object to the Requirements section. Imo the reason NOLLM passed was because it was rooted in LLM-use violating PAGs, some may oppose...

notability. I opened this AfD purely because the current article itself is a WP:NOLLM violation, not because of the subject of the article. Since it needs a TNT...

your draft is forbidden, except for a few very narrow ways - please see WP:NOLLM for more information. Meadowlark (talk) 04:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Noted...

packets, but others don't. The title case is also a dead giveaway. Fails WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:23, 20 June 2026 (UTC) Delete Could probably have...

continue trying to work on this draft, you do not use an AI/LLM. See WP:NOLLM for more information. Meadowlark (talk) 05:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Heavywick (talk ·...

it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:LLMWP:LLM WP:NEWLLMWP:NEWLLM WP:NOLLMWP:NOLLM...

This is an essay on the WP:NOLLM guideline. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia...

this nomination is only about the fact that the article itself fails WP:NOLLM. No prejudice against someone writing a new article about the district....

otherwise) as failing NOLLM, Reywas92's analysis is sound and I agree with it. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. sources do not...

artificial "intelligence" software on Wikipedia. linked pages {{User:UBX/NoLLM}} This user opposes the use of large language models. linked pages...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

userspace essays. Alternatively we add a whole bunch of extra text to WP:NOLLM explaining the same, but I'm not sure if that would be popular given how...

that according to Gurkubondinn violate WP:NOLLM, while asserting that those uses did not violate WP:NOLLM: Talk:2026 Banana Ball Championship League...

July 2026 (UTC) Are you aware of Wikipedia's policy regarding LLM's (WP:NOLLM)? Your replies here as well as on your talk page seem to be generated by...

If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache. Re NOLLM, I started the discussion and draft but didn’t really make it, I probably...

this way and we put them up for AfD and let the community decide whether NOLLM should apply or whether the articles are of sufficient quality that we should...

(talk) 01:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. It is a violation of WP:NOLLM. Phrases like "The Finnish public broadcaster Yle described the round as"...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, the user seems to admit to as much in recent edit summaries. The page history...

cohesive if you don't read it too closely. TL;DR: Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:NOLLM although I can't prove the latter. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2026...

notability. 🄻🄰 15:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per oaicites being a clear WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 15:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Delete. Even without the...

sources), I believe the article was eligible for G15 and violated the WP:NOLLM guideline. Toadspike [Talk] 23:38, 3 May 2026 (UTC) From my reading of WP:G15...

contribs) 17:18, 28 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM, oppose merging because that would also fail NOLLM. No comment on notability, but the currently existing...

recent edits to this article are LLM, please revert or rewrite them, see WP:NOLLM. M kuhner (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Hi there, the words were my...

(talk) 06:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete, because this also likely fails WP:NOLLM. The user has been inserting text wrapped in markdown codeblocks in DIff/1361215034...

Delete per NOLLM. Not sure if this would have survived even without the use of an LLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM. RossEvans19...

keep the stubification. The subject is notable, but it needs to pass the NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect to National...

middle-school class report than a Wikipedia article. Should be deleted per WP:NOLLM. I will admit there is potential for an article on this topic, but this...

7 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: High suspicion that this article violates WP:NOLLM. I personally couldn't find any evidence that this article meets WP:N.「NuggFrog」...

2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. In addition this looks AI-generated (see WP:NOLLM) and lots of sources are spam link to sites selling crypto stuff. Lijil...

of every source and claim, and thus should be deleted per WP:TNT and WP:NOLLM, with no prejudice against a human-written article on this topic in the...

information that is not in them, the most likely explanation for which is WP:NOLLM violation. For example, neither of the first two refs is meaningfully about...

the subject, only that the article itself is LLM generated and fails the NOLLM guideline. The Rod Chapman generation was clearly copied from a chatbot:...

Basketball, and Algeria. JTtheOG (talk) 20:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Obvious...

others. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing NOLLM, being created unreasonably fast. Nobody writes with such a different level...

given the apparent COI. If so, I think this deletion would fall under WP:NOLLM. The only way this would not be LLM output is if the author of the article...

the prose in this article. Rather than unilaterally draftify this as a NOLLM violation, I thought given the evident effort in its creation it would be...

ways the original sources did not. For these reasons, as outlined in WP:NOLLM, using large language models to generate or rewrite article content is not...

output of an LLM, the Legacy section particularly so. As such, violates WP:NOLLM. I suggest deletion, then redirect to Golden_generation#Netherlands_(1972–1978...

which could indicate whether an editor’s submissions may have violated WP:NOLLM and whether further review is needed elsewhere. I personally plan to use...

01:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per the nom, and as likely failing WP:NOLLM. Some of the more glaring AISIGNS are WP:AIATTR, WP:AIREDCAT, WP:AILEGACY...

effort is made. SenshiSun (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. Enough said. --Gurkubondinn 01:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Delete Creator has...

such as "underscores" and "widely recognized". So basically delete per WP:NOLLM. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 08:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Note:...

03:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 07:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, nollm. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2026...

"eyeballing"). --gurkubondinn 10:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NOLLM. The user has gone right back to submitting more AI-generated material and...

that was deleted after WP:AfD/Elon Musk and South Africa for failing WP:NOLLM? --gurkubondinn 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC) @Gurkubondinn:, it is based on...

reason and because you appeared to use a chatbot to write parts See WP:NOLLM. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2026 (UTC) I want to be clear that...

GrinningIodize (talk) 20:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC) Delete: Apparent violation of WP:NOLLM; strong indications of AI writing ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 20:36, 20...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potential violation of WP:NOLLM. Author disclosed LLM generation in initial page creation: WP:LLM disclosure:...

least this article should be stubified. But I would prefer delete as per WP:NOLLM. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 00:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM, but not for failing WP:N. I think that the topic itself probably merits...

lists, citing sources for information that's not in them, in general a WP:NOLLM violation. ~ A412 talk! 14:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

as well as written article text, seem like AI (in contravention of WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMTALK), and while there could be an innocent explanation, when...

11:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing NCORP, and also failing WP:NOLLM. This is basically a lightly-paraphrased copy of the incontrovertibly LLM-generated...

space to edit WT:NOLLM, but that the user might not have realised that WT:NOLLM was not ECR (only WP:NOLLM is). Their first edit to WT:NOLLM was their 444th...

April 2026) Editor has been warned about the use of AI/LLM content and WP:NOLLM. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC) Same old story: pumps out a...

but the main page (www.newsday.co.zw) appears to load fine. This fails WP:NOLLM should be deleted. --gurkubondinn 09:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

User:ArchiveEditor01 indefinitely blocked and warned multiple times of WP:NOLLM. Nothing left to do here. guninvalid (talk) (the user who was reported)...

original draft was likely written with AI. This is indeed contrary to WP:NOLLM. Where I lose you is the conclusion that it must therefore be deleted. We...

AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM. The user is almost certainly not being honest about their llm use, see...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on...

notable. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, and per what Asukite said. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete...

28 July 2026 (UTC) Speedy delete under G15, this most likely fails WP:NOLLM. References nr. 2, nr. 3 and nr. 4 in Diff/1366506722 return 404 not found...

(talk) 00:19, 9 May 2026 (UTC) Delete (or draftify) – Appears to violate WP:NOLLM. Difficult to give the benefit of the doubt here. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk)...

cleanup, it may pay to have something slightly "smarter". Be wary of WP:NOLLM and avoid modifying the prose this way, but dropping the raw source wikitext...

--Hammersoft (talk) 17:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Oppose: despite having had NOLLM explained to the multiple times, they are still wikilawyering about it and...

article, please be aware that this is not allowed on Wikipedia (see WP:NOLLM). I'm sorry to be discouraging, and will note two positive points: you honorably...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) LLM-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM, according to the author’s disclosure on the talk page. The author is experienced...

likely. Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per NOLLM, I'm not sure about salting yet. Accesscrawl (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2026...

Diff/1362885210 had not been removed then I would have said that this fails the WP:NOLLM guideline as well. ‑‑gurkubondinn 09:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC) Comment: Kingsherpa...

text to connect the sentences on each side, we will indeed run afoul of WP:NOLLM and be at risk of WP:SYNTH. I don't necessarily agree with this particular...

guideline. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOLLM (article is less than a week old) and obvious AI tells. And yes, the sources...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:ESSAY and WP:NOLLM all in one. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Comment Another...

--Griboski (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Speedily delete for failing WP:NOLLM and WP:V. Created with WP:AILIST, WP:MARKDOWN, em-dashes, and invalid Template:Featured...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is AI-generated and fails WP:NOLLM, see for example WP:AIBOLD and WP:MARKDOWN in previous revisions (and in...

those articles can be reassessed in light of WP:GNG without concern for WP:NOLLM. -- LWG talk (VOPOV) 22:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks so much! Do you know...

Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Bearian...

Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 30 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM. No comment on notability of the subject. ‑‑gurkubondinn 08:37, 30 June...

‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) Redirect, the current article fails WP:NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Wikidata item) (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC) Delete as likely failing NOLLM. In addition to all of the AISIGNS already pointed out by GrinningIodize...

nom and WP:NEWLLM. मल्ल (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Delete, fails NOLLM and per nom. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:16, 19 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion...

generated via an LLM. LLM use for copy is prohibited on wikipedia. See WP:NOLLM. It's also forbidden to generate talk page comments. It is impossible to...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:32, 16 June 2026 (UTC) Delete for failing WP:NOLLM. I don't see anything wrong with someone asking to have an horrendous AI-slopicles...

Balabush (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Delete as a clearly failing WP:NOLLM, making this a complete nonstarter before even considering notability, which...

discussions. --gurkubondinn 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC) Delete as failing WP:NOLLM, which is easily observed in the contribution history and talk page of the...

- it wasn't released as a single and didn't chart. I'm also getting WP:NOLLM vibes from the writing, which seems to do its damnedest to emphasize the...

I'm trying to make is that once the LLM text is removed, which post-WP:NOLLM can be boldly done by anyone, there isn't a need to speedy delete anymore...

use LLMs; it's likely to be seen as undercutting your argument. See WP:NOLLM. I don't think it is ever right to print these kinds of numbers without...

article or at least wikilinks are done with the help of AI, which violates WP:NOLLM." ~2026-26910-86 (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Here2rewrite (talk) 22:35...

wary of entering yet another tiring, extended discussion about revising NOLLM, so soon after the last one.) —In solidarity with Wiki Workers United ·...

12 July 2026 (UTC) LLM text is not permitted on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:NOLLM) and has to be removed when found. We could move the article to a draft...

May 2026 (UTC) @Tranngocanhvn: You should read the following first: WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMCHAT. Then, read the summary of our content and behaviour guidelines...

irisChronomia / Talk 15:24, 13 July 2026 (UTC) In addition to WP:DUCK and WP:NOLLM that others have mentioned, I think this person has also violated WP:NOTHERE...

free to steal or adapt. It's a bit obsolete now since I wrote it before WP:NOLLM when attitudes towards AI were a bit more positive. -- LWG talk (VOPOV)...

Speedy delete per WP:G15 (LLM-generated pages without human review) and WP:NOLLM. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC) Kindly check the history...

by an undisclosed paid editor and likely AI-generated in violation of WP:NOLLM. I declined G15 given the current version of the article doesn't contain...

LLM. M kuhner (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC) Delete pure puffery, per NOLLM. Accesscrawl (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Delete It may become notable...

195} ~2026-76101-8 (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2026 (UTC) @19815 Please read WP:NOLLM. You are not allowed to add text generated by a large language model to...

AI-generated, as well as the comments above. In the spirits of WP:AITALK and WP:NOLLM, I have collapsed those comments, and kindly request that you express your...

start again. You cannot use AI/LLMs to generate Wikipedia articles: see WP:NOLLM for more. Presently your draft looks like it's been either written or heavily...

strict limits on use of LLMs on Wikipedia even if carefully managed: see WP:NOLLM. Don't use them to write article text, or to write talk page or noticeboard...

(they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC) oh and see WP:NOLLM nhals8 (rats in the house of the dead) 02:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC) I admitted...

are AI-edited and parts are AI-generated -- which both would violate WP:NOLLM, but just for the record. Going down WP:AISIGNS with what we have: Promotional...

sources wholesale. Courtesy ping: Jako96, since you were the one that left WP:NOLLM warnings on the user's talk page, do you believe that the diff I refer to...

sources), I believe the article was eligible for G15 and violated the WP:NOLLM guideline. Toadspike [Talk] 23:38, 3 May 2026 (UTC) From my reading of WP:G15...

WP:NOTHERE if they are using LLMs for talk page responses, violating WP:NOLLM and not being forthright about its use. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:25, 3 May...

decade are not a matter that needs administrator attention. Please see WP:NOLLM and WP:SOFIXIT. Sorry about your evening, and good luck with cleaning up...