Search Results: Wikipedia:LEADCITE


Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section
Sabtu, 2026-08-01 01:23:10

placed between the TOC and the first heading. Shortcuts MOS:LEADCITEMOS:LEADCITE MOS:CITELEADMOS:CITELEAD The lead section must conform to verifiability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jevons paradox/1
Rabu, 2019-05-01 04:02:22

Delist per above and more Citations in the lead are unecessary per WP:LEADCITE Incosistency: "100 percent" and "100%". Several paragraphs lack citations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Wild Bunch/1
Rabu, 2025-08-13 19:07:02

but WP:LEADCITE and WP:COATRACK is yet another minor issue that needs to be cleaned up. -- 109.76.132.191 (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC) LEADCITE allows...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/A-Class FAQ
Kamis, 2025-10-30 09:20:15

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). Be aware that the A-Class review will include a source review focussed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Knights of Columbus/1
Rabu, 2021-02-17 02:43:41

present in the lead but not in the body, also doubling as a violation of WP:LEADCITE "History" section is woefully short even with the subpage. "Degrees" and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Indian road network
Rabu, 2013-12-11 17:05:50

a better product. –Fredddie™ 03:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Lead Per WP:LEADCITE, unless there are contentious facts, don't cite anything in the lead. Since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Anton Chekhov/archive1
Minggu, 2020-10-25 07:15:26

for some reason; definitely too many There a substantial amount of WP:LEADCITE, and the lead in general seems far too short, especially when compared...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/McKinsey & Company/1
Senin, 2021-07-12 18:30:11

questionable sources, the lead also needs to be rid of most or not all of its citations per WP:LEADCITE.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Augustus Post/archive1
Sabtu, 2020-06-06 06:45:32

(32 kB)), the article should have a lead that is ~3 paragraphs long. MOS:LEADCITE also states that citations aren't necessary in the lead if the information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jack Gets in the Game/1
Jumat, 2025-06-20 20:39:19

AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Fails the GA criteria 1 for MOS:LEADCITE violations, 2 for most of the sources are primary ones and most of them...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/From Dust
Senin, 2023-02-27 14:49:16

WP:NFCC. The first image is plenty to demonstrate the game's elements. WP:LEADCITE states that anything in the lead that's in the body needn't be sourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Irwandi Yusuf/archive1
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 16:17:18

are cited in the article, they don't need to be cited in the lead per WP:LEADCITE. If they are not in the article body, they should probably be added to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Pocahontas (1995 film)/archive1
Selasa, 2017-11-28 10:08:59

sequel, though it's mentioned in the lede with a citation, violating WP:LEADCITE. Development: "That same month, Katzenberg held a meeting with the Feature...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Dartmouth College/archive1
Minggu, 2021-05-23 07:15:21

Most, if not all, of the citations in the lede should be removed per WP:LEADCITE. Those are the most glaring big picture issues I see. ~ HAL333 21:34, 25...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Johan Elverskog/archive1
Sabtu, 2026-05-16 18:43:26

supposed to summarize the article. Try to reduce citations on the lead per WP:LEADCITE He is currently Dedman Family → He is currently a Dedman Family and Professor...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Assessment/A-Class FAQ
Selasa, 2014-04-22 16:05:58

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Immortals of Meluha/1
Rabu, 2026-05-20 00:37:10

prejudice to renomination. Nominator does not appear to be familiar with MOS:LEADCITE. If the lead is not a summary of the referenced content in the body, or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Should have gone to Specsavers
Kamis, 2026-06-25 00:14:08

There is a references section, you just need to scroll down Actually, MOS:LEADCITE says information doesn't have to be given an inline reference if it is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/MS West Honaker
Kamis, 2026-01-22 03:44:51

uncited (unless there is a contentious fact that needs it). Please see WP:LEADCITE for further informattion. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Mahatma Gandhi/archive2
Kamis, 2022-05-26 02:56:41

first few sections: Dead link Quite a few citations in the lead - see WP:LEADCITE Quite a few harverrors in references - you might find User:Ucucha/HarvErrors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cape May County, New Jersey/archive1
Rabu, 2019-01-23 07:06:19

serious issues with sources. For formatting, the article does not follow MOS:LEADCITE and WP:INFOBOXCITE. There's a bare url (ref 101), and much of the "Notable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Embodiment of Scarlet Devil/archive1
Senin, 2021-08-30 06:44:17

in the lead are probably better off being moved to the body as per WP:LEADCITE. Anyway, I have a peer review of my own open and would appreciate any comments...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1920–39)/archive2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:41:16

per WP:LEADCITE additional references in the lead are not necessary. Harrias talk 10:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC) I would argue that WP:LEADCITE doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Hide (musician)/archive1
Jumat, 2019-01-25 02:25:57

MOS:TM. This should also be reflected in the text where necessary. Per MOS:LEADCITE, references are not typically included in the lead if they are also cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/D.C. United/archive1
Minggu, 2009-11-22 17:00:13

FC and Qwest Field peer reviews that seem to apply here as well: Per WP:LEADCITE the lead section should not require footnoted references since it should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Tupou VI/archive1
Senin, 2024-01-08 09:56:33

reliable sources. Try running InternetArchiveBot on the article. Per MOS:LEADCITE, citations should not be in the lead as it summarizes the article. Davest3r08...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Japan Crude Cocktail/archive1
Jumat, 2021-04-02 16:55:49

to be cited there, or else needs to be included in the body as well (WP:LEADCITE.) In terms of what's useful or appropriate for a general-purpose encyclopedia...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Philadelphia Phillies Opening Day starting pitchers
Senin, 2021-12-27 16:43:21

years, I feel that citing fifteen refs on one fact to be overkill per WP:LEADCITE and visually unappealing/distracting per WP:FL?'s Cr.6. Comments are welcome...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/David Archuleta/1
Kamis, 2025-05-01 21:09:08

infobox should be moved into the body of the article (MOS:INFOBOXCITE, MOS:LEADCITE) It doesn't look like there are any citations at all for the Performances...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/American Dad! (season 4)/archive1
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:06:50

fear propaganda refers to specifically  Done Added more to it. Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead generally doesn't contain references, as they should all be in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Petitcodiac River/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 17:19:32

later it should then be repeated in main. This has been under debate. WP:LEADCITE gives (what I find to be) a vague explanation to proceed, and there have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Occult Classic/archive1
Kamis, 2018-04-19 13:41:41

since there isn't anything present that's likely to be challenged. MOS:LEADCITE is a good reference for drafting a page intro. Thoughtful and contextually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Spirit Fruit Society/archive1
Kamis, 2022-05-05 12:12:53

Wikipelli Talk 17:35, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Direct quote must be cited per WP:LEADCITE Not sure soul needs to be linked. Fixed Unlinked Wikipelli Talk 17:35,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Japan Cup/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 06:46:44

believe this page follows nearly all MOSs I know of, though I'm aware MOS:LEADCITE is an exception to that currently - I'm still mulling over a graceful way...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Minecraft/archive1
Sabtu, 2022-10-01 19:25:30

2013 (UTC) Notes from Teancum (talk) 17:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC) Per WP:LEADCITE citations shouldn't be in the lead if the info exists in the body. WP:LEAD...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Nadodi Mannan/archive1
Senin, 2018-03-19 08:33:12

the infobox is part of the lead section, you may want to comply with WP:LEADCITE. You must mention how the film was a turning point in his later political...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Magdalena Egger/archive1
Kamis, 2026-04-30 19:53:14

review this. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE: Avoid citations on the lead if they are already referenced in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Radio Galaxy Zoo/archive1
Sabtu, 2018-08-11 19:28:53

improvement: In general, the lead should not contain citations as per MOS:LEADCITE. In the case of this article, the material in the lead is not repeated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Chartwell/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 16:38:49

caption should be attributed, and quotes in the lead should be cited per WP:LEADCITE Done. Sorry, what I was actually suggesting for the lead caption was in-text...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Wonderwall/archive1
Minggu, 2026-02-15 12:20:45

article to GA or FA. Also I believe section name is kinda long for me Per WP:LEADCITE, citiations in lead section are usually not welcome. The section name,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Walter W. Powell/archive2
Minggu, 2026-04-26 19:46:06

need to add other sections too. Do not place citations on the lead per WP:LEADCITE "Conceptualizing organizations as existing in networks within organizational...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/4INFO/archive1
Sabtu, 2015-12-12 21:37:50

linking to this Peer Review and asking for additional comments. Per WP:LEADCITE, all info in lede should be already cited to in-line cites, below later...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Panopticon (album)/archive1
Selasa, 2011-04-26 17:00:12

This directly contradicts what was said in the GA review it received; WP:LEADCITE basically says that only really contentious stuff needs citing in the lead;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Loham/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 01:43:27

first sentence is too long and should end after "state of Kerala". Per WP:LEADCITE, those citations ought to be in the body of the article, but not the lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/CobraNet/1
Jumat, 2023-02-24 06:06:30

re-write in order to meet the "well written" part of the criteria. Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead doesn't need to be sourced and would be better off being merged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Russ.lienart/Archive
Senin, 2022-01-17 12:12:45

pattern of disruption, including removal of sourced info in violation of WP:LEADCITE [1], and again at [2], and addition of unsourced and poorly sourced info...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/F-Zero (video game)
Kamis, 2023-02-09 13:16:53

infobox. I couldn't find anything about the downloadable version. Also, WP:LEADCITE states generally that unless there is a need to have citations in the lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Chibok schoolgirls kidnapping/archive1
Minggu, 2021-07-18 14:46:17

be general. Please let me know if you disagree with any of them. Per WP:LEADCITE, citations should not be used in the lead unless you are citing controversial...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Zarina Diyas/1
Jumat, 2023-04-07 18:06:37

(MOS:LEAD); "the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body" (MOS:LEADCITE). Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC) I didn't mean...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment/A-Class FAQ
Jumat, 2021-12-31 08:18:14

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides/archive1
Selasa, 2022-04-19 19:30:35

good. Notes Per WP:OVERLINK and the Infobox film documentation Per WP:LEADCITE Per WP:COPYPASTE IMDb page under Production notes See WP:CASTLIST Per WP:V...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Youth Against Rape/archive1
Jumat, 2020-11-13 14:50:00

references on one sentence in the lead is not necessary I would say. MOS:LEADCITE suggests references in the lead tend not to be needed, since the lead should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Courtney Love/archive1
Sabtu, 2014-09-13 03:01:57

Scottdoesntknow (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Yikes! Please see WP:LEADCITE—citations in the lead are discouraged except in special cases. The density...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The Conduit/archive1
Minggu, 2011-05-08 17:00:23

make a great naive reviewer but a useless expert. What the hey. Per WP:LEADCITE, the only things you really need to cite in the lead are assertions which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 February 11
Minggu, 2023-02-19 23:56:20

lead per MOS:LEADCITE, as long as the content is cited in the article body", but the named guideline says the opposite. Specifically, LEADCITE says that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Assessment/A-Class
Rabu, 2018-04-18 19:03:48

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Chicago Board of Trade Building/archive1
Selasa, 2020-08-11 07:15:29

immaterial to this review.) Here are some issues: There are too many LEADCITEs, much in common with other late-2000s FA promotions; they are not forbidden...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Characters
Rabu, 2025-12-24 03:18:46

preference, the lead may or may not need to include references (see WP:LEADCITE). This section is often the hardest to fill out, as it typically relies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Peer review/A1 (Croatia)
Sabtu, 2022-05-21 21:35:19

WP:LEADCITE specifies the opposite regarding the references. As far as level of detail is concerned, I'll try to squeeze something out yet. LEADCITE says...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Wiggles Pty Ltd/1
Senin, 2024-02-12 03:38:10

criterion 2B states that reliable sources should be cited inline, but the MOS:LEADCITE policy states (2nd paragraph): "Because the lead will usually repeat information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/University Mall (Little Rock, Arkansas)/1
Selasa, 2023-04-11 21:56:51

forgetting. Some of the [citation needed] tags were in violation of WP:LEADCITE, but I did find a decent amount of uncited content elsewhere in the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jack Sparrow/archive1
Rabu, 2022-03-16 13:28:38

(Talk) 23:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC) I think Kailash was referring to WP:LEADCITE, which indicates that citations are generally not used in lead sections...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Curly Girl Method/archive1
Senin, 2026-04-20 19:37:36

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:17, 20 March 2026 (UTC) First, please see WP:LEADCITE, do not place citations on the lead (the first part and introduction to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/New York City/archive8
Selasa, 2024-06-25 19:05:51

Epicgenius (talk) 13:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC) Driveby, unsourced statements, MOS:LEADCITE issues, and the article is 14.9k words long, which while technically below...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/March 2017
Jumat, 2017-03-31 06:30:46

per WP:LEADCITE additional references in the lead are not necessary. Harrias talk 10:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC) I would argue that WP:LEADCITE doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/George Lazenby/archive1
Sabtu, 2024-05-04 22:42:55

You have citations in the lead. Lead is generally to be uncited per MOS:LEADCITE Several sources are missing author names Need a thorough copy-edit, I do...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Demon's Souls
Minggu, 2010-09-26 06:08:11

the second paragraph in the Gameplay section is unsourced Fixed Per WP:LEADCITE if information is found elsewhere in the article, it should not be cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Bishan MRT station/archive1
Jumat, 2023-04-21 08:30:17

a second PR archive as needed. Don't put citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. Bishan station (then named Kampung San Teng) and at a Chinese cemetery...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Kubrick stare/archive1
Kamis, 2025-10-16 06:46:24

comprehensive, you need a more thorough survey of the literature. Lead: MOS:LEADCITE would expect cites only for the direct quotes. "Deemed "one of cinema's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Bigfoot/archive1
Rabu, 2024-04-03 01:32:52

in the lead should be removed/moved to the body of the article per MOS:LEADCITE. Hope to see this article eventually reach FAC. Good luck! -- ZooBlazer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints/1
Kamis, 2025-05-01 21:20:07

look to you as it currently stands? Note that per my understanding of MOS:LEADCITE, few if any citations are required in the lead section, as it summarizes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Transformers: Dark of the Moon/1
Selasa, 2025-03-11 04:45:17

to be) in the article, it is not necessary to cite here (expecting WP:LEADCITE. The cast section should be like this. The infobox includes Japan release...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 February 3
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 09:11:12

on 2023 February 11. Izno (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Template:Leadcite_comment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) The above discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurricane Gonzalo/archive1
Selasa, 2025-01-21 00:15:35

a road" – quotations in the lead should have inline citations per MOS:LEADCITE (or rephrase into your own words) Guadeloupe – the first mention (in Preparations)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Literary Hall/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 01:43:29

first sentence, but right now you say U.S. before United States. Per WP:LEADCITE, the Michael J. Pauley quotes needs an in-line citation. Rationalobserver...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy/archive1
Sabtu, 2014-11-15 07:08:16

page, good job there. Not sure citations are needed in the lede, per WP:LEADCITE, those could all probably be removed, with a check to make sure same info...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Downtown Line/archive1
Jumat, 2026-03-06 10:57:07

opens? Generally there shouldn't need to be citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. History The planning → construction → expansion structure works well,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/September 11 attacks/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 17:26:47

  Cs32en Talk to me  01:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC) That's not accurate, read WP:LEADCITE. Information in the lead that is not general and is likely to be challenged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Doctor Who/archive2
Senin, 2023-12-25 22:23:54

underneath. UndercoverClassicist T·C 19:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC) MOS:LEADCITE: in general, it shouldn't be necessary to cite things in the lead, since...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Catholic Church/1
Jumat, 2024-03-01 07:27:37

appears to be a lede-style summary of the subsections afterward (a la WP:LEADCITE), with the relevant citations in the respective subsections. If truly desired...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Engines/page content
Selasa, 2020-12-29 02:56:13

elsewhere in the article text and are unlikely to be challenged (see WP:LEADCITE). It is usual to list all known aircraft type applications from reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/St Albans Market/archive2
Rabu, 2024-03-27 08:11:32

Specific minor issues WP:MOS asks that citations are kept out of the lead MOS:LEADCITE Pragraphs should not be so short. A few sentences or more is normal. Sometimes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hrithik Roshan/archive1
Rabu, 2025-09-24 03:27:16

lead requires no citations, but quoted material must be attributed per WP:LEADCITE: "material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and direct quotations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/172nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States)
Senin, 2021-11-01 17:22:55

the lead general so that citations in it would not be necessary, per WP:LEADCITE. All information in the lead section is now cited in other sections of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ozzie Smith/archive2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 04:25:51

awards, etc. written in there. These should all have references. Per WP:LEADCITE if they are referenced later in the article they do not need sourced in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Grand Theft Auto V/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 16:50:46

problem, so I will try to find another replacement for that. According to WP:LEADCITE, we don't specifically need citations in the lead if the statements are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Rajat Khare/archive1
Kamis, 2026-05-07 17:29:11

12:13, 25 March 2026 (UTC) Try to remove most citations in the lead per WP:LEADCITE Is there nothing about his early life? "stealing data from executives,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dorfromantik (board game)/archive1
Kamis, 2025-10-02 07:05:47

seem like the info isn't summarised in the body of the article. per WP:LEADCITE cites don't need to be in the lead unless for controversial info or quotes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suppressed research in the Soviet Union
Jumat, 2026-01-09 11:15:25

the citations in the main body and have none at all in the lead. See WP:LEADCITE. However, the policy section ought to be cited, and may be cut if this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/First Tennessee Park/archive1
Jumat, 2015-11-13 23:53:35

Internet Archive with WP:CIT fields archivedate and archiveurl. Per WP:LEADCITE, info presently cited in lede is non-controversial and not-contentious...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Nuclear power/archive1
Jumat, 2019-01-25 18:49:22

philly_boy92 The lead of an article should generally avoid citations, per WP:LEADCITE. It is assumed that the contents of the lead are a summary of the contents...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Electron/archive2
Rabu, 2022-03-23 20:54:48

not (as one example). Thank you. Mmm, yes well I've tried to follow WP:LEADCITE on this one. Everybody seems to have a different opinion on the matter...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)
Kamis, 2026-01-22 03:38:06

a line 18:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC) I am not seeing your point at WP:LEADCITE in terms a policy that citations clutter leads. Thanks for the weasel pointer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aphthous stomatitis/archive1
Minggu, 2014-07-27 20:32:37

review - spotchecks not done Why so many citations in the lead? See WP:LEADCITE Fixed number of columns is deprecated in {{reflist}} in favour of column...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Deep frying/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 01:44:46

Hope these help. Smurrayinchester 09:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Lead Per WP:LEADCITE, these citations ought to be in the article, but not the lead. has been...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Climate of Argentina/archive1
Sabtu, 2015-12-12 22:38:54

Internet Archive. Recommend archiving all links in article this way. Per WP:LEADCITE, all info in lede should be already cited to in-line cites, below later...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of UK Album Downloads Chart number ones of the 2000s/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 06:16:34

possible, could this be sourced? Unless you think it's unnecessary per WP:LEADCITE, I would cite them. I can't find any source that states this explicitly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/PlayStation 3/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:26:03

and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE issues - several references in the lead either need to be removed/moved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/2026 Iraqi presidential election/archive1
Jumat, 2026-04-17 19:32:59

the number of citations in the lead section is rather large, see MOS:LEADCITE and maybe think about moving some of those citations, especially because...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Citations in medical articles
Selasa, 2021-06-22 15:23:27

Wikipedia meme of keeping references out of the lead (as explained in WP:LEADCITE, part of the Manual of Style. A problem that affects regular medical editors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Final Fantasy IV/archive2
Senin, 2022-03-28 04:54:03

are my concerns: The lead contains refs which is unnecessary as per WP:LEADCITE if the information is cited in the body, which it is. Common terms and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Death of Elisa Lam/2
Rabu, 2026-07-08 03:49:56

2019 GAR. There are citations in the lead, which should be removed per WP:LEADCITE. (Fixed. Y) The final paragraph of Elevator video is an WP:MNA and reads...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ctenomyids/archive1
Rabu, 2025-11-19 06:25:52

lead and into "Classification" where the information is repeated per MOS:LEADCITE Ref 2 is citing the sentence it's attached to, not the count of species...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Details Cannot Body Wants/archive1
Minggu, 2025-04-06 12:01:09

I removed a few links per WP:OL and moved some refs in the lead per WP:LEADCITE. One issue I found with your article was the similar wording throughout...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/William Sterling Parsons
Senin, 2023-02-27 15:11:29

09:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC) All the paragraphs are sourced. Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead does not require citations. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:27, 30 September...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review
Selasa, 2026-08-04 06:54:03

IDLI apply, also in addressing LEADCITE. I did find some problems (some kindly addressed), For example: MOS:LEADCITE is pretty much required for FAs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Alberta general elections/archive1
Selasa, 2011-05-10 19:50:58

April 2011 (UTC) The intro shouldn't have a lot of references, per WP:LEADCITE, it would just be repeating the same citation. The intro is a summary of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Carolina Panthers/archive1
Senin, 2023-02-27 20:55:21

seems like there should be a "$" somewhere in "USD 1 billion". Although WP:LEADCITE doesn't say so explicitly, I think it would be a good idea to include an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/December 2020
Senin, 2020-12-21 07:25:44

Mattximus (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Delist per all. There are plenty of LEADCITEs. The "Key" table can likely be merged in the main table if it isn't crufty...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Croatian submissions for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film/archive1
Selasa, 2024-12-31 03:07:44

sources in the body. Timbouctou (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC) I agree, WP:LEADCITE does provide for omission of citations in the lead on "case by case basis"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Production I.G/archive1
Minggu, 2023-09-03 06:47:58

"Headquartered in Musashino, Tokyo" can be moved to the history section per WP:LEADCITE, as it's not particularly controversial. The revenue numbers in the infobox...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/.hack (video game series)
Rabu, 2010-07-28 17:09:32

references never hurt anyone. Axem Titanium (talk) 09:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE - They do actually harm tranclusion so without a justifiable reason they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/USS Princess Matoika (ID-2290)
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:06:54

Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 09:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC) This is addressed in WP:LEADCITE. Many great leads have no citations at all. Plasticup T/C 14:48, 10 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Battle of Hampton Roads
Senin, 2023-03-20 13:44:48

did not mean the lead, in fact you do not need to cite the lead per WP:LEADCITE. I was referring to another section. -MBK004 03:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Maxwell's Silver Hammer/archive1
Sabtu, 2025-05-03 13:33:38

body, which goes against MOS:INTRO --- see WP:LEADDD Also check for WP:LEADCITE. Not a requirement, but generally one should be able to do away with citations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Wind Rises/archive1
Sabtu, 2024-01-20 07:25:29

Citation numbers are from this revision. I'd remove citation 1 per MOS:LEADCITE. It seems a bit excessive to cite basic first-sentence information from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Bolton/archive1
Rabu, 2014-10-08 11:21:35

with articles for U.S. cities, here are a few notes: Lead According to WP:LEADCITE, general information in the lead section need not be cited, especially...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The Marshall Mathers LP/archive2
Senin, 2018-07-02 13:56:59

include in the lead? If so, I would also include it in the infobox. Per MOS:LEADCITE, the lead should contain citations regarding information that could be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Murder of Ennis Cosby/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 01:43:15

committing the murder and asked that appeals in his case stop.[2] Per WP:LEADCITE, this citation belongs in the body, not the lead. Murder where he was working...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The Boys from Baghdad High/archive2
Kamis, 2022-05-26 16:16:02

and WP:LEAD I couldn't find anything at either pages which says this, WP:LEADCITE says "challenged or likely to be challenged, and quotations, should be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/24 (TV series)/archive2
Kamis, 2015-09-03 17:18:41

times. Is the existence of 24: Live Another Day controversial? Per WP:LEADCITE you don't need to source it in the lead if it is not. The same goes for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcohol without liquid
Minggu, 2025-11-16 21:14:42

suitable for its talk page. I'll just refute your main points: Per WP:LEADCITE, "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Jenny Morris (musician)/archive1
Sabtu, 2022-09-24 07:42:16

used multiple times in the lead. WP:Lead I'm looking at the specific WP:LEADCITE section. Consider The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Zeno Clash
Senin, 2021-09-13 20:08:36

simply not important enough to be the second sentence of the lead. Per WP:LEADCITE, I think the quotes and specific figures could be removed, along with the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/2014 Mayflower–Vilonia tornado/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 05:10:31

Do the two references in the lede need to be there? Would move per WP:LEADCITE, but up to you. Would suggest expanding on Obama's visit in the Aftermath...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)/archive2
Selasa, 2024-12-31 03:03:53

here are my comments No citations please in the lead. WP:LEAD. Per WP:LEADCITE some claims need refs in lead. Quotes should always have cites directly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/May 2011
Rabu, 2011-05-25 02:28:11

April 2011 (UTC) The intro shouldn't have a lot of references, per WP:LEADCITE, it would just be repeating the same citation. The intro is a summary of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wikipedia/1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:16:30

paragraph does need at least one reference except for lead sections (WP:LEADCITE) and plot sections of shows, books, movies, TV episodes, concerts, and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Singapore LRT stations/archive1
Senin, 2025-09-15 08:16:22

(and Rail Network page) is cited several times, and here I'll call in MOS:LEADCITE – you don't need redundant citations in the lead for things covered elsewhere...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay/archive1
Sabtu, 2022-09-24 14:24:12

film tie-in games." First off, quotes in the lead have to be sourced (WP:LEADCITE); secondly, this quote does jack for my understanding. "Play the movie...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/A-Class
Kamis, 2012-08-02 14:19:35

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Writing better articles
Minggu, 2026-07-19 23:42:59

place in the lead at all. Leads may (WP:WHENNOTCITE) – though need not (WP:LEADCITE) – omit sources since they are summaries of material cited in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Milton Keynes/archive1
Rabu, 2019-04-17 01:44:33

duplicated or discussed in more detail in the body, with few exceptions, see WP:LEADCITE. According to the Middleton page, Milton Keynes Village is the name, so...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SS Ohioan (1914)
Minggu, 2022-04-24 02:44:59

something new. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 01:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC) Support Comment This...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ann Arbor, Michigan/archive3
Minggu, 2024-11-17 07:15:10

this article is close to a keep. Why are there citations in the lead? WP:LEADCITE says they are unnecessary. Has all this information been cited in the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Alex Higgins/archive2
Senin, 2025-06-09 19:00:09

(Unless there are any statements in the lead that need citations per MOS:LEADCITE.) Images. The 1968 images were uploaded as "own work" by an editor who...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/2011 Virginia earthquake/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 16:27:56

dash used here is an en dash. Issue brought up on talk page here Read WP:LEADCITE about how the lead should generally not cite information that's also cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Indiggo/archive1
Selasa, 2022-09-13 04:14:27

in its entirety yet, but here is some advice I have: - According to WP:LEADCITE, there should be very few (if any) citations in the lead section of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Stingless bee/archive1
Kamis, 2025-07-24 01:41:36

better, move the list into a multi-column list into the article. Per WP:Leadcite, generally, avoid citations in the lead. Everything in the lead has to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Protein/1
Rabu, 2025-01-01 23:16:50

overcitation concern. The lead of the article doesn't need citations, per WP:LEADCITE, as the information is supposed to be the body of the article (and cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Citing sources
Rabu, 2026-08-05 11:18:19

living persons, should be supported by citations even in the lead. See WP:LEADCITE for more information. Shortcut WP:CONSECUTIVECITEWP:CONSECUTIVECITE Per...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Joseph Mitchell Parsons/archive1
Kamis, 2010-11-04 03:25:07

would not fail the article for that at GA. For more info on this, see WP:LEADCITE and a current conversation on the topic with regard to FA candidates. There...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive276
Minggu, 2023-02-19 00:32:00

WP:LEADCITE defers to WP:CITE and WP:RS, otherwise one could write anything in the lead section under this pretext; and in any case, WP:LEADCITE also...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/L. D. Reynolds/archive1
Senin, 2021-09-06 07:06:05

22 August 2021 (UTC) Citations in the lead are not forbidden, as per WP:LEADCITE. The reason I asked for one for the particular point mentioned above was...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Seabuckthorn
Senin, 2020-11-30 10:40:32

problem. WP:LEADCITE does indeed say "Some material ... must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned", but LEADCITE specifies that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Prince Romerson/archive1
Minggu, 2017-02-05 06:10:02

likely to be challenged by a reader encountering it the first time, see WP:LEADCITE. I don't think your lede is controversial in anyway, so I would argue that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Untitled from Marilyn Monroe by Andy Warhol/archive1
Minggu, 2018-11-25 14:26:46

used in the lead section if the material is repeated in the body. See WP:Leadcite. "Andy Warhol | Marilyn Monroe 22 | 1967 | Hamilton-Selway". Hamilton-Selway...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Dragon Warrior/archive1
Rabu, 2022-03-23 20:53:27

the new rewording need a citation still? I would prefer not to per WP:LEADCITE if it doesn't.陣内Jinnai 01:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC) "Dragon Warrior is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Misty Copeland/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 01:43:17

/ WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Per WP:LEADCITE, most if not all of these cites should be in the article body, but not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Warsaw Uprising (1794)/archive2
Senin, 2022-04-04 23:30:51

the article. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 03:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC) per WP:LEADCITE, he lead normally doesn't require inline citations, as all that information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment
Senin, 2026-07-13 10:58:11

2019 GAR. There are citations in the lead, which should be removed per WP:LEADCITE. (Fixed. Y) The final paragraph of Elevator video is an WP:MNA and reads...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Texas A&M University/archive2
Kamis, 2022-05-19 07:06:34

should be in the body and thus isn't needed in the lead at all per WP:LEADCITE. They're both from the university, one appears to be a dead version of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Tiger II
Senin, 2009-11-30 04:34:29

paragraphs, should be carefully sourced as appropriate..." Hohum (talk) WP:LEADCITE states that, basically, if everything in the lead is covered and cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Final Fantasy VI/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-28 04:54:00

expanded. There are also refs in the lead, which is unnecessary as per WP:LEADCITE. Done. 16:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC) The third paragraph of the Gameplay...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles/RFC on lead guideline for medicine-related articles
Selasa, 2025-09-23 19:36:04

wording of this nature, yet the word "mandatory" does not occur there. MOS:LEADCITE says: Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Indian National Army/archive3
Minggu, 2022-05-15 21:33:29

September 2015 (UTC) Comments Why so many citations in the lead? See WP:LEADCITE Generally overlinked - some terms are linked more than once in a single...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-12-02/Op-ed
Sabtu, 2026-05-30 22:23:10

that you are probably correct on this point. I made you aware that per WP:LEADCITE, facts are sourced in the main body of an article rather than the lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Richard Raaphorst/archive1
Sabtu, 2026-08-01 18:41:14

is nothing wrong with having citations in the lede, I would follow WP:LEADCITE, but this is only a recommendation. It is strange though that certain information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive2
Kamis, 2019-08-22 21:08:43

Looking at you, kid 18:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Please try and comply with WP:LEADCITE. Introduce Nikkhil Advani with his full name linked somewhere under the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/John M Wolfson
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:19:20

what I believed to be spurious accusations of failed verification and LEADCITE (in the opposite manner of how I interpreted it); the other party would...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of heads of state of Argentina/archive1
Sabtu, 2021-12-25 11:45:43

I do assume the lead needs to be referenced better if I am judging WP:LEADCITE correctly. Afro (Talk) 04:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC) I've fixed the triumvirate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Real Adventures of Jonny Quest/archive5
Selasa, 2023-03-14 05:16:42

also think most of those citations in the lead could be removed per WP:LEADCITE.陣内Jinnai 23:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC) Sounds good; implemented all concerns...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Siege of Kimberley
Selasa, 2023-04-04 02:21:11

number of A class articles do not have cited leads. Having said this WP:LEADCITE also states that citations can be added to the lead. — AustralianRupert...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of numbered roads in Kawartha Lakes, Ontario/archive2
Senin, 2023-02-27 22:27:35

I haven't actually checked this article, but note that according to WP:LEADCITE, the lead can either be uncited or cited, as long as the convention is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive447
Rabu, 2022-06-15 00:04:57

jab_row_in_Karnataka. [2].2 (Unrelated to other diff) Explained at MOS:LEADCITE [3] (Unrelated to other diff) see Template:Current/doc#Guidelines [4] (Unrelated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cymmer Colliery explosion/archive1
Rabu, 2020-07-08 07:06:11

be) a summary of the main article, where the information is cited. MOS:LEADCITE and MOS:LEADREL indicate quotations may be used. IMO, the quotations of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Little Nemo (1911 film)/archive1
Selasa, 2026-01-20 22:27:49

06:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Source review - spotchecks not done Per WP:LEADCITE, direct quotes should be cited in the lead, even if they're repeated in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wings for My Flight/archive1
Minggu, 2016-06-19 07:12:28

to avoid redundancy, per WP:LEADCITE. However, WP:BURDEN specifically states that all quotations should be cited. LEADCITE advises us that a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
Sabtu, 2022-03-12 21:02:28

any tools. Done.--TaerkastUA (Talk) 10:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC) *per WP:LEADCITE, we don't need those extra citations in the intro paragraph. Several of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive452
Minggu, 2022-06-05 18:38:09

that was long-term stable content), but that is now given an explicit LEADCITE. So I still don't understand what your good-faith objection might possibly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/December 2009
Minggu, 2009-12-27 01:27:05

I haven't actually checked this article, but note that according to WP:LEADCITE, the lead can either be uncited or cited, as long as the convention is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sailor Moon/1
Selasa, 2022-05-17 11:48:56

article. I don't know why references in the lead would be removed, as per WP:LEADCITE (part of WP:LEAD) the lead has the same citation requirements as the rest...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive425
Jumat, 2023-04-21 22:48:49

Diffs of the user's reverts: 15:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC) "/* top */ WP:LEADCITE" 13:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC) "/* Health, illness, and death */ not improvements"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive50
Selasa, 2025-08-12 05:53:04

others quoted WP:NONENG. Another policy-based argument that was made was WP:LEADCITE which says: "Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive360
Rabu, 2026-02-18 12:00:09

Therapeutics #Over-referencing at 02:33, 8 February 2018. I made clear that WP:LEADCITE gives guidance on referencing in the lead. I certainly do not accept that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates
Minggu, 2026-08-09 01:15:59

The claim doesn't seem so controversial that it would need it under WP:LEADCITE. "The rat's dark fur is darkest" repetitive. Is there a synonym we can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Jab Tak Hai Jaan/archive1
Selasa, 2023-03-14 04:28:27

references in the lead, unless it is a very tall claim or a quote. Read WP: LEADCITE. Done: Moved references to somewhere else. "The film features Shah Rukh...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive268
Rabu, 2026-02-18 11:53:18

citations in the lead (which contradicts the far wider consensus that WP:LEADCITE represents) or whatever else, but they do not exist outside the confines...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive380
Jumat, 2024-06-21 02:45:03

important to retain it, I'd suggest raising it on the talk page. Citing MOS:LEADCITE is in no way an exception to the 3RR, either. --slakr\ talk / 03:34, 18...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive461
Rabu, 2025-09-24 00:59:28

13 November 2022 (UTC) noex I also think it might be a good idea to WP:LEADCITE notwithstanding, cite that in the intro or add it somewhere in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/November 2010
Selasa, 2010-11-30 01:22:30

I do assume the lead needs to be referenced better if I am judging WP:LEADCITE correctly. Afro (Talk) 04:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC) I've fixed the triumvirate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Staten Island Railway/archive2
Kamis, 2020-02-06 22:00:02

Island Railway. I see MOS issues also, per WP:FA?.2, regarding both WP:LEADCITE and MOS:SANDWICH. These points are certainly easier to rectify than the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive367
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 23:46:34

this is not true; the source is in the body of the article, and per WP:LEADCITE it does not need to be repeated at the start of the article. These points...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive343
Senin, 2025-08-11 00:08:31

and lead sections are not exempt from the verifiability policy. see WP:LEADCITE" 22:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC) "WP:BOLDAVOID" 22:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC) "Undid...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William M. Branham/archive1
Senin, 2018-07-23 12:19:43

June 2018 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE - things like quotations should be cited even in the lead That is a rather strict reading of LEADCITE, it says cites are neither...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive283
Sabtu, 2026-07-04 19:14:54

omitted cites in the lead. But this close requires them even though WP:LEADCITE says "The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Trust Issues/archive1
Selasa, 2026-03-10 05:05:46

opinion. Also, the quote would require a source even in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. I suggest mentioning the details of the critical reception and commercial...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/July 2011
Senin, 2011-08-01 04:16:48

sources in the body. Timbouctou (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC) I agree, WP:LEADCITE does provide for omission of citations in the lead on "case by case basis"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive745
Rabu, 2026-06-17 04:38:00

all citations from the lead per WP:LEADCITE. I reverted the etymology edit (User:JimWae also reverted the leadcite edit) as I felt it was undue weight...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Arrow (Israeli missile)
Kamis, 2023-02-09 14:21:29

A-Class criteria. If anything it's perhaps over-cited (see WP:CITE and WP:LEADCITE; unless an article comes under WP:BIO, I see no need for extensive citations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Of Human Feelings/archive5
Jumat, 2023-02-10 04:23:21

written and cited in the body, citations are redundant in the lead (WP:LEADCITE) 3) semicolons before conjunctions like and is an unnecessary, outdated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ton That Dinh/archive1
Rabu, 2025-09-24 05:39:11

who is a living person. Given the high standard expected in BLPs, and WP:LEADCITE, I am concerned about there being no cites in the lead for the following:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Exelon Pavilions/archive1
Minggu, 2022-05-22 03:55:26

and support. I note that even when the "no refs" lead syle is used, WP:LEADCITE still requires refs for quotations, material likely to be challenged (usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/G. Wayne Clough/archive2
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:55:03

properly covered in the main text, they need no citations in the lead (WP:LEADCITE). That has been fixed. Disavian (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Talking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/British Airways
Minggu, 2018-10-14 19:43:33

include references if the material is cited later in the article (see WP:LEADCITE). Most of the information in the lead isn't controversial (such as the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Serpin/archive1
Sabtu, 2024-11-02 00:13:42

direct quotations. See WP:LEADCITE. Aa77zz (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC) I must admit, I was unaware of the WP:LEADCITE policy! The citations are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive718
Senin, 2026-07-06 02:00:47

problems and citing part of a policy and ignoring other relevant parts (P:LEADCITE part of WP:LEAD case in point)? Your claim that "the reliability of these...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1110
Minggu, 2026-02-08 22:33:40

there are already so many unnecessary links cluttering up the lead (MOS:LEADCITE), I just don't know why Keystone18 wants to go to war over this except...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1091
Selasa, 2026-06-09 19:49:58

it's valid to remove it. Similarly, if a source can be removed, as per WP:LEADCITE, I've always assumed it's not valid to simply restore it with a sarcastic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/November 2015
Senin, 2015-11-30 06:03:53

possible, could this be sourced? Unless you think it's unnecessary per WP:LEADCITE, I would cite them. I can't find any source that states this explicitly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1112
Senin, 2026-02-09 18:53:07

layout of the article and also the lead does not always need refs (MOS:LEADCITE). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC) I just reverted...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive910
Sabtu, 2026-07-11 09:05:27

13 January 2016 (UTC) Sort of correct, but that's not exactly what WP:LEADCITE says. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC) User has been...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1086
Kamis, 2025-11-13 18:37:55

is this very necessary edit to remove 17 citations from the lead per WP:LEADCITE. [56] In addition, this is the same RfC that Cornerstonepicker canvassed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive303
Sabtu, 2026-07-04 20:38:37

cited as long as what the text says is elsewhere in the article per MOS:LEADCITE. But the text in general was blatantly not a good summary of the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive932
Sabtu, 2026-05-09 20:21:19

can't be used for Lind's views), his inclusion in the lead violates WP:LEADCITE and you're only trying to include it there to further violate the strong...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Premiere (The O.C.)/archive2
Minggu, 2022-05-22 02:08:18

opinion.) -Widened – sgeureka t•c 18:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Per WP:LEADCITE and general FAC practice, the lead generally repeats information that appears...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive975
Senin, 2026-02-09 00:23:02

the best-known recordings, and sources aren't needed in the lead (see WP:LEADCITE). If you see someone is in the middle of expanding an article, and they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Misterioso (Thelonious Monk album)/archive1
Minggu, 2017-07-23 07:56:44

the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body..." (WP:LEADCITE). Dan56 (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Featured articles are supposed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Glen P. Robinson/archive2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:39:03

pet hate of mine. They're not against the FA criteria per se, but per WP:LEADCITE, they shouldn't be there if not necessary (because the lead is intended...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive284
Kamis, 2021-04-29 06:38:42

edits. The article has benefited after Noteduck pointed to WP:ROWN and MOS:LEADCITE. I do not agree that there was a 1RR violation or that Springee is a faultless...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive365
Sabtu, 2024-02-10 22:08:17

the talk page that the edits in issue are good content. Moreover, Per LeadCite, the material has stood in the lead, and is cited in the body of the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive277
Kamis, 2022-02-24 14:12:37

often controversial, and often to the lead of an article (but it's not a LEADCITE issue; the claims are new information not sourced elsewhere in the article)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive272
Selasa, 2020-10-20 11:25:50

2020 (UTC) Contentious labels require citations, even in the lead. MOS:LEADCITE. And I will note that C&C's RfC does not address the most contentious of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Islands of the Clyde/1
Minggu, 2026-03-08 23:32:17

referenced.Pyrotec (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2026 (UTC) @Pyrotec: Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead normally does not need citations as that information should also...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive951
Jumat, 2024-10-18 02:49:10

"documentaries", and that he is a "documentarian" and "filmmaker". Per WP:LEADCITE, "The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive262
Selasa, 2023-03-21 01:33:05

cases), as is usually done on Wikipedia articles? It's allowed by MOS:LEADCITE for uncontroversial content, which a summary of well-referenced details...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive160
Selasa, 2025-09-23 23:33:47

[78]Addition of contentious material to lede without sourcing as required by WP:LEADCITE "Some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Joel S. Levine/archive1
Jumat, 2021-03-12 19:05:59

a high-quality RS, but that cite itself seems to be unnecessary per WP:LEADCITE. Ref 2 has the wrong title this RS/N discussion does not lend me with confidence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/New Albion/archive1
Rabu, 2026-06-24 03:09:49

without); Missing Publisher; Missing Year/Date As far as prose goes: Per WP:LEADCITE, the citations in the lede are not required, and some will advocate removal...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Revelation (Third Day album)/archive1
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 21:22:00

cited directly in the lede since it is contentious BLP material. See WP:LEADCITE.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 00:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Fixed, thanks for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age fabrication
Rabu, 2025-12-17 22:58:39

references if the contents are found elsewhere in the article. See MOS:LEADCITE. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC) But the contents...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Waddesdon Bequest/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:09:38

(and linked to) in the article's main body. Yes, you have the choice - WP:LEADCITE. Johnbod (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 2. In the "Fakes and revised attributions"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/May 2012
Sabtu, 2012-06-02 23:13:19

editor to add references in to those parts. Aaron • You Da One Per WP:LEADCITE references are only really needed for contentious info. Things already...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1176
Senin, 2024-04-29 10:37:46

well done. But ledes usually don't need too many citations, as per WP:LEADCITE, although it confused me when I first started editing. Professor Penguino...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Barack Obama/archive5
Minggu, 2023-02-19 13:21:01

citations in the lead have been properly removed in accordance with WP:LEADCITE. There is no actionable stability issue as I said and previous FARs concluded...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Texas A&M University/archive1
Minggu, 2025-09-07 20:13:49

my understanding is that space-grant is not particularly important. MOS:LEADCITE has not been followed; many excess citations in the lead. ”Agricultural...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/February 2009
Jumat, 2011-04-08 09:31:35

years, I feel that citing fifteen refs on one fact to be overkill per WP:LEADCITE and visually unappealing/distracting per WP:FL?'s Cr.6. Comments are welcome...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/November 2012
Kamis, 2012-11-22 01:30:53

in the lead is sourced in the article body, it doesn't matter, per WP:LEADCITE. Et3rnal 15:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Yes it does, but as you can see from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1172
Sabtu, 2023-01-07 14:07:56

(talk) 02:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC) @Gronk Oz I think it is stated at MOS:LEADCITE. Jolly1253 (talk) 02:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC) See...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Shadow of the Colossus/archive1
Rabu, 2022-03-23 07:15:57

why is the fact that the game was created by the people who made Ico WP:LEADCITE worthy, but not that it's a spiritual successor?) A few bits n' bobs don't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/BBC Sports Personality of the Year Coach Award
Jumat, 2023-03-10 20:42:42

skipped the redirect. Needs a reference. Comment It already is. Per WP:LEADCITE, when the lead is summarising information in the body of the article (ref...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 50
Kamis, 2025-01-16 21:21:50

(UTC) WP:LEADCITE says to use citations when needed in the lead just as in any other section. Anomie⚔ 11:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC) From WP:LEADCITE: The necessity...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/December 2008
Kamis, 2009-07-09 03:29:29

skipped the redirect. Needs a reference. Comment It already is. Per WP:LEADCITE, when the lead is summarising information in the body of the article (ref...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/September 2017
Minggu, 2017-10-01 06:33:02

only information without references comes from the table, and per MOS:LEADCITE, information that is in the lead, but is cited in the main body of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/September 2015
Selasa, 2015-09-29 04:19:12

September 2015 (UTC) A few sentences in the lead are unreferenced. Yes, per WP:LEADCITE, this is where the information comes from the list below. Harrias talk...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/April 2021
Kamis, 2021-04-29 07:28:04

2021 (UTC) A lot of the lede requires referencing. Can you clarify? MOS:LEADCITE This lede is a recap of the rest of the article, which is extensively sourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/June 2015
Senin, 2015-06-29 08:07:00

2010." Needs source. That's all sourced in the body of the article. WP:LEADCITE says not to add references to information that is sourced in the body....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/August 2018
Sabtu, 2018-09-01 07:25:43

they summarize the tables (i.e. it's already cited in the body per MOS:LEADCITE), but the rest should have citations to reliable sources. Outstanding Comic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Men's T20 World Cup tournaments/archive1
Sabtu, 2025-06-07 07:26:20

article, thus don't have much citations as they're not mandatory per MOS:LEADCITE. Most ESPNcricinfo sources uses the {{ESPNcricinfo 2}} citation template...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2013 August 18
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:20:55

August 2013 (UTC) @Cyphoidbomb: The Ali article is a different case. Per WP:LEADCITE, we don't have to cite statements in the opening paragraph if they're cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/March 2009
Sabtu, 2010-01-23 09:42:01

the lead as they are simply summarising what's in the article, see WP:LEADCITE. However, there isn't really a hard and fast rule, some FL-class discogs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Florence Fuller/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 14:54:37

spotchecks not done Quotes should be cited immediately in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE Done. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Is there a page...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of national anthems/archive1
Minggu, 2025-09-14 03:31:40

Mattximus (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Delist per all. There are plenty of LEADCITEs. The "Key" table can likely be merged in the main table if it isn't crufty...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The High Windows (album)/archive1
Senin, 2026-01-19 00:56:02

Standardise date form used per MOS:NUM No need for citations in lead per WP:LEADCITE Add the publisher/work in some sources, like source 20 Not necessary, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Parks and Recreation episodes/archive1
Minggu, 2025-07-20 07:26:51

(talk) 21:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC) I think it’s the same principle as MOS:leadcite Olliefant (she/her) 08:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Except that this isn't in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Petitcodiac River/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:41:12

per WP:LEADCITE you shouldn't really have to cite much, if anything, in it. Ryan Norton 19:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Same concern (WP:LEADCITE) was brought...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2010 Nobel Peace Prize/archive3
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 19:54:40

be placed in the main text. Please see WP:V, WP:LEAD and especially WP:LEADCITE for more information. In the actual lead i would cite all quotes (or rephrase...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2014 January 29
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:28:21

cited. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE is the specific section. CTF83! 11:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 187
Jumat, 2026-07-10 22:38:25

challenged" means, the various places where citations are not needed at all (WP:LEADCITE) and the philosophical debate of WP:You don't need to cite that the sky...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 162
Rabu, 2025-09-24 01:38:53

an improvement on stale forks, though some have complained that (per WP:LEADCITE and established practice on the Main Page) they omit references etc. Reversions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Stephen Hawking/archive1
Kamis, 2025-09-04 20:45:55

OH&S issue. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Comment - per WP:LEADCITE, that string of nine cites in the lead should probably move elsewhere or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 66
Kamis, 2026-02-12 23:17:13

lead as a guideline. Arlen22 (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 16:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC) In order to create...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 163
Jumat, 2024-05-10 12:54:52

part of the article, and prove their value and validity there (see MOS:LEADCITE). To return to the Noam Chomsky-examle: you will find hardly any references...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian/archive2
Selasa, 2020-07-21 07:07:27

citations in the lead even though it's not included in the body – see MOS:LEADCITE. Unfortunately, that one citation is the only way to prove it was the fifth...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 150
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 01:09:55

lead sections have the strongest verifiability requirements as per MOS:LEADCITE, and ever-changing statistics are unlikely to be recorded in a reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aitraaz/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 02:54:13

material. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC) Lede * As per WP:LEADCITE, there are no sources and that makes the lead section look clean. The same...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jennifer Lawrence/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-07 13:38:41

lead so you don't have to repeat it (this one of the exceptions to WP:LEADCITE) Not sure that's really a convention, but it looks incomplete to not have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 52
Minggu, 2026-02-22 10:56:03

guideline. In particular, that is definitely not the lesson that the WP:LEADCITE subsection wants you to learn. It makes me wonder if you have read the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Exhumation of Richard III of England/archive1
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:34:08

There is a citation in the lead for the injuries to the skull. Per WP:LEADCITE, I think this is something that could be better explained in the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Scattered disc
Senin, 2025-12-15 20:14:01

Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC) According to WP:LEADCITE, "Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Cefnllys Castle/archive1
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 21:08:26

it has a section on recurrences?  Done Partly done - I'm aware of MOS:LEADCITE and had been trying to limit refs in the lead, I included those three citations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2022 July 24
Senin, 2022-08-01 08:21:39

also cited in the following paragraph. It's been my understanding of MOS:LEADCITE that facts cited in the body of the article do not require a separate citation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Rei Ayanami/archive1
Senin, 2025-09-15 10:17:32

popularity polls, or anything quoting anno's words) in the lede, per MOS:LEADCITE. will reply with more if i have any ideas :3 astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 19:26...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Megadeth/archive2
Rabu, 2014-08-13 22:38:04

Claims like such should include citations since it is challengeable (See WP:LEADCITE). "prominent" or "common"? " MTV has refused to play two of the band's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Monte Carlo localization/archive1
Senin, 2024-09-30 22:36:13

is to not use cites at all in the lead unless absolutely necessary; WP:LEADCITE is a bit more flexible. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I will...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Landis' Missouri Battery
Rabu, 2020-07-08 07:15:12

nitpicky, is welcome. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Per MOS:LEADCITE avoid citing citations in the lead. Done I'd like to see more info in the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1069
Jumat, 2025-07-18 23:57:06

summarizes information for which sources are given later in the article WP:LEADCITE says: Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Religion of the Shang dynasty/archive1
Rabu, 2025-09-24 22:45:49

and for the same reason, it's unusual to use citations in the lead (MOS:LEADCITE) except for direct quotations and things that are likely to be edit-warred...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Rotating locomotion in living systems/archive2
Jumat, 2026-06-19 08:09:48

for some of the statements lacking them; others I think fall under WP:LEADCITE or WP:BLUE. Are there any particular statements remaining that you think...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Poetry/archive3
Minggu, 2020-04-12 07:15:59

should either be expanded on in the lead or left out. There are also LEADCITEs which while not fatal with the criteria are not needed given that they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2022 May 30
Jumat, 2022-06-03 08:53:12

doesn't require citations if they are within the body of an article WP:LEADCITE. --GloMonsterTalk 18:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC) GloMonster Your edit appeared...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/.hack (video game series)/archive2
Senin, 2023-01-30 19:06:59

different schools of thought about redundancy of citations in the lead (see WP:LEADCITE) with the gist being that only controversial claims NEED to be cited. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/India/archive4
Selasa, 2026-08-04 09:25:19

IDLI apply, also in addressing LEADCITE. I did find some problems (some kindly addressed), For example: MOS:LEADCITE is pretty much required for FAs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trees (poem)/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:03:45

While I doubt there will be a challenge, I thought it necessary. Per WP:LEADCITE: The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Josephine Butler/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 16:59:56

quote within a quote). I'm not a fan of citations in the lead, and as WP:LEADCITE says to only provide them for contentious material, I think we should be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Weather Machine (sculpture)/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:10:54

not done Direct quotes should be cited immediately in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Dead links...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction/archive1
Selasa, 2017-03-28 06:13:03

Shouldn't Ashley's quote at the end of the 1st paragraph be cited? WP:LEADCITE suggests that "direct quotations [in the lead] should be supported by an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive1
Kamis, 2025-09-25 05:31:40

information is in the body, references shoudn't go here (excepting WP:LEADCITE). Content summary "Meals and appetizers are discussed.[11][12]" Too short...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Citation underkill
Minggu, 2023-03-12 04:30:21

necessarily need to be sourced if the content is sourced lower; this is per WP:LEADCITE. Nightscream, I wasn't so much talking about material being completely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Macintosh/archive2
Selasa, 2022-05-17 01:37:57

summarize facts which will be sourced later on in the article. I disagree. WP:LEADCITE says there should be fewer sources, but it is not required to be devoid...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song)/archive1
Kamis, 2022-05-26 16:37:23

article. In the lead, sources should be given if using direct quotes. WP:LEADCITE says quotes "should be", not "must be" cited. The same words are used in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Into Temptation (film)/archive2
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:53:50

not contain any references. TGilmour (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE says of the lead, "material that is challenged or likely to be challenged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 207
Selasa, 2026-07-07 14:47:01

not with a quote. And while quotes are not prohibited from the lead (WP:LEADCITE) (I have used them many times), "Citations are often omitted from the lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Water fluoridation/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:10:33

of water fluoridation is complex, current, and controversial, and as WP:LEADCITE says, the article's lead therefore needs many citations. "Note that ref...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Greed (game show)/archive2
Kamis, 2021-11-11 08:08:58

don't understand why just one sentence in the lead is referenced? See MOS:LEADCITE, we should be able to move that into the main body too. Moved. --Bcschneider53...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/USAir Flight 405/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:35:37

those citations to the body would greatly improve readability. See WP:LEADCITE. Reduced from six references to two. I know you wikilink NTSB in the lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mary Kom (film)/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:44:04

of the word "film" as much as possible. This section complies with WP:LEADCITE, and that's not a concern. Plot I say the actor names are best removed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hilary Duff/1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 10:52:54

Story (2004)." Source? Source is in the main article below. As per WP:LEADCITE, citations in the Lead are minimal.Gprince007 (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2010...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Percy Jackson and the Olympians/archive1
Jumat, 2026-07-31 18:25:34

leave my comments here. Reduce the number of citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. Use {{sort}} on cells with quotation marks so they sort in order. Is there...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Spanish conquest of Petén
Sabtu, 2021-09-25 16:38:35

should appear in the body of the text (where it is already cited) - see WP:LEADCITE. If this is the case then you may be able to ditch the citation here. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:38:07

the citations in the main body and have none at all in the lead. See WP:LEADCITE. However, the policy section ought to be cited, and may be cut if this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jefferson Davis/archive2
Minggu, 2013-11-03 17:03:51

October 2013 (UTC) Quick comment: Why so many citations in the lead? See WP:LEADCITE. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC) I've removed several that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:51:50

(UTC) There is not that much exception to citing in the lead WP:LEAD, WP:LEADCITE. "You will find that uncited leads of this nature are the default expectation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Prime number/archive1
Senin, 2026-07-06 06:59:39

June 2026 (UTC) Is it possible to remove two citations a lead per MOS:LEADCITE? 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 15:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC) You ask this and simultaneously...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sigi Schmid/archive2
Minggu, 2022-05-22 03:44:04

have of the article is that there are references in the lead section. WP:LEADCITE recommends against redundant citations in the lead for things that are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)/archive2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:34:48

sourced in the body would be challenged, are these really necessary per WP:LEADCITE?--ColonelHenry (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the support...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Batik/1
Rabu, 2024-09-11 18:05:33

References in the lead should probably be moved to the article body, per MOS:LEADCITE I've extended the lead somewhat to cover the key points and moved the refs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Political parties recent changes
Selasa, 2026-03-03 02:56:12

template for ideology section, per talk suggestion(s), will follow MOS:LEADCITE, as infobox will reflect section(s) within article, alongside its reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:07:13

suitable for its talk page. I'll just refute your main points: Per WP:LEADCITE, "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment/A-Class Review
Senin, 2025-07-07 21:19:15

reliable source. Special arrangements apply to the lead section (see WP:LEADCITE). A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Requiem (Reger)/archive1
Rabu, 2022-05-04 12:49:17

trying to follow, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:51, 13 April 2016 (UTC) Per WP:LEADCITE, citations are usually discouraged from the lead unless it's citing controversial...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/European Union/2
Senin, 2023-03-13 20:40:37

the lead. Of course it's not cited; it doesn't strictly have to be. WP:LEADCITE. Anyway, there are 9 citations in the lead; you found a problem with one...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Leona Lewis/archive1
Kamis, 2026-07-02 00:26:37

editor to add references in to those parts. Aaron • You Da One Per WP:LEADCITE references are only really needed for contentious info. Things already...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:58:09

22:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Actually, you're wrong again. See Wikipedia:LEADCITE. Please educate yourself before copycating the other arguments in this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/August 2020
Jumat, 2020-08-28 09:03:38

immaterial to this review.) Here are some issues: There are too many LEADCITEs, much in common with other late-2000s FA promotions; they are not forbidden...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pat O'Keeffe/archive2
Selasa, 2026-06-23 06:05:51

2026 (UTC) Support Arconning (talk) 07:22, 29 April 2026 (UTC) A few MOS:LEADCITE violations As all three citations support either evaluative claims or direct...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Begotten (film)/archive2
Jumat, 2023-11-03 04:23:42

doesnt need to be since its cited in the main body It has to; per MOS:LEADCITE, "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sesame Street research/archive3
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:50:25

the name of the article? Fixed. Try to avoid refs in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE. The policy states that refs in the lead are determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 20
Minggu, 2020-03-29 08:30:57

only required when they support potentially contentious statements – MOS:LEADCITE); although, given the article's here at AfD, I acknowledge that the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive2
Kamis, 2025-09-25 00:46:49

none of which appear to be justified by the spirit or the letter of WP:LEADCITE. This issue is symptomatic of a larger problem in that the article has...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/John Vanbrugh/archive1
Senin, 2025-01-20 15:55:41

(talk) 23:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC) With all due respect, that's not what WP:LEADCITE says. I find this useful: "editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/White-faced spiny tree-rat/archive1
Minggu, 2026-08-09 00:35:59

The claim doesn't seem so controversial that it would need it under WP:LEADCITE. "The rat's dark fur is darkest" repetitive. Is there a synonym we can...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 28
Rabu, 2023-08-09 18:54:52

Conspiracy theory article is having some POV problems. I am trying to follow WP:LEADCITE and am supported by Mystichumwipe and Mystylplx but we have editors reverting...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cirrus cloud/archive1
Senin, 2023-02-27 22:47:51

challenged, such as claims about "tuft of hair" and "Latin for curl". (See WP:LEADCITE.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Comment (GermanJoe) Oppose...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Guy Fawkes Night/archive1
Selasa, 2024-12-24 05:33:37

life, people lit bonfires around London" would be better cited per WP:LEADCITE. The lead says "Celebrating the fact that King James I had survived the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Fifth Element/archive2
Senin, 2023-03-13 21:28:41

'support' from me. There are two cites in the lead, should not be there per WP:LEADCITE as long as the facts are cited later. Gaultier does not use the hyphen...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Epsilon Eridani/archive2
Selasa, 2024-12-31 09:21:52

of an article that is most likely to be challenged by visitors. See: WP:LEADCITE. Regards, RJH (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Fair enough, I've indicated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 47
Senin, 2026-03-02 22:23:25

to include the reference to a massacre in the lead of the article. WP:LEADCITE specifically says Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Asperger syndrome/archive4
Selasa, 2020-10-20 15:25:10

2020 (UTC) Comments by John M Wolfson I'm surprised at the amount of LEADCITEs. They're certainly not prohibited by any guideline, but modern standard...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Wood-pasture hypothesis/archive2
Sabtu, 2024-02-17 22:15:10

at a shortened first paragraph (Also, I removed the citations per MOS:LEADCITE since nothing here is likely to be challenged, as you are not making any...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sideshow Bob
Selasa, 2024-05-14 05:06:08

And the complete version of that quote is used (and cited) later. Per WP:LEADCITE: "The lead must conform to verifiability and other policies. The verifiability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Piri Reis/archive1
Rabu, 2025-10-01 07:06:41

does not because there are no inline citations in the article's lead (MOS:LEADCITE). Rjjiii (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2025 (UTC) Boats, maps, pirates, what's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/January 2015
Jumat, 2015-01-30 20:52:51

(Talk) 23:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC) I think Kailash was referring to WP:LEADCITE, which indicates that citations are generally not used in lead sections...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Amphetamine/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:58:08

necessary and makes the text cluttered and more difficult to read. See MOS:LEADCITE. There are links to common words such as: pharmaceutical, depression, obesity...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural impact of Michael Jackson (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 05:15:10

only required when they support potentially contentious statements – MOS:LEADCITE); although, given the article's here at AfD, I acknowledge that the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/British Figure Skating Championships/archive1
Selasa, 2025-05-27 07:25:31

citations be move out of the lead and into the records section per WP:LEADCITE  Done That's interesting. No one has ever brought that up before on previous...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Spot checking sources
Minggu, 2026-06-14 01:06:31

have, but do not usually require, inline citations (WP:NOTCITE and MOS:LEADCITE). Content that is unreasonable to challenge may not require a source. On...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1985 Tour de France/archive1
Rabu, 2021-03-17 07:06:01

04:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Lead Why the citation? In accordance with MOS:LEADCITE, I added that citation since this statement is not repeated anywhere in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Robert Goff, Baron Goff of Chieveley/archive1
Rabu, 2020-07-08 07:08:17

repeated, and cited, elsewhere in the body, which would be my preference, MOS:LEADCITE. But it is possible I'm wrong on this. I know it was discussed at GAR,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Menkauhor Kaiu/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 17:11:53

Iry-Hor (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC) Another point is that per WP:LEADCITE, that sentence really shouldn't have an inline citation, since it ought...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pagtatag!/archive2
Minggu, 2024-11-24 07:05:41

"identity strengthening" → quotations in lead require citation per MOS:LEADCITE "its songs explored" → its song explore "but one considered that the EP...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/First Silesian War/archive1
Rabu, 2020-01-15 07:06:13

and Austria doesn't seem controversial or challengeable according to MOS:LEADCITE. "In January 1742 the Imperial election was held at Frankfurt, where Bavarian...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism/Recent changes
Rabu, 2026-03-04 02:36:17

diffhist m Peter Mandelson 08:30 −12 Martinevans123 talk contribs (WP:LEADCITE and copy down (if needed at all?)) diffhist Fabian Society 08:27 +490 ~2026-35300-90...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2010 November 24
Selasa, 2022-03-29 01:58:16

citations are not required in the lead (generally). This is discussed at WP:LEADCITE; you'll see most featured articles on non-controversial topics have citation-free...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive1
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:35:55

all aware of the two citation conventions. I was working off Wikipedia:LEADCITE; could you point out the location of a description of these alternate lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fringe theory
Senin, 2025-11-17 12:39:06

(UTC) There is not that much exception to citing in the lead WP:LEAD, WP:LEADCITE. "You will find that uncited leads of this nature are the default expectation...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/21 (Adele album)/archive1
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 21:24:37

summarize article's content, sources in the lead are unneeded (expecting [[WP:LEADCITE|direct quotes and BLP issues). It's up to you. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 19:53, 17 May...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Electron/archive1
Senin, 2023-03-27 01:29:41

consolidated to a single cite. I cleaned up the remainder consistent with WP:LEADCITE. The artifact of starting the cite tags with the "[15]" is a function of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death)/archive5
Senin, 2023-03-06 08:00:19

wouldn't be? I replaced it with a more complete version. Is it passable? WP:LEADCITE says in part The lead must conform to verifiability and other policies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Bartow, Florida/archive1
Selasa, 2025-10-14 21:48:38

Hurricanehink (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC) Comments from Ctjf83 Per WP:LEADCITE you should remove references, as all the other info should be presented...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive140
Jumat, 2025-11-21 08:55:40

back in August you used WP:LEADCITE as one of your arguments (in BLP/N Archive 131, James O'Keefe). Why don't you think LEADCITE applies to the sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment/2011
Rabu, 2023-08-09 19:37:23

Kaito should have the references in the infobox moveed to the prose per WP:LEADCITE, but its fine for C-class. ... .陣内Jinnai 15:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Witold Pilecki
Sabtu, 2022-09-10 13:20:47

resolved. Secondly, why are there all those citations in the lede? See MOS:LEADCITE. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC) @Indy beetle Missing pages...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inner German border/archive1
Senin, 2024-12-16 14:29:24

19 October 2009 (UTC) I've had it raised on a number of mine, but WP:LEADCITE seems flexible. Excellent work. I read it through, good work.--Wehwalt...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2021
Jumat, 2021-10-01 05:53:42

22 August 2021 (UTC) Citations in the lead are not forbidden, as per WP:LEADCITE. The reason I asked for one for the particular point mentioned above was...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2021
Jumat, 2021-11-12 13:14:23

don't understand why just one sentence in the lead is referenced? See MOS:LEADCITE, we should be able to move that into the main body too. Moved. --Bcschneider53...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Drama dari Krakatau/archive1
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:55:40

quotes, or is this an actual one-word quote? If its the later, then per WP:LEADCITE you need to add in-line attribution. Direct quote. Added the ref. — Crisco...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ken "Snakehips" Johnson/archive1
Jumat, 2023-03-24 07:05:58

ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Hi ChrisTheDude, yeah, it's at MOS:LEADCITE - quotes and anything likely to be challenged. - SchroCat (talk) 16:32...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/One Direction/archive1
Sabtu, 2025-04-19 11:44:49

the lead; they should be relocated to the body where appropriate. MOS:LEADCITE Also, "hit singles"? That is a puffery word, which is not neutral MOS:PUFFERY...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Milos Raonic/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 16:33:32

down in the body of the article. However, I was previously directed to WP:LEADCITE which says "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bikini Porn/archive1
Sabtu, 2020-07-11 19:06:05

"tan lines" and its lyrics are about "letting go of your worries". Per WP:LEADCITE a citation is needed here, but this could be paraphrased with a little...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2009 September 13
Rabu, 2026-02-18 12:45:00

section too. Thanks Etrangere (talk) 06:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE has the information you seek. wodup 06:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC) I'm...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bodashtart/archive1
Senin, 2021-02-22 06:24:50

facts so contentious that they are “likely to be challenged” (per MOS:LEADCITE)? ✓ Omission error. The facts are referenced in the body. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1920–39)/archive3
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:41:19

only information without references comes from the table, and per MOS:LEADCITE, information that is in the lead, but is cited in the main body of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2013 October 24
Jumat, 2023-04-21 22:43:54

TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Also, per WP:LEADCITE, the lead section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Bharat Ratna/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 16:34:37

sex. Per WP:LEADCITE, this needs in-line attribution. I have not provided in-line citations in the lead per following mention at WP:LEADCITE. "Because the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dementia with Lewy bodies/archive1
Senin, 2020-06-01 07:06:33

without citations. Is there a reason for doing it differently here? See MOS:LEADCITE (The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 04:48:57

October 2014 (UTC) @Fangz:The lede is cited later in the body text, per WP:LEADCITE. The reviews are referenced in full citations in the article. The other...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beta-Hydroxy beta-methylbutyric acid/archive4
Sabtu, 2018-03-24 06:09:12

their preference for no lead citations. Neither the FA criteria, nor MOS:LEADCITE, say "don't fully cite the lead" or "don't cite every lead sentence". But...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Packers sweep/archive1
Rabu, 2022-05-04 12:49:41

this as a controversial fact that warrants a citation in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. Is that all you are looking for, a citation to back-up the naming of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female privilege
Selasa, 2026-01-06 18:53:23

22:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Actually, you're wrong again. See Wikipedia:LEADCITE. Please educate yourself before copycating the other arguments in this...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/M-theory/archive1
Kamis, 2024-09-05 22:08:43

notice, but I feel this statement would still warrant citing under WP:LEADCITE. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Fixed. Polytope24 (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tornado outbreak of February 12, 1945/archive1
Jumat, 2024-07-05 07:05:44

it gets very confusing if some parts of the lead sentences rely on WP:LEADCITE and others on the cites. Someone will have to recheck #1. Jo-Jo Eumerus...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Post-classical history/archive2
Kamis, 2022-11-24 06:12:48

section etc. Refs in the lead are all unneeded and unnecessary, see WP:LEADCITE Lot of missing refs in the Climate section The Approaches last doesn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/God of War (series)/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:39:17

necessary? The reference at the end of the lead can be removed, per WP:LEADCITE. All points addressed. As per the last point about the reference, that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Derek Jeter/archive4
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:22:08

July 2012 (UTC) Comment: There are a lot of citations in the lead. Per WP:LEADCITE, it seems that these citations are redundant as the info is already backed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 75
Senin, 2023-01-30 17:34:43

had been patrolling the article I would have likely commented on the MOS:LEADCITE which was, in my assessment, WP:OVERCITE. The citations which have been...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kent Haruf/archive1
Selasa, 2025-08-26 19:05:23

mentioned in the body. The pronouncation one can be kept. Not done: Per MOS:LEADCITE, direct quotations always require a citation. "Haruf and Koon separated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Smoking on My Ex Pack/archive1
Kamis, 2023-07-20 07:05:34

here in the lead we have "sad girl" and "aggressive" unattended to MOS:LEADCITE says this is completely redundant when the information in the lead is cited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inauguration of Barack Obama/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:52:21

Comments Some of the citations in the Lede can be removed or moved, per WP:LEADCITE The WP:LEAD should either be fully cited or fully uncited. I have to add...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)/archive3
Minggu, 2026-02-22 08:21:53

in the lead. --Efe (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Care to read WP:LEADCITE? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC) "critics have compared...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pipe organ/archive2
Rabu, 2022-03-23 19:12:52

for all quotations." I think the idea is sort of like the idea behind WP:LEADCITE. However the point is moot for this example since the main article is not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Saint Francis Receiving the Stigmata (van Eyck)/archive1
Jumat, 2024-12-13 08:20:45

30 December 2014 (UTC) The lead doesn't need those citations, per WP:LEADCITE Debatable; but there are probably inconsistent levels of citation. Either...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Richard Wagner/archive2
Selasa, 2025-09-09 16:43:50

Wagner himself called some of his later works, 'music dramas')". Per WP:LEADCITE: "direct quotations ... must be provided with an inline citation every...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/2009/Failed
Rabu, 2010-10-27 09:47:59

any tools. Done.--TaerkastUA (Talk) 10:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC) *per WP:LEADCITE, we don't need those extra citations in the intro paragraph. Several of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Peer review/Archive 5
Sabtu, 2022-05-07 11:42:32

always have conversions (Template:Convert is helpful for this). Per WP:LEADCITE, if statements in the lead are included in the article below, then they...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/October 2020
Sabtu, 2020-10-31 05:35:07

for some reason; definitely too many There a substantial amount of WP:LEADCITE, and the lead in general seems far too short, especially when compared...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international goals scored by Bobby Charlton/archive1
Kamis, 2022-03-10 04:29:29

September 2015 (UTC) A few sentences in the lead are unreferenced. Yes, per WP:LEADCITE, this is where the information comes from the list below. Harrias talk...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Belton House/archive1
Rabu, 2025-09-24 05:16:25

the library in the academic literature over the past decade [2] [3] WP:LEADCITE issues Severe need for additional citations or trimming of uncited material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of Roman and Byzantine domes/archive1
Jumat, 2022-05-20 16:07:00

incorporate. AmateurEditor (talk) 01:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC) Please look at WP:LEADCITE as well. Also, I'm not "challenging" your phraseology. But it seems to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/March 2020
Rabu, 2026-06-03 11:31:28

Spengouli (talk) 18:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)( Posted in spite of the MOS:LEADCITE problem the sourcing has introduced. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:42, 30 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lisa Simpson/archive2
Sabtu, 2022-03-05 22:20:25

(and believe me, they exist). Does the citation hurt anything? Per WP:LEADCITE "Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beta-Hydroxy beta-methylbutyric acid/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:56:15

further supporting opposition: 1. Lede overciting and overquoting: MOS:LEADCITE and throughout the article, WP:CITEKILL 2. Sources on muscle wasting and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 486
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 08:34:26

content in the lead. More detailed guidance on this issue can be found at WP:LEADCITE. Direct quotations and controversial assertions should be referenced in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Edward the Martyr/archive1
Sabtu, 2024-01-27 07:05:28

now, but for the "obnoxious teenager" quote at the end of the lead, MOS:LEADCITE would want a ref for this. Easily fixed: just copy-paste {{sfn|Watson|2021|p=19}}...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/George Town, Penang/archive1
Selasa, 2024-03-12 07:05:53

any more inconsistencies that exist and if this is consistent with MOS:LEADCITE.hundenvonPG (talk) 13:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC) (t · c) buidhe 04:55, 13...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Yongle Emperor/archive1
Sabtu, 2026-06-13 06:06:06

unavailable for the journals. Min968 (talk) 05:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE violations Fixed. I don't like the use of bullet points for the family...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 60
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:15:10

the lead are unecessary per WP:LEADCITE Citations are permitted if statements have been challenged in the past. WP:LEADCITE says "The presence of citations...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 52
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:53:24

to be) in the article, it is not necessary to cite here (expecting WP:LEADCITE. The cast section should be like this. The infobox includes Japan release...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Rihanna discography/archive2
Rabu, 2026-03-11 21:07:15

in the lead is sourced in the article body, it doesn't matter, per WP:LEADCITE. Et3rnal 15:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Yes it does, but as you can see from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/January 2017
Rabu, 2023-02-01 04:45:10

in the lede? Hello!Zigzig20s (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE. It's cited in the body, so it doesn't need to be cited in the lead. And...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 139
Sabtu, 2025-08-02 13:39:26

something she didn't like. -- GreenC 01:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC) MOS:LEADCITE, that is sourced in the body. Determination of scientific consensus is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2011
Senin, 2011-01-31 10:55:19

have of the article is that there are references in the lead section. WP:LEADCITE recommends against redundant citations in the lead for things that are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Christ Church, Newton/archive1
Minggu, 2022-05-01 08:30:29

noteworthy rectors would also work well here to enhance the lede. Also per WP:LEADCITE, because the lede contains information that is cited below in the prose...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2020 Seattle Sounders FC season/archive1
Kamis, 2024-02-29 19:05:12

that allows for a straightforward citation, but I presume that under MOS:LEADCITE it should be fine. I'm not sure that there is a more appropriate name for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tomorrow's Pioneers/archive1
Selasa, 2025-10-21 06:57:12

lead isn't mentioned in the body The lead doesn't need to be cited per WP:LEADCITE, but I don't know if it's a FA criteria. Potentially I'll go through the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance/archive89
Sabtu, 2025-10-18 11:31:54

unprovoked I might add. --GabeMc (talk) 23:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC) From WP:LEADCITE "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or likely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mac DeMarco discography/archive2
Jumat, 2023-02-10 06:39:26

2010." Needs source. That's all sourced in the body of the article. WP:LEADCITE says not to add references to information that is sourced in the body....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/August 2016
Kamis, 2025-06-05 09:03:25

day & year in the lead section, and this seems to be ok according to MOS:LEADCITE. So although The Rambling Man is of course correct that it is a weak article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/09
Senin, 2022-05-30 20:29:04

reference - unfortunately, the situation is a bit murky because of WP:LEADCITE. HTH, Samsara 12:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC) There's a talk page discussion...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/February 2014
Minggu, 2014-03-23 19:55:25

OH&S issue. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Comment - per WP:LEADCITE, that string of nine cites in the lead should probably move elsewhere or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/October 2021
Senin, 2026-04-20 07:01:56

comments: I've referenced all of the article's prose, except the lead per WP:LEADCITE. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Comment One cn tag...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/John Oliver/archive1
Rabu, 2023-08-30 07:05:36

August 2023 (UTC) Is there a reason to include citations in the lead? (MOS:LEADCITE) (I think British-American follows from place of Birth and later citizenship...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Humphrey Bogart on stage, screen, radio and television/archive1
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 07:26:16

2021 (UTC) A lot of the lede requires referencing. Can you clarify? MOS:LEADCITE This lede is a recap of the rest of the article, which is extensively sourced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/July 2020
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 04:09:57

Dantheanimator (talk) 19:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC) @Dantheanimator: per MOS:LEADCITE: "The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
Sabtu, 2020-08-29 01:21:11

designs is relevant here. Citations, can be removed from the lead per MOS:LEADCITE providing the facts are cited elsewhere. Cite number 4 appears after 'Luftwaffe'...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Angel Aquino/archive1
Senin, 2023-07-10 07:05:46

Philippine entertainment industry. Kloyan.L (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC) MOS:LEADCITE states that citations are often omitted from the lead section as this information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the Second Temple period/archive1
Jumat, 2024-10-25 03:26:46

information in the lead doesn't appear in the body, it needs citations (see WP:LEADCITE) e.g. "Hellenistic Judaism blended both Greek and Jewish traditions." which...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/GLAAD Media Award for Outstanding Comic Book/archive1
Kamis, 2018-08-23 07:25:17

they summarize the tables (i.e. it's already cited in the body per MOS:LEADCITE), but the rest should have citations to reliable sources. Outstanding Comic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rufus Wainwright discography
Senin, 2023-02-27 22:25:08

the lead as they are simply summarising what's in the article, see WP:LEADCITE. However, there isn't really a hard and fast rule, some FL-class discogs...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2012
Selasa, 2012-07-31 00:08:10

July 2012 (UTC) Comment: There are a lot of citations in the lead. Per WP:LEADCITE, it seems that these citations are redundant as the info is already backed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2011
Rabu, 2011-11-23 22:58:49

of an article that is most likely to be challenged by visitors. See: WP:LEADCITE. Regards, RJH (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Fair enough, I've indicated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ashley Tisdale/archive4
Minggu, 2022-05-22 03:59:21

since the WP:LEAD is supposed to summarize the rest of the article (WP:LEADCITE). I'd move the citations to appropriate locations within the body. done...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Wolfmother discography/archive3
Jumat, 2023-02-10 06:51:14

already covered in the other sections (other than introduction) as WP:LEADCITE advises "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2024 East–West Line disruption/archive1
Minggu, 2026-05-03 06:05:30

[2]" this already mentioned in the body, so no need for the lead per WP:LEADCITE I mean, I thought quotes need citations everywhere and claims needed to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2016
Kamis, 2016-03-31 03:25:02

direct quotations. See WP:LEADCITE. Aa77zz (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC) I must admit, I was unaware of the WP:LEADCITE policy! The citations are...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2011
Kamis, 2011-07-28 20:56:53

challenged, such as claims about "tuft of hair" and "Latin for curl". (See WP:LEADCITE.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Comment (GermanJoe) Oppose...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2014
Minggu, 2014-03-30 00:21:53

sourced in the body would be challenged, are these really necessary per WP:LEADCITE?--ColonelHenry (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the support...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/January 2009
Minggu, 2009-02-01 00:29:19

consolidated to a single cite. I cleaned up the remainder consistent with WP:LEADCITE. The artifact of starting the cite tags with the "[15]" is a function of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2013
Senin, 2020-08-17 06:30:40

not done Direct quotes should be cited immediately in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Dead links...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/May 2022
Selasa, 2022-05-31 22:45:51

should be in the body and thus isn't needed in the lead at all per WP:LEADCITE. They're both from the university, one appears to be a dead version of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hughes Medal
Jumat, 2023-02-10 05:47:21

but if you add quotations to the lead they need a cite there too per WP:LEADCITE. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Fixed. Ironholds...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Markham's storm petrel/archive2
Kamis, 2024-02-29 19:05:39

February 2024 (UTC) Great to see this here. Uncited quote in the lead. Per WP:LEADCITE: 'The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/March 2010
Rabu, 2010-03-31 00:36:53

(and believe me, they exist). Does the citation hurt anything? Per WP:LEADCITE "Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2014
Kamis, 2014-05-01 06:49:43

the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body..." (WP:LEADCITE). Dan56 (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Featured articles are supposed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2016
Sabtu, 2016-07-30 11:59:01

down in the body of the article. However, I was previously directed to WP:LEADCITE which says "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuzuli (poet)/archive1
Rabu, 2023-08-02 01:00:39

Golden call me maybe? His work has been characterised as: I think MOS:LEADCITE would like a citation here, as we're implicitly saying that someone has...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/May 2016
Selasa, 2016-05-31 16:15:52

necessary? The reference at the end of the lead can be removed, per WP:LEADCITE. All points addressed. As per the last point about the reference, that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2011
Senin, 2011-06-27 22:29:52

life, people lit bonfires around London" would be better cited per WP:LEADCITE. The lead says "Celebrating the fact that King James I had survived the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 59
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:56:56

paragraph does need at least one reference except for lead sections (WP:LEADCITE) and plot sections of shows, books, movies, TV episodes, concerts, and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/July 2010
Minggu, 2010-08-01 07:00:42

(talk) 23:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC) With all due respect, that's not what WP:LEADCITE says. I find this useful: "editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2013
Sabtu, 2013-06-01 19:39:05

the name of the article? Fixed. Try to avoid refs in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE. The policy states that refs in the lead are determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2010
Jumat, 2010-12-31 05:39:05

also think most of those citations in the lead could be removed per WP:LEADCITE.陣内Jinnai 23:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC) Sounds good; implemented all concerns...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2008
Minggu, 2008-11-30 06:43:43

something new. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 01:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC) Support Comment This...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Glyptotherium/archive1
Minggu, 2025-04-06 19:05:11

dog", and "short-faced bears" coming from? It should be cited, per MOS:LEADCITE. – Michael Aurel (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC) Another added point:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive131
Selasa, 2023-03-21 14:28:56

are not fully supportive of what you're saying. Third, according to WP:LEADCITE: "Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2015
Rabu, 2015-04-01 01:53:46

notice, but I feel this statement would still warrant citing under WP:LEADCITE. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Fixed. Polytope24 (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2010
Jumat, 2010-10-01 07:41:18

and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC) WP:LEADCITE issues - several references in the lead either need to be removed/moved...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Downtown Line/archive1
Jumat, 2026-06-26 06:05:42

automated MRT line in Singapore" any way to include this in the body per WP:LEADCITE? Fixed. Finished initial review. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 17:35...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2014
Jumat, 2014-11-28 14:14:39

'support' from me. There are two cites in the lead, should not be there per WP:LEADCITE as long as the facts are cited later. Gaultier does not use the hyphen...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/April 2009
Senin, 2009-07-27 21:13:42

all aware of the two citation conventions. I was working off Wikipedia:LEADCITE; could you point out the location of a description of these alternate lead...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2011
Sabtu, 2011-12-24 18:07:58

in the lead. --Efe (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Care to read WP:LEADCITE? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC) "critics have compared...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/April 2020
Sabtu, 2020-04-25 22:28:35

2020 (UTC) Comments by John M Wolfson I'm surprised at the amount of LEADCITEs. They're certainly not prohibited by any guideline, but modern standard...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2009
Minggu, 2012-07-22 02:16:25

who is a living person. Given the high standard expected in BLPs, and WP:LEADCITE, I am concerned about there being no cites in the lead for the following:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2013
Senin, 2023-05-08 04:29:09

06:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Source review - spotchecks not done Per WP:LEADCITE, direct quotes should be cited in the lead, even if they're repeated in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2013
Senin, 2013-12-30 17:40:05

spotchecks not done Quotes should be cited immediately in the lead, per WP:LEADCITE Done. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC) Is there a page...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2013
Sabtu, 2013-06-01 19:42:37

Wagner himself called some of his later works, 'music dramas')". Per WP:LEADCITE: "direct quotations ... must be provided with an inline citation every...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2010
Minggu, 2018-02-25 02:10:14

and support. I note that even when the "no refs" lead syle is used, WP:LEADCITE still requires refs for quotations, material likely to be challenged (usually...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2017
Sabtu, 2017-04-01 05:39:56

Shouldn't Ashley's quote at the end of the 1st paragraph be cited? WP:LEADCITE suggests that "direct quotations [in the lead] should be supported by an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2009
Minggu, 2009-03-01 06:35:29

And the complete version of that quote is used (and cited) later. Per WP:LEADCITE: "The lead must conform to verifiability and other policies. The verifiability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2009
Minggu, 2009-11-01 06:56:15

19 October 2009 (UTC) I've had it raised on a number of mine, but WP:LEADCITE seems flexible. Excellent work. I read it through, good work.--Wehwalt...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2014
Rabu, 2014-02-26 22:19:38

quotes, or is this an actual one-word quote? If its the later, then per WP:LEADCITE you need to add in-line attribution. Direct quote. Added the ref. — Crisco...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2008
Selasa, 2008-09-30 08:20:48

Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC) According to WP:LEADCITE, "Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2018
Selasa, 2018-07-31 21:00:08

June 2018 (UTC) See WP:LEADCITE - things like quotations should be cited even in the lead That is a rather strict reading of LEADCITE, it says cites are neither...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/British European Airways Flight 548/archive2
Rabu, 2026-01-21 17:57:12

*Yes, I have just found that guideline as well, the direct shortcut is WP:LEADCITE. It would be a matter then of determining what is likely to be contentious...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2008
Kamis, 2016-03-17 15:54:44

Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 09:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC) This is addressed in WP:LEADCITE. Many great leads have no citations at all. Plasticup T/C 14:48, 10 July...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Assessment/2008/Promoted
Kamis, 2011-01-20 03:23:34

uncited (unless there is a contentious fact that needs it). Please see WP:LEADCITE for further informattion. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2017
Selasa, 2017-01-31 20:44:34

material. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC) Lede * As per WP:LEADCITE, there are no sources and that makes the lead section look clean. The same...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 66
Sabtu, 2022-04-09 09:58:33

the lead also needs to be rid of most or not all of its citations per WP:LEADCITE.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Article (edit | visual edit...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2017
Rabu, 2017-03-01 06:58:24

likely to be challenged by a reader encountering it the first time, see WP:LEADCITE. I don't think your lede is controversial in anyway, so I would argue that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2014
Jumat, 2014-08-29 20:53:23

Claims like such should include citations since it is challengeable (See WP:LEADCITE). "prominent" or "common"? " MTV has refused to play two of the band's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/May 2020
Senin, 2020-06-01 06:49:53

without citations. Is there a reason for doing it differently here? See MOS:LEADCITE (The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 45
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:51:19

article. I don't know why references in the lead would be removed, as per WP:LEADCITE (part of WP:LEAD) the lead has the same citation requirements as the rest...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2015
Minggu, 2015-03-01 04:55:44

There is a citation in the lead for the injuries to the skull. Per WP:LEADCITE, I think this is something that could be better explained in the article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment/2009
Rabu, 2010-10-27 09:47:59

any tools. Done.--TaerkastUA (Talk) 10:54, 18 October 2009 (UTC) *per WP:LEADCITE, we don't need those extra citations in the intro paragraph. Several of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 47
Kamis, 2020-06-04 20:51:32

Story (2004)." Source? Source is in the main article below. As per WP:LEADCITE, citations in the Lead are minimal.Gprince007 (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2010...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Assessment/2008
Kamis, 2011-01-20 03:23:31

uncited (unless there is a contentious fact that needs it). Please see WP:LEADCITE for further informattion. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/December 2008
Kamis, 2009-01-01 03:54:07

citations in the lead have been properly removed in accordance with WP:LEADCITE. There is no actionable stability issue as I said and previous FARs concluded...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2020
Sabtu, 2020-08-01 06:27:40

citations in the lead even though it's not included in the body – see MOS:LEADCITE. Unfortunately, that one citation is the only way to prove it was the fifth...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2015
Selasa, 2015-06-30 00:28:05

(and linked to) in the article's main body. Yes, you have the choice - WP:LEADCITE. Johnbod (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC) 2. In the "Fakes and revised attributions"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive259
Senin, 2026-04-13 06:50:19

having the source the lede. --MASEM (t) 13:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC) MOS:LEADCITE is depressingly unhelpful as to whether citations in the lead are a good...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/December 2021
Minggu, 2022-01-02 02:41:38

my understanding is that space-grant is not particularly important. MOS:LEADCITE has not been followed; many excess citations in the lead. ”Agricultural...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2015
Sabtu, 2015-08-01 06:53:25

a road" – quotations in the lead should have inline citations per MOS:LEADCITE (or rephrase into your own words) Guadeloupe – the first mention (in Preparations)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2018
Sabtu, 2018-03-24 09:45:11

their preference for no lead citations. Neither the FA criteria, nor MOS:LEADCITE, say "don't fully cite the lead" or "don't cite every lead sentence". But...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2018
Sabtu, 2018-12-01 06:53:18

this as a controversial fact that warrants a citation in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE. Is that all you are looking for, a citation to back-up the naming of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Singapore MRT stations/archive1
Senin, 2026-06-01 06:26:14

unsourced but follows from the rest of the list in the combined sense of MOS:LEADCITE and WP:CALC (or just as a direct calc from the system map ref 10). Yeah...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2020
Kamis, 2020-01-30 22:27:58

and Austria doesn't seem controversial or challengeable according to MOS:LEADCITE. "In January 1742 the Imperial election was held at Frankfurt, where Bavarian...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/August 2014
Rabu, 2014-08-27 20:35:14

Scottdoesntknow (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Yikes! Please see WP:LEADCITE—citations in the lead are discouraged except in special cases. The density...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2008
Senin, 2009-10-05 11:57:50

a line 18:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC) I am not seeing your point at WP:LEADCITE in terms a policy that citations clutter leads. Thanks for the weasel pointer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Archive
Minggu, 2013-04-07 23:58:40

include references if the material is cited later in the article (see WP:LEADCITE). Most of the information in the lead isn't controversial (such as the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/November 2009
Selasa, 2009-12-01 08:03:07

expanded. There are also refs in the lead, which is unnecessary as per WP:LEADCITE. Done. 16:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC) The third paragraph of the Gameplay...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2009
Kamis, 2009-10-01 07:43:25

are my concerns: The lead contains refs which is unnecessary as per WP:LEADCITE if the information is cited in the body, which it is. Common terms and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/August 2013
Minggu, 2021-02-07 02:07:25

While I doubt there will be a challenge, I thought it necessary. Per WP:LEADCITE: The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/May 2021
Sabtu, 2021-05-29 04:53:59

Most, if not all, of the citations in the lede should be removed per WP:LEADCITE. Those are the most glaring big picture issues I see. ~ HAL333 21:34, 25...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/March 2021
Minggu, 2021-03-28 07:37:53

a high-quality RS, but that cite itself seems to be unnecessary per WP:LEADCITE. Ref 2 has the wrong title this RS/N discussion does not lend me with confidence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 61
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:20:23

re-write in order to meet the "well written" part of the criteria. Per WP:LEADCITE, the lead doesn't need to be sourced and would be better off being merged...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2008/Promoted
Senin, 2015-01-05 16:39:09

a line 18:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC) I am not seeing your point at WP:LEADCITE in terms a policy that citations clutter leads. Thanks for the weasel pointer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/2008
Jumat, 2010-08-27 13:09:45

the lead general so that citations in it would not be necessary, per WP:LEADCITE. All information in the lead section is now cited in other sections of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dacrydium cupressinum/archive1
Senin, 2025-08-11 19:05:17

doesn't have citations in the lede for consistency. See WP:LEADLENGTH, WP:LEADCITE. Some of your edits are appreciated though. Apologies, I'm unsure how to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Unser Mund sei voll Lachens, BWV 110/archive2
Jumat, 2026-01-02 18:06:17

the same information is fully sourced in the body of the article, per WP:LEADCITE. I recommend removing the redundant lead citations so the summary remains...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/June 2011
Sabtu, 2011-06-25 00:48:30

information is in the body, references shoudn't go here (excepting WP:LEADCITE). Content summary "Meals and appetizers are discussed.[11][12]" Too short...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jozo Tomasevich/archive1
Rabu, 2024-09-04 07:05:43

master of scholarly skills": as this is a quote it should be cited, per MOS:LEADCITE Well, I could, but I think "The necessity for citations in a lead should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/January 2019
Kamis, 2019-01-31 05:19:57

serious issues with sources. For formatting, the article does not follow MOS:LEADCITE and WP:INFOBOXCITE. There's a bare url (ref 101), and much of the "Notable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Discontent Content/Issue 3
Jumat, 2021-06-25 10:09:23

the brink of delisting, but the issues mentioned -- accessibility, WP:LEADCITE compliance, and overreliance on primary sources -- are far from insurmountable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/December 2010
Kamis, 2010-12-30 01:19:12

different schools of thought about redundancy of citations in the lead (see WP:LEADCITE) with the gist being that only controversial claims NEED to be cited. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/October 2022
Selasa, 2022-11-08 07:00:48

contribs) 20:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC) @FAdesdae378: and that is fine per MOS:LEADCITE. Everything in the lead is sourced in the main body. The lead does not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/August 2011
Rabu, 2011-08-31 04:17:03

here are my comments No citations please in the lead. WP:LEAD. Per WP:LEADCITE some claims need refs in lead. Quotes should always have cites directly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive337
Rabu, 2023-10-04 10:00:59

if any of the material is challenged, citations will be added per MOS:LEADCITE. Popoki35 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC) ScottishFinnishRadish, Min-Premuzi...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2021
Selasa, 2021-04-20 03:18:18

04:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Lead Why the citation? In accordance with MOS:LEADCITE, I added that citation since this statement is not repeated anywhere in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article mentorship/Archive 1
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 05:18:03

might be a GA, or close to it. In terms of lead citations, please note WP:LEADCITE. It's common to not duplicate citations in the introduction, and perfectly...

Click to read more »