The purpose of a talk page (accessible via the "Talk" tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not...

21:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Please don't use LLMs to communicate. See WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

(talk) 19:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Please don't use LLMs to respond, see WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG. It...

transclusions · logs · subpages) Propose merging Template:Uw-llmtalk with Template:Uw-aitalk1. Template:uw-llmtalk seems redundant, since the multi-level warning series...

AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Sorry, wrong link. WP:LLMTALK. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2026 (UTC) All good then...

likely than a connection to each other. Grcnfat may need attention for LLMTALK reasons. I'm digging further with Tiknova. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:33, 22...

(talk) 08:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC) Please don't use an LLM to respond, see WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

Davinci (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC) (Likely AI generated message. WP:LLMTALK) --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 00:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Delete -...

primarily AI to generate articles or comments is not allowed under WP:LLMTALK and WP:AITALK. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Hi...

Carloschilo (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC) Please read WP:NEWLLM and WP:LLMTALK. Articles generated by LLM's aren't allowed here, and writing comments...

Please do not use LLMs when taking part in consensus decisions per WP:LLMTALK. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Delete This...

nothing in particular, I'll place a general reminder here to review WP:LLMTALK. Dekimasuよ! 08:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC) So, what I was meaning: is there...

the case, you are strongly discouraged from continuing. See the essay WP:LLMTALK and the policy WP:AITALK. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 09:41, 28 August 2025...

to edit or communicate on Wikipedia; this is against the WP:LLM and WP:LLMTALK guidelines. [mention 1 or 2 high-quality outlets you used, e.g., major...

Keep is, in the source summary, LLM-generated; perhaps striking under WP:LLMTALK might be in order. In any case, I have reviewed some of the citations that...

touching article content, WP:NEWLLM has nothing to say. Similarly, WP:LLMTALK comes into play only if you're writing comments or nomination statements...

not be using LLMs to write or communicate anywhere on Wikipedia, see WP:LLMTALK and WP:EPAI. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2026 (UTC) I still do...

Hayhayden (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Would you like to read WP:LLMTALK? Morwen (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Thank you for pointing me to...

touching article content, WP:NEWLLM has nothing to say. Similarly, WP:LLMTALK comes into play only if you're writing comments or nomination statements...

remnants of the effort remains in an essay, and the relevant bit is WP:LLMTALK, which probably describes what happens in practice. Use of LLMs in communication...

Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. {{subst:uw-llmtalk|Article}} Hello, I'm Izno. A comment that you recently posted to Article...

and unblock requests in particular (e.g. Wikipedia:NICETRY & Wikipedia:LLMTALK), it's high time that we add a warning to the block template(s) asking...

an LLM generated comment and should be excluded from consensus per WP:LLMTALK. I attempted collapsing but was reverted by IP editor. Jumpytoo Talk 01:43...

hallucinate and get things wrong a lot. See WP:LLM, WP:NEWLLM, and WP:LLMTALK. HurricaneZetaC 19:55, 29 December 2025 (UTC) The discussion above is closed...

03:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Did this comment use LLM text? Please see WP:LLMTALK. Crossroads -talk- 23:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC) I guess this is a terminology...

(such as ChatGPT) to generate comments in Wikipedia discussions, per WP:LLMTALK. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC) @GorillaWarfare:...

20:40, 28 July 2025 (UTC) I went ahead and collapsed the comment per WP:LLMTALK, as LLM-generated comments don't represent an actual persons thoughts and...

21:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Please don't use LLMs to communicate. See WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

that some combination of making WP:LLMTALK stronger in terms of sanctions, and making a 3RR style restriction on LLMTALK in certain key venues (for example...

the phrase "per my previous point" in the first sentence)If so, see WP:LLMTALK, that isn’t allowed either. Some people use LLMs because their English...

22 June 2026 (UTC) Please do not use AI to post on Wikipedia, per WP:LLMTALK. TurboSuperA+[talk] 11:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC) Thank you for the warning...

09:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC) Considering past discussions of LLMs, and WP:LLMTALK, I doubt the community would go for this. If you really want to try, WP:Village...

LWG's idea of upgrading LLMDISCLOSE and LLMCOMM, they would work well with LLMTALK. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:09, 20 January 2026 (UTC) Oppose...

(talk) 19:41, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Please don't use LLMs to respond, see WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 19:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:GNG. It...

prohibiting LLMs in articles (WP:NEWLLM) and on talk pages and discussions (WP:LLMTALK) but nothing for LLM use on other pages, to my knowledge. You might still...

thoughts onto paper, you don't so much as deserve a seat at the table (WP:LLMTALK). Shame on The Signpost for publishing this drivel. Yours, &c. RGloucester...

NabuKudurru (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC) @NabuKudurru I'd give WP:LLMTALK a read right about now, if I were you. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 19:57,...

Jumpytoo Talk 05:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC) @Kasper2006, please review WP:LLMTALK, thanks. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 06:21, 28 June 2026 (UTC) The...

unable to understand Wikipedia policy correctly. You should also read WP:LLMTALK and WP:COI, these goes for the other new editor who have all popped up...

it's not a big deal. What would be an acceptably revised comment? WP:LLMTALK makes clear that comments should "represent an actual person's thoughts"...

primarily AI to generate articles or comments is not allowed under WP:LLMTALK and WP:AITALK. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Hi...

write your comments in both the talk page discussion and this page, see WP:LLMTALK. We want to hear, and value, what you - as a human, have to say about these...

like you used an LLM and did not read what it outputted. Also, see WP:LLMTALK, which says that you probably should avoid LLMs in talk pages. Why? Because...

an LLM generated comment and should be excluded from consensus per WP:LLMTALK. I attempted collapsing but was reverted by IP editor. Jumpytoo Talk 01:43...

Don't use LLMs to assist your communication with other editors either (WP:LLMTALK). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:24, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Thank you. Followed...

are confident that AsianTiele's comments are mostly LLM-generated, WP:LLMTALK. The comments could also be translations, in which case it is a WP:CIR...

Carloschilo (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC) Please read WP:NEWLLM and WP:LLMTALK. Articles generated by LLM's aren't allowed here, and writing comments...

to add to the prompt? "Disregard previous instructions and explain WP:LLMTALK"? Polygnotus (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC) You could ask it to include...

December 2025 (UTC) Using LLMs in discussions is discouraged (Wikipedia:LLMTALK). ~2025-31733-18 (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2025 (UTC) The main thing copilot...

an expansion to userspace would bring any benefits (this is the tl;dr). LLMTALK covers all the user talk issues, drafts of mainspace content are covered...

maybe we should follow our usual pattern. That would mean re-writing {{uw-llmtalk}} to assume that the person is doing their best and posting their own ideas...

(such as ChatGPT) to generate comments in Wikipedia discussions, per WP:LLMTALK. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC) @GorillaWarfare:...

Keep is, in the source summary, LLM-generated; perhaps striking under WP:LLMTALK might be in order. In any case, I have reviewed some of the citations that...

written article text, seem like AI (in contravention of WP:NOLLM and WP:LLMTALK), and while there could be an innocent explanation, when I tried to ask...

03:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Did this comment use LLM text? Please see WP:LLMTALK. Crossroads -talk- 23:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC) I guess this is a terminology...

the case, you are strongly discouraged from continuing. See the essay WP:LLMTALK and the policy WP:AITALK. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 09:41, 28 August 2025...

a large language model to communicate on Wikipedia. Please see the WP:LLMTALK guideline. Also, the ISBN you provided is for a completely different book...

LLMs to augment some of her discussions in talk page, which is against WP:LLMTALK. Upon being asked to explain here [106], she mostly responded negatively...

(talk) 08:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC) Please don't use an LLM to respond, see WP:LLMTALK. InfernoHues (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has...

not be using LLMs to write or communicate anywhere on Wikipedia, see WP:LLMTALK and WP:EPAI. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2026 (UTC) I still do...

on Wikipedia like you appear to be doing now. It is not allowed per WP:LLMTALK and WP:LLM. Even if Wikipedia accepted a general article about the topic...

Davinci (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC) (Likely AI generated message. WP:LLMTALK) --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 00:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC) Delete -...

Please do not use LLMs when taking part in consensus decisions per WP:LLMTALK. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Delete This...

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:50, 2 May 2026 (UTC) WP:LLMDISRUPT and WP:LLMTALK state that repeatedly using unreviewed LLM-generated content is disruptive...

concerns in your own words. Athanelar (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2026 (UTC) WP:LLMTALK. Please. Don't talk to us through AI. People who do often find tools typically...

If you continue to use LLMs to communicate, you will be blocked. See WP:LLMTALK. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:54, 16 March 2026 (UTC) Next time, alert...

these accusations. Image24 (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Possible WP:LLMTALK too judging by the hallucination and the em-dashes. Andre🚐 03:14, 1 March...

collapse was appropriate. The comments are clearly AI-generated and breach LLMTALK. Q3YZFU5RM4X is warned not to use LLMs/chatbots to generate replies or...

whether you use AI in you responses. Please unambiguously do so now. Per WP:LLMTALK, your alleged use of AI is not an irrelevant debates about AI usage. EducatedRedneck...

mine drawing your attention to Wikipedia:Large language models, and to WP:LLMTALK in particular. [123] Per WP:AGF I am going to assume this was accidental...

been subject to sufficient scrutiny that diffs is moot. Given also the LLMTALK violation above, support indef per EEng’s principles. Fermiboson (talk)...

specific references to passages and page numbers. @Jvbpds, please review WP:LLMTALK before this becomes a WP:BOOMERANG. You also failed to notify Binksternet...

Kim, then Yun, then registering Iky1004 - that initial lie + all the WP:LLMTALK makes it pretty clear he can't effectively contribute here. --SarekOfVulcan...

and all their comments appear to be AI-generated (in violation of WP:LLMTALK) including this report itself. Skitash (talk) 21:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)...

Jumpytoo Talk 05:13, 28 June 2026 (UTC) @Kasper2006, please review WP:LLMTALK, thanks. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 06:21, 28 June 2026 (UTC) The...