Linking through hyperlinks is an important feature of Wikipedia. Internal links bind the project together into an interconnected whole. Interwikimedia...

the redundant word). "United States" should generally not be linked. See MOSLINK. Cr 2: the lead seems like an inadequate entree into the list. Double or...

the current guideline on that subject, which is this page [MOSLINK] Rename this page [MOSLINK to] Wikipedia:Linking The actions have been met with general...

links and identify related articles. Many changes to WP:MOSLINK#Red links Added to WP:MOSLINK#Capitalization: "(But capitalization does matter for all...

terms like Germany, Scotland, malnourishment and Swiss per WP:CONTEXT, WP:MOSLINK. Fixed, or at least significantly improved, according to my best judgment...

increased content that will be needed. There is some WP:OVERLINKing (see WP:MOSLINK), citation formatting needs to be completely reworked (see WP:CITE/ES)...

wikilinking every time reduces sheer usability, but I still stand by WP:MOSLINK, which argues that links are only necessary the first time per major...

understand the names but the positions and colleges are overlinked. Look at WP:MOSLINK, that should help with linking. Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 19:08, 15...

autoformatting and which now prescribes rules for the raw formatting), and MOSLINK and CONTEXT, so I've reduced some of it to allow your high-value links...

think of one, though). Please don't link "Australia" and "England". See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT]]. "who had all immigrated to the United States and specifically...

in the lead, for example) should not be linked (see WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK), while uncommon or technical terms should be linked or defined on first...

WP:LAYOUT, See also templates are used at the top of sections. Per WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, common words shouldn't be linked, and relevant words should...

FIXED!! Do we need a link for the common term "department stores"? See WP:MOSLINK. Unsure the link for "Spanish language" effort will help the reader; it's...

AJona1992 WP:DAB: found one Lead 01. 1965 doesn't need to be wikiliked per WP:MOSLINK 02. "Target" shouldn't be capitalize per WP:MOSCAPS History 01. This section...

first few sections; the remainder should be reviewed.[1] Have a look at WP:MOSLINK for guidance. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC) The lead...

why DVD should be linked at all is beyond me, but twice in a sentence? MOSLINK says avoid the linking of the names of familiar countries, esp. anglopohone...

language sources. The article is overlinked; have a look at WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINKS. Also, have a look at WP:MOSNUM and WP:CONTEXT for how to handle centuries...

the redundant word). "United States" should generally not be linked. See MOSLINK. Cr 2: the lead seems like an inadequate entree into the list. Double or...

emdash rather than endash, and See also contains spaced emdashes. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT; common words known to most English speakers need not be...

interested in this writer would likely be interested in his works. WP:MOSLINK seems to suggest that, when English links are not available, foreign language...

Avoid linking the names of anglophone countries and nationalities (see MOSLINK). Remove "native", since you've told us that already. Avoid "currently"...

necessary only for more technological and technical MilHist topics); and WP:MOSLINK, for advice on wikilinking and external linking. These pages have detailed...

(UTC) And under-referenced—1c. I have a question, Tony. Looking at the WP:MOSLINKS standard, there may be some low added-value links in the article like some...

to be light blue? "ancient texts" is the pipe for "Phonecian alphabet"? MOSLINK discourages deceptive pipes. Why not "ancient texts in the Phonecian alphabet"...

disappointing. Even blue link phobia is very common these days and enforced by WP:MOSLINK. I'm finding myself having to regularly copy and paste interesting topics...

not likely to be misunderstood (like "seconds") are also linked. See WP:MOSLINK for more details. The article is sketchy on its referencing. The first...

Fixed - I have unblued a lot of repeated links. I have, however, per WP:MOSLINK, retained repeated links in (a) infoboxes and picture captions, (b) occurrences...

be an exception to the rule of relevancy? I believe strongly in the WP:MOSLINK statement: "Internal links add to the cohesion and utility of Wikipedia...

autoformatting and now prescribes rules for the raw formatting); please also see MOSLINK and CONTEXT. I note your comment that you can't cope with US formatting—but...

thoughts about this? Gmatsuda 08:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Please see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT regarding overlinking of common terms in the article; I...

the FAC process; and I'm sorry to be rude ... don't take it personally.] MOSLINK says try not to bunch up links, and link to the most specific item: why...

Style main page; MOSNUM (for specialist advice on numbers and dates); and MOSLINK, for advice on wikilinking and external linking. These documents contain...

bit of WP:OVERLINKing in the article. See my sample edits, and see WP:MOSLINK. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC) Are there sources which...

bit troublesome. Burroughs is first mentioned in a quote, and since WP:MOSLINK says that "items within quotations should not generally be linked" the...

encouraged, and here, the high-value links need to breathe. Please see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT on this issue, plus the trivial linking of the names of...

terms next to each other, appearing to be a link to a single article (WP:MOSLINK) You could unlink "comedy" and "television series" without losing understanding...

references to independent sources. Gives examples of inappropriate articles. WP:MOSLINK → WP:Manual of Style/Linking Guidelines as to when links should and should...

26 August 2008 (UTC) PS "Railway" and "London": why linked. Please see MOSLINK and CONTEXT. Tony (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Done.--DavidCane (talk)...

autoformatting and which now prescribes rules for the raw formatting), and MOSLINK and CONTEXT, so I've reduced some of it to allow your high-value links...

repeating the links where they are relatively distant (as advised by WP:MOSLINK). I'm also looking into increasing the linking to the divisons, as this...

sample edits I made (WP:MOSBOLD, WP:MOSNUM, WP:MOSDATE, WP:CONTEXT, WP:MOSLINK, WP:DASH and pruning of external links per WP:EL, WP:RS, WP:NOT). SandyGeorgia...

discussions, it was merged with two other guideline pages to make the page WP:MOSLINK. This merger was well received and (once a few niggles over wording were...

of China infobox on the right and images on the left. Also, refer to WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, common terms known to most English speakers need not be...

(UTC) Both over and underlinking need review. See WP:OVERLINKing and WP:MOSLINK. Baseball jargon should all be linked or defined on first occurrence, common...

Arvind (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC) Lots of WP:OVERLINKing, see WP:MOSLINK and also lots ofWP:MOSDATE linking issues, full dates should be linked...

which is it, and isn't there a link? (Note, review all wikilinking per WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK). Why does this need seven citations? and regularly trades...

policies/guidelines. But what's the best discussion place -- WT:EL? WT:CITE/WT:NOR? WP:MOSLINK (MOS/links)? WP:MOSACCESS (MOS accessibility)? Links/cite/OR/MOS noticeboards...

against the free linking of chronological items (see also WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK); all three are parts of the Manual of Style. I first want to extend the...

Nixon as well. Happyme22 (talk) 05:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Please see WP:MOSLINK on the linking of common words, such as "charity". "Volunteerism" is probably...

thoughout. Let your high-value links breathe. This is a MOS breach—please see MOSLINK and CONTEXT. Done. I unlinked them. Kyriakos (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2008...

04:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Guidelines and rules of thumb can be found at WP:MOSLINK Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Can someone move the above article...

article whose edits/reverts repeatedly violate WP:RS, WP:CONSENSUS & WP:MOSLINKS, as well as removing legitimate templates (most notably one pointing out...

and HBO need repeat linking). Please review all of the linking per WP:MOSLINK. Here's a hanging ref tag, be sure to run through the entire article looking...

wrong with this article. Good job! Annoyomous24 21:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC) MOSLINK and CONTEXT both say to avoid the linking of common geographical names...

terms next to each other, appearing to be a link to a single article (WP:MOSLINK) You could unlink "comedy" and "television series" without losing understanding...

guideline page WP:Build the web would be merged with two other pages at WP:MOSLINK, and this was successfully done. Now a couple of editors have (without...

think that applies here. Colin°Talk 20:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC) See WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK-- there is still some overlinking (aspirin, for example)...

was not enough discussion for there to be consensus to merge BTW with MOSLINK and CONTEXT. Yet you persist here trying to force your "consensus" (which...

arises from major changes to long-standing practice, in MoS (main), MOSNUM, MOSLINK and CONTEXT last month.Tony (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC) For me...

article text. I always thought this was prohibited, but my look at WP:MOSLINK#Link titles proved inconclusive. Picture size should as a rule be at free...

linked, falling explicitly under the category of "plain English words". WP:MOSLINK states "In tables and infoboxes, units should not be internally linked...

understand the names but the positions and colleges are overlinked. Look at WP:MOSLINK, that should help with linking. Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 19:08, 15...

wrong with this article. Good job! Annoyomous24 21:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC) MOSLINK and CONTEXT both say to avoid the linking of common geographical names...

the "languages" section on the left for entire articles. I did read WP:MOSLINK, WP:REDLINK, and WP:INTERWIKI which show the mechanics, but are they appropriate...

there would be some point so I did. He is confusing with guidelines of WP:MOSLINK and not willing to talk about the WP:OVERLINKING guideline. There are a...

two links "next to each other in the text" are prohibited by WP:MOSLINK. No, MOSLINK says "An article may be overlinked if any of the following is true...

glacier-related edits to reinsert a link to 'USA', which is discouraged per MOSLINK, whilst at the same time removing the {{use mdy dates}} template. I don't...

county, state, country bunches the links in a way that is discouraged by WP:MOSLINK. Why not focus the blue link-indicator on the most specific, from which...

repeat throughout the article - these are generally unnecessary. See WP:MOSLINK for advice on linking. Ox cart is sometimes spelled "oxcart" and sometimes...

from the text) would make a difference. Overlinking: please note that MOSLINK says not to link the names of commonly known countries (i.e., nationalities...

wikilinking every time reduces sheer usability, but I still stand by WP:MOSLINK, which argues that links are only necessary the first time per major...

much of a linking expert actually, ask User:Tony1 or put a question on WT:MOSLINK. This linking issue is not a deal-breaker, I'm still willing to support...

article anyway. Better to focus the reader on a single patch of blue. See MOSLINK on bunched links. Removed links Jujutacular talk 04:21, 30 October 2010...

punctuated, sentence fragments are not. Overlinked, see WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK, common terms known to most English speakers need not be linked. Surely...

September 2010 (UTC) Looks serviceable in terms of prose. Overlinking: MOSLINK says to avoid bunched linking; I wonder who wants a direct blue-link to...

necessarily a deal-breaker here (or the others), but I'm just going off WP:MOSLINK. Especially when all the citations lead to essentially similar pages. Drewcifer...

context, but I wanted to make sure the point was raised. See Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Quotation and Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context/Archive...

with a caveat that we add a small non-guidance statement to MOSNUM or MOSLINK stateing explicitly "Links to dates are not treated any differently than...

problem with seeral of the same items being linked repeatedly. Per WP:MOSLINKS, they should only be linked once, unless they are introduced far apart...

Comment:Pass There's quite a number of piped links which as per Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Piped_links are "easter eggs" which require the user to follow the link...

cohesion. It looks like there are a lot of repeated wikilinks. Check WP:MOSLINK, but in most cases, there really shouldn't be more than two links to a...

Avoid linking the names of anglophone countries and nationalities (see MOSLINK). Remove "native", since you've told us that already. Avoid "currently"...

repeating the links where they are relatively distant (as advised by WP:MOSLINK). I'm also looking into increasing the linking to the divisons, as this...

Comments Try not to wikilink two words next to each other in the text, per WP:MOSLINK. It looks like Taiwanese girl group, which is confusing. Changed to "girl...

FIXED!! Do we need a link for the common term "department stores"? See WP:MOSLINK. Unsure the link for "Spanish language" effort will help the reader; it's...

wiki link to another wikipedia language. I've read WP:INTERWIKI and WP:MOSLINK and tried playing in my sandbox without joy. The diff of the user's question...

and we find trolleybuses linked twice within a few sentences. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, common words need not be linked and only the first occurrence...

that. Fosnez (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC) Let's look at the page WP:MOSLINK#Context. This is a guideline, it provides some rules. Now there is Help:Piped...

context, but I wanted to make sure the point was raised. See Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Quotation and Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context/Archive...

better. Done - ǀ Mikay ǀ 15:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Overlinking. WP:MOSLINK says that you should not link a term multiple times in the same article...

they are mentioned. For me this is overlinking and distracting, as per WP:MOSLINK. Lou.weird (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Oh geez, you're quite right...

first use is linked, and linked a few other sources. My reading of WP:MOSLINK gives no exception for reference sections, and only the first instance...

--Tone 07:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Comment: it needs a good copy-edit. MOSLINK discourages sequential links; can you relocate "France Cukjati", and please...

19 May 2008 (UTC) It was requested at the A-Class Review to follow WP:MOSLINK and re-link in each section, lead, RD and history. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:04...

(UTC) Notes: hurricane seasons are piped to a year link; see Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Dates. Y'all are again leaving out full publication dates on citations...

my article, I'd clean them out and link only the first occurrence (see MOSLINK). Long piped strings such as "largest shopping centres in the United Kingdom"...

as a more concrete proposal in MoS talk. While it could be taken to WT:MOSLINK, or perhaps WT:MOSNUM which covers dates, you'll get more input at WT:MOS...

should, in the majority, be based upon WP:SECONDARY sources. Please read WP:MOSLINKS#Link titles -- you should at the very least provide the title of the webpage...

example: During the 1962–1966 period, ... There is some overlinking; see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT. Common words known to most English-speaking people, like...

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC) Overlinked as well (see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC) OK, perhaps...

merging in a different guideline. They were reverted A Wikipedia_talk:MOSLINK#Resurrect this guideline? discussion ensued, which showed that there was...

punctuation at the end, sentence fragments do not. I think this is  Done See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, words commonly know to most English speakers that don't...

separate, so one of those can go. "English" should not be linked. See MOSLINK. "Boarding school"? We do speak English. Tons of repeated links (such as...

I got it right this time when it comes to the wikilinks. I went to WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking and underlinking and found out why this article had problems...

clarity in separating quotes from comments ... maybe I should stop it!). MOSLINK discourages bunched links, and links to items every person on the planet...

The MoS guidline on linking leaves room for subjective opinion. Per WP:MOSLINKS, "links should be included where it is most likely that readers might want...

linked. Please delink common words known to most English speakers per WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT; they make it harder to get through the text and dilute...

themselves have been stable. The occasional tension on MOS, MOSNUM and MOSLINK talk pages is not in a way that is damaging to the project. I will do more...

Comments Try not to wikilink two words next to each other in the text, per WP:MOSLINK. It looks like Taiwanese girl group, which is confusing. Changed to "girl...

- Talk 14:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Not happy yet. Examples from the top: MOSLINK recommends that major countries such as Canada/ian not be linked. Fixed...

WP:BTW and WP:MOSLINK, specifically the three threads at WP:AN/I, the one (or more) threads at WP:AN, the various new discussions at WT:MOSLINK and WT:BTW...

dozens and dozens of people who've turned up to comment, whether at MOSNUM, MOSLINK, Lightmouse's talk page, or wherever, because they're unhappy with what...

about it, please raise the matter at the talk pages (MOSNUM, CONTEXT, MOSLINK, et al.). Tony (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC) How could it have support...

that I must not have any "idea what (I'm) doing"). I've looked through WP:MOSLINK and WP:NAMES, but I can't seem to find anything about including honorifics...

link to Delhi to help users find out more information the city (see WP:MOSLINK for full details). Please let us know if this hasn't answered your question...

seems like it should be easy, but nope. I've read WP:INTERWIKI and WP:MOSLINK and tried playing in my sandbox without success. The user's question is...

few points to clear up. --Sarastro1 (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) MOSLINK says to avoid bunched links: why are both baseball and outfielder adjacently...

would be willing to adjust it. --Rschen7754 05:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC) MOSLINK discourages bunched linking, for good reason. And unfocused linking (why...

Carolina|Abbeville]], [[South Carolina]], [[United States|U.S.]] - that's several MOSLINK issues in a single line. Your citation formatting in particular is all...

lead and first section. Sasata (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC) WP:MOSLINK says "When possible, avoid placing links next to each other so that they...

from he body, but considering the size of the article, I thought per WP:MOSLINK, keeping "the first occurrence after the lead"? Yes that is right. Anotherclown...

vast oceans of irrelevant details. It's self-defeating to use them. WP:MOSLINK already says not to use them. Tony (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)...

doesn't know what "singer" means. Or "actor". Why are they linked? See MOSLINK. I've removed them, with one query—you piped "Theatre director" to "director";...

top of the first, which looks like a crummy article. And they breach MOSLINK's advice about bunching. "Sheffield Doc/Fest" is the high-value link here—it's...

to each other? The latter contains a very prominent link to the former. MOSLINK says to be specific. (Same for the NE and Ph in the infobox: readers need...

law is used multiple times in the article before it is linked. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK-- link on first occurrence. Please review throughout. Inconsistent...

glancing at the lead only, I see overlinking. Please review WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK. Most English-speaking readers know what soap is and it need not be linked;...

such as "hell" and "crowd" which shouldn't be there. Take a look at WP:MOSLINKS then go through and amend the article as required.  Done Cheers, CP 02:39...

  Changing the world one edit at a time! 12:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC) Per WP:MOSLINK, please don't link 'world'. ;) Kayau Voting IS evil 12:35, 14 January 2011...

(talk) 22:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC) The Manual of Style guideline is at WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking and underlinking. If you find an overlinked article, you could...

when you hit it. Why is "civilians" linked? Please see WP:CONTEXT and MOSLINK. Audit the whole article to weed out trivial links: let your high-value...

September 2012 (UTC) Hi, try reading the information on this page, Wikipedia:MOSLINK, this covers all the aspects of what should and should not be linked, and...

these cases. Talking of clutter, there's a lot of unnecessary linking. MOSLINK and CONTEXT say drop the linking of well-known geographical names, such...

(like Spain, United States and English) linked (see WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK)? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Comment — Done. (Ibaranoff24...

tonight, the linking issue might give you something to work on. See WP:MOSLINK for guidance, and WP:RED. There has been a focus lately at FAC on WP:OVERLINKing...

notable topic for a list here. Wikipedia is also about linking. See WP:MOSLINK. Both lists and categories support the connection of areas of knowledge...

I'm not crazy about that, although I can't find anything about it in WP:MOSLINK. You hyphenated "full-length" in the prose but not in the heading. When...

approximately a third. kwami (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Please note that MOSLINK says not to link common geographical terms such as "United States". "Haumea...

most readers in context" or insufficiently specific to the topic (per WP:MOSLINK). Retained links to species description and range (biology) (the latter...

should, in the majority, be based upon WP:SECONDARY sources. Please read WP:MOSLINKS#Link titles -- you should at the very least provide the title of the webpage...

enough info for the interest of a general reader of the enyclopaedia. WP:MOSLINKS problems. I tried to clean it up by removing general wikilinks, but there...

the prose looks generally OK. Why are "France" and "England" linked? See MOSLINK. the only Catholic signatory to, not signer of, I think. "he had moved...

12:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC) I think "BC" should not be wikilinked per WP:MOSLINK, although it's not really a unit of measure. However, it is very common...

but is there a way to do it outside the quote so it lines up with WP:MOSLINK? Not really. Aaron • You Da One I'm not sure you represent the Daily News...

" So its ethnic diversity is somehow unexpected in a huge country? WP:MOSLINK says to try to make links as focused as possible. You might consider, piping...

why DVD should be linked at all is beyond me, but twice in a sentence? MOSLINK says avoid the linking of the names of familiar countries, esp. anglopohone...

(Talk) 01:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Comments. Seriously overlinked (see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT), needs WP:MSH attention to repeat words in section headings...

hyphens throughout. Common words (like cookbook) should be delinked per WP:MOSLINK, WP:CONTEXT. Quotes are incorrectly italicized, see WP:ITALICS. SandyGeorgia...

- terms should generally be linked once or twice in an article (see WP:MOSLINKS). In the "Production" section, for example, people's names and movie titles...

the current guideline on that subject, which is this page [MOSLINK] Rename this page [MOSLINK to] Wikipedia:Linking The actions have been met with general...

like the one in the lead for the Toronto Arenas. Please see Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Intuitiveness. "... by 1926 consisted of ten teams in Ontario, Quebec and...

14:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Linking of "sculpture": breach of WP:MOSLINK—"In general, do not create links to the following:.. Plain English words"...

matter of counting links or density. Please see WP:OVERLINKing and WP:MOSLINK. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Well, if I ever finish...

links in any articles? Or maybe you could find the passage in WP:MOS or WP:MOSLINKS where it says that as well? The article contains maybe 3-4 redlinks. I...

do we know that? Gone. --TorsodogTalk 02:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC) WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking and underlinking - Obvious words such as "architect" and "skyscraper"...

removed the autoformatting, which is no longer encouraged by MOSNUM. Also, MOSLINK says don't bother with links to London and such well-known geographical...

notable topic for a list here. Wikipedia is also about linking. See WP:MOSLINK. Both lists and categories support the connection of areas of knowledge...

not pipe the whole group? Be explicit, where it's reasonably brief. See MOSLINK. I think there's a case for the 1973 FA Cup link to be in the "See also"...

that has a "no refs" notice at the top. My long-winded point is that WP:MOSLINK insists that links should be focused, where possible, for reader utility...

2009 (UTC) Support perhaps with a caveat, maybe a statement in MOSNUM or MOSLINK that states explicitly "dates are not treated any differently than any...

Why are solo years and centuries linked throughout (see WP:MOSDATE, WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK). Why are common places known to everyone, like Greece...

assessment of the page is on point. Review WP:EL#External links section, WP:MOSLINK#External links section, and lastly, the policy WP:LINKFARM. --Izno (talk)...

people. Also, "efficient method" is currently linked to Sturm chain. WP:MOSLINK advises that the article being linked to should be made clear by the words...

instead, where it's a proper service to readers, not a guessing game (see MOSLINK). Please see my comments below in Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Sunderland_A...

commonly known to most English speakers do not need to be linked. See WP:MOSLINK. There are unformatted incomplete references, example: 'Wicked' Shatters...

rules the same for all, right? More specifically, would something like WP:MOSLINK also apply to all non-English language Wikipedias? Thanks in advance -...

most English speakers, for example hero; pls review throughout per WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT. (I'll be traveling until next Tuesday, so won't be able...

hyphen heavy, tedious cleanup work is needed. Also, per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK, I don't see justification for all of the baseball year links to solo years...

print-out. This is similar to what is described as "easter egg" links at WP:MOSLINK. How about something like "This includes a record of the person's circumstances...

(Talk) 01:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Comments. Seriously overlinked (see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT), needs WP:MSH attention to repeat words in section headings...

" So its ethnic diversity is somehow unexpected in a huge country? WP:MOSLINK says to try to make links as focused as possible. You might consider, piping...

emdash rather than endash, and See also contains spaced emdashes. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT; common words known to most English speakers need not be...

the current guideline on that subject, which is this page [MOSLINK] Rename this page [MOSLINK to] Wikipedia:Linking The actions have been met with general...

in a couple of days.—indopug (talk) 06:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC) Per WP:MOSLINKS, "links should be included where it is most likely that readers might want...

with a caveat that we add a small non-guidance statement to MOSNUM or MOSLINK stateing explicitly "Links to dates are not treated any differently than...

article is overlinked to the point of impeding readability; pls see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT. Words commonly known to most English-speaking readers need...

Discussion page, helpfully pointing me to the appropiate WP:MOSLINK point. Checking WP:MOSLINK, I found another point that to me seemed to allow successive...

they are mentioned. For me this is overlinking and distracting, as per WP:MOSLINK. Lou.weird (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Oh geez, you're quite right...

and its effects"—remove the last three words ("relating to" does it). MOSLINK says not to link the names of such countries as "Britain". "deathS". "ALthough"...

numbered list rant. Clearly if Holderca1's comment is backed up my WP:MOSLINK, then those weren't "tons of redundant links". I'm pretty sure that here...

Onel5969 TT me 11:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC) I’ve fixed numerous links per WP:MOSLINK, and I believe it should remain a disambiguation page as there are numerous...

guess); and so often, they judder against another, more pertinent link (WP:MOSLINK says to try to avoid this, although I think it's not mandatory). Can I...

reverting a cosmetic change legitimate under nothing more dramatic than WP:MOSLINK, in order to balance the tone away from defining hebephilia as what it...

of China infobox on the right and images on the left. Also, refer to WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, common terms known to most English speakers need not be...

from the text) would make a difference. Overlinking: please note that MOSLINK says not to link the names of commonly known countries (i.e., nationalities...

matter of counting links or density. Please see WP:OVERLINKing and WP:MOSLINK. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Well, if I ever finish...

much of a linking expert actually, ask User:Tony1 or put a question on WT:MOSLINK. This linking issue is not a deal-breaker, I'm still willing to support...

people. Also, "efficient method" is currently linked to Sturm chain. WP:MOSLINK advises that the article being linked to should be made clear by the words...

article anyway. Better to focus the reader on a single patch of blue. See MOSLINK on bunched links. Removed links Jujutacular talk 04:21, 30 October 2010...

few points to clear up. --Sarastro1 (talk) 09:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) MOSLINK says to avoid bunched links: why are both baseball and outfielder adjacently...

links and identify related articles. Many changes to WP:MOSLINK#Red links Added to WP:MOSLINK#Capitalization: "(But capitalization does matter for all...

instead, where it's a proper service to readers, not a guessing game (see MOSLINK). Please see my comments below in Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates#Sunderland_A...

linked. Please delink common words known to most English speakers per WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT; they make it harder to get through the text and dilute...

bit troublesome. Burroughs is first mentioned in a quote, and since WP:MOSLINK says that "items within quotations should not generally be linked" the...

approximately a third. kwami (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Please note that MOSLINK says not to link common geographical terms such as "United States". "Haumea...

tonight, the linking issue might give you something to work on. See WP:MOSLINK for guidance, and WP:RED. There has been a focus lately at FAC on WP:OVERLINKing...

The MoS guidline on linking leaves room for subjective opinion. Per WP:MOSLINKS, "links should be included where it is most likely that readers might want...

two links "next to each other in the text" are prohibited by WP:MOSLINK. No, MOSLINK says "An article may be overlinked if any of the following is true...

like the one in the lead for the Toronto Arenas. Please see Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Intuitiveness. "... by 1926 consisted of ten teams in Ontario, Quebec and...

not pipe the whole group? Be explicit, where it's reasonably brief. See MOSLINK. I think there's a case for the 1973 FA Cup link to be in the "See also"...

19 May 2008 (UTC) It was requested at the A-Class Review to follow WP:MOSLINK and re-link in each section, lead, RD and history. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:04...

law is used multiple times in the article before it is linked. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK-- link on first occurrence. Please review throughout. Inconsistent...

the prose looks generally OK. Why are "France" and "England" linked? See MOSLINK. the only Catholic signatory to, not signer of, I think. "he had moved...

I'm not crazy about that, although I can't find anything about it in WP:MOSLINK. You hyphenated "full-length" in the prose but not in the heading. When...

repeat throughout the article - these are generally unnecessary. See WP:MOSLINK for advice on linking. Ox cart is sometimes spelled "oxcart" and sometimes...

(UTC) Notes: hurricane seasons are piped to a year link; see Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Dates. Y'all are again leaving out full publication dates on citations...

not likely to be misunderstood (like "seconds") are also linked. See WP:MOSLINK for more details. The article is sketchy on its referencing. The first...

clarity in separating quotes from comments ... maybe I should stop it!). MOSLINK discourages bunched links, and links to items every person on the planet...

would be willing to adjust it. --Rschen7754 05:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC) MOSLINK discourages bunched linking, for good reason. And unfocused linking (why...

Carolina|Abbeville]], [[South Carolina]], [[United States|U.S.]] - that's several MOSLINK issues in a single line. Your citation formatting in particular is all...

bit of WP:OVERLINKing in the article. See my sample edits, and see WP:MOSLINK. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC) Are there sources which...

- Talk 14:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Not happy yet. Examples from the top: MOSLINK recommends that major countries such as Canada/ian not be linked. Fixed...

doesn't know what "singer" means. Or "actor". Why are they linked? See MOSLINK. I've removed them, with one query—you piped "Theatre director" to "director";...

12:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC) I think "BC" should not be wikilinked per WP:MOSLINK, although it's not really a unit of measure. However, it is very common...

hyphen heavy, tedious cleanup work is needed. Also, per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK, I don't see justification for all of the baseball year links to solo years...

(like Spain, United States and English) linked (see WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSLINK)? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Comment — Done. (Ibaranoff24...

these cases. Talking of clutter, there's a lot of unnecessary linking. MOSLINK and CONTEXT say drop the linking of well-known geographical names, such...

first use is linked, and linked a few other sources. My reading of WP:MOSLINK gives no exception for reference sections, and only the first instance...

example: During the 1962–1966 period, ... There is some overlinking; see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT. Common words known to most English-speaking people, like...

commonly known to most English speakers do not need to be linked. See WP:MOSLINK. There are unformatted incomplete references, example: 'Wicked' Shatters...

terms like Germany, Scotland, malnourishment and Swiss per WP:CONTEXT, WP:MOSLINK. Fixed, or at least significantly improved, according to my best judgment...

most readers in context" or insufficiently specific to the topic (per WP:MOSLINK). Retained links to species description and range (biology) (the latter...

punctuation at the end, sentence fragments do not. I think this is  Done See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, words commonly know to most English speakers that don't...

thoughts about this? Gmatsuda 08:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Please see WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT regarding overlinking of common terms in the article; I...

(UTC) And under-referenced—1c. I have a question, Tony. Looking at the WP:MOSLINKS standard, there may be some low added-value links in the article like some...

numbered list rant. Clearly if Holderca1's comment is backed up my WP:MOSLINK, then those weren't "tons of redundant links". I'm pretty sure that here...

Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:10, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Keep. It's up to WT:MOSLINK whether the MoS should mention "wingsuit combat" and whether this should...

first few sections; the remainder should be reviewed.[6] Have a look at WP:MOSLINK for guidance. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC) The lead...

do we know that? Gone. --TorsodogTalk 02:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC) WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking and underlinking - Obvious words such as "architect" and "skyscraper"...

which is it, and isn't there a link? (Note, review all wikilinking per WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK). Why does this need seven citations? and regularly trades...

county, state, country bunches the links in a way that is discouraged by WP:MOSLINK. Why not focus the blue link-indicator on the most specific, from which...

problem with seeral of the same items being linked repeatedly. Per WP:MOSLINKS, they should only be linked once, unless they are introduced far apart...

and we find trolleybuses linked twice within a few sentences. See WP:MOSLINK and WP:CONTEXT, common words need not be linked and only the first occurrence...

--Tone 07:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC) Comment: it needs a good copy-edit. MOSLINK discourages sequential links; can you relocate "France Cukjati", and please...

Fixed - I have unblued a lot of repeated links. I have, however, per WP:MOSLINK, retained repeated links in (a) infoboxes and picture captions, (b) occurrences...

I got it right this time when it comes to the wikilinks. I went to WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking and underlinking and found out why this article had problems...

Arvind (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC) Lots of WP:OVERLINKing, see WP:MOSLINK and also lots ofWP:MOSDATE linking issues, full dates should be linked...

and its effects"—remove the last three words ("relating to" does it). MOSLINK says not to link the names of such countries as "Britain". "deathS". "ALthough"...

lead and first section. Sasata (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC) WP:MOSLINK says "When possible, avoid placing links next to each other so that they...

- terms should generally be linked once or twice in an article (see WP:MOSLINKS). In the "Production" section, for example, people's names and movie titles...

but is there a way to do it outside the quote so it lines up with WP:MOSLINK? Not really. Aaron • You Da One I'm not sure you represent the Daily News...

the FAC process; and I'm sorry to be rude ... don't take it personally.] MOSLINK says try not to bunch up links, and link to the most specific item: why...

(UTC) Both over and underlinking need review. See WP:OVERLINKing and WP:MOSLINK. Baseball jargon should all be linked or defined on first occurrence, common...

in a couple of days.—indopug (talk) 06:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC) Per WP:MOSLINKS, "links should be included where it is most likely that readers might want...

cohesion. It looks like there are a lot of repeated wikilinks. Check WP:MOSLINK, but in most cases, there really shouldn't be more than two links to a...

from he body, but considering the size of the article, I thought per WP:MOSLINK, keeping "the first occurrence after the lead"? Yes that is right. Anotherclown...

Comment:Pass There's quite a number of piped links which as per Wikipedia:MOSLINK#Piped_links are "easter eggs" which require the user to follow the link...

think that applies here. Colin°Talk 20:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC) See WP:MOSLINK and WP:OVERLINK-- there is still some overlinking (aspirin, for example)...

AJona1992 WP:DAB: found one Lead 01. 1965 doesn't need to be wikiliked per WP:MOSLINK 02. "Target" shouldn't be capitalize per WP:MOSCAPS History 01. This section...

from he body, but considering the size of the article, I thought per WP:MOSLINK, keeping "the first occurrence after the lead"? Yes that is right. Anotherclown...

a content dispute that might be resolved by starting an RfC over at WT:MOSLINKS. I don't see why it had to escalate to ANI, there seems to be some disagreement...

citing MOS:OVERLINK, while I disagree, citing WP:IGNORE and arguments in WT:MOSLINKS#OVERLINK vs GEOLINK. How have you tried to resolve this dispute before...