MOS:GENDERID states, in regard to terms relating to gender identity: Give precedence to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources...

Humor deletion discussion Miscellany for deletion Mar 2019 MOS:GENDERID and death, MOS:GENDERID Suggested change Manual of Style Discussion of the Sonia Burgess...

that relate to ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability. MOS:GENDERID is a guideline on how to refer to a person whose gender might be questioned...

made to this discussion. I propose adding the following section to MOS:GENDERID: People who do not identify as male or female If neither male nor female...

§ Gender identity - guideline on writing about LGBT+ persons; shortcut MOS:GENDERID Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography § Changed names - guideline about (in...

changing gender-neutral language to gendered, in contravention of WP:GENDERID. Historically there have been other IPs performing the same edits, I have...

necessarily so. Doug butler (talk) 08:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC) 2603, actually MOS:GENDERID requires more than "well documented". It requires that the person is notable...

articles. Develop English Wikipedia's gender identity guideline at MOS:GENDERID or review related discussion at "Manual of Style/Gender identity". Increasingly...

be made to this discussion. Should the following text be added to MOS:GENDERID, inserted before the fourth paragraph? Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:01, 12 June...

privacy issue. How would I include them in the cast list to comply with MOS:GENDERID? Using the old name is deadnaming. Using the new name would make no sense...

As you say this event occurred under your deadname, this passage of MOS:GENDERID seems to be the relevant one: "Former names under which a living person...

must strictly follow Wikipedia's behavioral and editorial guidelines. MOS:GENDERID and the supplementary essay MOS:GIDINFO contain the most up-to-date guidelines...

invoked, these debates have generally revolved around MOS:GENDERID. But, currently, GENDERID only expressly considers the "deadname[s]" of living trans...

the WP:BIODELETE in the nom). If the article is not deleted, then MOS:GENDERID applies (as the subject's notability was under their previous deadname...

following caveat: there's an interesting analysis to be made about whether MOS:GENDERID applies here or not for the categories including actors in the name. I'm...

(UTC) Our guideline WP:GENDERID does not cover this unique situation, because the sex of Utada Hikaru is not in question. WP:GENDERID covers gender identity...

isn't a problem on Wikipedia. The problem is exactly the opposite; MOS:GENDERID not being concrete enough, clear enough or applying to non-biog articles...

(UTC) @Tradedia: With respect, I can't agree with this interpretation. MOS:GENDERID is (and was at that time) pretty clear on the question that thread was...

appear in search results? added 14 April 2017, archived 2 May 2017 MOS:GENDERID for genderqueer people added 14 April 2017, archived 3 May 2017 Inclusivity...

July 2018 (UTC) Gronk Oz I think the guidance you are looking for is MOS:GENDERID. Thinker78 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC) That guideline refers to cases...

Overall, there is no consensus to change the wording of MOS:GENDERID based on this proposal. We’ve had several proposals to raise the bar for inclusion...

using the pronoun that the subject prefers now, throughout. So, "He". MOS:GENDERID, WP:TRANSNAME. In the specific case of "He won best female singer", I would...

lead unless related to the person's notability. Shortcuts MOS:GENDERIDMOS:GENDERID MOS:GIDMOS:GID MOS:DEADNAMEMOS:DEADNAME MOS:MISGENDERMOS:MISGENDER MOS:NBMOS:NB...

article is not reported in reliable sources. That's okay! Per MOS:ID and MOS:GENDERID, we refer to people using gendered words only if they reflect their gender...

point of GENDERID. --Masem (t) 23:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC) Support - The proposed wording seems perfectly factual and doesn't run afoul of MOS:GENDERID, despite...

pronoun usage has already been cited by Viennese Waltz above: it's MOS:GENDERID. In short, a Wikipedia article should reflect the person's most recent...

2023, archived 13 July 2023 Guideline on inclusion of deadnames in MOS:GENDERID Added 13 June 2023, archived 20 July 2023 Removing the "your first article"...

above is mostly accurate but incorrect on the central issue here. See MOS:GENDERID. I've moved and amended the article accordingly. – Arms & Hearts (talk)...

(referring to WP:GENDERID). The issues of local consensus pales in comparison to those imho. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC) WP:GENDERID is a guideline...

MOS:GENDERID for a trans person was in an edit summary in which I referred to Tara Wolf with male pronouns. Can you clarify to what degree MOS:GENDERID or...

the truth, since my views are MOS:GENDERID and MOS:DOCTCAPS and MOS:TM. The essay did not express my views on GENDERID matters, it made fun of individual...

Previously that edit was added by a TA and reverted on the grounds of WP:GENDERID. I tried politely warning Floraracine on their talk page to abide by the...

is does, in fact, reflect the consensus of the Wikipedia community. MOS:GENDERID says not to do that in article space, and many, many editors have been...

productive discussion, they routinely misrepresent (or misunderstand) MOS:GENDERID and, without citing any significant sources, push the idea that their way...

encourage you to do so. CatCafe (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC) Per MOS:GENDERID, we should be referring to people (in articles) according to their latest...

evidenced in each of my edit summaries. The latter is simply false; MOS:GENDERID says Use context to determine which name or names to provide on a case-by-case...

Studies-specific standard at WP:TRANSNAME, and a related standard at WP:GENDERID. If we have to have the discussion again, deadnaming is an invasion of...

children who appears to be in transition. Should the issue actually be MOS:GENDERID, a solution might be to change the article to say they have four children...

User:Serols - gender identity is completely irrelevant to surgery - see WP:GENDERID. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC) @Black Kite: thanks...

attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Comments: Violating WP:GENDERID, despite talk page messages and reverts saying about this. --Ferien (talk)...

name should continue to be used in the article per WP:IDENTITY and WP:GENDERID) The person could be considered to be from multiple minority groups so...

unnecessarily outs their past gender and disrespects the subject per WP:GENDERID and WP:NONBINARY. Arbcom's discretionary sanctions apply, again this is...

frequently done so to indicate order of preference. When contrasted against MOS:GENDERID, I see absolutely no reason to change the state of the article at this...

--Tarage (talk) 18:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC) He may not have known MOS:GENDERID, additionally there are very few sources that present an actual self-description...

be a misunderstanding of how nonbinary identities works (and of how MOS:GENDERID, which by its letter does not currently discuss such identities, has generally...

diff, it may be worth adding the same reminder here that I added to the GENDERID discussion before it turns into forum shopping. As a general antidote to...

shebaz sharif is not any more pakistani prime mister Incorrect dates? GENDERID and before-transition names in other articles when the subject was not...

the chief defenders among the MoS regulars of singular-they and of MOS:GENDERID, especially as regards to not mis-gendering bio subjects.) This is a repeat...

current version, which uses "they" but explains this at the outset, per GENDERID's advice to "explain it without overemphasis on first occurrence in an article"...

make clear that Maneesh feels that the site-wide values embedded in MOS:GENDERID have nothing to do with my general civil conduct on this website and that...

twenty years after his death" [64] I readded the template, referencing MOS:GENDERID in the edit summary. [65] I ask Roxy about their removal of thecategories...

transgender people. For this issue, the relevant section of the MOS is MOS:GENDERID. —Granger (talk · contribs) 17:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC) @BigDwiki: are you...

abide by it, then don't get involved with those issues. (FTR I think MOS:GENDERID is 100% bat shit crazy and I absolutely refuse to get involved in anything...

also not fully understanding what point QEDK was trying to make with MOS:GENDERID (which is obviously relevant here). I agree with Nihlus that the consensus...

that tree is a pronoun and should be used as such in the article. MOS:GENDERID is good but it's a guideline that gives no hint that an article must use...

name should be and it should only be added with respect to WP:RS and MOS:GENDERID. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 13:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC) That's cool, but that's...

transgender people. For this issue, the relevant section of the MOS is MOS:GENDERID. —Granger (talk · contribs) 17:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC) @BigDwiki: are you...

Self-declared GREATWRONGS / TRUTH agenda to lobby against years of solid GENDERID / DEADNAME consensus. 2 August 2020 – WW's "Battleground Comment" screed...

against it, so misguided though it be, it is not a violation of BLPTALK, GENDERID, or NOTFORUM." Had kinda thought – on some evidence (Five Pillars) – that...

(seriously) is the talk page behind MOS:GENDERID, where, by my count, only four of the sixteen sections do not focus on GENDERID. You could throw another section...

woman who identified as a man. This is a clear violation of BLP and MOS:GENDERID. In response to being reverted and warned, they attempted to turn it into...

diff 5, to which GoodDay replies with a non-sequitur about misuse of MOS:GENDERID [159] GoodDay returns to aspersions about an editor. [160] GoodDay posts...

be resubmitted. Declined means that a draft may be resubmitted. See MOS:GENDERID for guidance on how to handle gender for a transgendered person. You don't...

gender identity, but around the more fact-based question, drawn from MOS:GENDERID, of what gender Barry presented as at the time of his death. Some aspects...

project, take an editorial position on any number of topics, such as MOS:GENDERID and deadnaming, that would usually be settled by our normal analysis of...

are needed on the following matter: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#MOS:GENDERID being used in place of WP:Article titles and for category arguments. A...

must strictly follow Wikipedia's behavioral and editorial guidelines. MOS:GENDERID and the supplementary essay MOS:GIDINFO contain the most up-to-date guidelines...

diffusing or not (WP:FINAL RUNG would exclude it in many cases). See also WP:GENDERID which may be relevant for the example you're mentioning. --Francis Schonken...

discussion. This looks like WP:FORUMSHOP. The existing guidance is at MOS:GENDERID, which states "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred...

We have some guidelines in the MOS about this (at MOS:IDINFO and MOS:GENDERID). Wikipedia's voice does have to use a person's preferred pronouns when...

it defeats the purpose of keyboard entry. Example: Alt+⇧ Shift+F MOS:GENDERID ↵ Enter took me to WP:MOS and WP:MOSBIO, successively, until I moved the...

and welcome to the Teahouse. The relevant guidelines here would be MOS:GENDERID and MOS:MULTIPLENAMES. As I understand it, you would refer to the identity...

If this is satire, like of over-enforcement of MOS:GENDERID or something--not that that MOS:GENDERID is necessarily a worthy target of satire either--then...

that you have transitioned, however one of Wikipedia's guidelines, MOS:GENDERID, requires deadnames to be used if the subject was notable under that name...

of Style. -- Hoary (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC) According to MOS:GENDERID, When the subject of the article identifies with neopronouns, the pronouns...

for Wikipedia. If you haven't done so already, it's worth consulting MOS:GENDERID. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @TheAafi: It is certainly...

to stay in line with current guidelines and best practice, such as MOS:GENDERID, MOS:GNL or Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Guidelines. Most editors...

articles in question. The relevant guidance for pronoun use is at MOS:GENDERID. As your account is relatively new, it might be worth considering creating...

and indicate a lack of respect for nonbinary Wikipedia editors. See MOS:GENDERID and WP:EDPRONOUNS. There's no positive value in this template existing...

name usage within the article. Pronoun usage is clear per MOS:GENDERID, but MOS:GENDERID does not apply to article titles. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:59...

complicated issue. Also, please be sensitive to follow the guidelines at MOS:GENDERID when using gender-specific terms during this discussion. ~ Rob13Talk 02:32...

official or birth names, in infoboxes. Please read MOS:MULTIPLENAMES and MOS:GENDERID for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC) FWIW, I'm...

reading this wrong‽ TheAwesomeHwyh 20:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC) ​See: MOS:GENDERID TheAwesomeHwyh 20:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC) Yeah, that was completely ridiculous...

in the minority against what has become the community consensus for MOS:GENDERID, as examples of their propensity to IDONTLIKEIT). 2) the WP:POVFORK arguments...

pronouns and gender identification that the person themself uses. See MOS:GENDERID. Mathglot (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC) Solved, with thanks to Mathglot...

entirely different proposals and do not have the same goals. Please read the GENDERID proposal more carefully, it's about article namespace (which this proposal...

where reading and writing names themselves are problematic (although WP:GENDERID is another such situation, although the guideline is silent about whether...

the redirect that may not apply to others. While the linked RFC on MOS:GENDERID is relevant, it will not close for a month or so, so there isn’t much point...

08:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC) So, please refer to WP:NOQUEERPHOBIA (or WP:GENDERID), an essay that is a manifesto defending LGBT, which right to exist you...

28 May 2026 (UTC) Restoring the name would not be appropriate per MOS:GENDERID, which encourages avoiding deadnaming even if that means replacing portions...

(UTC) I'm going to caution you that WP:BLPTALK trumps MOS:DEADNAME and MOS:GENDERID even though I don't believe editors should be misgendering people. MOS...

should still not be altered.--Verbarson (talk) 10:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC) MOS:GENDERID says "Paraphrase, elide, or use square brackets to replace portions of...

played Nigeria since 2006. http://canadasoccer.com/index.php?t=schedule&genderId=0&seasonKeyword=&tid=all&opponentTeamKeyword=Nigeria&venueKeyword=&month=0&year=All...

Longhair\talk 03:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC) Added to my watchlist. Note that MOS:GENDERID is pretty clear on what pronouns ought to be used in the article. Lankiveil...

that particular piece of information out. I adhere to MOS:IDENTITY, MOS:GENDERID, and WP:BLP (whether or not I personally agree with them all in their entirety)...

in the minority against what has become the community consensus for MOS:GENDERID, as examples of their propensity to IDONTLIKEIT). 2) the WP:POVFORK arguments...

even pre-MOS:GENDERID. And if you're talking about the SOPHIE RfC, I don't think that applies here. The first paragraph of MOS:GENDERID that says refer...

shebaz sharif is not any more pakistani prime mister Incorrect dates? GENDERID and before-transition names in other articles when the subject was not...

played Nigeria since 2006. http://canadasoccer.com/index.php?t=schedule&genderId=0&seasonKeyword=&tid=all&opponentTeamKeyword=Nigeria&venueKeyword=&month=0&year=All...

system. HalfShadow 19:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC) @HalfShadow: Per MOS:GENDERID and WP:GENDERID, the pronoun is "she". Regardless of your personal beliefs, please...

need admin attention given the potential implications for interpreting WP:GENDERID and WP:BLP. The article is also subject to very frequent edit warring over...

semi-protection: BLP policy violations – disruptive IP edits contrary to MOS:GENDERID (i.e. misgendering) following expiration of previous protections. Bridget (talk)...

factors that made me opposed to extending GENDERID to dead people was this very thing. I was worried that, if GENDERID were extended, all conversation about...

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#GENDERID in BLP is the most recent discussion, however the TNT on GENDERID, and WP:BOLD restrictions on the use of...

and policy/guideline development around topics like MOS:DEADNAME and MOS:GENDERID (as well as a thematically related essay, No queerphobes, which was in...

information about an individual in the page was adjusted to be in line with MOS:GENDERID, this page has seen a persistent string of largely IP editors showing up...

Lynne O'Brophy73.21.38.196 (talk) 15:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC) See MOS:GENDERID. Apparently, the subject prefers the "singular they", and some sources...

2020 (UTC) Opinions are needed on the following: Talk:Joey Soloway#MOS:GENDERID with regard to article titles. A permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Frozen...

policy is respect for the individual. Our policy on gender identity (MOS:GENDERID) for example is entirely respect-based as misgendering poses no legal risk...

vandalism (MOS:GENDERID/WP:BLP) by IPs after a new user was warned. Beccaynr (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Due to the criteria of MOS:GENDERID I am considering...

logs) Extend-confirmed: BLP policy violations – Reoccurring issue with MOS:GENDERID, even with the current protection. I think extended confirmed is needed...

Skyler is male-to-female transgender, and her pronouns are she/her, per MOS:GENDERID. Requesting page protection for that reason. L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:20, 24...

we don't note this, per MOS:GENDERID. They were notable under their birth first+last name, so we note this, per GENDERID. Personally I think MOS gives...

that the link that several people have been struggling to find may be MOS:GENDERID. Note that this is a rare case of something overruling reliable sources:...

discussed drafts (which overlapped this Philosophy Tube discussion), MOS:GENDERID and MOS:DEADNAME have been heavily revised, and merged.  — SMcCandlish...

options were chosen; Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 182#RFC: MOS:GENDERID and the deadnames of deceased trans and nonbinary persons and Wikipedia:Requests...

and new editors are overwhelmingly making edit requests to violate MOS:GENDERID. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 11:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected...

one hand, they/them is the most recent self-expressed pronoun per MOS:GENDERID, but since Hynes removed it, it isn't clear if it was a mistake. In any...

confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Violations of WP:BLP/MOS:GENDERID. Woodroar (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected as regular...

logs) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent violations of WP:GENDERID in the past couple of weeks, changing pronouns. CodeTalker (talk) 21:01...

29 December 2021 and there has already been an attempt to violate MOS:GENDERID. Per my understanding of WP:ARBGS, I believe this page should be protected...

semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent pronoun changes against MOS:GENDERID. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Semi-protected for...

high-profile relationship, which has caused an increase in IP violations of MOS:GENDERID. I am requesting protection per my understanding of WP:ARBGS. Bizarre BizarreTalk...

changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous violations of MOS:GENDERID (mostly IP editors replaying they/them pronouns with she/her ones). Some...

semi-protection: Consistent IP reversion of BLP pronouns contrary to MOS:GENDERID. Jessamyn (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

WikiProject". But WikiProject conventions shouldn't ever override MOS:GENDERID, so could someone explain in clearer terms why we are going against reliable...

logs | views) which started off under a different title. To comply with MOS:GENDERID I removed the one reference which has the possible dead name in the title...

pronouns used for Grelle to he/him ([3][4][5][6]) in violation of MOS:GENDERID, as Grelle's most recent self-designated pronouns are they/them. (Their...

noticeboard of incidents (43 threads) Most recent: Potentially disruptive WP:GENDERID violations Dispute between WMF and its employees over Unionization is getting...

about how she now identifies as a male to female transgender. Per MOS:GENDERID, we should Give precedence to self-designation as reported in the most...

their main biographical article Manual of Style 2017/5 RfC regarding MOS:GENDERID for genderqueer people Requests for comment 2018/3 Applications of the...

links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: BLP violations, edit warring on WP:GENDERID. A similar request was put in for page protection yesterday resulting in...

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, mostly the usual flagrant disregard for MOS:GENDERID. 3mi1y (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

a new name has been identified either, so this element of GENDERID does not apply. GENDERID further encourages the use of pronouns that are generally...

and this page is experiencing IP vandalism over MOS:DEADNAME and MOS:GENDERID regarding the dispute of one of the desinger's names. 72.226.18.6 (talk)...

discuss cycle. I suggest before you post there, you visit MOS:IDENTITY, MOS:GENDERID and Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Guidelines, and any pages you find...

article by changing the gender identity of the subject (in opposition to MOS:GENDERID) without explanation or edit summary. — TAnthonyTalk 14:50, 19 April 2020...

logs) Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Blatant MOS:GENDERID violations about a living person. Almost every edit is to change their...

violations – IP vandalism changing "she/her" to "he/him" in violation of MOS:GENDERID. Nanophosis (talk) 00:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

with editors seemingly eager to violate MOS:GENDERID all over again. I support adhering to MOS:GENDERID and aver that it applied in this case. P-Makoto...

least a month, possibly longer, there have been ongoing violations of MOS:GENDERID regarding the subject's pronouns. A lot of these edits come from IPs, which...

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism around her gender/MOS:GENDERID. William Avery (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC) Semi-protected for a...

sentence which says "Hewson uses they-and-them pronouns". A violation of MOS:GENDERID. (The two which weren't vandalism were fixing the vandalism.) The page...

semi-protection: Recent rash of IP edits blatantly violating WP:BLP and MOS:GENDERID. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Semi-protected for...

editing – New user really does not want to listen to attempts to explain MOS:GENDERID to them, and is edit warring against policy. . Brustopher (talk) 16:18...

Persistent vandalism, in the form of misgendering by IPs, in violation of WP:GENDERID. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC) Yes, please protect...

system. HalfShadow 19:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC) @HalfShadow: Per MOS:GENDERID and WP:GENDERID, the pronoun is "she". Regardless of your personal beliefs, please...

editing), [232] (April 2023; after which they received a notice about MOS:GENDERID + a separate one on gender/sexuality as a contentious topic area on their...

intentionally overemphasize the assigned gender part in blatant violation of MOS:GENDERID [256] - removing of women [257] - erasing transgender peoples existence...

of a possible suicide or particularly gruesome crime. — WP:BDP If MOS:GENDERID originates in WP:BLPPRIVACY, then it reasonable to assume that it should...

please! Foxgloved (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2018 (UTC) You are looking for MOS:GENDERID "Give precedence to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date...

responses. Thank you. RedEchidna (talk) 07:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC) MOS:GENDERID is unambiguous about using a subject’s self-stated pronouns. Is there any...

trans man with a rationale regarding privacy. I looked through WP:BLP, MOS:GENDERID, and even WP:Gender identity, and I'm not sure which way to go on this...

they said, "children cannot reliably identify their own gender so MOS:GENDERID does not apply. The entire concept of 'trans children', especially when...

used in this article should be changed to "she/her" to comply with MOS:GENDERID, or whether this does not apply because the subject of the article came...

not limited to, the following: WP:WAW MOS:GNL WP:GNL WP:GNLP MOS:GENDERID WP:GENDERID MOS:DEADNAME The policies that may be indirectly affected by this...

rulings. On the other end of the spectrum, we have something like MoS:GENDERID, which is the result of a lot of community negotiation in some of the most...

13:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC) Comment I would suggest Darwin review MOS:GENDERID. If the child uses she/her pronouns we should not be referring to her with...

Endorse as closer: the question is simple – does MOS:GENDERID apply to Confait? Well, GENDERID applies to "any person whose gender might be questioned"...

and policy/guideline development around topics like MOS:DEADNAME and MOS:GENDERID (as well as a thematically related essay, No queerphobes, which was in...

masculine pronouns (as Junlper is a transgender woman, this is against MOS:GENDERID) for and slur the subject of the article. CJ-Moki (talk) 23:01, 11 October...

previously removed the Personal life section in Campbell's article per MOS:GENDERID - which says - Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with...

identification. Agnieszka653 (talk) 17:41, 28 November 2025 (UTC) No, MOS:GENDERID is pretty clear on that; unless there is a specific statement from the...

policy/guidance. Is there an inherent conflict between WP:Commonname and MOS:GENDERID remains an open question. Although there is no limit to the number of RMs...

GENSEX topics following Wikipedia policies and guidelines (including MOS:GENDERID), as shown above. Skyshiftertalk 16:38, 28 March 2026 (UTC) It absolutely...

Monica's non-notable former name, which is currently excluded per MOS:GENDERID. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC) You disrespect each...

20200920141751 [[Paul Denyer]] moved to [[Paula Denyer]]: again, per [[MOS:GENDERID]]; seek consensus before moving 1724 Paul_Denino (talk · hist) Gogo Dodo...

Arbitration enforcement: Gender-related dispute topic area—persistent MOS:GENDERID violations Dream (YouTuber) El C 2023-08-16 Violations of the biographies...

August 2025 (UTC) Just waiting for this to crash into things like MOS:GENDERID. Leaving aside that whole topic area, I disagree with your premise that...

abide to MOS:GENDERID whether they like it or not (I don't like it). However on the other end some people want to enforce MOS:GENDERID to every namespace(i...

my count seven registered users and two IPs arguing on the basis of MOS:GENDERID that we should refer to Caitlyn Jenner, and Geraldo Perez arguing against...

rapists. Even if the crime was committed before they transitioned, MOS:GENDERID holds that individuals should be referred to as their preferred identity...

Non-members 32 52% 30 48% Both 41 56% 32 44% RfC: Proposed addition to MOS:GENDERID - when to include deadnames Members 10 83% 2 17% Non-members 26 37% 45...

they said, "children cannot reliably identify their own gender so MOS:GENDERID does not apply. The entire concept of 'trans children', especially when...

Please see: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Proposal to split MOS:GENDERID from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography, a proposal to move material out...

of the two discussions at issue, WP:VPP#RfC: Proposed addition to MOS:GENDERID - when to include deadnames: During July 3 (UTC), I posted 3 comments in...

disclosed gender. The argument supporting this violates WP:BLPGOSSIP, MOS:GENDERID and WP:MEDRS at minimum. The talk page was already EC locked but still...

logs) Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated MOS:GENDERID violations in last week from (seemingly) unrelated TA accounts and a new...

name should continue to be used in the article per WP:IDENTITY and WP:GENDERID) The person could be considered to be from multiple minority groups so...

25% of editors should be allowed to make our articles comply with MOS:GENDERID. The other 99.75% of editors should be warned and blocked if they try to...

experience (as with the discussions that went into the 2020-23 revisions to MOS:GENDERID) is not easily replaced. Newimpartial (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)...

describe trans people should be a matter for the MOS, for example, MOS:GENDERID. Being anti-trans is not a theory, anti-trans people or groups might believe...

editing – Persistent disruptive changes to gendered language, contrary to MOS:GENDERID. Connected to the subject's relative, Dylan Mulvaney, whose own article...

clarification on the policy being invoked. WP:BLPSEXUALITY is a red-link and MOS:GENDERID is mute on the topic being raised. Simonm223 (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2026 (UTC)...

the WP:BIODELETE in the nom). If the article is not deleted, then MOS:GENDERID applies (as the subject's notability was under their previous deadname...

own bio on her website consistently uses "she," "her," and "girl." MOS:GENDERID states that we should use a person's self-identification (in this case...

includes saying that properly gendering trans people in line with MOS:GENDERID is comparable to a Muslim user forcing his religious beliefs on Wikipedia...

disruptively change the personal pronouns in the article, against the MOS:GENDERID guideline. — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected for...

deference to a living subject. That can be seen in things such as MOS:GENDERID, which led us to (for example) using they/them pronouns for Raegan Revord...

or two back we had the same thing happen with proposals related to MOS:GENDERID where people jumped on the bandwagon of proposing things and forked off...

June 2025 (UTC) What are you proposing to do that is not covered by MOS:GENDERID? 331dot (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC) That probably covers any concerns...

year or birth place for a BLP) and sometimes with other rules (e.g., MOS:GENDERID). The rule is that you want all articles to be WP:Based upon (i.e., mostly...

while now. I tried removing Baker's former name earlier this month per MOS:GENDERID. I also agree with Loki, and have said on the article's talk page that...

includes saying that properly gendering trans people in line with MOS:GENDERID is comparable to a Muslim user forcing his religious beliefs on Wikipedia...

logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits against WP:GENDERID. Sjö (talk) 06:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of...

Userpage contains a WP:NPA against transgender people violating our MOS:GENDERID guidelines, so I have the suspicion this user is WP:NOTHERE to build an...

this discussion, as well as any future discussions on the scope of MOS:GENDERID while the broader GENSEX TBAN remains in place, would I think be of significant...

attack, and the one who violated BLPRESTORE to reintroduce content against GENDERID) and who "really want" to see me sanctioned. I'm pretty sure most of the...

Huggums537voted! (sign🖋️|📞talk) 18:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC) Do you also oppose MOS:GENDERID, which is based on style guides and which also doesn't have Official Scientific™...

been back and forth on Kawashima's pronouns. I do believe that as per MOS:GENDERID Kawashima should be referred to with masc pronouns since what I believe...

July 2023 (UTC) Hi and welcome to the Teahouse! I could have sworn MOS:GENDERID addressed this but it appears not to. There is a note on Demi Lovato on...

their talk page date they acknowledged the CTOP informing them of MOS:GENDERID and they haven't edited since. Depending on their next edits, a TBAN/block...

formal. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC) No, see MOS:GENDERID, which says "Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with...

to Gloria Hemingway in order to make sure links to her comply with MOS:GENDERID, however it seems that she's included in Template:Ernest Hemingway, and...

published in secondary sources to preserve privacy, two common cases being MOS:GENDERID and WP:BLPCRIME. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC) OK...

section. However, this conclusion is from 2018 and conflicts with MOS:GENDERID. He lived as a man for 53 years up until his death, and other wikipedia...

feedback :) Handumont (talk) 22:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC) I want to follow MOS:GENDERID in the Moi Renée article. When I wrote it, I followed the model of a Village...

in which I make clear that owing to my disagreement with parts of MOS:GENDERID, that I generally refrain from editing in subject areas where that is likely...

(talk) 19:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC) General guidance in this area is at MOS:GENDERID. Their gender needs to be reflected in some reliable source, we can't just...

logs) Temporary semi-protection: High levels of attempts to violate MOS:GENDERID by IP editors and new accounts in past 2 weeks lizthegrey (talk) 18:20...

page. In response to DanielRigal's warning, Thunderbird calls our MOS:GENDERID guidelines "compelled speech rules" because they'd require him to use she/her...

it has been subjected to pronoun changes since it's relevance to MOS:GENDERID was established. Pending changes would help put a lid on that while still...

archives and most of the discussion was prior to formal establishment of MOS:GENDERID (which states the dead name should be included in the lede on this type...

English translation, which seems very reasonable and has some support in MOS:GENDERID. Hut 8.5 10:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC) It's absolutely supported by the...

an isolated non-binding discussion & that the actual status quo was MOS:GENDERID) Rosguill (selects C as a fallback, prefers taking cues from RS coverage...

community member, no matter how strong a supoprter of the general sentiment of GENDERID and related principles of individual respect we may be, needs to remember:...

semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various SPA’s warring over MOS:GENDERID. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 13:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC) Extended confirmed...

watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing MOS:GENDERID issues. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC) Semi-protected for...

will no longer state nor imply that it is history revisionism. Per MOS:GENDERID, these pages must use current names/pronouns aside from a single mention...

logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent MOS:GENDERID target. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 16:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Semi-protected...

noting that children cannot reliably identify their own gender so MOS:GENDERID does not apply. The entire concept of "trans children", especially when...

Reason: Persistent changes of actor's pronouns by IP editors, against MOS:GENDERID. Page has been protected before, and disruption resumes after it expires...

Talk:Murder of Brianna Ghey after redacting her deadname (which, per MOS:GENDERID, doesn't belong, but that's another story for another day) and Eckstasy...

watch | logs) Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – MOS:GENDERID violations. BangJan1999 00:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC) Extended confirmed protected...

objectionable, but on the off-chance you genuinely don't, please see MOS:GENDERID. This policy is concerned with article content rather than comments on...

not female (Link), among other such comments. I informed them about MOS:GENDERID and the rules about Wikipedia and refused to get into an argument about...

found a few more edit summary warnings and transphobic comments after a GENDERID violation (from 2021). Since another warning would presumably be ignored...

their power to wikilawyer their way to victory. in the current RfC on MOS:GENDERID At 10:39, 24 July 2023 he said a large number of TG/NB persons would nevertheless...

Cole), the battleground lines have been drawn for the shooting and at MOS:GENDERID, and generally the support/oppose from those involved has matched the ideological...

attacks. They also, for whatever reason, seem to be unable to conform to MOS:GENDERID as seen in their most recent edit summary Mikewem (talk) 01:31, 17 February...

saw what I believe to be misapplication of relevant guidelines like MOS:GENDERID that I decided to remain and actively contribute to the broader discussions...

history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: BLP with persistent MOS:GENDERID issues from new and unregistered editors. CIreland (talk) 21:52, 8 March...

| history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Per WP:BLP, WP:BDP, and MOS:GENDERID. There's a lot of misinformation online about the suspect shooter's gender...

in contentious topic, persistent unsourced edits and violations of MOS:GENDERID by SPA. I like octopusestalk to me, talk to me 17:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)...

familiar with our policies around the CTOP area and in particular MOS:GENDERID. Requesting Arbitration Enforcement under the WP:GENSEX policy. Raladic...

brother. There is consensus on talk, and has been for some time, that MOS:GENDERID as applied to the more in-depth RS dictates masculine terms. Between good-faith...

watch | logs) Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Violations of MOS:GENDERID. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:08, 9 June 2025 (UTC) +1. Speculate that its coordinated...

pronoun-swapping by IPs. Article uses he/him for Morgan Geyser per MOS:GENDERID. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (talk • stalk) 06:58, 26 November 2025 (UTC) Semi-protected...

much in the past decade, all TA edits are changing pronouns against MOS:GENDERID. Belbury (talk) 08:00, 1 June 2026 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of...

links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Ongoing GENDERID vios from multiple IPs changing pronouns Nil🥝Talk 01:38, 17 July 2025...

Persistent nuisance edits to the pronouns of the subject in violation of MOS:GENDERID. Jessamyn (my talk page) 19:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC) Extended confirmed...

logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous WP:GENDERID violations. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:45, 10 February 2025 (UTC)...

links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GENDERID violations (subject is transgender). LaffyTaffer💬(they/she) 20:45, 17...

disruptive. Furthermore the recent edits to Alejandra Caraballo violate MOS:GENDERID in a particularly problematic manner. An editor who is WP:NOTHERE and edits...

Done - (Initiated 1247 days ago on 10 March 2023) and WP:SNOW; would like formal closure on a talk page with a contentious history so we can archive talk...

how these edits violate it Nov 14, 2025 Vandalism in violation of MOS:GENDERID Nov 14, 2025 Ditto Oct 4, 2025 Changed a trans BLP's name in article to...